TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lendari Archive

View 4 posts and 182 comments by Lendari on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The data is not the problem. Nor is the collection methodology. The problem is the contrived definition of consent used to analyze the data and confirm a bias that rape is an accepted social norm among most men. That conclusion is not supported by the data or by common sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:21 PM
1

The analysis used a contrived definition of consent based on the premise that "convincing" a woman to consent is rape. Using a simpler and more commonly accepted definition of consent where no means no (and yes means yes) yields an entirely different conclusion from the same data. It is the definition of pseudoscience and confirmation bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:03 PM
1

You think its okay to say 40% of men are rapists? Not only is it factually wrong. Its in the same category of hate speech as claiming that 40% of women are untrustworthy or 40% of Mexicans are drug dealers. Its not data or science. It's an opinion that only a person with a deeply internalized bias would accept as a reasonable premise for further discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 10:26 PM
52

Wait. You mean we can't actively undermine an entire voting demographic with our policy positions and then expect them to vote for us because of vague partisan identities anyways? Would it help if we called them sexist, racist, xenophobic, emotionally handicapped incels too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 01:42 AM
13

The paper is pseudoscience and can be debunked just by reading it and asking critical questions about the content. For example the author suggests that "convincing" a woman to have sex or seeking women who are easier to convince is somehow exploitive male behavior. It raises the question what's the correct alternative behavior? Preferring to only have sex with women who are hard to get? Not attempting to convince women before having sex with them? Not having sex with women at all? The author red…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 01:14 PM
5

Ask about the hours worked gap? Men work more hours.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:57 AM
82

Get the facts right. When a woman wants something from a man its a "power dynamic". When a man want something from a woman it's "exploitive" and "creepy". See once you understand the sexist double standard it all makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 05:36 PM
0

As you get older, developing a predisposition to serve others is important. This is the difference between a child and an adult. There is nothing wrong with holding the door - don't make it a gendered thing - just do it for everone whenever possible. It's a good habit to have. If you feel taken advantage of or verbally abused, that is a problem. You need to consistently assert a boundary when this happens. Say "I'm not your servant, but you're welcome". Say "If we can't share the responsibility …
/r/MensRights10/04/26 11:18 AM
2

Yes. These are the people I am referring to. Cleopatra obtained power by murdering her brother. She maintained her power through a web of complex intimate relationships with powerful men. Her reign over Egypt was ended when the Romans got tired of her bullshit and conquered Egypt. If you're the head of state of an 8000 year old empire when it's subjugated by your own ex-lovers, you've gotta own that legacy. She is the canonical example of a great ancient empire ending under the direct influence …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 02:01 AM
9

Right. It is deplorable to sit around and talk about women's bodily autonomy and ignore the millions of men forced into conscripted millitary service and murdered by the state. The election of Trump over Hillary and Kamala was in part a public backlash against radical feminism. The selective hearing of this movement that picks and chooses facts is the opposite of data driven leadership. It should not come as a surprise that this rhetoric fails to earn trust when presented to an unbiased and genu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:45 PM
3

The difference is that women always have other options. Men work or are homeless. Women work or live with a man who works or get government assistance. Women have a completely different safety net than men. I think this explains actually the reason women are more likely to support politicians who create social welfare programs. Its not that women are more altruistic or care about the poor. It's that those programs are more likely to directly benefit women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 02:47 PM
28

Heres a hint. Good Jobs Workers Right's Labor Unions When the left abandoned those core principles they abandoned men. Its not clear what they got in return either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 02:46 PM
5

Lesbians have the highest divorce rates. You can sleep soundly at night knowing that the only thing the average woman hates more than men is other women.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 07:05 AM
1

This is the sub that bans people who've never posted there for posting here..
/r/MensRights28/04/25 06:16 AM
4

The current state of education is a test to see if gender equality goes both ways or if modern feminism and DEI programs are just sexist movement seeking female superiority at the expense of other demographics. A lot of watchdog organizations seem more interested in creating victim blaming narriatives than acting in the interests of gender equality and protecting boys from bias in organizations where 80 to 100% of the faculty is female. The fact that it took an authoritarian, anti-DEI administra…
/r/MensRights15/03/25 11:14 AM
14

I mean its viewpoints like this that result in the growing popular support for backlash they're complaining about. Extremism begets more extremism. They've become what they hate.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:40 PM
12

Men rapists rape homeless women because there will be no consequence, no one will listen to them. If I slightly change what you said... Male homeless individuals are frequently murdered because there will be no consequence. It would be absurd for me to conclude that based on this fact alone, that Western societies hold a widespread cultural belief that killing homeless men is acceptable. Again, the problem is that you believe men are expendible and women are precious. Which is a sexist point of …
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:50 AM
32

Never one single time during any phase in my life has another man ever come up to me and said: "hey you know its ok to rape people right?". Likewise I have never been in a locale where rape wasn't a capitol offense. This includes parties thrown by multi-millionaires, university campuses, poor red neck towns and third world countries. If there are actually people in the world who believe that rape is okay, they are uniquely sociopathic individuals who are not part of any systemic set of Western c…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:05 PM
12

Tell them you are uncomfortable working with with this team. Then provide only the most minimal details that are asked for.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:51 PM
2

Capitalism is a zero sum game old friend. These aren't my words. They are the words of Milton Friedman. To say this is fallacy is ignorance that isn't worth debating.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 04:03 PM
7

Youre not paid for your degree or how hard your job is or how much shit you put up with. You're paid based on the supply of other people who can do the work instead of you. Economics is, in actual fact, a zero sum game. As women entered the workforce a lot of historically high wage fields became oversaturated. We got more workers and more dual earner households. What we didnt get was more wages. We just had more people fighting for the same dollars and a capatalist model that was prepared to exp…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:25 AM
5

They are only offering a plea deal because they aren't 100% certain they will win. If I was innocent of the charge, I would recruit the most competent and experienced private law firm in my local city to (1) overwhelm them with efforts that maximize the time and expense of the trial and (2) file a counterclaim for a false accusation. Don't sell yourself short. Commit to winning. Go big. You have nothing to lose.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 07:58 PM
21

Exactly the type of dishonesty and implicit bias that is leading to a pushback on feminism in general. The average person is starting to smell bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 03:27 PM
3

With the Trump administrations stance on DEI you can bet these types of government programs will be subject to more scrutiny in the future.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 10:01 AM
22

They're probably referring to the fact that women were historically excluded from early stage clinical drug research trials. You know. Because they might have a baby and screw up the study and/or the baby. From the researchers point of view excluding women was controling for a confounding variable. Yes this had some unintended consequences but calling it misogyny isn't exactly the whole truth. It's also a historical issue. Modern clinical research studies are conducted on men and women and event…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 06:25 AM
22

This is so stupid. Russian culture is very traditional in terms of gender roles. Leave it to feminists to pick the facts they like and ignore everything else. "Feminists want the power of men, the privilege of women and the responsibility of children."
/r/MensRights06/12/24 06:53 PM
5

There is so many details beyond the age and genders of the children that is not included in this article. I can't tell if this was deserved or not. It sounds like manslaughter (as opposed to premeditated murder) at worst. Why aren't the parents or gun owners being held reaponsible too? If you can stand trial as an adult at 15 then you should be able to vote, sign contracts, drop out of school and drink yourself stupid too. The double standards we have about the rights and responsibilities of chi…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/24 03:18 PM
2

How is this not already illegal? Kinda sounds like fake news to me.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 03:25 PM
70

Im just going to say this. There are women who are not pro-choice. There are women who did not vote for Hillary and Kamala. There are women who make a living by profiteering from other women. There are women who murder, women who rape and women who molest children. These are all simple undeniable facts. There are also men who are die hard feminists. If all the men were gone, the problems would not go away. The hypothesis that these are issues arising from a single gender is fundamentally flawed.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 04:24 PM
1

I actually kinda thought this. Most real life therapists are pretty empathetic. Perhaps even when they should not be. I'm not sure that the femcel mentality you see on Reddit feminist subs would be successful in that industry. The exception might be people who are really young and inexperienced or something.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 03:34 PM
14

I think the issue is generalizing from this position to one that villifies all/most men as eager to rape all/most women when given any opportunity or the idea that there is a culture among all/most men that would tolerate this kind of behavior. Then trying to posit this paranoia to others as an undeniable fact based position. To directly answer the OPs question about how to respond to this pseudoscience... women are more likely to be in a car accident than raped but that doesn't stop them from g…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 03:01 PM
0

One of those people who... thinks critically about the facts and states a reasonable conclusion? Guilty AF.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 03:28 PM
1

A huge number of women who support MRA are doing it for money (views, likes and subscribes) or to virtue signal how wonderful they are (self-promotion) or just to feed their ego (attention whore). The only other explanation is that they genuinely care about men's welfare. This is so unlikely people just reject it. Hence the observation of the OP.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:02 PM
7

We've acknowledge that segregation was just racism by another name. One of the primary justifications for segregation in the US was that it made some people feel safer. It's incomprehensible to me that a woman can be in a completely safe situation, randomly decide that she feels unsafe and then expect everyone to adjust to accommodate her feelings. That is like the very definition of privilege to even think like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/24 02:58 PM
3

Here are the facts. Lifetime healthcare cost for a female are about 10% higher on average than for a male. The gap between the life expectancy of a male and female in the US has widened from 4.8 years in 2010 to 5.7 years in 2019. Issues like not being taken seriously by providers, lack of access to mental health care or being inconsistently prescribed narcotic pain treatment are gender neutral failures of western medicine and not exclusively "women's issues". The logic feminists use to suggest …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:01 AM
3

Sounds like victim blaming?
/r/MensRights15/09/24 03:32 AM
3

The difference is that arguing with actual facts is more pursuasive. The fact is that in the US all men are compelled by law to sign documents that could result in involuntarily forced servitude for the US government or face criminal charges. The fact is that forced conscription of any person of any gender under any legal system is a human rights abuse. The fact is that men are disproportionately affected by forced conscription laws. That's it. That's the whole issue. Spouting off false claims a…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:27 AM
0

You do realize that wasn't the original claim right?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 09:23 PM
-1

I feel like this is the longest way ever to say "yeah you're right failure to register for selective service doesn't automatically prevent you from voting"? Selective service and other forms of forced conscription are human rights abuses. Just focus on that point. Saying it prevents you from voting in the US is factually wrong, makes you look ignorant and undermines the point that forced conscription is a human rights abuse that disproportionately affects men worldwide.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 03:34 PM
7

Yes a lot of discussions of "rights" are complicated because they affect other people. Like if you have the blanket right to education, medical care or housing does that imply that teachers, doctors and homebuilders are violating your rights if they refuse to serve you for free? What rights does everyone else have? Your rights are about what you can do. Not what other people will be obligated to do for you. Thats just entitled and privileged thinking. It's always surprising to me how upset and a…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 01:49 PM
-26

This isn't quite right. You're asked to register for selective service when you register to vote leading some people to believe this. Not registering for selective service is a federal crime but it doesn't actually preclude voting. You will do jail time if you're found guilty of draft evasion in court. Theres a lot of bullshit here. Its just not the bullshit you were lead to believe. EDIT: Holy shit 30 downvotes for stating a 100% true fact. This is one of those subs huh?
/r/MensRights14/09/24 01:44 PM
2

Men and women are different and need different things to be happy. Not every difference is automatically a sexist conspiracy against women perpetrated by men. Many of these products are created and marketed by women to women. The women who do this are often regarded as innovators and champions of feminisim. No one forced anyone to do anything. Women made these choices of their own free will. If you can't fix it, it might not be a problem.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:18 PM
3

That AI generated response about rape statistics is wildly out of alignment with the NSVRC data set. http://nsvrc.org/statistics It's always cute when people Google something and take the first result that confirms their inherent bias as proof of correctness. Remember that AIs are programmed to echo the most popular opinion without much consideration for correctness or facts.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 11:10 AM
6

Feminism seeks [to] ensure all individuals, regardless of gender, have equal opportunities Affirmative action policies at the most feminist academic institutions limit access to opportunity by looking at the equality of outcomes and imposing their own belief systems on what is right and just. This is the opposite of what you're suggesting. The educational system in the US is almost entirely run by women. Boys are punished in elementary schools 4x as much as girls. They get worse grades for the s…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:58 PM
10

In order to correct historical wrongdoing, academic institutions were given a licence to integrate discriminatory practices into their selection processes. Instead of using that license to right certain historical wrongs and create equality of opportunity for girls they used it to undermine the educational outcomes of boys. It's proof that matriarchal institutions have their own biases and blind spots and are no more trustworthy than patriarchal ones. No matter how many degrees you give to women…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 02:27 PM
22

How is that even possible? Are the cops going door to door selling girl scout cookies? No. It was paid by insurance and the tax payers pay the insurance premiums which will undoubtedly increase because this PD is a disastrous liability.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:48 PM
39

I've noticed there's a certain brand of feminist who is taught to believe that the path to success in life is by controlling others through sex or trading sex for favors. They consider this to be empowering and reject the more traditional thinking that this behavior limits their potential over the longer term. The idea of male stoicism and especially celibacy is threatening to this small but vocal group of women as it undermines their identity and philosophy about how the world works. Hence thei…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:42 PM
3

Use the socratic method. The way to "win" any argument starts by thoroughly understanding their view point. Then you ask them questions that lead them to respond in ways that represent your point of view. Example: Person 1: "the supreme courts reversal of Roe is patriarchy" Person 2: "did you know there are women who aren't pro choice and support the new precedent?" Person1: "yes... but they are ignorant" Person 2: "how many abortions can someone have?" Person 1: "any number, it's a womans right…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 10:51 PM
4

Men didn't invent everything. They only invented almost everything. Anyone who thinks otherwise is willfully ignorant. Which is worse than stupid. Its like a self inflicted disease.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 06:03 AM
2

Take a multivitamin, get some exercise and if it doesn't get better see a doctor. Especially if youre taking other medicine. It might be a known side effect.
/r/seduction21/02/24 12:48 AM
5

I mean if you wanna rent a BMW to take her out go for it.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:06 AM
3

This is still way, way lower than the national divorce rate for "healthy" people? So what gives?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:45 AM
4

So 80% of men are likely to stay with a terminally sick partner? I feel like that's less sensational than 20% of men likely to leave terminally sick partner. The headline itself isnt taking a neutral point of view. Did this study control for how long people were together, if they were legally married, etc. Since 20% is way lower than the typical divorce rate it might suggest that sickness actually is a factor in keeping people together. It feels like more feminist pseudoscience to me trying to v…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 04:07 PM
1

You're dating someone 7 years older who wants a sugar daddy? Have some respect for yourself.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 11:11 AM
11

The system rewards both genders differently. This is exactly right. In traditional gender roles, men had power, women had privilege and both sexes had responsibilities to civilization. What feminists appear to want is to grab for power while simultaneously eroding their responsibilities and retaining their privileges.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/23 08:40 PM
6

Women only want one thing and it's disgusting!
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:01 PM
5

Because calling people names is easier than listening, thinking critically and forming your own reasonable opinions?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 11:22 PM
9

In general higher education, particularly in the US and UK is abandoning academic rigour in favor of profit seeking. It bothers me how many young "scientists" I see who just have no critical thinking capacity and seem to be personally offended by facts and data that challenge their belief system. It's sad really because it is hurting science as a whole to have so many unqualified scientists publishing pseudo-research.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:04 PM
5

Uhhh, HR stepped in because there was a wrongful termination lawsuit. Probably the manager didn't go through the process (IE: documented performance issues and failed remediation) to fire you.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:58 PM
45

That is a really nice article. I appreciate that they used facts rather than anecdotes to support the claim. The whole thing about COVID affecting men more was the opposite of what was being reported during the pandemic. There were articles stating women were the most affected which in retrospect looking at the facts is just erroneous. It's the same about the war in Ukraine. Somehow men being forcibly conscripted by their respective governments and ordered to fight and die in a war that doesnt h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 12:32 AM
94

These women need to be shamed publicly. Turnabout is fair play. No one should ever believe them again.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:49 PM
2

Because the wage gap is pseudoscience crafted by creating broad, vague groups (like all men vs all women) that dont control for any variables (like education, profession, years of consecutive experience, hours worked per week or fundamental desire to work at all) and selecting one fact (gross lifetime earnings) and ignoring other facts (like lifetime total hours worked) and then creating bullshit reasons based on a theory of patriarchy rather than scientifically working through the variables for…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 03:26 AM
-9

You're saying the police texted you? Smells like bullshit. There's no upside for the police to ever text a person of interest with an allegation. All it would do is tip them off to run away or lawyer up or be obstructive in some other way. Ergo it did not happen. Also half the things you listed aren't even actual crimes.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:38 AM
6

This was posted in /r/news. I basically made a completely rule abiding, on-topic and civil comment to the effect that it's an example of the systemic sexism of the justice system. Comment was stealth deleted with no explanation. Probably should feel lucky I didn't get banned. Getting sick of Reddit anyways.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:15 PM
6

They will just put her on parole as a "non-violent" offender in 6 months regardless of the sentence.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/23 07:38 PM
5

There will always be haters. You can't judge a community by the worst individuals. It's important to look at the bigger picture. Of all the gender advocacy subs on Reddit MRA is by far the most neutral and willing to discuss concerns. The women's groups like twox or fds have outright banned any form of constructive conversation that questions their extreme points of view. They are echo chambers. This is not. We tolerate listening to the perspectives of third-wave feminists and MGTOW advocates an…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 06:16 PM
5

It kinda sounds like victim blaming when you call the life expectancy gap a lifestyle choice. It's a societal problem as much as an individual problem. There's a social norm that male life is more disposable or less valuable than other human life. This manifests as a thousand paper cuts that explain the life expectancy gap. It's some combination of higher suicide rates, more forced conscription, working in more dangerous occupations and taking more risks. The male disposability theory also leads…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 09:28 AM
10

I mean wasn't there a court ruling on the female FIFA team alleging discrimination because male FIFA players earned more. Then when all the facts were laid out in court it turned out the females were all salaried full-time employees with luxurious healthcare benefits and the males were independent contractors on short duration contracts with few benefits and far more contractual out-of-game media appearance obligations? IIRC the judge ruled against the discrimination because the entire business …
/r/MensRights16/12/22 08:46 PM
1

What is a past example where the government colluded with a private organization to oppress individual speech?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:01 PM
1

Correct the bill of rights protects you from oppression by the government. Not oppression by private institutions.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:55 AM
22

It's because Americans have a bill of rights that protects speech lol.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:55 PM
5

You have to approve of the balls on the mortuary examiner calling it a "homicide" though. There must have been so much pressure from the police to call it an accident.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 02:12 AM
14

The CDCs national survey on intimate partner violence says women are aggressors and men are victims far more than assumed and far less likely to be taken seriously and reported in statics. Sexual violence isn't a gynocentric or single gender issue.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 02:36 AM
21

Very confusing message indeed. Does this imply that the UN views the murder of male journalists as an insignificant problem? How do you substantiate the claim that women are being "targeted" when they make up the minority of victims of this specific problem? When did free speech and freedom of the press become a gender specific issue?
/r/MensRights03/11/22 04:21 PM
15

The school faculty acting like I'm a kidnapper or pedophile every time I pick my daughter up from school.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 02:36 PM
4

Apparently PETA is against balanced diets and having sex. Maybe they should team up with the Catholic church or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/22 03:10 PM
2

I usually characterize it as equality, human rights or social justice. Some people will say this is already what feminism stands for, but this is pretty easy to disprove by quoting modern feminists talking about the usual things. For example, belittling male victims of sexual assault, body shaming men, blaming men for their own mental health issues or advocating for female privileges that deny males equal opportunities. Also the "kill all men" haters often claim to be feminists.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:49 AM
-1

Selective service is an example of a of a federal law that discriminates against men. Nothing more and nothing less. This relationship between voting rights and selective service registration is often misunderstood due to the way politicians in the 1960s used selective service to justify the 26th ammendment. Selective service registration does not actually or legally confer voting privileges nor does failure to register to vote or actually vote exclude most males from their obligation to registe…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:30 AM
2

I would be careful. The facts are like this. Women in the United States have enjoyed equal voting rights for over 100 years and equal employment and educational opportunity under the law for over 60. As a result millennial women and younger living in the Unites States have never directly faced broad systemic discrimination or "patriarchy". Millennial women living in the United States have disproportionately large opportunities relative to men due to affirmative action programs, social safety net…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:45 PM
7

This sounds like an experiment that deserves publication. Are you willing to share the data?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:43 PM
4

So I'm not going to say that there is enough total support for male victims or that there is not circles of gynocentrism that refuse to acknowledge male victims exist. Putting aside those extremist viewpoints, I am going to suggest that recognition for male victims has gained some momentum recently. It is probably at an all time high in the wake of me too. It might be because the the public did listen to women. When they turned a watchful eye, they observed the stories of Amber Heard and Cardi B…
/r/MensRights13/09/22 01:47 AM
1

Like any right, the right to pursue happiness is not unlimited in scope. Actions having undesirable consequences doesn't automatically amount to infringing on an inalienable right. That said your argument has merit and my position is influenced by it.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:16 AM
1

The US Census reveals that men pay a larger share of both child support and child care expenses. Some might argue that the time a mother dedicates to her child is undervalued by this data, however the same argument would need to be applied to a father's time to be valid. The number of stay-at-home fathers is on the rise, while the amount of child support paid by men is not necessarily in decline. What is much more damning is the fact that men pay over 95% of alimony in the United States. Which d…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:48 AM
1

Are you ok with forcing men to be fathers and pay child support for 18 years? In general, I think that if you are the biological parent of a child then it is your responsibility to care for it. I have written about the injustices of the family court system against men on this sub several times before. I'm not sure those injustices amount to changing my opinion on this fundamental belief though.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:39 AM
1

So being obligated to bear someone a child is really midevil and ignores the mother's right to pursue her own happiness. This doesn't mean the sensible position is that every single mother is fundamentally entitled to abort any child at any time as often as desired as an inalienable human right. The right of the baby to life must be considered, as well as the rights of the father and the freedom of the medical professionals performing the operation to exercise their own case-by-case judgement an…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:25 PM
1

Try joining a group at https://www.meetup.com/ that aligns with your own interests. They have everything from hiking to board games to book clubs. Don't just go to meet people, find something that you'd go to anyway. Many groups are limited to like age ranges so meeting single people is really common and you already have a shared interest in common.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 04:37 AM
2

I mean extremists like this are great. I bookmark everything they say. You know why? Their body of work can be cited as factual evidence that the goal of modern, mainstream feminism has abandoned gender equality and human rights in favor of female supremacy and sexist hate.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:07 AM
17

Okay, so Feminists love to add up "all births and deaths across all ages and geographic locales" and make fucked up statistics based on a few historically outlying countries that don't practice Western values. Confounding statistics by rolling everything into two huge buckets (IE: all men vs. all women) is a common practice for people looking to confuse everyone (*). Putting that aside, to truly understand the science of what is termed as gender surplus, you have to look at the statistics sliced…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 03:06 AM
3

All surgeons can legally decline to perform non-emergent procedures based on the medical facts and their personal beliefs. Those facts and beliefs may be different for different procedures. It is an objective fact that the medical risks of female sterilization are much higher than male sterilization. It is quite literally comparing major surgery to an outpatient procedure. As such, surgeons may have different standards for performing the operations that aren't based solely on sexist beliefs. It'…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/22 01:55 PM
64

Men being forced to fight against their will isn't a human rights problem. The way that it makes women feel is the real problem. These narratives don't even make sense. It's pretty clear that the UN no longer cares about the objectivity of its facts.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:52 PM
3

Feminists want the power of men, the privilege of women and the responsibility of neither.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:34 AM
4

Write something to HR with clear and specific examples of where she has crossed the line. Especially anyting involving touching you, making overtly sexual gestures, spreading rumors about having sex with you, etc. Cases where others observed the behavior and are willing to corroborate your account are especially helpful. The HR department has a legal obligation to investigate and respond to this. They should at the very least document the claim, conduct an independent and unbiased investigation …
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:47 PM
62

"Men are truly malignant tumors that will just add work and trouble to your life." Reddit may not consider this hate speech, but if the genders were reversed they would and that's the most clear and objective definition of sexism that exists. The toxicity of this person's entire post history reveals what a truly special person they are inside. What's important to remember is that this person is a hateful bigot expressing an extreme viewpoint that is magnified by the broken Reddit censorship poli…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 02:04 PM
12

Careful you'll get banned from the women's subs just for posting here.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 01:25 AM
1

Feminism pushes the idea that in order to be equal to men, women should behave like men. It pushes women to prioritize education and careers over children and families. It dismisses the value that mothers and homemakers bring to society. It encourages women to have more casual sex while creating a cultural movement against "slut-shaming" to protect them from any feedback. I think we've all anecdotally observed that the more deeply a woman embraces this philosophy, the more unhappy they become wi…
/r/MensRights17/07/21 02:05 PM
17

I've always enjoyed the hypocrisy pushed by feminists that criticizes pornography as being degrading to women but simultaneously glorifies (female) sex workers as being strong and brave fighters against the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 07:49 PM
2

Uhm men aren't a "majority". Last I checked 50% of the planet was female.
/r/MensRights30/06/21 06:47 PM
3

The most disgusting part is that the first death was kinda brushed aside. Had she not had another child die, she might have gotten away with the first murder. After the second death, a criminal investigations started and her other two children (boy and girl) were removed from her custody for about 3 months. The murder of the third boy occurred when they were returned to her. So basically she committed murder while she was already the subject of a criminal child abuse investigation. It seems like…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 09:55 PM
4

If it's about equality why is it called feminism? Just call it equality. The idea that feminism was a crusade for equality was a principle of what is now known as second wave feminism. It may be what you learned in school but it is not what is taught in college classrooms in 2021. The current wave of thought is called third wave feminism. The core principle of third wave feminism is to fight the patriarchy and maximize the gain for women. These are words shared by modern, prominent, published fe…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 01:17 PM
6

It's harder to prove discrimination if the company doesnt have enough staff to show statistical bias. This doesnt make it legal to discriminate, just easier to get away with. Let's say the population of qualified applicants for a job is 50/50 male to female. If a company hires 2 females it's about 50% probable that would happen by pure random chance. However if they hire 8 females from that population (and 0 males) the probability it occurred by random chance alone is 1 in 256. Basically it's im…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 06:25 AM
10

Right. Throughout history, people identified as celibate to indicate spiritual connections and put themselves above human desires. It was a way to elevate oneself and demonstrate a form of anti-corruptibility when occupying a position of power. The fact that so many great scientists and philosophers were celibate or adopted celibacy is really evidence that it improves ones character rather than detracts from it. The FDS community fears male celibacy because it undermines a core principle of thei…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:59 PM
1

That was precedent on a different topic. Also there are female members of MRA.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 01:03 PM
2

Regardless, lifetime bans on a non-political sub like /r/offmychest without any evidence of breaking a rule is an abuse of power. Furthermore, accusing everyone on /r/mensrights of advocating an incel/redpill lifestyle is a false statement that indicates ignorance on the part of the moderator passing such judgments. I'd love to hear Reddit's stance on that type of behavior from moderators. If they believe that a mod can do whatever they want, then why do they require subs to have rules? If you w…
/r/MensRights19/04/21 02:23 PM
2

The sub in question is /r/offmychest. I never posted on /r/offmychest and they banned me for "participating in redpill/incel subs" which isn't even an accurate accusation. Can the MRA moderators bring this up with the Reddit admins? It has to be some form of harrassment or abuse to permenately ban people without any post being made on the moderated sub.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 08:28 AM
67

This is an underrated comment. Yes you could get a lawyer and in the US for sure you'd win, but I'm assuming the bonus was so small as to make sure there was no real incentive for anyone to fight it like this. You'd pay more for the lawyer than the bonus was worth. This approach is a great way to make a big statement for free. Make sure the email is professional, based on objective and factual arguments and not able to be traced back to you. In the email you can. Quote the labor discrimination l…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 01:53 PM
4

People keep saying murder, but was it prosecuted as murder? She didnt leave her home that day with premeditated intent to kill this man. You can argue that failing to call 911 and fleeing the scene becomes an intent to kill. The problem is that there's ways to explain those actions that don't amount to a criminal motive for murder. If this was tried as murder, as absurd as it sounds, she could have potentially walked away with a not guilty verdict. What probably happened is that they prosecuted …
/r/MensRights05/03/21 06:27 PM
1

Record them and file a title IX gender discrimination lawsuit againt the school for creating a hostile environment? You get a teacher on tape saying "men are pigs" or "kill all men" or other radically sexist stuff, they're going to have a hard time defending that in court. Especially in an English class that's majority female?
/r/MensRights11/02/21 10:24 PM
8

At this point feminism is based on feelings. I frequently find myself having this conversation. Feminist: Women are a protected minority. Me: Women aren't even a minority, they make up 51% of the population. Feminist: Well women are more vulnerable. Me: Women enjoy more rights under the law than men. For example, women can vote without registering for selective service. Furthermore, men are less likely to get a college degree and more likely to be homeless or commit suicide. The life expectancy …
/r/MensRights18/01/21 05:06 PM
36

Yeah, this is kinda crazy. Every single person on death row has a diagnosable mental disorder. Ever heard of oppositional defiant disorder? Most of them are racial minorities as well, it's not like this woman has lead an unusually difficult life by comparison. She admits to committing a grotesque crime that resulted in the death of a mother and her unborn baby. There's no excuse for that. Maybe she deserves to die. The reality is that death sentences for anyone are super rare. A few dozen per ye…
/r/MensRights12/01/21 01:18 PM
3

The path I take is to expose the hypocrisy in the idea that men telling women how to behave is toxic but women telling men how to behave is feminism. This is a double standard. More generally, if flipping the genders of a situation results in different judgments then the argument is likely to be premised on sexism. The term toxic masculinity is sexist is because it goes one way. There are plenty of examples of women behaving poorly. Pull a few examples out of your back pocket and ask them what t…
/r/MensRights22/12/20 05:38 AM
41

This is the video in question https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTHgMxQEoPI. It hits really hard on the idea that while men and women share the roles of procreating and providing, men disproportionately shoulder the burden of protection. This is backed up with a bunch of mostly objective facts demonstrating that people born with male chromosomes are on average physically stronger than those who are not. This does challenge some feminist fallacies. That men and women are the "same". This is the equ…
/r/MensRights21/12/20 07:33 PM
3

No one forced you to drink, or to get in the car or to get naked or into bed. If they did, that's rape. Otherwise, it's a regrettable series of decisions.
/r/MensRights06/11/20 02:47 AM
22

So it's possible to be accused of rape without having been forceful or having any specific physical contact at all? It sounds to me like this completely changes the definition of rape and as such devalues the term. Here's what I'll never understand. If you drink and drive then your at fault. Even if theres no negative consequences for anyone else. However, if you drink and fuck that's just fine. Unless you regret it in the morning. Then it's the other persons fault. What these laws are missing i…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 08:18 PM
2

A quick Google scholar search reveals Alan Smithers is a real person who has published a lot of research on education. I think this is legit, but dailymail.co.uk is just as likely to publish clickbait and fake news and as such is difficult to use as a source. Can someone link the peer-reviewed publication behind this article. I'd like to add it to my collection of MRA papers.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 04:05 PM
1

I'm pretty sure only abusive women say that.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:55 PM
13

Sex with someone who doesnt consent is rape. A minor can't consent so it is always rape. This is a prepubescent child in the 8th grade. Gender is completely irrelevant in this case. Its bordering on pedophilia.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 01:20 PM
24

I always worry that sarcastic comments like this will be taken out of context if someone reads my post history.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:57 AM
63

Ignoring the fact that codifying wage discrimination based on gender contradicts federal labor laws, it's obvious that whoever wrote this doesn't seem to have any real experience with economic policy. If this actually went into effect, it would probably benefit unemployed men willing to work for minimum wage the most. Effectively a men's job program. The reason is because if there was a higher minimum wage for women, employers would simply favor hiring the candidates who asked for a lower wage. …
/r/MensRights05/08/20 04:20 PM
2

Yup. When men are assaulted by women it's because they deserve it and should be able to take it. When women are assaulted by men it's toxic masculinity and a felony, even if the woman is not actually injured. It's exactly the sexist double standard modern feminists are fighting to preserve. They want the privilege of women, the power of men and the responsibility of children.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 04:12 PM
2

America's "war on drugs" is a terrible government-industrial complex that appears at it core to be driven by racism and perverse incentives. The net result is that over the last 30 or 40 years, America has imprisoned more individuals than every other nation on earth combined and created a business out of systematically imprisoning black and poor men. Despite this effort, America still faces major societal issues with mental health care, addiction and drug overdose suggesting that the entire effo…
/r/MensRights02/08/20 08:00 AM
229

This happens when a man's name is incorrectly listed as the father on a birth certificate and the biological father can't be identified. A paternity test might not be enough to sway the court away from ordering child support in this case. This is why you should always get a paternity test before allowing your name on a birth certificate. It is a fairly significant legal document. Courts may interpret your name on the birth certificate as an adoption and ignore subsequent paternity test results. …
/r/MensRights19/07/20 01:51 PM
51

Yeah they have a rule... "Opinions need to be unpopular and not just controversial." Which sounds smart until you realize that it's a completely arbitrary license to censor anything they don't want to see. I guess some opinions are too unpopular for /r/unpopularopinion try /r/unpopularfacts.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:59 AM
2

Really interesting story. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 10:51 AM
21

So how do you report a sub? It's clearly hateful.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 12:17 PM
1

It looks like it was taken down?
/r/MensRights10/07/20 12:41 AM
151

Privilege of a woman. Power of a man. Responsibility of a child. That is the picture of a modern feminist.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:01 PM
1

This is hilarious. Girls just wanna have fun. Boys should be gender shamed.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 10:53 AM
3

This is a wakeup call. When you see institutional rules that are discriminatory you you need to challenge them. A lot of universities in the US have policy that flagrantly violates title IX with policies that selectively favor women and even use title IX (which mandates gender equality) to justify their insanity. When these issues go to court they are more often than not struck down. It's really clear that toxic feminism starts on college campuses. The tools are out there to fight back. Were not…
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:50 AM
1

I guess this is what they teach in gender studies. Lessons in how to a victim no matter what.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 02:32 AM
3

Feminists getting angsty when they see real examples of oppression.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 11:11 PM
16

More likely to be disciplined or expelled from school. Less likely to recieve college scholarship. Less likely to be admitted to college. Less likely to graduate from college. Lower incomes below age 30 or so.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 04:17 PM
6

The fact that Twitters content policy even allows this kind of hate speech to be posted is the reason we are here.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 05:22 PM
-2

This is off topic for the sub and while it negligent it wasn't murder. I don't think its unusual for a grand jury to decide not to bother with a manslaughter charge.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 02:26 PM
23

This fallacy is that he is blaming the victim. Saying that a suicide victim is at fault for not seeking help is lke saying that a rape victim is at fault because they dressed provocatively. Men don't commit suicide because they can't express thair feelings. They commit suicide because they are trapped in a society that is indifferent to their feelings. This "joke" is an example of that indifference. He's literally using male victims of suicide as a punchline.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 06:58 PM
1

Please call the suicide prevention hotline at 1-800-273-8255. As far as your uncle, does he have a lawyer? What country is this? You might consider wearing a body camera in public. It's ridiculous yes, but protect yourself.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 02:51 PM
36

Because everyone says we are hateful towards women. It's an ignorant lie but an effective one because few people do the research to differentiate. We get thrown in the pile with other communities like incel and mgtow that do have a female negative bias. They've wanted to axe us for years. What will be interesting is to see if they also kill hate subs like femaledatingstrategy and pinkpillfeminism that have policies to ban people who make male-positive comments or point out how so called "women's…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:09 PM
16

Goodby friends. Keep on fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 02:05 PM
10

Allright guys. This is not an accurate headline. It IS being covered when other standards of care fail. A last resort so to speak. The evidence isn't in that it's more effective than established treatments. Please read the article. Theres a lot of details here.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 06:59 PM
3

No. Women behaving like men is squarely a tenant of third wave feminism. It comes from the fallacy that if men and women are equal then they are the same. If they are the same then they should want the same things and behave similarly. Especially when it comes to "empowering" activities like having sex. The net result is a generation of single, unsatisfied and confused 30-something year old girls blaming their problems on "the patriarchy" when it is actually the fallacy of feminism that screwed …
/r/MensRights26/06/20 06:34 PM
5

I mean sure they charge her. Wait until she gets some suspended 2 year sentence and is out on parole in a year. While a man would serve 10 years of hard time or more for the same exact crime.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:12 PM
1

I identify as woderful. Thanks.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 02:16 PM
110

Loreal doesn't care because their market demographic is exclusively female and the majority of them don't care.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 04:00 PM
4

Whenever people talk about the patriarchy, I ask them where it is. This will confuse them and eventually they will say all white men or point at me. I'll ask them how I am oppressing them right now. They are usually at a loss for words. I conclude by saying if they ever find the patriarch to give me a call so I can get my pitchfork too. It's easy to wave your hands and claim oppression but the reality is that white American women suffer relatively little oppression. So little they can almost nev…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:59 PM
3

Equating forced conscription to voluntary childbirth is totally inaccurate. One is slavery. The other is a choice.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/20 04:24 PM
1

Sex with a minor is always rape because minors can not give legal consent. Though there appears to be a large double standard by the media and the legal system where it is far more permissible for women to perpetrate this kind of rape against boys than for men to perpetrate it against girls. Same crime buy very different media coverage and different legal sentencing.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:38 PM
2

Double standard. Man rapes woman headline says rape and shows the ugliest mugshot they can dig up. Woman rapes man and they find some other wordsmithing like woman has sex with boy. The word vomit in this headline says so much. There are people and by people I mean feminists and legal scholars who believe women can literally not rape. Like it is somehow impossible.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 04:53 AM
12

Laughing at the term "openly feminist feminists". In a way, this type is easier to deal with. They show their hate more clearly. I'm starting to thank these people for exposing the movement for what it really has become. A bunch of irrational women who just hate men for being born as men. What I worry about are the people who still equate feminism as a movement for gender equality or to uplift women and not the hate movement against men it has evolved into. Gently waking these people up with har…
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:13 PM
9

Holy crap I want to shake this guys hand.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 08:10 PM
1

A judge would question upholding a noncompete agreement if the employer fired you. Not all contracts are enforceable. Noncompetes are notorious for being thrown out when challenged. Especially if they are overly broad in duration (more than a few months to a year) or scope (for example banning working anywhere in the country when the company only has a regional presence), you were forced to sign it or your exit from the company wasn't voluntary. You need a labor attorney.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:20 AM
2

Sue them. They aren't paying you the bonus and have no legitimate reason not to. You are the one being harassed and facing a hostile workplace. Seriously. Lawyer up. This is just the beginning. They will not stop until you lose your job. Hit back now with real force before it's too late.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:17 AM
3

bUt guiSe thEy Do tHe SamE Work!!! Seriously. If you could pay women less to do the same work, men would be replaced with women. Its basic economics. The reality is men work longer hours, have fewer gaps in employment, negotiate more aggressively for salary and gravitate towards different competencies than women. All of those things are variables that the wage gap myth doesn't bother to control for and every one is a personal choice. Also no one went around using their "power" to force anyone to…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 08:27 PM
9

Here's a few more to add. Name anything that makes for a modern quality of life. It was probably invented by a man. The roads bridges houses, cars and pretty much everything else you use every day was predominantly built by a man. Most small businesses are founded and run by men. More acts of heroism are committed by men.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 07:51 PM
4

Feminism hasnt been about equal rights for 30 years. Feminism is a hate movement against men that loses more legitimacy every single day as it is twisted by the most extreme practitioners.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:37 PM
2

This is wrong I've never seen this group deny legitimate victims.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:24 AM
18

What? Women abusing power? I thought only men did that.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:29 PM
71

You should go to your manager as well as the most senior person in HR and tell them you're being harassed. Don't wait. Do it now. If they don't side with you, get a workplace attorney and tell them the same thing. Either that or get a new job. Whatever is less hassle. My understanding is that IT jobs are ultra high demand and a lot of people get raises when they change employers.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 06:40 AM
1

If there's good news, it's that you only pay alimony for half the duration of the marriage and it's not automatic by any means. That's a maximum number she is pointing out.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:49 PM
2

What a tool.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 11:26 PM
5

There's feminists who want equality and feminists who want everyone to hate men. Specifically white men. The latter group are not actually feminists but wish to be identified as such because it allows them a platform to spread their bigotry. Their ideas center on a hierarchy of oppression rather than equality. For example they will suggest that a black trans women deserves to be heard more than a white woman who of course deserves to be heard more than any man. It's the opposite of equality. It'…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 05:51 AM
4

Why are there women only cars?
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:04 AM
3

Exactly what I meant when I called it a half truth. There are lots of reasonable explanations for a small wage gap that don't involve discrimination. It mostly comes down to the personal choices that women make (that put family and flexible working hours first) and personal choices that men make (that put high wages above all else). Both are driven by societal stereotypes and peer pressure and it is those pressures that are the real problem. Not discrimination. Life is full of choices. Women wan…
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:22 PM
2

What's the downside? Just do it for a school you're going to any way.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:12 AM
12

Increasingly it seems the STEM discrimination myth is headed towards the same fate as the gender wage gap myth. Something that the majority of people recognize as being a half truth. It is nice to know that there's still legitimate unbiased gender studies research taking place and that it's possible for that material to find publication.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:00 AM
4

This isn't so much sexist as it is stupid.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 02:31 PM
2

Radical feminists are far from being normal. There is a brand of feminism that is so toxic that even calling it feminism is wrong. It's just radicalism. It's like nazis calling themselves conservatives or something. It's not the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:41 PM
13

I would have hit her back. In the gut. Where there would be no bruises. One punch. Just hard enough for her to realize how stupid and dangerous it is to attack someone like that.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:57 AM
13

So before you fuck someone you need to give them a breathalyzer or you're a rapist? Silly feminists. That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:28 AM
0

Jess sounds like a real slut.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:15 PM
2

Seeing this lawsuit get shut down will be nice.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:15 AM
1

This type of thought takes a special type of narcissism.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:54 PM
2

This is obviously an example of STEM fields discriminating against women.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:02 PM
-9

This.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 02:55 PM
31

Yeah women want men who are attractive and the only way for a man to be beautiful is to be circumcised. I bet she also thinks that men should tell women how beautiful they are no matte how overweight or unkempt they are. What a fucking hypocrite. Call it for what it is. Feminist hypocricy. If someone cut off the tip of a babys finger and justified it by saying it was madically safe and that they wouldnt miss it a judge would laugh in their face and throw them in jail. I don't understand why male…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 03:55 PM
-1

Feminism means gender equality. Look it up.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:34 PM
-1

Upvoted because truth. Like the vast majoroty of this sub, I'm for gender equality so I don't have a problem with feminism. I have a problem with ignorant radicals who call hatred and bigotry towards men feminism but like all hatred and bigotry that is just ignorance. I also have a problem that some important parts of our society like schools and courts have institutionalized discrimination against all men and boys. None of this means that I disapprobe of feminism or that there is some kind of c…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:15 PM
8

I hope they attack them with all of those charges.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 08:07 PM
3

Im glad we can determine personality and motives from two sentences of text and a photo.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:19 PM
12

This isn't a verdict, it's a maximum sentence. We all know she's going to get 2 years and community service.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:40 PM
3

Then why do salons charge more for "long hair" cuts? Gee could it be that they take more knowledge and time to perform? Theres a reason most women dont go to barbershops. At the end of the day you get what you pay for amd you're paying for a 15 minute job. Cutting long hair is different and not sexist to identify the differences.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:55 PM
2

Because he wasn't qualified to? Its a harder argument to buy for sure. In anycase thats not what happened. Theres no question cutting long hair takes a lot more skill and time. Even at a women's salon they tend to differentiate between a simple short haircut and long hair stylings for purely economic reason that one takes more time to perform. They just arent the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:53 PM
39

Its amazing how entitled people are becoming when it comes to making other people do things for them. Why should anyone ever be obligated to cut your childs hair?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:26 AM
-1

You know someone is just going to argue that people have the right to commit suicide and big brother should leave them alone.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter