TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Leagueofbabies Archive

View 19 posts and 334 comments by Leagueofbabies on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
471

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights03/12/21 03:41 PM
385

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:42 AM
106

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:11 PM
101

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights29/09/21 02:40 AM
98

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:17 PM
79

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights27/12/19 12:15 AM
78

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:36 PM
66

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:23 AM
63

FeminismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights21/03/21 04:07 AM
50

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:38 AM
37

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:41 PM
35

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:51 PM
13

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights05/02/21 03:40 PM
11

IntactivismLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:56 PM
5

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights03/03/21 01:08 AM
2

Leagueofbabies/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:12 PM
0

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights05/01/21 03:32 AM
0

Social IssuesLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:21 PM
0

DiscriminationLeagueofbabies/r/MensRights17/07/20 09:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The National Guard would be called out as strikebreakers and most of the men on strike would lose their jobs. Those jobs would be given primarily to women. That is what you said.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 02:39 PM
1

Very funny. You are still about as intelligent as a single-celled organism, so have fun with that. When choosing insults, stop thinking about what you yourself lack, and try to target me specifically. It will actually hurt that way. I just don't feel anything knowing that you don't have a dick, or that you are paranoid enough to think that the USA is the whole world. Spoiler, it isn't.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:54 PM
0

Incel isn't used that way currently, though. Either way, I'm not a virgin, and I don't blame women for anything sexually related. Instead, I blame doctors and hospitals for pushing circumcision for profit. A young man doesn't like the way things work against men, in America? He's an incel. That is the only way, that I've ever seen that word used. Do you watch the news? They literally use the word, incel, for everything.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:41 PM
0

Above, the man claimed that 500,000 lost military jobs would be filled immediately by women. I was responding to that post. I have no idea what you're on about, my friend.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:28 PM
0

Those women who left the workforce did so because of their children and lack of childcare, which is still bad right now. They aren't going to come back and work. Not only that, but all of those women sure as hell aren't going to say, "Sure, I'll join the military."
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:20 PM
1

"I'm not wrong and you don't know how to argue, just vomit vague ideas with no basis into reality." And I'm the one vomiting? Normally, when someone uses big words, they aren't using them correctly or effectively. You've checked both of those boxes. Also, please learn to use commas, because they are very important. For example: "I'm not wrong, and you don't know how to argue. You just vomit ideas, with no basis, into reality." The words, vague and no basis, are just redundant, as they both mean …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:09 PM
1

Oh? What have feminists done to curb the circumcision of males? Called uncircumcised dicks disgusting? I rest my case.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:04 PM
0

Incel is a spinoff of infidel, you moron. Where do you think the word came from? Both have in common that one believes differently than you do. I merely did a typo up there but as it stands, infidel= differences in religion and incel= differences in societal beliefs. Both of these terms can be used as you wish since they don't really have a purpose, but to label those who think differently than you do. It's always been about power. Technically, to me at least, you are an incel. How does that mak…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:54 PM
2

I cannot do anything, except express my views, my friend. If you've looked back at the greatest protests and riots of our entire existence, on this pathetic blue planet, many men and women alike fought for a common cause in order to win. Yes, if I was the leader type, I could very well pull millions of people together to fight against their crass labeling of us small guys as expendables. I'm not that charismatic, intelligent, or experienced, though. It takes a lot of effort from someone who trul…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:45 PM
1

No single man can do anything on his own. It relies on men who decide to take up arms against such tyrants. You see, tyrants can't win. They can have money, they can have power, but they can't do everything by themselves. All men have to do is say, No. There also isn't a surplus of men right now, especially with the economy reeling. Less men are working than ever before. People are taking a look back at what they've been slaving over and have had time to contemplate their existence and their goa…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:27 PM
0

I like that. An army of incels can destroy the economy of what they claim to be one of the best countries on the planet. That brings a whole new meaning to the word, incel. Incel was originally supposed to be anyone who opposed your religion for any reason, so it's the best way for you sheep to label men who don't conform to your idiotic societal views. I love it so much. Well done. It's not as much as an insult, as it is an honor, just knowing that I think differently than pathetic people like …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:22 PM
1

You've not only added words to my mouth, but you've completely misunderstood what I said. Most women calling themselves feminists today are anything but. I know, that's a major shocker. Feminism was created to spread equality between the sexes, not solely to press women's power and free perks as a vagina pass to new heights. Letting dangerous people out of prison, who are convicted murderers? Only if they have a pussy. If you call yourself a feminist, and you only fight for women's rights, then …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:17 PM
1

Hah? Most men have saved up enough cash that they could quit their jobs for months. The U.S. economy won't last anywhere near that long without men. They'd be begging at our feet, long before single men got a tenth of the way through their savings.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:03 PM
1

I see. Well, it's certainly easy to say anyone has questionable motives., him included. All politicians care about are, running their mouths, and causing others to suffer thanks to their terrible laws. I respect no man, who has to lie to himself every morning, just to get out of bed.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:01 PM
0

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that there aren't enough unemployed women to fill the gap.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 09:59 PM
1

Those who insult others, often choose things that they themselves lack, as the insult. I pity you.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 09:58 PM
4

You would replace us? Such a foolhardy statement. You could never and will never be able to replace us in any factor. Let's say, by some kind of miracle of God, you are able to fill in all of the missing jobs. Who would take your current jobs? Are you going to work both our jobs and yours at the same time? How long can you keep that up? It is easy to talk shit and play down an entire sex, but it is much harder than you expect to replace things you consider expendable in high numbers. Here's how …
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:32 AM
3

Men and women have always worked together closely. Either sex may not want to admit it, but both men and women are needed. We are both good at different things, we both want similar things, but What I disagree with, is this goddamned notion that men are expendable. Logic and raw emotion both point toward the fact that men are very much needed, now more than ever. Think back on how many new inventions were made primarily by men. Is this because most men were allowed to chase such goals back then …
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:28 AM
2

I guarantee that they don't have enough women to fill 500,000 spots in the National Guard. Maybe some of them, but definitely not all of them.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:21 AM
5

Let me ask you something, friend. Do you think that BlackLivesMatter would have been taken seriously without the riots? I rest my case. This world is led by the blind, and those who follow the blind will often miss making their own decisions based on logic that doesn't directly affect them. When such people are directly affected, they often open their eyes and think about the point being pushed toward them. Such a thing is what has been driving change for hundred of thousands of years on our pla…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:17 AM
3

I'm not sure if you are insulting me for my narrow-minded view, or if you are complimenting me for my undying dedication. Regardless, you are wrong. I view this whole country as a whole, and my dedication to the cause can easily be changed by my experiences. No one can see the future, nor can anyone know everything. I may want men to finally break free from such trashy societal cliches and entrapment, but I will not injure myself for the blind. Those who refuse to open their eyes will be left be…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:08 AM
1

Nothing would make me happier than to see such a day pass. Such a thing would be a kick in the nuts to society and a rude awakening for those who refuse to see us as needed.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:59 AM
4

Women, themselves, are not our enemies guys. The rich, the powerful, the desperate men that bow before women unconditionally, the crazed false feminists, these are our enemies. Do not forget that women can very easily be abused by our systems just as men can. Reasonable men and reasonable women must work together, or we will lose the war.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:58 AM
2

What is current feminism but the degradation of men's rights and the boosting of unfair women's rights? Your country may not yet be in the state that America is in, but trust me when I say this, new Feminism will ruin your men eventually. It may not be today, tomorrow, or even this decade, but feminism will eventually lead to MGM and circumcision. When you devalue men as expendable, you're also letting go of basic human rights for such men. Think about it as older generations did, a slave who is…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:52 AM
0

Very funny. If some dirty feminist cunt wanted my big fat dick, then I'd enjoy her begging for a sweat release that never ever comes. If a real woman that actually deserves it comes along, then I'd invite the feminist, so she can watch what a real woman gets. I think most people call such an act torture, but I call it getting their just desserts.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:36 AM
2

I am not against women at all, so I agree. Women claiming to be feminists aren't even close to the real deal. Not only do they degrade the very name of feminism and women to some clearly senseless bullshit, but they also degrade their own kind into extinction. Good luck finding a man when all of the real women already have them inside of them. I hope feminists are infertile in their 40s and 50s, as just the thought of that happening would actually bring me never-ending pleasure. Yes, I am quite …
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:30 AM
2

Justin Waters? Who in the hell is that? No, this isn't a reference, these are my own unique experiences and ideas put into words. If you dislike them, the door is completely under your control. I do not need weak-minded fools who are too afraid to stand up for their own rights.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:27 AM
4

It really depends on where those half a million quit. All in one state? Prepare for the rapture. All in ten states? Ouch. All in 20 states? Probably not enough to feel anything. The number of men quitting their jobs isn't important. The mere threat of such a catastrophe is. Can you even imagine the full economical impact of ten or twenty-million men quitting their jobs in America in the span of a week? It would break their backs.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:18 AM
1

But can you imagine it? A world where men refuse to work unless given some small glimmer of hope for equality? It would be the end of the entire world as we know it. Regardless of what people believe, this world never could, nor will it ever achieve the ability to function without the sacrifice of men. We both know how this will eventually end, the question is whether we will live to see it.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 04:04 AM
1

The term Good Hospitals doesn't really mean much at all. Back in 1993 when I was circumcised, they sure as hell didn't tell my mother what to look for. Hospitals and doctors are about as trustworthy as 99% of politicians.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 01:42 AM
1

Expecting the parents to pay attention and know what infections or a botched circumcision looks like is like expecting a kid to know the real ramifications of running across the street in front of a car. They don't know anything about that, and the doctor sure as hell isn't going to tell him that he botched it.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 10:13 PM
1

The Queen of United Kingdom took her sons and ran for the hills with them when their family tried to forcibly circumcise them. Don't allow your husband to ruin your boys, because it's your job to protect them.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:29 PM
1

Cosmetically, physically, and mentally scarred thanks to a botched circumcision is not something that is okay ever. I shouldn't have to pay cash out of my pocket for something I never consented to, correct? That's like if they removed my eyelids because my parents didn't like how my eyelids looked. The foreskin and the eyelids serve a similar function, and in my opinion removing either of them makes the person less attractive. So, why do they remove foreskins and not eyelids? They can't sell eye…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:14 PM
2

Yes, we need to keep things civil. It wasn't him that circumcised us anyways, and he was probably misinformed and betrayed by the same doctors and hospitals that misinformed our parents. "It's just a snip. Babies can't feel pain. The foreskin is just a flap of skin and has no function." Oof.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:10 PM
1

You obviously weren't botched then. Let them destroy your dick, give it a year to heal, and then tell me that I'm making stuff up.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:48 PM
1

I'm not really sure why you got downvoted so much. I will say one thing though. You were circumcised as an adult because of a medical problem, and you gave consent. I, however, was forcibly circumcised as an infant with no way to consent, deny, or resist. They also fucked my dick up permanently. There's just no damn excuse for that. Circumcision for medical necessity? Sure. Circumcision because they want to sell my foreskin for profit? Bad. It should honestly be illegal.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:46 PM
2

Sadly, that's 100% true. They just want to profit off of our suffering, because, We won't remember it. Yea right...
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:42 PM
1

Mine was botched extremely badly, unfortunately. Hairy, painful erections, and a lot of embarrassment. There's no way in hell that I'm paying any doctors to look at it. As far as I'm concerned, they were the primary cause behind it. Why make them profit doubly? No thanks.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:39 PM
3

I have pain during every single erection because my circumcision was botched. Just because you did well doesn't mean that all men are so lucky. Even a botch rate of 5% is way too fucking high for an unnecessary operation. All you have to do to clean the foreskin is to wash it. Jesus Christ. I would take that over a mutilated, painful, and hairy dick any day.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 10:37 PM
2

A lot of American 20 something men aren't dating 20 somethings. I went for a 46-year-old woman who was working as a doctor of mine after an accident. Best sex, she buys me stuff, and she doesn't make me pay for everything. Why in the fuck would I want some bitchy 20 something-year-old twat bitching me out when I can just date a sensible older woman? You don't need to feel content with dating trash that was raised in college. My current girlfriend went to college a lot longer than any of those fe…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 07:44 PM
25

I love how most cowards that promote circumcision as a good thing, use outdated and proven false benefits, while also ignoring the men who are directly and permanently maimed by circumcision. Let's say their 3% severe botch rate is accurate. They cut your dick off by accident if you are in that 3%. Now, let's take the men circumcised in America and say the number is 50 million men. 3% is a small number right? Well, not when dealing with large numbers. That means we have 1500000 ruined men walkin…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:22 PM
1

"SQUISH!" "Eww... I stepped on the insect. I told you it was hard not to crush you underfoot. Pahetic."
/r/MensRights15/07/21 08:16 PM
1

I wasn't aware that you were rendered so low, that you couldn't even understand simplistic speech. Since you obviously lack intelligence, either through inbreeding or motherly drug use, I'll make this easy for you. YOU ARE AN INSECT. That's how close to me you are. Do you know what is hard not to do? Crush an insect flat underfoot.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:16 PM
1

You're a level 1 Necromancer, standing before a God. Know your place, you inferior being.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 04:27 PM
1

Wow, you fucking normie. Better late than never I guess.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:43 PM
1

The things that happened to us at birth and for the first three-four years afterwards aren't processing to memory because we lack the ability to do so. And your entire comment is already entirely moot since that's not even close to being true. Take a baby, show it something white like a rabbit, and let the baby play with it. Bring something else white in, let the baby play with it. Then bring a white toy in and let the baby play with it before making loud violent sounds and watch the baby cry. B…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:36 PM
1

Sugar in the bread. Yeast infection in the bed.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 06:52 PM
2

That's not the CDC or Mayo Clinic's place to decide. The AAP is far more qualified to lay down a ruling, and they've chosen the opposite of what those idiots have. CDC can't even prove any disease that circumcision actually prevents. It takes 100 circumcisions to prevent 1% of yeast infections. The HIV protection isn't backed up by science either. Nice try guy. Do you even know what the AAP is?
/r/MensRights22/05/21 06:49 PM
2

First of all, the CDC isn't even the right organization to use there. Funnily enough, the AAP, the one you are speaking of, DOES NOT SUPPORT ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION WITHOUT CAUSE.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:16 PM
3

Can you just stop commenting? No one agrees with your stupid crap. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:54 PM
1

You didn't prove shit wrong. All you did was blow smoke about a lot of stupid operations that can be done on kids. None of those can be compared to a healthy young baby boy having healthy flesh cut from his body. A micropenis would be seen as unnatural... oof. Idiot.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:49 PM
1

an outie belly button doesn't ruin any function. Not only that, but people are a lot less accepting of a deformed sexual organ than a deformed belly button. The rest of what you said isn't fact and can only be seen as your personal preference. I've seen the opposite response from women, who mostly prefer uncircumcised and natural men over circumcised. The biggest reason? They can't give circumcised men head, because they just don't fucking cum. Oof.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 10:48 PM
2

I've tried it in the past, but it takes a long time and I saw few if any results except for less tension when erect. I've started to wear Manhood over my dick and going on a month and a half now, I feel a lot more pleasure during masturbation. The friction from pants on your poor dick really does cause a massive reduction in sensitivity that you don't realize until it's been covered for a while. I just don't want to try and fix this myself either. It wasn't my choice to have it done, and if I ha…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:27 PM
1

How can any of those be compared to the complete removal of a functional part of the body? Micropenis removal doesn't actually remove the penis. It may convert it into a clitoris, but they certainly don't remove anything. I just don't think your argument can hold any water. Piercing isn't even removing anything anyway.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:08 PM
2

Nothing for you, but hospitals will make tens of thousands of dollars off of it. In fact, to get circumcised, you'd need to PAY them. Shocker. "I want my foreskin." "Sorry, sir. It's already been processed as biowaste."
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:03 PM
6

No, it's because this is years of online research. I can hardly be expected to remember any sources for any of these interesting scientific studies. There was one study that I found interesting about permanent brain alterations that never recovered after circumcision as an infant. Their papers were removed and they were considered out of line for wanting to research the changes in the brain before and after circumcision. The American medical field is nothing but a bunch of cowards. If there is a…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:59 PM
5

I've been circumcised, and my circumcision was botched and permanently damaged my penis with no financial support or anything. They don't tell your mother what to watch out for for a reason. No one wants to be held responsible for their mistakes. Someone else has to hold them responsible.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:54 PM
1

It's been a while since I've read a lot of these papers, but they are rather fascinating. Most of these studies have been done in the UK if that helps, but I don't remember where I read it at.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:53 PM
2

That's not restoring anything. You're gently pressuring what little skin you have left to force mitosis which causes new skin to grow. That doesn't replace any of the big parts removed from the penis, like the frenulum. All you're doing is recovering your penis, which could easily be done with a Manhood or something.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:51 PM
1

You do realize how much blood is lost from circumcision right? If the doctor doesn't do the operation right, the child could bleed to death within seconds. What happens when your brain gets deprived of oxygen? Parts of it begin to die. What does that cause? I could go through and list all of these published papers, but are you all really too lazy to go find them for yourselves? I've read and researched this very issue for years now, so I can't be expected to have links to every single paper I've…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:49 PM
6

Infant foreskins can be used to harvest stem cells that aren't tainted by growing older. They are untainted and can be sold for a far higher profit than adult foreskins. That's a leading reason why they refuse to only allow circumcision on a consenting and informed adult. The other reason? A baby can't defend itself.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:47 PM
4

Even if you don't remember it exactly as an infant, if they didn't numb you properly that mental illness will still be there. As an adult, when you want it done and you know what they're doing, you're far less likely to be fucked mentally. As a baby, you have no idea why they're hurting you. Why are you being punished? You don't know where your parents are. Aren't they supposed to protect you? Why won't they help when you're screaming your head off? This experience really does fuck most men up, …
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:44 PM
3

As a baby? That's fucking terrible.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:41 PM
2

People have claimed that circumcision is fueled by religion. Not in America, it isn't.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 05:40 PM
2

Name some things that parents can do legally to permanently alter a child's body besides circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:49 AM
19

That's unfortunate. Most doctors that perform circumcisions can't even name a single benefit or function of the foreskin. Ignorance.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:45 AM
8

You're delusional. Your very first point about lack of empathy, only shows that you completely lack empathy towards your fellow men. You don't care if men suffer, correct? Suffering makes you a real man, right? A big point that you don't seem to understand is not every single circumcision goes well. My circumcision was botched and my penis was fucked up for life. You lack empathy towards my dilemma because it turned out well for you. So, because nothing bad happened with your circumcision, my an…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:43 AM
3

This is actually a really good point.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:33 AM
6

Yes, a psychotic monster to be sure. Unfortunately, the profit they can make from it still keeps such an illogical thing alive and thriving. You can bet your ass that no doctor is going to say, "Well, it would make it harder for him to masturbate if you get him circumcised. What? you don't want that? Fuck... I'm bad at this."
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:32 AM
34

They lack empathy for men. Due to circumcision, many men end up feeling completely detached from their mothers. This can be seen by many circumcised boys first saying Daddy rather than Mommy. What does this detachment do to Mommy? She cared for you while Daddy was at work, but your first word was still Daddy. Must hurt. This leads to our Mothers lacking empathy for us as a result. Maybe your sister said Mommy or something first.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:29 AM
7

Thank you for pointing this out. Jesus had many good morals, and honestly, even though I'm atheist, I still live by a similar moral code. Trying to blame circumcision on religion in the United States isn't exactly correct. It's not why it started, and it's not what it currently stands for. Doctors want that $$$.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:23 AM
8

Ignorant logic. Just take the L on this one, my dude. Circumcision is the cause of many issues we face today. Lack of empathy for your common man, undiagnosed and severe mental health issues, chronic stress, shut-ins, and a lowered birthrate due to the above. All of these things lead directly back to circumcision for many people. They just aren't going to publicly state it very often. Even if they don't realize it, their mental health problems are primarily due to the emotional shock and permane…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:15 AM
9

No, that's a good question. The reason is most mothers are out of it and either doped on drugs or adrenaline after giving birth. They're in no way in a state to give consent. Not only that, but the doctors are vile and hold back important information that would sway them from it intentionally. That makes sense, since if you deny a circumcision, then they don't make that extra $$$. Someone with a cash incentive shouldn't be able to do an unnecessary operation, period.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:07 AM
11

He actually believes that being an unfeeling monster who eats a diet of 90% red beef, makes homosexual and racist jokes, and watches cowboy movies makes you a man. I didn't get where I am right now by being a coward. For me to stand down against this disgusting practice would make me the biggest pussy of all. I won't relent until the misdeeds against me have been dealt with. I think they call that... revenge. Of course, for the AAP and the medical system, it's instead a reckoning.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:05 AM
3

So many others should have to suffer for the few? Ridiculous. I say to hell with the few, toss them aside like the useless scum they are. They certainly didn't do me any favors.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:59 AM
0

Also would be nice if you could support your cash grab statement with the amount of profit that I'd made from circumcision and see if it's significantly more than other operations on newborns the amount of profit that I'd made from circumcision. You used the term I'd to describe the profit from circumcision. Did you just claim to be a circumcision doctor by accident?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:57 AM
1

It's funny because circumcision is a NEEDLESS operation. You have no right to profit off of cutting healthy flesh from anyone's body. You've already broken your oath to do no harm. The illegal flesh trade of circumcision puts each foreskin at tens of thousands of dollars. You donate it, but you probably still make cash off of it considering that they sell the damn products for so much. To think that I'd be circumcised to make a facial cream or a medical drug is just appalling. There are too many…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:48 AM
3

No, that's bullshit logic. My parents can't decide to have me tattooed, and they can't decide to have me cosmetically altered in any other way besides circumcision. Your logic doesn't hold up, bud. It never did. Circumcision is only accepted because it's a braindead cultural thing that was always a cash grab.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:42 AM
12

Read my post above obviously. Circumcision just destroys so much that a man should have from birth. They disgrace us, tell us to man up to the trauma and damage, and then create a massive empathy gap between men and women. All you have to do is look up a couple of published documents on the web and you'll soon see why circumcision is bad. America just keeps on trying to make up benefits that don't exist.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:40 AM
10

Religion has nothing to do with it in America. In case you haven't noticed, 80% of young people in America are athiest. We don't believe in that shit and we never did. Any intellectual would see through such phony nonsense. They talk about Christianity, but they hate gays. What would Jesus do? He'd surely be disappointed. It's all about money. It always has been in America.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:34 AM
11

Did you really just insult my intelligence by calling me a baby? It's always the most ignorant about circumcision that are so obstinately against ending it. What do you know about the functions of the foreskin? What do you know about the complications of circumcision? What do you know about the botched rates and or other disadvantages? Nothing. You know absolutely nothing about the subject I'm talking about, and yet you claim that I'm overacting. I'd like to see you suffer a botched circumcision…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 02:11 AM
1

This is invalid information. It's been proven in many studies that women prefer the feel of uncircumcised men. The only time women even prefer the look of a circumcised dick is when it's flaccid, but it looks so pathetically small when flaccid and circumcised. This leads to lockerroom anxiety for men, and it's also been proven that circumcision reduces the length of a penis very significantly. Sex with a natural penis is superior and requires next to no lube. Women don't complain of tearing, or …
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:18 AM
1

This. It would be okay to do circumcisions if an adult requested it. A baby can't consent, and should thus be left alone until they can give informed consent. Soggy Ad is among the minority that would go ahead and have it done anyway. I wouldn't have. I'm not religious and I wouldn't mind taking a minute each morning to clean my dick. It's just ridiculous with no benefits for me and only disadvantages. It does benefit the doctors and hospitals with cash though.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:14 AM
1

I don't have a source, unfortunately. I read about this a long time ago, but the study was done and published in the UK I think. This was a major reason for the UK being appalled by American circumcision. They can see the damage it causes with logic and science, but the AAP refuses to believe it. They did change their stance on circumcision not being routinely advised, but that's just the AAP trying to cover their ass.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:10 AM
4

This might come off as dark, but there's a proven link between SIDS and circumcision. Circumcised babies are ten times more likely to die of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, which is what doctors call it to cover their own asses. No child dies for no reason. Probably unchecked internal bleeding after circumcision causes SIDS 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:07 AM
11

You're an absolute moron. Circumcision is a serious Men's Right's issue. You're really going to teach men to give consent when we don't get any fresh out of the womb? Fuck off. Circumcision causes permanent damage, and it's done on infants because they know no one would have it done as an adult. A bunch of sadistic fetishistic money-grubbing doctors cutting baby boys for profit. Get off of Men's Rights, because there's a good reason this issue is being spammed. It cuts deep into any male who fig…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:43 AM
1

What's funny is the fact that you use we to describe those who manipulated them. That's like saying we enslaved black people. No, I never owned or condoned such a disgusting act as owning a black person as a slave. The we, you're talking about are all long dead. I never oppressed a woman, so why should women get to oppress me? You see where I'm going with this? It's just... logical.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:26 AM
1

I laugh at such nonsensical logic. Women have committed just as many crimes, if not more, but they're just rarely tried for them. Who was it to incite the murder of kings? The greedy wives of men that wanted more. There was an old wives tale of the executioner and the king. The executioner was the one to enact judgment on the ones who disobeyed the king's rules and incited the root of rebellion upon his people. One day, the executioner agreed with the man he was about to execute. He realized tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 02:03 AM
1

You see, this is part of my belief on the matter and it pushes me to enact on such things even further. Despite religion or race, all men can be harmed by and can realize the destruction of circumcision. Many American's might call out Muslims and Jews as the root issue, but that's completely ignoring us as human beings. Under the skin and away from all societal differences, we're men. And... although many extremists might blindly agree, many others disagree. Why do we fight such people when our …
/r/MensRights01/05/21 01:40 AM
1

It's kind of funny, that many great conquerors have said the same damn thing. Divide and conqueror. By dividing men, they have already beaten us. Black, white, yellow, red, etc. it really doesn't matter what your skin color is. We're no different beneath the skin. We have our wants, our needs, and our dreams. Give into racism and you end your chance of rallying behind your fellow men. We don't win if we don't fight together. KKK, Panthers, they're all just ways to keep us, men, down. White men a…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 01:03 AM
1

Then fight back! Why do you allow such things to exist!? The power is with the majority. IF men stood up as a whole and said no, then most of these issues would be quelled immediately. In the end, you need to decide, what will you tolerate? What would you allow to happen to yourself, to your sons? If you don't agree with your country, then it's probably time for a bit of... change. Humans cannot free themselves from torment unless they're willing to face such things head-on. It might be hard but…
/r/MensRights01/05/21 12:56 AM
1

You do realize that feminist trash likes to come to our forum to downvote posts right? I've seen it a lot, especially when you give valid information.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 05:52 PM
1

I'm not sure if you've realized this, but men tend to be targeted by laws in America, not women. We're a bit late to the game if we want to change that now. Give it a couple of decades and maybe it'll happen. It's just... the goal isn't realistic right now. How are you going to target these women who post with a fetusdeletus post? How are you going to make it illegal for them to abort their child for being male when women can abort if they want to. Their body, their choice movement just killed a…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 05:46 PM
4

You see, my issue with what you're saying is the fact that I'm absolutely fucking pissed about being forcibly circumcised as a baby, with no way to give consent. To make it worse, they botched my circumcision and fucked my dick up with no liability. They teach men to give consent in elementary school nowadays, and yet we don't get to consent from the day we're born. Do you know what someone said I had? A victim mentality. Wait... isn't that because... I don't know... I'M A VICTIM!? If someone ro…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:06 AM
2

If you want my 2 cents, I believe that America is breeding angry men on purpose. For what reason? I have no fucking idea. This kind of attitude towards men and women is supported by the news and society because of that. I've brainstormed many ideas, but I haven't had a single idea that makes sense yet. Does anyone else have any ideas why America would want their men to be sad, lonely, angry, and destructive?
/r/MensRights25/04/21 11:49 PM
1

Okay, relax buddy. I used a dose of sarcasm for good measure, but you're taking it seriously. I'm in no way saying anything feminists do is right. I'm on Men's Rights for a reason, but I just don't know how we can stop them legally from doing something like this. Hopefully, it doesn't become widespread, but you never know.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 11:45 PM
1

Oh, I'm not saying that feminists aren't completely in the wrong by any means doing something so horrible, but how are laws supposed to prevent this without preventing a rape victim from getting an abortion?
/r/MensRights25/04/21 11:43 PM
1

There's a difference between any animal and a human being. That lump of cells could grow up to be a great person who creates something humanity sorely needs. They could solve problems that no one else can, and yet you have the audacity to compare human life to a fucking fly? You're sick as fuck. In no way, shape or form can any stupid animal be compared to a human being. We outclass all life on this planet in terms of raw potential intelligence. Unfortunately, guys like you don't use much of it.…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:23 PM
0

No, you don't know what genocide means at all. Genocide is wiping out an entire race/gender/community. By community, I mean things like straight or gay men, etc. Women would have to mass murder men in the streets, which won't turn out well for them. Not enough women actually do this kind of forbidden trash to actually make a dent in the male population. You'd better bet that the only ones even thinking about doing such a thing are insane radical feminists, and even they will have second thoughts…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:22 PM
-1

That's not genocide my friend, it's just plain old murder, but I do agree that it's despicable. On the bright side, 9/10 women deeply regret and are haunted permanently by doing such things. Let them ruin their own lives because you can't possibly think you can prevent a single case of this. The only women that never suffer after doing something so vile, are quite frankly, psychopaths. The number of females actually performing this trash is likely not even in the double digits.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:59 PM
7

That's a damn good point.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:11 AM
1

You are misusing the word misandrist. Not only did you spell it wrong, but there was never a time when I said I hate men in any way, shape, or form. mis·an·drist /miˈsandrist/ Learn to pronounce noun a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against men. "the counterpart to a misogynist is a misandrist" adjective relating to or characteristic of a misandrist. "the university is teaching misandrist lies" This may come as an absolute surprise to your dimwitted brain, Bob, but I'M …
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:23 AM
3

Toxic masculinity isn't a toxic behavior, you moron. It's like Spongebob where I gotta ask you, HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TEACH YOU THIS LESSON OLD MAN!? Toxic masculinity is the BELIEF that men have to be a certain toxic way. Although, I know you're probably mentally handicapped, and a tilted idiot with your responses, you should at least be able to understand that much. The reason why they call such a thing toxic masculinity? Because it's just TOXIC. Being strong does not mean being an unfe…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:13 AM
2

That's because you guys don't even fucking try. There is no RULE about feminists. Every single feminist has their own reasons and even different beliefs. You can't save them all, but that doesn't mean some can't be shown that they're wrong.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:06 AM
-1

Didn't you just repeat the same thing as before? This isn't even a debate with a close-minded fool, such as yourself. You're lost if even you yourself don't want to compromise. You're everything wrong with MRA, so do us all a favor and slot off this forum. Your one issue with your term is that you're just absolutely wrong. Toxic masculinity isn't a male behavior, instead, it's a societal view forced upon men. Although toxic masculinity seems to point at men, it's more than that. Men can act upon…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 05:20 PM
2

At first, I did just that. I'm not gay, but I've never thought it was right to harass gay men or tell them that they simply can't be gay, which doesn't work anyway. I've been punished many times over my childhood for thinking differently from the masses. I've been bullied, made fun of, punished by teachers, and just kicked while I was down by society for thinking differently. You have that same pathetic mindset that MRA and Feminists cannot unite. Not only are you intentionally dividing us even …
/r/MensRights21/03/21 05:11 PM
1

Feminists are human. Humans can be changed. The main reason why the MRA movement is failing, is that all we do is flame the brainwashed feminists for making biased bullcrap claims, instead of proving why they're completely wrong. The feminist I talked to in real life has seemed to clamor up now instead of shit talk men. Why? She knows in her heart that I was 100% correct. You can't spread hate and expect to break this vicious cycle of disgusting injustice. Divide and conquer is a valid tactic us…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 05:03 PM
-1

There is such a thing as toxic masculinity, and it's the idea of how men should be unfeeling badasses that give up everything for others. Although you're correct about the non-genderless part, toxic masculinity can be used by both men and women, and it's not a male-only problem. You are ignorant, however, to say that it doesn't exist. Look up the definition. I mean, at least do your damn research before calling me out.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 04:56 PM
4

I've been back and forth on the whole topic. Men's rights vs Women's rights is a very complex tree and many parts you wouldn't even think of without someone informing you of it. Why were men allowed to vote and not women? Men fought and died in wars dating back to the start of our existence. Women fought for the right to vote and gained it, but they still don't have to sign up for the draft. What did women do to deserve that right? It's not equal that they can vote as well, because men are still…
/r/MensRights21/03/21 04:48 AM
1

I never said that current-day feminism was a good thing. Beyond getting the right to vote, most of the changes have been detrimental to the well-being of society. At a certain point, they'll obliterate the birth rate by forcing men away from women altogether. The more feminism wins, the lower the birth rate will go, mark my words.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 06:24 PM
1

No, I entirely agree with what you're saying, but I believe it's more than that. Religion was our biggest blunder by far. What created those expectations of society? What beat itself into countless peoples' heads to be seen as truth? What divided us greatly from the very beginning? Religion. Two different religions can never meet eye to eye, even if they basically believe in the same things. Looking back towards the start, religion was created by man. This means, that religion can be changed and…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 05:54 PM
1

Well, you can say that, but then shouldn't they keep the talk to the thread it was made in? Why go so far as to private message me with nothing but hate? Well, regardless of that, I propose that we don't even try to work with feminists at all. They've already proven that they don't want equality. Instead, why not work with women who haven't given into senseless hate directed at men? Men are logical, and we can certainly work together if we try hard enough. Women can be emotional and can do illog…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 05:35 PM
2

Please stop downvoting this guy. His post is hilarious and you're going to get it hidden. I don't think he was being serious. Double_Pickaxe, I have a good anime for you to watch to restore your belief in good anime. Boku No Pico. It's the kind of anime that you can just hop right into.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:53 PM
3

Sadly, I think we all have. You have to trudge through the rubble to find the good gems. That almost goes for any entertainment though. I do hate that part of it being funny that a male gets hurt though. It's really not 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:51 PM
3

I feel like you're just watching shitty animes. Do you just hop on randomanime.org and go to town or something? Steins Gate and many other anime have interesting protagonists and no female on male violence to speak of. It heavily depends on the genre, but most ecchi and comedy anime tend to have that anti-male part added in for fun. It's fun for men to get hit apparently, even if it's a low blow. Don't judge all anime on something that isn't in all of them.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:47 PM
1

Oh no, the talk went from intelligent to borderline unintelligent and fast. Were you perhaps dropped on your head by your mother as a child? It honestly wouldn't surprise me if you were.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 03:05 PM
2

No, I think I see what you're saying. The way I phrased it was just misleading. I also see what you're saying about it beginning as a movement for equality for all that somehow became only about women. The word fem just makes it seem like a women's rights movement, but that's basically what modern-day feminism is. They certainly aren't fighting for equality anymore. Such a shame.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 07:49 PM
1

Current-day feminism is nothing about equality, and we both know that. Feminism started as equality for women. If you think about the word feminine, then it allures towards women. Feminism just leaves men out altogether anyway, so why not call it Women's Rights?
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:49 PM
1

You do realize that the term, old days, can mean anytime in the past, right? Feminism has also existed long before it was even called feminism. I actually dislike such a term. Why is it not called Women's Rights? Feminism just doesn't sound right at all.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:32 PM
1

I can't argue with that. Conscription should have never been a thing, to begin with. "Sir, our men don't want to be forced into military duty to die for your own selfish desires. They're refusing to fight." "Well, they do have a choice. Join the military by force or go to prison." "Right sir." The biggest issue I have with forced conscription is that many wars humans fight have absolutely no meaning to most people involved. The ones who get meaning out of it are usually safe at home watching the…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:30 PM
0

You could also stone your neighbor for being gay, or crush someone's bones because they wouldn't admit to being a heretic. What's your point?
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:57 PM
1

But someone used conscription as an excuse for not letting women vote in the first place. If it was considered morally unjust to let a woman serve in the armed forces, at the time, then that's on society. Who's to blame? Both men and women.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:55 PM
1

I'm not saying that men didn't suffer. All I said was that once upon a time, feminism was doing good things for society. The counterclaim came from some guy saying that feminism, was NEVER a good thing. Do you know what never implies? All of history... lol.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:45 PM
1

I said women have been oppressed before and were fighting for equal rights, but you guys immediately threw my claim out the window. If you had just let me explain, that I was talking about ALL OF HISTORY, then maybe you wouldn't be confused in the first place. Feminism has always been around, even if it wasn't exactly called feminism. The statement the man-made was that feminism was NEVER a good thing. That claim goes a lot further back than the fucking 1900s. If you say feminism was never a goo…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:39 PM
1

You guys only go so far back in history, which I find to be conniving. There were plenty of points in history where nothing you said actually applied. Who stayed home to watch your children? Who bore the burden of having your children? Even before women worked their asses off in real jobs, being a stay-at-home mother wasn't all sunshine and rainbows. It gave all of the power to the man because he had wealth. That's something the mother couldn't get since she wasn't ALLOWED to work. Watching and …
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:58 PM
-2

I'm not even going to reply to this shit. You're hopeless. I'd hate to say it, but I think the term Mysoginist actually describes most of you to a T. Too bad current feminists don't use it correctly, and it's kind of lost all meaning.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:52 PM
1

Why do you all keep bringing up only America's time period? I'm not talking about America only. It's like you all think America is the only country on this entire planet. This is how women were treated across all time. When you're looking at issues such as feminism, and men's rights you have to look back far in history to see how they were treated before. Were women ever oppressed in the entire history of the world? Yes. Were there reasons once upon a time to fight for equality? Yes. Are women s…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:45 PM
-1

America isn't the first civilzation. I'm talking about all throughout history. Back thousands of years ago you could hit your wife for opening her mouth, and even recently in other countries you still can/could until recently.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:41 PM
0

I'm talking about before America was even a thing, you moron. Think back to when the Spartans were running around, and then knights. Women would get smashed by a man who had a 2-H Greatsword because they weren't used to cut, but rather bludgeon. Why is it so hard to understand that this is only still a thing because it had deep roots in ancient civilizations? Is it fair? No, but it's going to take a lot of convincing to get people to change a custom that's been around for thousands of years.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:39 PM
2

It's quite ridiculous, but whatever. Some men's rights activists are similar to fucking feminists and they just don't see it. What can yah do?
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:36 PM
-7

Wait, what? Your excuse is that men have to sign up for the military? Women aren't physically strong enough for melee combat, so it made sense that the able-bodied men would fight before guns were invented. Forced conscription is more of an outdated social issue than a feminist issue and first began back before guns were a thing. Why in the world would they force women into hand-to-hand combat with weapons in the first place? Women can't fight men in melee combat and win. That's not even a reaso…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:41 PM
-10

I mean, you make a damn good point except for the never been part. Women weren't innately given the right to vote or speak out in public. A woman could be smacked by a man for saying her mind, and let's be real here, what did men do to get the right to vote and speak out in public, while women weren't allowed to? Nothing. It was a system created by men that left women out intentionally. That's no better than all of these toxic feminists gaming the new system they're creating. More rights! More r…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 07:53 PM
-4

What responsibility did men have that allowed them the right to vote, while women were left out? I'm curious.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 07:39 PM
-1

Feminism at least back in the old days could be seen as a good thing. They wanted equal rights to men, which they deserved. Men can't live without women and women can't live without men. If one side is unhappy and oppressed, then the other side will surely suffer the backlash as well. The issue with modern feminism, is that it's about demonizing men and adding privileges to women that men don't already have. We already have no say in reproductive rights, we're demonized in the news, and everythi…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 07:27 PM
16

I'm not surprised when Austraila is run by some stupid feminist trash, who thinks anime is the devil. She managed to get some volumes of anime taken down, for having girls who weren't "Old enough" On the cover, while they were still fully clothed. Yes, anime girls now go from babies, directly to fully-grown adults.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 02:54 PM
2

If that makes you a bitch, then the queen of England is a bitch. You know why? She denied that her sons be circumcised, as was their custom. She got some pushback, but she kept strong. Any good mother should protect her children from harm, no matter what others think.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 05:20 PM
1

We need a better system, but it might actually be easier to create our own artificial planet in the sky and move there instead. We can call it, The United States of Sky.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:52 PM
2

Them: "Here's a small amount of money. That should last you through the pandemic. Sorry that you lost your job since you work as a personal trainer." Me: "Hey, jackass... this doesn't even pay one month's rent!"
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:50 PM
3

That is fucking terrible. I would have strangled that bitch if it was my child. Thank God that he didn't lose his cool and accidentally kill her. Forcing circumcision on your own child is bad enough, but forcing circumcision on someone else's child is absolutely unforgivable. They could have sued her off of the face of the planet, and made her life a living hell in prison. You can't take someone's baby and make a permanent modification to it. That's against the law.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:48 PM
3

Child molestation is the correct term actually. They aren't raping them, they are molesting them. Anyway, they really don't know what those estrogen receptors do, but they're probably important. I'm more concerned about a lowered immune system in my private region, allowing Covid-19 to destroy my testicles. It's already been proven that after Covid-19, men have a far lower testosterone serum count, because the virus attacked their testicles directly. Were these men circumcised? Is this damage to…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:45 PM
3

It's even worse for atheists because we often see such things as negatives. If thinking about any body modification negatively the outcome is always bad. I like the look of an uncircumcised penis better than this mangled scarred dick I have. They look fuller when flaccid, and when erect they are actually beautiful, unlike mine. It's really just not fair to be gimped and have my body modified without my permission. It really makes me spiteful towards religion and hospitals. I wonder what God woul…
/r/MensRights06/02/21 03:41 PM
0

It really grinds my gears how you dumbasses compare my title to feminist bullshit 24/7. One of those is a sex and mine is a problem with old people. Old people can be man or woman. They're old, tired, and hateful because they feel like shit. Men aren't rapists or "All shit." Feminists are using that for a completely different reason than I am. Old people are, quite frankly, just prone to being toxic. It's not because of them as a person, but because their actions are ruled by pain, bitter loneli…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:51 PM
0

You didn't even follow the post and answer anything except full-on flame like a fuckin cunt. People don't hate me upon meeting me you stupid little shit. That's primarily old people I've come in contact with because they're old, burned out, angry trash. Men and women are sexes, old people are just old. There's a difference between calling out an entire sex like, "Men are all shit.", and calling out old people for their disgustingly toxic behavior. There's like 90% that are total dogshit. I had o…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:43 PM
0

The same logic can't even be applied. I don't say, "All old people are trash.", to cover my ass about something I shouldn't be allowed to do in the first place. Women tend to hate like that blindly because it makes them feel privileged, and it gives them something else to hate on besides other women. Maybe I'm just done with old people, and that's fine. I don't and I won't care for them anymore. I doubt a single one of you fucks has had to care for an elderly person, so where the fuck do you get…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:40 PM
0

You didn't even read THE POST, you fat inbred goblin. You read the title and downvoted. Point out where I asked my old aunt or parents for anything after caring for them. All I was pointing out is, I was wasting my free time caring for them. I could have had a full-time job rather than a part-time job. I'm getting nothing for spending all of my free time to help an old and ungrateful person. I can't wealth build when I have to literally do everything for someone else.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 08:35 PM
-3

Yea, well it doesn't help that the old people come at me with bigotry first. What do they call it? An eye for an eye? If old people aren't going to show younger people like myself any respect, then they aren't getting any from me. Also, it's not really unreasonable when 90% of old people I've been in contact with have been absolutely toxic.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 03:51 AM
13

Anti-depressants cause erectile dysfunction and many other problems 90% of the time, so it's probably good that they oppose this. All antidepressants do is mask the depression. If they really want to help men, then they will solve the common problems men face the best ways they can. Men need more rights that women have already had for years, and men need the same level of help and understanding that women receive. If society never decides to start showing men some compassion, then this is only g…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 03:48 AM
2

Why do people always take the woman's side in this? The stupid bitch even admitted to knowing he wasn't interested ahead of time. She kept going back because she wanted to. Most men should be like this guy and avoid getting into a serious relationship at all costs. Women use us, and the entire system is unfair towards us in America. Men need to protect themselves from these vultures.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:01 PM
4

They aren't using any of their brain cells at all, actually. They're like a herd of buffalo following the leader off of a cliff. Just try to ignore the feminists and let them end feminism themselves when they figure out they can't get real love from a man by being a bitch. Maybe they'll become Amazons and die off? One could hope.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:54 PM
6

The funny thing is that 1% extreme botched rate with the severing of the entire penis or glands, when taken how many men in America get circumcised is over half a million men. For every 50 million men circumcised that's 500k who had it botched badly. Compare the number of men with a botched circumcision to FGM worldwide, and you'll see that FGM is far less prevelanet. More men suffer permanent debilitating cosmetic and functional damage, and yet America allows it. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:48 PM
2

I don't think many online places like men. Look at google search results for men's rights, and you'll see a lot of feminist anti-man shit.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 08:26 PM
2

Fair enough. I just thought I'd throw the warning out there. Also, don't believe that it's a rare complication. Nearly every man that gets a vasectomy will have chronic pain eventually, maybe not severe, but you'll know it's there. Idk about you, but I don't like the feeling of being kicked in my nuts constantly. I only know this because a friend of mine had a vasectomy that got as far as testicle removal to stop the pain. Nothing they did, not even reverting the vasectomy did a damn thing. Be v…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 04:15 AM
3

Don't get a vasectomy, man. It's nearly permanent and can lead to chronic problems that will never improve. Reversal isn't guaranteed to work, and the sharp testicle pain and other issues might never go away. Sperm isn't supposed to meet your blood, and the white blood cells will attack the sperm when it leaks from a cut end of a spermatic cord. These white blood cells will then target your testicles and damage them, causing permanent damage to the testicles and testosterone production. This hap…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 07:30 PM
8

I get more pleasure from solo masturbation than one-night-stand sex with a condom on. I'd rather just beat off and not have sex with latex. I can do that whenever I want, and I don't have to worry about any of that shit. The way American is heading, I'm sure many more men will become like me. It's just not worth getting fucked by a woman. Of course, if you find real love, then go for it, but until then just jack off. It's really not worth having sex with a condom. I don't finish even thirty minu…
/r/MensRights24/12/20 07:24 PM
4

Yea and then all the straight women suddenly realize that they can't get a man. I'm sure that will turn out well. Literally only the 10/10 multi-millionaire women would have a chance at reproducing then. 90% of straight women better get used to eating carpet for the rest of their lives. I can already see the news headline now: 90% of men killed on Earth, women most affected.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 05:37 PM
1

The funny thing is, the doctors won't ask you if you want to sell it. They'll cut it off of you, and when you ask for it, they'll say, "Sorry, we can't give you your foreskin, because it's already been discarded as medical waste." In other words, they've already prepped it for sale.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 05:44 PM
5

Honestly, that isn't saying much, all things considered. If there's anyone here wanting to change someone's perspective on something, it's you. I'm just spewing out facts that your tiny brain can't protest because, quite frankly, you have no fucking idea what you're talking about. I can't just decide not to be a victim. It's already happened, and I was already damaged by it.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:29 PM
7

"You cannot force people to be victims" Yes, you're correct. You can't force someone to be a victim, because they either are or they aren't. False rape accusation doesn't make the woman a victim since it didn't happen. A man victimized by money-hungry sadistic fetish freak doctors, is a victim, whether he believes he is or not. As much as I'd hate to say it, you too are a victim.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:27 PM
6

A lot more women oppose circumcision than men think, even women who aren't mothers. Sex is better with uncircumcised dicks, it always has been. I think we're actually at a turning point with the dropping rates of circumcision. We can't afford to rest yet though. Keep fighting and get your opinions out there. The more people who know about the negatives of circumcision the better-off men's genital rights are.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:43 PM
9

Don't give me that bullcrap. Washing an uncircumcised dick makes it just as clean as a circumcised dick. You're a damn airhead.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:08 PM
5

You and Mutantdylan are very similar, with that victim speel. I'm beginning to think you have two accounts here. If you're raped in the ass, then you're a victim, regardless if you think you are or not. If you're robbed at gunpoint, then you're a victim even if you think you aren't. Your entire logic is one-sided bullshit, with nothing to back it up.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:06 PM
5

The reason you lose is because of that stupid ass victim crap you're spewing. By your logic, someone raped in the ass while underage isn't a victim if they decide they aren't. That's not how that works.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 09:03 PM
5

You're the one with a stick up his ass. You've already lost this debate, so do us all a favor and shut up.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:10 PM
7

Yes, they failed you. Their ignorance cannot be forgiven, although, doctors and hospitals are more at blame than your parents. Were your parents informed of the possibility of a botched circumcision and what to watch out for? No. Were they informed of the losses of sexual function? No. Your parents didn't do any research and had no idea what they were agreeing to, but ignorance doesn't make it right. If I said parents circumcising their daughter's clit weren't failures, then you'd all eat me ali…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 07:41 PM
11

If people think that no celebrities are outspoken against circumcision, then you're absolutely wrong. https://www.babygaga.com/15-celebs-who-have-spoken-out-against-circumcision/
/r/MensRights17/12/20 06:13 PM
6

There is literally permanent scarring and build-up of protective skin on the penis due to friction burns. When you masturbate without lubricant, you're increasing the friction on your flesh to unsafe levels. The penile skin is elastic, but circumcised men have scars. These scars aren't elastic, and can easily be damaged when stretched too far. You're full of shit. You're so stupid. Every single argument you make it so uneducated that you make me think you're literally trolling. NERVES ON THE GEN…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:56 PM
6

A parent's job is to protect their children from any harm. If they don't bother to understand the scope of an operation, then they've failed their role as parents. Many circumcised men never trust their parents ever again, especially if they were cut without propper numbing of the penis first. I don't blame them one bit.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:49 PM
8

So, let's say you are 1% of the men who get a botched circumcision, and your penis is ruined for life. That would be very important to you when you found out. "Honey, I'm not going down on that. Your cock looks like a hairy pickle!"
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:47 PM
8

This is actually a benefit for men when Foregen or another company succeeds in reattaching functional foreskins. Idiots like you that have the part cut off, can then donate it to me, so I have a foreskin to get reattached. Thanks for your sacrifice.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:44 PM
6

Masturbating without lubrication as a circumcised man is like taking sandpaper to your genitals. So no. Masturbation after circumcision requires lubricant or lotion. If you masturbate dry, you have a good chance of damaging the sensitive skin even more. Not only that, but it just wasn't made to be jerked on without any lubrication.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:38 PM
8

Wait what? I said half of her clit is removed. She can still orgasm. It'll just take a lot longer. Or, instead of just cutting the clit in half, remove 50% of the flesh on the clit. See how that works for women.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:22 PM
2

Obviously, by men, I mean all men. Those circumcised later in life, and the infants circumcised without any consent. Those babies will grow up to be men who suffer from the damage of circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:19 PM
6

Okay, I'll take that debate. So you say the foreskin has no function? The foreskin allows natural lubrication and a sliding motion during masturbation and sex. The circumcised penis completely lacks this function, requiring more lubricant. Did you ever wonder why circumcised guys have 20 bottles of lotion next to their bed? Well, now you know.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:15 PM
3

This actually made me spit my cherry coke up as I was scrolling down through the comments. Well played.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:13 PM
2

I'm telling you the hospital's reasons for pushing it on infants. However, their reasoning is heavily influenced by infant foreskins being worth more cash than adult foreskins. I agree with you, and I don't believe infants should be targeted. For adults, it's easier to tell how much skin to remove, but for babies, the botch rate of too much-removed shaft skin is too high. Edit: Let's do some simple math. Let's say 50,000,000 men are circumcised. Out of those 50,000,000 we have 1% of them with se…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 05:06 PM
8

I'm already a supporter of Foregen, and no I wasn't able to sue. I found out the reason the girls in high school began avoiding me and other boys snickering at me when I was changing in the lockerroom was because of my botched circumcision too late. They even called me Chewbacca, and I had no idea why. I found out that my penis wasn't normal at age 25, thanks to an anti-circumcision ad. They said the statute of limitations ran out at age 21 to sue, so I'll just make society pay by refusing to pa…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:53 PM
11

It's not so pointless when it's fucking botched you ape! Get your troll account out of here. We'll see how pointless it is when a man loses his entire penis and gets raised as a woman and then commits suicide. Wait... that already happened.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:49 PM
10

HAHAHAHA! You idiot! The foreskin is a massive amount of the total penile skin when we become adults. How about we turn this around? We cut off half of your clit, and then we see how victimized you feel.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:46 PM
3

The issue with this is the regret they'll feel months and years after circumcision. They know what an intact penis feels like, unlike us poor mutilated babies. They'll remain sensitive at first, which is when doctors conveniently decide to compare circumcised to uncircumcised sensitivity, but give it a couple of months, and when their glands cornify, they will fully regret fixing something that wasn't broken to start with. Also, hospitals want baby foreskins because they're young and untainted, …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:43 PM
14

I agree. It's a trust issue because we didn't get to consent and all of the reasons for circumcising are bullshit. It's just so hospitals can profit off of our suffering. When you add that disgusting fact of nonconsent into the mix, it makes men feel violated by not only their parents, hospitals, and doctors, but by their entire society as a whole. Society blows off our rage about this topic, they say none of the damage we face every day is true. What's funny, is that America is losing a lot of …
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:36 PM
1

Yes, yes I did lol. This was meant to be to the guy above.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 11:20 PM
1

Seeing as 90% of the circumcisions done in America are not religious, you're absolutely wrong.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 08:31 PM
4

Circumcision rates have already vastly decreased compared to when I was born in 1993. This shows that a lot of mothers are becoming informed about the possible negatives that they were never told about. The only way mothers can be made aware of this, is if the doctors have to talk about the lost functions of the foreskin and that it isn't, "Just a flap of skin.", as well as talk about the repercussions of a botched circumcision. With the correct information made available for women to choose, th…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:43 PM
1

Yes, this problem is far bigger than just circumcision. There is no way to tell if they are profiting off of the flesh and other byproducts of surgery. Infant foreskins are young and the cells can be manipulated easier and can take on the form of many body tissues. That's basically the reason why selling infant foreskins is so profitable. They have a wide amount of uses.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:38 PM
1

I do have one simple question for you. If my idea is so dumb, then what would you do to end circumcision in America? We've already tried banning it, but it got shot down. I'm not being rude to you, but I'm actually curious what others think about this.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:36 AM
1

It doesn't even matter how much the going price is. Neither of us can ever prove how much a foreskin actually is because you can't openly sell them. All you can do is compare products made from foreskins. I don't care how much $ they make from selling our foreskins, I care about the fact that they cut off our foreskins just to profit. They could make 1$ per foreskin sold and I'd still flip my shit.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:08 AM
1

Why would you see any solid evidence of it being the driving force behind the practice? Hospitals know damn well that if such a thing became common knowledge, they would face severe backlash. America never practiced circumcision due to religion. We began practicing it because we listened to some crackhead about how circumcision can solve problems like mental retardation and lead to a Calmer man AKA a man with a lower sex drive. Okay, I'm sure I don't have to tell you that his claims are bullshit…
/r/MensRights16/12/20 04:05 AM
2

Because that's 100k$ less to put in their pockets. I don't want hospitals or doctors making that 100k$. Circumcision won't be a very ideal choice then. Imagine all of the lawsuits filed for botched circumcisions. They'd lose more cash than they'd gain by doing them.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:13 AM
1

The issue with this is that you'll never succeed. People of religion will block you, and society doesn't even show empathy towards men to start with. A ban on male circumcision will fail. We need to do something else. Of course, there can be exceptions made for burn victims.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 01:11 AM
1

It heavily depends on location, but foreskins can easily sell for 100k each. One foreskin makes enough cells to create hundreds of thousands of dollars of cosmetic products that famous people will pay for. Oprah is well known for advocating for foreskin facials. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:16 AM
2

It's actually completely illegal to sell human flesh in most parts of the world. You cannot sell foreskins openly, as you'll be targeted by law enforcement. However, you can openly sell the byproducts of the foreskins. This is a major problem that has to be addressed.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:15 AM
1

I'm not sure how much a doctor makes circumcising, but it's certainly not 100k$ That much profit gives the hospital a heavy bias towards circumcision for obvious reasons. With that bias removed, I think circumcision rates will plummet.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 12:10 AM
3

Our mothers aren't the crazy ones. They aren't properly informed about circumcision and it's botched consequences on purpose. They are pressured by doctors to get a quick snip done. The mothers have no idea what circumcision even means. They can't even reliably see that the circumcision was botched unless it was horrifically mutilated and ruined.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 10:08 PM
6

Even if doctors don't profit off of the foreskins and hospitals do, you have to agree that it's still completely wrong. How would you know that doctors don't profit off of foreskin resale? You can't even track what they do with the flesh, so you can't rule anything out. Corrupt for-profit medical should be abolished.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 10:01 PM
3

That's because hospitals can't profit off of FGM. The foreskin has 6000 nerves in it and can be used to sell for the fibroblasts it contains. Beauty products put on the skin made out of cells extracted from foreskin values each foreskin at 100k$. If creating beauty products from human flesh was rendered illegal, then circumcision rates would plummet.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:51 PM
2

If doctors can oppose circumcision, then doesn't that raise a red flag? Someone who can profit heavily off of neonatal circumcision is opposing it. These doctors opposing circumcision are the good guys that we should be rooting for, instead of doctors forcing circumcision on infants. Wow... that doesn't sound as good, does it?
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:42 PM
3

I brought this issue up in one of my posts, and no one believed me. It's 100% true that SIDS is related to circumcision, and that many babies don't get a chance to live because of it. Circumcision needs to be stopped here and now.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:40 PM
7

There are many reasons for a declining birthrate. Most of them are for unfair reasons and unfair laws heavily leaning towards screwing over men. Divorce settlements are just the tip of the iceberg. If you take a look at most men, half of us are secretly angry about our circumcision and the other half of us hate the direction our country is heading in. Think about it like this, would you rather start a family in manhating America, or move to another country to start a family? A lot of men feel ch…
/r/MensRights14/12/20 08:30 PM
1

You just have to get the last word in. I don't ever remember saying I hated you to start with. I called you an idiot because quite frankly, you're speaking out without knowing anything. You maliciously say I'm crazy and argue that I'm making up foreskin facials when they are 100% real. I do not like the fact that my body was permanently changed without my permission, it has nothing to do about myself. I'd like to see anyone needlessly mutilated with a BOTCHED circumcision be happy with the fact …
/r/MensRights12/12/20 12:14 AM
1

I never said I was Jewish. Are you confused? You make a post like this just to show us exactly why we hate society. Stupid men really do doom the rest of us. Go let them cut your foreskin off, and then you'll see why Americans are so hateful. Claiming insanity over a post is hilarious, especially when you can't handle the truth. You can't deny that foreskin facials are fucking real. Oprah talked about getting them publicly and you can buy them. How is that legal? Flesh trade is illegal in Americ…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 09:24 PM
0

Oh my lord. Go and look it up you moron. Foreskin facials are a REAL thing. Look it up!
/r/MensRights11/12/20 03:23 PM
1

No, you're calling someone out over an issue you've never experienced, you moron. You're being insensitive on a major issue for men, just because it hasn't happened to you. Murder can affect others not murdered. Their families, their friends, and their communities can all be affected. Circumcision can also affect all of those things. Your relationship with society, your parents, and even your own country. Men get frustrated and angry having no consent on whether they can cut off and harvest your…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:39 PM
4

My argument is when people say circumcision isn't as bad as FGM and can't be classified as mutilation. This is misinformation. If your entire clit gets cut off, you're just as fucked as a man that had his entire dick cut off. Even with just the cockhead cut off, you're looking at permanent disfigurement and lack of penetration ability as well as ED. They both need to be treated the same. One has a higher rate because it's intentional. When I say FGM, I'm talking about the removal of both the cli…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:20 PM
1

Perhaps I should self-publish a book called, The Wrath of Toxic Feminism and Its Effects on American Society. I'll include the fact that they don't regard male circumcision as mutilation, even when it can be. If a doctor cuts of or burns off your penis, then odds are you're shit out of luck and will never regain function. In the case of a bad botch, there is only one real difference between FGM and MGM, that being one is accidental and one is intentional in some places. In some parts of the worl…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 08:07 PM
6

Oh? How about when the male circumcision is botched and they burn or cut off his entire penis? That's the same as FGM mutilation. Just because one of them is intentional in some parts of the world and one is an accident doesn't make a difference. Would you like to be that one boy out a hundred that had his penis cut off, and remade out of other bodily flesh? I didn't think so.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 07:54 PM
1

If you haven't been circumcised, then you don't have any right to say anything about this. Many men have suffered greatly because of circumcision. You don't know about the cosmetic, nerve, botched damage caused by circumcision. Just read up the possible complications and you'll wish you hadn't.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:18 PM
3

I agree with all points. People like to blame Jews for circumcision, but they forget that most Jews don't even get pain relief, or even consent to circumcision. The psychological damage is permanent after something like that. As a baby, a Jew is no less able to prevent a circumcision than any other baby. The damage caused by circumcision is almost entirely the reason why I can't forgive America, hospitals, or doctors. At first, I also hated Jews, but after talking to some, and hearing that even …
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:14 PM
3

Some doctors don't use pain relief on purpose, because it's risky to use in babies. They obviously don't allow the parents to be present, so they can't make sure their baby isn't suffering. He could lie and tell them he numbed their baby and they'd be none the wiser. They're fucking sadists. Imagine someone slowly prying apart your sensitive flesh, before slicing through or crushing it. To make matters worse, you have no idea why, so you associate your genitals with pain. This leads to masochist…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 05:24 PM
2

Oh God, wax strips don't work on the penis. I tried that once and I actually tore my dick apart. It took me weeks to heal back up. I also tried tweezing the hairs but it really and I mean REALLY hurts and they always grow back anyway. I thought if I tweezed them enough then they would stop growing, so I tweezed them eight freaking times in agony, only for them to grow back, or cause ingrown hairs that hurt a lot. Hair removal on the penis is extremely difficult since lasers used to remove hairs …
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:52 PM
2

I do dislike how they make female-only colleges, scholarships as well as race-only colleges and scholarships. The young white men have never been as bad off in America as they are today. Older people don't understand the difficulties young men face with discrimination in the workforce and colleges. It shouldn't matter if you're black, white, red, yellow, etc. Scholarships should be given out based on performance and effort, and college applications should be about the same. White men are incredi…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:51 AM
4

I see what you're saying, but there's a point where you have to realize that it's a lost cause. Feminism has already gotten its roots into most young women, especially young college-aged women. Manhating has become the norm in America, partly because the news fans the flame. At a certain point, all you can do is leave it all behind and look for a better life, or roll around kicking and screaming while being silenced by the same society you work like a dog for. America hates its men, and that won…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:47 AM
2

I just wonder why you don't expect society to care about men? How can men and women ever be equal if men are deemed less vital to society than women? That's so fucked up. Men need to stop sitting back and letting this crap happen. At some point, we have to stand up and say enough is enough.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:02 AM
3

It really depends on what you want out of a society. America is cold towards men, it has one of the highest suicide rates among young white and middle-aged men in the world, and the economy hasn't been anywhere near good since the housing market crash back in 2006. Other countries have other problems, including Australia. So, are the countries you mentioned really better than others? You can think your country is superior, but until you live somewhere else you won't know for sure. Hell, take a v…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:57 AM
5

There are some things that can be tolerated. Manhating is not one of those things. If you screw over young men with new bullcrap laws that defy all logical sense, then you don't deserve to have men participating in your economy. If we are so replaceable, then fucking replace us, and do it all yourselves. We're mutilated at birth in mass with circumcision so that hospitals can profit, we're talked down on the news for being male, and we're literally fucked and used any way possible. At a certain …
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:37 AM
2

The rate that women were imprisoned doesn't even matter. Men are imprisoned far more often, so a 45% increase is a HELL of a lot bigger for men than a 50% increase is for women. I've also heard about you feminists wanting to let murdering psychopaths out of prison if they are women. God have mercy on us all.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:28 AM
1

Just go to another country. America isn't much better off though. Most Asian countries still value men, and some European countries also still value men and give equal rights. Any country that fourth-wave feminism has hit, you don't want to be in. Men have next to no rights in America. If a man is drugged and raped by a woman, he still has to pay child support. No reproductive rights, no basic rights or protections, and biases against men for college applications. Women can lie about rape and fa…
/r/MensRights10/12/20 12:26 AM
3

Who knows? There's more to relationships than sex, but that is a major part of it. Besides my obvious cosmetic deficiency, my sensitivity is far lower than any other guy I know. I once had a woman finish before me and complain bitterly when I kept going, so I had to fake it. It was... really really uncomfortable for me. The last thing a man wants to hear from a woman he is making love to is, "Finish or pull it out already, because I finished ten minutes ago!"
/r/MensRights09/12/20 11:46 PM
3

Don't worry, I really don't mind. Feel free to throw out facts. I appreciate your dedication to the cause.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:04 PM
2

Yes. Male circumcision can ruin a good number of men sexually, but female circumcision can actually intentionally completely remove the clit depending on where you live. So... female circumcision can have a 100% botched rate depending on where you live. Although, even if a good portion of men come out of circumcision okay, what about those who don't quite get so lucky? It needs to be banned for sure. In the worst case scenario of a complete severing of the penis, it equates to the same as female…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 06:59 PM
3

I'm just telling you what they claim. I don't believe circumcision helps either, as dry skin and cracking can result in higher infection rates. Having to shave the hair off of your dick before a sexual act, also massively increases infection rates.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 06:27 PM
2

It's actually much higher than 100 boys. Again, they conceal their own data. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has a massive increase in babies who were circumcised. Either due to improper form, unseeable internal bleeding, infection, no pain relief, and shock during circumcision, etc. They don't count SIDS because they say it's untraceable to know what caused it. The amount of stress caused when the doctor doesn't properly numb the penis can be extraordinary and is why many babies refuse to breastfe…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:20 PM
3

They like to talk about the lowered risk for HIV because of circumcision, but if you're using a goddamn condom, then it doesn't even matter if you're a lot less likely to contract HIV. Therefore, there are no benefits to circumcision for people with access to condoms, and there can only be negatives that come from it.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:19 PM
3

This is a very hard question to answer because it's highly variable, but I'll try my best. First off, cosmetic damage. Yes, it's true that an uncircumcised man can have a couple of hairs on his foreskin, but they are usually thin. A circumcised dick that has had too much shaft skin taken off can result in the scrotum being pulled onto the cock, to compensate for a lack of adequate shaft skin, for an erection. You can tell by where the midline of your scrotum ends when erect. Does it get pulled o…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:13 PM
7

It's really all you can do in that situation. I bet you had no idea that circumcision could turn out so rotten, or you'd never have had it done in the first place. That's how doctors and hospitals trick their father's into allowing circumcision. "Well, you want your son to be cut like you, right?" It's so maliciously targeted at dads that apose circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 01:49 AM
3

The same thing happens to me sometimes. The title was meant to show just how ridiculous bragging about a 1% botched rate for circumcision is. Like... it should be a 0% botched rate since it's an unnecessary operation, to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 12:30 AM
9

It really ruined me for life. Of course, I moved on past it, but I never fully recovered. Yes, I prefer to be alone most of the time now. I tend to avoid gyms or anywhere else where I have to dress in a lockerroom, and if I do go to a gym, I make sure to dress in the bathroom stalls. I had horrible depression during college and ended up dropping out after I figured out about this. It's extremely difficult to repeatedly shave my dick every time a woman shows interest for a one night stand, and I …
/r/MensRights08/12/20 09:57 PM
11

I figured it out in the lockerroom at school, at about thirteen years old. I kept getting laughs when changing, so I thought my penis was little or something. Later, at around 25 years old, I figured out they were laughing because of the thick black hairs going up to my circumcision scar. Needless to say, this fucking traumatized me when I realized it wasn't because I was hairy naturally, but that they ruined me at birth. They even started calling me, Chewbacca and the girls that liked me sudden…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:52 PM
14

I'd believe it. There are a lot of botched things that they don't consider botched, and that skews the actual rate in their favor. Too much skin taken off? It's not botched, it's just a tight circumcision. Cockhead completely severed? Okay... can't talk my way out of this one. I botched it.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:45 PM
7

It's like DnD, only a bad dice roll handicaps your sexual pleasure and intimacy with partners for life. Technically, we all rolled the dice, as babies. Unfortunately, one in every hundred babies fails the saving throw roll. Oh well, it's just one baby, right? Who cares? I made my money. Lol.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:39 PM
6

What really bothers me is that they never explain the consequences of a botched circumcision to the mother. My mother doesn't even know what circumcision is, or why I'm angry, and I'm not explaining it to her. It's not even her fault she was talked into circumcising me. A young mother doesn't know what to look for unless his cockhead just falls off one day.
/r/MensRights08/12/20 08:37 PM
2

This makes perfect sense... if you're a feminist meth addict on your 5th week of no sleep. Men alive right now never oppressed women to start with, so why should women get to oppress us? Women gained the right to vote long before I was born. Ever since then, feminism has been about taking rights away from men and giving women special privileges. This is similar to saying that black people should enslave white people because white people enslaved them first. Wait... I never owned a goddamn slave!…
/r/MensRights08/12/20 06:42 PM
3

No one cares about men. That's something that most people can't seem to get through their heads. This post won't change that, nor will the other 500 posts saying the same inequality between men and women. America is full of manhaters, and can't be saved at this point. Why are boys mutiliated at birth, but women are spared cosmetic procedures to their genitals? Why can women sell their bodies online and make more than an honest working man with a college degree? Why do men never get any kind of h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/20 02:00 PM
1

How does that make any sense? I would have rather lived back in ancient times. Modern civilization is the pit of Hell itself. Men's rights have never been weaker than they are now. Yes in the past women were given special treatment, but it was the right thing to do, at the time. Men showed them respect, even though men held most of the power. They could afford to be kind. Men nowadays are powerless sad sorry excuses for men, because we've been absolutely repressed. Look at what women do now that…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:15 PM
2

Thanks for listening. Good to know I'm not completely alone.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:52 PM
2

I've been painstakingly learning Japanese. Not because I'm a weeb, and believe Japan is the almighty country, but because if they can basically do hentai anime over there without drawbacks, the women definitely aren't feminists. In America feminists would shut that shit down fast. Ireland my relatives actually came from, and I can trace my heritage back to a town named after my last name, Clifton. I thought about going back there a lot, but I know very little about it. How is toxic feminism ther…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:40 PM
6

Unfortunately, I think you may be correct. Soon enough America is going to buckle under its own financial strain. Life is too short to be fighting an endless war that we probably can't win. I want to move to Japan because I think men there are still respected.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:22 PM
4

I can totally agree with most of this, but this is definitely our war. No less than our very manhood hangs in the balance. If we don't fight back against the clutches of Feminism, it will invade our women, and grab us by the balls. I think our biggest problem is we need masses of men to put their foot down and stop those disgusting sadistic harpies from ruining us. Ostracize them from communities, and send them packing. The American economy would once again flourish, as more men begin to reinteg…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:14 PM
3

Well, your reasoning is also flawed. You are guessing that it may have been even worse without the MR movement, but that's all it is a guess. The men's rights movement has failed us. Feminism is winning over the majority of people, and men are too afraid to stand up for themselves. If they do stand up for themselves feminists call it toxic masculinity. It's a lose-lose situation for men's rights. Equal rights between sexes are impossible to achieve with the current American mindset. Feminists ar…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:04 PM
3

Your guess is as good as mine. I think she believes everything she sees on the news, but God forbid I ask her about that, and set her off on another ear rape tangent about toxic masculinity. It's rather annoying, but sometimes I think she is going senile, and just making shit up. It's completely illogical for her to hate Trump when he has done some good things already.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 07:58 PM
5

I'm voting for Trump this election as well. My aunt is a feminist cunt, and I have to listen to her rant and rave, because she is too old to live alone, and I decided I would help her out. She hates on Trump 24/7, so I asked why she hates him. Here is her explanation. "I don't like what he did to his ex-wife. He was really mean to her!" For God's sake! She isn't marrying the guy, he is just running the country! Why does that even fucking matter? The fuck!? Feminist logic is so fucking disgusting…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 02:56 PM
7

I'm not so sure about that. Changing an entire country's social standards is nearly impossible, but I appreciate the optimism you have. Things will get worse for men, and eventually, men will have enough of it. Unfortunately, the worse for men in America is still to come.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:54 AM
1

Because God doesn't exist. He was made up by the humans that made up that far fetched garbage. Christianity is meant to control the population, and that's why many younger people are atheist. If you want anything done, then you have to do it yourself. Find a woman that isn't a feminist. It might be hard, but so is most other things in life. Live by your own morales, make your own judgements, and never look back.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 07:42 PM
1

None taken, although few other places actually respect men still. America is dead, Europe is dead, and arabs would just kill us if we went there, and they treat their women like shit... Not a lot of options.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 08:50 PM
1

Just know you aren't the only man that feels this way. America is becoming far too feminist for it's own good. As soon as the Corona virus calms down I'm moving to Japan.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 10:44 AM
1

Get a job that you create yourself. I'm a 26-year-old book author, and I make far more cash than I ever did working anywhere else. Not only do I make more cash, but I can live wherever I want, and won't have to worry about finding a job since I can write from anywhere in the world. I suggest you move to another country that still respects men, (China, or Japan in particular.) However, wait for the Corona Virus to calm down first. You can't change society, because they don't listen to men, so the…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:02 PM
0

You would be right, if a woman that calls herself a feminist, wasn't a manhater. Women that are for women's rights, almost never identify as a feminist anymore. Why is that? Maybe because they don't needlessly hate men, and can't agree with other feminist extremist's views. People like you are the actual ones hurting men's rights. Anyone that thinks feminism is still about women's rights is absolutely wrong. It's obvious it's about giving women all the benefits, and punishing men for acting like…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:10 PM
0

We give feminists too much attention. Ignore the psychotic little cunts, and give all your attention to real women. Eventually feminist will see that they are no longer welcome. If every man in America committed to this, we would have already won by now. Don't give the feminists children, don't give the feminists attention, and they will eventually self destruct. If they don't have children they cannot engrave manhating into their children.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 12:28 PM
1

I'm not afraid of being an outsider. I don't care about stuff like that. Just because I was born in this Godforsaken country doesn't mean I belong to it.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 05:47 PM
0

Idk I feel like bringing attention to feminists is exactly what they want. Instead we should be focusing on men's rights exclusively, or lack there of. I'm still contemplating leaving the US, and renouncing my citizenship. America just has far too many problems to fix at this point.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 10:43 PM
2

I'm in the middle of the ocean, all alone, and without a life raft. Please turn the boat around. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 06:36 PM
10

Why does circumcision even need to be done? It doesn't lower HIV rates, it definitely lowers penile sensitivity, and it can lead to severe problems, such as total gland amputation, and buried penis. Not only is buried penis painful, it makes getting erections a challenge, and eventually leads to hair being pulled up onto the shaft, thanks to the scrotal tissue being used by the body to expand tissue, thanks to insufficient penile tissue. When people look at circumcision they see it as what the d…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:40 PM
1

Someone on this reddit replied to an earlier post of mine. I was wanting to commit suicide because I was circumcised, and he said something that actually makes sense. If you kill yourself, that's it, the people that made you suffer win in the end, and you hurt anyone who still cared about you. Instead put your energy into fighting for men's rights, so that other men don't suffer like you are right now. Our problems may be different, but they both hold the same idea. Men, get screwed over by toda…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:30 PM
2

Well feminists arguments are ridiculous, to say the least. Still though feminists are a cancer that needs to be cut away. If we ignore feminist women they will self destruct eventually. America sucks no matter how you view it. The feminist movement has crippled many men.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 12:42 PM
0

What is this feminatzi shit? So according to you, sexual mutilation is okay since you think it makes the penis more pleasing to look at? Circumcised, or not women will still think our cocks look nasty either way. This is why women aren't getting anywhere today. Man haters claiming to be feminists, but are actually fucking cockroaches. Your argument: Anything a woman does is right, and everything a man does is wrong. My argument: Crazy feminatiz man haters should be sprayed with roach killer. Wom…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 03:08 PM
3

I signed it.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 01:37 PM
5

The funny thing is, blood loss from circumcision can cause down syndrome, because of damage to the brain. Babies can actually bleed to death incredibly quickly, especially a newborn. The American doctors that promote it are so damn twisted.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:50 AM
1

I had no idea Europe also had feminatzis as well, Japan or China it is then.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:36 AM
2

I'm not sure how people can calculate how much heroin a country uses, but you may be on to something.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:31 AM
7

Dirty needles my ass! Europeans have similar medical conditions, as both America, and Europe are first world countries. Not sure who fed you that crock of shit. The tearing from friction is a good point though, but that would also mean I'm right that circumcision DOESN'T protect against HIV, and STDs. The best defense against them is a condom plain and simple. This is a countrywide comparison, but Europe has more people than America, and still four times less HIV on average. Now that's saying so…
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:30 PM
5

They can't do that because then they wouldn't be able to keep their illegal infant foreskin flesh trade going. Sick fucks know most men would say, "Fuck no, you aren't cutting anything off my dick!" That's why they promote circumcision when you can't say no. Sick fucking pigs need to be tortured to death sexually.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:17 PM
9

No I went to a sexual assault lawyer, and infant circumcision, even with parents permission, can still be seen as sexual assault later in life. Circumcised men are much more likely to suffer similar feelings as having been sexually assaulted which leads to depression, and social withdrawal.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:14 PM
5

Foregen can theoretically recover what we lost. The more cash they have the faster research will go, but they could always fail. If they succeed though it will be amazing for men like us.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:09 PM
3

It's nice to see the tides finally turning. I've made many posts about this, and although it's hard to accept we were used to keep illegal flesh trading stocked up, this needs to be widespread knowledge. Us men can stop this, and perhaps even recover what we lost, but we have to get angry, and use that hate to fuel the rebellion. Fun fact of the day, Americans are four times more likely than European countries to contract HIV, sometime in their lives. Circumcisions best benefit, isn't an actual …
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:04 PM
1

And yet American men are more prone to psychosis, and aids. Hiv rates in America 4 times higher than most European countries, and yet they still claim circumcision makes you less likely to contract Hiv. The real kicker is it actually makes you 4 times more likely to contract Hiv! Depression rates in America are far higher than Europe's rates as well. The one big difference between us is circumcision. Put two and two together you moron.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:38 PM
1

I've already donated a good amount. I hope men like you get denied access to foreskin restoring surgery after, so you can remain damaged. It's because of men like you that we haven't gotten anywhere. Seriously you spout a bunch of bullshit when Foregen is the only company trying to fix the damage circumcision causes. The stigma in America doesn't help with that, but honestly men like you aren't needed. You are useless to the cause because you are past the point of accepting reason. Enough men ag…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 07:13 PM
1

There are many studies that go over such things, but in America you cannot compare these things. Hospitals say it is immoral to circumcise, and study the changes to the brain afterwards. I can't list every single one of them because I casually read through countless amounts of them. If you want that google it, and you will find many reviewed works besides America's. Believe the lies if you want, because I doubt you can handle the truth.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 07:11 PM
0

No, but that's also because of high prices, and financial strain. There are many factors that effect things, but circumcision is among one of them.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 07:05 PM
1

No I get that man, but the good fight is about more than money. Try to spread anticircumcision to everyone you know. If every man did this we would already have won, and gotten it banned. Men have to speak up about this issue in masses for anything to be done about it. America is taught to ignore men's feelings, but then they tell us we don't feel enough, and that we are toxic. Well which one do they really want?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:23 PM
0

Well I apologize then, but I thought it was common sense to compare developed countries to developed ones. I'll change it in title.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:15 PM
1

I'll list a couple below. https://www.google.com/amp/s/stopmalesuicide.com/2016/09/14/male-circumcision-and-male-suicide-is-there-a-link/amp/ https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/psychological-impact/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7986418/
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:11 PM
1

It's more about developed countries. You can't compare third world countries to America it just doesn't work. Like the guy who said Africa has higher HIV rates than America, yes it's true, but America is far more developed, and is falling behind countries like Europe. Either Europe is just better at STD prevention, or being circumcised makes you more likely to get HIV.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:48 PM
0

Compared to Africa!? Are you an idiot? America isn't even close to a third world country, yet out of all the developed ones uncirced vs circed America has the highest rates of HIV when they even say being circumcised protects against it. So if it protects against it then why does Europe which is mostly uncircumcised have less HIV?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:44 PM
5

Well all it takes is for you to look at other countries, about whether, or not they think routine circumcision is a good thing. NOT EVEN AMERICA RECOMMENDS CIRCUMCISION OF INFANTS ROUTINELY. If I have any agenda, it's to stop this barbaric practice, and get full recovery from it through Foregen's work myself. I will do anything to make sure they succeed, and that America pays. If they didn't mass circumcise in the first place we wouldn't even be having this conversation right now.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:14 AM
4

The circumcised ones. Dude America is in a sexual recession right now, partly due to extremist feminists spreading fear upon men, but also because we just can't handle the fact that circumcision may cause damage. What about guys like me that are fucked for life? Also fun fact, America is a mostly circumcised country, but has the highest HIV rates. If circumcision prevents STDs then how does that statistic make sense? Numbers don't lie. Now this is only comparing America, a developed country to o…
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:39 AM
2

The tides are already turning, and my posts about this issue had many feminists that agree. Now if you are talking about those sadistic apes that claim to be a feminist, but are actually man haters, then no they don't, and they will never care about a man's problems.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 12:07 AM
2

Good god your name says it all. Islamic are a circumcision culture, you are brainwashed. It causes damage and aggression later in life because it damages important parts of the brain that deal with emotion.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:46 PM
5

I'm glad to see anti-circumcision is gathering steam. They've damaged us, and don't want to admit it. The jokes on them though, men will find a way to make them pay, whether by a massive class action lawsuit, or dropping out of the American workforce/moving to another country. A lot of men have already been dropping out of the workforce already, so we are part of the way there. Down with genital mutilation, and sexual assault against infants! My body, my choice!
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:39 PM
0

Naw running away will screw the feminist over more. If all the young men fled to Europe then not only would feminists be fucked, but the entire country. This country sucks anyway. Wish I was born in Europe, and not mutilated by circumcision as an infant.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:29 PM
-4

If women really want to help men, which would also positively affect them, then they have to help us get infant circumcision banned in America. They also need to help fund Foregen so they can fix our damaged penis. Maybe then men would be far more polite, instead of angry at the country. I know I dislike women more because I was mutilated as a child.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 10:41 PM
5

Well I've had a discussion with other people on here about feminist control over the western world, and have decided the best way to fuck them over is to simply leave America behind, and ignore the feminist. If enough young men move to Europe it won't only be feminist hurting, but the entire goddamn country. Also China did that 1 child act which made them kill off women, and keep the boys. They are the only country in the world that has a lot more men than women. Because of this, women have near…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:31 PM
1

If that is actually true then why live in America at all? There are some European countries that speak English. The women over there aren't batshit crazy feminist. Men could simply leave the country if they find it unfair, and unlikable, and women couldn't stop us. Hopefully they will turn America into a women only country, and go extinct. They need us to repopulate. Without men it's over for women, and it's already happening in America. You already see many feminist women walking up to you when…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:06 PM
1

That's very few extremist feminist opinions, and even then men could just leave America to avoid castration, and many men have fought and died for much less than their own manhood. Feminist would be hunted if they ever tried to actually enforce castration. Fight fire with fire. If feminists want to attack men, then it's about time men start ignoring, shaming, or hitting back. Women are weak creatures psychologically, and can't stand up to repeated mental assault. If I wanted I could destroy a wo…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 04:16 AM
2

If enough men throw a fit, then feminist woman can't do shit. It doesn't even effect them, they aren't the ones being routinely mutilated. This is why women are starting to get ignored by men. This is why women get no respect. If they dislike men so much, the why don't they go make a lesbian community, and fuck themselves? :) If feminist women had as much power as you seem to think they do then all infants would be castrated at birth. Then our race would go extinct, the end. Lol!
/r/MensRights28/12/19 03:24 AM
3

The first thing the feminist women will do when they take control, is make castration mandatory on infants. Then later in life when they wanna have kids, they will notice they fucked up big time. Then the human race goes extinct, the end.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:34 PM
1

There are plenty of studies on the internet, but in America itself hospitals say its unethical to monitor a newborns brain before and after circumcision. I will post you a link. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage%3famp https://circumcision.org/circumcision-permanently-alters-the-brain/ These are just two of few studies.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:05 PM
4

How so? I'm not here to argue, but I think your defeatist attitude sucks. Thank God all men don't think like you do.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:57 PM
5

Im 26, but only just figured out about it. I can still sue, and I've already had my case taken by a sexual assault lawyer. The damage is so evident that he thinks I'll win, but doesn't every lawyer say that? Now what will I do if I win the case? Donate some to Foregen, and pray they can fix me. There is no other way to be intact again, right now. Literally nothing they can do.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:53 PM
7

I'd like to see these feminist dirtbags grow testicles. "Oh guys spread there legs wider than girls, because it's uncomfortable to have their nuts crushed? I just thought they wanted to intimidate me, lol I'm such a cunt! No wonder no man will dare to sleep with me!"
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:23 PM
6

I don't want to be loved with this damaged thing between my legs. If Foregen succeeds, and I can be whole again, maybe I will learn to love again, but for now I'll stick to solo masturbation. That way I can at least keep some dignity.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:57 PM
7

Something I dislike about the prettier penis thing is, women say a penis looks nasty whether circumcised, or not. They managed to make my dick uglier with thick hairs up to my scar line. I had a woman gasp in surprise because she had never seen a dick before, and she said "Ew!" out loud. Now if that doesn't kill an erection, idk what will.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:29 PM
3

The thing is though most men actually think the same way I do, they just don't feel like they can open up about it. I've talked to many guy friends who think the same thing, I just had to ask them about it. If we tried our best to shove this down their throats they will croak, and pass the bill.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:04 PM
6

You don't seem to get it do you? We aren't giving them a choice. They will ban it if it's what most men want, so fight back, kick and scream, and most of all make sure people know the reason you hurt is circumcision. They would very easily bend a knee, but men have to let the people know that circumcision hurt them. Then maybe women will believe us.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 11:29 AM
8

No, they did not. My mother told me she doesn't even remember consenting. I still can't forgive them for not protecting me though. America has already noticed the negative psychological effects of circumcision, they just don't want to own up to their mistake. They circumcised too many men to admit wrongdoing now. They will pay for it with civil unrest, and the collapse of the social structure. This in turn will damage the economy as more men fall into depression, and become burnouts quitting the…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:09 AM
10

The sensation got better when I did a year of foreskin restoration, it doesn't actually regrow the foreskin, but it does add more penile skin which gives me some slack so my nerves can breathe. The biggest effects for me are psychological ones. The betrayal of my parents, doctors, and my own country, and it wasn't even necessary. That is something that can never be forgiven.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 02:57 AM
11

Unfortunately my penis was damaged by lack of skin. The doctor cut too much off, and I have hair all the way up to my circumcision scar. I've given up on America I think. I want to move to another country, somewhere in Europe far away from this Goddamned place. I'm ruined permanently. I do like that more baby boys aren't being damaged, but it won't help me. For men like me there is very little hope left. Thank you for your concern, but I won't change so easily. This anxiety will stay with me eit…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 02:43 AM
3

I think more men need to fight back against this barbaric practice in America. If we all throw a fit over this they can't stop us from serving sweet justice to the pigs that profit by selling infant foreskins to 3rd parties for 100k$. I just wish more men would support Foregen, they are literally our only hope, but not enough men donate. You can write it off on your taxes, and if all of us donated just 20$, we could have our entire foreskin back in a year or two. Really if most American men unit…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 11:43 PM
6

Some of us just want our penis back the way it should be. Foregen is our only chance for that, but they aren't getting the donations needed to get done quickly. I do however say I am that same man you condemned. I told my parents I hate them because they had me circumcised, and I laughed at my mother as she cried. I've been suffering from chronic stress, and depression because of this. Some nights I can't sleep, and suffer from insomnia. I dumped my girlfriend, quit my job, and became a recluse.…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:54 PM
1

Something I've learned is doctors do not do routine circumcision because it has unbelievable benefits, and no negatives, but because the hospitals are losing billions now that the tide is turning in favor of not being needlessly circumcised. If you look hard enough you will see what I'm talking about has already happened back in 2012, and now only around 50% of boys were circumcised in 2019. Back when I was born the rate was more like 93% circumcised.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 01:12 PM
1

There is credible data if you look around the web... It's different for every man. Some babies aren't even numbed, and this has been proven to cause PTSD, and permanent alterations to the brain that never go back to normal. American hospitals disallow any kind of study into infant circumcision, and mental illness. They know full well what they've done. Cowards! Owe up to it already! Also how dare you try to belittle my pain and suffering from finding out I was mutilated as a child! I bet you don…
/r/MensRights26/12/19 02:25 AM
1

The problem with letting my parents decide at all, is the fact the doctors lie to them, and call it a useless flap of skin. My father was ignorant of any damage caused, but after I talked with him about this, he admitted to having PTSD, and never realizing it. Also I'd rather cut my dick off instead of give hospitals more money to fix something they caused in the first place. That is like a doctor breaking your fingers, and then asking for money to set them, so they don't become deformed.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:16 PM
1

I only started having uncureable anxiety, anger, and depression AFTER finding out what was done to me without my consent. Then after a couple months I progressed into incurable chronic insomnia. I'm angry for being betrayed by America, and this is what caused my mental state to decline. The chronic stress of knowing I will never be intact again, and never feel what it likes to have a real penis gnaws at the back of my mind. If you think my circumcision didn't cause my mental illness, then pray t…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:26 PM
2

The stem cells are extracted from the infant's foreskin, and then they take a needle roller, and roll them into your face. It's supposed to nearly prevent aging of the skin, but it comes at a high cost for men. This is why American men are 4 times more likely to have PTSD, than other countries. The information is there, and thanks to America being a free country, they cannot filter this information out. Instead they run campaigns to lie about the benefits of circumcision, because the moment men …
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:21 PM
3

Idk it's starting to feel hopeless. I think joining blood stained men would only make me more suicidal at this point, but I am trying to restore by stretching what little bit of shaft skin I have left.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:20 PM
3

Don't think of it as a flap of skin, and sexual assault lawyers only charge you if you win the case. If you dont get paid they dont get paid. Foreskins have many uses for our penis, and the biggest one is to protect it when its not in use. Circumcised men can get friction burns on their dick from tight pants, and I've actually had that happen to me once. Most of the studies on if circumcision lowers sensitivity, or not are flawed. They test sensitivity shortly after circumcision, but later the g…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:18 PM
6

I urge you to seek out a sexual assault lawyer. I'm having a branch take my case right now, and he said I have a very good chance of winning.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 03:40 AM
5

She doesn't remember signing anything if she did. She has no reason to lie to me either.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:51 AM
10

I can try. My parents both said they would assist me in a lawsuit because they had no idea about the negatives. My circumcision was botched, and too much skin taken off. This left me cosmetically impaired with shaft hair all the way up to my circumcision scar.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:47 PM
4

I don't think so. How would my parents prove any of this? It all happened over 26 years ago. Sexual assault is hard to prove from circumcision, but if enough men stood up and fought the system, they would have no choice, but to give in, and reimburse all men.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:44 PM
9

The only ones I can sue right now are my parents. My lawyer urged me to do it since the mental damage is so visible, but it's not my parent's at fault, they were lied to, and urged into getting it done. To make matters worse, my mother was still high on natural adrenalin from the pain of giving birth, yet the hospital says she gave them an okay on the circumcision. I asked my mother about it later, and she told me she doesn't remember giving them permission.This is a direct violation of so many …
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:26 PM
9

The only way to sue for most men is through a class action lawsuit. I'm 26 years old, and the statue of limitations on medical malpractice ends at 21 years old in my state. In other words, complete bullshit since I only found out a short while ago, and was none the wiser until it was too damn late. That's exactly what they want. I urge anyone under 21 to sue for circumcision immediately. It is seen as a negative thing even in America. Especially if it harms you in ways you can never fix.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:12 PM
12

It's not penis per say, but the stem cells extracted from the foreskins. That is what makes them so valuable since they have so many nerves. Foreskin Facials torment my mind to no end, and they are 100% a real thing. Such unbelievable savagery for a bit of cash! Doctors are supposed to protect us, not fuck us up for life. I know a class action lawsuit will happen eventually, but now is the time for action! I can't just sit around, and allow other boys to be damaged! Even if I can just open the e…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:59 PM
14

You can find this figure easily online. Companies buy infant foreskins so they can make a foreskin facial blend out of it. Actors pay a fortune to get your foreskin injected into their face. It's horrifyingly disgusting, but to hospitals it's a huge profit. As long as this continues to be true they will keep pressing circumcision on every newborn they can!
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:42 PM
2

Yea sorry, I'm doing this on my phone, and I can't space properly. Believe it or not, I'm actually a published author.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 02:16 PM
1

You can't miss what you never experienced. You fall right where the greedy doctors want you to be. Ignorant, and lacking curiosity. They couldn't profit off mutilation if we got to experiences being intact, and then got circumcised. This country is sick, and I want to leave it asap. I've been told Europe is nice this time of year.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 03:55 AM
2

Skin grafting doesn't work at all. They take flesh from elsewhere and transplant it there. It's not meant to be on your penis, and can't stretch as well as penile skin. Your best chance is restoring manually for years, or foregen coming through.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:26 PM
2

That's a complete lie, woman get more pleasure from uncircumcised men. They are thicker, and the gliding mechanic doesn't dry them out. Circumcised men are proven to make worse love.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 10:51 PM
2

It doesn't actually regrow a foreskin I'm sad to say, as of right now that is impossible. Yes I have tried it to reduce the tightness of my erection, and it worked after nearly a year of doing the exercises. All it does is give you a bit more slack. Even if I managed to have skin pulled over the glands completely it isn't foreskin, it lacks all the parts, it's just flesh. All those nerves and the blood flow aren't coming back.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 05:54 PM
6

I do not hate the Jewish people themselves. I dislike their religion promoting circumcision. There is a big difference between the two.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 05:49 PM
4

You see I don't get this at all. Women have told me my penis is ugly, and I'm circumcised. Now if I was uncircumcised they would still tell me it was ugly. There is no point pushing cosmetics over function of a sexual organ rarely seen.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:34 PM
4

What they told me is in Indiana the statue of limitations only goes to your 21st birthday, and I found this out a couple months ago. So even though my damage is permanent, I can't sue the bastards that deserve it. I'll figure out the name of the doctor that circumcised me, and then give him Hell about it.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:29 PM
2

There isn't much we can do besides help get other men knowledgeable about this issue, and cause enough men to also want their entire foreskin back for them to donate to Foregen's cause. Foregen is only progressing so slowly because of funds, and their research could completely repair your penis back to it's intact state with everything there. That is really our only hope, and if you ask me hospitals should have to pay for their research. You may not believe me but they can sell a foreskin for 10…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:26 PM
2

If my circumcision is too tight, where do you think the skin comes from during puberty? My scrotum tissue was pulled up my shaft because I had inadequate skin to allow any growth or erection. Now I told my mother I felt like my scrotum was getting too tight around my balls, but she just laughed it off as impossible. I doubt you have thick black hairs all the way up to your cock head like I do. It's not very sensitive below the scar line either, often times I don't feel any pleasure below my circ…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:14 PM
1

Yes and it's helped a lot for sensitivity, but i have way too much hair on the shaft to get it off by naturally growing back a little bit of skin. At maximum I might have gained half an inch of girth when flaccid, and probably less than that in length. It's just too slow to see any real benefits, and Foregen says fully restoring may complicate their surgery of actually giving you a real foreskin. My fingers are still crossed for Foregen to succeed, but it's looking less and less likely.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:37 PM
4

Well you are not like most young white men then. Did you know I'm 26 years old and still haven't been married yet? Sure I've had girlfriends but something always happens. My generation is screwed by a bad economy. Marriage and partner rates are lower than they have ever been. So know that although you might have a stable relationship many men don't, and have a harder time masturbating because of circumcision. Also sex with condoms sucks, I barely feel anything, and she gets all the pleasure. Com…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:55 AM
3

Way too expensive, and they haven't ruled out laser hair removal damaging the delicate penile tissue and nerves. Laser hair removal isn't a good option for a lot of reasons. As an added thing, I would be giving more money to the same doctors that caused my problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 03:49 AM
8

Keep in mind lasting longer isn't necessarily better. If you could feel a lot more pleasure with a foreskin, but lasted a little less, wouldn't it be worth it to you, as well as more satisfying? They say circumcised men masturbate more, not because it's easier for them to masturbate, but because they don't feel as satisfied.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:14 AM
10

Read the posts below. My circumcision was botched, and I have hair all the way up my shaft to my cock head. The sad part is I've figured this out, but I can't sue because they say I'm too old, and the statue of limitations have ran out.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:10 AM
5

I've already broken up with my girlfriend. She got angry when I cut myself while shaving, and didn't want to have sex afterwards. (It hurt, and bled a lot. Biggest turn off.) I will do what I can while I'm alive, but some things you just never fully recover from. My circumcision was botched. Unfortunately for me it's too late to love myself. America has made it clear that they don't acknowledge circumcision problems as facts. My penis is ugly bottom line, and I stopped going to the gym because t…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:08 AM
8

If I were you, I would probably stay ignorant as well. You'll be happier that way. I almost wish I never figured this out, but I will continue to fight the good fight. Also I would like to point out I use ignorant as lacking knowledge about circumcision, not that you have low intelligence. It's not meant as an insult.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:03 AM
6

Sad but true. It's not really the people at fault though. The government probably spearheads the lies so that people don't riot. Hell no country in the world has a medical council that promotes routine circumcision as a good thing, not even America! It has more negatives than benefits, and that's if the circumcision was done correctly. If they botched it you're screwed because by the time you realize your penis isn't normal your statue of limitations is up to sue them.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 01:06 AM
10

Tell me then, what functions are taken away when the foreskin is removed? And please do keep in mind if you weren't numbed for the operation the intense physiological damage would be unavoidable. As I've mentioned before not all circumcisions are equal. My doctor didn't even bother to numb me, my time was before they saw these effects. You may not think it's effected you, but it has in ways you just don't understand. I bet you just think they removed a flap of useless skin, but it was far more t…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 12:41 AM
5

Resisting circumcision to get it banned would spare other men from going through this. Unfortunately it is probably too late for me if Foregen can't come through before I'm an old man. Men will only suffer so much before they give up. Maybe our government wants that idk, but they still lie about circumcision benefits. I just feel like the only reason we don't have mass riots in America is ignorance of the negatives of circumcision. Now above all, circumcision doesn't have to nor should it be don…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 12:13 AM
12

No that is an okay thing to ask. All circumcisions are not equal, but circumcision causes long term mental damage if no anastagia is used. Now my circumcision was botched, and I have hair on my penis all the way up to the head of my dick. It's horrifyingly embarassing, and women always ask me to shave which leads me to cut myself by accident while shaving. Now this problem is bigger than me, but the anxiety, the sense of betrayal, and the lack of Americans acknowledging circumcision can be harmf…
/r/MensRights04/12/19 12:06 AM
8

Bad wording on my part, I meant Jewish religion promoting Circumcision, not the Jewish people.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter