TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Le_Bete Archive

View 0 posts and 230 comments by Le_Bete on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

and yet you just used small dick size to ridicule men just one comment above…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:15 PM
2

don’t you feel embarrassed to be the type of person to say that men that you don’t like all have small dicks
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:14 PM
2

that top one is absolutely nuts man he looks like a child
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 10:47 PM
1

Post a pic of the physique you like then
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 07:45 AM
1

Post a pic of the physique you like
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 07:45 AM
0

“tihi but it just so happens…”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 07:44 AM
2

It’s not to late, but you’re gonna have to get going there’s no doubt about that. Look for men about 5 years older who want kids. Good luck, but don’t delay!
/r/RedPillWomen22/05/22 03:05 PM
8

This is terrible and not redpill advice Don’t feel bad about having sex. It’s natural There’s nothing natural about having a bunch of casual sex with men that don’t care about you almost all of us have had our “hoe faze” it’s not a bad thing Incorrect, and maliciously incorrect. A hoe faze is extremely damaging In your next relationship if he ask just make up a number, but most guys won’t bring it up And now you’re suggesting she lies to her next partner. All round terrible advice. You want to g…
/r/RedPillWomen22/05/22 01:42 PM
6

That is not redpill A person’s past absolutely has a bearing on their value as a mate. It’s not insecure for her boyfriend to not put up with that, quite the opposite it shows some self respect
/r/RedPillWomen22/05/22 01:36 PM
1

You’re not making sense… My whole point is that big tech shouldn’t be allowed to censor, so why should I leave? You’re the one who thinks people should take the route of obscurity. I could use that argument against you, it makes zero sense for you to use it on me
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:38 PM
-1

Hamstering
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:33 PM
1

Just because there were people making drag racers in california, didn’t mean that the government wouldn’t stop GM from acquiring Ford. Monopoly doesn’t mean there can’t be anything else, it means that nothing else has a chance at competing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:30 PM
1

No, but society is notably worse off when you give the status quo the right to silence dissent under the guise of TOS
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:19 PM
1

Islam has inspired more terrorism than all other ideologies in modern history, so you think we should ban islam?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:05 PM
0

Okay do you have any proof for this
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:04 PM
1

I mean there’s always open source. Shit, Android is based off Open source tech- so it’s not like the source code isn’t there for others to use. If it’s “such a problem” then it feels like someone will build the thing in high demand. So you support it And Google isn’t the only email service. You act like thunderbird hasn’t been around since forever. So you support it And you act like IP is a human right. Observe the terms and conditions So you support it Landlords do have lease agreements. They a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 02:03 PM
0

I don’t think you have any proof that men act less romantic than women. And you don’t have any proof that men cheat more beyond that men admit that they cheat more often, which is a big difference
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:59 PM
2

if that’s all that you feel that you bring to the table then I’m sure it rings true
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:48 PM
2

And when Apple decides that they don’t like what I’m writing to my friends in my messages app, will you stand up then? And when google doesn’t like me emailing a certain person anymore, will you stand up then? And when Verizon decides that my browsing habits are far too radical, will you stand up then? How about when my landlord decides that he doesn’t want my kind there, all he needs to do is write it into his terms of service. As does a grocery store. As does a hospital People used to stand fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:45 PM
-2

Sure but men have a more romantic view of the world
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:37 PM
1

So you don’t want private enterprises to be allowed to enforce the terms and conditions you agreed to when you created an account on their website? No, I do not Why do you hate business? I think you’re confusing not sucking Ayn Rand’s cock with hating business
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:32 PM
1

So you’re saying that marriage is a really bad deal for men then right? I mean 20% of women’s income is straight up just the man’s salary then
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:31 PM
1

That will never happen. RP ideas are dangerous to the establishment
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:17 PM
1

I literally couldn’t care less what the constitution says about social media censorship. I care about the outcomes of social media censorship
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:12 PM
3

And I will bet my house to a donut that my married-for-fifteen-years-ass gets more sex than he does That’s not what we’re talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:59 PM
1

Yeah we know
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:49 PM
1

Censorship? Who cares! Just go start your own silicon valley conglomerate!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:30 PM
1

Depends on what you mean. It goes deeper than that
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:28 PM
1

Because he already has so much invested into his career. No that’s not it… A man pre-and post divorce has the exact same time invested in his career, so why is it he’s more successful post divorce? Careers typically increase over time. And he has fewer expenses after the divorce. How does he have fewer expenses, all that unpaid labor that how wife did is according to you ilk worth 3-4 full time jobs They are comparing women's 20% decline to men's 30% increase. No, they are not after a divorce, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:25 PM
2

That’s what we’re doing in this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:17 PM
1

If there's some worth to a thing, it survives criticism. That's how science works. I agree, so why don’t you loudly come out in support of lively discussion and against censorship And what you're talking about is just over-moderating. Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:17 PM
2

Yeah which is my point, why are you pretending like you wouldn’t support censorship or banning people with different views from their texts, emails or whatever “what? they broke the terms of service!”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 12:15 PM
0

Of course it is, so why do mods delete it for [incel content]
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:53 AM
1

So I ask again: If we understand that we can’t let a conglomerate get a monopoly economically, why do we think nothing bad will happen when the status quo gets a monopoly on discourse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:48 AM
2

well 30% of young men are also not having sex at all, are you gonna argue that they don’t want to do that either?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:45 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:24 AM
1

Because I've seen people downplay their comments here once it gets deleted. How convenient! Get people’s comments deleted then gaslight them that it never happened
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:16 AM
1

Okay I see what your saying. When they talk about income during the marriage, I believe they mean household income, as that's what's usually reported in taxes. Compared to their combined income while married, she sees a decrease while he sees an increase because he no long has a wife and/or kids to support. Okay so why isn’t he losing major amounts of money if women provide such a massive amount of unpaid labor? Again: Not what’s being discussed! How would the man increase his economic situation…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:10 AM
1

I'm not comparing her to a hypothetical woman... I'm comparing her to her ex-husband. You weren’t… You said women were worse off, not worse off compared to their husbands. And the link you posted also doesn’t talk about how women fair compared to their husbands, it talks about how they compare in absolute numbers, i.e. compared to themselves pre-divorce I'm not sure how I can make it any clearer at this point. He starts off in a better position than she does. If you can think about it as a race,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 10:47 AM
1

I’ve already explained to you that this doesn’t have anything to do with what we’re talking about. No one is comparing divorced women to some hypothetical woman “they could have been”, we’re comparing divorced women with themselves before they got divorced. So again, explain how that would work, how would men excel after divorce and women do worse after divorce if you hold the opinion that women do massive amounts of work for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 10:35 AM
1

Yeah, now why would that be if women spend hours on hours on unpaid labor in the home as you people claim? There’d be so much more time to work! The man on the other hand lost his “bang maid” GASP! Now he has to do all that massive amount of house work! So how come he actually improves in his career? Both can’t be true, pick one
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 10:14 AM
1

The comments get deleted so how would that work did you imagine? Go up and down this thread, all of us have had the same experience
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:49 AM
1

Lol look around in this thread, several of us have been deleted and hit with bans for discussing look/heightism, dating double standards, anti-feminism, or just RP theory in general
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:42 AM
1

Half of all marriages ending in divorce and the majority of young men being single isn’t evidence that shit is fucked up? Okay, what’s the point of talking to you if you don’t live in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:37 AM
0

Yeah because you subscribe to the same worldview as them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:34 AM
1

[Trolling] or [Incel Content] just means anything that a mod doesn’t like (anti-feminism, RP stuff)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:33 AM
1

No but it’s pretty good evidence that shit is fucked up
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:32 AM
1

Big tech is sitting on easily 99% of social media, and they all have the same TOS. That’s a monopoly
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:28 AM
1

Who’s saying they don’t want to defend their position? The core of the problem is that RP and anti-feminism posters WON’T be allowed to defend their positions
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:26 AM
1

51% of young men are single
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:21 AM
1

TOS are deliberately nebulous so they can be applied only to the people that disagree with the status quo If 99% of social media has the same TOS and the same discrepancy in enforcement then that is a censorship issue
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:19 AM
1

And why is the exact same talk but about men allowed on TwoXChromosomes and the likes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:17 AM
1

Lol so being anti-feminism means it’s dangerous and needs to be censored?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:16 AM
1

And yet women/blue pillers vent and rant here with full mod support, why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:14 AM
1

As if you don’t support censorship in group text chats “what, they’re a private company!”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:13 AM
3

Censorship? Who cares! Just go babble in a coffee shop!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:10 AM
2

I’ve been deleted and banned for speaking about hypergamy, lookism, OLD. Anything we say that mods don’t like they’ll remove for incel content or trolling. They never do that for FDS/Blue Pill people
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:09 AM
1

…this exactly OP’s point
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:03 AM
0

Hey guess what the same rules apply to blue pillers and women too LMAO don’t make me laugh! 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:02 AM
1

There are plenty of other platforms to get your hate on, like Twitter, Discord, YouTube, Facebook These platforms all have the same TOS and ban the exact same thought. They’re also together with Reddit like what, 95% of all social media? If we understand that we can’t let a conglomerate get a monopoly economically, why do we think nothing bad will happen when the status quo gets a monopoly on discourse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 09:02 AM
2

Huh strange, nothing happened… Maybe it’s because banning people based on nebulous concepts such as vitriol, hate or “incel content” just means that mods get to decide to ban whoever doesn’t agree with the status quo, while allowing their fellow travelers to be just as hateful as they’d like
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:57 AM
3

51% of young men are not in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:53 AM
1

The majority of marriages end in divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:51 AM
2

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:50 AM
1

if I diagnose you as a cuck, will that stop me from being banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:46 AM
3

doubt it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:43 AM
1

we have to censor so people don’t get their feelings hurt 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:30 AM
6

I consider your comment vitriolic, I’m reporting you I hope you get banned
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:15 AM
7

I’ve had comments deleted because I’ve claimed that dating is harder for unattractive men. Apparently unless you agree that women are non-shallow goddesses you’re posting incel content
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:13 AM
9

Yup. You can just point out that looks is the most important thing when finding a partner and that counts as incel content
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 08:11 AM
-1

you’re wrong but ok
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 07:46 AM
2

They’re not subpar partners, women are rejecting men on their own level, even above their level because of hypergamy induced standards
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 06:21 AM
1

Why would I need to do that? The whole point is that if women were honest with themselves about attractiveness they would be in more stable, fulfilling relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 05:47 AM
1

Wrong! You stated women will be worse off after divorce, not worse off compared to men
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 05:40 AM
0

In grade school they also teach kids not to lie, I guess you missed that session
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 05:38 AM
1

You’re strawmanning I never said they give a shit about your love life, I just pointed out that you have to be really stupid to believe that it would be a winning tactic to make your service worse WHEN THERE ARE OTHER SERVICES like literally just think about it for 2 seconds, it makes zero sense
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:52 PM
2

Yeah, you obviously just made it up 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:45 PM
1

Why would I need to show you that? It doesn’t make your claim any more true So you just made it up, cool that’s what I thought 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:42 PM
1

This is absolutely asinine There is no dating app that purposely tries to keep people from finding a partner to “keep them on the app” The biggest amount of customers aren’t on the app, they’re outside of the app. If apps had a better way to match people up they would do it. If there was an app that was leagues better than others then everyone would migrate to that, including people who don’t currently use the apps. They’d be the market leader and they could charge whatever they wanted for it Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:39 PM
3

Uhm, no I didn’t… You claimed men cheat more first and I responded to you So you don’t have any proof beyond just self admittance? Then my point stands
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:27 PM
3

send the link
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:24 PM
1

You did... Except I didn’t… Yes... Because all the free time in the world now isn't as valuable now as it was when she was younger. Her resume will not be as impressive as her 30yo equivalent who never married. She can improve her career, sure... But she can never catch up Who stated she will catch up? What we’re talking about is whether her career will improve or not post divorce. You claim it won’t, but seem to also think that women do massive amounts of unpaid labor in the home. Well which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:22 PM
1

Who’s saying that…? You’re saying putting in effort after she’s divorced won’t improve her career compared to when she was married. How does that make sense if she’s got all this free time now that she doesn’t have to care for her loser husband
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:06 PM
1

what research does this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:04 PM
0

Honestly it’s probably largely bc men are more romantic. They want it to work more than women do Women are much more transactional. They’ll consider hardship a breach of contract
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:56 PM
4

“Communication is key!” “He should just know!”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:40 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:39 PM
1

Attractiveness is objective. Imagine you could get all women in a dating pool to rank all the men of a dating pool, their percentile of rank would be their league, so their match would be a woman of the same percentile If women had a better grip on what their actual level was they would be more forgiving of their partners. It’s scientifically proven that less attractive people care less about attractiveness in a mate, but of course they’d have to be aware that they’re less attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:38 PM
2

that doesn’t have anything to do with what I said, and it doesn’t answer how they’d be worse off after the divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:32 PM
1

men are more likely to admit that they cheat, big difference
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:30 PM
6

I thought women had to do all that “unpaid house work” and “emotional labor”, shouldn’t they have way more time to dedicate to their career once they’re single 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:16 PM
6

It’s a joke…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:05 PM
4

Looks and other things
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 06:51 PM
5

Madonna and Whore complex isn’t real every normal man wants a madonna that’s a whore just for him
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 05:57 PM
2

Only in the sense that women aren’t happy with a partner on their own level. It’s still harder for men to find a partner in their own league
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 05:46 PM
5

But they won’t ask you for it Not an argument Let’s be clear, I don’t blame guys for being thirsty horndogs, I blame them for thinking I should do something about it Nobody said this. We’re talking about how it’s much more difficult to date as a male
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 05:18 PM
9

The issue is that what you think is average is actually well above average, which is part of OP’s point “How can dating be so hard when completely average men are doing it” points to +80th percentile men
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 04:56 PM
26

That’s some bad logic… I’m sympathetic to a person with a bad kidney, even if I have no intention of giving them mine
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 04:49 PM
1

men that aren’t part of the two categories i mentioned above
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 03:12 PM
1

The source is right there… you’re floundering
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:07 PM
1

More Gyms than ever More gym goers and serious gym goer than ever Where is your proof that me and OP are wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:03 PM
1

OP said modern society has an obsession with weightlifting, you said it doesn’t, what’s your proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 11:45 AM
1

What study did you cite?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 11:30 AM
1

ok, what percentage of normal men do you think wear makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 09:28 AM
1

What percentage of men do you think wears it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 09:27 AM
1

Muscles have alway been attractive but there has never been more gyms per capita than now, and there has never been more men who go consistently 3+ days a week to lift weights
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 05:15 AM
19

Each new partner is different so don’t stress it too much that you’ll be “bad” with the next girl: everyone is. But by the time you’ve had sex with any specific girl about 5 times you should have a decent idea what she likes and what you enjoy doing with her too
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 03:42 PM
10

majority?? lmao, try 99.99%
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 02:36 PM
12

Men who aren’t in entertainment or gay do not wear makeup. I’d say less than 1/10,000 do
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:49 PM
1

Disgusting
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:59 AM
2

If you add up the percentages in the polygraph test it means you gotta multiply women’s body counts by 1.9
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 08:45 PM
2

https://www.her.ie/amp/life/heres-number-people-average-millennial-sex-440797 This says 12 for millennials, 11 for millennial women, but again unless they’re hooked up to a polygraph, multiply the number by about 1.9 times Not a lifetime, millennials are what, mid 20’s to late 30’s? If the average is 11 (again, not polygraphed) that means that a very significant number of women are at MORE than average You don’t rack up a body count like that if you need a deep connection I think that anyone wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 08:43 PM
1

ah, gotcha. well there’s no self help books to sell by just telling people that they should have been born more handsome
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 07:59 PM
2

I don’t think I’ve ever read a RP source that claims that money/game can overcome looks and physicality
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 07:42 PM
0

why, because you say so??
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 07:00 PM
3

It’s sooo fucking funny to me that every woman in this thread is like “I don’t care about looks at all, I need a really deep connection” and yet in every city there’s thousands of young women who are gonna get taken for a one night stand tonight, in every city there’s Chads with +300 body counts for no reason other than they’re handsome The average body count for women is 12 for Christ’s sake, and knowing that women lowball unless hooked up to a polygraph it’s likely 20+! Can you people stop lyi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:57 PM
2

at least you’re honest 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:52 PM
10

well written response, thank you for the effort
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:35 PM
0

How many of that 68% is a relationship that’s over a year? Dating and sleeping with 6 guys monogamously over a year is certainly still casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:07 PM
7

Women will also define sleeping with a guy who’s taken them on 2 dates as “not casual sex”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:04 PM
3

You really don’t. I know I never wanna be pegged, I need zero try outs
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:02 PM
0

what’s the number for women under 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:00 PM
2

I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me how those two things are equivalent. Both are people trying to date above their league and then complaining when the thing that we all knew was gonna happen, happens
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:51 PM
9

Was she aware it was a one night stand, or did he lie and pretended that they were going to be in a relationship? 99% of the time Chads will not promise anything, women will just kind of invent this grand love story between them. It’s the classic thing of “we’re so compatible!”… uhm no sweetie, everyone thinks they’re compatible with Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:44 PM
3

hell yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:36 PM
2

metabolism is a meme you’re not eating as much as you think son
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:35 PM
10

Brad Pitt with pictures taken on a flip phone would do better than Mr. Bean photographed by Anne Liebowitz on a Hasselblad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:50 PM
2

you know you’d strike out just as much as we know it too
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:24 PM
11

your logic here is so flawed that it’s almost funny
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 01:22 PM
6

You don’t have to be good looking to succeed in online dating This is not true. The bio accounts for at most 10% whereas the pictures are at least 90%
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 12:51 PM
1

exes I never said former boyfriends
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:59 AM
1

I think it’s more the baseline crazy that’s much higher. Every woman is at least medium level crazy, the actual psychos are probably about as common as the male ones
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:57 AM
3

“men should open up about their feelings” “no not like that…”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:55 AM
0

Lmao this comment is the most pseudoscientific things I’ve ever seen in this sub, and that’s saying a lot Being more emotional obviously means you’re easier to manipulate. Just look at modern politics, all you need to do is show a picture of a dead kid and you get 90% of women to rush to open the borders “Easier to control”. HAH!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 06:52 AM
1

very nebulous definition…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:35 AM
1

i’m keking bro, that’s your evidence??
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:32 PM
1

wow I had no idea that 1975 was 100 years ago
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:59 PM
0

The millennials I know have all definitely dated more than one person and most are not yet married Who said one person? You do know the average age of first marriage is near the 30 year mark, and the higher your income the more it increases Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 02:42 PM
0

I know
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 01:50 PM
2

👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 12:30 PM
2

Not serious ones no, and virtually no millennial has. Most people have 3-4 serious relationships before they marry. Even just 10 is extremely uncommon
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 12:17 PM
1

I’m sorry about that, I hope you feel better now
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 12:13 PM
1

Women don’t “cluster” around the “top” men any more than men “cluster” around women who look like IG models Men would if they could, but they can’t. A 99th percentile man will sleep with a 70th percentile woman. A 99th percentile woman will not entertain a 70th percentile man whatsoever Women are not more superficial than men No, equally superficial Almost no women are looking for cheap sex. If that’s what you want from them, you’d better look amazing. Did you just not read what I wrote? Women h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:39 AM
1

Yeah but you didn’t k*ll yourself tho did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:36 AM
2

The average sexual partner count is 11-12 for millennials. That’s casual sex. Most millennials are absolutely having casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:30 AM
1

That’s not what I’m advocating. I’m advocating shaming women who have premarital sex with men who are out of their league and won’t marry them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:27 AM
1

Conventionally attractive men go for conventionally attractive women. That’s a fact. For long term monogamous relationships yes. But not for short term dating and casual sex. And as long as a significant percentage of women engage in that behavior, enough of them are taken “off” the market that men at their true level have to date women below them. So all women get to date upwards because a few women cluster around top percentile men Women have more “opportunities” for cheap sex with strange men…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:26 AM
0

Who said always? Every single woman doesn’t necessarily date up, but all women can because of the vacuum left by women clustering around top males, and most do
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 11:06 AM
1

Hypergamy in this case doesn’t mean dating upwards in terms of money, it means dating upwards in terms of attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 10:25 AM
4

How do we fix this? As much monogamy as possible, as much waiting til marriage as possible. The issues we see today are largely because of women fucking upwards, and then marrying down from that level, which feels like settling If a large percentage of women practice hypergamy then ALL women practice hypergamy even if they actively don’t realize it. If say 20% of women flock around the top percentile of men then all women get to move up one rung for each of the women riding the carousel. So all …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 09:22 AM
1

but they weren't rejecting them because they were too attractive, they were rejecting them because they weren't offering commitment. Potatoe, potato. Either way more attractive we’re rejected more often than now, and people didn’t rack up as high body counts all men can't be suffering from hypergamy. in your example the top ones are doing much better out of it That’s fair I guess, but it’s a very small percentage of men overall I agree with you that the culture of casual sex has a negative affec…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 08:57 AM
3

Delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 08:54 AM
7

I believe the issues stem from casual sex. These issues do not exist in cultures that do not practice it
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 08:05 AM
1

If people didn’t have casual sex then that means that they had sex within marriage. Marriage pairings happen within ones league of attractiveness the vast majority of the time, so I would say you’re wrong. People did reject more attractive people all the time because there was no offer of commitment behind it either way I can't see our culture deciding to backslide just because mediocre men are sad It’s not backsliding, it’s a much more evolved culture to say “we’re going to restrict our immedia…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:59 AM
6

This is so true! Dating is easy and fun for about 5% of men, manageble for another 15%, a really bad slog where you don’t get anywhere near what you put in for the next 50%, and then a desert or straight up hell for the last 30% Most people focus on the top two tiers and say “hey, that doesn’t seem so bad!”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:56 AM
1

The suicide rate among divorced adults is more than three times that of married adults, while the suicide rate among singles is 1.5 to 2 times the rate among those who are married. In other words, marriage is a protective factor for suicide risk
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:51 AM
2

I don’t think that’s gonna do much to solve the issues unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:40 AM
5

A culture of casual sex doesn’t solve the problems you describe. You can’t seriously believe that people cheated more 100 years ago than now
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:33 AM
0

That’s not what people are doing Fucking 10+ people isn’t testing out sexual compatibility, it’s ho*ing around
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:30 AM
3

This would be good, and probably the healthiest way to engage with strangers, but I doubt it would gain much traction. There are already singles socials organized by various matchmaking services or apps. There’s like 10 men for every woman, so it doesn’t really help, it just exacerbates hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:27 AM
1

We used to be able to, up until about 50 years ago. There’s plenty of cultures that do
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:14 AM
1

Yes. What do you mean how. Through shaming. People don’t want to live in shame so they abstain from shameful behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:43 AM
1

No, hypergamy here refers to how a large percentage of women flock to the highest percentile men, which creates a vacuum that enables all other women to date upwards. That’s hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:40 AM
1

That’s what society looked like, oh gee I don’t know, since the creation of civilization up until about 50 years ago
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:36 PM
1

Do you want to be judged on how much money you have? What does that have to do with anything? Why are there poor people having sex and getting married if women only have sex with men who have more money than them? Who said this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:32 PM
1

I’m not saying me personally, I’m saying us as a society
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:29 PM
1

No, but it’s not the majority of men who are driving hypergamous tendencies in society so it matters a lot less
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:28 PM
1

Shame is the punishment. And of course the shame comes with an understanding that it lowers your standing with society and the other gender
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:24 PM
0

They’re not informed choices I’m not looking to fuck anyone but my girlfriend, I’m good thank you. Sorry but I’m not interested
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:23 PM
2

Again, what the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:22 PM
1

And most of them will divorce. Dating up all your twenties has consequences, mainly that returning to your real league feels like settling, plus your brand new body count brings your attractiveness for relationships down
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:21 PM
0

He means that he doesn’t need to go out of his way to be nice and make the men feel comfy for them to be able to be productive at work. For the women he does
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:16 PM
0

Just curious: when it's a woman who does the same to you because she is more intelligent, of course she is being sexist to you too This isn’t sound logic. The gender difference between the explainer and the employee doesn’t matter, what matters is if the explainer treats male and female employees differently
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:08 PM
0

Reality checking them. These women don’t really understand what they’re doing or what life they’re setting themselves up for Returning to a shaming culture. If these women got instant “punishment” rather than a delayed one it would stop it from happening. Not surprisingly people with low impulse control don’t understand delayed gratification
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:01 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:55 PM
0

The thing that gets pushback is people (men, here) using their own rating system to say what other people should think of them and evaluate them as. It doesn’t work like that. See but it does tho. 90th percentile men are gonna end up paired with 90th percentile women, give or take Saying that we should just stand by and watch 50th percentile women throw their youth away chasing 90th percentile men because it’s “their life and they are just attracted to who they’re attracted to” is weak and the t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:29 PM
0

That leaves like 10% of women…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 09:21 PM
2

It doesn’t have anything to do with cucking, these women are more or less single
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:59 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:55 PM
2

People who want to just fuck are going to go with the most physically attractive, most sexually appealing/satisfying option, most seemingly safe, etc. If the risk of death, stds, pregnancy, and assult is the same, women are going to choose their top tier fuck choices. Women “who just want to fuck” are vanishingly rare. There are a few in every college and scene and they rack up body counts in the hundreds. But among normal women sex is almost always done with men that they hope for more than jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:01 PM
2

I never said monogamous, I said busy These women are kept busy by Chads, that’s why so many men are single
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:39 PM
5

You didn’t really think this through… One Chad will keep 10, 20, 30 women busy a year easily. A good stable of 1,000 Chads can keep 25,000 women riding the carousel with zero commitment, easy
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:28 PM
3

Jesus Christ paying for dinner isn't a sign of mutual attraction Yes it is. If a woman is not attracted to the man she should not let him pay for the both of them
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:13 PM
10

Men who don't wait for signs of mutual interest are only after what they want without any concerns whatsoever about what she might want If men waited for signs of mutual interest there would be about 600 marriages in the entire world
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:09 PM
8

Your logic is faulty. Only 44% of millennials are married, and only half of those married before 28
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:04 PM
1

So you're opposed to sex education? I don’t really care about sex education but it’s not effective in stopping abortions Are you aware of the fact that the majority of women who get abortions are in fact Christians Except you‘ve been lied to again. The abortion rate for christian women is significantly lower than for atheists Please explain for me then why countries in northern Europe have some of the lowest abortion rates in the world Again, this isn’t true in the slightest, you just eat up wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:04 AM
3

I apparently don't watch as much cuckold porn as you do No you just make entire threads about it… Very normal
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:58 AM
1

The point is that obviously sex education/liberal government doesn’t slow abortion rates
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 09:43 PM
8

I don’t think you have any evidence that it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:46 PM
7

Idk I guess it’s a power fantasy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:46 PM
2

They’re not. You’ve been told that by people who lie for a living. DC, New York, New Jersey and Maryland are top 4. All super liberal states
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:45 PM
11

I don’t know what sites you hang at, but the majority of cuckold porn is starring the same white male actors as everything else
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:36 PM
15

LMAO, people who watch cuckold porn watch it imagining they’re the guy that’s fucking, not the husband! What’s next, searching for big tits means you wish you were a girl?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:00 PM
2

Yeah, show any stat that agrees with you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:10 PM
2

How about you show proof that christian states fuck less
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 05:10 PM
0

If nobody is doing it then you’d support legislation against it right?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:59 PM
2

It obviously doesn’t reduce shit
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:59 PM
0

If everybody acted like christians there would be zero children waiting for adoption. Tell non-christians to step up
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:41 PM
2

I thought the sex education was gonna reduce abortions, but obviously that’s a lie
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:36 PM
2

the states with the most abortions are the most atheist and liberal ones
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:27 PM
-1

but just killing them is a wonderful solution i guess…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 04:23 PM
0

You said you believe a person is a person when they have cognitive functions. It’s currently fully legal to kill babies with cognitive functions, and yet to you that doesn’t matter Are you following your moral code then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:16 PM
1

Not entirely sure how you arrived at that conclusion. I didn’t think you did, I’m pointing out that your argument holds no weight because you don’t actually care that women do have abortions for minor reasons I would wager that no women feel that way - even if they loathe children and can’t wait to get it over with Spend a little time on Twitter, or he’ll just a pro-abortion sub on reddit. The amount of women who gleefully get abortions are sickening. But again, you’re using this as a fake argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:14 PM
-2

and another 18 states allow abortion all the way up to viability Oh you were a week away from being a bouncing baby boy? Too bad - mommy gets to kill you So why limit an abortion to the first 6 weeks? Oh I don’t believe in that, I’m pointing out that you’re not following your own “morals”
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 03:07 PM
1

I want to know what gave you the idea that abortion is just a blasé, frivolous afternoon activity to all women Okay so you support banning abortion for women who are blasé and frivolous about it then? Because you people always do this, you act as if some wish and a prayer honor system that abortion pretty please won’t be abused is enough. It’s not. It’s obviously not
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:57 PM
-1

But current abortion laws do NOT ban abortions on babies that already have cognitive abilities They are hurting someone else, so it’s not something we get to turn a blind eye to
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:40 PM
2

I could explain it but it would take me a really really long time. Basically it boils down to stronger marriages and family units being the backbone of a healthy and successful society
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:35 PM
1

That’s absurd logic Stopping people from killing is the means. That is obviously morally the right thing to do. You seem focused on the ends since you think upholding this law of God and man to not kill is somehow not justified
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:29 PM
-1

Someone getting murdered isn’t my problem but I still want to make sure it’s illegal
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:25 PM
1

I do not understand what that has to do with this?? It’s more like you’d rather let 600,000 kids starve just to make sure that a few hundred mothers don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 02:00 PM
1

I don’t understand this moral logic at all You’re willing to sacrifice 600,000 kids because it might or might not save what, less than 0.1% of mothers who go through abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:53 PM
4

Amen brother
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:47 PM
-5

It’s more than twice as much as everyone else. Christians are not the issue, the rest are
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:45 PM
1

I’ve met some/known some. But none of my close female friends or family have had an abortion that I know of. Why do you care?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:44 PM
1

??? What could possibly be more utilitarian than saying that 600,000 children is a sacrifice we have to make to make sure that no women die in the process of illegally killing their baby mind you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:39 PM
-4

Christians are more than twice as likely to have adopted a child. 5% of Christian households have at least one adopted child Maybe some other demographic needs to step up for once
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:18 PM
1

Do you know a single woman who just casually strolls in and out of abortion clinics to solve her inconveniences in life? Yes, there’s a lot of them that do. Most of abortions happen like that in fact
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 01:10 PM
0

It’s not the babies fault the mother couldn’t support it, after all. All life deserves to truly live, no? Yes. And they’re alive The majority of those 400,000 children will not go home to parents. They will be bounced around from home to home Wrong. The majority return to family Again - conveniently, not your problem I can take all the responsibilities or zero responsibilities and it still doesn’t change the fact that every person deserves life, and you want to take that away from them for conve…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:45 PM
1

We can try to be better in some areas Yeah, like not killing our young
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:25 PM
0

Once I’m married I’d adopt a baby if my wife wants it too. Does that ruin your little bubble 😢 There are no newborns in permanent foster care. They get snatched up instantly. You people don’t really know what foster care is… It’s not some holding pen for kids that are gonna be adopted away, the majority of kids are meant to return to their parents or care givers custody
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 12:13 PM
1

lol thanks admitting that abortionist women are no better than animals
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:57 AM
1

It’s not what you asked because you want to pigeonhole people rather than receive real actionable answers If there’s 2 million couples hoping to adopt (possibly more than one child) then there’s no need for men to “step up” until that giant reserve has been depleted, which wouldn’t happen for a looong time
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:56 AM
2

Doubt it. More likely women will save sex for committed relationships, which is great for society
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:53 AM
8

that’s gonna make a lot of texans happy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:52 AM
0

Unwanted children (as opposed to accidental children!) do not magically become wanted or loved when birthed Actually +99% of the time they do. Only a terrible person wouldn’t love a child that they made
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:36 AM
1

so you think it’s better to let half a million kids die every year than risk whatever you described happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:33 AM
-1

So saving someone’s life and allowing them to live is “rotting” but killing them and throwing them to literally rot in a dumpster is not?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:29 AM
0

there’s 2 million couples in America on adoption waiting lists, plus most of the kids would just stay with their biological family
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:24 AM
-3

Lol so just kill them instead? Great argument 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:23 AM
3

It sounds like you’re making up a problem for yourself
/r/RedPillWomen29/04/22 02:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter