| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.Huh? What do you mean significance across the population? Either it is an impossibility or it isn’t. If it’s not, and that is absolute fact. Also… You didn’t read the studies well because the XX individuals had testes and not ovotestes… and the explanation of intersex variations in the overview does not implicate anything about individuals in question. You also provided no basis at all for concluding that the XX SRY- individuals were mis labels. 10-15 percent of all XX males (De La Chappelle syn… | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/09/24 05:54 AM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.What?! You have got to be kidding. I gave you five case studies. There are more but that’s more than enough. I showed you precisely what you said wasn’t true and gave yon more sources than would be needed. Even one would prove the point. That was the point. Nobody said they were common. The fact they can and do occur is precisely why your reasoning fails. Also.. What the hell? They aren’t testing errors. What in Gods name. Can’t you folks ever just admit you are plainly wrong. Ever? Even once? I… | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/09/24 03:55 AM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.45 X males: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1684785/ 46 XX with no SRY but male: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289540/ 46 XX with no SRY and SOX9 abnormality: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24140641/ Another one like the above: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7499138/ And so on | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/09/24 02:12 AM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.Source for which part? I mean you are the one who linked to something that talked about determining sex and misinterpreted as meaning “define” rather than “cause” or “process” https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/sex%20determination What hormonal and surgical interventions are doing is hijacking’s and redirecting the process and medically reallocating those tissues morphologically and in some ways functionally. | /r/BlackPillScience | 16/09/24 02:08 AM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.I explained it over and over. I explained why genes aren’t the limiting factor in determining sex in humans. There are no genes that need to be altered to change sex. Chromosomes aren’t sex. Sex is a multi factor concept. Most factors can be swapped across by hormones and surgery. Whether jn nature or Medicine, Any karyotype can cause other sex. I am bringing up intersex individuals because they are all male or female by aggregate of all sex characteristics and explain precisely why and how medi… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 07:50 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.There are 45, X males and females, and 46 XX males with testes, some of whom do not even have an SRY gene but merely have a slightly odd SOX8 or SOX9 gene. The SOX9 isn’t even on the sex chromosomes… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 07:27 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.It’s because the exceptions prove why sex can be medically altered in much the same way as those variations occur. They want it to be binary because they want a social structure that makes it extremely punitive for people to exist outside of a specific sex category as defined at birth and enforced by banning medical treatments and legal document changes. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 07:23 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.This is simply not true. There are XX males with testes who don’t even have SRY genes, for one example that completely disproves your point. The presence of absence of the Y isn’t sex, sex is about gametes and reproductive structures, and the overall phenotypes that support and correlate to them. It is a multi factor analysis or property cluster concept. Creating a false binary may make it all neater but not more accurate… By the way, sex determination means “the methods that cause sex”. You see… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 07:19 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.What? The genes are on the chromosomes. Gene upregulation and downregulation of shared genes, primarily controlled by sex hormones when it comes to sex differentiation, impacts dozens of times as many genes as even exist on the X. But only one X is even needed to create a male or female phenotype. That’s why there are 45, X females and even 45, X males (yes that’s a thing). There are no differences in the other 22 chromosome pairs that differ by sex. Except in terms of expressions and inactivati… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 06:46 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.And once again what does that have to do with sex? You ignored that XX males and XY females exist anyways. And gene expression upregulation and downregulation are controlled by hormones far more than by non overridable processes. Humans contain all the genes necessary to produce either sex phenotype, mostly or even completely. And even SRY negative XX males exist if the SOX9 is unregulated enough due to random repeats and mutations. That’s not even pointing out how most of 1 X in any XX cell get… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 06:41 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.Please see my reply below to AsInLife. You also just said you agreed karyotype isn’t sex, so I have no idea what that would mean. But the genetic potential for either sex phenotype is there in XX or XY and thus hormone driven regulation of sex development does achieve precisely what you are claiming. | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 04:33 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.I wouldn’t phrase it as becoming “more male” but that’s a reasonable way to state it. They would be closer to the male category line. Just like you can travel toward the border of a state and yet know with full certainty you have not crossed the border into that other state. So they would still clearly be female. Even so… What do you think causes the development of most male phenotypic attributes including those that both signal and support male fertility? When it comes to sex differentiated upr… | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 04:30 PM |
| 1 | In Finland, 68.4% of men "completely agreed" that "there are two biological sexes," compared to only 31.6% of women.How is changing biological sex impossible? It’s not only possible, it’s commonplace. Hormones and surgeries combined cause one to easily cross the midpoint of whatever sex could be (I e a post op trans woman is biologically most like a woman who had a hysterectomy) | /r/BlackPillScience | 15/09/24 06:09 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter