TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Leahn Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by Leahn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

It is not sexual harassment since such is defined as "is bullying or coercion of a sexual nature, or the unwelcome or inappropriate promise of rewards in exchange for sexual favors." However, you might want to look into "general harassment", instead.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 11:13 AM
1

I am not a MRA. I am simply a human being that believes awareness to be an obligation. I not speak for the whole group, and my opinion most likely differs from the opinion of most people here. You should not be against chivalry. There is nothing inherently wrong with holding a door open to someone, even if that person is ungrateful about it. The act itself should be your reward, not the other person's recognition. On the other hand, you should not feel obliged to be chivalrous, nor should you bo…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:04 AM
4

I never removed the merit of their experience. Or yours, if that's the case. I am just saying that the woman's reaction in this case is not necessarily an indication that she will attempt to get pregnant against his will. It might be, but not necessarily so.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:53 AM
2

How much is "much more than most women" ? Twice a day? Thrice a day? 10 times a day?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:35 AM
3

I came to say something around the lines you said, so I will just upvote you instead. From the other answers, it seems clear to me that awareness does not equal wisdom. People are judging the girl by the lowest denominator.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:34 AM
3

"Yeah, but you don't count" is not a compliment. As the girl told you herself, "she sometimes wants to be seen as a woman." A lot of women's self-steem is linked to her desireability. I was discussing this with a friend (a female friend) just yesterday that went through a similar situation just last weekend. She had one of her male friends tell her "I see a man on you." I can attest you that it drove her absolutely nuts. While I have no idea why the commenter said that it ingrains mysogynistic t…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:03 AM
1

It is not a genetic disposition. Women are genetically predisposed to seek for safety and security. Something she usually found with a male provider. But now there is the Social Security safety net. A male provider is no longer necessary to provide safety and security to her because the State does so. Hence, a man is no longer needed in her life. Hence, divorces skyrocket. It is not a genetical predisposition. It is a social issue.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:22 AM
2

"There is no such thing as psychics." - Patrick Jane. You can take that to the bank. There is, however, things as very delusional people that believe that whatever they imagine is always some sort of prophecy and your mother is most likely of this kind. If I were to venture a guess, I'd say that your mother is very depressive and has suicidal thoughts herself, whose she projects onto you as "psychic visions". Your mother is actually reaching for your help as a last resort, but she cannot bring h…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:15 AM
1

Women are also genetically predisposed to see men as leaders. It was the Social Security safety net that enabled them to see men as nothing more than utilities, given that they were no longer necessary as leaders.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:57 AM
0

First, let's remove some misconceptions: 1) We are not genetically based predisposed or ingrained to reduce men's well being because of an imagined gender inequality. We simply are not. The only reason we do is because it is beaten into us over and over as soon as we are able to understand spoken words. So, change is rather simple. You stop the brainwashing and nature will return everything to its natural course. 2) What are doing is also simple. We are spreading the word. We find every man that…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:59 AM
1

Statistics are not inevitable. They're just chance.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:04 PM
6

Sincerely? Studies demonstrate that the chance of successful long-term relationship with a women with more than two sexual partners in her lifetime is very low. Not impossible, but unlikely, and the more sexual partners she has, the unlikelier it gets (tops somewhere around 14 partners, if my memory serves). Women call other women sluts to reduce their value in the eyes of prospective mates. Bad mates (that is, guys that only want flings or one time stands) are encouraged by slutty behavior, but…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:39 AM
0

Welcome to the real world. Everything for a woman is about her and how it affects her.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:31 AM
3

Doesn't sound that she wants to marry. She seems to only want a child, and want one now because she is sick and has early menopause. So, she will be infertile soon. She probably thinks she can get a child now, but still get married later normally.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:18 AM
11

No. It is still rape. Just because the guy was good in bed doesn't make it right, or even consensual. No.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:09 AM
0

I have seen ugly men with no money being successful. And I have seen physically attractive men not succeed, as well. But regardless of this fact, you are correct that men are mostly being used by women for their resources in exchange of sex. This is independent of the SMV of them both.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:29 AM
1

Dude, you have far too much to learn. There is like three years worth of data coming into my mind right now and screaming to be written so I can explain to you. It is too much to write down. I will try to be concise and if something is not clear enough, ask me and I will expand. The basics: Men want sexual variety (polygamy). Women want sexual primacy (hypergamy). That is to say that men want to have sex with as many women as he can manage, and women want to have sex with the most desireable man…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:05 PM
7

Basically, something that doesn't even exist yet. A real-life-like sex doll capable of reacting and interacting.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:10 AM
3

You can downvote if you disable custom styles, or you can downvote from the person's submission page (click the person's name).
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:33 AM
2

It is called irony. You should fix your sarcasm detector.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:32 AM
2

Since when do feminists need a solid base to stand on?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:20 AM
1

Because women don't make the cut.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 06:32 PM
-2

Don't be silly. You're allowed to show emotion. I show anger and frustration and impatience all the time. And you're allowed to cry in those situations here. Other than that I suggest punching a sandbag as a more healthy alternative.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 06:18 PM
1

The difference between "blaming the victim" and "giving a safety advice" lies on whoever is the target of the comment. If the target is a PC (protected class), then you are "blaming the victim" because PC people can do no wrong, so there is obviously nothing wrong with the way they acted, and thus it can in no way be improved by your advice.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 06:11 PM
2

Rape law is an actual problem in Sweden. Pretty much everything can be construed as rape there. That's how they managed to get Assange.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:49 PM
0

First, don't call it feminism. Call it egalitarianism, because feminism is none of those things. Second, stop with the idea of wanting to be equal to men, because you are not equal to men. You're a woman. You cannot legislate over nature.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:08 PM
2

Unless she is a troll, she does take her seriously.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:58 PM
3

I posted the correct one.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:51 PM
3

Posting correct link. The one the OP posted is broken.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:51 PM
4

Sweden is actually worse. You forgot the Assange case already?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:48 PM
3

I just read that and I don't think that is an accurate portrayal of feminism as a hate movement. It has: men as guilty of every problem of society women as the only solution to solve such problems men as beings inferior to women and fearful of women because of said inferiority attempts to justify reverse oppression of men by women all thinly disguised in rhetoric, of course.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:52 PM
2

By all means, then, this is from the 20's. Please, read.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:19 PM
6

I understand that grooming requires intent, but society pressuposes intent on men all the time. Isn't that what we're fighting against here? "All men are rapists" ? Society believes that everything we do, we do it because we want sex, so if you touch a girl in the back, and give her money to support her tuition, you're doing it because you want to have sex with her. That's how society view men, and that's why it is grooming. I am not saying that it is actually grooming (that's why I put it betwe…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:54 PM
2

Will it change your opinion if I show you that it is a hate movement since the beginning?
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:42 PM
3

Um, you intentionally deleted the part Yes, he did. It is actually his point. He is saying that this sentence is not his argument. It was thrown together with the argument, but it does not belong to the general idea behind the post itself.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:38 PM
1

Even with the best intentions, doing things like this is an indication of being 'too close' to your students, or being in a relationship with a student that's not entirely wholesome given the position of authority and the age difference. It is called "grooming".
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:32 PM
2

I don't understand how you can make the step from: It cannot be done. There is no valid form of syllogism that accepts the form of III in any figure. It can actually be done if he disputes your second premise and declares that "all discrimination is bad", and swaps the premises, making it a valid syllogism of the form AII-1.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 01:28 PM
0

No, not really. It is always "what woman wants, woman gets".
/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:52 AM
8

I didn't watch the movie. However, I have all three books. There is nothing on the book that qualifies as "hate porn" for Feminists. Lizbeth Salander is as detached from feminism as a woman could be.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:35 PM
2

She would sue for discrimination, probably.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 04:59 PM
3

We're exporting our culture.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 12:16 PM
4

Yes, I know.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 10:24 AM
4

I am aware of the studies. They're in fact part of my argument. one would wonder if those inclined to make false allegations would be more likely to make worse ones if backed into a corner by a penalty. It is a possibility, but those are a minority. It would deter a much greater number of cases. I don't have enough faith in our legal system to not think there are men sitting in prison right now on nothing more than false allegations, possibly with some trumped up circumstantial evidence thrown i…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:44 PM
4

You are talking about someone with a low enough moral threshold to be willing to do this to another human being. Also, I'm thinking women who make false rape claims are both extremely immature and lacking in intellect. Low morals don't make a person bold or brave. Criminals never think they will get caught. You're missing the point. There are no statistics on how many crimes were prevented by such measures because it is not possible to track how many people didn't commit a crime because of them.…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 06:12 PM
7

how do you resolve the child support situation if 50/50 split isn't in the best interests of the child? Default to whoever can care for the child the best. Visitation for the other parent. I think one reason for not having false allegations of rape more harshly punished legally is the risk that once a false claim is made, that woman would be more likely to cling to her story if she faced jail time for recanting. You're missing the point. Threat of punishment would make the woman not even make th…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:51 PM
4

It is a troll. Ignore.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:48 PM
2

Why are we linking to her blog again?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 05:41 PM
7

Why? Because being lazy in Japanese culture is a deadly sin. You're talking about a culture where parents force their children into pursuing nothing less than straight A+ in all their grades and be the very best they can be. So, if you want to shame someone to change their behavior, you associate that behavior to what the society considers the worst possible offense. It is not different from what is done in American society, except that they associate the lack of desire of sex to being immature.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:05 PM
13

She is one.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:56 AM
1

Because they're the ones pursuing political power, lobbying for laws and the like. While the "non-radical" part of the movement is happy with just having an occasional protest.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:53 AM
6

What is funny is that feminism has never been about equality. Not. Ever. Trully, they tell you that it is about equality, but it is simply not true.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:49 AM
4

What are you doing to fight against radical feminism?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:47 AM
1

That counts as trolling, yes, but we're kinda talking about conversations here.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:51 PM
2

Clearly. I need an uncle like yours. Mine are very bland.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 05:38 PM
3

You're right. Your idea is possible. I won't, however, barring any new information about the OP himself, make any assumptions about him.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 04:08 PM
2

Dude, to put it bluntly, I do not think that she is an "awesome" girl if she thinks like this. Consider that those beliefs do not come alone, so if she believes this, what other misandristic beliefs she holds and how much grief can she bring to you because of said beliefs?
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:08 PM
2

That reminds me of a law that passed here on Brazil where I live, where Tire Factories were required to recycle a certain minimal percentage of their production by environmental practices. Except that there is no law saying that one needs to return their car tires back to the factory when they are replaced.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 12:32 PM
4

Not really, no. Plenty of trolled conversations if you talk to anyone less than 30 years old.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 12:30 PM
1

Female advice on females is the least accurate thing that there is.
/r/seduction04/10/11 02:02 PM
11

It is complete and total crap. White Knighting at its worst. Basically, they define realism as misogyny. That is, if we treat women like women instead of putting them in pedestals as if they were princesses, we're sexist.
/r/seduction25/08/11 06:56 PM
1

As long as you agree to it beforehand, it is ok. That's why he is the wingman. He is suposed to be helping you close, isn't it?
/r/seduction19/07/11 12:47 AM
2

Explain?
/r/seduction19/07/11 12:46 AM
1

Don't stare at people's eyes. This is confrontational. That's how animals challenge each other's dominance. It is no wonder people are wondering if you're gonna kill them. However, if you perceive yourself staring at their eyes, blink slowly and break eye-contact imediatedly. Don't smile. It is not necessary. Sure, a good smile you make you seem friendly and sometimes makes your job easier, but it is not necessary. You should display confidence and dominance, not friendliness. See this picture o…
/r/seduction18/07/11 02:44 PM
2

You may have to take a more direct approach and neg him. I suggest that you agree beforehand which one of you is going to close the set before you even approach and open, and you either let him win or he lets you win by being negged by you openly, and not trying to one-up you. It is the proverbial "throw him under the bus".
/r/seduction18/07/11 02:37 PM
5

Avoid negs altogether, unless they're hardcore feminists, then avoid them altogether. Older women tend to be more realistic (life shoves their aging beauty on their faces everyday), so they don't need to be negged as younger women. You should build comfort instead. Compliment her in an indirect way, and make her feel as if she's still as desireable as she was when she was younger. Just don't go overboard and say it directly. Be subtle, use hints, use innuendo, make her unsure if you are really c…
/r/seduction18/07/11 02:33 PM
-1

Make a last minute reschedule, but make her pursue you. Something like calling her half an hour or so before 5, and say "I am at <other place>. Meet me here at 5."
/r/seduction24/05/11 03:06 PM
1

It is the idea that "she is the one". You know... that magical one woman destined by God to you since the dawn of time, and on whose august presence you act like an idiot.
/r/seduction11/05/11 02:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter