TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LedZeppelin1602 Archive

View 69 posts and 903 comments by LedZeppelin1602 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4153

Activism/SupportLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:00 PM
2738

Marriage/ChildrenLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:32 AM
2109

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:40 PM
460

Legal RightsLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:15 PM
450

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:41 AM
338

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:00 PM
278

LedZeppelin1602/r/PussyPass07/10/17 06:10 PM
276

FeminismLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:38 PM
201

Marriage/ChildrenLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:57 PM
186

LedZeppelin1602/r/PussyPass23/08/16 11:43 PM
153

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:19 AM
150

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights04/04/16 12:54 PM
123

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:36 PM
119

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:37 PM
115

GeneralLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:59 PM
111

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:01 PM
94

Activism/SupportLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:48 PM
93

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:22 PM
86

ProgressLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:24 PM
83

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:14 PM
78

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:59 PM
72

LedZeppelin1602/r/PussyPass19/07/16 08:58 PM
67

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:36 PM
67

Edu./Occu.LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:43 PM
66

Edu./Occu.LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:02 AM
65

False AccusationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights01/07/18 11:36 PM
63

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:24 PM
62

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:56 PM
61

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:15 PM
57

False AccusationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:51 PM
57

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:51 PM
52

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:33 PM
50

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:23 PM
45

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:29 PM
42

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:10 PM
38

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights12/07/19 03:47 PM
37

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:01 PM
36

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:04 AM
34

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:21 AM
34

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:20 PM
34

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:07 PM
33

Activism/SupportLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:58 PM
33

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:09 PM
30

ProgressLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:45 PM
30

Activism/SupportLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:41 PM
29

FeminismLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:59 AM
27

IntactivismLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:33 PM
23

Anti-MRMLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:12 AM
22

Activism/SupportLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:32 PM
17

Pay WalledLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:24 PM
17

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:51 PM
17

Legal RightsLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:44 PM
15

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:44 AM
15

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights23/06/16 06:27 PM
15

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:22 PM
13

HealthLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:46 PM
13

Legal RightsLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:34 PM
12

DiscriminationLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:14 PM
12

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:12 PM
11

Edu./Occu.LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:26 AM
9

Social IssuesLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:57 PM
9

LedZeppelin1602/r/PussyPass16/09/16 12:40 AM
8

Fathers/CustodyLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:24 AM
7

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:01 PM
5

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:39 PM
3

GeneralLedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:29 AM
2

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:04 AM
1

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights29/06/19 09:25 PM
0

LedZeppelin1602/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I can somewhat relate in that I’m raising a puppy now at the moment too and there’s a little girl and her mother across the road who loves my pup. My girlfriend handles all the walks and outdoor activity as I’m limited in mobility but when I manage to get out I suppose I’m seen as less-threatening as I’m in a wheelchair. But if I was able to take my pup for walks I think I’d feel the same as you.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:54 PM
1

I totally agree. My position isn’t that they’re comparable in any way other than principle. The principle that one has choice over their body and if masks are made mandatory that choice is removed. So it can be argued that in principle the my body my choice argument can be used in many ways but that it’s only ever used in one way
/r/MensRights22/08/20 09:00 PM
10

Exactly. Her actions are being completely excused by the author of the article.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 11:27 PM
7

I post this because despite him being a sicko as much as her, the way the article is written basically treats the woman as the victim when she chose to abuse a kid. The language talks as if women are weak helpless fragile beings who have no agency or free-will of their own or accountability for their actions. appearing at Maidstone Crown Court, Kent, yesterday, Jewell was told by Judge David Griffith-Jones QC he had indulged in 'breathtaking extremes of depravity' by corrupting and manipulating'…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 11:01 PM
1

The song ‘short dick man’ was popular In the 90s. The activism for fat acceptance only uses women so isn’t fat acceptable but fat women acceptance. The “if you ain’t 6ft swipe left” comments on dating sites The terms fuckboi or fuckboy and womaniser How if a man has sex toys he’s seen as a loser/creep but women are seen as empowered or normal This might be a stretch but in offices women can show skin, even deep cleavage but men are fully covered from toe to neck and even in hot weather are often…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 10:28 PM
2

Women were legally considered “chattel” or property of their husbands legally until the 1990s. In most states you could legally rape your wife until the 1990s because it was assumed she gave consent at marriage. 20-30 years ago isn’t now Most products marketed to women are up charged 30% despite smaller quantities even though they contain the exact ingredients as male products except for scent. Not a disadvantage as they can buy the male products. They have freedom of choice. Women bear the burd…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 10:08 PM
1

I would say sexual violence is the only genuine one left in the west. I’d perhaps add sexual harassment but the definition of that has had the goalposts moved so much that saying ‘your hair looks nice’ to a workmate can be considered sexual harassment so genuine sexual harassment is would include not ‘anything a woman might take offence to’ I wouldn’t Globally I would say rape, child brides, FGM, having to hide their skin and plenty of others
/r/MensRights14/08/20 10:02 PM
1

I’m finding the same with the ‘my body not choice‘, argument. Well the mandatory of wearing masks can be argued to be infringement of ‘my body my choice’ even the consumption of illegal drugs can be argued with ‘my body my choice’ but ironically the only time and place it’s ever applied with is when it’s not their body but their choice
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:56 PM
1

I’ve noticed this with BLM recently. Whiteness is the original sin and ALM is blasphemy and they even have a martyr figure. Religions never declined in the west they just became new religions without us noticing
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:53 PM
1

I ask if that includes their brother, father, son, uncle, nephew, grandfather etc. Or I ignore it so as not to give them the attention they want
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:45 PM
5

My view is that if the radicals don’t represent the majority then a) why are they not called out more often? and more importantly b) why aren’t the “real” feminists stepping in to preserve the ideologies reputation? when it in such tatters and sow few women identify as feminists anymore
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:42 PM
2

I think it’s a mix of women being oppressed by way of being seen as inferior and some points in history and women being held back from being treated as equals for their own protection/wellbeing at other points
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:36 PM
2

One of these days sexism and racism will be redefined in the dictionary using this university-taught SJW version and I’m dreading that day
/r/MensRights09/06/20 09:33 PM
25

The funny thing about J.K Rowling is she bends over backwards to appease the Trans-community while stating biological facts and reality, not realising you can’t do both
/r/MensRights09/06/20 09:29 PM
-1

How can drawing a person be considered speech?
/r/MensRights09/06/20 09:19 PM
2

Well a high-profile case that would’ve raised a lot of awareness about female on male domestic abuse has just vanished so this has put that mens issue back on hold. There’s even been suggestions in the media that the crown Prosecution service shouldn’t move forward on DV cases where the alledged victim withdraws their claim, which is a common thing victims do due to the controlling and conditioning of domestic abuse and that would affect Male and female victims if enough pressure was applied and…
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:42 PM
2

True. I mentioned her only in relation to the timing and how this barely mentions Male victims when a high-profile case of a male victim has just been recently prevalent in the media. And of course how it is worded to focus on women victims and Male perpetrators as usual
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:35 PM
12

Exactly. I doubt very little of the money pledged in the article will help Male victims.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 11:12 PM
13

To clarify I have nothing against women’s aid, well actually I guess I do as I think funding , acknowledgment and support shouldn’t be gender-specific. Member of Parliament for Canterbury, Rosie Duffield, was one of the most significant contributions on domestic abuse in recent years Out of curiousity I researched Rosie Duffield and was saddened to find that she is a feminist who not only is unlikely to be gender-neutral in her campaining for changes to be law in regards to domestic abuse but re…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 11:06 PM
0

No but it’s not that relevant and something more for the angry incel subs not this rational reasonable sub
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:13 PM
4

In that last frame she admits to trolling based on gender. Bet that violates twitters TOS but will of course be ignored if someone reported it on those grounds
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:11 PM
1

And comments are all moderated to not allow mention of the allegations
/r/MensRights16/02/20 09:58 PM
14

All articles about the case had comments blocked. Comments are allowed about this and not a single one mentions the case. It’s being flushed down the memory hole. She’s essentially been declared innocent now and she’s being set up as the victim of online bullying
/r/MensRights15/02/20 08:54 PM
1

What bothers me about the debates around this case is it’s either about the race sentencing gap or police accountability and not about the gender sentencing gap. If this officer was Male he would’ve gotten longer. Not hugely longer but longer
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:21 PM
4

It’s the same with the trans argument. People only care about keeping biological men out of women’s spaces and don’t give a shit about keeping biological women out men’s spaces
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:18 PM
2

Wait they said benevolent sexism. Which is sexism against men in women’s favour. How the hell can they tie that to women hating women?
/r/MensRights03/10/19 07:15 PM
1

I use misandrist and misandry when I see or hear examples of someone hating or being prejudiced toward all men as that’s what it means, like misogyny means hating all women. Sexism, I use for circumstances of generalising all men or being stereotypical of all men or a man but not hating us. Misandry and misogyny are quite rare as to qualify someone has to have not only a sexist attitude toward the entire gender but that attitude has to have hatred or prejudice as well. So for example if someone …
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:29 PM
5

Most of the article is about how it’s mens time to share the burden of contraception to alleviate that for women but there’s one or two bits that are more from men’s perspective and for men’s benefit... “It’s a shame for men that they haven’t been able to take control of fertility, as women have,” says Fitzgerald. She believes the gel signals a step towards gender equality, as “nowadays, men are responsible for their baby, so they need to have control too.” Nic agrees: “I want men to have an opt…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:47 PM
45

I would bet the person that wrote this ad knows full well the prevalence of Male-disposability. The writing is too supportive for them not to be aware that men are seen as not worth saving a lot of the time
/r/MensRights10/09/19 11:00 PM
3

The laughable thing is they talk as if making the first intentionally sexist board game is a good thing
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:45 PM
2

The laughable thing is they talk as if making the first intentionally sexist board game is a good thing
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:45 PM
1

Any parent that would subject their son to these rules is crazy. “Sorry billy, because women overall earn less than men you get less money in this game than your sister because girls rule and boys drool”
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:44 PM
1

It concludes that broadly understanding women’s use of strength, power, coercion, control, and violence, even illegitimate uses, can be framed consistent with feminist goals Translation: Being an abuser is feminist This binary was an essential starting point to defining and responding to domestic violence No it wasn’t it was one-sided and restrictive . This strategy includes bringing male victims of domestic violence within existing services, monitoring exaggerations and misstatements about the …
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:03 PM
2

I will add that unreported sexual assaults are rampant Did he provide any stats for this claim? have been hijacked by reactionaries as a vehicle to push for infringements of women rights. What? How is discussing false rape accusations in anyway to do with taking away women’s rights? This claim here reeks of considering men’s interests as an attack on women’s rights
/r/MensRights04/07/19 09:23 PM
3

Lowering testosterone is concerning.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 05:59 PM
6

Patriarchy is only blamed for the bad of the world. Never credited for the good. It’s a catch-22 they ignore as it doesn’t fit the narrative
/r/MensRights30/06/19 04:01 PM
2

”we all know it’s rare for men to be abused” I wouldn’t call 40% rare but the ones that frequent that sub likely think it’s 0.23% “Statistically there’s too many posts by men for them all to be true” Same could be said of women and rape accusations.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:58 PM
1

Which is exactly why UK MP Jess Philips laughing at the idea men aren’t represented because most MPs are men fails as an argument as the policies and laws and campaigns are almost never for men. I think it’s because of the ‘sisterhood’. They know that women would represent the interests of women first and assume men do the same for men despite the evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:54 PM
1

We just shouldn’t be excluded in the policies and campaigns to help. By having “end violence against women” laws it’s framed as helping only some affected by violence or prioritising those some and ignoring or caring less about the others. It should be “end violence” policies and campaigns but it’s sexist and they just refuse to see it because the idea of helping men equally to helping women is almost perverse to them
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:53 PM
1

Minority men and poor men would still be treated worse than minority women and poor women so by advocating ending the gender sentencing gap you are also helping these groups too
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:48 PM
1

The men and women in power setting policies, campaigns and charities that benefit or are to help women and ignore men or give them significantly less support. Mainstream media conglomerates that push the narrative that human issues are almost exclusively women’s issues Cultural attitudes such as the “women are wonderful affect” and the crazy amount of double standards that treat men harshly and women leniently Feminist influence that prevent the above three from being altered
/r/MensRights30/06/19 03:42 PM
1

A woman was tragicallly London’s 64th murder victim let night and this is what the Mayor decided to put out there ^ I don’t know the numbers but I’d wager that the majority of murder victims that make up these 64 are men, so to say that violence against women has no place in London, while true, by omission indirectly makes a distinction between male and female victims of violent crime and squarely places women’s wellbeing above men’s. Their should be no gendered distinction.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 09:28 PM
3

Because the feminist theory that women are the oppressed and men are the oppressors is endemic in our society. So the idea of helping men is seen as helping the oppressors, and thus as being anti-woman
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:17 PM
3

So their wanting to force him to give his dna for her to use to make a baby against his wishes? Where are the “my body, my choice” people at? The court, though, added it can only hold that the woman has a right to reproduce and is entitled to exercise ... Reproductive right is closely and directly related to women Proof right there that men have no reproductive rights The husband, who is based in Mumbai, had filed for divorce alleging cruelty by her in 2017 So a potential domestic abuse victim i…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:02 PM
3

I would’ve figured they’d be outraged at the woman for suggesting they chose to be lesbians rather than be born that way but I guess demeaning men is higher on the hierarchy
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:57 PM
1

Something tells me if a man had done this to his daughter it would be a worldwide news headline on every major news site
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:03 PM
1

I’d call it the result of toxic identitarianism and extreme ideological derived sexism
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:58 PM
1

I searched this and it’s only coming up on a handful of seemingly far-right news sites. Why aren’t any of the mainstream news sites exploding this story. I see the sun did a report but it glossed over them forcing their son to be trans and basically said they did it because he reminded them of other men
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:49 PM
25

My god this man is insufferable. He keeps saying it’s a difficult question when it’s isnt and keeps trying to avoid answering as if he’s scared of offending by answering or something. And the other guy called Farage racist without offering any evidence
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:33 PM
5

Yeah he media is terrible for the “had a relationship with” framing. And the nerver use the P word in reference to women
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:26 PM
5

Or some woman could’ve made it for a gender studies project about responsibility only being the mans
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:23 PM
10

You can feel the radiating contempt of men from that writer
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:21 PM
1

WTF? Seriously? This is basically saying that a woman’s decision for giving consent is his responsibility. “I truly believe that we have to look at the issue of rape as more than sexual contact without consent,” No. That’s all that rape is.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:08 PM
4

The rational behind this comparison is insane. Forcing men to have surgery that takes away their ability to have children is clearly far worse than denying abortion. The former is forcing something on another and the latter isn't, it's saying "you have to stay on the road you're already on, a road that you (for the majority) put yourself on". How is that in anyway the same as forcing someone into something? This argument kinda presumes pregnancy was forced on women when the vast majority is thro…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:54 PM
1

Whenever PP carries out an abortion they run all manner of tests and procedures all of which are tax-payer funded. So while they didn’t directly fund abortions they fund everything before and after the abortion itself which is essentially the same as funding it
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:31 AM
1

Ideally men and women should have the right to choose not to be forced into parenthood. But if one doesn’t the other shouldn’t either. This Alabama bill takes away women’s choice which ends up with women having the same choice as men; none. Is it fair that women don’t have the choice? No. But neither is it fair that men don’t have the choice. Consistency and removing double standards is the goal imo. But for men in Alabama yesterday the choice was in women’s hands and today it’s in the governmen…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 02:23 AM
2

That’s a good point and opens up a whole other can of worms with the “believe (without evidence) women” crowd. If Alabama kept rape as an exception then any woman could get an abortion by just claiming she was raped. For it to work they’d have to have her provide proof in some form and that would kick a whole ‘nother hornets nest. I’m just guessing here but I bet the lawmakers have the view of “we offered you abortion rights with these restrictions to save the unborn when it's viable, you refuse…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:38 AM
1

Evan Rachel wood picked this up and tweeted it to her hundreds of thousands or millions of followers, and most women are in agreement with her. :(
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:07 PM
1

True, but both of these make up the minority of reasons for a pregnancy so shouldn't be used to adress the majority of pregnancies
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:06 PM
1

Because their not comparable. One is denying an elective surgery to undo ones actions. The other is forcing surgery on someone against their will that takes away their human right to have children when they did nothing, and on children t'boot . The latter is clearly worse
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:03 PM
6

but a woman who was not raped knew that by having sex, she was willfully taking the risk of becoming pregnant. That is often not taken into account though. The discussion is only about the women who were raped or contraception failing or women not having access to contraception or body autonomy, it’s never included women’s choice to have sex knowing the risk or having increased risk unprotected sex as that makes her responsible for getting pregnant and the narrative won’t allow that as it paints…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:23 PM
6

Even if it was all men deciding these things it wouldve been men and women who elected them. So why wouldn’t women be held accountable for electing them?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:16 PM
13

Rihanna posted a picture of only white men in regards to this new law. The comments are as you’d expect
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:15 PM
4

They don’t know the real definition of racism and sexism. They’re going by the SJW are-definition that is it the official one
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:14 PM
1

It’s an appeal to emotion argument. Statistically rapes make up less than 1% of reasons given for having an abortion but they use that tiny minority as if it magically means all pregnancies were forced on women. Also notice that “her body, her choice” is only valid after conception not before. It’s as if all her choices before pregnancy aren’t allowed to factor in
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:08 PM
1

This isn’t only barbaric but it doesn’t logically follow. Denying abortion is leaving a woman’s pregnancy be, it’s NOT performing a procedure on her so nature can take its course. The male equivalent would be denying vasectomies so nature can’t be interfered with Forcing a vasectomy is forcing a procedure on a man. The female wuivalent is forcing sterilisation of women
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:05 PM
30

They act like abortion and children have no affect on men whatsoever. Their so blinded by the HER body, HER choice mantra that men do not exist in their mind
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:58 PM
12

but its believable which is often true of a lot of satire these days. It used to make commentary of extremes but the extremes became common place that it's often hard to distinguish between reality and satire
/r/PussyPass29/04/19 11:45 PM
4

The programme accepted at face value the claim of “parental alienation”, when it is in fact a controversial invention whose “discoverer” has been discredited – see here. None of the women guests or the presenter even mentioned the misogyny and worse of FNF – see here. Why would they mention misogyny when the topic is parental alienation? This sounds like a person who wants that word misused as much as possible These are the kind of professionals we are up against in court and a major reason so m…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:19 PM
3

I bet that account won't be taken down for targeted harassment of a group since Twitter only applies it's rules sometimes to certain views
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:12 PM
2

While the overall message of this video was good I found it to be too focused on intersectionality. It kept trying to make it about sub-groups of men rather than men as a class themselves because I guess saying 'I sympathise with men' wouldn't fly so they had to make it about "protected classes" of which the common average men doesn't fit. It also seemed In my opinion at the end to revert back to talking about rape jokes in general being counter-productive rather than the specificity of male rap…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:07 PM
4

The person bring forth the claim is legally callled the complainant. That’s the word that should be used as it holds no bias
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:42 PM
3

The language also implies all complainants are factual victims by calling them victims not ‘alledged victims’ or ‘complainants’ and calls the acccused ‘attackers’ thus labelling them as guilty
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:41 PM
7

Having a fair trial is sexist to these dissenters. They seem to ignore the reason for this I.e innocent men losing their freedom who wouldn’t have if the claimants phones were examined for evidence
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:39 PM
1

Regardless of comments like this the very existence of MRA is seen as anti-women. I’ve seen us lumped in with alt-right, far-right, white supremacists, racists, misogynists, nationalists and others in articles from mainstream media outlets merely because the narrative is men oppress women therefore helping men is helping the bad guys
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:36 PM
1

Men and women’s bare torsos illicit different reactions though. Overall your message is on point but appearance does have some factor for stranger rape, even if it’s 0.01%. If one dresses in a way to attract attention, male or female, then one will attract attention and the majority of that attention will be from non-rapists but the more attention one garners the more chance they have of catching the attention of a rapist and thus he or she may pick them as their target, this doesn’t make one re…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 03:32 PM
3

The hoops they jump through to absolve women of all responsibility never ceases to amaze
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:39 PM
7

She’s first asked why Circumcision is allowable and people basically just said “because tradition and because cleanliness” then she asked if it should be banned like FGM is then suddenly tradition isn’t an acceptable answer
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:38 PM
2

Thanks for your support. As men we rarely get support, it means a lot
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:32 AM
2

Remember, adoption is a decision that only you can make This right here shows how babies are considered as belonging to the mother more than equally to the mother and father.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 04:27 AM
20

It's the media and industry response that matters In my opinion. The Cardi B story hasn't been taken seriously or ran with and I haven't seen celebs coming out to condemn her but with the others they have. Though the crimes differ in severity a man drugging and robbing women would receive more attention and condemnation than the reverse hence the diubke standard
/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:52 PM
2

All false accusers should face justice, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:15 PM
5

For the second one they do the they do with the wage gap. They take all countries and divide by rights and then imply that all countries are lagging when its mostly eastern countries that don't provide equal rights
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:06 PM
5

Ahh, that explains that one. Thanks
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:43 AM
9

Not true actually. Alita is a movie about a woman and they don’t like it because alita has a love interest and father figure and likes her femininity. They only champion female characters who are more masculine than feminine
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:07 PM
5

By then they have your money. It’s like being served a turd in a restaurant then paying for it
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:06 PM
2

specifically because of strong females characters being in them. That’s not it at all. It’s because of anti-Male sentiment expressed either in the trailers or by the actress. Don’t confuse anti-feminism with anti-women
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:03 PM
2

but every negative thing I've read about this movie have been rants from angry incels who legitimately hate every movie with a female lead or a female with power These “angry incels” (which include women btw) are going in droves to see Alita:Battle Angel because it has no gender politics and is just a good action movie with a female lead
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:01 PM
2

Movies are for everyone though. Brie is basically saying that only women of colour should get to have an opinion about the movie. By her logic she shouldn’t get to have an opinion about movies made for white men. It’s divisive and exclusive
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:00 PM
14

Go see Alita. She’s a great female character
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:58 PM
27

They call them reviews despite it being clear to anyone with a half a brain they are not, as a form of damage control so they can blame he sexist trolls should the movie be received badly
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:57 PM
7

The toxic comments were simply men and women of different races expressing a disinterest in seeing the movie due to the racism and sexism espoused by the lead actress. And yet the ones leaving the comments are called sexists and manbabies
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:55 PM
1

My sister just saw this. She told me of a line that was clearly there to demean men and celebrate women but said that wasn’t the end of it. SPOILERS . . .> villain of the movie is a masculine manly man and it mocks traditional heroism and masculinity in general by saying that being like emmett, more feminine than masculine is best. I wouldn’t mind a message that being like emmett is okay and being masculine is okay too but the message is masculinity is bad
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:01 PM
2

Agreed. Any btw I issued a complaint to the ASA. I doubt they'll do anything but one can only try
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:49 PM
1

I complained to the ASA but they'll probably use that exception OF "challenging negative gender stereotypes" to claim the ad is challenging men's bad behaviour and is therefore allowed. But of course if the ad the ad was "women are deceptive" you know it wouldn't fall under this exception
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:48 PM
1

I'd suggest the advertising standards authority as well and be sure to cite "harmful gender stereotypes" as they have a whole policy about that, though they may excuse this under the exception of 'stereotypes as a means of challenging their negative outcome" I complained but they'll probably use that exception to claim the ad is challenging men's bad behaviour. But if course if the ad the ad was "Islam is dangerous" you know it wouldn't fall under this exception
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:46 PM
2

this one is ridiculous. By this logic if a female graduate of medicine and a female hairdresser show up to a garage to apply as a mechanic then one is qualified
/r/MensRights22/02/19 01:09 PM
2

The advertising company, though I may contact Sheffield police as this is a negative generalised statement against gender which is a protected category so should qualify as hate speech. I hate hate speech but if we must have it then it should be applied equality, after all a poster that read "all Muslims are terrorists" or all blacks are criminals" or all women are liars" would be considered hate speech
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:59 PM
1

I'm Sending a complaint email
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:41 PM
26

“We will place an emphasis on creating a judging space for gender minorities “It is essential to create spaces where gender minorities can find support, meet mentors and peers and feel empowered (by seeing successful women) Proportionally Men are the gender minority though. They're actually saying it's essential for men to have support and meet peers without realising it
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:25 PM
1

Good list but these aren't absolute ability to not pay child support. can put far less effort into dating And outright not privileges at all sports are less competitive and thus easier. Better resistance to groin kicks. less pressure to have a career.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:21 PM
1

gun control is a feminist issue What? Those most shot in America are men, MEN! Yet against only women matter
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:04 PM
1

This persons eyes are opening
/r/MensRights21/02/19 06:00 PM
1

It's this currently up or from the past?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:43 PM
3

They’re trying to social engineer women into doing jobs they want women doing rather than letting women decide themselves what they want. It’s not just discriminatory toward men it’s controlling and manipulation of women’s freedom of choice
/r/MensRights17/01/19 10:01 PM
6

Its locked. Why’s that I wonder
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:37 PM
8

They only want men to express the “correct” emotions which imo are on the feminine spectrum. Look at how Kavannaughs anger and frustration of being called a rapist was used against him as an example of him having the temperament of a rapist. He expressed emotion but ya the wrong emotion so it was used against him. Manbaby! Fragile masculinity! Look who's the triggered snowflake now! Can't handle a razor commercial. Must be an incel! The irony if these are what they call examples of toxic masculi…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 08:41 PM
3

Well I thought about it and I came to this conclusion. I don’t like how women are trying to define what make a man Which she’d find hard to refute given the “you don’t know what it’s like to be a woman so don’t get to have an opinion” and “no ovaries, no opinion, arguments used to silence men from discussions regarding women
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:35 PM
9

Then if you even mention lightly, or question the ad, how you find the ad, one or more of the following, sexist, misandry, insulting, harmful? "What your fragile masculinity can't take it?" You are a manbaby, crybaby, wuss, pussy, woman hater, rape apologist, wife beater, etc. "YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!" There is the 3rd and final coat with the broad brush to shut you the fuck up. The ultimate irony is all of these statements are examples of toxic masculinity, and said by women advocating a…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:33 PM
21

The first three seconds associated sexual harassment and bullying with masculinity, as if only men do these. That alone generalises all men as masculinity and men are intertwined. Further It showed 43 instances of men engaging in undesirable or criminal behaviours to 8 examples of good behaviour therefore it shows men as bad more than it shows men as good and it’s overall message is that all men are accountable for ending bad behaviour when they are decent men and have no relation to the actions…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:55 PM
7

I’d say she was denigrating them as opposed to promoting as all bad behaviours in The ad were done by white men and also tall good behaviours were done by non-white men
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:45 PM
14

The Gillette ad was to show men as bad. This wasn’t to show men as good but show men suffer quietly and take it without complaint which shows that men care more about helping there than themselves
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:23 PM
17

They take it as face value, citing how the ad says that it cares about men as evidence it shows its pro-men. They don’t see how it depicts most men as bad with some good men leading the way to fixing the majority and how that is generalising and sexist
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:13 PM
7

That was great
/r/MensRights17/01/19 05:56 PM
1

To clarify I think that we shouldn't be held accountable or credited with either positive or negative actions of other men. However we are collectively held accountable for the negative and if that is to be the way then we should be credited too with the positive as its bias to only agknowlege the bad that men do and not the good
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:35 PM
22

It's no mystery why all the toxic men in the ad were one particular type of men. Generalising women, POC, LGBTQ, religious people ect is bigotry and not to be tolerated but generalising men, whites and straights is not, that's the doublethink
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:54 AM
2

And the ironic thing is while our culture is teaching boys never to fight, that aggression is never a positive trait, others aren't. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the inevitable outcome from that dichotomy
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:49 AM
325

Men are collectively blamed for the actions of bad men but never collectively praised for the actions of good men. Convenient, that __ Edit: To clarify I think that we shouldn't be held accountable or credited with either positive or negative actions of other men. However we are collectively held accountable for the negative and if that is to be the way then we should be credited too with the positive as its bias to only agknowlege the bad that men do and not the good
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:47 AM
1

This is disgusting, it's collectively holding all men accountable for the few that commit crimes. It generalising all men and maleness as toxic. It's straight up misandry
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:29 PM
1

And do women even want to work in construction? What they want is immaterial. The must do as they're told, because reasons
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:15 PM
2

Good for her for standing up for men and adopter isn't to her principles
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:14 PM
8

Secondly yes suggesting the FBI is biased in a conspiracy against men is flat out retarded (yes the vastly male organisation is out to be biased against men for sure) I just want to point out that this isn't a sound arguement. The justice system is run vastly by males yet they have documented bias against men. Same as family courts, government and media. Just because men mostly run these doesn't mean they run them for the benefit of men. Quite the opposite is usually the case
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:49 PM
3

The rise in Incels and MGTOWS attest to that. Those two aren't the same but both have no patience for women anymore due to feminist man-hating influence in culture
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:37 PM
3

I was going through various gender articles the other day and pretty much all has social constructionism as the base premise with lots of detail about the theories and one part about biology or inherent sex-based behavioural differences and one had a small section with lots of "but this has been criticised as" and "X group has condemned this path of research as..." Basically the sections about gender differences not attributed to social constructionism were short and all points were argued again…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:32 PM
2

I noticed this too. One part was how men's rights is criticised as a blowback by "scholars". And the scholars it links to are feminists, so really it's 'men's rights is criticised as a blowback to feminism by feminists' which is expected
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:26 PM
2

To be a men's rights activist all you need is to care about the welfare of men and want a more equal approach to treating issues as human issues rather than just women's issues
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:22 PM
1

She’s not really. She’s just elderly and old skool and believes everything shes fed. So if true girl in the soap says she was raped then that’s fact to her. It’s the same with the news she doesn’t question validity of claims or think critically of whether or not the broadcaster has bias etc. She’s really a great mom and caring person overall
/r/MensRights30/11/18 03:38 PM
3

I don’t watch t but I was visiting my mum and I tried to say how bias they were being but sadly my mum took any defence of men accused as siding with rapists and said “I was as bad as Martin”, the man who hasn’t declared his friends as guilty because they were accused
/r/MensRights29/11/18 08:40 PM
4

The 'all' isn't even necessary for the statement to encompass all men. 'Men' does that by itself
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:53 PM
1

I don't believe most women would be ok with 1 person suffering unjustly, if that 1 person was a woman. If it's a man, then ok, fuck his life. Bingo
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:32 PM
2

The program, which is also open to mothers who have already lost custody of their children This is odd. What if she lost custody due to being an unfit parent or career criminal?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:25 PM
1

We recognise that if people experience abuse on Twitter, it can jeopardize their ability to express themselves. Research has shown that some groups of people are disproportionately targeted with abuse online. This includes; women, people of color, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual individuals, marginalized and historically underrepresented communities. For those who identity with multiple underrepresented groups, abuse may be more common, more severe in nature and hav…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:19 PM
1

We oppose sexism. We certainly don't have a hatred for women. What she may be mistaking as animosity toward women is anomosity towards feminism which stands in opposition to men receiving equal treatment to women
/r/MensRights27/11/18 11:01 PM
5

When Precopia asked police why he was being arrested, Flores says police told his client, “Don’t act like you don’t know.” “I had no idea who accused me of this; I had no idea why everything was happening,” Precopia told KVUE This is ridiculous. How can they charge him without telling him the place he’s alleged have burglared and the person he’s alleged to have harmed
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:34 PM
2

To be fair I’m not certain but most mainstream corporate media follows the typical narratives so I’d be surprised if it was a positive article in the end but it’s possible. Perhaps I’m a cynic
/r/MensRights20/11/18 08:24 PM
2

protected and cherished She’s literally insane if she thinks this
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:42 PM
1

A good few of the comments were stating that google is bias and care about men’s issues even if not caring about IMD
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:41 PM
1

Criminal men*. Which make up a tiny proportion of overall len
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:28 PM
2

Crowders a traditionalist. He ultimately views men as utilities and women as people. He’s sympathetic to the demonisation and pussification of men but he would want a society where men are solely where society puts the responsibility. He’s a “women and children first” kind of guy at heart
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:25 PM
3

How about we don't tell men how to fix themselves, but instead tell society how to treat men better Exactly. It’s their way of acknowledging men’s issues while not having to change society to fix it whereas with every single women’s issue it’s societies fault and never women’s. Some of men’s issues are down to men and some of women’s issues are down to women but others are a cultural problem or legal discrimination and inequality yet only the ones that affect women have calls for society to chan…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:19 PM
6

All manner of men kill themselves not just macho meatheadds. I’m sick of this toxic masculinity narrative. It’s just a form of victim dismissal. They basically say men are to blame which means that only men need to change and not societies attitudes towards men. It’s a way to acknowledge the problem but not do anything to fix it except tell the suffering group they have to change. I can’t think of a single women’s issue in mainstream media and government and awareness campaigns that is held as w…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:15 PM
8

Women are strong. Women are independent. Women need government subsidies to provide for them. Women are powerful. Women don’t need no man. Guess which one of these doesn’t fit
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:08 PM
2

Women’s issues are ignored zero days out fo the year
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:04 PM
1

I saw an annoying image on Instagram for IMD which said “be a man not a menace”
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:03 PM
645

It infuriates me that they say everyday is men’s day when it’s the opposite that’s the truth. Everyday there’s articles & media discussions about women’s welfare and issues but hardly any for men. Everyday is women’s day yet they have the gall to claim the opposite
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:22 PM
28

Do we not celebrate it 365 days of the year? No, we don’t. On the contrary, throughout the year the media often run articles on how awful men and to blame men for everything wrong in the world
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:20 PM
8

And then inventing new non-issues to fight like manspreading and pushing women into careers they didn’t choose
/r/MensRights19/11/18 05:16 PM
5

Have a great day fellas. You matter
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:25 PM
2

I saw a mumsnet post about his last year. Most commentators acted as if the image detailing men’s issues stated women were to blame when no where did it say that and they then went on to say basically “men are the problem” they didn’t empathise with Male victims because other criminal men were the perpetrators and as such they devalued the victim. It’s not victim blaming but it is victim dismissal
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:24 PM
7

That's the rub. Women's 'Equality" groups only want equality that raises them up to mens higher level never lowers them down to mens lower level or raises men up to women's higher level
/r/MensRights18/11/18 11:38 PM
95

Men are not a homogeneous group, the writer writes as if all men are in positions of dominance and power and don't deserve empathy or support. Pure indoctrination
/r/MensRights18/11/18 11:34 PM
56

And yet the vast majority of characters killed in the game are... Not women.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 11:31 PM
26

So they’re basically saying women can’t compete on a even playing field and men must be held back so women can succeed. Even if we ignore the blatant illegal discrimination against men, the attitude is even sexist toward women’s abilities
/r/MensRights13/11/18 03:36 PM
1

I posted this to the Instagram subreddit and a few suggested to make “women are trash” stickers to make it equal. I stated that more gender-hate isn’t productive but it did make me think if someone did and feminists discovered it then theyd be removed for promoting misogyny and the user named, shamed, and banned all the while they’d never acknowledge that the “men are trash” ones existed first and there was no outrage
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:16 PM
10

If you go in somebody’s dorm room and she touches you, and places your penis in her mouth, she has not conveyed consent." This is like saying "if someone smashes the car window, gets in the car and hot wires it they haven't conveyed intent to steal the car"
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:26 PM
1

He should've replied back... Dear Ms Bokody, You are a bitch and write nothing but filth. Mr Tilton is an empowered MRA and deserves to be on the news app of every man, woman and child. Your stories are dirty and degrading and you should keep them to yourself!
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:14 AM
7

It's the same with how the fat acceptance movement is only for fat women. And the 'you can't be sexist to a man' people. The issues themselves; objectification, body positivity, sexism don't matter on principle, it only matters when applied to women. They aren't against objectification, they're against "objectification of women"
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:39 AM
6

All the MCU solo movies have had a gratuitous topless shot of the hero. Bet Captain Marvel won't
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:34 AM
1

Like everything else with feminism there's no consistency of principle. They only apply the "her body her choice" argument to abortion, literally the only time it affects another life. They don't apply it to women who want to starve themselves, or women who cut themselves, or women who take illegal drugs or women who choose prostitution. Women are pressured not to do these and prevented in some cases yet not a peep about their right to choose what to do with their bodies. Abortion at the heart o…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 01:23 AM
1

You could also argue that a lot of violence against men is initiated by women, and simply never really counted, recorded or recognized as well. I reckon this is quite likely
/r/MensRights16/10/18 03:00 PM
2

I think there are some exceptions where they wouldn't apply the argument to men should they fit a certain minority or "marginalised group" for example they likely wouldn't use the same argument to dismiss black male victims of black perpetrators, they'd blame racism somehow not men, neither would they likely dismiss gay men raped by other gay men as they'd blame homophobia rather than the rapist or if women attacked other women they'd find a way to not blame the woman but perhaps say she was tur…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 07:06 PM
3

And when people rightfully expose that this is bias and it should be "end violence" not "end violence against women and girls" by standing that men experience more violence they just use the "well their attackers are men so" non-argument which doesn't defend the bias of the programs and campaigns to help just women but they act as if it does
/r/MensRights13/10/18 06:59 PM
2

This is the "you go gurl" double standard where women are allowed to objectify men and talk crude but if a guy does it its sexual objectification and chauvinism
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:49 AM
1

I believe the theory has some merit as men should be encouraged to express their emotions but the term is incorrect. For one there's no contrasting toxic femininity to discuss ways women hold women back, secondly it purports that masculine norms and male behaviour prevents men from opening up emotionally but In my opinion men learn not to open up emotionally because society and women don't want to hear it. When men open up emotionally they're seen as less in control by their girlfriends and wive…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:42 AM
5

He wrote this at Quilette... What does “believe women“ mean when it isn’t even clear that an anonymous accuser is a woman? Anyone—male or female—with access to the list could have added my name while it was online. I found this quite interesting. In this case it wouldn't be "believe women" or "believe survivors" as there is no accuser just an accused so surely it isn't about believing women or believing survivors but simply believing men are guilty. Also in a somewhat related, does anyone find i…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:21 AM
1

What does “believe women“ mean when it isn’t even clear that an anonymous accuser is a woman? Anyone—male or female—with access to the list could have added my name while it was online. I found this quite interesting. In this case it wouldn't be "believe women" or "believe survivors" as there is no accuser just an accused so surely it isn't about believing women or believing survivors but simply believing men are guilty. Also in a somewhat related, does anyone find it telling how 'believe women'…
/r/MensRights13/10/18 12:09 AM
5

It's because their narrative is "male perpetrators and female victims" Addressing male victims doesn't do any good for their narrative, but redirecting the focus to a male perpetrator does. So basically "who cares about the man who was attacked? It was a bad man doing it, so see? Men are still the problem" I think that's exactly it. Well articulated
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:33 PM
3

He took it dead seriously. He did not defend his remark, he did not defend men. He sat, hunched and hurt, and he listened Sounds like typical behaviour exhibited by a domestic abuse victim. She's talking about how bad men are while she brow eats her husband, the lack of self-awareness is scary. "You, I said, are one of the good men. You respect women, you believe in women, you like women, you don’t hit women or rape women or in any way abuse women. You have applauded and funded feminism for a ha…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:06 PM
8

So basically if she moves in with and bangs a guy she gets money from the government and after six months gets half his money. Bet they would call it inequality and exploitation if the genders were reversed
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:39 PM
19

I found this out just recently from a YouTube video from TL;DR and was surprised greatly as the narrative is that it's men oppressing women's sexuality
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:30 PM
1

To add to this look at the campaign to get men to call out other men's behaviour which is seen as bad towards women, with most of the examples being overly exaggerated fictional idea of how men talk to each out about women. It's basically a "hey men, you are partly responsible for other men's actions and you must change them or be held equally accountable"
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:29 PM
2

Independence only in the areas you like and not in all aspects isn't independence. They want independence as long as men are there as a safety net for them
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:23 PM
1

I saw this. She treated the white men who didn't sacrifice their safety and risk being sent to court, or worse, for her as more at fault than the man who (I read) harassed or attacked her.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:22 PM
1

Kinda like how progressives claim that white-men men are to blame for everything wrong but credits them with nothing right. I got into a debate where someone posted something crapping on white American men and I pointed out that it was white American men who ended slavery, gave women rights, gave LGBT rights and so forth and their response was that it was white American mean that started skavery and withheld those rights. This is partly true but what they fail to see what that it wa entirely dif…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:20 PM
4

Unfortunately such research isn't PC so isn't repeated very often
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:14 PM
2

Great post. Only thing I would amend would be to change "If a male is sexually assaulted by a woman he will probably not receive justice; the perp will likely get a slap on the wrist even if the victim is a boy." To "If a male is proven to have been sexually assaulted by a woman he will probably not receive justice; the perp will likely get a slap on the wrist even if the victim is a boy."
/r/MensRights12/10/18 10:12 PM
11

I've had discussions with such people, they're mostly moderates but dug in, they're respectful and not emotional wrecks who resort to name-calling and labelling when they can't provide a good argument but In my opinion, they just haven't levelled up to the hating all men part yet. The conversations rarely go anywhere but at least we both remain civil
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:48 PM
12

While I see your point, those two issues are still worthy of focus. The WHY of the thing is important; why do men choose those jobs? I'm not advocating for any legal changes surrounding this choice, merely an exploration of why men choose these jobs. I'm personally more interested in why society doesn't credit or value the men that do these dangerous jobs like it used to. A labourer was never seen as a enlightened or skilful person but he was respected for is hard work at least. Part of the reas…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:46 PM
6

I think the problem is that because we oppose feminism, which is still seen as a good thing by corporate media and government, then we are seen as not about mens issues but about holding women back because sadly feminism has made it that the word feminist and women are almost interchangeable, so if your anti-feminist you must be anti-women, which isn't the truth. Another problem I see that we're seen as blaming feminism for mens issues and I don't believe that's the case. Culture and government …
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:40 PM
2

Green just so doesn't understand that he is advocating for the accusation against him to be considered proof and his "I have never harassed..." Statement means squat with such a system. This is like someone asking a a man for an axe and saying "I want to chop your foot off" and the man saying "here you go, as long as you promise not to cut my foot off"
/r/MensRights12/10/18 09:36 PM
19

I’m all for men making use of paternity leave.. by choice.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 07:25 PM
11

our country is in desperate need of more diverse leaders Why? What proof is there that a “diverse” leader is more efficient, a better leader so to speak? I hate how they all say diversity is needed when what they mean is diversity is wanted
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:50 PM
12

He’s been condemned left and right for showing anger. I’d hardly call that ‘allowed’ Anger makes most people regardless of gender unattractive. And after the Dems have said anger shouldn’t be shown in the senate she’s now saying she wants to bring anger. This is textbook case of slammingnone side don’t something and permitting another
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:46 PM
8

Feminists know how to abuse their female privilege. They know that they can shame demonise and even assault men and most decent men wouldn’t fight back out of a lifetime of conditions not to harm women
/r/MensRights01/10/18 02:28 PM
4

So every woman on these boards will be considered to have been gifted the position (by patriarchy) rather than have earned it fairly. Way to undermine women, feminists
/r/MensRights01/10/18 02:24 PM
-1

You can bet she’ll secure an exclusive televised interview for hundred of thousands of dollars. She’s already gotten a ton of money raised on gofundme. But even without that what if she simply doesn’t want him on the Supreme Court. Making false accusations to Keep him off the bench would be reason enough
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:53 PM
2

They don’t see how ridiculous and dangerous this is. They’re advocating for a system where someone can accuse them and by their own principles they have to believe thremselves a rapist because they have to believe accusers
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:46 PM
0

What annoys me is that not one senator or media pundit has dared suggest the mere possibility that she may be lying. Even those who beleive he’s innocent always take a moment to give a verbal disclaimer that they believe her also. So all of them who beleive him innocent beleive she just confused about the perp and he rape absolutely happened. It should not be out of consideration whether the rape occurred. But it is because they know that should they even slightly imply such they’ll have their l…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:44 PM
1

It saddened me how little concern or love they have for their brothers, fathers, sons, husbands, boyfriends, uncles etc that they’d consider them guilty just because a woman says they are. They just never seem to consider that
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:40 PM
2

I understand protestors being allowed outside, but how were these protestors allowed inside the building & outside the doors of the hearing where they had position to interfere with the hearing as evidenced here
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:23 PM
3

Ignore that boys are raised and taught mostly by women so if we need to “teach Men not to rape” it’s because the mothers and teachers failed to teach them that as boys.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:16 PM
1

Doesn't roll of the tongue as well as "sexual objectification" though. Perhaps "violence objectification" or as you said "mortal objectification"
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:17 AM
1

I'll have a look, thanks
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:15 AM
2

Far more people need to ask this question. Great article
/r/MensRights18/09/18 10:09 PM
1

Sounds like he sexually assaulted her but didn't rape her. At least not by the rape definition that requires penetration. He then went onto marry and have children with her While this is likely just a find that happened by happenstance I'm curious as to whether there's a historian department out somewhere slaving over old letters and memoirs and journals looking for this stuff given the recent trend of looking into the past to find things to besmirch historical figures and tear down there statue…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:54 PM
11

What bothers me greatly about the objectification issue is they almost never mention anything other than sexual objectification because women experience that more than men but men experience objectification more in other ways. For instance take any action movie. The ones being beaten, stabbed, shot, blown up ect are 99% of the time male. Men are universally the disposable moving targets to be maimed and killed because make life is considered cheaper than female life and violence against men is s…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:40 PM
7

That Paedo comment came out of nowhere. As for the issue Brie Larson is vocal feminist but I'm not sure if she's the sex-positive type who would want a topless scene, not to be equally objectified mind you but for female empowerment or if she's the anti-objectification type who would oppose having such a scene despite her oppositions showing she's not equal to the men as they had to do it
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:27 PM
1

An accident is far more clear cut than rape. It often seems that rape is in the eye of the beholder these days, there's one concrete definition that everyone know and lots of little definitions that some believe and others don't, so the definition has become skewed. So instead of think that 'this person is describing being raped' one can't think 'this person may be describing being raped or something they think is rape' Some people may be reporting now on possible incidents from years ago that w…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 09:22 PM
1

Thus is a common answer. I'm definately gonna listen to some of their podcasts
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:25 PM
3

It's not rude nor is it jargon, it's an actual term, it is however an error on my part to have used the acronym rather than the full term
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:19 PM
1

Legal Paternal Surrender. My bad for not putting it properly in the title
/r/MensRights18/09/18 08:17 PM
22

hatefacts reeeeeee
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:55 PM
10

I've seen that. The moderator was terrible, he let them interrupt milo but didn't let milo interrupt them on the rare chance he did. I think it ended with them getting to say their piece then when milo began his final statement they said they were out if time
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:53 PM
1

Yeah I messed up I should've been clearer
/r/MensRights18/09/18 07:48 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:35 PM
8

It's to give men the option within the first few weeks of the knowing about a pregnancy to absolve financial responsibility thus affording men the same right to choose not to become a parent that abortion affords women
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:09 PM
15

Nor does she account for the fact that women can choose to give the child up for adoption or legally abandon the child in son places to avoid supporting the child and that men can’t do that
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:26 PM
2

Yeah I don’t want to be cynical but it’s probable that the advice is raising boys in a way that’s betterment for the women in their lives.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:09 PM
3

This reminds me of a cartoon strip where a woman goes to her boss to complain that she’s the only one in the office not being harassed and is wondering why
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:06 PM
3

Reads like they assume the men are guilty of assaulting women and search for anything that can suggest this may be the slightest bit probable.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 04:05 PM
5

I was thinking of posting to Askmen to find a men’s website that isn’t pro-feminist as I went to GQ and it’s chock full of social justice
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:59 PM
2

The journalist tweet is so misleading. He said he spoke to only two and couldn’t get in contact with the others but stated that only these two support Kavanaugh as if he did speak to these others and they said they don’t support him. Them not responding to him is not a statement of non-support on the matter but he’s writing it in a way to mislead people to think this
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:41 PM
3

Following complaints from a feminist student, who found Hesslow's course to be an expression "of his personal anti-feminist agenda," Christer Larsson, the chairman of the program board for medical education, summoned Hesslow for a meeting within the management team I bet if someone accused a gender studies course of being an expression of the professors “personal feminist agenda” the professor would’nt have been taken before management
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:34 PM
1

It should only factor in if breastfeeding is considered mandatory. But it’s not. Whenever the benefits of Breastfeeding are brought up there’s usually lots of women opposed to it. Breastfeeding is almost taboo these days. If you say it’s better your considered oppressive to women as if you’re claiming women should be forced to do it.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:16 PM
25

Whenever I debate this topic I make a point of stating that ’after conception’ women have choices men don’t to try to avoid the “he shouldn’t have had sex then” argument from people. It doesn’t really work. People seem to not see the cognitive dissonance in applying this argument to men but opposing it application to women
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:10 PM
76

I hate when people who are pro-choice use pro-life arguments and don’t see the hypocrisy. To this person consent to sex is consent to parenthood but only for men. They say “agreeing to something (sex = parenthood) then backing out is cowardly” but speak of abortion as if it not “backing out”. Such double standards blow my mind
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:01 PM
12

One of the common themes is whether or not it should be considered abuse as the intent isn’t to cause harm but is based on medical reasons. It raises an interesting question; what matters more intent or result?
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:35 PM
86

So femspreading?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/18 07:10 PM
2

She thinks the ref is holding her to a different standard than male players. That he punished her but in the same scenario wouldn't have punished a man. It's just her being pissed off and throwing a tantrum because she broke the rules and they weren't bent for her
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:06 PM
9

This isn't graffiti or vandalism it's correcting sexist propaganda to be more equal and inclusive
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:27 PM
8

All forms of violence are abhorrent. However, with one in three women experiencing physical or sexual violence in their lifetime, there is no doubt that this is a gender-based issue," he said. I'm pretty sure men experience more physical violence than women. “I am also extremely disappointed to learn that the billboards with the White Ribbon message have been repeatedly vandalised to include the words ‘and men’," she said. “Violence in our society needs to end. There is absolutely no excuse for …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:26 PM
1

What’s frustrating is she likely views men as toxic but insists men be treated badly thus keeping men toxic. She doesn’t see that helping men and boys helps society as a whole, including women and girls
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:41 AM
10

That scale image is shameful. It’s deliberately making it a comparison to show that one is more important than the other, they shouldn’t make it a ‘competition’ they could easily just say x% of girls self-harm. It would be about girls but at least it wouldn’t outright minimises boys entirely It essentially translates to ”girls matter more”
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:31 AM
10

Men’s rights has little to no affiliation with MGTOW or Incels or PUA or the alt-right or white supremacy or misogyny yet because it speaks on behalf of men and because it’s anti-feminist which is wrongfully considered with anti-women we are lumped in with those other groups, usually by bias media to discredit the validity of men’s issues
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:24 AM
1

men should compliment women's talents, personalities ect as much as women do that to men
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:49 PM
2

This has always irked me. When people hold signs that read 'teach men not to rape' my second thought after 'we already are', is that men are raised mostly by women so how is it they manage to completely absolve said women on their part in raising rapists? When you think about it "teach men not to rape" is an admission that mothers and (mostly female) teachers failed to teach boys right from wrong. Why is it other mens fault or responsibility for criminal men when these men are raised more by wom…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:11 PM
17

The U.K is majority white so the national broadcasters of the U.K. should represent the country as majority white. If you said that China shouldn't have Asian people on TV you'd be called racism. That's what the BBC is essentially saying
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:06 PM
1

Rather than "listen and believe" the approach should be "listen, support and investigate"
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:02 PM
3

It would be great if there was more awareness and activism in the UK but seems the vocal MRA supporters are Canadian/Australian/American
/r/MensRights25/08/18 08:00 PM
3

I gave it a chance to see if it wasn't the usual and sadly it was. It misrepresents MRAs as Incels and PUA, conflates anti-feminism with anti-woman and promotes that only a feminist approach can help men and that MRAs blame women for institutional bias, which we don't
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:54 PM
4

but mostly it's GLORIFICATION. It's a damn WORSHIP of the female body, form, etc I never considered that but women’s bodies are valued not only in looks more than men’s but in safety and in value to society with the “our bodies can create life, yours can’t, and “our bodies our choice”. Women’s bodies are a celebrated and protected class compared to mens
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:43 PM
2

Ms Cotton, the first woman to hold the LFB's most senior position, said: 'I'm especially concerned about how many young people think firefighting is for men. So it isn’t for men? She likely meant to say “I'm especially concerned about how many young people think firefighting is only for men”. But isn’t competent enough to get her words to match her meaning. 'When popular shows like Love Island roll out every offensive cliche possible Offensive to you perhaps. Not offensive to the majority It rei…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:38 PM
2

Surely anti-Male sentiment falls under men’s rights as it undermines support for all the other issues you mentioned.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:02 PM
10

Yes there is no sexual activity, no rape. But it’s essentially depicting the seduction of a child and that would be considered simulated grooming at least, if it were a man doing similar. If a man was oiling his pecs and abs interspersed with clips of a tween girl biting her lip or gawking in attraction then surely he’d be labelled a pedophile for such a video her here people seem fine with it. I know the clip of the boy is from the sandlot but that was him lusting after a woman whereas this vid…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:42 PM
5

If she had left it at "we need men" and "we need men who are proud of being men" and "diminishing men will not elevate women" and didn't quantify it as "strong men", thus dismissing all other men, then this would be a great message, as such it's still a good message as its empowering for men, but with an ulterior motive of as a means to an end for protecting society that has given up giving men credit when they do this. She and others should ask why men are less likely marry, to help a stranger …
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:44 PM
15

Person obviously has no idea what male disposability means if they think being thought of as less capable is in anyway similiar
/r/MensRights02/08/18 10:41 PM
3

They have called the rally to "remind men that it is okay to be masculine. This is a quote from their page. By opposing this they oppose the notion that it's okay for men to be masculine. Pretty much confirms that all masculinity is toxic to these loons
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:47 PM
2

Misogyny won't fix men's problems Pro-men and/or anti feminism isn't misogynistic. But of course they can't understand that. by reinforcing the toxic, false ideas that make men's lives difficult Because of course men are incapable of having difficult lives
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:44 PM
3

Yeah but we both know which of these two groups will be peaceful and respectful and which will harass and thrown urine bottles and chant hateful things
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:43 PM
26

100% chance this guy is liberal who calls himself an "ally" to several group identities
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:26 PM
22

I was disappointed in this. It's like saying they want to bring awareness but have to maintain their narrative that it's only ever men that are bad. She also went out of her way to dismiss the prevalence of false allegations of rape which cemented her position as bias in favour of women. However it's a step, perhaps we shouldn't expect such people to promote full truths yet but get there after building up to it which is better than outright igniting it.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:17 PM
4

This was good to see. Unfortunately people are acting as if we aren't glad to see this and are crediting feminism but either way it's awareness so it's a step in the right direction for male victims.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 09:15 PM
1

It’s not assumptions. The document linked clearly states funding and services for a crime that affects men 40% of the time are almost entirely gendered for women
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:31 PM
1

23 organisations offer refuge or safe house provision for male victims in the UK - a total of 110 spaces, of which 34 are dedicated to male victims only (the rest being for victims of either gender). There are no refuge or safe houses in London. There were nearly 400 specialist domestic violence organisations providing refuge accommodation for women in the UK with c4,000 spaces for over 7,000 women Source Compare those numbers and say with a straight face that funding and support isn’t dispropor…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 06:28 PM
1

It’s not 3/10 it’s almost 5/10. It’s like if a hospital knows they have 10 ambulances to use. Obviously they will send more of them to areas that need more help lol this is the dumbest post I’ve ever seen here If this was the case they’d send the ambulances to those most in need regardless of gender. What is actually happing is sending the vast majority to women based on gender and ignore men suffering because they matter less. But tuning with your logic how does this explain that the initiative…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:58 PM
5

Nice to see. Sadly it looks like it was printed by one informed person rather than apart of a mass-produced campaign
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:04 PM
1

Sounds more like he's teaching his son never to help others and teaching his daughter to be a bitch who finds fault with people trying to be helpful
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:54 PM
3

The quote sounds like something a woman would say to defend her boyfriend from being called a rapist for them having consensual sex while drunk. That she is responsible for being drunk, not him, that he isn't a rapist just because some suit decided her he consent isn't valid after a few sherries. the effects of alcohol may make someone incapable of consenting Unless they're male.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:37 PM
3

Seems she's more enamoured with him helping someone he didn't have to. Helping a woman specifically no doubt made the gesture more sweet for her but I don't see this as him being of use but exhibiting charity and aid
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:20 PM
32

The full quote which I couldn’t post in the title is thus We recognise that men can also be victims of domestic abuse and our approach will be to benefit all victims. However, women are much more likely than men to be victims of high risk or severe domestic abuse, and therefore more in need of refuges and other forms of specialist accommodation based services. We expect our fund will primarily focus on the needs of women and children suffering violence as set out in our VAWG Strategy VAWG stands…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:02 PM
21

The way it seems is that fathers have to prove their good parents and mothers have to prove their bad parents and it takes a lot for the of proof for the justice system
/r/MensRights03/07/18 02:11 PM
2

I’ve seen this. The message at the ends was great but if kids saw most of it they would see the girls agreeing with the villain
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:29 PM
96

The move is part of plans to try to reduce the number of female offenders serving short jail terms. But not men The article in big bold lettering states that there are 83,000 prisoners in England and Wales with only 3,850 of those being women so naturally why help the vast majority aka men. "As more female offenders are primary carers than their male counterparts, these sentences lead to a disproportionate impact on children and families” So basically being a mother means you should have a get o…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:18 PM
2

Convicting someone of a crime requires guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors should be JUST as careful about deciding to charge women who may have lied about rape as men who are accused. Not being able to prove rape is absolutely not the same thing as proving a woman made it all up. We should not confuse the two Absolutely agree. The two women mentioned in the article were convicted, hence why I noted that detail
/r/MensRights02/07/18 12:53 AM
21

You’ll notice lots of emotive language such as ‘vulnerable’ and passages about motherhood and separation of child and mother and breastfeeding and in general the author writes as if the women are victims not perpetrators and are being innocents persecuted not criminals punished. Ironically the author mentions the women’s reputations being destroyed and thejr job prospects reduced and how this has a deep affect to their mental health while ignoring that the falsely accused suffered the same
/r/MensRights01/07/18 11:40 PM
1

True. But Male judges are the ones who are lenient on female rapists and make the rules different for men and women and the media, generally ran by men, skew reporting to always make the women seem like victims or absolve them of responsibility. Culturally men and women accept the double standards but it’s mostly men in positions of power than set up and maintain the double standard
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:51 PM
3

So basically this guy sounds like an introvert or he's decided to not bother with women except the bare essentials and they get him fired for not being friendly enough to women. So basically if men interact with women in the workplace they risk any little thing becoming an issue and getting them fired but if they don’t interact with women they also get fired. Can’t win. What surprises me l, though it shouldn’t, is she feels entitled to his attention. Telling him to smile it delightfully ironic g…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:40 PM
1

She argued that they have every right to use their bodies to make a living: ‘I believe equality is all about women having choice. 'The choice to spend money on having plastic surgery and the choice to earn money from their looks.' 'What right have feminists to march and say we don't want this anymore?' The biggest opposition to feminist goals is women’s freedom of choice. All efforts are to change women’s choices to men’s choices. STEM, wage gap, attack on feminine beauty. It all comes down to m…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:13 PM
3

Threatening violence, taking personal photographs, sending offensive material Starting point: 18 weeks custody So the sentence she got is is 12 months which is below the minimum since she threatened violence.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 03:43 PM
2

Harassment without violence means surely harassment without threats of violence. If violence was involved it wouldn’t be harassment it would be assault
/r/MensRights16/06/18 03:19 PM
5

Dangerous advice. She’s basically telling women to be reckless because bad people who would victimise them shouldn’t exist. Such advice will result in more women harmed than if you told Them to look out for their safety as much as possible
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:23 PM
2

Good article except for the end where the author seems to justify and embrace the misandry as female empowerment
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:18 PM
2

Quite sexist to think that women will like the movie just because they’re the same sex as the cast. As if the sex of the audience changes the quality of the movie
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:03 PM
4

I would personally say that my solution to rape would be to make sure that all rapists are chemically castred before they leave prison Only problem with this is a man convicted of rape doesn't means he's factually a rapist. The U.K CPS have been found out to be withholding evidence that could clear men accused of rape to shore up conviction numbers. So it's likely there's some innocent men behind bars who would have thus done to them upon release. As such it would be cruel so and unusual punishm…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:10 PM
1

If the men did step in she'd very likely scald them for assuming she needs the protection of a white man. Just look at the way she says "white men" repeatedly as if that's a bad thing mentions the race of those who helped her as being non-white. She's clearly got a whiteness issue where she views white men as bad and people of colour as good. Heck she's crazy enough to blame the men who didn't risk their lives to save hers (which given her attitude isn't worth risking ones life for) MORE than th…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:59 PM
1

The author ignores that while conservative mens groups restrict to conservative MRAs are for all men. And I'm pretty sure PUAs don't discriminate against non-white men. The authors argument seems to be refuted by the recent intersectional branch of bashing "white feminism" which claims that mainstream feminism only helps white women and not women of colour. Thirdly the answer to his question is obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of gender. Men have an out-group preference for helping w…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:30 PM
3

Yeah I hate this. They always have a "well that's not how most feminists think or how real feminism is" Which is just a way to excuse and allow misandry from feminists while telling people not to associate it with feminism
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:18 PM
2

That question is so bigoted and anti-equality and yet the asker probably wonders why MRA exists. This was a good answer. The only problem is it's too generous to feminists. She doesn't mention the third example after classifying it and that's unfiryptubateky the example I tend to see most of with #1 being the rarest
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:10 PM
3

The research found that many women simply do not feel safe cycling. It's almost as if men are more natural risk takers or something. Just 27% thought cycling safety was good in their city. Won't somebody please think of the children women! "There should be investment in on-road dedicated cycle lanes, protected from motor traffic, that get people to where they want to go directly and efficiently," said cyclist Verity Leigh, from Edinburgh. Sure, because women don't 'feel' safe. It could be that c…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:58 PM
5

Much of the criticism was grounded in straightforward misogyny -- with a certain kind of male moviegoer scandalized both by the presumption of a remake and by the very idea of women trying to be funny. It wasn't hatred of women. Kill Bill, Hunger Games and others are very successful female-led movies. The hatred was taking a male-led franchise and making it female. It's about shitting on nostalgia for the sake of being progressive "Even though I can get excited for a movie like 'Ocean's 8'... at…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:01 AM
3

CHS has an attachment to the term feminist. She is reluctant to let it go as she probably thinks feminism can be salvaged
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:55 AM
2

And the southern poverty law center calls her a male supremacist
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:54 AM
2

It amazes me how they can run stories stating that women have most debt while also stating that women are underrepresented. The former disproves the latter
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:53 AM
1

I'd love to do this. I'd just walk forward and forward until I've walked away from these fools
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:51 AM
2

there's no evidence that feminists behave more negatively towards men” outside of a psychology research lab. He mustn't had seen or heard any feminists outside his lab
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:29 AM
11

shocking explanations for not having more women on top company boards include ‘they don’t fit in’, ‘they don’t want the hassle’ and ‘all the good ones have already gone’ I can understand the 'they don't want the hassle' because it's not male employees complaining about the air conditions being sexist or suing the employer if a guy looks at them for too long or demanding free daycare be built into the company. That's a lot of hassle. As for the 'all the good ones have gone' well women in such pos…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:07 AM
6

I’m glad you and your wife made an arrangement that’s working out for the two of you.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:02 PM
14

I disagree that the shortlist was made to force a women to get the spot. If that was the case, they would have chosen a lesser male candidate. That’s a good point Once men and women are given the choice on who gets the kids and who gets the career. Well this choice is present already, for those both with custody. The problem is that economically we’ve made a system where families need two incomes rather than one so kids are raised partially by mum and dad and partially by the others like state f…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:38 PM
1

men's voices have been heard enough, it's time for women Hahaha. Ironic since womens voices can get away with so much that men can’t and
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:45 PM
3

This is a good point but In my opinion there’s been no major changes that would alter the data significantly. Sure there are more fathers involved in changing nappies and taking the kids to parks than back then but the courts are still as bias and there’s a bigger push for single motherhood now so if anything things may be slightly worse than back then
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:25 PM
18

Sarah Smith, professor of economics at Bristol University, said Prof Haskell was "without doubt an excellent appointment, but this leaves only one woman on the committee". Economics suffered from "serious under-representation of women at all levels", she added. How? How does the gender of economists not their economic intelligence affect the economy? They always say women are needed but what they mean is they want women in these positions.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:05 PM
159

”The fact that four women were shortlisted shows that there are plenty of capable and well qualified women, but yet again the top jobs seem to be reserved for men." The fact that the overwhelming majority of applicants were male and the shortlist was just one man and four women shows that the shortlisting was done to try to force a woman to get the spot They sought out more women than men to apply. 19 men and 8 women applied but despite double the men applying the shortlist was 3/4 women. Then w…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:02 PM
3

I think there’s a fundamental difference in how men are raised to react to sexual harassment and assault compared to women. You wouldn’t make a big stink about it because you’ve been raised to shrug it off whereas women are raised to take it seriously. Same can be said of many things. Men are genderally less offended and complain less than women. Partly because they don’t let things get to them and partially because society doesn’t care about men’s experiences as much as women’s
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:59 PM
3

I don’t like the whole “everything is a social construct” thing because men and women are different but how you are willing to be treated is something that is socially constructed and men are raised to allow sexual assault and taught it’s a compliment. Things are changing though as ilthe double standard is known and more are awakening to realising that wind women shouldn’t have to put up with unwanted sexual contact then neither should men
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:55 PM
3

Women took offense to the fact that their designated parking spots were made larger because they thought it implied that women were bad drivers On the other hand, some feminists did not take to the fact that the spots were painted pink, much less that a woman wearing a pink mini skirt was also painted on the spot. They thought this was considered very sexist and demeaning towards women Once again they get special treatment and instead of trying to remedy this by removing he special treatment to …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:51 PM
38

Well you have the legal right to keep it in your pants I hate the hypocrisy of this. It’s no longer acceptable and considered oppression to tell women to just not have sex if they don’t want to get pregnant. The argument is: ’if you have sex and there’s a pregnancy then you should be forced to become a parent’, but this argument is only allowed to be applied to men. And they don't see that they’re using anti-abortion arguments (against men) while being pro-choice (for women) Whenever I bring up …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:44 PM
17

This isn’t gender neutral it’s feminisation. It if was neutral they could wear shorts or skirts
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:38 PM
1

What bothers me is the majority seem to support punishing false accusers to the same level as the punishment the falsely accused would receive but the justice system would never dare do that for fear of upsetting the radical minority
/r/MensRights27/05/18 11:03 PM
35

He opens doors for women at work, but they’re metaphorical doors, like the ones that lead to promotions. So women are incapable of succeeding without the help of a man, got it.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:50 PM
7

Yeah this is her acting as if she was harassed to get oppression points and her face on the news and idiotically citing this non-example of harassment which most interpret just like OP did.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:46 PM
5

Ugh. Because women are never responsible for their own safety and choices. I swear if a woman walked down the street in the rape capital of the world butt naked with 'rape me' painted on her chest, they'd say she had no part in whatever happened.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:42 PM
1

Idiots. They wouldn't be good guys they'd be bad guys in disguise
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:39 PM
1

If men’s rights movement got their issues resolved then for you it would mean if you were ever on trial you would be treated equally to a woman. Equal due process and equal sentencing to that of a woman who committed he same crime. It would mean you get to retain equal pay for equal work rather than being paid less which will likely happen in a few years. It would mean you wouldn’t be considered a second-class parent If you have a son he would have a choice over whether or not he becomes a paren…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:52 PM
1

I agree. It I wouldn’t call it a patriarchal system since women influence many policies when it comes to gender
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:47 PM
1

Men kill themselves and all she thinks about is the women maids
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:44 PM
1

In the U.K. women have infanticide defence if they kill their child within the first 12 months of having it. Men do not have his defence
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:38 PM
1

It does state that men can’t be raped but only by a man
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:34 PM
1

A person (A) commits an offence if: b (B) doesn’t consent to the penetration So if (A) is the woman and (B) is the man then if he doesn’t consent to the penetration then she if a rapist. Surely that’s a technicality that means women can be prosecuted But I bet in order to be prosecuted the “a” condition has to be met before “b” is applied Also “c” is worrisome as it seems to make consent subjective should the alleged victim decide so
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:33 PM
1

Why aren’t feminists going after Instagram models and girls who voluntarily post photos objectifying themselves? They are the ones teaching men that women want to be valued for their looks
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:30 PM
2

I agree that boys shouldn’t be snapping bras and such but If boys stopped giving girls attention they’d probably complain about that. But frankly dress codes are dress codes and boys have to follow them too. They exist to teach you that you have to accept dress codes for your job later in life. Breaking the rules for girls will just teach them if they don’t like something in life should can complain to get it changed rather than learn to live within societies rules
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:28 PM
1

I bet Ms Marvel won’t have the obligatory topless shot. Equality my ass
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:15 PM
1

My issue with toxic masculinity is fourfold There’s never any talk of positive masculinity so it infers that all masculinity is toxic. it blames men for men holding back emotions and being ‘tough’ and ignores the evidence of when men do open up and get told to shut up and how society not masculinity expects men to be tough. I’m of the opinion that men would open up more if society had the same level of empathy and concern and support services for men as it does for women. There’s the problem of …
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:22 PM
1

Society has always let men express emotions, but our grandfathers wisely taught us society doesn't care for weak man nor do they care for our problems. They taught us to be strong. I agree with this. “Toxic masculinity” isn’t men’s issue it’s societies lack of empathy toward men that cause men to learn not to open up because people didn’t care when they did
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:13 PM
5

No it’s not if their in equal positions of risk by choice. If she’s a hero or villain on the field with the men then she should be treated like a man. Good and bad. That means if they show her hitting men she should be shown taking some hits. I hate how mystique and black widow take out groups of men without taking a single punch. They become Mary sues who don’t have to suffer for their victories like the men do who get hit in the process
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:07 PM
2

The idea is to protect the right of trans members in Labour who have not legally changed gender but are criticised by some feminist activists for undermining women But not undermining men. It’s as if F2M trans don’t exist to people. They only worry about Transwomen (men) in women’s spaces and never Transmen (women) in men’s spaces
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:02 PM
1

I agree this is universal advice but Terry chose this advice for young men so eh it’s kinda innocence by omission for women who seek to control their men but I doubt he intended it that way Edit: after seeing the full quote Terry went full on SJW and spoke of toxic masculinity and this implied that controlling behaviour is a male problem. I’m disappointed in him
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:54 PM
3

Physical strength means little when it comes to abuse. Victims are mentally unable to fight back so it doesn’t matter if the guy is the size of Terry Crews. If the woman has mentally broken him down then he will take her abuse without defending himself
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:43 PM
17

https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/the-penis-facial-is-the-latest-disturbing-beauty-treatment/
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:57 PM
1

“I think what their campaign is saying is that women lie about rape, about sexual assault to get back at a boyfriend,” said Karen Smith No the campaign says that regrettable sex is not rape
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:53 PM
1

Bigots. It should be a gender-neutral-identifying gay, atheist, vegan feminist of colour
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:41 PM
2

Well I'm cured. Until reading this I didn't know it was wrong to rape women in lifts. /s
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:23 PM
1

No audio
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:14 AM
7

Technically trans women are men All Women. You don't get to just select who you support So remember boys and girls when you dislike paedophile women and murderer women and abusive women and women who throw babies off rooftops you're being oppressive and have to remember its your job to support all women
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:07 AM
-1

Yes, that was about a men's cancer and If this post of his was about a woman's cancer it would make sense to have all the female paraphernalia but it's about cancer, overall cancer not just women's cancer so the association is that overall cancer is more a women's issue than a non-gendered issue via the usage of Pink which is associated with girls (blue for boys), the feminist pillow and the pussy hat from the women's march in the background. They are all in place so the consumers of this post a…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 10:40 AM
6

Once again a men's issue is being told from the perspective of helping women. What's sad is there's alot of comments on other subs saying men should be forced to take the leave to equalise the earnings. So they want men to be forced not to work to make up for women not working. They want to take away his choice to use his body to work
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:43 PM
2

I don't see it. He's shown getting angry and aggressive for struggling with the math and his appearance grows more disheveled and he seems out of his depth. A woman in this position would be depicted as calm if a little frustrated but not looking hungover or out of control. In the first movie bob distances himself from his family to chase his dreams and was presented as selfish for doing so and learns that his family is what's most important. This time Helen does the same but is celebrated for i…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:43 PM
8

Men just need to be allowed to be men without the constant scorn and disdain levelled at them for our gender
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:31 PM
6

She basically claims that rape can only be committed by one gender to another
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:12 PM
2

How can due process serve men more than women when men not women make up the vast majority of those convicted? If due process served men then there'd be a lot less men in jail
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:08 PM
0

The puppy is safe. It was given to a shelter, it's welfare isn't in jeopardy. The homeless however is at much more risk than the puppy so the article should focus on the one at greater risk
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:47 PM
-14

True but 85% of those in the UK who are homeless are men so it's a reasonable assumption
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:45 PM
1

Seven years later and it's just gotten worse
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:42 PM
1

In almost all societies a lot of men enjoy unwarranted advantages simply because of their sex And considerably more unwarranted disadvantages because of their sex
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:40 PM
1

The comments saw through the Misandry and countered the narrative. That's good to see
/r/MensRights04/01/18 04:39 PM
7

But in this case women dating preferences exposes them to a selection of men who are more toxic than other men but the movement doesn't differentiate so the decent guy is being considered a harasser because of the jerks women choose to involve themselves with. It's basically negative collectivism but on a scale that is amplified due to gynocentrism and the media attention given to women's experiences
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:51 PM
4

And you know what's even more insulting? That women are so used to ignoring completely the common, unsexy, respectful man, that they don't even realize we exist anymore. They condemn all men because they only see the powerful alpha types that treat them like crap. The rest of us are in women's blind spot like we've always been. This is an excellent point. Since women tend to prefer the confident alpha jerk guys which by definition don't value them or respect them then of course they'll project t…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:49 PM
18

My problem with the term is that there's never ever any contrasting talk of positive masculinity. So the only talk of masculinity is in a negative context.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:45 PM
11

In my doctors surgery I saw a pamphlet for testicular cancer. I had a look and it gave unbias stats that more men die from cancer than women rather than omitting this fact and it had the temerity so state and I quote "cancer isn't all pink ribbons, it's a mens issue too" which I wouldn't have expected
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:42 PM
8

She said workplaces must foster an environment where harassment victims can come forward knowing they'll be believed. This bothers me great as it's the usual 'listen and believe' mentality that is quite sexist as it tends to advocate for believing the woman and thus believing the man guilty which is presumption of guilt rather than presumption of innocence. HR shouldnt believe a claimant as that believes the man is guilty without sufficient cause. Employees claims of harassment should be investi…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 04:08 AM
1

What annoys me is the majority of people (at least from the comments and things I've read elsewhere) agree with this and would be fine with it being implemented but no politicians are calling for it and the few who advocate for anything that would help men are swamped by feminists when they try. So the people want it but not the government or justice system
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:51 AM
7

I was disappointed that some of the comments likened MRAs to radical feminists while stating that there are moderate feminists and radical feminists but not moderate MRAs. It was good to Someone point out that MRAs no matter how polite, civil, egalitarian and non-hostile are considered radical by merely existing
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:20 PM
2

Adovcating common sense and women taking personal responsibility for their safety will get her a lot of hate from those who think they support women but actually infantilise and absolve them of any accountability as if their children
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:51 PM
2

I'm actually for this, it'll disprove the narratives that women are angelic creatures and that aggression, arguments and event violence are male constructs because these women will end up at each other's throats
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:47 PM
3

Yeah this happened to me there too a while back. They think circumcision isn't mutiliation despite the fact it fits the definition but are fine for female circumcision to be called mutilation because they view one as acceptable and the other as not. This has nothing to do with body-shaming as men don't get offended as much as women do about factual comments about their bodies and they don't apply it to discussions of FMG for the same logic, it's is sexism plain and simple to allow one act of mut…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:42 PM
25

That's standard nowadays, just look at how the term misogyny is thrown around. When one person says a comment about one woman it's cited as hatred of all women
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:23 PM
5

So to them facebook silencing hateful women who post sexist comments is Facebook silencing all women. The hypocrisy is maddening. They want carte Blanche to post sexism while demanding that men be punished for posting sexism
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:22 PM
2

See, this is the problem... When it comes to female criminals, these judges are willing to consider all kinds of “special” circumstances/factors when deciding their sentence..... But when it comes to male criminals, ... well, they aren’t given that same courtesy Exactly. Such inequality would never be permitted if men were given such concessions
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:09 AM
1

So basically only imprison women when their incredibly violent and dangerous but you can circumvent that too by jumping through hoops to use 'underlying factors' to nullify this
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:06 AM
2

Wow. So him handing her some booze and a prescription medication makes him abusive and absolves her of stabbing him?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:03 AM
1

She's a terrible psychologist for this. You don't shame someone you listen and try to persuade gently if they're possibly a danger otherwise you understand and offer insightful counter-points to get the patient thinking in different perspectives
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:58 AM
7

Hmm. She was pretty much stating that physically abusive men deserve to get physically assaulted as opposed to all men or non-violent men. I can't disagree. If you're a physically abusive person you do deserve a slap. The in public thing I disagree with though
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:53 AM
41

Not only is she insulting male suicide victims but she's casually saying that women are better at men in everything. Wow, poor lad to have been raised by this woman
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:47 AM
3

In reality it's a bias that most people have that interprets any advocacy for men as an attack on Spot on. Some people have this bias so entrenched that they'd oppose something, anything that benefits men even slightly because to them a benefit to men is a drawback for women. The protests of TRP documentary spring to mind
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:45 AM
3

Since that one attack in Charlottesville the media has adopted "white supremacy" as the new boogeyman and applies it to everything
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:42 AM
3

How typical of Vice to want to reduce radicalisation of young men by shaming them into submission (like that won't fuel them) while ignoring and even sometimes encouraging the radicalisation of young women Ideology functions by creating a monolithic enemy: In the case of misogyny clusters, the enemy is the woman. You can easily switch men with women and misogyny with Misandry and you have the description of a number of subreddits. But once again only misogyny is validated, never Misandry The jar…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:17 AM
1

Fascinating point. Perhaps due to feminism over the years women have come to over-identify with their gender that their gendered issues trump their human issues
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:42 PM
3

I'm not a huge fan of saying "patriarchy theory", but for the sake of this conversation, does patriarchy theory really ignore the fact that men in power don't care for men as a whole? Don't feminists actually say that "the patriarchy hurts men too"? It sounds to me like "men in power don't really care for men as a whole" might be a subheading of "the patriarchy hurts men too". I'd agree with that. Though IMO it would be more accurate to say "The patriarchy hurts men more" as a big part of the la…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:39 PM
3

Men in power don't really care for men as a whole, that's what patriarchy theory ignores. You can see this with the way the government fund female cancer research more than mens despite men dying more, with the way they push campaigns for women's progression in education and employment but not mens even when women are already ahead of men such as in college enrolment, with the way they fund and promote services to help female victims of crime but not men, the way they invalidate female perpetrat…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:02 PM
2

Patriarchy is men. It's men in power. What I laugh at is they want to smash the patriarchy but don't offer a replacement system of governance. They'd claim equal numbers of men and women but you'd know they would actually install a matriarchy. And ironically a matriarchy would probably grant less privilege to women than he patraircjy does as women don't bend over backward to please women as men do
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:46 PM
10

Eh this isn't too much different from the buffer urinal rule for men
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:17 PM
1

The only issue I have with infanticide defence is it's a get out of jail free card for any woman who kills her child in the first 12 months as you just know the courts won't demand an official diagnosis of post-natal desperation but will just apply infanticide to any murderess Not only are women permitted to kill their unborn babies but their newborns too. I wouldn't be surprised if they made some new defence to cover women killing their child up to fives years old next
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:06 PM
2

This isn't really related to MeToo but it is related to that British woman who protested against sleeping beauty because it wasn't consensual here
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:02 PM
3

"And furthermore, these aren't even necessarily male and female jobs, but instead jobs with a people vs thing orientation. Or to make this more clear, the jobs are "stereotypically male or female." They are just jobs that men and women have always preferred to" Gender roles weren't fashioned from evil patriarchal males as the narrative goes. Gender norms are simply observations of the two sexes and roles drawn up based on these observations. So it's not a case that men and women were forced into…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 11:56 PM
4

I think your exactly right. They interviewed a professor who was there to discuss biological differences between men and women and discussed the bell curve the discredited wage gap which piers and co support and Piers acted like a child, constantly interrupting and even insulting this mans accent to try to get him to say something actually misogynistic so they could get that soundbyte for their narrative.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/17 11:37 PM
16

I hate Jess Phillips. She is so smug and arrogant and misandrist. And she's proud to be this way. She's a real-life radfem and it saddens me that she has any power and influence
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:58 PM
109

So when women ask their boyfriends to do things is that a subtle form of misandry? I bet not, I bet it's a one way street to this author
/r/MensRights20/11/17 04:24 PM
6

"No further communication is wanted" This is the PR speak equivalent of sticking fingers in your ears and yelling lalalalalalala
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:33 PM
18

It's a bad argument to begin with. They cite that there are more men in power/politics than women so therefore men overall have it better as it pre-supposes that these men in power use their power exclusively to help men and oppress women when the opposite is closer to the truth as the men in power follow feminist policy and fund women's issues far more than mens. Patriarchy benefits women far more than men
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:28 PM
3

Article has now been removed. Typical
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:22 PM
4

Last year, two-fifths of all tweets about IMD were posted around March 8, which just happened to be International Women’s Day And that accounted for a drop in the water of tweets considered int that on Instagram there's over 2.4 MILLION posts about IWD compared to 10,000 for IMD. So the reason men posted on international women's day is because of the severe disparity in concern and awareness each day gets
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:20 PM
2

Well done lads. Sadly it shouldn't have taken so many request, the fact that it did shows the bias against men
/r/MensRights19/11/17 09:15 PM
4

I believe in the UK men cannot seek a DNA test of their child to see if their the father or not without he mothers permission. So he could be raising or paying for a bastard and suspect it but not be able to attain proof
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:40 PM
6

How can you not frame the debate about who has it worse in areas where one gender clearly have it worse? Rape is considered a women's issue because rape (outside of prisons) happens more to women, though the majority isn't as stark as we're led to believe, but it's a majority so the issue is framed as a women's issue which is fair. Conversely since suicide and homelessness affects men more by a huge margi. Why shouldn't these be considered mens issues. All we wan is consistency
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:23 PM
2

I never thought of it that way. I was colour focused on the different shades of blue for men and others of the IMD logo that I did it this way
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:44 PM
17

I posted this to r/UKpolitics last night and it attracted healthy debate. I woke this morning to find this message from the mods "I've removed this as "spam" due to the title. If you want to discuss these issues, a self-post, setting out some sources, discussion points etc. might be better. That said, I'm not sure the adversarial "men v women - let's fight" approach it takes is particularly useful." The title of the post was "please post this on your social media profile(s) tomorrow to raise awa…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:06 PM
6

That wasn't then intent at all. I'm from the UK and thus sought out UK statistics. I admit I made a mistake in not citing that these are UK statistics as hat could lead some to presume their global or U.S statistics. But the numbers are far off in other countries...
/r/MensRights19/11/17 12:59 PM
5

I placed that because IMD is often joked at or spoken of as if it shouldn't exist but the point it exists because of these statistics
/r/MensRights19/11/17 12:57 PM
3

Wow. Thanks for the gold internet stranger
/r/MensRights19/11/17 12:53 PM
28

Well I'm from the UK, but the numbers are similiar in other western nations for some of these
/r/MensRights19/11/17 01:38 AM
46

Can only but try. There's nothing about women in the image and nothing hateful it's just a list of facts. If the media platform does remove them then it shows the sexism and bias of the media platform
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:23 PM
51

Undoubtedly that will happen but few can argue against this image as it shows men's issues in a concise way and if some SJW asks for sources we have them to give to shut down their attempts to call the stats lies
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:22 PM
34

So her forced apology wasn't sufficient a sacrifice to the SJW gods
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:08 PM
114

Only the brave
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:48 PM
247

Sources: Men make up 70.3% of homicide victims in the UK Men make up 76% of Suicides with 12 men taking their lives everyday in the UK, this makes Suicide the most common means of death for men under 45. Men are more likely to be victims of violent crime in the UK. Men make up 40% of domestic abuse victims. Men are 3.4 times more likely to be sent to prison than women for committing the same crime. Men on average serve 64% longer in prison than women when sentenced for the same crimes. If male o…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:01 PM
1

Why should there be a status quo change? It's like asking a person with a bottle of water in the desert to give it to another person so they can live while you die because a status quo change is needed without any reason given why women deserve more power than men. Give us some objective reasons why women need a status quo change and we'll considered it but we won't give you 100% power so we're left with 0% because that wouldn't be equality it would be shifting from one '-triarchy' for another
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:58 PM
1

Exactly, hypothetically it could've been a a case where someone drugged her then she chatted with a different guy and went off with him and had sex before she passed out
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:39 AM
1

She has no memory of the event, no evidence he drugged her or forced her to get drunk, no witnesses to the event but she just assumes she was raped. She hasn't for a moment considered that she got herself drunk and had regrettable sex which is likely what happened. The CPS were right not to proceed to court, it would be a waste of time and money but she's developed a victim-mentality and won't rest until her victimisation is validated by an official body. Y'know I hope she gets the money and tak…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:36 AM
1

Even feminist statistics count "not guilty" verdicts as "unconvicted rapes". So every guy who is found not guilty is a rapist that got away with it to them
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:27 AM
1

Their whole movement depends upon monopolizing the public discourse surrounding domestic and sexual violence, so they can propagate their victim narrative. This is what frustrates me the most. How they claim to want equality and claim they don't work against men's issues but whenever men's issues are raised their promptly shoved to the back of the line, to be fixed once every single issue and inconvenience women face is fixed plus all the new slights and oppressions they create to make it that w…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:16 AM
7

Not only are women expected to weather sexual violence, intimate partner violence, workplace discrimination, institutional subordination, the expectation of free domestic labor, the blame for our own victimization, and all the subtler, invisible cuts that undermine us daily, we are not even allowed to be angry about it. You wanted equality and you got it! everything you stated is experienced by men and for as long as time they've told to "man up" and called sexist and or 'fragile' if they stand …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:12 AM
1

"Still categorically worse on all fronts" ... "On the most disadvantaged group" So he just ignored all the stats and facts that show how men have it bad and maintains that women have it worse without any stats or facts to show it. I.e he ignored truth because it didn't fit his narrative
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:57 AM
9

Threefold Men aren't taught like women are to view unwanted sexual advances as inappropriate or illegal but to shrug it off or "appreciate the compliment", therefore the image of a male victim of women is hard to understand for the masses Gynocentrism. Society (via the media/government instruction) simply doesn't care or listen to mens problems as the narrative is that men don't have problems or men should just deal with them internally and as such no campaigns will take off and gain traction to…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:53 AM
2

The media gave them barely any coverage. If I didn't see terry crews tweets I wouldn't have known
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:44 AM
1

These women are excused for their complicity in his actions via their silence because their 'fragile helpless women' who couldn't possibly come forward sooner because of all the oppression preventing them from not taking his money or not fulfilling his wishes for that part and all the obstacles preventing them from filing a police report such as.... Nothing
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:43 AM
6

And it's okay for girls to hijack the Boy Scouts for girls
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:40 AM
1

Her first question is valid. Why is it that all the hashtags and campaigns and charities and support services don't start out as inclusive of male victims? She poses a good question that highlights the inequality then goes on to ignore it while she encourages the segregation of support for victims by gender. If she was inclusive (like she thinks she is) she'd not begrudge the issue of sexual assault or domestic violence being genderless to include both male and victim victims equally instead of …
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:37 AM
1

My god that's an infuriating read. So men who are abused are appropriating something from women eh? As if only women ever get abused and only women deserve support and only women matter and only women should have a space to discuss sexual assault. I HATE that thing are considered gendered and pretty much everything is gendered as a women's issue leaving men out in the cold to suffer in silence.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:29 AM
3

Indeed. Look at how these claims are huge media news being covered constantly and Feldmans and Haims claims were tossed aside almost straight away
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:23 AM
3

I think it has to do with the fact that we never see this portrayed in media of any kind You have to wonder, if that is by design
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:22 PM
3

They often speak about how women underreport their abuses but society is far more willing to believe a woman than a man so men are likely abused a lot more than we think and report even less than women do. I doubt the numbers would be equal but they'd be alot closer than the narrative we're fed. It's like how domestic abuse is framed as a women's issue, when in fact nearly half of victims are men. Male victims are invisible to society, society just doesn't seem to care about men being harmed and…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:05 PM
4

That's insane, and making it two different issues essentially means that one side gets ignored because right now (see always) we are talking about the women. Sadly that's how it always is. To them, men's issues can be seen to once every single issue big or miniscule that women face is fixed while they simultaneously create new issues daily like manspreading to add to the pile so that women's issues are never fixed and men's are given no validation whatsoever
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:56 PM
5

Every experience is valid and not to be minimized because the point of the exercise is to value the feelings of women First part of the sentence is about not excluding or minimising victims, while the second part excludes and minimises victims by specifying that only females matter If you want to talk about sexual assault against men (which IS an important issue) create your own post in your own time rather than jumping in and derailing discussions that focus on women. They can't because misandr…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:55 PM
7

Thing is there is nothing more to stop it. Feminists want due process for men scrapped and that's not gonna fly. Other than that there's no way to stop the few overall men who rape from raping, they do it despite being taught and told their whole lives not to.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:52 PM
2

I saw the hubbub about those two scenes. Female to male violence was fine and dandy but male to female was unacceptable. What's annoying is they don't see that their demanding unequal representation when they go on about equality and equal representation
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:31 PM
3

Exactly. Wonder Woman beats on tons of men and it's called empowering. Batman won't be shown beating on women because it would be oppressive and dangerous to promote violence against women.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:08 PM
2

He's partically correct. It seeing her as incapable of violence or causing harm because she's a woman's and that's "mens role" but that attitude is encouraged by feminism. He places this above the plight of the victim which is the man and the misandry of minimising male victims experiences. So two sexisms are at work one big one against men that has devasting results and one against women that absolves them of responsibility and treats them better than male abusers But because of his indoctrinat…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:57 PM
1

The irony is delicious
/r/MGTOW17/07/17 07:02 AM
2

There's multiple people corroborating her story. It may not be proof but it seems the girl is a serial liar and messed up and that her claims are likely false
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:35 PM
11

There's so much empowerment for women but next to none for men and boys. Most often we're 'default' thus not special or shamed for being male. And yet some like to claim that "everyday is international men's day" despite almost all support and encouragement and charity and concern being exclusively aimed at females and males ignored. Hell, everyday is international women's day since it's only ever women that get such attention and goodwill
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:27 PM
3

which denied and continues to deny them [women] equal status and opportunity Token platitude to not upset the feminists who will of course be upset for merely suggesting white men aren't evil
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:23 PM
3

That Kate in the comments is a right misandrist. She claims white men are privileged but offers no examples except that white men are hired more. Well there's no affirmative action for men that discriminates against non-white men. And studies recently have shown that employers have a bias against men and for women when gender is known. So it's not only a case of white men not being favoured but their the least favoured and she's claiming the completely opposite is the case because she's that ind…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:22 PM
3

With the wage gap having been constantly disproven and shown not to be discrimination or unequal pay it mystified me why they kept pushing the myth. The only explanation I could think of was that they wanted to secure women more money than men for the same work, but they couldn't come out and say that as it's unreasonable so they propagate the myth that women are paid less and women deserve to have the gap closed by being paid more and thus 'equal' to men. However since in reality the gap is an …
/r/MensRights16/07/17 11:06 AM
1

Well said
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:52 PM
1

Buzzfeed is the worst. They go on and on about sexism and objectification but have a weekly gallery of hot guys and run stories about dick size
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:50 PM
3

"There is no room for 'sexism' in sexual assault research [by ignoring male victims] And yet... Using a sample size of 11,860 adults in the United States (5,922 men and 5,938 women) obtained from the National Violence Against Women Survey's database The very name of the research group is sexist
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:56 PM
7

Upon mention of sexual harassment at work, it’s natural to think immediately of women as the targets It's not natural it's taught via feminist invasion of education, culture and government but actually men experience harassment too r/noshitsherlock A key finding was that men who said they engaged in more forms of feminist activism – for example, they attended meetings or signed a petition – also tended to report experiencing more sexual harassment, of both types Well obviously. If you support a …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:28 PM
23

It's always "men suffer most overal, but women suffer more in this specific area so we're gonna talk most about that"
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:22 PM
33

Moreover, it is only by recognising the reality of female sexual offending that the needs of those who offend can be properly addressed. “Female perpetration [of sexual aggression] is frequently intertwined with women’s past experience of their own victimisation”, the researchers said Needs? Their rapists, their needs are food, toilet and cage. Many men who offend were abused as kids but they get no sympathy or absolvement of their criminal actions because of this, neither should women
/r/MensRights11/07/17 08:01 PM
2

Excellent comment. "Violence Against Women And Girls" campaigns and laws are the result of the narrative
/r/MensRights11/07/17 07:54 PM
3

And most of the wars and murders and torture is committed against other men. The focus is only ever on men as the perpetrators and not as the victims of violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 07:44 PM
1

Mothers apparently use corporal punishment against their sons more than fathers do and they commit this against their sons far more than their daughters so It's possible that men learn violence from their mothers
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 07:40 PM
1

If it's down in he first 8 weeks then he's no abandoning a child he's leaving her to make the decision to go ahead with the pregnancy or not, she has this decision anyway but now she has to factor in if she is willing to take on the full responsibility that goes with her decision instead of relying on him
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 12:27 AM
25

Even without TRP, MRA gets a bad rep for two reasons Ingrained Gynocentrism and male disposability. We dare to suggest men have issues and inequalities in a society that dictate that only women experience these, therefore we're evil misogynists because we dare to disagree. Society hates us because we seek to help men whom society views as privileged and not in need of help Too much focus on feminism, which fuels the anti-woman label associated with us. Feminism is an obstacle towards men's issue…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:33 AM
2

Y'know if there was concrete scientific evidence that the rise in male suicide was directly linked to something like divorce courts or teachers bias against boys I bet that there'd be absolutely no change in practice or policy, because men's lives aren't worth changing women's comfort or privilege
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:24 AM
11

It's part of the narrative whenever cases like this come up to deny that they happen more often that they want to admit. They're scared of feminist reaction so they claim cases like these barely exist and to hell with securing justice for the falsely accused
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:20 AM
32

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) A former Alaska woman who was sexually abused by her paternal grandfather and then, as an adult, downloaded and traded videos of child exploitation has avoided any jail. http://archive.is/DUsZ7 Notice how they frame her as a victim to absolve her of responsibility of her crime? Typical I bet many men who were sent to prison for possessing child porn were also abused as kids but that's not an excuse for men is it
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:33 AM
8

Sadly it's not recognised as a thing by the government or justice system. There's tons of evidence of gender discrimination in treating male defendants harsher than female defendants yet they refuse to admit to it as they all follow feminist theory that decrees that women are victims and there's never any systemic sexism against men. That's the most frustrating thing about being red pilled IMO. It's knowing the inequalities in the justice system and male disposability in general but seeing socie…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 12:12 AM
9

The justice system and society in general treats women as incapable of evil. Even when blatant they try their best to rationalise their behaviour to excuse it in ways they wouldn't for a man. Society has a problem with treating women harshly, and this extends to criminal women. There's charities in the UK to close women's prisons completely and treat female criminals to small houses in a gate community. If the woman is a mother it's even worse. Even if in the dock for violent or abusive behaviou…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 12:08 AM
2

If there was groups for men and women they'd end up only working toward helping women. Men, more than women, need specific groups because non-specific groups that are for both sexes will invariably focus on the women since we live in a gynocentric society. I read about a university that wanted to set up a men's rights groups and were denied as they said the gender equality groups were for such issues but the gender equality groups all followed feminist theory of men as oppressors and would never…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 06:39 AM
2

...With a beer in one hand
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:59 AM
5

I can't agree. The smear of a false rape claim is horrendous and is incredibly damaging but the person knows their innocent and that knowledge can save them whereas a rape victim has that memory of being raped forever and can never escape that.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:49 AM
4

More men than women in government? Rational solution: feminist gets off her ass and runs for political office, making a case to the electorate as to why they should vote for her. Feminist solution: mandate that parties hand over safe seats to women candidates, regardless of how competent or otherwise they are. Yeah, like in the UK. The Labour Party has seats that are from women-only shortlists, so instead of men and women competing and the best selected to run for a seat they exclude men and hav…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:46 AM
36

Given the risk of marriage for men and the statistic that it's women who initiate divorce most I was often curious as the majority reason for the divorce. This seems to suggest it's the men not earning enough or being employed. I was wary of using the 'women initiate divorce most' argument as I figured it was due to domestic abuse but it seems women just get idle and don't stick with their men through better or worse
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:41 AM
5

He should stand in support of men's rights and not walk away and accept harrassment
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:36 AM
10

Ugh, he's so smug in his cucked support of feminism. why are you filming someone your arguing with? He should've answered for protection in case your attacked
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:35 AM
1

It never ceases to amaze me how they manage to absolve women of responsibility for anything
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:31 AM
11

What mystifies me is the end goal. How is pushing and prodding and manoeuvring women into STEM going to fix anything? What's broken? Women have equal opportunity and most choose against these careers, but so what? Feminism desperately wants equal numbers of men and women in STEM and in politics and CEOs and so forth but why? Is it just to so womankind has more power? How does this 1% of women in these positions of power help the 99% of women doing the daily grind? Is it that their patriarchy the…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:28 AM
9

This is what bugs me about feminism and society in general. Take Anita Sarkeesiens recent scandal. She claims she's the victim of harrassment while she harasses another. So not only is she not the victim in this instance but she's a perpetrator. But she gets people to believe that she's the victim. With STEM women are encouraged most yet they act as if it's the opposite in order to keep adding more and more programs for women to get ahead. It's like how we're told of how women are most victims o…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:22 AM
5

"Registering all our 18-year-old sons for the draft in the event the country needs more soldiers is as sexist as registering all our 18-year-old daughters for child-bearing in the event the country needs more children" - p. 130 Very poignant
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:15 AM
1

Whether an advert is sexist or just sexy will be decided upon by an expert set of judges. What a waste of money Adverts which would be verboten under the Left Party's watch include those that show beautiful women who are simultaneously “weak, hysterical, dumb, insane, naive, or completely controlled by their emotions.” So adverts won't be allowed to show women as human but only with positive traits. Women will have to be presented as perfect beings because reasons
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:10 AM
5

only 2 years. And she probably won't even serve that
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/17 01:34 AM
1

Is it privilege being less likely to be murdered? I mean it's a benefit but it's not something that society gives you that it doesn't give the opposite sex
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:24 AM
1

Yes, cheer him on until he's proved to have committed sexual misconduct, and only if that conduct is serious and not a 'he touched her shoulder without affirmative consent' crap
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:18 AM
1

Stop violence end of. This "stop violence against women" crap is so openly bias and sexist, especially since men suffer most violence overall
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:16 AM
3

Maybe I'm cynical but I'll believe it when I see results in action that the laws are being enforced equally as I have a sneaking suspicion that while the wording includes helping everyone, including men, the practice will remain the same
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:50 AM
0

Sorry but there was and still is a great deal of anger over this unlawful killing, but because the victim was black, not because he was male
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:48 AM
13

A male-stripper dies at their bachelorette party but unlike in the movies where this happens at bachelor parties (very bad things, Stag) the death is played for laughs and isn't a moral, ethical dilemma of secret-keeping
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:42 AM
18

Our younger selves were told boys are more important, watching mostly movies about men, directed by men, telling men’s stories. I guess I just never got that message. Bullshit. You weren't taught boys were more important, across the globe girls are treated better than boys. And aren't most movie-goers men? If so then them being men's stories makes sense and FYI making a movie bashing men isn't the smartest business decision.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:40 AM
14

The kids went in with knowledge that was truthful and left thinking that firefighters and pilots are mostly women. I get the idea behind this dreck, that girls being shown that their are women in these fields is a confidence booster that they too can be these things but the truth is these fields are filled mostly by men through choices men and women make and presenting a skewed reality where female firefighters are a rarity is lying to these kids. There's nothing that says to these girls that th…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:31 AM
12

That's such a blatant and generalist anti-male advert. It's Gotta be breaking some rules, or have they changed the rules to make Misandry except yet? And isn't the most physical abuse of kids by their mothers, and usually against boys more than girls?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:08 AM
2

Men are generally at the top (and bottom, though that's ignored) therefore their the scapegoat to blame the ills, but certainly not the benefits, of society on.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:06 AM
3

I don't like to think that for men to receive more help women will receive less but currently women receive too much and men too little so in the principle of equality Women's Issues will have to surrender their monopoly so that men and women are helped instead of just women. Feminism is about selfishness of "me, me, me" on an individual and "women, women, women" on a collective level. Their actions to retain this monopoly and dismissal of men's welfare show how selfish the ideology is.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:01 AM
1

It's about control. They don't want other exposed to multiple views where they can decide for themselves they want people only exposed to the one true view; Feminism, so that they can have control and power
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:58 AM
1

Because according to her and her ilk Men have to do the work of making female-movies. But when they do it has to be a certain way as their sexist pigs otherwise. It's like how feminism gets funding and campaigns and support from the patriarchy to get women into positions of power while ignoring that they get this support and ignoring that they often demand women be given jobs rather than the women earning them on an even playing field
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:56 AM
1

He's made other movies with female leads to. BFG and one in the seventies with Goldie Hawn. Her BS backfired big time
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:54 AM
2

This infuriated me. He asked how women are so oppressed and she was like "how dare you even suggest we're not" But what annoys me the most is the comments, all siding with her and using the "90% of CEOs are men" asserting that's because of discrimination with no evidence and no care for how 90% of miners and sewage workers are men too. And they blame him for her bursting into tears because he's not a lemming for her to manipulate but has a brain to discuss rather than blindly follow her opinions…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:50 AM
6

"Arent the inequalities bad when WE a face them"
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:45 AM
2

My nephew is in high school. He's of the idea that if you believe in equality you are a feminist
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:38 AM
3

I hate the theory that if it were men who had abortions that it would be legal, no questions, from day one. Since when has society ever let men completely off the hook for the responsibility? In reproduction men have no choice and a pregnancy means you do whatever she wants and have no say. In dating men had to pay and open doors and it was their responsibility to keep the woman happy In defence a man is required to serve if the shit hits the fan. If there's a homeless guy and a homeless woman t…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:36 AM
3

And yet they don't lament that Feminazi Misandrist Jess Philliios was voted back in
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:30 AM
2

And doesn't prostate cancer get much less government funding than breast cancer
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:27 AM
4

And the interest groups want to keep male victims of women a seperate from the stats as possible as including them undermines their narrative
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:26 AM
2

U.K. Law too. It's "sexual assault" and despite MPs assurance that it has the same maximum sentence it doesn't have the same minimum sentence and the minimum is only what women ever face. And I beleive I read a story, I think it was that one about the woman who "had a promos using career ahead of her" where the judge waived the minimum sentence completely
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:25 AM
11

Toxic masculinity is basically one big victim blame. It says that men are to blame for not speaking out about their issues and seeking help. Well did it ever occure to them that men don't seek help for a reason, because almost every support service is gendered for women? Keeping things stifled inside is a defence mechanism men instilled in order to face a world that doesn't give a shit about their issues. Look at what happened when these victims sought help If men suddenly overcame this toxic ma…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:16 AM
2

Because the justice system treats women as angelic innocents but men as devilish and guilty. Women are presumed never to lie about such things because they are viewed as incapable of evil
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:13 PM
3

New laws in the UK treat women as children by letting them give testimony via recorded video so they don't have to experience the court. It's the same thing that was designed so that children didnt face the ordeal of appearing in court. It's literally treating women as children but feminists and the like seem fine with it, when it suits them
/r/MensRights16/06/17 09:11 PM
7

As Dave Cullen pointed out, the man in this logo isn't even encroaching on anyone's space as the seat is empty
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:16 AM
38

A few years ago I saw a help wanted sign at a cafe, I went in asking how they'd like me to apply and was told the were only accepting applications from women
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:09 AM
0

Of course people don't always succumb to social pressures but many, perhaps most, do
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:07 PM
3

Ok I don't have statistical evidence but socially and culturally there's not much pressure or movement for men to become fathers as their is of women to become mothers so men likely are less interested until later than women
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:38 PM
8

What annoys me about this movie is Wonder Woman basically goes around slashing up only men yet in male-led superhero movies the male hero isn't even allowed to slap a villainess, they get a female hero to come in to fight her (The Wolverine, Gaurdians of the Galaxy, Batman & Robin) because it's not acceptable to show a male hero fighting a woman but if it's a female hero decimating the men it perfectly fine. I hate that double standard It's like on Vine and Instagram some female "comedians" like…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:34 PM
4

The amount of required empowerment for girls and women is so counter-productive because it advertises that men are strong without the need for encouragement or placating whereas women need all that support to be equals They basically say that women are weak and thus need empowerment
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:28 PM
3

The subconscious mind of the typical male moviegoer is crammed with heroic images of tough guys fighting for truth, justice and the American way. Er that's because it's mostly men who fight for such things, women rarely risk their safety so of course the majority of action heroes will be men. Females, still fighting for equal treatment in society, don’t see nearly as many tales of their own sex’s valor Oh really? The majority of unequal treatment is in women's favour at when men recieve no such …
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:25 PM
2

I know that but men generally want to wait more than women do. If men controlled things they'd wait until their late-twenties or early-thirties. Few would have kids in their twenties whereas women would as their more aware of their biological clock
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:09 PM
1

Patterns of behaviour is admissible in every court except rape trials. It seems records of people behaviour and activity is pertinent except this one court, because reasons. Courts shouldn't assume women don't have freaky consensual sex or fuck ugly dudes, but they do so demonstrate a bias wherein they agree it must be rape because 'she's too good' for such behaviour
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:36 AM
1

That's a good example. In such a case a woman would have visible injuries to her from consensual kink practices but if you deny her sexual proclivities from being brought up then the judge or jury has a woman with sexual injuries and no other explanation than rape whereas if they are brought up it can potentially explain that these injuries are not from the accused but from her sex life, thus reasonable doubt
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:33 AM
1

Same here (UK)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:15 AM
3

Thankfully most see through her cries of being a bullied victim of Trump because it's too obvious that she's the bully. But we are entertaining her victimhood whereas a man wouldn't even be allowed to claim he was the victim after such a stunt. He'd be condemned much more than she is for claiming victimhood
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:12 AM
0

See I'm conflicted about this issue. Men should have more options to decide when to become parents and less being forced into it, but if men in the west did have control then birth rates would plummet even further so we'd essentially be sacrificing western culture and races as the rest of the world would continue reproducing like crazy and thus outnumber us even more and they are not as free or equal in laws and culture so all the advancements we made would disappear with ua
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:10 AM
1

According to this doctor they already oppose it.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:08 AM
1

Tell her that you won't allow her to hit you again, that if she does you'll leave her. Do t say you'll report her or hit her back as she'll use this against you as "threats"
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:06 AM
1

What I can't stand is that whenever there's something like this (aka whoever women commit a crime and are judged leniently) the people in the comments remark about how men would receive no such sympathy or leniency. They know there's blatent sexism in courts that favour women and punish men and women unequally yet despite everyone knowing about this and being outraged about this nothing is ever done to punish women appropriately It's maddening
/r/PussyPass03/06/17 12:57 AM
1

Guilt is a male emotion that is a direct result of our instinct to take responsibility for our failures. We blame ourselves. We tell ourselves that it's our fault. We blame ourselves for things that aren't our fault. Men develop guilt complexes and become different people because of it. We sharpen our edges. We carry pain and guilt along with us every day. And it doesn't help that if your a white male your told you're to blame for everything wrong in the world. Repeated lectures about this can s…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 11:32 PM
2

For example, "Did you do anything fun this weekend?" "Well, no I didn't. I sat on my ass most of the day, did some laundry, went shopping, and hit the gym. But now your question is making me feel bad because I'm not living up to your implied expectation." Again lose-lose. Either I lie that I did something fun, which I feel bad about. Or I tell you I'm a boring fuck, which I also feel bad about. All I know is, before we started talking I felt good and now because of your seemingly innocent questi…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/17 11:28 PM
3

And they don't see the irony of men supporting and funding their website while they preach against the oppressive males
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:29 PM
1

Males are statistically more likely to be assaulted by a stranger, yet we're all raised to have concern for females safety in public over males
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:28 PM
5

Women tend to have a halo effect where they're presumed never to do any bad things. I read something earlier about how there's great concern for kids being seperated from their mothers when the they go to prison. It assumes their good mothers when in reality much of the time it's a relief for the kids to be rid of her, but even a woman sent to prison for a serious crime she is presumed to be a good person
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:27 PM
2

Brad Koffel said he's defending more and more cases of sex between teenagers leading to criminal charges. He considers it consensual sex that later becomes "regret" sex Thanks Feminism
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:24 PM
1

She's been so indoctrinated that she takes it as an insult to dare suggest that men have hardships. There's a study where men rang abuse helplines and tha majority were turned away to either programmes for abusers or were told their "takin the issue from women"
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:16 PM
3

Some women would rather ruin your life then admit they cheated on their boyfriend Infidelity and covering it up is the number one reason for false rape accusations. Fortunately many women recant a few weeks later to prevent incarceration but the fact that these women wilfully destroy a mans reputation and put his safety at risk with little concern is fucking shockingly sociopathic. It speaks to their attitudes to men
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 09:01 PM
1

It's sad that they never place any responsibility on the women, it's always something or someone else's fault. I feel bad for young girls, their being raised to never take accountability for their actions, their being raised to either be treated as victims or be treated as children. They'll grow up to be entitled brats that never grow as people to be independent but to be a controlled and manipulated demographic. That's sexism IMO. Modern equality groups are going full regressive and raising a g…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 08:48 PM
2

It could also be said that if your not upset by this then your sleepwalking into more sever inequality down the road.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/17 08:37 PM
3

Firstly, Welcome. It's great to see women here who care about men's welfare. I agree on most of what you said but regarding this... Toxic normative values that tell men it's not okay to ask for help, that it's pathetic to be depressed, and that they are effectively worthless if they aren't successful in their careers... need to change. Masculinity is a really complex thing, and I don't pretend to understand it because it's not my lived experience, but I think society as a whole needs to be more …
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:32 AM
2

I'd say suicide. It's the biggest killer of men under 45. The investigation about it seems confined to toxic masculinity, and how men don't seek help, but IMO this is an attitude that developed from looking around and seeing no help for men. Men naturally didn't bother seeking help because nearly every issue has been gendered towards helping women and children first and men last, if at all, so men saw this and developed a stoic attitude of resigning themselves to their fate of being disposable. …
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:19 AM
3

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/2017-conservative-manifesto-in-full/
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:18 PM
20

I think it's because their taught that women matter and men don't. Many dont even realise they have these attitudes
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:33 PM
8

I read a study where the main reason given for women making false rape reports was that they cheated and didn't want to face the repercussions of their actions. The second most given answer was they didn't want people thinking they were a slut or hearing that she was into sex with this particular guy so she lies., this girl seems to fall into the latter Most of the time the women retract their accusations but only after a week or two and little seemed to care about how the whole thing affected t…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:32 PM
2

Part of the victim mentality maintains that working hard on self-improvement and/or fighting to reach their goals is pointless because of the oppressor just waiting to strike them down.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 04:58 PM
4

How about we teach men that killing/raping/abusing is evil and there are heavy consequences for it? We do and as such the vast majority of men don't commit such actions. There will always be people who cannot be taught, they know what they're doing is evil and wrong but don't care, no amount of shaming the majority of men will change the actions of the minority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 04:52 PM
1

Feminism helped put in place bias harassment laws and domestic abuse laws. Added a word to make your post more accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 04:49 PM
12

So I guess men's issues being ignored and men's continued suffering in suicide and homelessness and documented sexism in the courts just doesn't count as dehumanising and marginalising men
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:28 PM
1

She basically absolves the rapist of all responsibility. Disgusting
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:20 PM
1

I got confused because they mentioned 9.4% gap in full time pay then didn't have full-time hours mentioned under reasons for the gap. If there's 9.4% between full-time males and full-time females the that 9.4% must solely be to do with occupational differences and less women in full time because they don't mention any other reason
/r/MensRights28/04/17 07:39 AM
1

The USU said the film was “rooted in an ideology which ultimately dehumanises women, seeing them merely as sex objects who exist primarily to purposefully negatively impact the lives of men”, saying it had the “capacity to intimidate and physically threaten women on campus”. How can a documentary physically threaten a woman? Will it have a pointing finger yelling "you, yeah you woman, I'm gonna find you and hurt you? Cos that's the only way it can threaten women ands that's not physically
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:14 AM
2

They basically want masculinity outlawed at this point
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:12 AM
2

This means average pay for full-time female employees was 9.4% lower than for full-time male employees. The main factors explaining why women tend to earn less than men are: part-time work So according to them the reason women full-time work women are paid less than men is because of part-time work? How can part-time work affect full-time pay gap they propose?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:09 AM
1

Feminists will block the usage to allow abortions to be prevented when a father wants the baby and she doesn't and this tech allows that. And men in power will go along with them as they always do
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:03 AM
2

So instead of punishing female criminals just append the law to suit them?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:01 AM
26

Asking feminism to stop blaming men is like asking religious people not to believe in sin or god
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:59 AM
1

If I rent it can I gives friend my account details to have a watch before the expiry or is there some restriction to prevent that?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:58 AM
7

Like THIS guy who knows he'll be arrested if he calls it in
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:53 AM
11

There was a poster on a posterboard at the London hospital I visited today about FGM. I'd estimate that it's far too rare in the UK to be an issue and if it's not then there's a clear idea why it's increased yet I doubt they'll say it
/r/MensRights27/04/17 01:52 AM
1

Exactly. They conflate the 1% of men with power to the 99% without.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 07:34 PM
2

Poor bastard is afraid to defend himself because he knows he'll be arrested instead of her. There's some male privilege for you
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:48 AM
1

The papers in the UK are writing articles as if he has already been found guilty. She's referee to as victims instead of alleged victims and the text where they use the word 'claim' is tiny compared to the big huge 'he did this, he did that' with no 'alleged' featured
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:31 AM
8

Clay Jones, with White Ribbon, a group that encourages men to become involved in fighting violence against women But not in fighting violence against those who suffer most from violence it seems
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:24 AM
5

the rules will relate only to children and other vulnerable witnesses, he said. Hmm. 'Vulnerable witnesses' sounds like very vague terminology used hide that they mean that women can be excused from cross-examination if their emotional state is deemed too much
/r/MensRights07/04/17 05:13 AM
3

They don't want women to have to prove they were raped. So any woman can make the claim and get the free benefits without any checking is what they want
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:55 PM
3

And of course children who were conceived by women who raped men aren applicable because consent is only factored in for women. So if a guy who is forced into having sex where the woman gets pregnant wants his child to recieve these benefits, he can't
/r/MensRights06/04/17 08:55 PM
12

I find it insulting that characters started by white guy's as white characters have to all change so people of colour and so forth am have an easier way in to representation than them creating their own comic companies and characters from scratch. It's the easy route of piggybacking on others success than the hard effort of starting from the bottom and making the new character popular.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 08:14 PM
14

It's not a wage gap. It's an earnings gap. Wage gap can imply women are getting less in their wage packet than men for the same hours worked which is incorrect whereas 'Earnings gap' has no margin for such implications as it's about what your earn, as in what you're paid based on how much you work
/r/PussyPassDenied06/04/17 08:08 PM
7

Since when is "disinterest" the same as "blocked?" If the disinterest is being manufactured. I doubt they'd poll thousands of men to ask if they want more contraception, because they know the answer would be a majority yes. Theyre likely presuming men don't want this so they can blame men for them burying it. It'll be women's interest groups that prevent this from coming to market so as not to lose their monopoly on procreation. If men had more options to prevent unwanted pregnancies then there'…
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 07:59 PM
6

The red pill is also used for the theory of being awoken to reality and the way society works that is hidden via indoctrination into Liberia feminist lies. It's an apt title
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 07:42 PM
2

That's a surprisingly unbias article
/r/MGTOW01/04/17 07:35 PM
1

She pulled over and called the police. She didn't ignore it. She may not have acted quick enough but she didn't ignore it. The fact of the matter is this monster raped this poor little boy. He is more despicable and responsible than her
/r/MGTOW01/04/17 07:26 PM
1

Even the charity Inquest has a specific section for highlighting how the minority of deaths in prison deserve special consideration and empathy http://www.inquest.org.uk/issues/deaths-of-women
/r/MGTOW01/04/17 06:10 AM
2

hatever women have they feel it should be exclusively theirs. Whatever men have women feel they should have half. Exactly. Look at Superheroes. It's traditionally been a male demographic but they can't have that so there's a big push for more female superheroes now Look at Lego. While it was favoured by boys it's a unisex product but now there's the friends and elves and superhero girls line to exclusively market to girls. There's the pink aisle in the toyshop and unisex aisle in the toyshop Boy…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 05:16 AM
1

The seperation from the kids is agonising, but only when it affects them because of course when fathers are kicked out of their kids lives their feelings matter not
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 05:04 AM
7

Mrs Owens, however, commenced a brief intimate relationship with another man, Ted Olive, in November 2012. They're so obvious in their dismissive absolvement of her actions.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 05:02 AM
5

Sadly a wife can do absolutely nothing and still be considered entitled to half of the rewards of his toil by merely being married to him, as if that somehow increases his success automatically
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 04:59 AM
3

Not according to the Kinsey Confidentials definition of sexual Harrassment "If you feel objectified, uncomfortable, cornered, afraid, awkward or anything else on the broad spectrum of negative feelings, you have just been sexually harassed. The intentions of the person making the comment or gesture are irrelevant in the light of your feelings. Whether they meant to, whether their intentions were to compliment, whether they were ignorant to social niceties, does not matter: if YOU are bothered, i…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 04:50 AM
1

My point wasn't about the motive behind women calling each other sluts it's that they do to denigrate other women. Same as men who tell other men to 'man up' is denigrating them. Both are acting harsh to a member of the same sex yet only one is attributed to gender traits while the other isn't
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:03 AM
2

Like what?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:28 PM
2

But there are areas where men face institutional sexism where women don't, in those cases they can be fixed by fixing one side. For example the sentencing gap
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:27 PM
1

You could add one more scale at the bottom of systemic institutionalised sexism and show the reality that men have more of the wheras the issues women have are pretty much exclusively social. For instance the sentencing gap and family court and awareness of issues bias, lack of reproductive rights are institutional governmental sexism against men wheras "rape culture" and harassment and body image issues and such are social issues not institutionalised sexism
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:25 PM
10

I can't stand how that when it comes to false allegations they only ever think of how it will affect other real rape victims and just ignore how it affects the falsely accused
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:21 PM
3

It's the it between 4-8% of cases? And I'm pretty sure I read an article that combined all of the studies to find it was closer to 10%
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:13 PM
15

Those are bad things but why attribute them to masculinity? Women calling each other sluts isn't blamed on hyperfemininity and plenty of men aren't masculine but use these phrases. Attributing them to masculinity is done to IMO to shame masculinity and no one ever talks about good masculinity only bad masculinity
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:10 PM
1

And I just bet it only applies if a male says it and not when another woman says it
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:06 PM
1

Feminists outright deny that female privilege exists Ironically they say that men who deny their privilege are just blind to it. Convenient that they don't apply that same argument to themselves
/r/becomeaman27/03/17 06:58 PM
6

I think the suicide rate disparity is that once a man leaves home the only emotional support he'll get is from a devoted partner, which is rare. Whereas women will get more support from their parents once their adults than men, have a closer emotional bond with their social circle that encourages airing their issues, have a much bigger acceptance and encouragement of opening up about their issues and will be supported more by the state what with almost every gendered charity being for women and …
/r/becomeaman27/03/17 06:22 PM
1

This guy explains what will happen https://youtu.be/JymN5yu-K_o There's also this method https://youtu.be/nIsz2BeI0No, which is very promising but won't be permitted because equality in procreation doesn't exist, it's only allowed for women to have a say
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 08:29 PM
1

Is abortion legal? If so the whole "my body my choice" crap only applies to women
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 08:26 PM
1

Feminism wants women to retain sole control over procreation. They can trick men Ito getting them pregnant then the state will force them to pay. Even if conception was through her statutory raping him he still has to pay, even if he used condoms and she fetched it out of the trash and put it inside her he still has to pay. And when it comes to reproductive rights women decide if the child is born or terminated with the man having no say either ways. So they control procreation 100%. Atm if a wo…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/17 08:23 PM
6

All it says is that the structures and modes of society are more likely to favor you than a female Like how women-only short-lists that use positive discrimination favours men? Or how the Duluth model favours men? Or how the sentencing gap favours men? or how healthcare funding disparity favours men? Or how the constant talk of the disproven wage gap favours men? Or how the amount of shelters and charities for domestic abuse victims favours men? Or how the draft favours men? Or how unequal repro…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:48 PM
4

So you dismiss people's arguments by saying they have to put up with sources or shut up then when someone asked you to back up your claims you ignore your own position of having to back up statements because the shoes on the other foot
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:45 PM
2

Patriarchal theory ignores societal benefits women get over men as it sees only men as being treated well. Patriarchy by definition is men in the position of power and influence. It doesn't mean such power is used exclusively for the betterment of men but that is how patriarchal theory operates. The reality is society is gynocentric and always places women's wellbeing over men. If society was pro-man and anti-woman then something could be said of removing the patriarchy but as it stands patriarc…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:42 PM
5

How has society "shit on men". Almost all of social care is gendered towards women over men. Men make up the majority victims of violence and homicide yet feminism has made it so that the awareness and campaigns and charities and acts and laws for ending violence are for ending it against women. Thi goes for pretty much everything where men suffer more or equally to women. Men die more from cancer yet get less funding than women's cancers. The media re-enforces providing more empathy for women t…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:33 PM
12

That paragraph is so insulting. it downplays men's issues as not as severe when many of men's issues are life and death issues vs women's comfort and social issues
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:13 PM
19

Modern feminism loves inequality when it favours them, they see it as a victory for rape survivors not a system that treats women as children unable to stand up for their claim
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:42 PM
2

I went to apply for a wait staff job and the guy said they're looking for a woman, I replied how this is an equal opportunity country and he just shrugged
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:40 PM
2

The changes include a demand from one of the most senior family court judges for all the judiciary to have further training on domestic violence and to act to ensure women and children are protected. "Equality" Why should men be protected from their violent or abusive girlfriends/wives
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:28 PM
2

And once again it sticks to just violent fathers and ignores violent mothers. So a violent mother has all the rights to see her children but a violent dad doesnt
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:23 PM
2

dentified that 19 children have been killed in the last 10 years by their violent fathers after being given contact with them by judges. So the vast vast majority of children were not killed when kept in contact with their violent fathers. In theory it's a nice idea but one cannot and shouldn't conflate violence a man does to others with violence on his children. My dad was a violent man but he never touched me with harm
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:22 PM
2

So basically it could be as simple as doing this on all men and no more unwanted pregnancies. It would make abortion obsolete and since it's easily reversible it would mean control of when they want kids. It's clear it won't happen as it would give men reproductive rights and stop them having to be forced to have and/or pay for kids they don't choose to have and it would remove Women sole control procreation with abortion. Abortion presented as a women's only issue despite affecting men and so t…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:17 PM
3

... Yet still remains in the modern world as men are taught to help women over men rather than both equally
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:08 PM
5

Either way it would do something to show we have issues too that need attention
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:07 PM
9

While it won't change anything it's a big show of female empowerment. It would be a good thing if this was done in the east but here in the west it translates to "We still consider women to be treated unequally despite the facts" and it shows how many women are taken in by feminist lies
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:04 PM
12

They seem to be protesting against trumps pussy quote mostly. A show of nit tolerating such language/actions. But some are protesting for women's rights while not realising they have equal rights, even more than men do
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:02 PM
13

Same with them praising the various "End Violence against Women" laws and campaigns that prioritises female victims over men, who are the majority victim of violence. I saw a post in r/aww with a dog wearing costume saying "end sexual violence" and questioned 'why be so specific, why not platform against all violence?" And got downvoted because apparently only fixing it so female victims are reduced and leaving it so male victim victims aren't is the correct attitude. It might as well have read …
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:01 PM
13

I find it sad. Sad that men aren't assembled so easily in so great numbers to fight for issues affine them, real issues like the sexism of the courts, reproductive rights, showing support to reduce male suicide rates ect. They have a sisterhood and even if misplaced will stand up for their gender. We don't seem to have any motivation to stand and protest for other men
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:57 PM
3

My point is that the kind of man who, upon finding out his partner is pregnant with his child, urges her to get an abortion--is not father material. He is putting his needs above that of his child. Pretty much exactly what abortion is when not medically necessary or due to rape. It's the people's wish to undue a mistake they made so as to preserve their lifestyles, it's by this definition selfish
/r/RedPillWomen10/12/16 06:43 PM
5

It is a very strange world where a father can just walk off with no consequences. Men have no legal rights to do this. If he conceives a child then he's stuck with whatever choice the woman makes so if he wants the child and she doesn't he has no say end loses the child, if he doesn't want the child and she does then he's forced to pay child support for 18 years. She however can abort, give the child up for adoption (with the father having no rights to object) or legally abandon the child. So wo…
/r/RedPillWomen10/12/16 06:37 PM
25

I had an appointment for a scan. Picture a long halls with doors dividing it. The men's changing area was the through some double doors on the left, The women's behind some doors that said "no men beyond this point unless accompanied by a member of staff" and to the left behind some more doors. So to get to the women's the women have walk past the doors to the men's changing areas, go through some doors with that message and through some doors to the their left. So women can walk past the men's …
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:30 PM
1

Promoting that we discriminate men on the basis of gender, in the interest of 'equality' Shameful
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:23 PM
3

See I hate thinking that's the truth. Partly because it's a bad image in my mind of women lying and not caring about the men they accuse which I don't like but it makes me doubt rape victims which again I don't like as I'd like to think most would be telling the truth and those who lie aren't this active.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:20 PM
5

The problem with believing women wholeheartedly is that to do so is to automatically beleive the man is guilty. It's classic gynocentrism. If things were equal a claimant would be beleived until they accuse a specific person and at that point the authorities take a neutral stance and investigate and let the facts be the guiding light to forming a view. Sadly investigation and fact checking is considered anti-women as feminism has made it that a woman's word alone should be taken as gospel and du…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:17 PM
5

Done. Thanks for posting the details. They hopefully will remove this bias advert and replace it with a non-gendered one. Edit: I spoke with my nephew about this and was saddened to hear that he didn't think raising awareness for non-gendered issues as women's issues was wrong. He thinks hitting men is wrong but not as wrong as hitting women. That is deemed worse in his mind. He claims to be a feminist, though it's the "I believe in equality so I'm a feminist" version not the actual reality of f…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:09 PM
1

Which the show even proves. After all they only use violence against men. They went after sorority girls who used abusive hazing against women (as only women can be victims) but they didn't beat the crap out of them, they reserve that just for men
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:54 PM
1

Advocating vigilante justice only against one gender and against one crime. It's as sexist as you get
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:52 PM
3

So they basically hunt men accused of rape and assault them. They murdered one before his trial and according to the propaganda if a man is tried and found not guilty then he's still guilty it's just the system failed and there's no possible way that he's actually innocent. It's disgusting such blatant misandrist propaganda is permitted. Bet they don't hunt female rapists and beat the ever loving crap out of them, nope it's just revenge porn for women
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:51 PM
11

Haha. She did exactly what he said feminists do just moments after he said it. That they fall back on the out of date definition to cover their Misandry
/r/MensRights19/11/16 07:24 PM
11

It's okay when Women interrupt Men. It's only 'wrong' when Men interrupt Women
/r/MensRights19/11/16 07:21 PM
1

Police say the woman, who they did not identify, admitted she fabricated the entire event. So if a guy is accused his name is released but if a woman lies about it she's protected
/r/MensRights19/11/16 07:16 PM
3

. From my point of view as a dentist, roughly 40% of head and neck cancers are caused by the virus. More men get head and neck cancer than women, so why are we not vaccinating boys as well as girls? It is long overdue Excellent point. There is no reason not to vaccinate if there is one available Richard Arkless (Dumfries and Galloway) (SNP) Despite the obvious sense of many of the contributions, I feel slightly uncomfortable with the subject of this debate. Although I recognise differentials in …
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:08 PM
1

Shameful stance that is obviously done to fuel the narrative of Women as the only victims and Men as the only perpetrators of domestic abuse
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:45 PM
1

It encourages segregation and makes a bigger divide between the sexes. Instead of Women learning to exercise alongside Men it teaches them to flee to a 'safe space' devoid of Men which will instil in them the idea that all Men at Gyms are pervs rather than the minority of Men
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:43 PM
3

So she basically got her job from a selection of the best women not the best person for the job. She got her job from a system that discriminates men so as to force more representation of Women
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:40 PM
1

You make a good point. The issue has awareness but no desire to look into the root cause. IMO the root cause is women having a monopoly on support and men left to deal with stuff alone, men being told their the cause of anything that's wrong or unjust, men being told they're privileged and being stripped of their right to voice their opinions, Single Mother parenting being celebrated and men being considered unnecessary once the sperm leaves he sack, Feminism and societies vilification of mascul…
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:09 PM
2

Do as I do. Believe them, until the point the finger and accuse a specific person. At that point take a neutral stance and advocate for the evidence and facts to make your decision. That's the way the law is supposed to work
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:03 PM
1

At least they didn't blame men for it. I think personally that it's closer to equal in girls and boys. Boys just aren't permitted by society to be victims as much as girls and girls are taught to be more open about their problems than boys
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:57 PM
2

I hate how any industry or thing where women aren't on equal numbers to men is assumed to be because of sexism. Labour Party has affirmative action that discriminates men so women are given, rather than earn, diversity.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:54 PM
0

The men have been cucked. They're afraid to speak for Men because the very society they perpetuate in stills the idea that it's anti-women. This is reinforced by the shrews there who claim that everyday is men's day and men don't need help Even in the debate when women interrupt a man its fine but if a man does it to her he's 'mansplaining' and chastised for it.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:53 PM
4

Huffpost had a terrible article dismissing men's issues by insulting the person who brought them forward and by stating women's issues which revolves about representation while the men's ones were about death and injustice
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:39 PM
1

Their resentful because of the institutionalised sexism against fathers and men going through a divorce. That's the enemy, not the men who are angry about it. Fix the system to not be bias and for equality to mean equal treatment for men and women rather than equal treatment for women and the men won't be resentful or bitter
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:50 AM
2

Trump seems to be the only candidate under such scrutiny by the media. Clinton is getting half the amount of articles digging into her past comments
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:43 AM
4

Do you understand what bravado is? In short it means saying things to win the approval of acceptance of others but the things you say aren't to be taken literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:40 AM
1

I think it's because People have more value on their sexual desirability than most other aspects of themselves. Sexual desirability after all is what will secure you a companion so it's above other traits, which generally won't
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:38 AM
1

The ironic thing about that quote is it states that women desire masculinity but the movement on the whole seem anti-masculinity. So in a sense they want men to be less masculine and thus less desirable to women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:32 AM
2

The second quote just highlights who feminism has turned men fearful of women. So afraid of doing or saying anything that may cause offence that they just end up alone because it's too much work to navigate the minefield as they've added more traps and decoys to make the whole thing even harder for men
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:29 AM
-1

Aptly put.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 06:46 AM
5

Consent within feminism has IMO gone beyond consent and into men being rapists unless they check-in about every single action and the woman being a rape victim unless she gives verbal consent to every action. And that's not even getting into how one-sided it's becoming with men having to get it from women but never the reverse. It would be so much easier if women just gave consent without waiting to be asked or implied consent but not actually giving it verbally. If they simply said "yes I want …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 06:40 AM
2

Ideologies are only ever corrupted by their members. People can be assholes, ideas can't. So people get behind an idea and mantra but in the end it's the assholes who end up representing the membership while the mantra is retained and spouted by the most devout as a defence for the membership. Happens with almost all movements
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 06:27 AM
1

Can they really get much satisfaction being just another customer of hers though?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 03:06 PM
1

Fair enough, we have different estimates, It's all just theory anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 09:23 AM
1

That seems a generalisation. Some likely do meet women but have had bad experiences so do buy but stopped buying
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 09:21 AM
1

Well I wouldn't say most women, just that without societal judgements I think the % of women would be closer to the % of men who like casual sex. So if 40% of men liked casual sex, that around 30-40% of women would also, if societal judgements weren't there
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:34 AM
1

Well it's all part of the ideology, it's just that the complaining is the majority and the self-improvement the minority. I was attracted to it due to the idea of improving yourself and your way with women, but found that not as frequent as the rest, and wasn't a fan of the terminology they use
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:32 AM
1

These people want the 'women are simply interchangeable sex objects and I have all the power' to be true so badly (and it never will be - neither will the reverse) Well by this as neither has all the power, so if neither has all the power, the power is equal
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:29 AM
3

Men are at constant responsibility to pursue women and risk rejection while women just have to say no to advances, this dichotomy is one of many that shows men have to do the work and the woman has to just agree to it. Many men as a result get tired of chasing and seek to accept their loneliness rather than sit and feel like a failure because they weren't good enough for the women who reject them. Constant rejection leads to feeling shitty, women don't face reflection anywhere near the level tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:10 AM
3

I'd say yes, Part of it seems to be like a support group and at a support group you talk about the thing your giving up to help keep on track. So you can talk about something while not partaking in it. It's also about action, even if they talk about women all the time their actions would still be to abstain from being in relationships with them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:08 AM
1

I think the ideology isn't just about going their own way but taking pride in that it's expanding and as a result will get revenge on women who use sexist societal systems to screw men over. I personally am okay with that if it were to work to bring down such systems but I feel it's naive to think enough men will GTOW to do so. But if they wish to I see no issue with it. It's like people who boycott a movie on principle. They're speaking with their wallets, which is all they can do, but in the e…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 02:05 AM
0

Just to check, you mean they generalise all women, give them up and as a result miss out on the good women out there? I'm not too familiar with their ideology but I believe it stems much like the way patriarchy is for Feminism, that society gives women superior treatment and as such it's not worth marrying due to the sexism of divorce and custody courts and the lack of reproductive rights for men that make things unequal in favour of women. So by going by that all women benefit from the same sys…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:59 AM
3

Maybe it's like a support group. They're getting over their 'addiction' to women, so talk with other recovering addicts to not fall off the wagon
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:53 AM
1

People shouldn't care. If people can accept men becoming women and reverse and homosexuality and bisexuality and all this gender-fluid stuff then why not accept men who don't want to settle down because they feel the benefit isn't worth the cost?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:52 AM
2

What about when strange women over the Internet comment things like "I want to be you you're so perfect"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:46 AM
1

I don't see the appeal in slobbering compliments over women on social media. To me their attractive but some of the comments are so cringey, like "i want to be you your so perfect" and "please marry me" " it would make my year if you messaged back". It comes across as men and women placing these female social media celebrities on a pedestal and requesting a lick of her boot do of course as a result the women will have inflated egos dos everyone is lavishing praise on them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:44 AM
3

And yet more and more women elect to raise kids alone nowadays. So there's the fatherless homes from men who bugger off (initially or after divorce), fatherless homes from women who have kids alone and fatherless homes from women who prevent men from seeing their kids after the breakdown of the relationship. And fatherless homes is the top trait criminals share. So fatherless homes are of detriment to society. That's why we need equality in family courts to prevent decent dads from being exclude…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:41 AM
2

Well the woman in the example kept going giving the first guy chances rather than leaving right away. Then she again went out with abusive guys and then applied her own men selection to all men rather than looking at the type of men she was involved with and being introspective. Then she she goes for guys with looks and swag and is surprised that basically the same men she's again choosing are bad for her and to top it off dumps the good ones. So the above is of a woman choosing assholes and ref…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:38 AM
1

man dates hot sexy alpha male player (who happens to be a bad person) He uses her, cheats on her,mistreats her She gives the guy dozens of chances and he still mistreats her. She finally finds the courage to leave him This process happens 1 or more times until she's fed up. Now as a defense mechanism, she's very skeptical of all men From what I understand alphas play the field and don't get into relationships, you can't cheat on someone you're not in a relationship with If she gives him chances …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:33 AM
2

You do you, I'll do me, and so long as neither of us harms others it's all good. 👍🏻 Sadly different groups keep telling people to be different to what they are as the way they are offends these groups, and they love to make new ways that other people's behaviours now offend them and these others must change that too now and the next thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:23 AM
1

Enablers of what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:17 AM
7

Yeah I never understood this. I see loads of Instagram women who have a patreon and are basically solo pornstars selling their body over the Internet and men pay them. This I can somewhat understand but some just send nude pics and have an account men pay into. Why would men do this when there's millions of naked women on the Internet for free to look at? Why pay this woman for a weak service when you can see so much more elsewhere for free. And what's the deal with women who don't even offer an…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:16 AM
1

I don't agree with the women are for fucking as there for more than that imo but I do agree with the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:12 AM
1

I'd say women want it as much as men but are judge more for it so don't practice it as much as they'd like. If they could without judgement they'd be shagging as much
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:12 AM
1

So you're saying neither gender has an advantage in the dating game over the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:10 AM
1

The red pill is not about doing the right thing and treating women like they'd like to be treated. Actually from the little material I've read of them they cite various research that women say they want nice and empathy ect and caring men but then go shag the assholes who treat them like objects. In short what women want is to be dominated and such but they say they want to be treated differently to that. So technically they do treat women in the way some like to be treated. On Instagram I'm con…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:08 AM
2

they can become more powerful by becoming more attractive That's a big part of it. A main segment is about increasing your sexual market value as they put it, which means being more fashionable & working on your body and taking pride in it, taking pride in your hobbies and interests and becoming more confident in yourself overall
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 01:01 AM
1

Becoming so badass that you have your pick of women, such that no one particular woman is unique or special. They're all replaceable. Women's liberation has done this too. Women post about how they use men for free drinks while they wait for a man they're actually interested in to come along. There's the whole "if you can't handle men at my worst you don't deserve me at my best" thing that enables them to treat a man poorly because they deserve a better man, one who can take the high-maintenance…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 12:54 AM
1

I am genuinely interested in understanding why men who believe in TRP seem to degrade women and speak about them like they are nothing but objects It's probably an 'I'm gonna do to your gender what you do to mine' response to men constantly seen as nothing but oppressors. There's likely not a single women's issue that isn't blamed on patriarchy aka men. Even when studies show that women slut-shame more than men it's still men who are the ones Anti-slut shaming is aimed at and thus its men who ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/16 12:50 AM
1

The only evidence you linked to is of treating women like children when women act like children, not treating women who don't act like children as children. I read a 'women are children' piece a while ago and initially I found the idea incredible sexist but as I read the examples, one was a woman always forgetting her keys and getting angry so the SO would just take over the responsibility of having the keys when they went out to prevent tantrums, and some of the psychology about it, I agreed. O…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:49 PM
2

I figure initial attraction is a mixture of: Physical attractiveness Income Body Language Fashion sense Humour/Attitude Personality Long term attraction: Personality Humour/Attitude Physical attractiveness Income Fashion sense Body language
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:40 PM
3

No, but some women would
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:37 PM
2

That's it in a nutshell. But these days the responsibility is placed all on the men. They're taught to ask consent rather than it being a shared responsibility, theyre taught not to ever hit a woman even in self-defence but women aren't taught he same and feminism wants men to be taught not to rape (even though they are) not for women to also be taught to avoid the risks that could lead to rape. It's all on the men to be responsible and never on the women
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:30 PM
1

Agreed. Sadly many groups are angry and take the reverse stance of wanting to lock away people without trial and encouraging people not to take precautions under the lrinciple that such crimes shouldn't happen. They treat rape prevention advice as victim blaming and thus teach women not to be accountable for their decisions and actions
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:24 PM
1

The thing is, how much sympathy should we have for someone who made a poor decision, like making themselves this vulnerable? I can understand if they were ignorant of their circumstances, but the police, parents and society do provide warnings about this sort of stuff. I think sympathy is deserved as they suffered but it's no unsympathetic IMO to point out the fact that the victim made his or herself vulnerable and that's on them. Sadly with rape, feminism has created a situation where nobody is…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:20 PM
1

And immediately jumping to bring up how the victim could have prevented the attack is victim blaming. No it's not. Saying she couldve avoided being raped via different decisions and actions is saying she is responsible for her actions not the actions of the a rapist. If someone said she was to blame for being raped or she deserves it or she flirted and therefore encouraged it then that is victim blaming at its blaming her for the actions of the rapist. That's completely different to saying that …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:15 PM
4

The problem arises then from people taking risks and ignoring advice and then expecting not to be told they took risks and avoided advice which resulted in them being accountable, NOT to blame but accountable for their becoming a victim. Accountability and blame being considered the same is what it comes down to. If a person leaves their car door unlocked and open and it's stolen we say their accountable for increasing the chances of the car being stolen but we don't say they're to blame for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:10 PM
2

Unfortunately that would be controlling them from their own choices and actions and that's not right so the only options can be to encourage them not to take risks or give up and let them take the risks and if they fall prey to say 'this is why we told you to avoid these risks'
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:07 PM
1

Because some feminists advocate for women not to be held responsibile for their actions and refuse to understand that a victim can be accountable and that this isn't the same as blaming them. The actions of the rapist are solely on the rapist. By the same note the actions of the victim are solely on the victim and that includes knowing the risks and taking the course of actions anyway such as going through that dark alley alone in a high-crime area. Telling someone to take precautions is not say…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/16 02:05 PM
1

Thanks for the clarification. I agree with her.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:31 PM
3

Highlights: Men are more likely to be the victim of personal crime by 0.3% Men are more likely to be the overall victim of violent crime Men are far more likely to convicted by a Jury than Women Men are overall the perpetrators of crime than women Men are more likely to be sentenced to immediate custody All mitigating factors are applied to Women more than Men Men serve almost double the amount of time in jail than Women Men are are likely to commit self-harm in prison (yet a proposal after the …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:06 PM
1

If I feel like an elephant then I am am biologically an elephant.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:55 PM
6

Same happens with privilege. They scorn men for denying their male privilege but will themselves deny their female privilege and not see the hypocrisy
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:34 PM
8

It's entitlement at its finest. Complete refusal of cause and affect by demanding to carry on the cause and dictate the affect can't be so and insist the affect be altered rather than the cause which is much harder to implement
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:33 PM
2

So basically have no rules imposed on one sex by the other?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:30 PM
3

Could you please elaborate on what she got angry that was a thing?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:29 PM
10

And those pedophile sisters were spared jail entirely for sexually abusing a six year old boy. Guess female pedophiles only go to jail when their victim is female
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:29 AM
5

It's all about paying women to have babies. As it is when women take time off work BY CHOICE to have kids they lose out on promotions and money, by choice. So they want the government to give women free money when taking time off to have kids to 'keep things equal' Basically it's absolving women responsibility for their Choices and rewarding them either way
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:03 AM
1

I'd love to ask them what they propose to replace patriarchy after they destroyed it. Bet they wouldn't have a clue
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:00 AM
2

Common trait of all those is the person voluntarily drinks the tea and takes no responsibility for their action of drinking the tea
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:50 AM
3

Conditioning can happen to woman child or man. Looks at the way feminism conditions women to feel victimised by everything or the media conditions people to be for or against certain things by showing them agenda-based perspectives.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:48 AM
8

I read it more as further proof that women mislead men instead of giving them simple cues. With consent, the sexist social convention is for men to ask consent and the woman to answer. If the woman can't fulfil that then they need to be taught about giving consent better. It's either yes is yes or no is no, you can't have women saying one thing and meaning another as that's just unreasonable and confusing and dangerous
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:43 AM
2

That's the shrewdness of feminism. They create these things that cannot be refuted by having things that refute them as part of the the original thing. It reminds me of a scene from the Simpsons when they're doing a hand-vote and those in favour are asked to say "yay" and those opposed are asked to say "I hate America"
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:40 AM
5

The whole thing presumes any man accused is guilty and that women never lie
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:38 AM
5

She was like 'well because it wasn't handled the way I wanted it handled therefore it was handled incorrectly'
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:36 AM
4

"How many students came to you and said they were assaulted?" - "How many perpetrators were removed from campus" - "So these guys could get away with it" So the lady asking the questions assumes that of all the students reporting sexual assault that the alleged perpetrators are all men
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:35 AM
1

If she wanted justice she'd have taken him to a criminal court not a college court who couldn't imprison him for his crime aka justice.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:30 AM
9

The quotes cherry picked try to dismiss men's arguments by the motives they apply for the arguements. Yes things were different in the past, different doesn't automatically mean worse btw, but for many men it's not about wanting to bring back the ball and chain and subjugate women, which this article infers is the motive, but being treated fairly and equally as women. Men wake up to see the world values women and doesn't value men. Our whole society is about making sure things work out better fo…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:24 AM
13

And it's funny. Men aren't asking to have things better than women just equal whereas feminists do ask for things for only women to get ahead/help and are permitted. So men having things equal equals bad but women having things superior is equals good
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:18 AM
1

If so then such equity would have to apply to all deaf people not just deaf women
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:30 PM
3

In the UK those who make accusations legally have their identity concealed while the accused has his name plastered over the media where they name and shame him before cinviction. A man and woman were caught having sex publicly outside a tube station. The ldt accused he man to abuse this system and save her reputation. She came to her senses weeks later and wirmthdrew the conplaint staing thst she lied. The damage was dien to his reputation though. Those accused should have their names concealed…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 12:44 AM
5

Your welcome. I ve been trying to educate myself more on how and why men and women are treated different and the specific reasoning recently It seems to stem from past chivalrous ideologies that haven't gone away in men and thus societal attitudes regarding valuing men haven't modernised like the treatment of women has, coupled with modern feminist propaganda to peg only men as aggressors and only women as victims and secure advantages
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:32 PM
5

Well Equity would apply to providing female prisoners the basic needs that apply to them that are specific to being women such as sanitation products for their periods and support and care and medical needs regarding pregnancy and child-birth if they are pregnant at the time of being incarcerated. But other than those I seen no biological differences that require women to have more lenient punishments than men for the same crimes. Women aren't inheritantly less mentally capable than men so to ar…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:26 PM
5

Sadly men on the whole aren't aware of the institutional sexism they face, we in the west are raised to put women's needs and interests first and men's last. Most men don't have an issue with this or see it as a problem until they face something obviously sexist and even then most would likely overlook it as a man speaking out is very taboo because we're seen as oppressive tyrants by feminist propaganda. It's a good system that feminism has designed. They've made women's interest the only intere…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 09:02 PM
2

The answer isn't for them to hide away from half the population out of overblown fear of men due to media and feminist conditioning to think of the majority of men as dangerous animals. The answer is to teach them to see that men are, like women, mostly non-violent people with a small percentage of dangerous individuals and to teach them to unlearn the victim mentality they've been taught to feel about many harmless actions around them and also to understand that women as well as men harm women …
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:37 PM
11

I should clarify the 58 suicide of 2010 were only prison suicides not all suicides. Of those 58 only one was a woman. This thread isnt so much about male suicide stats, though thats very very important, but the reaction to them conpared to the reaction to womens suicides.. The prison suicide of six women was shocking and almost brought down the whole system in the interest of protecting the victims but 57 male prison suicides had no such reaction despite being almost 6x bigger and as such those …
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:12 PM
7

Blackmail. Threats and/or coercions; Financial manipulation. Emotional manipulation. Abuse of a position of authority. Physical domination. He wouldnt be "doing her" she'd be doing him against his will
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:53 PM
17

So they'll be living without her (thankfully). The judge therefore seems to imply imprisoning her would make the kids upset. Theyll be more upset when their older and learn the mother who beat them wasnt punished correctly
/r/PussyPass24/08/16 05:30 AM
8

Exactly. It's not like we want this guy not punished but it's the issue of why the hell aren't they being punished as bad or worse when they carried out the crime? Equality demands these ladies serve a minimum of what he did, but this damn judge simply abused his powers and waived the minimum sentencing these crimes feature because their women. Oh sure he said because they were deaf but that's a smokescreen as evidence by this dude not being given the same extenuating circumstances slap on the w…
/r/PussyPass24/08/16 03:34 AM
4

Odd. Google 'Kenneth deaf 13' and you'll find some other links
/r/PussyPass24/08/16 02:53 AM
1

The sad thing is when evidence is presented parliment, who backs these lot, shoot the messenger because they refuse to accept the facts
/r/MensRights24/08/16 12:23 AM
6

Women wouldn't be convicted as women can only be victims. This would only be applied to men
/r/PussyPass23/08/16 11:57 PM
1

Same here. He needs a serious lesson in sexism, but actual sexism not the "only men do it to women" feminist kind
/r/PussyPass23/08/16 11:56 PM
1

This is why there is a specific citation for activity under sexual assault crime. I wrote to my MP and she stated that since It carries the same max sentence as rape there was no need to adjust rape laws. Well this proves that judges ignore that assertion Sadly max sentence means nothing. What there needs to be is minimum sentence that is actually Unbreakable as judges waive minimum sentencing for women all the time
/r/PussyPass23/08/16 11:52 PM
6

THIS MAN who didn't actually get to inflict suffering wasn't spared due to the EXACT SAME CONDITION.
/r/PussyPass23/08/16 11:46 PM
11

http://www.womeninprison.org.uk/about/who-we-are.php
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:43 PM
30

It's bad when it happens to women but when it happens to men? Ah it's fine - Feminists I recently read comments from women that we're glad a man was beaten or raped or something like that as it "is about time men suffered" or something like that. Basically two wrongs made a right
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:39 PM
1

Which is ironic as its a gender-dominated industry dominated that way due to sexism that men will harm the kids and women won't. No calls for more men in education though are there
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:33 PM
4

I was training to be a preschool teacher but just felt the eyes of the world were on me looking to find any excuse to accuse me of something perverted so I packed it up
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:31 PM
24

That's our "white male privilege" the feminists talk about. We're the most likely to kill ourselves, aren't we lucky
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:28 PM
35

I recently saw a women's charity that claims women are oppressed in the legal system and women's prisons should be shut down and female criminals not sent to jail for their crimes, because their women and society is what makes them commit crimes. I shit you not. The terrible thing is women already have preferential treatment and they want more under the falsehood that they are the ones discriminated again when in actual fact the opposite is the case And worst of all its funded by the government …
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:22 PM
1

Basically instead of making women who are sex offenders reform they pretend there are t any women sex offenders Love how they said 'only available to men' as if women are being discriminated against when in fact their spared having to reform
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:53 PM
3

Wise words. I'll try to find out as much as I can and only do it if the numbers speak to a need
/r/MensRights23/08/16 09:36 PM
4

I think I'm gonna start a petition calling for his removal of authority. He's clearly treating women better than men and shouldn't be allowed to get away with it
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:55 PM
1

They just ignore the stats and focus on attacking him because he doesn't follow the status quo of man = bad and woman = good
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:50 PM
1

She's not mad she just responds to words with violence, but she's not crazy, seriously!
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:48 PM
4

Feminists want women who choose to have children and take time off work to go straight back to a better paid job to make up for their time away. Basically they want women's wages to include more money for motherhood but not men's to include more for fatherhood
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:46 PM
1

The Kenneth one proves deaf people can be sent to jail. It's a precedent that shows the judges reason for sparing her from jail isn't valid
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:41 PM
1

Some of the history has increased sentences.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:36 PM
6

How is cutting away someone's flesh without their consent not mutiliation?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 08:11 PM
46

So attempted rape is more punishable than actual & repeated rape. Smh
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:24 PM
3

That there is unbiased factual reporting
/r/MensRights21/08/16 11:37 PM
9

Until men are given reproductive rights, those raped by their teachers or any woman while underage who impregnate her will sadly have to. All it takes is simply giving men what women have. The right to consent to parenthood and its ensuing rights and responsibilities. If they don't consent then they can't be forced into it, which is what happens. Since those boys taken advantage of by their teachers are legally unable to consent to see they should be legally unable to consent to the responsibili…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:55 PM
2

Basically yeah
/r/MensRights21/08/16 09:56 PM
4

Our vision is of a world without women's prisons. A world where the abuse, marginalisation and poverty at the root of so much of women's offending is addressed before women come into contact with the criminal justice system" So lady criminals aren't responsible for their actions. It's societies fault aka the patriarchys fault aka men's fault We aim to prevent the marginalisation of women and limit the damage and disruption caused through contact with the criminal justice system to women" Women a…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:35 PM
-1

She's attractive nevertheless however being so intelligent and rational does increase her attractiveness
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:23 PM
1

This is just so rational and logical and right. No wonder feminists don't want it
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:22 PM
5

This is like being in a place with 50 men in cages been sprayed with cold water and a woman sitting on a bit of rough grass and a group demands the woman be given a comfy mat to sit on
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:21 PM
3

The discrimination bit is sick. They really think women are treated better than men when the total opposite is factually true.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:18 PM
2

They want to prevent women from becoming criminal by absolving them of all responsibility for their actions? This is disgusting and is basically treating women like their children
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:16 PM
2

Translation: "when women commit criminal acts they shouldn't be treated like criminals but should be given special treatment because their women"
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:14 PM
9

Which results in going from one spectrum to the other. Equality avoided. But since it's in women's favour it's okay. Proving feminists are just as hypocritical and vindictive as the "patriarchy"
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:57 PM
1

Women get men to do things for them while claiming independence. They asked men for rights and asked men for equality and men gave it to them. Unlike men they didn't get these things by themselves through revolution but convinced men to change society for them. To this day feminists want men to fix their issues rather than women stand up and take it
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:53 PM
2

Feminists are always trying to deny men the right to be as they're made. If a woman wears short shorts and a man looks he's wrong for following his instinctual biological reaction and must be educated to be different from his nature.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:51 PM
0

Also Most likely to sacrifice their lives for entitled, ungrateful, arrogant, sexist and hateful women like this author
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:49 PM
1

This is hate speech plain and simple. They were men drunk on the entitlement that patriarchal cultures serve them Bolocks. Just cos they got away with their domestic abuse doesn't mean society allows it. The "patriarchy" has afforded women every support possible and gets no thanks for it Toxic masculinity hinges on having power over others. So does toxic femininity such as the woman drunk on power who label men racists because they cheated or use the sexist system to kick the fathers of their ch…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:37 PM
3

So people acting hostile is his fault and not the fault oh, I dunno, the actual people
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:20 AM
11

Half of money he earns. He didn't earn this money. It's compensation
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:19 AM
11

So they're celebrating Misandry and sexism by excluding the men who worked on the film. Hypocrites
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:18 AM
5

Men run the world... And prioritise women's wellbeing over men. So in the end it doesn't matter the gender in power as the result benefits women more than men. That's what feminists don't understand, they think men in power equals men out to help men and opress women and that's not an accurate view
/r/MensRights08/07/16 06:47 PM
3

It says that men being raped is unimportant compared to even a trivial issue which affect women. Womens issues are afforded great attention and empathy and support. Rape against men isn't. Its instituitalised sexism and discrimination and society ignore it so yeah it proves where people care and where they don't
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:55 PM
3

While it doesn't specifically state anal rape it implies it and the language doesn't seem to include non-consensual sex or forced-to-penetrate rape. It's good to see regardless butit should include more than just one kind of rape. Notice how it says men are less likely to report rape, which is statistically evident, however there are campaigns to get women to report more with little to no mention of getting men to report more despite men reporting less than women. Surely since men report less th…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 05:23 AM
3

Likening housework to torture is beyond morbid and insulting to the victims of the holocaust. Women aren't allowed choice? Some want to be a housewife, why should they be told they have to be something else?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:56 AM
2

Lady on Instagram was advocating for a female only taxi service with female only drivers. This was to protect women from men and I still in them that they're at risk from all men. It ignores how her friends and family are more likely to tape her and women sexually assault women too and segregation isn't the answer. She was having none of it. It was her right to avoid men for safety in the same way it was white people right to refuse black people on transport
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:52 AM
1

That's the thing. Having the opportunity and using the opportunity are two different things. Having the opportunity is crucial but not everyone has to take it. Some do want to be a stay-at-home parent and feminism shames these women because they're not following their agenda to have more women in work earning more money than men
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:35 PM
1

Reads like she wants more recognition of doing double the work of a 70s mum. that of having a job and being a parent. She seems to not mention the father anywhere in this equation as if he offers no help whatsoever or shares no part in it. Perhaps if more women didn't opt to dpi it all alone it wouldn't be as hard. Sure abusive relationships have to have the man go but often the man is just fine and is a good dad but not good enough for her so she does it alone while complaining how hard the bed…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:33 PM
1

I think though that the latter has more severe sentences depending on if the victim is male or female. In the case of a female victim the perpetrator would get longer jail time than that of the perpetrator toward a male victim as society has a sexist double standard that treats boys and not as victimised in such cases as girls
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:04 PM
1

They should refer to it as "unlawful sex" if the underage party was consenting. Rape in my mind is sex without consent. Now underage means not legally able to consent but they consented in their mind. However I think this should only apply for above certain ages. So 15 upwards is still illegal but a 15 year old is more capable of consenting than an 8 year old. So even if an 8 year old consents it wouldn't be in their best interest to as they're not mentally or psychically prepared for sex. It's …
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:01 PM
1

I don't follow US politics but this takes balls to say. His point is that men's issues have not voice or attention so he right to choose if it was a men's issue wouldn't get any publicity or focus
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:55 PM
1

That's my fear. I hate that she can choose the fate of our child and I don't even get to voice an opinion. Not just legally but even to suggest the idea of keeping the child has me come across satan because abortion is spoken of as only a female issue of body autonomy and not as one parent deciding to kill the child that is only half theirs. Men simply aren't allowed an opinion on abortion but we should as its not just her body but it's our foetus.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:53 PM
1

It's because abortion is seen as only a body rights issue and not as what it really is a parental choice and body rights issue. Women get to choose not to be a parent via abortion. But in discussions this isn't allowed to be raised as it shows the double standard of men not having that legal choice. So they focus entirely on the body autonomy side with things like "her body her choice" rather than "their child her choice". Half the issue is flat out ignored and that's the issue that relates to m…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:52 PM
1

Female-on-male violence happens it's just invisible to society. It's accepted due to it not being seen as an issue. Women on TV slap and punch men with impunity and it's not seen as wrong. Women even rape men in movies and TV and it's not considered rape and is even played for laughs. Men are taught explicitly not to ever hit a woman. Women aren't taught not to hit men. People at large view domestic abuse and rape as a male-on-female crime exclusively. When that's not reality. When a man defends…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:42 PM
1

Good job. You seem like you came across well to her and held things nicely. This should help give you more confidence in the next date. Well done
/r/seduction25/04/16 11:03 PM
11

This was fascinating.
/r/seduction25/04/16 10:56 PM
1

I agree but I guess I feel this guy is devaluing men and their role and is contributing to men being considered disposable.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:52 AM
3

I get paid on Monday. Definitely gonna make a donation. I only wish there was more awareness for this. Problem is women's issues dominate gender issues and men's charities get the scraps left over. And they say the patriarchy is pro-men and anti-women. If that was the case it would be prostate cancer and this charity getting all the money and women's charities getting none
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:42 PM
3

Women only please Since that's no big deal then it must be cool if another school says "white parents only" or "straight people only"
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:24 PM
2

I don't understand how the majority can vote for the bill but one person can cave to pressure and veto it. The majority decided then the feminists raged then one person said "okay we'll scrap equality because you asked us to" This is why we need actual men's groups in a position of influence because Feminism can come along and destroy something without any oppostion
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:19 PM
1

They cite "Sexual assault by Penetration" Something women don't have to do when raping a man. Convenient.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:14 PM
4

It proves that Men aren't the only ones who are sexual predators. Sadly that's a stereotype that is applied to Men for the most part. A woman could approach to help a lost kid and nobody would batt an eye but a man would be prequels to be a pedo. This shows that Women are equally as dangerous
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:09 PM
6

Women do abandon their families and the Fathers manage just fine alone. This guy is a traitor to his gender to suggest we're worthless
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:06 PM
1

File a complaint on the grounds if defamation of you gender and hate speech. print off some with the actual stats
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:04 PM
6

Her assertion I think is that unless you get a specific verbal "yes" from someone for each and every sexual act and you are 100% certain they're not intoxicated at all and thus able to legally consent then you're a rapist. Also it's the mans sole responsibility to get constant consent and the woman doesn't have to get consent from the man for everything they do in bed. So basically a man is a rapist unless he fills the above criteria but a woman isn't if she fails them all. By this definition of…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:17 PM
1

You mean they're only suggesting to punish men for a crime they didn't commit so as to get abortion legalised? that'd be like trying to legalise cannabis by prosecuting people for possession who don't have any cannabis on them
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:58 PM
1

Both conceived the child but only one is committing the abortion and it's not him. When has a part in the crime, which is the abortion, which currently is solely her decision then you can make a case that he should be held accountable for the abortion but he hasn't as she gets total say on having one or not. They're basically trying to punish him for getting her pregnant when pregnancy isn't a crime. And punishing her for the abortion which is. It's punishing him for her decision to have an abor…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:47 PM
1

And that's very sad and shouldn't happen. Doesn't change THIS issue, that of a man being punished for a crime committed by someone else, being fundamentally wrong.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:27 PM
1

This isn't about abortion or the punishment of the woman for a crime she commits it's about the absurd idea that a Man should be punished despite having nothing to do with a crime committed by someone's else, which is ass backwards. Having an abortion when illegal is a crime and the woman in question would be breaking the law but the man in such a scenario wouldn't be breaking the law as he's not committing the crime she is so at its basis it's him being punished for something he didn't do. Abor…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:08 PM
1

I know it's illegal but the decision to have one or not is 100% the woman's like it is everywhere. If the man has no say in what happens regarding abortion then (in Northern Ireland) why should he have to be penalised for someone else's decision. or in this case crime
/r/MensRights16/04/16 01:52 PM
2

It's more like they're against the draft but say they won't object if it comes into law that women are required to register like men. However the lawmakers have no reason to push for women to be included as there's no pressure for them to join. Feminists say they won't oppose it but I'd imagine if such a thing were proposed that some would and some would be enough for the law,Akers to fold and keep things the same. Basically men can be conscripted and women don't have to be but since it's not li…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 11:24 PM
14

So she kidnaps their kids and all the comments are supporting her and claiming that she must have had a good reason. Because of course Women aren't capable of acting selfish or being in the wrong. If the father had run off with the kids they'd be saying he's an abuser and is a kidnapper but when a Mother doesn't it then He is still the bad guy and her the escaping victim
/r/MensRights15/04/16 10:53 PM
7

Why is it that pretty much every problem that society faces is said to affect women more than men and that its a women's issue rather then a human issue. And when it's shown that men face these issues to they're thought to be less victimised by it
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:41 PM
2

I read this somewhere else. Men are valued more woe on their jobs and their income and the lifestyle they can provide whereas women more so on looks
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:29 PM
5

He has no say in her decision yet they're saying he should be held accountable. Are they fucking mad? "Her body her choice" means he has no decision or say regarding the execution of their child-to-be, but they have the gall to say he should be punished if she carries out that action entirely on her own This would be like punishing the husband if the wife killed a bunch of people. Or punishing the landlord if the tenant commits a crime. It's madness. If I were there I'd propose the person who sa…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:25 PM
3

They say they don't want anyone drafted but they don't campaign to end the draft so that men and women are equally not in such a position. They only want equality that benefits women so it's fine for the men to face the draft and that's an inequality they don't mind
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:14 PM
5

She contradicts herself by claiming mothers mean nothing and then saying they do mean 50% right to the child. Also she has pregnancy entitlement. The idea that because women carry the baby for nine months out of their entire lifetime they deserve sole right to the child and the mans contribution means squat
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:36 PM
3

Marriage and children are seen as service provided by a woman rather than a decision and thus the man should pay her for her time and effort rather than she pay for her own decisions like an equal and responsible adult
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:34 PM
8

Why should a man have to pay for his ex? Surely this law is sexist as it implies women are weaker or in need of care from men and can't earn money themselves so surely feminists are out to get rid of alimony and the oppressive nature of it. Oh wait, free money, guess it'll be one of the sexisms they accept and defend
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:32 PM
3

I only caught the second half but wow the first half really seems this idea that there's no resources for women in domestic abuse situations when there not only are but twice or ten times as much for men in those same situations "Finally get the respect they deserve"? They already have that! Every single point in this video is gender blind and affects men as much as women yet it's told only from the women's perspective and implied men don't face these issues and implied women only face these iss…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:23 PM
4

Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl, I was trying She's Nucking Futs!!
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:08 PM
4

Oftentimes we're raised to man up and take shit that women are taught not to tolerate. Men are harassed, manipulated, degraded and abused as much as women but it's invisible as its accepted. Turn on an episode of tween show iCarly and see the boy character beaten by the girl character almost every episode, for laughs. Rape against men is seen as not possible or funny or not-rape like on the Simpsons where Marge raped homer and nobody not even Honer looked at it as rape. I read that in a study 40…
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:05 PM
2

Exactly, they're basically saying Feminism = good and anything else = bad, and like Feminism silencing any contrary viewpoints and dismissing them
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:59 PM
2

Apparently it's insulting to suggest organisations exist to help men who are treated badly due to their gender. Society has this mistaken idea perpetuated by women's groups that Men are never victims and Women face 100x the problems and deserve total autonomy
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:58 PM
1

Like everything else with feminism it's the mans job to fix women's issues for them rather than them actively doing more. Take STEM its all about forcing quotas and demanding men give women more roles for equalities sake but not about getting women to try harder or apply more. Wage gap? That's about men giving women more money despite working less and not the women earning it
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:53 PM
2

"Well when we fix gender roles by focusing all our attention on women and LGBT Men will probably benefit in some manner to I guess, Gotta take the bitter with the sweet I suppose" And that's sufficient for stupid places like this that think a teeny tiny bit of men's issues being aided as an unintentional outcome of feminism. Society is basically scared to back men in anyway that could seem a threat to women taking over
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:50 PM
3

He's bang on about the "earning" issue. Look at STEM rather than encouraging women to go for the roles more and earn them they're demanding Women be given the roles by Men, because of the disparity. And it's true as well about the slavery. Whites get blamed for Slavery but no credit is given to the other whites who ended slavery just like Men aren't given any credit for giving women more rights. It's always a 'never enough' case In the UK the average man didn't have the right to vote, he earned …
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:18 PM
1

Their policies don't matter as they don't expect to get elected, it's all about propaganda and keeping the spotlight on, 'So much more needs to be done ...'. Agreed. Given the issues they showed having mostly nothing to do with women's issues it seems the name is just to keep "Women's inequalities" at the forefront of public consciousness I didn't say I was voting for them just what they advertised
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:45 PM
1

Why? That's just disturbing, is there really a need for that when this is a school we're talking about? I haven't even heard of a need for showers let alone a shortage For some reason they associated this with getting kids to cycle more. Is there some magical form of discrimination against these children that stops them from doing this Agreed. There's nothing stopping women and men from doing almost anŷ jobs they want if they commit themselves to going for it
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:43 PM
5

Apparently "her body, her choice" doesn't apply to prostitutes and these women in positions of power get to police their bodies and income by limiting the amount of customers they'll get
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:40 PM
5

Of course, the only pre-requisite is wanting double standards to end and men to be recognised as facing injustices due to their gender.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:22 PM
3

So a willing and consenting prostitute gets off Scot free whereas the John is arrested. How is that fair, oh yeah it isn't because all women are assumed to be victims and men agree sorts
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:20 PM
4

Well my post wasn't about placating for the sake of feminists but for the rest of people who have a view of Mens Rights as a hate group
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:41 PM
8

Unfortunately for actual victims it's hard to prove they were raped unless they go to the hospital right away and there's DNA evidence or signs of rape and he can't account for his whereabouts at the supposed time. Sadly women's groups don't encourage women to not wash away evidence or report right away but insist they can wash away evidence and wait years and that should be enough. Not to mention they keep trotting out the women aren't believed argument which is nuts as women are always believe…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:38 PM
8

And that's irksome. She has contradicted her own story yet it doesn't seem to be acknowledged. If his defence has contradicted itself you can bet it would be taken as gospel as a citation of his character
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:32 PM
3

If she wants Dr. Luke prosecuted for rape, she can do that through the legal system and stop doing it in the court of public opinion She doesn't want him off the streets otherwise she would've pressed charges. The only court that she can win in is the court of the online fan community who support any claim. An actual court looks at evidence and there's enough to show her story doesn't add up. Breaking this contract over this would be bad for contract law. They offered her the option of working w…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:54 PM
7

Agreed and it doesn't do any good for this subs rep or the movement to be outright calling her a liar about this even with the deposition as it makes it appear that we're pro-rape by those who think with emotional outrage rather than their inbiased mind. Saying "I can't believe that about him just because she said it" is the best response as it promotes innocent until proven guilty without it making us seem that we're out to get anyone who makes a claim
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:45 PM
6

I doubt such an issue will ever be passed unless it's done before Feminists and other women's groups, which outnumber Men's groups by 1/20 and have a monopoly on gender issues, can kick up a storm The second they get wind they freak out and those presenting the bill are inundated and back down.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:34 PM
2

I don't really agree. My Aunts husband just stopped talking to her and it hurt. A lot. Turned out he was gay but she loved him and it hurt to find out and split. It was different when he was young so he couldn't come out then but it was so selfish of him to treat her like that
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:05 PM
7

"I didn't get the answer I wanted so I'll discount it and keep asking til I get the one that suits me"
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:04 PM
12

And the guy Kesha accused. Most think him guilty even though there's nothing but her word
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:02 PM
1

No. But one can inspire change in others. Like in the bystander effect
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:01 PM
3

And with Male rapes they often don't count anything except forced penetration by anther man. So men raped by women by forced penetration or men raped by men or women via made to penetrate are not counted. This way they can present less males being raped
/r/MensRights04/04/16 09:54 PM
58

"Your tears say more than evidence ever could" That's basically it. Accusations are all people need to label a man a Rapist and never consider him innocent even after the verdict
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:57 PM
4

If they believed in that they'd call out the movement for its lack of action in areas where men are discriminated against
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:54 PM
10

Would be a good idea to encourage less posting that's just to shame feminists that gives people the idea this place is just whining about feminists rather than about a positive place for wanting men to have equal rights and treatment in areas where we are discriminated against
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:50 PM
2

So the issue seems that they made an agreement and now that circumstances aren't what they thought, that they're more popular than they thought they'd be, they want to re-negotiate new contracts with different pay. If their contract allows them to re-negotiate then that's great and they should opt for it, if not and they willingly and legally agreed to the terms of the contract and have to live out the contract and can't re-negotiate until then then legally they should have to wait otherwise con…
/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:34 PM
3

Equal pay is an important issue but what disturbed me though is this petition has 13000 signatures while the petition for Male Rape victims to be recognised as rape victims had 5000. Seems people care more about people being paid the same than about people being given justice for a heinous crime
/r/MensRights03/04/16 04:38 PM
4

Sounds like they opted for a set guaranteed salary rather than based on performance or revenue brought in and now regret is so a crying sexism
/r/MensRights03/04/16 04:37 PM
2

I read a story about a woman who has a pain then popped out a baby. Never knew she was pregnant. And what about women who surrogate bthey go through the pain for the sake of helping a person become a father or mother. Why is giving birth so the father can raise the child a bad thing? I guess it's this idea of her being forced as if she's shackled. Forcing a woman to have a baby she doesn't want for the benefit of the father isn't what this is about. it's more a cultural issue that the Woman shou…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:07 AM
28

Exactly. Why would the supposed patriarchy which is all about men being in power screw over men in this and other regards.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:01 AM
11

I understand that women face a much harder time with reproduction than Men but a child is 50% his and 50% hers yet she has 100% choice and he has 0% choice and that's just not fair. I don't like the idea of forcing a woman to have a child she doesn't want so that the man who does want the child can be a Father but ideally the woman in question would want to bring the child to term for his sake and the Child's. It's a sensitive issue but surely even though it's uncomfortably and painful to carry …
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:50 AM
1

But there's something to be said about going to the police ASAP because the evidence is fresh and easier to work with, document, and use in court. Therein lies the problem with Feminism. Instead of advocating going to police with the evidence fresh they advocate removing the need for evidence or examination. That won't or shouldn't happen and by advocating for that and ignoring that evidence is washed away and there lessening the victims case to lock up the rapist when they could be teaching the…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:40 AM
0

Excellent post that's exactly it. Rather than discuss the arguments they just throw a label to silence the person. It's the basic idea behind rape culture. They take regular sexism or objectification and use the word rape for shock value and the negative connotation that goes along with it. So if someone disagrees they can say "oh you disagree with ending rape culture?" And make that person out to be pro-rape when they're not. Using the term rape and it's negative connotation actually undermines…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:34 AM
1

Law broken for women? That's a laugh. Lenient sentences galore for women and parental law has all rights for women and almost none for men.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:28 AM
24

When has mistreatment of men by women ever had outrage behind it.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 02:26 AM
1

I saw this. The comments on the lady criminal mention the double standards but the Johnson ones have all Paedo comments. Funny how she isn't considered a Paedo, it's like that term is reserved for men, acting like men can be Rapists and Paedos but Women can't
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:02 AM
0

Commemorating it's isn't allowed
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:56 AM
10

I agree that she was mentally unstable and this not responsible but it begs the question how was she responsible for the child with such mental issues?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:01 PM
10

Whether or not women get lenient sentences more than Men. This psycho deserves to be punished severely
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:36 PM
2

If you interrupt no matter gender or race you deserve being told to shut up and wait your turn
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:31 PM
7

Apparently this is a Fake story set up by this news outlet to cause outrage against benefit claimants. https://m.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/49bzn9/lesbian_mumtobe_tricked_man_into_getting_her/
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:21 PM
3

No way. How can that work though. Telling fake stories as news. Surely they're not allowed to do that. And it raises the question of why would they make up such a story?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:07 PM
13

Huh. I've been here for about s month and a half and never seen it
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:06 PM
0

And what makes you say that?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:54 AM
8

More details HERE
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:43 AM
1

She mentions is too expensive so she used this poor guy for its cheapness. She planned it all out without a care for his wellbeing, emotions and basically didn't even treat him like a human being having just disposed of him as soon as she got what she wanted
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:21 AM
1

I've heard of foreigners who come to theUK pregnant just so they can birth here and claim benefits. While in the EU a German lady for example can come here, have the baby the claim child tax credits and move back and still get them despite not living in the country
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:19 AM
10

Moonlighting as a Pornstar isn't exactly hiding ones activity but I feel it's wrong to name and shame him for a legal progression. They ran an article before this which according to this now may lose him his career. I can u der stand the University wanting to protect reputation but Porn isnt illegal and is less taboo these days so I see no reason for him to lose his teaching job unless is performance has suffered
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:39 PM
6

I'm just shocked at the level of her diminishment of Men as Fathers. She thinks they aren't a factor at all that they're merely a instrument to get her what she wants and have no connection to the child.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:14 PM
6

It was good to see others denouncing her sickening attitudes
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:12 PM
1

This is a common Feminist move. The idea that Rape or violence can be educated away is a fairytale. Rape is abhorrent but the amount of rapes compared to the amount of people is minuscule. That's not to denounce it's seriousness but to point out people are (in the west) taught not to rape from birth, same as not to steal or kill. The vast majority of those who do rape and murder and steal already were taught and already know it's wrong and don't care. Putting the blame on All men for the actions…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:08 PM
3

Thats why we need to reframe the argument. Instead of saying its ok for everybody to hit each other equally we should say its not ok for anyone to hit each other to begin with. Equally of course. Assault is assault We already do this though. People are taught not to be violent. Those who do don't care, do it anyway and are the exception. In those situations a person no matter who the attacker is should be considered in-the-right to be able to attack back, reasonably. None of this "he's smaller s…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:52 PM
1

They clearly aren't responsible for their own actions
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:47 PM
7

Actually yes. A woman recently stabbed a domestic abusing husband and left him to die, he rang the police and later died. He was an abusive man, but he was stabbed during a verbal arguement so it wasn't considered self-defence. The comments were all "poor woman". She killed a man who previously had abused and it was okay with most. I sympathise with her but laws exist so that vengeance killings or killing in the heat of the moment are discouraged. She was sentences with manslaughter under minist…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:46 PM
1

To lurkers or dissenters. I can't speak for everyone here but I speak for myself and what I'd assume is the majority here that we don't want to hit women. That's not what this is about this is about society not denouncing men who retaliate when provoked with an attack from a woman and not making special allowances for one gender over another.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:42 PM
101

Taking full advantage of his lack of rights. Hideous person.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:36 PM
3

Yeah, Basically that no special allowances or discriminations should be made on the basis of race, gender, sexuality ect.. If for example a gay man attacks me I have the right to fight back and him being gay doesn't factor in the slightest, same as with women or others, not counting children of course. If you attack someone you open the floodgates to be hit back against and there shouldn't be any "but she's a woman" or "but he's transgender" or the like which makes them need handling differently…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:26 PM
3

My point is there is no carte blanche right to go mental on someone who assualts you. Nobody said there was. I specifically mentioned reasonable force which is a punch, kick, push or slap in response to having one of those done against a victim. Excessive force isn't tolerated and those who use it are cited and punished for going beyond necessary measures. But a person slapping a slapper back is reasonable and shouldn't be dissuaded because of gender The point is this automatic, "if you get punc…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:02 PM
3

Men are taught to be happy with any sexual contact even if they're uncomfortable or feel violated by it. There's is still the idea that if a boy is raped by an attractive teacher that he's lucky. Women have more control over what they feel is and is not assault or rape wheras men would likely feel they've been assaulted or raped only if in serious pain from the act
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:25 PM
12

It's advocating for the rights of the attacker over the victim because the attacker is a woman and victim a man, despicable
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:21 PM
3

I saw another female reporter denounce this 'period leave' thing. It seems it's a policy being thrust upon Women who don't want it or condone it too
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:20 PM
11

Women aren't children. Size isn't general, I'm 5.6 and 120lbs, most woman are bigger than me, that doesn't mean I can hit them and they can't hit me back because I'm smaller and or weaker. Why should someone who has been slapped be thoughtful of the rights and possible condition of the attacker before defending themselves? They gave up that right the second they assaulted me. When an Adult hits another Adult the one who was hit have the right to strike back with one hit to cease them attacking y…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:11 PM
8

Obviously if a woman hits a man and he waits 5 minutes and out of nowhere hits her back that's not self-defence but upon being hit a man has the right and should be encouraged to not fear striking back in defence no matter how hard the attacking blow was. Moral of the story is 'if you lay hands on me I'll lay hands on you so don't assault me' an assaulted person shouldn't wait for more attacks to respond that's insane Further, no one should have to do mental gymnastics to ascertain if they can h…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:56 PM
127

Wow. Whoopi hit the nail on the head. The others especially the "man can't his a woman ever" are disgusting. If you hit a man or woman they have the right to hit you back. END OF. Men shouldn't be taught to accept it at all
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:53 AM
20

I think it's great more women are applying but having a quota for male applicants and not female applicants is plain sexist. Telling Applicant 351 they cant take his application because he's a Man is plainly discrimination. Further, they should face equal tests and standards, no special treatment. Giving Women an easier job, for the same pay of course, is telling the man he has to work harder for the same amount of money and that's just wrong. And not only wrong it will cause resentment over the…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:56 AM
5

Some areas of note: In 2013 a joint piece of work by the Home Office, Ministry of Justice and Office for National Statistic suggested that around 20 per cent of victims don’t report incidents of sexual assault and rape to the police. However, these estimates were developed using data on reporting habits collected only from women. Basically it was assumed that Male victims report of don't report in the same numbers as Female victims, when it's actually actually much less. 3.9% according to the ch…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:09 AM
2

So glad they're trying to combat or atleast raise awareness of the suicide issue facing men
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:51 AM
2

Firstly I can't really se how this affects Men's rights. I understand her victims are Male but she is being investigated against so other than highlighting a horrific crime how does this fit if you say Double Standard of being released on bail I agree with that and that a man likely wouldn't but that's supposition. If her sentencing was less compared to a male of the same level of crimes that'd apply but that's unknown as of now. I dunno this seems like taking an issue with a crime more than som…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:35 AM
4

and ? A lot fewer women are trying to found startups than men. It's like blaming a field for sexism when facts might state that 7/10 applicants are male and thus the odds favour them. Thus the issue is on the amount of women lobbying and not that they're being discriminated against. I had a conversation with my sister about this and she pointed out the make-up stores like Lush and Bodysop and counters like a Benefit and M.A.C make-up. That field is 95% women and applicants she said would likely …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:19 AM
1

Surely women pay more for shampoo because women wash their hair more than men so charging the main demographic more is kinda like supply and demand 3 and 8 is for both men and woman which seems to indicate they only found eight areas for women so had to pad the list with a gender neutral entries For number 4 work harder, be more committed, it's no secret you could be a CEO is you pushed for it hard enough. Number 5 is unfortunate. I'd bet Single Fathers and non-Single Fathers face this too, perh…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:09 AM
2

I think treating it as an oversight and avoiding going directly for it would help in getting people to acknowledge their shortsightedness rather than having them go into the defensive. I think you're right. It might seem aggressive, I guess I was just angry and surprised at how it was so sexist yet didn't realise it. My e-mail probably did come across as very blame heavy but it seems that given the amount of people working on it some should have seen how one-sided it was. They thought to put in …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:28 AM
11

Disgusting inequality.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:53 PM
11

Three videos in the campaign. Penis touching Vagina without consent Male hand touching Female breast without consent Penis touching Female bottom without consent See a pattern. Only men are the perpetrators of touching without consent and only women even in gender neutral body parts such as Hands and Bottoms as the victims I emailed them with my complaints "I was shocked to see the blatantly sexist nature of your campaign. In none of the videos are Women shown as the perpetrators of sexual activ…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:13 PM
1

We have less relatives, and weaker links to them I'm Irish. I have tons of relatives who are also white
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:01 PM
1

I'm confused over this part about false rape reports the result of this is that fewer women are believed, because of course these stories fall apart. Is her saying that false raccusations shouldn't be reported on so as not discourage victims who would come forth no matter if they are? That would basically be saying that women liars who try to label men as rapists should get away with it
/r/MensRights28/02/16 07:05 PM
2

Woman: Well I was arrested for penetration without consent. No big deal Person: That's terrible. You should always get consent Man: I was arrested for rape, no big deal Person: WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU? GET OUTTA MY SIGHT NOW OR INSWEAR I WILL KNOWCK TOUR TEETH IN. YOU DISGUST ME!!!
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:53 PM
1

With the way that's wondered if speaks more to penetration from the perpetrator to the victim.. For instance it states "penetration of B’s anus or vagina," but not "penetration of an anus or vagina," If a woman throws a man down and stimulates him then penetrates herself using him without his consent those take some rewording to make a case.. "Penetration without consent" would be a more neutral term as it can mean a man penetrating another man or woman without his or her consent or a woman pene…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:35 PM
2

No but bimbos don't really hang out at the UN. They're bleached blonde, stiletto wearing, pink plump lipped, fake boobed dim minded women
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:12 AM
9

Excellent counterpoint
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:59 AM
5

Bimbo isn't really an applicable term. She doesn't dress trashy for attention or act overly narcissistic about her appearance. she comes across more snobby and entitled
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:58 AM
8

DF Energy have failed to understand both the nature of the problem [of women in Stem] and the negative impacts that their publicity stunt may well have on girls who took part with genuine enthusiasm and excitement." They lost to a boy. They have two options to suck it up and come up with ideas as good as his or give up and feel bad. If the girls have less enthusiasm and excitement then they aren't cut out for the job and that's on them and how they react to adversity. They're giving the girls so…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:45 AM
2

There was an article on daily mail of a 16 year old girl who went to a politics all panel and gave an amazingly intelligent response. I wanted to shake her hand and and wished I was that knowledgable at that age. She was a role model for me today
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:38 AM
1

Gone from the front page and the news page. only way to access this article is to google it or click the link. Most won't see it :(
/r/MensRights27/02/16 06:36 AM
2

This is hugely important, it is however not really something where the blame is on someone or something but rather a fault in society which needs to be addressed. What's the level of research being done to answer why white men are more likely to commit suicide? Only then can it be truly aided
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:50 AM
1

It also ignores the fact that it wasn't a sexual assault or rape case so their "prevail against their abusers in court" means financial link rather than justice for the alleged assault
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:47 AM
1

Since this wasn't a sexual assault or rape case then her being an alleged victim has no bearing at all. This was a contract dispute, one that doesn't obligate her to work alongside the alleged abuser since Somy have already given her lick of any producer and they rightfully found no reason for her to be let out of the contract. Her only legitimate reason to be released would be having to work with him after her claims, but that's not the case and since that's not the case she doesn't have a case
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:45 AM
1

I wonder what the statute definition for the rape of man in regards to unconsensual sex is under the Law
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:39 AM
1

I HATE this definition. It basically says only women can be raped and anything done do a man is some other term, likely carrying less of a sentence. I too would like to campaign against this. Might write to my MP actually
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:36 AM
1

feel 36 counts in a trust based environment with minors demands some attention. Oh absolutely. I've found that the media tends to run wild with a select amount of cases each year usually running with them for weeks at a time and a lot fall through the cracks of getting attention. In regard to my point imagine an alleged serial rapist with 10 alleged victims was caught and an alleged celebrity serial rapists with 5 alleged victims was accused. The latter would get far more attention despite less …
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:32 AM
1

So they're basically saying a discrimination case from in the past can prove they can discriminate now?
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:28 AM
5

She could've gone for movies with female directors but she only did twice. Further, that's not HER experiencing sexism it'd be the directors experiencing sexism IF they were denied training or work.. Directors have I believe been a job more men than women trained for. I bet right now there's more men choosing to train to be directors than women. If that results in more men than women being directors then it's womenkinds fault for not having more applicants. (It's like the pay gap, if more men ap…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:08 AM
1

Her accusation has got more attention than that because she's a celebrity. Lack of media-coverage for alledged assaults doesn't mean justice won't be carried out. In fact imo it allows true justice to take place with more falsely accused being dragged through the mud by the media and having their lives ruined due to lack if anonymity With the Kesha thing Despite the evidence of her lying under oath she has 100% support and he's all but considered guilty. Theres no "wait for evidence" or "innocen…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:56 AM
2

I'd recommend reporting her to her superior or human resources. Your claim might not pull as much credence as a females claim against a man but not reporting it is in part letting this divide continue. For all you know their might be complaints against her already and yours would valid them further. Definitely do not speak to her first as she could got to them first claiming you did something
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:51 AM
2

Ha! Never noticed. Y'know what im gonna leave it ;)
/r/MensRights26/02/16 08:04 PM
12

If a man was locked into a contract I doubt there'd be a FREE *** movement.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:50 PM
6

Accused him sex weeks later Seems exploiting the law to preserve her reputation
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:07 PM
2

They teach victim-culture that men are to blame for basically everything and the idea that teaching a girl to be strong and self-sufficient is taking one more lemming away from them.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:18 PM
2

Don't take it personally. It happened to me. I was outraged then I discovered tons here had the same thing. Reasonable posts banned because they don't agree
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:00 PM
13

The comments are all "the poor girl" and not a care for the falsely accused. Most even claim years of abuse exonerates her while failing to read that she only just re-met her Father after being absent all her life. If he managed to abuse her from outside her life he must be highly skilled at it
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:48 PM
1

Inconvenient is defined as uncomfortable therefore my usage was correct. If their language skills are inadequate and they mis-interpret a word that's their problem
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:53 PM
-4

You were raped by three different men at different times? Wow that's really unlucky. Do you deny that rape victims and those who falsely pretend to be victims of rape get support or help?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:39 AM
1

Well Inconvenient is defined as "causing troubles, difficulty or discomfort". I'd say that fits, the examination would be considered uncomfortable after all. either way their point was they shouldnt have to go through the process and men should be tried without any of that.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:51 AM
3

Good for him so filing the suit
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:50 AM
1

They were named and shamed by local politicians And their compensation for being such when they were innocent is????
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:46 AM
6

They told police when they entered the park they saw the woman and her father engaged in a sex act. That night, this young woman's father and the five young men engaged in conduct that was reprehensible and wrong, Woah. Am I reading this wrong or was the Father and the Daugter "in flagranté"
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:12 AM
7

I saw this comment Many of these posts go to show, yet again, that people don't understand legal procedures. Being found not guilty doesn't mean the woman in the case is a liar, it just means the court couldn't find him guilty without reasonable doubt. Two totally different things entirely. Rape is extremely difficult to get a conviction for due to lack of witnesses etc. I suggest the 'name the false accuser' commenters get a grip and realise how ridiculous they sound I can't disagree with him/h…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:04 AM
1

I was part of a debate on this issue where a woman used "mansplaining" as 'difference of opinion" another accused the men who wanted investigation before declaring him guilty of being pro-rape and another who claimed that whenever women report rape and are questioned and examined that everyone involved is sexist question her clothing and calling her a slut and so forth. While that can happen I can't believe it's the majority. These days you can be arrested for brushing past a woman or sent to hu…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:55 PM
2

It's boring and uncomfortable to bother going through that process apparently.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:49 PM
2

The sad thing is they think taking statements, performing an examinations, gathering facts and making an investigation is victim-blaming. They think these things cause women (not men apparently) not to report rapes. Well there's no other way to gather what happened, you cant just have a "she said it so it's true" justice system and that's what they seem to want. Just because giving statement and being examined is an inconvenience doesn't mean it can be ignore or declared misogynistic
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:46 PM
1

I had an acquaintance who always said that an accuser should always be believed and never questioned Hate this so much. Why should someone be believed and another presumed guilty on nothing but a because-she-said-so? Neither party should be believed until sufficient evidence points in one direction or another.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:37 PM
1

Dwindling numbers as taking jobs is a huge risk to men more than women as any accusation will destroy a man as he's presumed guilty until proven innocent where's women are nicely until proven guilty
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:56 PM
4

Like the draft. They want equality except in areas where it doesn't benefit them
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:53 PM
2

Feminists are narcissists who are obsessed with their own oppression. They are either incapable of seeing the suffering of others, or they justify it by saying our privilege makes up for it Bingo and they keep creating new areas where they're victims so they'll never be rid of oppression against women and get to men's issues
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:53 PM
2

The head of the MET said they're basically forced to make arrests and go to court for incidents they know are BS and don't warrant it due to scrutiny and uninformed public outcry if they don't
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:51 PM
2

The media is the worst culprit. They'd report on an accused as guilty and would run with updates for weeks or months then once the verdict is put they'd run one piece declaring the rapist as innocent and that's it. The false accuser is given a tiny fraction of press despite the fact she'd have been proven guilty and beforehand him not
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:53 PM
1

UK Porn is like Indie films compared to Hollywood. They could close the whole thing down and most wouldn't notice. Unless they block all porn this isn't an issue for most of us in the UK
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:47 PM
32

They'd just claim there are hundreds of rapes but they're just not reported and if that was debunked it'd be that the women (only women) are raped but are conditioned to think they haven't been raped and so on You dared to not agree and kiss their asses about their sacred doctrines so they silenced you. They know much of their issues aren't as widespread or damaging as they preach so have to silence people otherwise their movement would fall apart
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:43 PM
2

Don't imagine it'll get much press no matter the verdict
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:40 PM
2

That makes sense. Can't speak for this school but my old one and my nephews one allows trousers for girls
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:58 PM
11

I don't see how having to wear a suit and tie "holds men down." however I do see how having to wear a dress would hold women down. And why is one holding a person down and not the other exactly?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:40 PM
21

Lying equals Rape now?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:19 PM
1

And then they wonder why people don't like them. I only got involved in gender politics recently and started in feminism as I assumed it was about equality then lots of man-hating ensued and being banned left right and centre for daring to disagree and found my way here
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:18 PM
7

Huh. It says men spend $133 and women $56 on average but that Anericans per person spend $133. I'm confused
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:33 AM
6

Why are you even bringing up the wage gap? You realize this is not a competition as to who has it worse, right I brought up the wage gap as the suicide difference is a big gap between genders and the the wage gap is a difference between genders. It's called comparison. One has a lot of attention at the moment and one does not. It shows how a gap that affects women financially is seen as more "important" than a gap that affects men's mortality. It's not about competition of "who has things worse"…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:55 AM
3

The problem with reversing anonymity for accusers is that it will be portrayed as an attack on women This is a fundamental problem with Feminisms idea of victim-blaming. Wanting an accuser to have his or her identity kept private until a verdict is not siding with him or her over the alleged victim. It's doing so to prevent the destruction of that's persons social and work life before there's an informed decision of that person being guilty or not. Investigating whether the event happened is not…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:25 AM
6

Prison death statistics too. 94% Difference
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:01 AM
8

It is not feminists fault that men commit suicide more often They reason is unknown but it's something that needs to be investigated as its a shockingly big gap and there's evidently something in society which affects men more than women to commit suicide at such a bigger rate Interesting how the gender gap that involves DEATH isn't getting as much attention as the pay gap. Surely the 80% difference in suicide rates between the sexes is a bigger issue than the 20% difference in pay. I wonder if …
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:42 AM
25

I was banned for discussing men's disadvantages in a thread about men's disadvantages. I politely asked why and was threatened with shadowbanning Another here was banned for separating MRA & pick-up artists in a topic about MRAs. Same threat r/Feminism bans anyone has posted to r/mensrights no matter the post. That's their position on equality. Every female problem is blamed on men or the Patricarchy, which is men in power. Most mentions of men's issues is dismissed as not-as-important as women'…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:17 AM
1

Unbelievable. Not a single thing in your post could be considered ban-worthy. Happened to me too. A man? = get banned
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:48 AM
5

Slapped her down with facts. Bravo
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:45 PM
1

This is even anti-feminist as it encourages women to be passive and have men take control
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:11 PM
1

So it encourages women to let men do all the work and take no share of the responsibility AND it at the same time demonizes men as not interested if they don't do all the work
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:08 PM
5

Well I assume it's a rule. It says "you can contact the moderators regarding your ban by replying to this message." But myself and others were muted for doing so so they're not abiding by that
/r/MensRights12/02/16 10:05 PM
18

You should message a mod and tell them you're a woman and that it must be changed back. Say that being a woman doesn't mean you can't care about men's rights as much as women's
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:45 PM
9

Ugh. Guys generally means groups of people these days. But go ahead tell people what they can and can't say it's amusing to see them shut you up with freedom
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:39 PM
3

Yeah I was pleasantly surprised too. Feminists can be reasonable and see a woman in the wrong and call her in the wrong, sometimes
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:29 PM
8

A direct infringement of reddits own rule which states you can reply to a banning message to ask why
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:17 PM
2

Happened to me too. I was banned and asked why and was muted then after the 72 mute period asked politely again and was threatened with a shadowbanning for spamming and harassment No wonder so many become anti-feminist seeing as how If you disagree with them they expel you
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:16 PM
27

Can't believe such a sexist term made it into the dictionary at all
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:09 AM
2

But she's the one who doesn't want anymore children not him. So her being the instigator means she should take the risk since it's her idea. If it was his idea then getting cut would make sense but it being her idea means taking responsibility and not putting it on him
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:07 AM
4

That's her body, and it is more about her choice to live her life at a level, than about forcing her will on him But she's demanding he be the one to have surgery to prevent conception. You says "that's her body" but what about his body. If she doesn't want anymore children she should be the one to take action rather than dictating he do it. Like you said she's got several birth control options and surgery options yet she's telling him to do it
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:05 AM
1

If she's so adamant of not having anymore children she should get sterilised. Why is it his responsibility, Hmph? What happened to his body his choice
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:01 AM
5

She is so right. Privilege has been turned into something you can't disprove as no matter what evidence you show they can twist it to seem like it was all because of X quantifier in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:55 AM
1

It's so annoying how they use the term and refuse to believe it's sexist
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:24 AM
2

This actually makes sense. And isn't a smear or gender slur since men and women can be feminists which is unlike mansplaining which is tied only to men and this a gender slur
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:21 AM
5

I was training to be a nursery teacher but left due to excessive rules and guidelines I had to follow. However while the female staff were pleasant enough and we're accepting, I felt like the eyes of the world were upon me. When the kids gave me a hug or wanted to sit on my lap for story time a voice in my head said 'oh god please don't let anyone see this as they could freak out and accuse me of something sinister' I guess it was fear and paranoia that's been ingrained in me due to negative out…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:18 AM
41

"There’s a divide...For me it gets to the heart of why we need more women in politics. It's not just because it should be fair, it's just these are the sort of issues which they understand and the men don't Wow. Just wow. Let's see a man say that of women's intelligence and get away with it
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:49 AM
1

Brilliantly put. The 'by this person' opens the situation up to include another and just wouldn't be fair to assume they're guilty on claim alone
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:42 AM
1

They should take their claim seriously and investigate, nothing more. To believe them is to believe the accused is guilty before any facts or evidence has been collected, which isn't fair to the accused as its one persons word against another
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:40 AM
9

The picture is as shameful as the text. She's all "me, me, me" in the photo while the kid cries in the background Heck the photo disproves her argument. "How can I be a good mother?" Turn around!
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:33 AM
18

Quite new here and am not entirely sure if this fits but this Doctor who was speaking out against the policies and conditions of his workplace was being accused of Sexual crimes to remove him from being able to continue whistleblowing. The bosses made complaints about him to the GMC (General Medical Council), who then took it to the police, unbeknownst to him at the time, to remove him as a problem. I think that the sexual nature of half the crimes they tried to get him investigated for were due…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:23 AM
1

Would be highly amusing to see a guy change his kids nappy somewhere in the main restaurant floor then thenwhen told he can't, to show how their isn't an area for him as a man do so in private like their is for women
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:27 PM
1

Without thinking to ask of check if a man was at the urinal. Men have to ask. Women don't. Same with consent
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:26 PM
1

True and the staff in the video made no objection to him using the ladies' to make use of the facilities. But on principle the facilities should be in a gender blind location so instead of men encroaching on a female area neither men nor women would be in a location intended for the other gender
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:25 PM
2

While it was nice of the woman to offer to change the nappy for him it is rather patronising and presuming that he can't do it as well as her. No different from offering to carry something heavy for a woman which is considered benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:22 PM
4

I think it'd be worth a shot. Even if they wanted they couldn't reprimand you for suggesting something for the betterment of customers
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:14 PM
18

Good on. It is a sexist term to denigrate and dismiss what a man is saying. She could've said she found him to be condescending but instead chose to use a gender slur
/r/MensRights11/02/16 07:06 PM
5

You should suggest a change to the management
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:19 PM
2

They changed to have baby-change facilities in the first place. This is simply changing who can access them
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:18 PM
2

Men discriminated against and it's totally fine. And if you bring it to light you're probably considered in the wrong. Well done to this fella for highlighting the sexism of changing stations
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:16 PM
3

We do and have our organisations shut down for being sexists. College organisations for men's rights get shut down all the time as the college says feminism is for gender issues and feminist organisations on campus only promote female issues. Men aren't allowed to have issues or rights in modern society. Any organisation no matter how benevolent is assumed to be anti-women and doesn't get positive publicity or awareness. Check your Privilege
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:11 PM
9

Those gaps don't affect women so feminism doesn't give a fig
/r/MensRights11/02/16 06:08 PM
12

Love this part. Quote by Erin Pizzey "‘The CPS have recently been wrongly targeting men and it has got to stop,’ she said. ‘The CPS had no business going after him [Mr Pearson] because there wasn’t a case there from the very beginning. At the moment, women seem above the law. They can do it in domestic violence cases – simply pick up the phone, no evidence required, and have a man removed from his family and his children – and they can do it with rape, too.’"
/r/MensRights07/02/16 02:23 AM
4

Would you like your home invaded by military aged males who have no respect for your rights as a human being? Speaking as a person from a Country that's going to be taking in lots of immigrants I'd say no but then again I also wouldn't want my home invaded by military aged females who have no respect for my countries rights. Integrate or stay away
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:37 AM
2

I was about to post this. Thankfully common sense prevailed but she should be charged with wasting police time
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:30 AM
1

Modern feminism isn't really about rights but entitlement and making women feel victimised by everything due to men
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:57 AM
1

First thing I thought of. Sad how being pro-men is inferred as being anti-women.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:41 AM
5

Lord. How the hell was he sent down anyway? Where's the evidence other than someone's word? While the courts drag their feet he's in hell
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:38 AM
3

And while the judge takes a few weeks to decide about the social media record Tyler likely continues to be raped in prison
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:34 AM
1

So some random dude coulda been arrested for phantom rape because of this woman
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/16 06:26 AM
3

Great post. "it is believed" is a free-pass basically to hand these out to whomever they want without just cause. Let's say a guy gets Ito a fight defending a woman from assault. He's then party to that event and that can then be twisted into "this man was once involved in a assault against a woman (never mind he's a witness or defender) and therefore it is believed he could be a threat" so we hand him one of these orders because he was involved in said event even though he wasn't party to it an…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:53 AM
5

In UK law Rape only applies to men raping women. Women raping women or men and men raping men isn't classified as rape but assault and other terms. Ridiculous
/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:08 PM
5

Nice story. Sounds like you had a fun time without it having to be about sex and that's unique in society. Well done.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/15 07:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter