| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | German circumcision ban: Is it a parent's right to choose? (x-post r/XYChromosomes)What's your main argument in favor of them staying uncircumcised, rather than improved sexual stimulus and some vacuous self-determinism ideal? I actually don't have an enormous opposition to voluntary circumcision in Africa as long as the people undergoing the procedure are given all the facts (for and against, and reasonable criticism of the process behind the drive to promote circumcision). It's your desire to push this onto infants that I oppose, and it's insulting to refer to surgery on a c… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 09:19 PM |
| 3 | German circumcision ban: Is it a parent's right to choose? (x-post r/XYChromosomes)They act according to superstition and custom; these are people who believe that having sex with a virgin will cure you of AIDS. Then why have you not mentioned some of the very concerning reports that they think getting circumcised means they don't have to practice safe sex? Letting them decide whether or not they want to be circumcised would be a disaster because they would not act rationally or listen to "foreign" science. That's why so many are lining up to have it done, right? And why campa… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 08:24 PM |
| 6 | German circumcision ban: Is it a parent's right to choose? (x-post r/XYChromosomes)Criticism of those studies | /r/MensRights | 09/08/12 07:42 PM |
| 7 | Why tomorrow is a BIG day for the MRMYes, men do face issues when it comes to health and medical procedures, but not on the same level as women In other words "women have it worse". Followed by: Why do people so often feel the need to point out who "has it worse"? | /r/MensRights | 28/06/12 09:08 PM |
| 13 | The Idiocy In The Male Circumcision "Debate" | Lez Get RealThe link is here and here's a full copy of the text if for some reason it gets removed: Chris, Personally, I would love it if we could get rid of the male part of humanity. I am lesbian, you know. Here is the thing. . .FGM is not equivalent to removing your fucking foreskin. . .it is equivalent to removing your ugly, gods damned penis. Got that? Damaging the nerves in the clitoris makes orgasm incredibly difficult to nigh on impossible. Understood? Oh, some women can orgasm without their clitori… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/12 09:27 PM |
| 26 | The Idiocy In The Male Circumcision "Debate" | Lez Get RealTypical man hater I'd normally think this was hyperbole, but here's a quote from the author in the comments section from another of this site's articles: Personally, I would love it if we could get rid of the male part of humanity. I am lesbian, you know. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/12 08:44 PM |
| 1 | The leader of the opposition in SA says "women can't rape men" on twitterA quick search shows the literacy rate of South African women to be between 82% and 89%. Where are your statistics that say 83-90% or more of SA women have been raped? I have seen wildly varying numbers, but none anywhere near 90%, and have found no sources for the blogs/articles making the same claim you did. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/11 01:41 AM |
| 2 | Feminist here...But Hanna Rosin isn't in opposition to circumcision; she's one of the most zealous pro-infant circumcision people out there. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/11 10:52 PM |
| 2 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.Thank you for answering the question, albeit in a condescending manner. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 02:18 PM |
| 3 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.So where is the line when a blog (Jezebel) goes from "not generally notable" to "notable"? What specific number of page views per month? Can I add a notable media mention on Lindsay Lohan's page because their front-page headline is "Lindsay Lohan Shows Up Late To Community Service Again"? Or does it have to specifically mention Wikipedia? | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 01:48 AM |
| 4 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.So why is the Jezebel article linked? | /r/MensRights | 21/10/11 01:01 AM |
| 9 | Let's keep 'em honest. Wikipedia Men's Rights page has been unblocked for editing, and is being edited by some of the same actors that caused trouble. Make sure to follow wiki-procedure, and enforce it from others.I find it interesting that in the media mention section of the talk page, they link to a Jezebel article, but make no mention of any blogs taking the counter position. Not very neutral. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/11 07:06 PM |
| 3 | Separating out the elements on the latest internet dating/sex controversyThe article seemed to start off okay (though the Nice Guy stuff started to reek), but then rapidly deteriorated. I didn't manage to read past: Even men should be subject to social accountability Scrolled to the bottom, saw it authored by Amanda Marcotte. Did it have anything worth reading after this, or is it more of the same from Marcotte? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/11 03:04 PM |
| 4 | Atrocity: Surgeon went to prison after his accuser and her boyfriend lied on the standThis poster is a troll, not even the real Aerik (notice the dash after the name, and under 10 karma). | /r/MensRights | 30/08/11 06:48 PM |
| 3 | If men who get women pregnant without their consent are reproductive abusers, surely women who get pregnant without the explicit consent of the men should be called the same?A way that men seem to take all too often, tragically. Just look at the gender disparity in suicide. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/11 12:45 AM |
| 1 | Hey MR, have you ever felt allied with somebody on some of these issues despite them being a feminist?Just to clarify, you're using a 20 year old study in a county with 133,000 people (I searched and can't even find the study to read it, but it was done by The Committee for Justice for Women which makes me cautious) and applying it it to a country of over 300 million? | /r/MensRights | 19/08/11 04:08 PM |
| 1 | Hey MR, have you ever felt allied with somebody on some of these issues despite them being a feminist?As I am not a member of NOW, nor a resident of the states that I know of where they oppose default joint custody, I am not in a position to ask them directly. I only see what they post online: Michigan NOW Statement (pdf warning) What reasoning would be acceptable to you to "oppose a presumption of joint custody" any time custody is disputed? Keep in mind, any time custody is disputed, the woman gains primary custody in the vast majority of cases. This statement also makes no mention of proven* … | /r/MensRights | 18/08/11 11:03 PM |
| 8 | Hey MR, have you ever felt allied with somebody on some of these issues despite them being a feminist?Sure, it's easy to agree with plenty of issues feminists bring up, but there already exist plenty of established organizations and institutions that are already addressing or can be brought to address these issues. No such institutions and paltry few organizations exist to address issues MRAs bring up, thus why I believe "feminism" (really these organizations and institutions that push a feminist agenda) get attacked so often here. If a rag-tag group of fathers' rights activists lobby for defaul… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/11 09:33 PM |
| -2 | Alabama cops lure deadbeats into custody with football ticketsNice switchover from involuntary servitude to slavery. They are not the same thing even if they have some things in common. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/11 09:37 PM |
| 3 | I'd like a review of my argument with a friend that didn't quite appreciate that women can be sexist.Don't know what you're looking for here. She pulled out the "I don't trust men because they were assholes way before I was born, so your gender is now and forever tainted" card. Anybody who wants to silence you with real or perceived injustices you had nothing to do with isn't worth the breath (or bytes) of a reply. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/11 03:14 AM |
| 4 | Guys, we are better than this. Why was AngryProle banned? She never posted here.She's never posted here, yet is a moderator of /r/againstmensrights? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/11 02:34 AM |
| 6 | "Father's Rights" Groups: Beware Their Real AgendaAn article from 1997? From what I understand this is still their position, but is their any updated info? PS. Nostalgia'd hard at: You can check out the supporters of this bill and become familiar with the groups' real agenda by logging on to the Internet using any search engine such as Yahoo to search for "fathers' rights," or connect to: http://www.speakeasy.org/fathersrights/ or http://web2.airmail.net/fathers4 to learn more about their activities. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/11 02:06 AM |
| 3 | It appears that TIL's that present facts that go against the moderator's opinions get blocked (feminism)Browses to TodayILearned... Searches for "study"... Hmm... | /r/MensRights | 14/07/11 01:43 AM |
| 1 | Elevator guy incident and aftermath is indicative of a larger problem: The dismissal of seeking equality and the importance of empowering female privileges.I tend to agree, and I'm thinking the level of stupidity in this matter is directly related to how many words the actors are contributing to it, in which case Richard Dawkins is by far the least stupid of an impressive group of morons. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/11 03:58 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter