TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LawfulLarrikin24-7 Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by LawfulLarrikin24-7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think this specific situation is one in which the legal system could have become involved, at least police have the discretion to deal with occurrences like this even if they aren't punishable, but I agree that there weren't too many options for dealing with this incident. I think that the way it turned out definitely wasn't ideal. In my view we're both coming to a similar conclusion even if from different perspectives. I'm being a bit specific to the incident and I can see from what you're sa…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:09 PM
2

Haha oath, the world couldn't really give a shit what I think, guess I'm just putting my opinion out there hoping someone can take away something from it. Yeah it's an unfortunate social behaviour, I'm finding it more common these days. I even do the same sometimes like it's automatic, but I try to pull myself up on instantly judging whenever I can. Gamergate is a pretty good example of it, I sat on the sidelines for that though cause it was a definite shit-flinging contest at least by the time …
/r/MensRights19/10/16 01:44 PM
1

The problem was that it wasn't just social commentary, there were very clear and specific threats being made. Punishment is not a matter for social commentary, which is proven by the fact that you yourself say it isn't a criminal court. Why are people on social media passing their judgements on someone. It's not up to me to prove that she's lying, it's up to her to provide a source for her facts. I simply expressed that Ford has no source for these claims yet has incentive to voice them. I'll ha…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:09 AM
1

Due process does exist judicially in Aus it's just found under the separation of powers and doesn't quite reflect the US version. I probably should have clarified. I think the best reason for involving the authorities would have been because it could generate some substantive proof of the event occurring. Trust is at an all time low these days, especially on the Internet and you can't simply take a persons word and act on it.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 02:59 AM
2

Yeah I completely agree with your point on the Daily Mail. They definitely had a hand in spurring on both sides of the argument without really digging for any facts just internet speculation. I don't deny that we can comment on an event like this and try and learn something. I just think people needlessly jumping to conclusions and making judgements when both sides of the argument are weak at best doesn't help due process. edit I find that to be the problem with the far right and left wing ideol…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:41 AM
2

I also find it a bit of a cop out that Clementine uses half her article to equate proven cases of assault to an incident that hasn't even had the involvement of the authorities.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:36 AM
2

Well considering her reputation is reliant on her being right I wouldn't put it past her to lie about her source. I read her article and she doesn't actually give any proof to confirm she spoke to anyone or knows anything about the guy. If he had been in the Magistrates court almost twenty times surely someone somewhere would know that and have the records to prove it. That info has seemingly appeared out of nowhere. Btw the argument isn't just about defending a person with autism, it's about po…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:28 AM
2

Please understand that I never used the term with the intent to be derogatory. I understand that autism is on a spectrum and that there are people with autism that have higher ability and lead relatively regular lives and others that unfortunately do not. I used the terminology in order to reflect the man in question who clearly by his character could be considered severely autistic and it being obviously a handicap regarding his ability to function.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:53 AM
1

Will do, I've already given her a more formal response to each of her points as I was working yesterday and didn't have the time. As soon as I get done with uni today I'll work on getting it all to reddit
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:41 AM
1

Well firstly I don't have an anti-woman agenda, some people involved might but I made the post purely because the situation was out of control and the man's life was and likely still is at risk. I won't lie I have definitely opposed some feminist opinions previously but I'm definitely not obsessed with it. I just felt something needed to be said in defence of the man as he likely doesn't have a platform on social media. I responded to her sixth point basically by saying that you can't equate nam…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:09 PM
2

She's way ahead of you in that respect. She has already written an article toying with the idea of male concentration camps. You can just tell by the way it's written she gets off on that shit.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:01 PM
2

I was "lucky" enough to have her respond as well as still remain unblocked by her account after my post. I guess that's conclusive evidence that I have white male privilege.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:58 PM
10

In all honesty all I wanted to do was call her out on her bullshit in the hopes that she would get it through to her (unfortunately) vast group of followers that she made a mistake. At least this would then reduce the threat against the poor man for crying out loud. I don't care what kind of injustice you've been dealt, vigilante justice after the fact is not the answer and sure as hell won't resolve the situation fairly. Mostly I'm concerned with the amount of people willing to act on one perso…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:52 PM
57

Yeah I'm LAP2410, I chose that article because often the Sydney Morning Herald post fords articles. I figured what better way to get her attention than to show up on home turf. I just find it really rich that she tries to call me out on my use of the term mentally handicapped while lambasting a disabled man for overstepping social boundaries he may not have been aware of and also encouraging vigilante justice against him. Yet I'm supposedly the one discriminating against people with disabilities…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter