TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LegalIdea Archive

View 3 posts and 216 comments by LegalIdea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Legal RightsLegalIdea/r/MensRights19/01/21 05:23 PM
3

Activism/SupportLegalIdea/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:52 AM
2

Social IssuesLegalIdea/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
43

But you see, that's the plan. If has to be wrong, whatever the man did, simply because a man was the one who did something.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/26 12:51 AM
1

You're, actually, the inaccurate one here. Technically speaking, you're correct in that the federal agency could ignore the court order, they just are saying that they are not going to do so. https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/child-support/pay This is the court website for San Diego county, which explicitly states that the denial of the issuance or renewal of a passport is, and long has been, a potential punishment for not paying child support. The article merely indicates that the revocation of an…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:05 AM
8

Law student here. Yes, generally. Any CS enforcement action can be contested, included by entering into a suitable payment plan to pay off the arrearages. These actions are used when the money isn't being paid. I would also assume that requesting CS be changed could be done as well, but that's something you have to look into in your local area.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 06:12 PM
32

If you count surgical and abstinence options, men have 3 forms of birth control, and currently, only the surgery is required to be covered by insurance. Additionally, men have zero options after the sex is had Comparatively, women have options afterward, even though many are time-sensetive. The total number they have is about 30 or so. All but a couple are federally required to be covered by insurance.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 05:40 PM
6

The problem is that they kinda can't advertise that too much. Feminist groups that are massive donors to the democratic party have made it clear that they don't want the progress focused on men. They, by and large, don't really seem to care if the occasional man benefits, but men should not be the focus in their point of view. Unfortunately, these views often are oppositional, like scholarships or education reform for men, which feminists view as being harmful and oppressive towards women. The f…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 06:27 PM
5

Well, yeah, because fines as a criminal punishment aren't paid to the victim. He'd have to sue her for money He should sue her. He'd likely win, and win a lot of money
/r/MensRights16/07/25 06:18 PM
1

Set up a trip doing his favorite outdoors thing, or at least the best reasonable one (for example, I love hunting, but it's too expensive to be feasible to go from where I live right now; so instead, going fishing usually is easier)
/r/MensRights28/06/25 05:42 AM
12

Looking at the publicly available evidence, I am unsure of whether she killed him or not. The burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt Thus, if I were on the jury with only the information I have, I would vote Not Guilty
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:27 AM
10

I know. I'm helping our friend understand that while cutting your balls off is a type of castration, it isn't the only one.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 07:50 PM
14

That's called Chemical Castration
/r/MensRights26/05/25 07:44 PM
2

TL;DR In cases where defamation is being claimed regarding sexual assault or related offenses, the plaintiff is required to demonstrate malice, and the claim of defamation fails if it is determined by the court that the defendant reasonably believed her own statement to be true In plain terms, as long as there's a reasonably plausible explanation for her to believe her own statement, essentially that she felt she was telling the truth and the available evidence isn't enough to prove that she kne…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:00 AM
20

Gotcha. I guess I see the logic in that. It's still wrong as far as my views on the topic, but I'm not a UK citizen, so my opinion is of little importance.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:26 PM
35

Technically, his sentence was a minimum of 16 years, according to the article. Think essentially like life but eligible for parole after 16 years, if I understand their sentencing correctly
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:19 PM
2

Fair, and it wouldn't shock me if some did (likely "infomed" by the experience of a couple inmates or a nearby women's prison they minister at). Just clarifying for other readers that the churches, by and large, aren't responsible for this nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 03:45 AM
2

Actually, that would also be false, or at least somewhat misleading I am Christian, as is most of my family and many of my friends. Across the 14 different churches I have connections to, I don't know a single one that has the belief that too many women go to prison; with only a couple having the opinion of too many people go to prison. The remainder seem to think that simply don't comment on the number of people in prison and focus more on what to do th minister to them in prison or upon releas…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 03:38 AM
193

This is pretty much par for the course, unfortunately. He filed for divorce after she was arrested, and she's already pled guilty to the offense. However, in her divorce pleadings, she accused him of cruelty and gross neglect, which I'm venturing to guess is intended to mar his reputation, thus giving her hope of having some degree of custody or visitation upon resolution of her legal issues. Considering she's required to register as a sex offender, I don't see how this does anything that's actu…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 02:07 PM
3

It wouldn't just allow it, but could easily be interpreted to REQUIRE it. Simply define the rights of men as umpiring the rights of women, thus it is constitutional to restrict them further and any failure to at least attempt to take such action is unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:42 AM
9

Depends on the Hayden Rider This attache would alter the verbiage of the amendment as follows: Without the Hayden Rider: "Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex. "Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. "Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification." The Hayden rider adds this sentence: The…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:05 AM
5

no one ever asks, “Why did they feel unheard in the first place?” Nor are they ever going to. Feminist groups functionally rely on the idea that men have it better, with extremely few caveats. If they actually start acknowledging some of these complaints and their obvious logical following; people will quickly figure out that things aren't necessarily easier for men, just different. For example, a woman who complains that men aren't meeting her standards in dating would be told by feminists that…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 06:36 AM
4

That link doesn't link to a post at all
/r/MensRights15/03/25 03:15 AM
20

I have personally been to Japan and can tell you that the used panty things was no where near as common as you seem to think. A lot of tourists and military people stationed in Japan seemed interested in finding it and getting pictures. The vast majority never did or needed to literally be led to it. I also have a wife and daughter. While I agree that they shouldn't be harassed, banning single men from a public attraction in hopes of solving that problem is ridiculous and wrong
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:19 AM
5

She had a baby that was conceived during this time, but it can't be confirmed that he's the father
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/25 06:18 AM
4

Additionally, there's a decent number of women who believe that the person playing candy crush or whatever on their phone in a waiting room and your stereotypical gamer are the same. Reality is not kind when it hits them
/r/MensRights23/11/24 08:35 PM
6

so making another account wouldn't really matter since a lot of couples had separate accounts anyway? Not at all. It might be viewed as a little strange, maybe, but the law doesn't care if you do. i see, why does it work like that? Essentially, when dividing assets and debts, the courts look at who has the money to pay for the maintenance of debts (can make the payments or maintain the attached asset). Additionally, they look for assets to try to get the net value as close to equal as they can. …
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:23 PM
65

Well, yes and no Essentially, this would work for exactly as long as the marriage stays intact. Considering that there is no legal obligation to join finances and many couples keep separate accounts and share paying bills. However, upon a divorce, all financial accounts owned by either party are considered in the division of assets and debts. As such, if she ever does leave him in this scenario, the separate account is going to be treated as though it were a joint account, except without the ext…
/r/MensRights26/10/24 04:12 PM
11

In fairness, the two were separate instances. And the allegations weren't made until several months after the deployment, she just knew that we had witnesses between the two, so I'm guessing she thought that I'd not have evidence of my whereabouts at the time. I'll be fine. It sucked when it happened, but this was the better part of a decade ago.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 05:50 PM
50

It has happened by 2 different women The first one I caught cheating on me. Best I can figure, she wanted revenge that I ended the relationship at that point. She accused me of raping her a couple of months before that point (I happened to have been deployed at the time of the alleged incident). Second was my ex-wife. Accused me of raping her throughout our marriage, claiming that because I initiated sex and was the sole breadwinner, this put her in a position where her consent was basically imm…
/r/MensRights20/10/24 03:37 PM
1

Yes, and no In California, for example, receiving parent gets $100, paying back certain state aid programs gets whatever applicable amount, then receiving parent gets the rest, if there is any.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:28 PM
3

The forgiveness stuff is probably the biggest hurdle. In many states, child support is used to pay back the state for state aid like food stamps. Legally, forgiveness would effectively require the state to eat the difference, which they aren't likely to do. Otherwise, it looks good
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:24 PM
2

Not the exact quote but close enough. The problem with this framing is that it makes one group evil (the majority wolves) and one virtuous (the minority sheep). The framing is not to make the majority evil but indifferent. In the example of the wolves and sheep, the wolves aren't killing the sheep out of some evil hatred for them, but rather because their need to eat is important to them and they are indifferent to the needs of the sheep to stay alive. Similarly, in a strict democracy, the major…
/r/MensRights05/10/24 03:42 PM
3

The point behind the Electoral College is that we aren’t a strict democracy. A democracy was described by the founders as "2 sheep and 3 wolves voting to decide what's for dinner." Essentially, they didn't want specifically Virginia, New York, and Pennsylvania (the 3 most populous states at the time) to effectively rule over the other 10. The problem with using a simple, popular vote is the exact same as the modern EC. Both lead to very limited areas being the only ones that matter in the electi…
/r/MensRights05/10/24 03:01 PM
1

Indeed, if only actual sex countdown, I'd be at roughly once per month
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:00 PM
2

About once a month
/r/MensRights09/08/24 06:56 PM
2

I am in the middle of writing a novel and do a fuckload of reading fir work and school. Get fucked if you're mad that I want to play fallout every now and again to destress.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 07:01 PM
37

Exactly, because to tackle a problem, you must first acknowledge it's existence
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:45 AM
2

Hate to break the bad news to you, but if you're seeking a culture that has no history of participation in the above stated activities, I'm not aware of a single one that currently exists
/r/MensRights20/06/24 09:06 PM
3

Which tribe are you referring to here?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 08:11 PM
2

I'm sorry you're going through that, but I'm glad you have access to food.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:57 AM
2

That sounds terrifying. I would look into food pantries in your area or something, I'm honestly not sure what you have access to.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:45 AM
2

Ok Out of curiosity, what branch are you going into (I served in the marine corps for a little over 5 years)
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:44 AM
5

I'm not going to say whether the military would be a good fit for you, but I will give you some advice if you go that route Whatever branch you join you can make a career of, or do a few years and get out. Both will likely put you into a better circumstance than now. If you go that route, focus your MOS (job in the military, which you have some control over in the time before you ship to training) towards those skills. If you're worried about combat, go with the air force or navy. Both are less …
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:28 AM
17

Less a misconception and more a variation. Some, like the castrati in Italy, were cut in a way similar to your description. Enslaved eunuchs were usually cut entirely but depended on ruler and age.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 07:13 PM
4

Mostly because later encounters with feminist organizations were similarly hostile. In college, I was given a letter signed by 4 dozen people that they believed I was sexist because I stated my belief that mutual intoxication was not necessarily rape by explicitly the man.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:04 AM
5

For me, it would be when I reached out to a feminist group that had made an online thread, effectively claiming that all active duty men were abusers and rapists. As I was active duty at the time and was a virgin, I wanted to "do things the right way" and I asked how to go about doing so. Instead of explaining things to me, I was advised repeatedly and heavily to commit suicide. One particular comment I remember was as follows: "While I'm sure this nation approves of you joining, it is unlikely …
/r/MensRights13/06/24 11:37 PM
3

Paywall. Can't read it
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:48 PM
2

I agree with you. I just wanted to clarify that, regardless of that, the comments are correct. The empathy gap does need to be resolved, but there's gonna be a lot of social changes for that to happen.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:39 PM
11

While the comments are correct that this is a potential indicator of PPD (and quite a few other mental health issues), I also see the issue that a man would not be afforded such excuses. The individual situation already requires the wife to be given appropriate treatment, with possible consequences if she refuses treatment. The larger issue does need to be addressed, but I'm not sure how to make others be more empathetic. Most of the study of psychology I've done indicates that someone who doesn…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:34 PM
11

They did, and the groups still exist The Boy Scout organization has venturing crews under its umbrella (age 14-18, high adventure, coed, similar advancement to boy scouts). They have been around for a very long time, but that wasn't good enough (I went to a crew meeting a few times, and 90% of the members were male, mostly scouts from a few local troops)
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:57 PM
17

The point I think he's trying to get at is that the whole "beta male" thing is pointless and effectively becomes a "no true Scotsman" fallacy (as there really isn't objective standards for what makes a person a beta male, as such social standing doesn't exist, it becomes easy to claim that someone is a beta male because they do something that you, or whoever else, disagreees with). When we divide ourselves in this way, we weaken our own position because, in addition to the things we're fighting …
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:50 PM
5

USA, mostly California
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:17 PM
18

One for me is the favoritism in the courts eyes In my case (military veteran, divorcing with one kid plus one on the way), my now ex-wife had admitted in writing to attempting to file multiple false police reports against me, but still accused me of the same forms of abuse these reports were intended to support. To this day, no evidence of me abusing her has ever been supplied, her own testimony notwithstanding. I had accused her of a different form of abuse and provided multiple witness stateme…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:34 AM
1

Except that crash won't come.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 04:51 PM
6

Women don't, Japanese citizens do. The fathers in these cases are all foreign (mostly American or Australian). However, reverse the genders and the mother is then having the issues; something that I imagine happens less frequently
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:19 AM
1

i think its too late for me but i hope a positive difference will come as time moves on. It's not too late for anyone, as long as you are still breathing. I understand how difficult much of life can be, especially when people assume things are far more stacked in your favor than they actually are, and hate you based on that perception. If you (or anyone else who reads this) ever want to talk, feel free to message me. Completely confidential and I can offer advice or just listen. Whatever you are…
/r/MensRights02/03/24 07:32 AM
1

I am studying to become a therapist
/r/MensRights02/03/24 06:46 AM
14

Your guess almost seems unreasonably strict.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 06:32 AM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 05:27 AM
2

Then, I think it might be best for all parties involved if I don't get called back to service. Because I will have absolutely no patience for bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:14 AM
8

As a veteran in his early 30s, I honestly expect to be called back into service if the US ever gets into a "real war"
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:53 PM
1

Technically, it's viewed as beyond a reasonable doubt, as it's a quasi-criminal matter (the official charge being contempt of court) Where it gets interesting is that the courts only look at what was ordered and what was paid. So keep track of what you pay and have it somewhere you can demonstrate it (anything electronic with visible names and/or a check stub is sufficient)
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:55 PM
4

My favorite is the incarceration rates. I once had a woman explain to me that the reason that men go to prison more often and longer than men under comparable circumstances is because the criminal justice system unfairly discriminates against women by assuming that they couldn't commit the crimes. When I suggested that we remove this barrier and require equivalent sentencing, I was then told that such was misogynistic because I just wanted to make women be in prison with their rapists.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 07:50 PM
2

And likely only usable under certain circumstances (widowed, health conditions in mom, or unable to carry to term. Single men not allowed)
/r/MensRights01/12/23 08:43 PM
1

Ok I have several relatives in the "vaccines cause autism" crowd, and, considering that I am 3 classes away from a bachelor's in psychology, I get asked questions like that a lot.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:32 PM
1

Not exactly, no. At least not that I know of. It can give you similar symptoms, but I don't know of anyone who has actually acquired the condition in this way.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:19 PM
4

Referring to drugs like Adderall or Ritalin, both of which can be powerful meds for conditions like ADHD, but are also highly addictive
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:30 AM
3

Essentially, they start out by pointing out that men make more than women and that's unfair. But then it's inappropriate to point out the differences in how much and where they work
/r/MensRights09/11/23 08:44 PM
10

Where I grew up was an absolute shit hole for this kind of thing. One woman put in her profile that she expected to be given a cash deposit of $2,000 before you met. I, out of curiosity, asked if a guarantee of funds upon arrival would be sufficient and was told no, so I asked what ensured she'd actually show up and was told that I was being a misogynistic asshole for not trusting her.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:40 PM
2

That's a good option. Personally, were I in your shoes, I'd join the military, but only until I completed medical school and any further obligation I may have, then I'm out. But I'm also a bit of a cynic
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:18 AM
2

Having served, I can tell you three things First, standing up for what you believe is right is worth it, but you don't need the military for that Second, joining the military for any reason can be a great thing, but truly take the time to be careful with what you do. Otherwise, you'll eventually wind up in a lot of trouble Third, regardless of whether you join or not, have a civilian career as an option. That way, if you can't join, get hurt, get PTSD, or for any other reason don't make the mili…
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:14 AM
2

What I have usually advised when asked is that you do 4 things Work to obtain whatever goal you have, but also know when enough is enough. Whatever is enough for you, get there and stay there. Find things away from your employment that you enjoy. Use that as your hobbies and try to find others with similar interests. Try to learn new things when you can, and be willing to teach others who are willing to learn Unless the opinion comes from a person who matters to you, it is irrelevant to anything…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 07:33 PM
1

Not really, for 3 reasons 1, I'm too old to be drafted under current legislation (31) 2. As I have served in the military, I know that there are a lot of support roles that reduce your likelihood of seeing combat. Thus, if I ended up being called back, I could end up on the role I was previously in, or could get into something else, depending on what is determined to be prudent at the time 3. I'm fairly certain that hell would freeze over, and someone light the ice on fire before the draft would…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 06:18 PM
2

I could be wrong but the way I'm reading this is that she was given a life sentence with her first parole eligibility being at 9 years (considering what I know of the UK court system I'd willingly bet she's paroled at that time)
/r/MensRights04/10/23 06:08 AM
3

Been married, initially had sex a couple times a month or so, declined sharply to once or twice in the last year Been divorced, didn't have sex following divorce for over 2 years, and that was a ONS. Been remarried sex has stayed at a consistent once per month for the entire time. So far my efforts to increase have been unsuccessful
/r/MensRights04/10/23 05:59 AM
5

Agreed, but more so my point is that if we're both responsible for the child, I want to be there as more than just a source of money.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:11 PM
1

The other problem is the comparative cost of doing this. If I'm living paycheck to paycheck, the $300+ in court fees to file a lawsuit might not be a cost I can justify, even if I get a lawyer to take the case on contingency (no cost to me upfront, but they keep a portion of winnings at the end).
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/23 02:10 PM
14

3 things Whatever standards you want to require from me, is the marker I will use to judge your character. I won't judge your standards, just your own ability to meet them. While I am aware that pregnancy affects you more, they are still my kids and I still want to see them grow up, regardless of what happens to our relationship. I don't mind if you don't want to be in a relationship, or aren't in the mood for sex, or any other decision you make that impacts me. If I have a reason that impacts i…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 06:28 AM
4

I had a friend who became a super feminist. The last time we spoke was in 2012. I was getting ready to take a non-combat deployment with the marine battalion I was part of at that time. At this time, a couple of sailors had gotten arrested for sexual assault in Japan and this caused some issues, which I mentioned in answer to a question she asked (she wanted me to go do something, but I don't remember what it was, just that due to the situation, I didn't think it'd work out and I was right about…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:31 AM
5

Same
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:59 AM
11

I was politically active with a focus on improving life for kids after divorce of their parents
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:01 PM
7

My ex-wife was similar. Didn't work, adamantly refused to. This initially wasn't as much of an issue, as I was active duty and we could afford that; however she also decided that she wasn't going to bother to clean or cook. Instead, she just was going to watch Netflix, mostly. Since she couldn't drive, nor did we have a second vehicle, she frequently complained about being unable to spend time with friends, but a lot of our friends would talk to her about her unwillingness to help and she'd get …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:21 PM
0

My kids are a bit young in their understanding of giving gifts, so literally anything useful from them is fine As far as my wife is concerned, however, I don't really mind the gift as much as the clear level of thought and intention behind it. I know we're not doing the best financially, s ok if the gift is as simple as a good blowjob to wake up and getting to spend some of the day relaxing, followed by a good dinner, I'm ok with that. On the other hand, I'm going to be less ok with something li…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:59 AM
2

On the filing, the court will never stop you from filing an insanely stupid, frivolous or otherwise pointless lawsuit. Here's another example: (https://www.deseret.com/1995/4/9/19168705/inmate-sues-himself-for-5-million) This obviously isn't to say that the lawsuit will get anywhere (likely to get dismissed early)
/r/PussyPass16/10/22 06:29 AM
1

2 kids Married at23 divorced at 25 Married near her hometown, divorced 3 weeks after moving to mine I was responsible for all the bills, including what she spent Her total income across our marriage was less than $1000 ( like $35/month) Joint account Now love near her to be with kids, have no friends here Her parents and sister are divorced She still doesn't work
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 11:53 PM
1

This happened not far from where I live
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/22 04:17 PM
4

The biggest issue I see is the limitations and exclusions. For example, your car insurance only covers up to a certain amount. Would this insurance have that limit Or would it not cover certain situations, such as threesome's or swingers
/r/MensRights21/09/22 08:19 PM
1

If that's the case (not trying to say you're lying, moreso just mean that I'm taking you at your word as I have no reason to do anything else), I would simply suggest that the men in your life are just lazy individuals. If some reasonable compromise (they at least do some of the cooking/cleaning, or do it on certain days or whatever) can't be reached, I'd find a different way to celebrate holidays and politely decline to be involved in whatever is currently your situation. Once or twice ought to…
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:18 PM
1

As a divorced father, the best thing for your child you can do is press on. I know it's hard, and I won't tell you that it necessarily will get easier. Your child will remember you, if you're there for them. The mother might (probably won't) like it, but that's life. So instead be there and if you can, hire an attorney to help deal with the legal stuff.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 01:43 AM
2

Fair enough
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:17 AM
1

No problem. Feel free to tear it apart if you so wish
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:41 AM
1

Weird point on the matter, but a fetus is viable before 28 weeks. Dunno if it matters to you, just thought it was noteworthy
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:41 AM
1

My opinion is that abortion should be allowed for 3 weeks beyond whatever the maximum length of time that I can opt out as a father. Beyond that limit, abortion should only be legal for medical reasons.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:38 AM
1

I got banned from a couple different subreddits for being a "anti-choice misogynistic bastard". Weirdly, I also discovered that one of those subreddits existed in the first place by being banned from it
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:16 AM
5

The way I did it when I was still dating is I'd offer that I could pay up to a certain amount, and see what she'd say. A reassurance that she'd cover anything beyond that amount was usually a good thing, while anything along the lines of complaining about the amount was a red flag
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:06 PM
0

I can't say I disagree, but would expand with it simply being unfair to people regardless of how that plays out. While I'm not against compensation for emotional labor, what would and wouldn't qualify would have to be clearly defined (for example, if I am still thinking about work stuff on the drive home from work, does that count, even if I'm not required to do so?). Additionally, I can't say that I have heard of too many social workers or therapists becoming emotionally disabled due to things …
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:14 AM
2

Three questions here. All questions pertain to the US for clarity. I'm more than happy to explain legal points to the best of my ability. 1.federal law has required equal pay since November 1963 (Equal Pay act was amended to include gender, such amendment was signed into law in Nov 1963). Thus either the wage gap isn't actually due to discrimination (obviously a few anecdotal cases notwithstanding), or the federal law was ineffective in fixing the issue it is meant to fix. What do you think is t…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:36 AM
2

Native American person who is missing, has been murdered, or is assumed to be either of those things
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:40 PM
2

Actually, in Oklahoma, the seatbelt isn't required in the backseat for adults
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:04 PM
3

Perhaps a better way to look at Patriarchy is by looking at the question of is in what situations is it better to be male than female, and when is the inverse true. I am American, so I will use my own country here. When dealing with legal matters (divorce, criminal law, prisons, etc) it is unquestionably favorable to be female. A woman will have a lower average punishment for crimes, has a generally favorable divorce system, and is more likely to see an abuser of the opposite sex put to justice …
/r/MensRights22/02/22 02:28 AM
1

Killed Essentially a lot of censoring systems (meant to make stories SFW) will censor/ban for using killed, but not unalived, weirdly, which is what they are trying to avoid
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 12:42 AM
5

Depends I went on a first date with a woman who claimed to be a feminist, and actively stated that if she thought about drinking at any point, sex would be considered rape, and I would be charged accordingly On the other hand, my wife claims to be a feminist and actively helped me try to get a family court reform law passed via the initiative process.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/22 01:56 AM
8

She does understand that being raised well doesn't necessarily mean you have no possibility of growth as a person, right?
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/22 03:14 PM
3

I don't think anyone was "wrong" per se. Essentially, he set a boundary, she set one that was in conflict and the two could not be reconciled. Not necessarily right or wrong, but certainly seems petty and stupid on her part
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/22 03:08 PM
2

I think it also helps that, on a blow for blow comparison, an unarmed man will do more damage than an unarmed woman, all other factors being equal
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/22 03:10 PM
8

Joint legal custody generally means that any non-emergency decision must be with the consent of the other party.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 04:29 AM
15

If I am obligated to protect you, it's not oppression that I'm stronger than you, nor am I necessarily privileged for such strength
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:06 AM
20

The rape/child support thing was also the basis for the US Supreme Court case Hermesmann v. Steyer, in which a Kansas man was sued at the age of 18 for child support for a child he fathered with his then babysitter when he was 13. The court held that the states interest in ensuring that a child receives child support outweighs its interest in protecting minors from sex crimes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:28 PM
1

Let's see Been slapped, kicked (usually targeting the groin), punched (targeting the head and groin mostly), pushed down stairs, and had a few things thrown or swung at me (a shoe on a couple occasions, a hairbrush, a musical instrument, and a rock) Most by romantic partners, with a little from my mom
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:20 PM
2

Agreed, but either we have a presumption of innocence or we don't, you cannot have it both ways
/r/MensRights09/10/21 07:28 PM
2

Well, first I'd suggest putting them in like a mutual fund or something similar (low risk, low yield). This is for 2 reasons In most cases, a court cannot obligate the sale of an asset, and if it earns almost no interest, it might get left alone Second, if your ex can see it, she can ask the court for it (this isn't to say that she'll get it), but how do you ask for something that you don't know exists?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:05 PM
4

In a sense, I suppose. And while I don't agree with the way child support is now, I do recognize that it serves a purpose, even if it's intent has seemingly been lost. It should be used in the cases where the woman was a SAHM and the man just up and left of his own accord. This isn't as frequent as a lot of people seem to think, but it does happen from time to time. What child support is NOT supposed to be is a motivation to keep the father away from the kids, which seems to me to be it's most c…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:00 PM
6

Because it's Court ordered and you will lose a lot of things if you don't In order, as applicable: wage garnishment, seizure of income tax return, suspension of recreational licenses (hunting, fishing, etc), suspension of drivers license, suspension of occupational license, vehicle registration revoked, incarceration for up to 6 months. As a side note, license suspension order varies by state, and some will suspend all or several at once. Additionally, federal law dictates that not more than 50%…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 02:48 PM
3

Yes. I am in one, as my wife is genuinely concerned if I try to hide the emotional side of things
/r/MensRights21/09/21 02:34 PM
16

Child custody and related issues I'm a father of 2 kids
/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:42 PM
1

Good thing he’s a minor and would be tried as one… so even if convicted - it wouldn’t follow him into adulthood at all. Not necessarily true. Most states require a minor to register on the sex offender registry and continue it into adulthood up until a certain time after release (usually 5-10 years after release, but varies), others have charged people as adults down to the age of 10 (the handful of states with a legal minimum, it's usually 13 or 14, but a few 10 year olds were charged as adults…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 04:03 PM
48

Say something like this: Hi, my name is....... I work as an engineer doing....... I wanted to know why none of my female colleagues are expected to be on site. Put frankly, we could use their help, especially with projects they are more familiar with; and would like some clarification on the plan for them coming back to the office is, so we can arrange tasks accordingly.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:32 PM
1

Men as a whole, just acknowledging that we can and do get the short end of the stick sometimes is a good start. Men you're in a relationship with (whether platonic or romantic). They to help with whatever they are dealing with in the moment. Could be custody issues or workplace or something else. In regards to the legal system. Look at legal proposals and try to understand how they work. Ask yourself if you would be upset if the genders were reversed. If so, it probably isn't a good idea.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:41 PM
5

If you take offense to feminists are sexist idiots, we're talking about you
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:24 AM
1

Shits fucked up, and has been since Biden announced when US troops would be leaving. Basically, as I understand it, your options as a man are join the Taliban, hope they don't notice that you didn't join, or get executed. Women don't really have it much better, but seriously, the issue is that everything there's pretty much gone to hell
/r/AntiFeminists17/08/21 09:24 PM
4

At comparative points in their time as VP, yes Overall, I'm not sure, but imagine it's pretty close
/r/AntiFeminists03/08/21 05:06 PM
13

Probably nothing, for fear of reprisal after the 24 hours
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:49 PM
5

I understand the sub as a satirical firm of FDS, which is known for women having unreasonable and misandric viewpoints
/r/MensRights01/08/21 08:06 AM
2

The rest are inconclusive. There's not enough information to say that it was or wasn't rape. (In most cases, this refers to a question of consent, which generally, is difficult to prove outside of extenuating circumstances; like drugging the person or threats of violence)
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:05 PM
3

This actually does, and should apply to men as well For example, my fiancee and I have an agreement, when we go home at the end of the day, we both send a text saying that we made it home. I do the same thing with friends of either gender
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:42 PM
3

fetish and blood. This made me laugh
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:56 AM
0

Well, to be fair, it's a question of 2 different kids, not that it really makes it ok, but it does make sense
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:54 AM
1

The reason behind that is simple. The top brass will usually argue that they "would have resolved the issue appropriately, had they known about it". However, if you've already been through all the appropriate channels, that defense falls flat.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 01:35 PM
5

Two things First, the pay gap isn't a matter of sexism in the vast majority of situations (granted there's always going to be the occasion where it is, in both directions, but that's really quite uncommon). According to the most recent statistics I've seen, women make an average of 80% of men per year, but work an average of 87% of the hours, are more likely to leave the workforce due to familial reasons, and are substantially less likely to take on dangerous jobs (according to the bureau of lab…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 06:08 AM
1

I'm not sure if this answers your question, but when I got divorced, my ex-wife moved my kids 1200 miles away. She doesn't work and never has. So the guidelines for support were about $850 per month. I successfully negotiated a lower rate, in exchange for me taking on the cost of travel to visitation. Before anyone asks, I tried the split travel costs and she never paid her half. I took it to court and was told that they weren't going to impose a financial judgement against someone with no incom…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:18 AM
2

Ask her if she would agree with the following statistic being considered an example of institutionalized racism: according to DOJ statistics and a study done by University of Michigan, School of Law; a black person will serve 30-35% longer in prison Than a white person for comparable crimes. If she says yes, then follow up with: a similar study indicated that a male perpetrator will serve a 63% longer sentence than a female, which would thus indicate institutional sexism against men. She will di…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 07:36 AM
5

I don't think they were able to reach him for comment
/r/MensRights06/03/21 09:14 PM
5

shitting someone with their car and driving off. I realize this is both off topic and was unintentional, but that made me laugh As far as the sentence goes, I think it isn't necessarily a bad one, as opposed to the sentencing guidelines might be too lenient.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 04:01 PM
1

Unless the federal government steps in (beyond highly highly unlikely), it will probably take a while Simply put, those that would lobby against 50/50 parenting, have several states that would be unlikely to pass such change for some time. The other states could certainly move that way sooner
/r/MensRights02/03/21 01:40 AM
7

The stigma is two-fold. On the one hand, men in general are expected to take care of themselves and military veterans are viewed that way to an even higher degree, as the general thought process is that they must be tough enough to handle whatever happened in country, or anywhere else for that matter. On the other hand, when someone has a mental break, they're more dangerous than they would normally. This is something most people are generally aware of, even if subconsciously. Military veterans …
/r/MensRights14/02/21 07:56 AM
1

And to those who don't know otherwise, other than honorable and less than honorable are interchangeable. I have seen veterans make that mistake and the person you replied to probably doesn't know the difference instinctively, If anyone here is the failure point, it's you
/r/MensRights07/02/21 06:43 AM
2

Ok I see the problem here I understand "less than honorable" to essentially mean that honorable means thus and anything that doesn't mean as much means less than. However, you understand it differently. That makes more sense
/r/MensRights07/02/21 06:26 AM
1

General, under other than honorable conditions
/r/MensRights07/02/21 06:04 AM
1

Theres no such thing as a less than honorable discharge Right here
/r/MensRights07/02/21 05:42 AM
2

Actually, there are 5 types of discharge Honorable General (under honorable conditions) General (under other than honorable conditions) Bad conduct. (Requires Special or General Court Martial) Dishonorable (requires General Court Martial)
/r/MensRights07/02/21 01:24 AM
4

Nice Glad to have served, even if after you, brother
/r/MensRights05/02/21 12:57 AM
5

If you don't mind me asking, what branch were you in I was USMC from 2011-2016
/r/MensRights05/02/21 12:09 AM
1

Perhaps, I also wouldn't be surprised if her terms of suspended sentence were somehow related to it.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 07:25 AM
2

Agreed, and based on the article, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge required that problem be resolved, but I didn't see anything specific
/r/MensRights01/02/21 07:17 AM
7

2 years, assuming that she doesn't have any further legal trouble. The other 8 are considered served, if you go that length of time following whatever conditions the judge sets (usually, some form of counseling and any legal trouble leads to incarceration for the right suspended years on top of the sentence for the new issue
/r/MensRights01/02/21 06:23 AM
2

I cannot accept online signatures, unfortunately. But I can set up a petition to the UN human rights commission, that way it would be something your signature applies to. Let me figure out the process behind that, and I'll get back to you on it
/r/MensRights19/01/21 09:21 PM
3

Outstanding, I'm waiting on the official documentation from the Secretary of State (should be here any day) then I can send you a link to where you can sign it and scan the sheet, or I can bring a copy to you. Either works for me
/r/MensRights19/01/21 06:02 PM
10

If passed, would require the court to refer allegations of criminal conduct in child custody cases to be investigated. Investigating authority would be required to submit a report to the court detailing their findings, and pursue relevant charges. If the allegations are proven false, charges of perjury are to be pursued. If allegations are not proven true, they are to be dismissed with prejudice. Judges would be required to provide a written decision on all custody decisions except: cases that a…
/r/MensRights19/01/21 05:57 PM
2

Well I guess you have no time to waste
/r/MensRights12/01/21 07:10 PM
5

If this is in the US, you could look into a lawsuit under Title IX.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 05:41 PM
7

To answer your question I don't mind working with feminists, online usually ends up being okay, with a few exceptions for me In person, however, it's a whole different thing. I have been called a lot of things, accused of crimes I didn't commit, and told things similar to and including "you are proof that some people just be taken out of society and just put down". Sometimes I don't have to say anything more radical than that the equal pay act made paying women less federally illegal decades ago…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:07 AM
6

I'm just a translator of the weird wording, I don't speak on anything like that
/r/MensRights30/12/20 10:52 PM
19

That if they brought their son up to be only attracted to women it would violate his human rights
/r/MensRights30/12/20 10:46 PM
17

I would assume so and would be happy to collaborate with you.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:06 AM
3

Well Kinda a mix of a few places. The idea that men cannot be victims is from feminism, but it's based on things that come from other sources Essentially, the ideas that cause a lot of male oppression, come from generalizations and stereotypes that are based on things from other sources, but the generalizations are courtesy of feminism, for the most part
/r/MensRights25/12/20 01:04 AM
3

Don't fuck her Ever Don't let her reproduce
/r/MensRights16/12/20 02:17 AM
2

As the article states, no probably not If you're the college student or will be soon, I would suggest a camera with audio recording, and hopefully you can defend yourself at that point
/r/MensRights15/12/20 09:29 AM
1

Agreed, unfortunately that doesn't happen as often as it should happen
/r/MensRights30/11/20 10:04 AM
1

To be clear, I wasn't referring specifically to the Eton fiasco, I don't know enough about that to say much one way or another I'm referring to the situation as a whole, where essentially the problem is that there's very little grounds for a wrongful termination type of lawsuit, if such grounds exist at all
/r/MensRights30/11/20 09:51 AM
2

Here's the problem The person isn't being terminated because of a criminal conviction They are being terminated for being or creating detrimental publicity for the company. This is legal because someone saying something tremendously racist is legal, but logically, firing them should be too
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:51 AM
4

Wouldn't I have to be a leftist for that?
/r/MensRights27/11/20 05:50 PM
3

Exactly, some (myself included) are working to change things. Hopefully this effort will be successful, but I imagine that I will have made plenty of "feminist" enemies by this time next year.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 10:42 PM
5

Check your laws, she may have entrapped you under false pretenses(lying about birth control/reproductive coercion or sabotage) could give you reduced child support. Assuming this is in the US, this is actually false In addition to being nearly impossible to prove outside of texts clearly stating that she's on birth control and some form of proof that she wasn't, the US Supreme Court, in Hermesmann v Seyer, ruled that the states interest in collecting child support was unchanged, even in the case…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 10:25 PM
1

From a legal standpoint, your best bet is to not have sex with her again. You probably shouldn't cut contact entirely, but be very limited in your contact with her and what is public on your social media. if you can, try to find out if she decides to keep the baby, without directly asking her, as she may not tell the truth. Facebook is usually a fantastic way to accomplish this, but it depends on the person. In the instance she does keep it, you don't have many options, as essentially she can de…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 10:17 PM
1

True
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:20 PM
1

. It's possible that women try to kill themselves even more than men, but they just aren't as successful as men. I read once that statistically, women attempt suicide almost 2x as much as men, but men are just slightly under 3x as likely to commit suicide as women. Now, of course the statistics could be my poor memory, but I do know that the most commonly cited reason for this discrepancy is that women tend to favor methods that are less messy and hopefully less painful. (The three most common m…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 06:03 PM
12

I'm actually going to be introducing a ballot initiative to help in some areas next year
/r/MensRights31/10/20 03:45 AM
3

The reason behind the 2 party consent to record laws is that sometimes people are completely different when they know they're being recorded. As far as the evidence being thrown out, any evidence obtained illegally is thrown out and should be thrown out. Following the opposite to it's logical conclusion leads to a lot of problems in the opposite way As a side note, put a sign in your office stating that you may be recording and that conversation is thus consent to record. Ensure it is in plain v…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 04:25 PM
1

3 ways If the issue in question is one where you actually get the bad end of things, assert as normal, until equality is reached If the issue is one that is roughly even or you are unsure of the issue, leave the matter alone or handle it in specific regard to your individual circumstances If the issue is one where women are favored, help us gain the traction needed to fix it
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:16 AM
2

Yes, and no in that order Yes there's a higher court, court of appeals that deals with situations where a judge has decreed something and one or both parties disagree and want it reviewed No, generally speaking, you can't sue the judge. The principle of qualified immunity prevents them from being sued in the course of their work. You could file a report with the ABA (American Bar Association, a regulatory agency and professional association for lawyers and judges)
/r/MensRights06/09/20 07:07 PM
2

There's one exception on the children, and that's only in the case where the children are not biologically related to one party or the other. For example, I have 2 kids from a failed marriage. If I were to set up a college fund for them, I can include that on a prenup if I remarry, to ensure that such money is not included in divorce filings.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 02:28 PM
1

I never suggested that the men needed to be better than anything other than the hostile response I see complained about every single day. Either the hostility we get from feminist subreddits for being male is wrong and we, in turn should not stoop to that level, or the hostility we get isn't wrong and we shouldn't complain about it.
/r/MensRights30/08/20 02:15 PM
8

One thing I want to add To the women of this subreddit, thank you for your time and feedback. It is appreciated far more than you know To the men, treat the women well. We all get annoyed about being mistreated by women in female dominant areas of life. Let's show them how to do it better
/r/MensRights30/08/20 05:30 AM
1

Mine (WA) and my ex-wife (CA) are both 2 party
/r/MensRights29/08/20 06:26 PM
9

Not everyone who does this does it to unsolicited dick pics I had a woman ask me for a dick pic, then proceed to make fun of me for being small. She later asked if that was ok with me, and because I was being a fucking idiot and am an emotional masochist, I said it was fine. I then tried, quite successfully, I think, how much her "sexy" attempts at a humiliation fetish were bothering me
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:15 AM
1

Be careful about recording laws on this One way to get around the 2 party rule is with a dash cam, but that's pretty much it
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:08 AM
21

Because, while individual feminists are usually ok with helping us, feminist organizations are almost exclusively not. For example, most people would consider joint custody (when there's no abuse and both parents can parent) to be equality. Both sides get 1/2 of the time and 1/2 of the responsibility. The NOW (national organization for women and the largest feminist organization in the US) has outright opposed this idea for years, and is likely to continue to do so
/r/MensRights29/08/20 05:04 AM
10

From a subjective standpoint, life has not been easy From an objective standpoint, I don't know how you would measure that
/r/MensRights22/08/20 12:15 AM
7

That's certainly a very unique case, and I'm not a lawyer First thing I would tell you to do is to have A get on a payment plan with the court for the arrears. This can be done via telephone appearance. Step 2 is to give C notice, in writing, that A will be visiting his daughter on (date, time, location, supervisor). I don't imagine she'll show up but that's part of the process. Then file, in the same court that the child support goes through, requesting an enforcement visitation of and modifica…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 04:05 PM
3

Statistically, if you include cases where men are forced to penetrate their assailant as rape, men are raped at a comparable rate to women
/r/MensRights14/08/20 03:52 PM
2

Very I'm glad it has gotten better somewhat, but it's still depressing at times. I'm working through it
/r/MensRights03/08/20 09:00 PM
2

Thanks I have gotten help and am in a much better place now than I was then As far as my kids, I still fight for them and am in their lives as much as I can be I'm sure you were on eggshells for the whole marriage..... Trust me, you don't want to be in the position and frame of mind I was in. Eggshells was a good day, on a bad day, I was literally trying to volunteer for combat in hopes of death
/r/MensRights03/08/20 04:58 PM
2

I don't mind putting mine here, as I'd rather people learn from it, in hopes that no one else will have to endure these things In my case, I married a woman in March 2015. This marriage was something I had looked forward to, and hoped would last until death. Unbeknownst to me at the time, I was the only one in the marriage who felt this way. Within a few weeks of getting married, virtually everything about her changed, and I still am not entirely sure why. Where before, we would go on adventures…
/r/MensRights03/08/20 03:57 PM
1

I agree with you entirely, they should do something
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:31 AM
1

Well, in fairness, the Ravens cannot fire Kimberly Davis, nor can the NFL As far as why Baltimore PD is doing nothing, I don't know
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:05 AM
9

Not directly, at least not to my knowledge That said, the slow constant movement towards the most extreme explanation of the Duluth model (which, at it's extreme, would allow for literally any harm done to men blamed on men as retaliatory violence for some other wrong done to someone), does seem to give the ones who already want to an implied justification
/r/MensRights22/07/20 04:32 AM
1

Better a robot and useful, than emotional and useless
/r/MensRights21/07/20 09:33 PM
1

The solution I've found works best is to try to avoid having emotions at all. This, from what I've been told, doesn't necessarily bode well for a relationship, but neither does having emotions, so pick your poison I guess. Fact of the matter is that some women and most men will attack you regardless of whether you have emotions or not. If you do, you're soft, weak, or something similar; if you don't, you're cold, cruel or too fragile for emotions. So, to guys like me who want to have a relations…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 08:00 PM
3

Even with US military regulations, both army and marine ranks would not be visible on the woman in this position
/r/MensRights15/07/20 11:13 PM
14

I'm glad people are starting to recognize the reason we stay silent Me for example, I have my issues (mostly depression, if you want to know), but I try to avoid sharing that with a partner or potential partner because nothing good ever really comes from sharing it, thus making it a needless risk
/r/MensRights12/07/20 06:17 PM
5

You'd be surprised My ex would uppercut me in the balls and pushed me down a flight of stairs I never hit her back not because I'm exceptionally patient but because I knew I'd risk a lot if I did
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/20 07:33 AM
2

Not at all, no
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:07 PM
1

Generally speaking, yes There's exceptions, but I don't think it's wise to rely on you getting it allowed in court on an exception
/r/MensRights29/06/20 01:11 PM
0

From a legal standpoint, probably recording the entire thing in video and audio, in such a way that she won't be aware of the recording is the best bet. Clearly get her consent before and clearly get her to say that she enjoyed it afterwards. She still could claim coercion, inability to consent, or something else. Additionally, that only works if you're in a place that requires only one person know about a recording. Some places, like where I live, require both parties be notified of recording, …
/r/MensRights29/06/20 06:26 AM
10

True, except that failure to register is a felony, which thus removes your right to vote upon conviction
/r/MensRights29/06/20 12:56 AM
1

You can. Best course of action is to know the person who you are having sex with. If possible, text the person and tell them how much you enjoyed it afterwards, and try to get them to respond in kind. Also, you're gonna want to save up a little bit of money, and if accused, hire a private defense attorney. If nothing else, put up a camera that covers your bedroom, and then pay close attention to your partner and make sure they don't withdraw consent. The idea being that you should try to put the…
/r/MensRights26/06/20 04:19 PM
5

Yes you can It happens literally all the time
/r/MensRights26/06/20 05:24 AM
2

I don't think I've ever worked with you personally before, so in the interest of making progress I have an idea Message me with an legal issue from the female side you want to see addressed and I'll write up a proposal on how to fix it. (Can include funding, changes in policies, whatever. I can't help you with stuff that's already illegal) I'll reply with an important issue and we'll see what progress we can make together
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:32 PM
3

I'd be interested in working together Problem being, most feminist women I've tried to work with are happy to accept my help for what they want, but are not interested in helping with anything else, sometimes actively undermining my efforts
/r/MensRights14/06/20 07:21 PM
3

I'm not from the UK, so maybe this is bugging my American brain more than it should, but I don't see how it is right for a domestic abuse protection order to be kept in place when the person who it's against is acquitted of the same charges
/r/MensRights12/06/20 07:32 AM
3

Why, though
/r/MensRights06/06/20 07:39 AM
6

How the fuck does that happen Like, seriously, how the fuck do you watch someone shove their hand up someone's ass and decide to punish the recipient for over reacting
/r/MensRights06/06/20 07:37 AM
10

Unfortunately, the problem is a lack of evidence Most rape cases, whether true or false have only 2 witnesses, the alleged victim and the alleged perpetrator. Barring any information that would undermine the testimony of one or the other, the two usually equal each other out, so finding proof is difficult. Sadly, I have come across a number of feminists who believe and have advocated for changing the burden of proof to where the victims testimony is enough for a conviction
/r/MensRights01/06/20 10:23 PM
15

Well That depends on what you mean by a lot Demonstrably false cases, to the point of objective evidence beyond a reasonable doubt? Probably about 5%, including cases that are ONLY proven false when the accuser admits to making it up Cases that are false, regardless of amount of evidence? Most estimate that would be around 35% or so, including cases of mistaken identity, where the victim actually was raped, but the wrong person was accused of the crime
/r/MensRights01/06/20 10:11 PM
3

To use my personal experience regarding divorce as an example When my divorce and subsequent custody battle began, the following occurred. I was accused of: kidnapping my own daughter, rape, domestic violence and many other things. Kidnapping was the only one in which a date of the alleged crime has been provided. The allegation of domestic violence stated: "Husband (me) during the marriage engaged in conduct that was physically and psychologically abusive." That's it. No date, no clear indicati…
/r/MensRights01/06/20 07:59 AM
4

Egalitarian- someone who believes that the gender of a person should have no bearing on their accomplishments or their ability to pursue their goals. Feminist- someone who believes that equality between the genders should be pursued, as long as any such changes do not negatively affect those of the female gender
/r/MensRights31/05/20 05:10 AM
5

To answer your question plainly, no one says that they necessarily don't, per se. A lot of court rulings rely on precedent, meaning they will look at past similar cases to help interpret the law. This should change when higher court rulings (like Stanley v Illinois) dictate otherwise. Unfortunately, that often takes time. Part of the problem is that some judges don't like having to change the way they interpret the law. Thus the changes following the switch from the "tender years" doctrine to "b…
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:48 PM
1

Do it. Hopefully that will end some of the bullshit
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:14 PM
1

True, but I meant in a court, to where essentially, as long as the woman says you did it, you're convicted unless you can prove you were like in a coma or on another planet
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:05 PM
2

How much do you want to bet the next thing will be to removal of cross-examination against the accuser
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:04 PM
1

Does this help in cases where the accusation doesn't lead to criminal charges (Divorce cases for example)?
/r/MensRights26/05/20 11:53 PM
1

The first part of the process is to file a motion with the court of your intention to move out of state. Ensure that your daughters mother is notified of your intentions before you file, AND receives a copy of your motion. The matter will go before the court, and you seem to have a good argument for your plans, but I would strongly recommend being ready in the instance your motion is denied
/r/MensRights26/05/20 02:44 PM
1

Worst case postpone the decision until your employer tells you how many hours you'd have been working. That's what eventually ended up happening, but mostly because her attorney had the common sense to ask for time for more information It also doesn't excuse the blatant favoritism where your ex lied and mislead the court and that was totally fine, but your very accurate and truthful statement would have held you in contempt of court. I'm not trying to excuse that, but the fact of the matter is s…
/r/PussyPass11/05/20 03:44 PM
1

Unfortunately, he'd technically be kinda correct and kinda incorrect For divorce, you have to submit forms detailing income and expenses, which I did, but I was unemployed when I submitted it. So on the one hand, you could say that since I got hired, I should know about how many hours my employer intended for me to work. On the other hand, the only job I've ever had where my hours matched my expectations upon hire was the military, because I expected to work a lot of hours. Seeing as this was a …
/r/PussyPass11/05/20 03:27 PM
1

Most likely, they are investigating anything in his system or injuries that would have contributed to his death. Among these are drugs and alcohol. Additionally included would be older injuries that compounded to cause his death, when without them, he would have survived. For example, if he had previously had a concussion from a blow to the head, then died from a brain injury, that would be worth noting A third thing would be the incident itself FVO normally states that the person the order is a…
/r/PussyPass11/05/20 08:46 AM
1

You'd be correct As I've been going through my divorce, outright misleading the court by my ex-wife and her attorney is ignored, but one judge got openly stated that he considered holding me in contempt when I explained that I didn't know how many hours I would work in an average week, because I got hired same day as the court hearing. My exes attorney actually stepped in and asked the judge to set aside the issue so they could produce more accurate information. We've since gotten a new judge, t…
/r/PussyPass11/05/20 07:45 AM
3

If I do the same task as a woman, and if the measurement is at all subjective, chances are people will think I did a better job. Depends on the circumstance. If the task involves parenting or caring for child, the opposite is sometimes true. In the field of education, women are generally viewed as more competent, with the extreme viewpoint being that male teachers became teacher to sexually exploit their students and/or the students mother's. Both the discrepancy in perceived competence and the …
/r/MensRights11/05/20 07:07 AM
6

I'm no expert on this, but I don't think it's possible to the y chromosome from sperm
/r/MensRights11/05/20 06:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter