TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lawfulness-Savings Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Lawfulness-Savings on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They are two different things, the outcome, however, is the same, on average the richer person will be fitter than a poorer person. Just like the guy who eats steak every day is probably bigger than the guy who eats potatoes. All of these things are a part of the package and that's how it's relevant, you cannot isolate the effects from the causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 01:24 AM
2

I'm not re-reading studies about exercise I did all that shit when I started getting my 6 pack, figure it out on your own lmao. There are dozens of studies that all say the same thing. If you're richer, you're more likely to exercise for a multitude of reasons male or female. But all of them have to a direct relationship to you being richer, sorry that's how it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:56 AM
1

Oh wow, didn't realize this one was just about cycling, something men rarely do ever. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2864796/ Here's the one for men and weightlifting, and there are dozens of studies on this, none of them support your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:48 AM
1

The funny part about that.... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552741/#:\~:text=People%20in%20the%20highest%20income,and%20participation%20in%20physical%20activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 11:32 PM
1

I agree with you but that further contradicts your original point: Man cant change from x-->y Here's man who didn't even change from x-->y but from y-->z extending the timeline he could change.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 09:37 PM
1

Well considering a used car sits right now on average at 26k for near decade-old car, and that's >50% of your yearly net income, I don't expect you'll be driving a Lexus. And yes infact that most people do calculate finances into their marriage decisions, whether you like it or not, or just go ahead and start working at Walmart and try to pick up women, go ahead and tell us all how that works out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 09:24 PM
1

You use anecdotal evidence to support your claims, I cannot refute the fact that you think blue is green. All I can do is express to you the tangible realities and outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 09:17 PM
0

Some people aren't bothered by this at all, some people eat nails for fun. I have no doubt everyone wants their brad Pitt, that's your problem of a choice. I'm just not driving a beater anymore and have no intention of wasting time on those who only tabulate their attraction to me by my physical attractiveness, I can't add any more inches or any more visible abs. But I sure as fuck can offer you a life you wouldn't have otherwise. Each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 09:07 PM
1

I absolutely agree with your whole list. Now onto the problem of the fact that your list exists: You see the obvious paradox in having two different requirements and saying that one inevitably leads to the other correct? Why should a 25 and a 35-year-old not both be allowed to start a new career? And the answer which we both know is because one is younger and the other is older, therefore by your very own logic HE MUST HAVE MATURED.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:59 PM
0

Poor people dont take once-in-a-decade trips to Cabo, its just above poverty which will have a net income around 30kish. You can still eat McDonald's on the weekdays don't worry, you're just not having regular excursions to DT SF for a 100 dollar meal, or going to Disneyland with your kids every summer, or really ever. Most people won't be bothered by this unless you make it clear to them, they could have that, it's called stoicism. The fact that you responded at all is proof of that, it doesn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:48 PM
3

Define a well put together 20 year old male, and then define a well put together 35 year old male.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:33 PM
3

What's your degree? so we can see if your answer is going to change in 2 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:30 PM
-1

Enjoy your 1999 toyota corolla and once in a decade trips to cabo, or a McMansion and a pool in the backyard with seasonal trips to wherever you want to go. Hypotheticals are always nice until your beater rolls next to an Escalade or a McLaren. That's reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:12 PM
7

Most men are a mess at 20. The bad ones are still a mess at 35. It's not that hard when you use logic. Please tell us how you made perfect decisions at 20 years old.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 08:06 PM
1

And about the 2 year difference, thats actually a huge number when you consider the implications. If the vast majority of men and women make around 50kish, then that means most of them are average and would not offer each other much and that's around 60% of the population so they will all marry their age, which means just the 40% of other people are likely skewed into 6+ years of difference at the higher end of the income spectrum. And if you look at financial powerhouse hiphop/sports/acting/ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:28 PM
1

You're confusing an ideal trait with an ideal person. No, it isn't because a man's peak is not defined by his individual traits nor is it by the way a woman rates him physically, a mans peak is determined by the number of options that he has that he considers desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:21 PM
3

Being a "gold digger" is just one aspect of your personality, Kayne may have had a catchy song but at the end of the day everyone wants their financial experience to be more pleasant than average. If you're going by the strict term of 'ideal' then yes the OP is correct, of course, if you take the realistic approach of what women will search for to best fit their criteria then it falls apart. We all want a rich sugar mommy who's 18 with perfect boobs and a perfect ass to be our wives, that's my i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:11 PM
2

Most women do not want to work high-stress high-pay jobs (neither do men, but that's the rub), there are very few high-pay low-stress jobs, and absolutely those women who do and make a comfortable living would choose a man who meets her other desires, because like we've just said she makes a comfortable (enough for her) living, so her financial desires are already being met.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:01 PM
2

Sure we add the addendum that 50k guy will only ever earn 50k, and 150k will only ever earn 150k. I guarantee with 100% certainty, the vast majority will take the older man presuming they themselves are not making good money (and are satisfied working until reritrment).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:39 PM
1

"Beta buxx" refers to a man a woman utilizes for his financial assets while not faithfully being in a relationship or in order to secure commitment for her offspring, or after she has hit "the wall" A 22 year old woman with a 35 year old man is likely not "beta buxx"ing him, she is simply "gold digging". Again they don't date these men, and that's where "beta buxx" comes in, because they are fucking these men while attempting to date someone who can provide. You don't seem to have any concept of…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:21 PM
4

Because the entire premise of the OPs argument is pillared on the fact that there is an abundance of high-earning 26 year olds, when in reality there aren't many 26 year olds making 300k straight out of college. So when accounting for averages you just look at peak earnings, which as you might've guessed is about 35. There is always some transaction between relationships whether you care to acknowledge it or not, I don't see many girls picking up bums or gas station clerks as potential relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:07 PM
3

No you negated it perfectly well, you made clear women want younger men who are financially set, the entire premise is flawed on the fact that MOST 26 year olds do not compare with MOST 35 year olds. So you want younger men who are financially set, now the question becomes, where are they? And the answer is they're a decade in the future when they re 35. TRP has never argued a 35 year old billionaire is more attractive to a woman than a 21 year old billionaire. TRP points out the clear fact that…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:01 PM
4

Ding Ding Ding, a woman wants a younger man because he fulfills her desires, but a man desires money so that he can have a young beautiful woman <- notice the only adjectives were young and beautiful? And that's why those relationships never work. Does a young woman want a young beautiful man or would she prefer an average older rich man? Ding Ding Ding. Obviously the ultimate fantasy is for her to have a young rich beautiful man, but as correctly been stated, like young rich beautiful women, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 04:56 PM
7

And thus you have negated your own argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 04:30 PM
16

Bad faith argument on the premise that a 26 year old will be equivalent to a 35 year old. Only in EXTREMELY rare cases is that true. Let's take an easily relatable example, why would say a 26 year old software engineer a few years out of college be making anywhere near the amount of money someone with the same mindset the same drive and ambition having taken the same route??? The answer is the wouldn't you're not and cannot compare the two. One will be making 100-120k the other will be making 16…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter