TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Le_ed Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by Le_ed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Natural benefits? Yes, a lot. Societal benefits? Not that many.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 05:43 PM
8

She is specifically talking about ICE agents. I suppose female ICE agents would get the same "treatment".
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:09 PM
18

Huh, no?
/r/MensRights27/12/25 09:58 PM
16

If the gender was flipped everyone would be flipping out saying "why are you looking at her crotch"
/r/MensRights12/04/25 10:16 PM
1

Why would it be a human life?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 12:41 PM
-2

Non human?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 03:17 AM
-3

But is it a human life?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:34 AM
3

Pro choice, and pro paper abortion for men.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:32 AM
-4

And why do you define a fetus as a human life?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 02:31 AM
3

Shout-out to black women for being the most egalitarian in this scenario.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:04 AM
3

Its simple, just make an opt-out system.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:22 PM
-2

Again, arguing semantics. And as I said, people think of exact sciences, not all sciences. Here in Brazil for instance, science is split into exact sciences, humane sciences, and biological sciences. STEM is basically a synonym of the exact sciences.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 06:37 AM
1

There is no such thing as a correct meaning of a word. A word's meaning is what people understand when you say it, and that can change with time and culture. But currently, when I say STEM people don't think medicine is in it.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 06:33 AM
-13

Although I'm generally in favor of Men's Rights, your's is just a bad argument, because you are arguing semantics. When people think of STEM they 100% think of the exact sciences, like maths, physics, engineering, computing, etc. And those are exactly the ones where men dominate. While it's definitely true that women dominate in other areas, most notably medicine and adjacent fields, those are not considered STEM for most people. Your argument only works by using a specific, non usual, definitio…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 05:41 PM
1

Regarding STEM Google Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men as It Addresses Wage Equity
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:14 PM
3

The problem is in the phrasing. It says "always morally wrong". Saying that something is "always X" is a pretty tough position to take.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:51 AM
-8

Condoms are not effective. They have a 13% failure rate over a year.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 06:53 PM
5

Film everything you can. As a man when this gets to court you will need all the evidence on your side.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 05:25 PM
3

Black people are not physically stronger and more "bearable". That's a racist stereotype that associates black people with manual labor.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 06:09 PM
2

Personally I would say that since the burden of proof is on the accuser, a conviction means that it has been proved to a reasonable degree that the rape has happened. Of course the system is not perfect, but in theory a conviction means that the rape did happen. An acquittal on the other hand doesn't mean that the allegation is false, only that it could not be sufficiently proven. It could be real, it could be false, we just don't know.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 02:31 AM
4

I am all for men's rights, and regarding abortion I support the idea of paper abortion as an option for men. However in this instance, the decision has to be entirely up to her. It would be completely immoral to force someone to have an abortion or to go through chemotherapy. I get that it is a terrible situation for him, but still it should be 100% her decision.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 01:32 AM
5

Exactly. I am a liberal and generally dislike libertarian ideology, and it always bothers me that other liberals will go straight to the "A business can do whatever they want with their private property" defense when things don't go their way. That's not to say that some conservatives won't do the same, just in reverse. I at least try to keep myself consistent, and I think that there should be laws against the kind of discrimination presented on this post, and similar demographic-based discrimin…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:22 PM
20

Yup, that settles it. That's not irrelevant at all, you are clearly obsessing over this, and you are clearly the only one bothered with this supposed smell (even the girls you talked about didn't mind it). I'd also say there is a chance this "smell" is entirely psychological (psychosomatic), since you seen to be the only one able to smell it.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:53 AM
31

By reading your comments it looks like you either have OCD or some health issue. An uncircumcised dick won't start smelling as quickly as you said.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:46 AM
1

Your beliefs do not dictate laws What a shit argument lol. No, the law dictates the law, and it says that a parent has to care for their child's well being, within their means. End of story. And miscarriages are unintentional you dumb fuck. "Intentional miscarriages" are called abortions, which is exactly the issue here. And abortions are federally legal exactly because fetuses are only considered human after viability. And killing yourself for your child clearly falls outside the "within their …
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:55 AM
1

A mother isnt required to breastfeed for one. Formula is an option despite 'breast is best'. And once its born its a viable human than yes it is murder but prior to that no But there are no alternatives like Formula for an uterus. If the only option was the mother's breast, than she would be obligated to breastfeed, regardless of her bodily autonomy. And you said that it is a viable human after it is born, but that is exactly the point that pro-lifers argue. That it is already a human at concept…
/r/MensRights13/04/22 08:01 PM
-2

It is not an individual of any species, it is a zygote for the species homo sapiens. And let me ask you a question, is a seed a tree? If I eat a bunch of grain am I causing an ecological disaster? Do I need a license to cut an acorn, the same way I would need for a tree? Try going around saying that a seed is a tree and see how many people would agree. A zygote becomes a human when it has developed enough complexity to be a human. The same way that a seed becomes a tree after it has developed en…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:18 PM
3

Damm, have you read my comment? At no point I said that cells are not alive, I said that they are not HUMAN life. Think about it for a second. Any single cell is alive, even bacterial cells, but no single cell IS A HUMAN LIFE. Can you get the idea? That a human is not any individual cell, but rather the specific arrangement of various cells? Again going back to my analogy, a house is a specific arrangement of bricks, not any individual brick. And no individual brick by itself can be considered a…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 09:00 PM
-2

Do you to think that talking in a condescending way makes you right? Not only are your arguments wrong, your method of delivering them shows blatant lack of intelectual maturity. Your argument is wrong because of the fundamental assumption that there needs to be a single point where you weren't human before it, and after it you were. It is a fundamental misunderstanding. Going from a zygote to a human is a continuous process, and your trying to interpret it as being a discrete one is just forcin…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:42 PM
2

Any individual cell may be alive, but is not a human life. A group of cells only become a human after a certain degree of complexity. A small cluster of human cells doesn't make a human, even if a large cluster of cells with the same DNA would make a human. Think of it like this, if I break a brick, does it mean I have broken a whole house? If I get a slight paper cut, does it mean I have killed millions of humans? Obviously no. Being human arrives from the specific and highly complex organizati…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 07:48 PM
2

But the majority disliked it...
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:56 PM
1

So is every cell on your body. If those are the definitions of human to you, then a paper cut is genocide.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:55 PM
-2

More criminals and more welfare? What the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:53 PM
8

In this scenario the woman should be allowed to have an abortion, in my opinion. I think it is immoral for someone to either force or prohibit an abortion for another person. So if the guy wants an abortion but the woman doesn't, than he has his paper abortion and the woman raises the child as a single parent. If it is the other way around, then the woman's body autonomy overules the man's desire to be a father, and she should be allowed to have the abortion.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:46 PM
-1

How is a single cell a human? Or a small cluster of undifferentiated cells a human? Having human DNA doesn't make it a human, or, as OP said, your skin cells could be considered human. If you amputate a finger, does if mean you are killing millions of humans? After all, there were millions of living cells with human DNA in your finger. If you transplant stem cells (which are also undifferentiated), does that mean you are taking humans from inside another human and putting them inside a third hum…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:38 PM
7

Although I am pro-choice, I think the argument of bodly autonomy is irrelevant when it comes to abortion exactly because of what OP said. The point is not that you can't do whatever you want with your body, the point is that, if you believe the fetus to be a human, it's not just your body anymore, so bodly autonomy doesn't apply here. In this scenario, abortion would be equivalent to killing your child, which you just can't do as a parent. If a mother decided she didn't want to breastfeed her ba…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 06:26 PM
14

That idea is called paper abortion. I support it, but unfortunately I don't think it is practiced in any country.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 08:15 PM
14

I agree with most of that, except for the abortion part. The person who will be subjected to the abortion procedure will be a woman, so it makes sense that she has priority in the decision for an abortion. If both parents are in agreement then great. If the man doesn't want an abortion but that woman wants one, an argument can be made that the woman doesn't have the right to remove the man's child without his consent (although I don't know if I agree with this argument). However if the woman doe…
/r/MensRights26/09/20 07:08 PM
47

I sort of disagree with that. I don't think the blame falls entirely on the people who wrote such laws, who indeed are mostly men. Those laws are supported and originate from society and culture with sexist beliefs towards men, and both man and woman uphold such beliefs.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 07:02 PM
-13

While sexism is definitely a factor, I think the main thing is that the guy isn't part of the family, and she is.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 09:38 PM
9

I don't know. By the looks of the people's shirts, it seems that he is a political candidate to something, and his name is Navarro.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:28 PM
74

No he is not. Source: Am Brazilian.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter