TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lauzon_ Archive

View 11 posts and 165 comments by Lauzon_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
237

FeminismLauzon_/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:22 AM
230

Anti-MRALauzon_/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:37 PM
199

AnalysisLauzon_/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:56 AM
109

OutrageLauzon_/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:49 AM
91

FeminismLauzon_/r/MensRights21/02/15 04:37 AM
85

DiscussionLauzon_/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:04 AM
46

Lauzon_/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:58 PM
22

AnalysisLauzon_/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:50 PM
10

StoryLauzon_/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:09 AM
9

AnalysisLauzon_/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:17 PM
3

DiscussionLauzon_/r/MensRights17/02/15 07:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You might be surprised by the number of anarchists and socialists who frequent this sub. Certainly not a majority but not an insignificant minority either. The association of hardcore feminism with the left is a recent phenomenon. One of the first major critiques of feminist theory came from the socialist Ernest Bax. Or take a look at early anarchists like Elizabeth Gurley Flynn. She flatly stated that "society moves in grooves of class, not sex." Lucy Parsons attributed the problems of women to…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:49 AM
-6

Nah, it's just a religion. "Ethnic" groups like Ashkenazi certainly have no claim to Palestine, if that's the nonsense you're driving at.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:18 AM
-1

You're "laughing out loud" at the deaths of millions of people killed by your government. How quaint. And how appalling. Google iraq waste treatment facilities or some such. Half a million Iraqi children died under Clinton alone. Unfortunately they didn't have access to water treatment facilities. You have a ridiculously naive view about states.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:21 AM
3

I'll dispute it. In Afghanistan, boys as young as five are required to work 12-14 hour days to support their mothers and sisters. Boys and men are the overwhelming victims of violence, both by foreign occupiers and domestic police/soldiers. Programs are created to uplift girls while ignoring boys. The reality is that both men and women have more sympathy for women and girls. It's just biology. Men are the disposable sex. So we naturally assume that atrocities committed against women are infinite…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:07 AM
2

That the reality is that in countries where women are treated like shit, [non elite] men are also treated like shit, arguably worse. We naturally have more sympathy for women, so we need to be careful to guard against this bias.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:01 AM
4

"sorry but women are not as privileged as men." Absolutely laughable. Read these stats and get back to me. (note that 99.9% of men are not CEO's, politicians or royalty). http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2xmm3p/i_cant_believe_people_think_we_dont_need_a_mens/ It's worth stressing the final link in that piece. Unlike women, men do not have in-group bias; in fact, like women, men favour other women over other men. This helps to explain why the feminist movement, unlike every dissident m…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:07 PM
7

Feminists are actively opposed to men's rights. Indeed they protest whenever men get together just to discuss issues like the boy crisis or male suicide. Why in the world do you think MRA's should NOT be hostile to feminism? (Ironically, many of the most prominent MRA's were former feminists. They realized that patriarchy theory is basically horseshit and began looking at areas where females are privileged and males disadvantaged. The rest is history).
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:43 PM
1

Interesting post. Are there any essays/books you have come across that expound upon this view? Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:31 PM
-5

I agree that it's an unfair comparison. The US has bombed 13 Muslim countries since 1980 and killed millions of Arabs. ISIS is small-time. In any case, the CIA has consistently funded extremist Islam as a means of preventing Arab nationalism. That's why these groups exist in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:17 PM
16

Feminism has ALWAYS been about granting women male privileges without corresponding responsibilities, and indeed refusing to even acknowledge female privileges, let alone expanding them to men. It's a female supremacist movement. Period.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:13 PM
24

Since this was front-paged I'm gonna hijack the top post and link to the work of Karen Straughan. She posts here occasionally and will hopefully chime in on this thread. Me a feminist? No way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8 Is Feminism hate? [skip to the 20 min. mark] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDYAVROaIcs How Feminism conned society https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RozEFVPDxeg Benevolent sexism? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VupEC0cAWo The Tyranny of Female Hypoagency https:…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:04 PM
1

Sure thing genius. You're basically concocting a fantastical fairy tail in order to avoid the obvious.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:22 AM
5

In case y'all haven't figured it out yet, feminism WILL be used to censor the Internet.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:14 AM
4

While this may be true of some male feminists, it is definitely not true of all. I'm an athletic type, never had any problems with women, but I was a feminist up until a few years ago. I simply hadn't been exposed to the counter-arguments. I believed that women were an oppressed class historically. I had no idea that feminist groups were manufacturing bogus stats. I hadn't read any feminist literature. It was just a dumb accident that I stumbled across a video by Karen Straughan. I suspect that …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:21 AM
-21

Anyone who would quote Dan Savage aka Dan Keenan is pretty much an idiot. Having said that, yeah Keenan is right that sexism/racism has diminished over time. Why is Dan Savage STILL an idiot? -- Because he promotes bigotry against other groups.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:44 AM
5

Added an edit.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 04:39 AM
0

A lot of bigotry against Muslims in this episode, as well as overall ignorance regarding the Middle East and Western/Israeli policy in the region. In case anyone has forgotten, there are 1 billion Muslims in the world. Karen, in-between her incoherent ramblings about communism, did make a good point regarding Female power in Muslim nations. It's far greater that we are led to believe. It apparently never occurred to the other Badgers that feminism is being used as a weapon in the ongoing demoniz…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:18 AM
0

Okay. So I'm being downvoted simply for introducing factual information. Nicely done, Reddit/MensRights.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:13 AM
-1

It's called archeology. Read the paper.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:27 AM
1

The worldwide archaeological record contradicts the presumption that early humanity lived in a Hobbesian war of all against all. There is no evidence of warfare anywhere on the planet older than the ten-thousand- to twelve-thousand-year mark. In addition, numerous archaeological sequences show the birth of war on a regional scale occurred within the last ten thousand years. Richard Lee and Richard Daly have likewise observed, in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers (2000), that no…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:43 AM
-3

"And keep in mind that even in the "egalitarian" hunter gatherer societies of millennia ago, men were the ones who died by the spear to protect women." Wars are a recent invention. "The whole argument rests on the assumption, never proven and much in dispute, that violence and warfare have diminished since the Neolithic transition. This is, for the most part, progressivist and Panglossian bullshit coming from people like Steven Pinker. In “Pinker’s List: Exaggerating Prehistoric War Mortality” (…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:00 AM
-1

Idiot, I just finished saying that it was "awful" to take advantage of someone who is drunk. That doesn't change the fact that people are responsible for their own actions. If women need men to take care of them, then the laws will need to be changed accordingly.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:59 AM
3

Top-rated post ;) "I had to take a class in college (I think it was Humanities or some stupid thing like that, it was like 20 years ago) where the female "professor" was saying about the same things. I said I can prove otherwise, and she challenged me. Next class I brought in my friend's pet tarantula and every last female in that classroom completely freaked out, some even ran out of the room screaming. I proved my point.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:52 AM
-3

If a man -- or woman -- gets smashed and smashes a car -- it's HIS OR HER fault. It's awful to take advantage of a drunk woman (or man), but assuming someone didn't drug her (or him), SHE or HE is liable. The only alternative is to bring back chaperones. If women can't take care of themselves, then men will have to take care of them. This will require a restructuring of the legal system. FREEDOM -- love it or leave it.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:30 PM
5

She's a racist. She is openly discriminating against students. She should be fired. Period.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:53 AM
5

Please understand, I'm not trying to appease your emotions. Life sucks. Yes, men are "profoundly" more victimized in pretty much every area of society. Don't believe me? Check out the statistics that matter, like being the victim of a violent crime, work-place life expectancy, life expectancy period. Etc. Etc. It's comfortable to blame it all on men as a collective, but you know damn well that females have been playing Lady MacBeth since we crawled out of the swamp. If men are guilty for trying …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:09 AM
2

You seem pretty absurd to me too kid. You'll learn, eventually.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:27 AM
2

Thanks for the message.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 07:02 AM
4

Uh-huh. Word of advice: come up with something better than "I feel bad" next time you argue. Might just help you in future. For the record, Alison Tiemen feels pretty much the same way I do. She detests the "lack of agency" argument promoted by feminists, wherein men are supposed to rescue damsels in distress. It's insulting to women. Suck it up kiddo.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:56 AM
10

I've seen a lot of posts that imply or directly state that women have more power and privilege than men, and that men are harassed and victimized on a level equal to women. The general consensus, unless I'm mistaken, is that men are PROFOUNDLY more "harassed and victimized" than women, at least in modern Western society. This is borne out by the stats in pretty much every area. Even rape, for Pete's sake (due to the disproportionate targeting of men by the legal system, and prison rape, which is…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:01 AM
5

Just added this in an edit: Edit: This article was actually sent to me by Znet, a fairly long standing leftist publication with a wide readership. So it was probably sent to a great many others as well, not only in the US but around the world. I encourage people to email the editor Michael Albert at [email protected]. Article is now at the top of the "featured" section: https://zcomm.org/znet/ Enraged emails will just reinforce the idiocy laid out in the article, and accusing them of being "cultura…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:13 AM
2

People are reluctant to call themselves MRA's due to misinformation spread by feminists but yes the issues are receiving more and more attention. I've never broached gender politics with my family yet my sister (speaking of her son) remarked to me the other day how "boys have it so much harder than girls now" in school. I was also shocked recently when a gay anarchist friend emailed me a link to one of Karen Straughan's videos. As for MGTOW's, they are a rapidly growing phenomenon even if most m…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:28 PM
1

Here here.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:32 AM
1

No I think femocide exists, however not due to misogyny. Amongst the extremely poor in the third world, boys are often more valuable than girls (conversely, amongst the extremely rich in the first world, it could be argued that girls are more valuable than boys -- hence the Sara Silverman add). Boys are stronger and besides are required to support their grand-parents. Karen Straughan discussed this in one of her videos. So yeah, femocide exists, and during times of extreme hardship I reckon that…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:24 AM
3

The Montreal killings back in the 70's were indeed a massacre, and the guy was politically motivated by anti-feminism. Though also obviously deranged. However, people have supposedly been motivated to kill by Twinkies. A couple of kids tried to blame Oliver Stone's "Natural Born Killers" for their killing spree. And so on. Feminists have attempted to link scumbag nuts like George Sordini and Elliot Rodgers with MRA's. However there is no link. At all. There's a stronger link between Rodgers and …
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:10 AM
4

Yes, yes and yes.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:45 AM
13

Wouldn't the proper term be androcide? In fact didn't Wiki used to have a page on that item? Edit: a google search produces: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androcide ...which redirects to gendercide. I could have sworn that the original entry was MUCH longer, and indeed should be, considering that men are the overwhelming victims of war and genocide, for obvious reasons (fighting ability, male disposability). Edit 2: The "gendercide" page focusses primarily on femocide, which is a real phenomeno…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:05 AM
3

Ironically, it is feminists, not men, who are to blame for these irrational fears. Young women are told that there is a one in five chance they will be raped, so they become hyper-vigilant to the point of paranoia. Feminism is a campaign of terrorism not only against men but women.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:04 AM
-12

Marxism communism REDS! derp derp
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:03 AM
1

To your opponent: You can't have one without the other, kid.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:09 AM
1

You idiot. Did you forget about Brzezinski? Seriously?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 02:01 PM
2

Fatuous. Look it up. You celebrate American foreign policy without having the slightest inclination that anything could be wrong. You're an idiot. You're an imbecile. You're a fucking moron. Not even the folks at the Pentagon embrace your worldview. Sorry.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:38 PM
3

Kid, learn about foreign policy 101. You're way out of your league.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:36 PM
-1

Sounds like you're trying to demonize masculinity, ie the means by which we survive. And the means by which men have workplace "accidents" -- 90%, to keep the electricity on. And that includes supporting your sorry ass. Well fuck you. And fuck all your feminist nonsense. Clear, dipshit?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:16 PM
3

Has it ever occurred to you that you're backing both? ;) Hell, the NY Times says as much.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:08 PM
1

Probably because men are the overwhelming majority of prisoners -- receive 64% of the punishment of females, are twice as likely to be arrested etc. Just guessing. But maybe you support torture?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:48 PM
21

Excellent rebuttal. I hope that these silly self-flagelating men can be reached. It's the boys I'm worried about. Boys are being taught to hate themselves.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:27 PM
0

Your idiocy derives from the fact that you think the "Guardian" etc. are "leftist." Lol. They're liberal publications, obviously, designed to keep capitalism runnin' strong. Read Chomsky. You'll figure it out eventually.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:30 AM
2

Nicely done! ;)
/r/MensRights01/03/15 11:15 AM
-3

Do you feel the same way about the US army? Or the Canadian armed forces? Because the US/NATO has killed millions of people in the region, for reasons outlined in eg "The Grand Chessboard" by Brzezinski and PNAC; whereas ISIS is just starting out; indeed ISIS was/is a predictable outgrowth of US/Israeli/NATO imperialism. It's not rocket science. If you bomb an entire region, if you destroy hydro-electric damns and water filtration systems, if you create death squads that target dissidents and un…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 10:25 AM
-1

Yawn.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 04:12 AM
2

Also wanted to say: that's one beautiful cat! Sorry, feminists, was that "objectification"?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 04:03 AM
2

I think the general argument is that the MRM was ignored until people like Paul Elam started stirring the pot and writing outlandish satire in order to provoke. I'm not convinced, personally, but then again I don't run a huge MRM website and live off the proceeds. The more immediate concern is that AVFM is clearly trying to advance a far-right political agenda. You may or may not care about that, but I do.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 03:55 AM
6

bingo.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 03:46 AM
3

It's rather telling that a (righteous) thread on Wikipedia bias gets about 600X more votes than this post, which outlines the torture of men in prison. I do in fact think that the feminists have a good argument in this respect: it is revealed by the fact that AVFM currently links to a shabby performance on the part of the Green Party in England. What the fuck does this have to do with men's rights? Does AVFM actually think that a Conservative Government, or a Labour Party Government, will help m…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 03:16 AM
9

Uh-huh. Here's an article on feminism, in which I attempt to link feminism to the latest female nut job who kills all her kids. Still fair? Of course not. Piss off.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 02:49 AM
3

Save teh womminz! Bomb the Muslims! Ignore the fact that the US has consistently supported radical Muslims in order to prevent Arab secular nationalism. Fucking dolts.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 02:46 AM
8

Is that why he mentioned Elliot Rodgers in the second paragraph? To others: don't click. Ignore.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:25 AM
2

Indeed. There's a fascinating book by Alfie Kohn entitled "No Contest: The Case Against Competition." It challenges a lot of the biodeterminist stuff as advocated by (non-experts) like Steven Pinker (whose work has been savaged by anthropologists and archaeologists, though unsurprisingly celebrated by the NY Times and other dominant media for its apologetics concerning war -- the ultimate form of competition). http://www.amazon.ca/No-Contest-Case-Against-Competition/dp/0395631254 Review here: ht…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 01:00 AM
6

Another article by a clueless woman demanding that men get back on the plantation. "(1) Graduate from high school, (2) work hard, and (3) get married before you have children. It is not complicated; it really is that simple." Uh, no. Men respond to incentives. Not shaming language. Young males are engaging in a simple cost-benefit analysis. Marriage is an incredibly raw deal. What use is it to slave all day to support your wife (and women in general, via the state) only to have her run off with …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 07:05 PM
1

I think you and I probably agree more than we disagree, Agree. "The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It could be well recommended as a counterintelligence movement to weaken the revolutionary movement." This was from an August, 1969 report by the head of the San Francisco FBI office. Bam.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:01 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:51 AM
1

Those are some pretty good points. A major problem here is tribalism. We evolved in tribes and we have an instinctual compulsion to protect members of our (perceived) tribe. Yet we can also be divided on conquered on this basis. A fact which ruling classes have recognized throughout history. Feminists are fiercely protective of the term "feminist." Well, I don't think that most men/women here care much about labels. We just want some recognition of female privilege and areas where men and boys a…
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:05 AM
1

Again, no leftist who cares about working people and the poor actually supports Hillary. You're thinking of Democrats/liberals.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:49 AM
4

It is already happening. We don't need to wait ten years. Yes, the deck is stacked, but we are making rapid progress despite weekly hit pieces in the MSM.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:17 AM
18

Welcome! Alison's work is superb. I particularly enjoy her material on how feminism infantilizes women. We've all heard about how "teh patriarchy harms men too!!!!". Well, it turns out that feminism is pretty harmful to women as well as men.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:04 AM
1

Venezuela has only been subjected to three US-sponsored coups in the past decade. How would you like that, you piece of shit? And how would you like hoarding goods and relying on the fucking IMF and World Bank? You make me sick.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 06:13 AM
1

I agree with your post.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:56 AM
2

"So libertarian minded conservatives like Rand Paul,Ted Cruz,Mike Lee and Thomas Massie are against the people?" Yes. They're interested in their finances, and not much else. Do you think that statist democrats like Biden,Pelosi,Obama,Feinstein and Reid have the people's best interest in mind?" I certainly do not. Both parties are scum. In fact some of the "Founding Fathers" argued against political parties for precisely this reason ;)
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:33 AM
2

Another thing: we're not dealing here with an oppressed group. Feminists have billions in resources, making the feminist movement on par with the Oil lobby and the Agro lobby and the Israeli lobby. It is not a matter of egalitarianism, either, that ship has sailed. We're dealing with a billion dollar industry (represented by Emma Watson's speech being funded by JP Morgan) vs. a "Men's Rights Movement" that had its first conference in Detroit. It is the responsibility of feminists to make concess…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:20 AM
2

The Democratic Party is certainly misandrist. But obviously not leftist. A leftist would not support allowing corporations to govern all of our affairs. Google TPP, currently being fast-tracked by Obama: Global Trade Watch (GTW) monitors TPP developments. It calls it “a stealthy policy being pressed by corporate America. (It’s) a dream of the 1%.” It will: offshore millions of American jobs, free the banksters from [any remaining] oversight, ban Buy America policies needed to create green (and m…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:36 AM
1

"it's a phenomenon you can observe in virtually every group. Moderate members rarely, if ever, decry the overreaches of their radicals." I'm not so sure about that. Take Anarchists. There is a very lively debate amongst anarchists over whether "black bloc" tactics are actually useful, or whether they reinforce stereotypes that anarchists desire chaos, and end up hurting non-violent protesters. There's also much debate on the not-so-minor issue of agent provocateurs... Or take the civil rights mo…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:51 AM
4

I don't read the National Review. But I just googled it and found this: “We don’t need a war on international poverty, we need a war on the evil that is radical Islamic terrorism,” Jindal said. “These individuals are going to go straight to hell, exactly where they belong.” He continued to chastise the president for refusing to properly identify the enemy, and added that Americans should feel comfortable teaching their children about American exceptionalism. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:35 AM
2

"the views of the most vocal minority of feminists" Where are the "majority" of feminists, then? Why don't they criticize blatant misandrists like Amanda Marcotte and Jessica Valenti and the charming personalities at Jezebel? I keep hearing about these "good feminists" who are fully onboard with equality, but I never hear about them calling out their wayward sisters. I do agree with you that most "feminists" (ie the coffee-shop variety) believe that they are promoting "equal rights." I doubt tha…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:22 AM
1

"while I understand that there will likely always be a need for specialized rights groups, my hope is that feminists and MRAs will eventually merge into a "humanist" or "egalitarian" movement that prioritizes the rights of all genders equally." Agree. "Feminism really did enable us all to think about ourselves outside of gender norms" Disagree. People have been "thinking outside of gender norms" since forever. Native Americans, for example, recognized "two-spirit people." http://www.amazon.ca/Tw…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:00 AM
5

On this particular forum, that's been my experience. For every post condemning the right there are about ten condemning the left. As I said, some of said criticism of the left is justified. It's also worth noting that Americans tend to be extremely confused about what actually constitutes "the left." Traditionally, the left focussed primarily on class. The Democratic leadership, which supports killing people without trial, indefinite detention, endless war, corporate "free trade" agreements that…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 02:46 AM
2

I disagree. I think a distinction needs to be made between the broader "manosphere," which includes sites like Return of Kings and subreddits like The Red Pill, vs. the MRM. That's one of the reasons it was so idiotic of AVFM to glorify Roosh V. I don't give a shit what feminists think, and I have no problem with "game" theorists, who are simply trying to help men get laid, but celebrating the misogynistic authoritarian right was a dumb, dumb move. A significant strategic blunder. I may not agre…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 02:22 AM
8

It's deceptive, because a lot of right-wingers go out of their way to attack "liberals" and "leftists," while "liberals" and "leftists" generally try to keep things non partisan (I'm an exception). To be fair, the left DOES deserve criticism on the subject of feminism, just as the right deserves criticism for promoting some anti-male policies (attacks on unions, which lower wages; promoting war, which kills primarily men; "tough on [blue collar] crime" rhetoric and "3 strikes" policies, which di…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:50 AM
2

Here's another gem: "Because mankind is intrinsically wicked, he has to be governed. Such governance can only be established, however, when men are united – and they can only be united against other people." Leo Strauss
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:17 AM
3

If you think "MSNBC" is "left wing" you really need to read a book on leftist politics. Hint: liberals are not leftists. While you're at it, read PNAC's "Rebuilding American Defences," the precursor to PNAC. It's all right there in black and white. Here's Leo Strauss, the godfather of the Neoconservative movement: "Because Germany has turned to the right and has expelled [Jews], it simply does not follow that the principles of the right are therefore to be rejected… only on the basis of principl…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:09 AM
2

Read "The Project for the New American Century." It will disabuse you of such fallacies. Neoconservatism is based fundamentally on a permanent war economy and "full spectrum dominance." Leo Strauss explicitly advocated keeping populations frightened of an "external threat" in order to achieve social cohesion. It's not much different than traditional fascism. Indeed "neo-fascist" would be a much better descriptor than "neo-conservative." There is nothing conservative about modern Republicans (or …
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:00 AM
4

Watch "The Power of Nightmares." Neo-conservatism is based on the philosophy of Leo Strauss, who argued that social cohesion can only be achieved by fear of an external threat. If such a threat didn't exist, it had to be manufactured. He supported a perpetual war state, elimination of civil liberties, attacks against the left, and the promotion of "traditional family values." He also believed that leaders should present themselves as religious, even if they were atheists, in order to sucker the …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:39 PM
7

I've been reading this forum for about six months. My interpretation of the political breakdown: a slight majority of people here are liberals, followed by conservatives and right-libertarians, followed by socialists and anarchists (left-libertarians); only about 5-10% are of the authoritarian right (neocons/neofascists) and the authoritarian left (communists/Stalinists). Unfortunately, right authoritarians are highly over-represented in the "manosphere" in general (Red Pill, Return of Kings etc…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:30 PM
4

Fair enough. "Feminists" appear to want to rob women of agency in a manner that "patriarchy" never could... BTW I think your material is awesome.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:24 AM
1

Molyneux freedom train, Molyneaux is a right-libertarian, not an anarchist.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:21 AM
4

Honestly Alison, I don't think you need to worry about that. The cat is out of the bag. Men really don't want to oppress women. Men love women. There's no "war" going on. Feminists declared war against men, and men have no desire to fight back. The MRM is basically just men saying, "Okay, enough is enough. Can we try for some fairness here?" I suppose there is a theoretical possibility of Inuit-style "patriarchy," but the bottom line is that men will always want to please women. Even amongst the…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 01:58 AM
1

Conservatives have supported: slavery, treating workers like slaves, various other forms of slavery, any sort of real democracy; they have also opposed: racial equality, not killing people for being gay, living wages, minimum wages, a real 'free market', peace, and justice. Trying to claim the moral high ground for the one thing that conservatives got right (feminism) is absolutely laughable.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:56 AM
2

Thanks for this.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:16 AM
13

The feminists did a very clever thing: they aligned themselves with legitimately "oppressed" groups. And most of us swallowed it due to apex fallacy. The "New Left" in the 60's/70's had no idea what sort of fire they were playing with; men are strong and women are weak; Right? Ditto CIA when it funded Ms. Magazine. I don't think there was very much Machiavellian subterfuge involved, at least not amongst street level feminists; their FEELZ taught them that they were "oppressed", and the rest is h…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:12 AM
3

...which would be fine, provided she wasn't simultaneously demanding -- and with the full force of the state -- that men ACT as "simpering wimps." The problem is not that women are attracted to masculine men. The problem is that feminists are demanding that men act in the manner of females, then rejecting said men for behaving exactly as they demand. I mean, surely you can see the problem in demanding one thing then rewarding its opposite? Easy solution: get rid of the state. It is only the supr…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:01 AM
13

She acknowledges the conflict, but wants her cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 09:20 AM
3

The phrase "if you can't stand the heat stay outta the kitchen" leaps to mind ;)
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:57 AM
3

Nice vid by Paul Joseph Watson. Can't say I agree with much of the stuff that appears on Infowars, but in this case his argument is sound.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:27 AM
1

Internalized misandry.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:11 AM
8

"Online abuse" = people challenging them with facts. Plus some false flag "harassment" and a handful of teenage boys trolling. If you're gonna make it your job in life to spread hatred against men and boys you'll have to deal with some mean tweets. Cry me a river.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:43 AM
-9

Roosh is a little girl. And a fascist. Definitely NOT an MRA. He doesn't have the balls.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 02:11 AM
1

Yes Choco, I agree with you on those points.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:56 AM
1

I support the idea of "free markets." Which means that I do not support capitalism. Wage-slavery has never existed without the state, nor could it. I encourage you to read about mutualism.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 10:39 PM
1

Anyone who supports these witch hunts must be held personally accountable.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:48 PM
3

That was brilliant.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:32 PM
2

Otter Jesus!? Otter...Jesus. Yeah that works actually. Plus (s)he gets to walk on water and all, and there's tons of wine.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 08:26 PM
1

Kids raised on video games. You haven't ANY idea that YOUR government has been overthrowing governments around the world, sparking rage. ...And you accuse others of being ignorant. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:15 PM
1

"This is a common thing faced by women in Iran" Are you even aware than the US guv overthrew the democratically elected government in Iran? I mean, are you even aware of that?
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:02 PM
2

Kid, gynocentrism is as old as time. Feminism is merely an update on old forms. As for Iran, you evidently think that the womenz there are being teh oppressed! Sonny, both men and women are oppressed in Iran. And America. And so on. Show a little humility. Try to learn things about other cultures. Try, try and try again -- keep trying. You'll get it eventually.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:39 PM
21

Bitch, pick one or the other. Most men are happy to serve women. Just don't pretend that you're "strong and independent" while males provide your plumbing and electricity.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:21 PM
2

"Women are treated like children in many ways" Indeed. Thanks to feminism. Because we all know that when a woman has a drink that she becomes child-like, and that the nearest male adult human should take responsibility for the poor female. "They are forced to dress a certain way." Nonsense. Granted, sexy women can more easily manipulate men, but that's really all this is: capability to manipulate men. Where is the personal responsibility? "The punishment is harsh for women who don't act how they…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:40 PM
0

Delete.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 01:20 PM
6

In case you haven't figured it out yet, all of the top level politicians/CEO's are psychopaths. You'd have to be.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 12:19 PM
3

Karen Straughan has spoken eloquently on this subject. Unlike certain right wing feminists who -- despite their excellent advocacy in opposition to "rape culture" etc. -- have blithely condemned the Muslim world as "misogynist." Karen refuses to use female suffering as an excuse for imperialism and condemnation of a massive culture comprising 1 billion people. Whenever you find a country where women are treated like shit, take a look at how men are treated. Ten times out of ten you find that men…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 11:34 AM
1

Nope. Feminism began as a far-right institution. The original suffragettes were opposed to universal suffrage -- and demanded voting rights for rich white women only. So you're wrong. Period.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 11:21 AM
10

Karen accurately describes feminism as a totalitarian ideology that is currently stripping men of rights. The other woman is all over the place. She claims: "Marxism called for the equality of women, but this equality was positioned in a context of social utility and a life that belongs to society and the state. Capitalism, on other hand, came as a force for prosperity and self-determination, but women still faced barriers to participating in the emergent capitalist system at every step of real-…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:59 PM
5

Very depressing. On the other hand, this fiasco may represent an opportunity. Forget about AVFM. It's just a website. Why not create a non-far-right-wing MRA website that really represents Men's Rights? People of all political persuasions?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:21 AM
-4

Hehe...Fascism is the merger of state and corporate power. According to Mussolini. Fascist movements throughout Europe were vigorously supported by plutocrats across the continent and even in the US. Indeed Churchill himself praised fascism in its infancy. But the cultural ethos is also vital, and necessarily presages or gives justification to far-right wing policy. The fascist ethos involves nationalism, scapegoating minorities, and "rescuing" a culture in decline from the forces of the left in…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:52 AM
-3

Whatever you say Benedict Arnold ;) They can dress it up however they like. It's blatant fascist garbage. Hits all of the same themes as the original fascist movements. Minus a big-time funder like Prescott Bush. But the themes are almost exactly the same.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:02 AM
-2

"Roosh isn't a fascist." Hatred against women, gays, persecuted minorities, labour unions; celebrating empty machismo and war and corporatism. Even hating on the MRM -- of which you laughably claim to be a part. Who's being emotional? The authoritarian right is the scum of the earth. My grandfather was killed by fascists like you. And I will not, for a second, play PC with douche bags like this Roosh, or his imbecilic followers.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:00 AM
1

Well, a lot of people aren't happy with promoting fascist beliefs. So there it is.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:57 AM
5

One thing that is definitely NOT dignified is embracing totalitarian ideology that attacks Men's Rights while claiming to be an MRA. I have no problem with "game." It's just Cosmo for men.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:56 AM
-1

Great. The Red Pill is another sub/R, however. There's probably also a fascist sub.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:55 AM
3

Um, yeah, when people attack women, gays, minorities, labor unions etc., celebrate shallow machismo, talk of "social decline" and the need for purifying totalitarian government, and praise corporate and state leaders, that's fascism.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:53 AM
-5

I take fascist types very, very seriously. I consider them more dangerous than any other single group in society. History shows that previously marginal fascists can come to power very quickly given the right conditions. You think it's no big deal that the major men's rights website is promoting this stuff -- I disagree.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:27 PM
5

I certainly won't be donating to them again.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:15 PM
3

Fascists piss me off. As they do most people. Hell these guys are even worse than fascists -- they are neo-monarchists. Americans fought a war of independence over that minor issue. This isn't the Red Pill. This is Men's Rights. The fact that AVFM is attempting to lionize this piece of shit is troubling, especially given that he is a staunch opponent of the Men's Rights Movement (!) This episode leaves me to believe that critics of the MRM are at least partly correct. A lot of people involved in…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:13 PM
4

You know what's a bitch move? Fawning over a crackpot who repeatedly attacks the men's rights movement -- on a forum supposedly devoted to men's rights. Show a little dignity for God's sake.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:21 PM
12

Return of Kings A few recent articles include: Is Democracy Dying? History's convincing arguments in favor of monarchy In Praise of Alpha Male Bill Clinton The Timeless Wisdom of Louix IX I'd rather try to work it out with the goddamn feminists than these fascist crackpots. Here's another recent article: The Men's Rights Movement is no Place for Men http://www.returnofkings.com/7877/the-mens-rights-movement-is-no-place-for-men Bravo AVFM. Bravo.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 12:35 PM
-6

Great. Perhaps they should invite a spokesperson on from the KKK next. After all, we're supposed to be "celebrating dissenting opinions." The Klan may actually be more reasonable than the ROK crowd. At least the Klan doesn't advocate a literal return to monarchy. Moreover, the ROK website frequently posts articles that ATTACK the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:46 AM
3

Hedges is from the Christian anarchist tradition a la Dorothy Day. So it's understandable that he finds pornography offensive. I agree with him that real relationships are vastly preferable. PROVIDED such relationships exist on the basis of something approaching equality -- which is damn difficult in this day and age. The problem is that he is not recognizing the environment that feminism has created for young men. They are taught to hate their masculinity, so they behave in a more feminine mann…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:22 AM
5

Ouch...I think a feminist's head just exploded.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:29 AM
1

I think we all know where this headed: massive online censorship.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 04:54 AM
4

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 04:51 AM
6

There is absolutely no point in arguing with feminists unless you have an audience of people who could potentially be swayed by your views. It's similar to arguing with creationists or cult members.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:35 AM
3

I don't think dead Afghans care who we think is more oppressed than the other, I think they want us to stop killing them. On that score we are in complete agreement. Interestingly, there have been leaked CIA docs indicating that "save the womenz!" is a major propaganda effort. In Afghanistan and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:45 AM
2

Ironically, the strongest women are the most feminine. The freest societies have the strongest gender roles. We lived 99.9% of our history in hunter-gatherer bands. Women are no less powerful than men.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:39 AM
6

Okay, so this guy has basically skirted the most important question, namely whether he agrees with Patriarchy Hypothesis: the theory that men are the "actors" and women are delicate little flowers with no agency, who have been oppressed throughout all of history etc. In other words, feminism infantilizes women. He did say -- in contrast to most feminist theory -- that "Both men and women have certain privileges and inequalities." I guess that's a step forward. But it's not enough.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:49 AM
3

Men are simply responding to observed phenomena. They find that, in stark contrast to what women claim, females are more attracted to assholes than nice, submissive men. However, you're absolutely right that simply being an "asshole" is not what is attractive to women -- rather it is the faux-confidence that asshole-ishness entails. It is entirely possible to be a confident nice guy. The problem is that men are being beaten down in this society, robbing them of confidence. In hunter-gatherer ban…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:19 AM
1

I am concerned that MRAs can fall folly to the same bullshit as women's lib. It's possible but not likely. You have to remember that men don't actually desire to "oppress" women. This is a myth. We desire to protect women. It's understandable that women are frightened of male oppression, but I just don't see it happening. Even in countries like Afghanistan, where women have an incredibly shitty deal, men and boys (arguably) have it even worse. Boys as young as 6 are expected to work to support t…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:07 AM
5

Here Here. Although your statement that "MRAs are a gender polarized parody of feminism" is inaccurate. One could make that argument about some MGTOW's, who have a bad habit of generalizing women, but the MRM represents men standing up and saying "enough." We have been putting up with this abuse for 150 years. The MRM is entirely necessary and should be supported by all women who care about men and boys. We are NOT out to harm women or take away their rights. We have no interest in forcing women…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:24 AM
7

Well, I wish you luck. Truthfully, I think most MRA's would be happy to partner with women who sincerely believe in equal rights even if they insist on calling themselves feminists. The problem is that there is absolutely no "give" on the other side. Everything is viewed through a gynocentric lens. Men's problems are reduced to not being womanly enough, even as women rely on men to be brave and strong in order to ensure their survival. This is grotesquely unfair, if not downright sadistic.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:04 AM
10

"Both men and women have certain privileges and inequalities." This seems to be the standard MRA view. However I have seldom encountered feminists who have been willing to admit the same; if they do, they claim it is because men themselves have caused the problem ("patriarchy hurts men too", and the ridiculous corollary, "benevolent sexism"). Has this been your experience as well? Do you agree with the premise that male problems are caused by "patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:10 AM
8

Are you a feminist? Are you male or female? How do you feel about patriarchy hypothesis? Ie the idea that, throughout history, men have set up systems to privilege other men at the expense of women?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:42 AM
7

Feminism is an ideal divide and conquer mechanism. This is why, unlike so many dissident groups in history, elites have actively supported it rather than crushed it. Men are the ones who lead revolutions, and feminism aids in creating a weak, dispirited, easily imprisoned male populace. The women, for their part, are also rendered benign because they are either looking for trivial offences or blaming men for their problems when they could be (potentially) learning about class issues. Feminists p…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:50 AM
7

"The MRM has become a necessity and important variable in the equation of equality, and with your help and understanding that both genders have problems, and both genders have privileges, we can move forward toward a future of equality." It is absolutely staggering, and indeed contemptible, that feminists refuse to acknowledge something so bloody obvious.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:55 PM
19

"Do most business introductions include a comment about how attractive someone finds you?" Sargon: "No, I don't carry the heavy burden of being an attractive person. If you want to decrease your attractiveness, a straight edged razor costs 59 cents." Lol. Great vid. These women are so privileged they don't even realize how ridiculous they sound. If they had to live the life of your average man they would have a nervous breakdown within a week. Here's another gem: "If capitalist patriarchy oppres…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:50 PM
11

Article ends: (3) This story also points to a genuinely chilling climate of conformity and intimidation on college campuses. K.C. Johnson has already written about the article by former Columbia Spectator opinion editor Daniel Agristo admitting that the paper’s coverage of the Sulkowicz story has been hobbled by fear of being perceived as insensitive to sexual assault survivors. During my interviews with Nungesser and his parents, they madetwo other startling claims that did not make it into the…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:52 PM
1

Yep. It's been banned. But not in the subconscious minds of feminists.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 08:00 AM
2

The interesting thing about this is that there is absolutely no reason that female teachers need to be any less competent than their male counterparts. But they frequently are. I remember it myself growing up. Many (not all) female teachers are completely clueless about how to deal with boys. It's unsurprising. Since feminism posits that gender is a mere social construct, why are so many boys comparatively unruly? Why can't they be more like girls and sit quietly at their desks? It must be a fau…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:21 AM
3

The history of US government experimentation on American citizens is horrifying and almost unbelievable. Unsurprisingly few people are even aware of it. If you have a strong stomach there is a documentary on this called "Human Resources." As usual men were the primary victims (especially soldiers and prisoners) but there were plenty of female victims as well, especially psychiatric patients. http://metanoia-films.org/human-resources/
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:27 AM
35

I should add that the quote attributed to Gillian Anderson is actually from the character played by Gillian Anderson in the popular serial killer miniseries "The Fall," which millions of teenage girls are devouring as we speak. The actor who plays the serial killer will also star as the billionaire in the film adaptation of "50 shades of grey." After attempting to rape the Anderson character, a repentant man asks, “Why are women emotionally and spiritually so much stronger than men?” [seriously,…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:46 AM
2

upvoted for "sneakycraft."
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:09 AM
5

It's certainly watchable and reasonably well made, often entertaining, but the misandry is unmistakable and sometimes overwhelming. The men are either violent rapey bastards or incompetent; we are treated to lines about men being defective as a sex; and the main character (played by Anderson) is herself an overt misandrist. Now, we could argue that it is just the character who is misandrist, not the show itself, but the other elements I mentioned make that interpretation difficult to swallow. An…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:49 AM
1

Bravo!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:53 PM
4

"Kate Smurthwaite was booked to do a stand-up show at Goldsmith College, until students who belonged to the Goldsmith Feminist Society threatened to form a picket line if Kate’s gig was allowed. Their reason? While Kate is a feminist, these students disagreed with her position on decriminalising sex work." Eating their own...
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:14 PM
15

Her recent television program "The Fall" is quite possibly the most misandrist piece of work I've come across outside of the works of Andrea Dworkin.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:07 PM
1

Agree with you for the most part, but it's true that the CIA funded Ms. Magazine, which is...odd. While I don't think there was some sort of deliberate attempt to "break up the family," there may have been a deliberate attempt to replace class analysis (which is threatening to moneyed interests) with patriarchy theory. If you think this outlandish, consider that the CIA funded abstract expressionism as a means of replacing "social realist" art, which was deemed subversive for its portrayal of wo…
/r/MGTOW10/02/15 05:25 AM
8

“Get any group of women together and you can be sure they’ll talk about their husbands — and it will rarely be complimentary.” Wow. And this despite the fact that "respect" is the number one most important quality for men in a relationship (as a recent study indicated).
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:41 AM
51

Edit: Someone on Infowars wrote: "The domain was registered less than a month ago by someone in Australia through a domain privacy company." Unless someone is able to provide a last name to "Lana" the story should be assumed to be fake.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:38 AM
4

Now on the conspiracy website info wars. http://www.infowars.com/feminist-i-aborted-my-baby-because-he-was-male/ This will probably become a big story, assuming it gets properly verified. Could still be bullshit. Edit: probably is bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:36 AM
18

I saw this when the first article was posted and assumed it was bullshit. Apparently it's real (?) Wow. It's pretty awful to see how feminism is playing out in the younger generation. I guess it shouldn't be surprising that if you raise girls under the belief that men have been "oppressing women throughout all of history!" that they may develop hostile feelings toward the opposite sex. Saying "but we're only interested in equality! -- check the dictionary" doesn't quite cut it. In her words: “I …
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:28 AM
23

The banks seem to have missed that memo ;)
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:30 PM
3

Ten false rape accusations I can understand. But eleven? ;) Why the fuck wasn't this bitch sent off to the loony bin after the second false accusation? Pussy pass on steroids.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:00 PM
245

Pulling a Sarkeesian. Don't ever let it be said that feminism is anti-capitalist. Shit is profitable as hell.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:58 PM
2

This woman belongs in a loony bin along with Jessica Valenti. Instead she's actually paid to write her hate-speech. I think it's important for these supposed "progressives" to understand something: they are on the wrong side of history. They will be remembered in the same manner as the bigots who opposed civil rights legislation. Men have had enough. We will no longer be used as punching bags by mentally deranged feminists.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:36 PM
1

It's really a shame, because there are a lot of positive things about the Nordic countries. Unfortunately feminism is so toxic that it pollutes everything, creating a progressively worse nightmare totalitarian environment. The only way of combating this menace is to create an equally robust MRM.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:22 PM
17

I am utterly disgusted that these feminist harpies would rather play politics than acknowledge the now obvious fact that this man is innocent. These modern day lynch mob "activists" and mediawhores should be loudly condemned. Good on Cathy Young for having some integrity.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:16 PM
4

To Kill a Mockingbird...How soon we forget.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:07 PM
7

There's nothing unusual about the fine. What IS unusual is that Chris Paul is being accused of sexism for using the pronoun "her." What was he supposed to call "her" -- "it"?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter