TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LaughingVergil Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by LaughingVergil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you dig into the research currently available, it appears that there is a positive correlation between higher testosterone and suicide. One source of information on this is this commentary paper on the NIH website. One quote from the link as an example: "Roland et al. (9) examined postmortem serum testosterone levels in males who died by suicide and sudden death male victims. They found that among 23- to 45-year-old males testosterone levels were significantly higher in the suicide group comp…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:25 PM
5

How much a different partner can change things. I've only been married one, but had a LTR (seven years) before my marriage, which was literally my first relationship. It was... bad. I don't want to go into details, but she wasn't a partner, didn't want to explore what I enjoyed, and didn't understand compromise. My friends helped me when I got out of that one. My marriage? We are partners, friends, both interested in lots of things that we are happy to share with each other. We also have things …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 02:41 AM
1

I'm not sure where you get the "you don't hear about that" thing. I knew this in high school, possibly before. That would be, oh, 1972 or so.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:20 PM
7

You didn't have to kill yourself - the end of the world would do it for you.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:42 PM
1

Of course, the CIA recording US citizens isn't their job. That's the FBI's job.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 12:05 AM
1

My feminist teacher wife asked me to pass this on: "This is a miscarriage of justice. She should have been jailed, wouldn't have kept her license, and should be at least a level 2 sex offender."
/r/MensRights14/09/18 01:46 AM
1

Please define "financial abortion" for those of us ignorant of the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 09:10 PM
1

I think that's on a person by person basis. For myself, I want to be friends before moving on to a next step - which worked well for me. I want a partner in all of my life, that understands both that I enjoy spending time with her, and that we are both fine having different interests. In High School, and up to about 25 to 27, that's not a real good approach apparently :-(. But with my 26th year of marriage coming up soon, it worked out well in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/17 10:52 PM
1

This is such a hard question to answer, because there are so many variables. You have your choice of shy, normal, and outgoing; and of introverted, average, and extroverted. There is first impressions to consider and possibly overcome - we're you snappish, grumpy, or angry on introduction (whether from lack of sleep, a cold, just failed a test, had an argument with the checkout guy, whatever) and it is too soon to form an actual impression of you. Also, the social setting - in public with lots o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/17 10:44 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree with your thesis based on my own observations and experiences. I have a dozen or more women who I am married to, dating, and/or close friends with. All of them are feminists, and none of them are unwilling to question and reject stupid feminist ideas or positions. Including the hundreds of women I have taught, I think I have known perhaps five to ten (being generous) who fit the profile you painted above. A majority of them also recognize the need for a Men's Rights…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 02:05 AM
6

It's not real. They announced on the front of their Tumblr that they're trolling, and are surprised that anyone took them seriously.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 01:34 PM
6

Even better, falling for obvious trolls (see feministtaco's page in Tumblr, then join me in a facepalm)
/r/MensRights13/04/17 01:29 PM
10

It's a troll account, announced on the front of this Tumblr. Geez.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 01:27 PM
10

Obvious bait is obvious. Go to feministtaco's (now closed) Tumblr page, and you'll see them laughing at you taking them seriously.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 01:26 PM
-7

This may be the worst definition of intersectionality I've ever read, starting with the fact that it's originator, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, is a black woman. Many white feminists argued against intersectional theory as diluting the feminist message.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:28 PM
9

She was charged with sexual assault on a victim 16 or 17, a second degree felony. It's the definition of rape biting back. Rape is defined as sexual penetration, sexual assault as everything else sexual. Since she didn't penetrate him, he wasn't raped (legally). Morally? Rape.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:51 AM
1

Mine are mostly cousins, although there are a few great uncles in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 06:23 PM
-2

I can provide anecdotal evidence. My wife and I both support many of the points MRAs put forward as reasonable responses to the way things are right now. But the high percentage of shit posts keeps me from actually visiting /r/MensRights, since it leaves me ... pissed off isn't right, but annoyed is too soft a term ... and this post, although in some ways substantive, is an example. Check out the post timestamps, and you'll find that they were reorganized to make it look like the "here come the …
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:44 PM
3

Again and again we hear of these ‘unreported’ cases somehow being ‘reported’ perhaps telepathically from victim to UN report makers. Or does the UN also employ tarot cards and astrologers’ parrots to pick a number. The article boggles the mind. It's as if the author does not understand the concept of surveys.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 02:30 PM
32

Other than the apples and oranges effect. It would be clearer and more informative to show the numbers on both cases, since it is pretty clear that there was no upward trend in the number of false reports during the period in the graphs. As presented, most people will conclude that there was a huge surge in false reports, especially since OP headlined that there was a 1,400% increase in the number of false reports (which is blatantly wrong), rather than a 1,400% increase in the percentage of rep…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:04 AM
5

What makes this city so unique? • Baltimore had the highest percentage of unfounded and baseless (u&b) rape accusations in the country at 32%+. The fifth highest was about 14%. • An internal review by some Baltimore police (NOT an official review) identified 70+ accusations that were deemed u&b with insufficient evidence to do so. This led to an official review. • Between 2002 and 2009, more than 1000 of the 911 calls about rape were dismissed by the officer responding to the call. No record exi…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:32 PM
7

Do some research before jumping to conclusions. He had sex with the minor (class A misdemeanor, since she was 15), took the pictures (a class C felony), and trafficked the child porn over the Internet (also a class C felony). He was also charged with possession of child porn, a class C felony. She had sex with the minor (a class A misdemeanor) while knowingly having the pictures taken (which doesn't seem to be explicitly called out in ND law, but would certainly be at least an aggravating factor…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 09:46 AM
1

But either generalising groups is morally wrong or it isn't. Black and white... That's all you got, that the choice is a binary function rather than a scale with multiple steps? Generalizing here: Members of the KKK are racist white supremacists. Members of NAMBLA want to legalize homosexual pedophilia. Members of Doctors Without Borders want to help in medical disasters. [Hats off to them for all their work] Members of TRP dislike or hate independent women that won't put up with their bullshit.…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:29 AM
1

You can continue to try and CYA, but showing that you know so little about the government that you don't even know who the Secretary of State is? Tch! Technicalities? You claim that Hillary is in one of the most powerful positions in the world, when she hasn't held any such position in more than a year? So if you want me to, I can also address your original point: Facts are inconvenient to your Narrative eh? Hardly surprising considering how adeptly you avoid mentioning the hundreds, if not thou…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:46 PM
1

I notice that you are changing the subject. Tl;dr: the notion that the office of President is the only elected office, or the only one that matters, is ludicrous. The original post was about two women, one a feminist, saying that they don't need a female president, just a good one. The original comment starting this thread claimed that women just didn't support women for this office. I replied to that with how the cultural barriers that have only recently come down (IMO) really precluded a woman…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:24 PM
1

If you intend to claim a factual flaw in another persons comment, don't make major factual errors in your own. Heck, you dont even mention your idol, hitlery, currently occupies one of the most powerful positions in the entire world. No, she doesn't. I assume that you are referring to Hillary's stint as Secretary of State. She left that office in Feb, 2013. Currently, she is just a citizen of the United States running for president. Edit: first paragraph was omitted.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:54 PM
1

That is true. But close isn't enough, and more people are starting to pay attention to the actual issues, not just the cash-driven hype machine.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 06:34 PM
1

I'm guessing that you are perhaps 30ish at most, and so don't understand the realities of society in the 70s, 60s, or before. Technically, legally, there was nothing holding women back in the '50s and '60s. Culturally, there was immense pressure holding women back, that really only started cracking in the late '50s and '60s, with it weakening more significantly in the late '60s and on into the '70s. Even with this weakening of the societal pressures agains women, there still exists significant p…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:14 AM
2

That worked so well for President Romney, after all. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:15 AM
4

How low are our standards when being sensible is seen as being praise worthy? Have you seen the Republican clown car? I'd give a lot to see a reasonable Republican again... Republican from my first vote until the fanatics and crazies drove me away.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:13 AM
32

There are lots of unreasonable people around. I frequently give people credit for being reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:09 AM
3

I'm with you on the last part: It doesn't matter your race or gender so long as you're qualified for the job (that goes for any job as far as I'm concerned). That said, this argument started when xNOM claimed that women have been voting men into office which implies that they've been choosing men over women which isn't true because there haven't been any females to choose in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:07 AM
1

I also have limited time to review posts. However... nit picking? How is pointing out a central premise of your argument as you originally framed it nit picking? Either you meant it originally, and your later position is inconsistent with your premise, or you meant something different than you originally posted, and your later post clarifies your intent. If a position is based on false premises, then the position is weak and to some degree unsupported. Either support your initial premise, admit …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 06:57 PM
1

What does it matter if it's not universal if it's true for western cultures in the time frame of recorded history? Um... because that wasn't what you said. What you did say was... Basically meaning that for the VAST MAJORITY of human history .00000000001% more men were allowed to vote than women. The "vast majority of human history" would seem to call for looking at an argument in a universal context. Your sudden attempt to limit the conversation to a specific subset of human history seems like …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 02:55 PM
2

That reads like babbling nonsense. it really doesn't Honestly, it really does. Your statements are only true for some cultures and timeframes. Those are not universal truths, just situational facts. In fact, this is mostly a description of "civilized" lands and cultures - there are exceptions both ways, though. So, in some times and places, for some jobs, most men were not able to get those jobs. This is so much not a universal statement of facts that I don't think that my initial assessment was…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 02:58 AM
4

I suspect that this may be a regional thing. It certainly doesn't imply weakness where I am from (Oregon) or to people in my profession (IT).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 12:04 AM
1

If that's the real definition of oppression, then the majority of men were oppressed for the majority of history too. I'm sorry, but what the heck are you talking about?? Let's see how that works out by putting it into words. The real oppression men had was not being able to work the same jobs as men with the same level of earned respect That reads like babbling nonsense. The real oppression men had was not being able to vote Some truth here, although for the majority of recorded history no one …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 11:59 PM
4

There are also a fair number of posts there that forward stuff from parody accounts, as well as stuff that originated on one of the xChans (4chan, usually) and was reposted on Twitter, tumblr, or Facebook. Wish more people would take the time to research this stuff...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 04:08 AM
68

Can't wait to grow up to become an adult male in the U.S. /s Did you read either article? Both cases are Australian, and not from the USA.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:20 AM
37

Yes. No one was charged with a crime, but THREE people (the boy, the girl, and another student) were put on the police database. OP's post is mostly inaccurate when it discusses the consequences in this case.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 02:14 PM
5

I'm secretly the hacker 4Chan.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:58 PM
2

This is actually a good question. Who built this list? It's obvious it is a JSON doc - could it be a source DB for a reddit browser extension similar to the one used on Twitter by the anti-Gamergate crowd?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:17 PM
2

Practically speaking, pure anythingism seems to be unworkable in all but the smallest, simplest societies. Once the society grows larger than everyone knows everyone else, the assumed ethics / underlying principles of the society start breaking down as people start optimizing things to their benefit while not worrying about the faceless "them" that may be hurt. Regulations and laws are humanity's way of making sure that individuals don't forget the faceless "them."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 04:46 PM
6

You misunderstood my position. These regulatory agencies were created in response to the actions of people taking objectivist-like positions. Rational self interest (RSI) leads competitors to collaborate on markets and prices. Response: antitrust regulations. RSI leads food producers to cut corners and save on costs when producing consumables. Response: the FDA. RSI leads manufacturers and retailers to "color" their advertising, making their products seem better /more capable than they really ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 01:42 PM
1

Unfortunately, it has been proven time and again to not benefit society. There are reasons that various regulatory bureaucracies were created, and many, if not most, were related to objectivist-like positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 10:27 AM
1

I have to ask - how do you know there is no other evidence? Digging around, I find mentions of threats sent via text messages at the very least. If even one such text message threatening harm to any of the girls if she ever told anyone exists, it would be corroborating evidence. Do I know if that evidence exists? Nope. Do you know it does not exist? Nope. Prosecutors do not just put their evidence out for everyone to review. We don't know what evidence, if any, the prosecutor has, and we're not …
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:55 AM
4

If you really think female + tumblr = feminist, you haven't actually looked around on tumblr. It's like thinking that couple + abuse = female victim.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:05 PM
7

I think the question is incomplete. It should be "Are people manipulative?" Given that question, the answer is "yes".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 05:18 PM
11

That's s huge assumption on your part. Even healthy relationships can have problems and/or fail. Why? People change. I'm certainly not the same person I was when I joined the army (1975), when I left the army (1982), when I got into my first LTR (1984), or even when I married my wife (different relationship, 1992). And I am not the same person now as I was when we got married. How do we continue to have a healthy relationship? The list above is most of it, but we think that the really important …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/15 09:46 AM
3

Btw, how does men getting their penis cut off relate here. Does to affect their ability to work in construction or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 03:26 PM
3

A s you're going to cite those statistics with a link any minute now, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 03:24 PM
2

You're right. I've never seen a woman start a fight, a physical altercation, at work. Can't say the same about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 03:22 PM
2

How many women have not seen a man cry at work? Dunno, not a woman. However, I have seen both men and women cry at work. More women by percentage, yes, but the majority of both genders I have worked with have not cried at work. In any case, this seems to be an odd and somewhat aggressive point to raise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 02:57 PM
3

You should meet my current lady friend. Trained as a welder, graduated at the top of her class, joined the union - then never got any work, because employers didn't want women and other union members didn't want to work with women. Yeah, that still happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/15 02:46 PM
0

It may not be the way most people use it, but it is the correct meaning of the word. Discrimination is purposeful, while prejudice and its side effects can be subconscious.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:00 AM
1

Not at all. See my response to TheLordOfShit below. The legends of the difficulty of getting a scholarship if you are a white male are just that - legends. It's fairly hard to get a scholarship at all, and people who don't succeed in getting one like to blame that failure on forces outside their direct control.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:05 AM
1

Well, if you went and looked at the website I cited, or found the actual article, you would have seen this list, a small selection of the available scholarships that have no restrictions based on race, religion, nationality, state of origin, name, hair color, handedness, or any other random filter that some scholarships apply. Oh yes, these scholarships don't care about your GPA either. Zinch Weekly Scholarship Forget about grades or anything else, this $1,000 weekly contest is awarded based sol…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:00 AM
2

Here is an alternate perspective from an article on ScholarshipExperts: At least once a day, I see some tweet from a guy about how he can’t find any scholarships for average white males. Apparently, he hasn’t been looking very hard because there are tons of opportunities out there. I think many guys simply make the mistake of not taking the time to read the eligibility requirements, otherwise they would realize that most programs are open to just about everyone, including the average Joe. I know…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 03:01 PM
3

If it was debunked, it apparently was falsely debunked. This is from the Portland (Oregon) Craigslist right now: "I have three positive pregnancy tests (three different brands) from when I was pregnant last month before my miscarriage. I'm local in Portland and I would meet you at a neutral downtown location, cash only, no questions asked."
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:49 PM
1

Glad to see you finally edited the link to say YWCA instead of YMCA. Now, are you going to remove your downvotes?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:13 AM
0

Click the link you provided. Actually look at the website's graphics. It is the YWCA.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:06 PM
4

The Week Without Violence initiative is a YWCA created activity, not a YMCA activity. The YMCA supports the activity, but is not the primary creator or organizer of the WWV. As a test, try googling YMCA week without violence. The first link that pops up should be about the YWCAs WWV. IMO, there is way too much knee-jerk reacting in both feminist and men's rights discussions. Let's show that we, at least, can research the facts.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:37 PM
1

Dude. You linked to the YWCA website. All rants against the YMCA in relation to this are reacting to a false premise.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:29 PM
4

Will more people please read the article completely before posting headlines like this? According to the article, women still cheat less often than men. It is plainly and unambiguously state in the first three paragraphs - 15% of women cheat (or admit to cheating), while the same number for men is 20%. Sheesh.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 06:26 PM
-1

Can we please refrain from digging up 40 year old stories and presenting them as if they are recent? This article is from 1974, a year before I joined the army or graduated high school.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 08:42 PM
41

Wait. This is from 1974! It may be a bit late to fix this.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 08:40 PM
8

In fact, the linked PDF contains data that directly contradicts OPs "100,000 to 0" claim. Check table 46, where 10.6% of rapes of black females were by groups exclusively composed of white people. For me, at least, bogus interpretation of numbers makes me think the entire point is bogus.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 07:43 PM
1

Almost the only time I see Jezebel links is on twitter, where I follow a random selection if amusing and interesting folk. Facebook? Maybe once or twice a month, and always from the same four or five people.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:37 AM
61

At least remove the "Citizenship" line from the chart. If born here, you are a citizen, period. They can't retroactively remove your citizenship if you do not sign up.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:06 PM
41

This pattern is thousands of years old. Kill the men and boys (the perceived warriors and heads of households) and take the women for "wives" is as old as the Old Testament, and probably older. This is also not the first time that females have been abducted from schools. This is mentioned in one of the Wikipedia articles OP linked to - as is a reference to an earlier attack than the Sep 2013 massacre (July, 2013 I believe). Why did this one attack get so much attention? Partly random journalisti…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:36 PM
3

The correct second line is "Women cheat because women are assholes too."
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:53 PM
-4

Actually, that's not really the only reason. I can think of a few more based on people I have known: Traumatic fear: one woman I knew could literally not stay in or go into an enclosed location where there was an unfamiliar adult male. This was a psychological issue based on two different assaults with violence that happened to her - one while I knew her. Even though she was in therapy to resolve the issue, she couldn't successfully do this during the two years I knew her. Fear of "fat shaming".…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter