TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Legitimate_Desk_9275 Archive

View 5 posts and 110 comments by Legitimate_Desk_9275 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Where is that amazing women's intuition right now? You women have been saying this all the time, you can see a horrible man from a first date and that's why you don't pick them. That you have the sixth sense seeing who is a good partner and who isn't. You women have been saying all this time that the reason a man didn't get picked was because you women saw something "bad" in them and thus the man needs to "improve" themselves. That, my friend, is true victim blaming and emotional abuse. Holding …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:03 AM
27

So what you are saying is, women always pick the objectively best men to date?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:18 PM
3

This implies there is nothing to improve about the world. Because in the end, what's the best already happens because "the market" chose it and therefore it's the best. Kind of insane tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:53 PM
1

This is circular reasoning. A man is valuable because market chooses him and because what market chooses is valuable. Doesn't really mean anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 10:46 PM
–

The attention men get--- even if small is genuine and respectful for the most part. Oh yeah? Men have gotten nothing but shit on by women on social media, for decades. Men are pigs, we prefer bears, kill all men, men are the problem, men should feel shame about this and that. While at the same time even slightest annoyance men have towards women is considered incel behaviour. In the mean time we get constantly rejected when attempting to approach women. So don't talk about shit you know nothing …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:43 PM
–

And being seen as an emotionless ATM machine is not?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 07:57 PM
–

but the truth is nobody wants to listen to a man whine Your lack of character is not a truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 10:02 PM
4

FYI, 52% of white women voted for Trump. So much for the progressive women. And men are right to think that feminists hate them when they clearly do. Maybe they should consider changing their approach and how they speak about men if they want their support.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:57 PM
-10

All feminists think they advocate for all women and I haven't heard many women argue otherwise, so I use those terms interchangeably.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:55 PM
0

There are actually studies which show that women's automatic in-group bias is much stronger than men's. But also from personal anecdotes in daily life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:29 PM
0

This depends on whether they are capitalists or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:26 PM
-4

I definitely did not blame every issue on women. I blame that women focus way too much on women's issues alone. Besides, isn't this what women have been doing for decades, blame everything on men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:24 PM
-4

women have brought up men’s issues frequently They really haven't and this seems like an extreme gaslight. I've probably heard once or twice in my life a feminist with major influence talk a single word about men's issues. Even if they do, they make sure to say it very, very quietly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:22 PM
-3

I think men care about societal issues but have no strong bias towards other men specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 11:20 PM
-2

“men’s issues” Putting men's issues in quotation marks is such an utterly disgusting, despicable and hateful thing to do, I have truly nothing to say to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 10:57 PM
2

Let's normalize not assuming shit about people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 09:11 AM
1

All those groups are imaginary. There is no "men's group" responsible for "men's actions". Just individuals who are responsible solely on their own behaviour (and their underage children's behaviour). Grouping people like this is exactly what racists do. I see this as no different.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:10 PM
33

Yep - women are always right and men not getting relationships are just icky. But if for some reason women choose shitty partners as the selectors, even though they are perfect, then all men are pigs. There's never accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:04 PM
27

That's the just world fallacy - plenty of people do everything right in life and still fail. If you look at this world and our leaders for a second - does it really seem to you that "good" people rise to the top? There is no meritocracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:02 PM
29

Because of their dishonesty. No matter how much women say they want men who are emotionally open, their choice of romantic partners constantly show the exact opposite. Every men see this constantly in their daily lives and its maddening.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:09 AM
2

"Guys, are our debate opponents wojaks while we are gigachads?" "Yes, defintely!"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:44 PM
–

Not to mention, those who are alone have much less motivation to work, so they will fall behind more and more every year. It's much harder to be completely self motivated when there's no family supporting you or someone to provide for. I can live extremely frugally by myself, I don't need much of anything, and that probably makes many women think I'm a "loser".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:39 PM
6

Is this just another way of saying "Men should remain silent about their struggles and not bring up societal issues effecting them"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 01:24 PM
3

My issue with your argument that "it's all a scam" is that you are making it a caricature instead of actually deep diving into a societal phenomena and investigating it more deeply. And that argument "It's all marketing" becomes pretty nonsensical when you realize that you can say that about any movement that ever existed. I could say that feminism was simply marketing. That it planted seeds inside women's heads that they were oppressed victims and they needed to be "liberated" sexually. How doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 09:07 PM
3

Oh bollocks. That is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory. Not everyone out there is to get you. You try to paint them as brainwashed idiots because that way the responsibility lies entirely on men and women need not think about their own actions, yet again. You can't admit that the way men act is a direct consequence and counter reaction for feminism and how society treats men. Those influencers did not plant any seeds, but they have answered to the real needs these men have. It's the same thing wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 08:22 PM
0

You know, I could say the same "Society was functioning when we pretended the desires of half the population shouldn't matter" About women and feminists too. When have feminists given fuck about men? Then you hit me with the Saudi Arabia straw man. Extremely low IQ. I'm not going to argue with someone who obviously have no good intentions to begin with and try to shape my words into your stupid victim narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:57 PM
0

Muh victimhood. Your posts are lame. I was talking about what keeps society functioning and you come here with "how can I make this about myself and my poor suffering"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:52 PM
2

And people buy the "product" because there is demand for it. And why is there demand for it? Because no one else gives a fuck about men or their issues. Men have been told their entire lives that they are bad, they are the cause of all the problems, that masculinity is bad. Men have seen that it is acceptable to publicly mock men, shame men, despise men while having to walk on eggshell when talking to women. Now what does manosphere offer for men? Understanding. Empahty. A place to talk about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:46 PM
0

"Society was functioning when we pretended the desires of half the population shouldn't matter" That's not what I wrote, dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:26 PM
0

Yeah, I have come to the same conclusion. Those conservative ideas and traditions were things that kept the society in order and functioning. People having complete freedom to do anything and everything will lead to chaos, anarchy and "winner takes all" world. It turns out, people can't just do whatever, huge civilizations need some form of control and social contracts in form of "traditions" to exist. Traditions were protecting us from ourselves. People who are left out will radicalize until th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:24 PM
13

"Nice guy", just like "incel", is a word that has completely lost ist original meaning. It's just a word people throw around when they want to insult someone. Would be best if you just ignored its existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:11 AM
1

Someone's a walking red flag lmao. Clearly thinking is not a woman thing, at least in your case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:28 PM
–

You sound extremely unintelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:23 PM
–

Listening these takes make me wonder, are women not capable of conscious thought and are they purely acting on a low animalistic impulses? Because many women and some men here seem to argue for this to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 02:40 PM
3

I honestly think that most decent men have given up long ago. They have been shamed into never making moves because it makes women uncomfortable to ever approach them anywhere. That's what has been told to us. The men left in dating pool are mostly the ones with no morals and those who have mastered "the game" of manipulating women into making them feel exactly right at every given moment so that they would fall for them and not get "bored". Most decent men have better things to do than chase wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 07:15 PM
1

Where is that skittishness? This sub is basically a place where people say things they are not allowed to say out loud anywhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 03:39 PM
9

Men’s “dating struggles” Immediately invalidates/dismisses men's dating issues and frames them as illegitimate. boil down to some men not being able to easily date or have sex with the women they want when those women women don’t want to date or have sex with them Reframes men's dating issues as an extremely simplified straw man. are you suggesting that everyone should be criticizing women for not dating and having sex with men they don’t like? Makes counter argument against the straw man. If so…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 03:38 PM
–

Men like this would be smart enough to hide their red flags from women. They wouldn't be talking red pill theories to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:55 PM
–

Is women wearing high heels a sign of insecurity in women also, then? Since they are also trying to make themselves taller. Surely that would make sense, they are identical scenarios. Are women hiding their face behind layers of makeup insecure because they are hiding their faces? Are women wearing push-up bras insecure about their body?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:41 PM
–

Men do a thing - sign of weakness, insecurity Women do the same thing - makes them feel good, empowers them PPD in the nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 11:31 PM
–

Be the real alpha man now and have some balls to make an actual argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 08:57 PM
13

Again, actually respond to the u/SecondEldenLord's post, instead of deflecting and shaming techniques. No one cares about your moralistic judgements.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 08:54 PM
19

You didn't actually respond to his argument, but tried to deflect it by saying that men demanding equal treatment are babies. Therefore I must assume that you don't actually have an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 08:45 PM
2

Yeah sure. It's just word salad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 08:34 PM
3

That's fine. Your refusal to understand that conditional and transactional aren't the exact same thing is your decision to make. This is nothing but semantics. It doesn't matter if I call it condition or transaction. Then can you please make some sense to me? All I see is "I didn't mean that, I was pointing out this, semantics this". Like, summarize what the hell are you talking about because I don't have time to spend 10 hours trying to cipher the actual point of your comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:26 PM
4

Again, none of that really convinces me in any way. Relationships are transactional, plain and simple. A relationship where one receives more than other will surely fail. Your friends don't call you or invite you to anywhere, surely you will eventually stop calling them. I find it hilarious, really. Repeatedly, we see women go for the men who have the looks, money, status and power. And yet, actually these women were looking for "companionship" or something. HAH. In the first world women make ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:08 PM
5

Every fucking relationship in the world is transactional or conditional, except maybe parent's love for their children. Yes, men want sex. That's one of the conditions and benefits of a relationship. And woman want what, access to the man's money, his protection, him fixing things in the house? Like you said, women also want things from men. Get off your high horse already. I could as easily say: "So women have no morals, values, integrity, ethics, etc. They just pretend to be whoever they have …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:29 PM
3

I didn't say all men. Many men have stopped playing this game because they have integrity. Most people in this world have no morals, values, integrity of ethics. If you haven't noticed. Besides, it's funny how high the bar is for men (always have high morals, values, integrity and ethics) when reading the women here make the argument that they are slaves to their biology and instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:53 PM
12

And yet, you are absolutely doing the same thing. The clothes you buy, the makeup, it's all for validation and approval. Women asking their friend groups what do they think of this man? Social approval. Humans are social animals that crave for social validation. I'm sure if a woman got absolutely zero attention from men (not even a glance, when she is wearing a nice dress, from absolutely anyone), she would have very low self esteem about her femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 05:49 PM
3

Ironically, you are right. If women stopped having casual sex, men would have to adapt and become "husband material". That would reward men for being kind, considerate, nice, etc. But since you are giving sex for free for attractive men, they don't necessarily need to commit to you. Like I've said previously, it's literally a problem women have created themselves. Men are only acting in the way which gives them the most success with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:20 PM
1

Everybody understand the importance of mutual desire. That's not the issue here. You see, the argument men make is that women have such inflated egos because dating apps make them feel like celebrities, where even an average woman can get hundreds of messages and matches daily from men. They get constant validation. Same with social media like instagram where they can post a bikini picture and get thousands of likes from thirsty men. This completely fucks up women's brains. This creates illusion…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 03:11 PM
–

Yes, men are objectively more accountable than women. Every time men have it rough, it is solely blamed on the man himself. He needs to work on his personality, he needs to improve himself, and so on. Every time women, or some minority group, has it rought, it is a societal issue. The blame is put onto the society for "oppressing" women. Wahh wahh I don't earn as men do much because SOCIETY is OPRESSING ME! Literally everything feminists have ever done is tell you you are victims and oppressed. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 05:31 PM
–

Lot of the advice for men boils down to "Don't be yourself", "Become a provider/rich" (work yourself to death) and "Focus on your outside appearance". And to be frank, they may work for seducing women, but at what cost? You become more shallow person, you become dishonest. Eventually, you will become resentful and feel deep sense of loneliness because deep down, you crave to be loved an accepted as yourself, but the women you get only love the performance or what you provide for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 10:18 PM
1

No, not really. I can survive and take care of myself. But it would be preferable to not be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:49 AM
1

Point A) I'm not going to watch that. There are shitty people in every group and community. There are mentally ill people in the manosphere, just as there are mentally ill feminists. Point B) Then you have a very selective hearing because the truth would be too painful for you. Point C) I assume you are talking about the "Unless men are nice for the sake of being nice, you are being fake". What kind of Jesus Christ "turn the other cheek" crap is that? If you are holding men to the standard of be…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:10 AM
4

I'm going to agree and even say that you actually need to become a worse person to become more successfull with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 11:54 PM
1

You are objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 11:52 PM
1

Pretty much. Let's say that men formed a chess club or a board game club only for men. They would be called misogynistic or incels immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:53 PM
1

But that’s kind of why I’m saying men need their own circles. Like the manosphere then? "No, not like that"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:11 PM
1

Disagreed. Many men joining the manosphere are simply normal men. Many have had horrible traumatic experiences with women, such as being cheated on, losing custody for their children in divorce, losing tons of money in divorce, or have been falsely accused of rape, or something horrifying. Many of them were people who genuinely believed in true love, chivalry, that women are the fairer gender, that women are caring, kind, nice and loyal. Many of them are those who genuinely tried to be there for…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:01 PM
1

That's so incredibly unrealistic to believe that people would stop doing something that actively rewards them. Humans are not fucking Jesus Christs. You know that's stupid. You live in a fairy tale. Despite how much you whine and complain, women obviously like it. You like fuck boys and bad boys pumping and dumping you. If you honestly wouldn't like it, you would't reward that behaviour. Period. Women love that shit. This is entirely and completely women's fault. Deal with it. Oh and btw when me…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:37 AM
0

As per usual, women blame men for the culture and problems they have created. Thinking they have no agency in the world. I mean, if I give money to someone for beating me up I am not going to fucking expect it to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:28 AM
0

Well, I don't blame the men. I blame women for rewarding them and not taking accountability for the hookup culture they are responsible for. This problem was created by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 12:09 AM
2

Some of it is about sex, but it's not all about sex. Yes, men want to have sex. Everyone does. But also, women seem to always think that all that men ever want is to get in their pants and that love and wanting sex are somehow mutually exclusive. Even if the man is nice, kind, considerate, you think it's only to get in your pants. And the men who "pump and dump", use manipulative strategies and are douchebags towards women do that because you reward them for that. You can't blame men for doing s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:45 PM
3

“Its only a coincidence we only value it from people we fuck!” Uh, what? You consider it weird that people want to have sex with the person they love? I mean, no shit. Sex is very intimate experience you want to have with a person you have a deep connection with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:32 PM
4

Women always think everything is about sex for men, when it's more about men wanting love and feeling appreciated. Reducing men's issues into "Aww you want your penis touched" is honestly yet again a way for women to diminish and ridicule men's experiences. Diminishing and invalidating people's needs and experiences is a common strategy that abusers use, btw. You can't say you care about men's issues and then on the other hand tell us you prefer a bear, and men are pigs, and so on. Feminism is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:49 PM
2

Women also tell men that men shouldn't care about their high body count, even though it is pretty unattractive for most men who are looking for a life partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:11 PM
1

The pill ideology is there to teach men what women really are like instead of listening to women or romantic movies telling us what they are like. And they have infinite amount of proof for their theories in statistics and social media posts where women out themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 10:05 PM
1

Oh my God. Have you heard about books? You know, you can learn about things without first hand experiencing them yourself. I literally said few posts above what I want. At this point I know you know you are absolutely wrong and stupid but your ego prevents you from backing off and admitting defeat, so I'm just going to leave it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 09:59 PM
6

Press X to doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 09:10 PM
1

You've had all your life to learn about men, and you have learned nothing. Your ignorance is your problem, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:58 PM
1

If you don't even know what men want you cannot talk about equality. How could you? To understand equality, the prerequisite is to understand the experience of both genders. You SHOULD know what men want. Yet here we are, you are admitting that you have no idea about the other side at all, yet you think you know what "rights" you should have. It's never been about equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:36 PM
1

And you never answered my question... You answered to my question with a quesion. So tell me exactly, what do men get from feminists, other than misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:12 PM
2

I'm sure you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 11:28 PM
3

But it's just not worth it for many men. It takes tremendous amount of work and mental energy, and the most probable outcome is you get rejected, humiliated and emotional pain. Not to mention no matter how liberal the woman is, they still expect you to make the first moves, have every part of your life together, and so on. Only for some other dude to get the same thing with 1% of the effort because of his height and jawline. No thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:31 PM
1

It's a reasonable argument. 50% of the population is men who happen to have the right to vote, it would be considerably difficult for feminism to exist if they lost the support of majority of men. So expecting men keep supporting feminism while not offering them anything (actually offering them worse than nothing aka misandry) doesn't seem realistic. But also taking into account that men are physically 10x stronger than women and are filled with testosterone, so, yeah, in the absolutely worst ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:17 PM
1

100% my man.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:42 PM
0

Humans are social animals. Despite what people say money doesn't make you happy. And before you suggest that men should socialize with each other, we have tried to form male only communities but they are either banned or forced to shut down by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:41 PM
1

C'mon, you can't possibly suggest that society doesn't pander to women. Honestly, I am baffled by this kind of dishonesty, or lack of self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:40 PM
1

Neither side is good. But I am wondering what does the feminism have to offer for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:37 PM
1

When I have ever said that I am attacking women, lmao?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 05:00 PM
5

And vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:54 PM
1

Then neither men have to comply for anything that benefits only women but not men. You can't have the cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:50 PM
2

You can't expect men to take the "positive masculinity" seriously when on the other hand, feminists are saying they prefer bears over men. It is clear that most feminist are misandrists and they do not care about men's issues at all. Like every group, they want power and control.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:37 PM
-1

Actually, I can. Take your deeply rooted hatred towards men somewhere else. You are a clear example of what I said in the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:35 PM
2

Never.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:33 PM
3

Again, you keep diminishing, belittling every issue men face, and thinking you are making a good point. You are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:31 PM
2

Other examples of what men don't get from society: Empathy: We are endlessly told by the media and feminists how terrible men are. Never anything positive. Appreciation: Men are only valued through what they provide, or when they sacrifice themselves, they are not inherently valued. Our concerns are not ever listened or taken seriously, which is a reason why men turn to manosphere, which is the only place where they are listened. You are a perfect example of this. Our problems never matter to yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:17 PM
2

Men do have leverage, too, which is their contribution to the society. They do not need to contribute if they don't get anything out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:04 PM
-1

Did you even read the text? My point is that women tell men constantly that they need to do X/Y/Z to cater for them. Yet women do not do the same for men, ever. That is a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:03 PM
0

Say what you say, marriage and other social contracts were the reason that societies did not collapse. The so called progress is basically anarchy where no one "owes" anyone anything and is free to do anything and everyone only think of themselves is not sustainable. To prevent society from collapsing, majority of people need to get something out of it, not just the top 20%. It's the same as a society with no taxes, it causes incredible wealth inequality which will eventually causes a crash when…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:01 PM
1

Say what you say, marriage and other social contracts were the reason that societies did not collapse. The so called progress is basically anarchy where no one "owes" anyone anything and is free to do anything and everyone only think of themselves is not sustainable. To prevent society from collapsing, majority of people need to get something out of it, not just the top 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 04:00 PM
0

It doesn't matter whether you think it is "justice" or "oppression" or not. Humans live life because of they want to enjoy life. If you expect that men will silently accept their fate on not getting anything from the society while everyone shits on them and still expects them to "provide" or sactifice themselves in a war, you are wrong. That's not how societies have ever worked. That's how revolutions happen. That's how poor eat the rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:51 PM
4

Women don’t want to lower their standards because why should they? Therefore proving my point. Imagine if men said that "why should we end patriarchy when it benefits us"? Why should men do anything for women if women don't do anything for them? Let me explain why you should listen to men's concerns. You don't want to have a society where huge amount of men are resentful, have no direction or purpose in a society. It will never lead to anything good. The manosphere is part of the reason why peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:43 PM
4

Men are the ones asking what they're supposed to do. Um, what? It has always been feminists shaming men about everything, for example the "manspreading".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:41 PM
4

Real confidence is being yourself and not caring what the outside thinks about you. Real confidence is actually showing vulnerability. However, this is not the kind of confidence women appreciate. They want the "hide your feelings but always be my emotional support and are willing to sacrifice your life for the greater good and provide for your family and don't complain about anything" kind of fake confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:40 PM
2

No. I literally said that was not my point. Are you illiterate? My point was that there is a blatant double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:36 PM
1

I guess I just lost the attraction to continue this conversation. Sorry :D
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:43 PM
1

You've been arguing from bad faith from the beginning, look at the pot calling the kettle black. I am not going to respond to your ramblings no more either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:40 PM
1

Yeah yeah I get it, "appeal to nature" is pretty much the only argument women give here. You cannot behave differently or do anything differently. Something like gender is a social construct, but woman's dating behaviour is beyond your control. It's not, you are just spoiled little brats. It's not "gaslighting" and saying that criticizing women is gaslighting, is in itself gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 10:34 PM
1

Lmao nothx. I have social skills. My match isn't someone awkward and nervous around women. My match is someone just as funny and confident as I am. The shy bumbling men can have the shy awkward women. Okay, so you say you are confident. But let me ask: Are you really confident in every situation? You never do something embarrassing by accident? Do you approach stangers confidently (wihtout alcohol)? And so on. My point was that people do have social skills and confidence but they may still fumbl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 09:58 PM
1

If that's your type then go for it. However, like I said, I really doubt you can tell person's confidence or "cockiness" based on few dates. No man is confident or cocky all the time - that's simply an act that men do that some women buy as the truth. And no one is cocky and good at everything. For instance, a man can be extremely confident and good in his career and hobbies but not in some other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 09:48 PM
6

I mean, it would be nice to have those male only clubs and spaces for friendships but feminists have forbidden their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 07:03 PM
6

You don't think it as a privilege the same way a rich westerner doesn't think a clean, fresh water supply as a privilege. It's just normal to them. People rarely understand their privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:48 PM
1

This is because men are willing to give women more chances in general, even if things don't seem perfect. A woman is maybe okay with one or two dates before making judgement but man would be willing to go for 10 dates to see how things are developing. Which often means sex. And besides, it makes sense to experience sex with a person before deciding to be serious with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:42 PM
2

I don't understand what is the point of this, OP? Like, so what this sub doesn't completely represent the bell curve? Does that mean that those men's experiences are less valid? Like, no shit, there is no a single community that represents the whole humanity. People who have had fortune have no reason to complain. Was your point just to humble brag about yourself and shit on people who have had misfortune? Very original of you. Posts like this prove that the empathy gap is real.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 02:59 PM
0

Good for you but honestly, that kind of relationship seems extremely rare to find. Usually someone has to settle or be alone forever. I am personally choosing to be alone forever over settling ever again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 07:51 PM
8

Why is it so hard to accept how privileged women are in this regard instead of coming up with this bs arguments like "it's not as good as you think it is". It's like saying to an African kid that it's not that special to have a balanced nutritious meal every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 07:46 PM
4

Just the porn one alone filters out probably like 90% of humanity lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 09:22 PM
1

As a man in my early 30s, I don't want to date some 20-25 year old women who lacks life experience and is probably flaky and has no idea what they want in their lives. And who have also ruined their brains with some TikTok/instagram brain rot. It's not just about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 08:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter