TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LennartGimm Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by LennartGimm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nobody said anything about „everything free“ but how about the stuff that we need to survive? Like food and medicine?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 11:27 PM
14

Huh, didn’t know that, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:55 PM
30

Trans exclusionary radical feminist. Basically, they‘re so far left that they took a right and ended up hating trans people because „they‘re not real women“ (neither trans men, who betray the sisterhood, nor trans women, who are infiltrators). Hated by the right for being feminist, hated by the left for being against trans rights, a bunch of shitheads in short.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:16 PM
10

How is r/traa a hate subreddit?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:13 PM
1

So where do you see the problem? Do you think that these measures wouldn‘t reduce carbon emissions? Or that a carbon tax won‘t give the state more money? Just saying „no“ is not a counterpoint.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/19 10:26 AM
1

Yeah, that flat earth thing wasn‘t an argument. In my eyes, both groups are similarly crazy, but they aren‘t the same. Thanks for the explanation though. So either the science behind CO2 being a GHG is wrong or the amounts of CO2 we measure in the atmosphere is wrong. Good read on the topic because it also mentions your argument. Science is a rough term to use here. Mathematical sciences are based on what‘s true. We just discover what is true, but that doesn‘t change the world around us. The pro…
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 04:14 PM
1

What does „heat rises before CO2“ even mean? But great shirt to out yourself as a lunatic, maybe go with flat earth cap for the double takedown.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 12:09 PM
1

Make flying more expensive, tax carbon emissions, ban cruise ships. You know what that would do? It would give the state more money to tackle new projects like wind farms and pumped-storage hydroelectricity. And it would at least reduce the carbon footprint a little until the major changes can be implemented like research on better energy storage for affordable electric cars and the such. To say we‘re doing the best we can if we‘re doing nothing (we are actually making it worse and worse each ye…
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 12:07 PM
1

What do you mean jack shit? We have more people going on cruises than ever before, we are eating more meat and we are releasing more CO2. What else do you want us to do? Not fuck up more and more each year? Capitalism is built on growth and that means we have to make bigger mistakes next year!
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 11:58 AM
1

If we continue on our current path, we don‘t have centuries. The young people haven‘t made the bed, they shouldn‘t have to lay in it. The boomers have made the bed and gotten rich off it, how about they suffer the consequences?
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/19 11:54 AM
2

Breats cancer (link in German) : One in eight women will get breast cancer, with 70000 new cases and 15000 deaths each year. Prostate cancer (also in German) : 25% of men get prostate cancer in their lives, with 60000 new cases in 2013 (seems weird that the number of percentages is higher but the new cases are lower.) This link also says that it‘s the third deadliest cancer in Germany, after lung- and bowel cancer. So this would mean that it‘s at least deadlier than breast cancer, but I‘m confus…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:45 AM
1

Ah cool, you want to revisit something from our conversation? Here are some questions I've asked, which I'd really enjoy hearing your answers about. Feel free to pick a few. A family always starts with two people, not just one, so why is only one of them suffering for it? Wouldn‘t it be fair for the man to have to financially support her, because she is now less able to? How is it completely legal to ignore due process for men? What is your contribution to STEM then? Have you ever done anything …
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 04:25 PM
1

Yeah, so what? There‘s a lot of points I disagree with feminism on, why shouldn‘t I be here?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 02:17 AM
1

No, women are not better. Neither are men. People are fucking individuals and a statistic says next to nothing for a single person. And I‘m not „on board“ with feminism just because I disagree with you. The world isn‘t black and white and I don‘t align myself with an ideology and just stop my thought processes there because the group already decided for me, what I as part of the group now believe.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 02:11 AM
1

WHY ARE WE SCREAMING If you make headway in your field, you advance „the cause“. How much advancement you make depends on your subject, your resources, your environment, the type of theory you want to test, how concentrated you work and a lot of other stuff. Just like with anything else, success is never dependent on one factor alone (not even your genitals, weirdly enough)
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 02:05 AM
1

Oh, sorry for being happy to talk about my subject. You asked question and I wanted to answer it for you in more than 10 words, but don‘t worry, I will no longer confuse you with any details, just very general stuff, got it. You‘re now also saying that having more enthusiasm leads to getting more done, which it doesn‘t necessarily. If you want me to explain further, I’m happy to, but I wouldn’t want to give you too much to read at once now, would I? Getting people more involved is good, but does…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 01:58 AM
1

Well first of all I have no idea what this has to do with our debate here, but let‘s go down that road, alright. The point of physics is very much up for debate and depends highly on what point you‘re arguing from. Some politicians might say that physics should send people to the moon/mars and further the political and economic power and prestige of their country (looking at you, spacerace). The CEO of a big company will tell you that physicists should find ways to make stuff more efficient. Fin…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 01:48 AM
1

So you‘re saying because women are more enthusiastic about their field they‘re better than men? You know that it takes more to be a good student, right?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 12:55 AM
1

Yeah way to miss the point, well done buddy. I‘m not saying that women are better than men. The women in my field are simply more enthusiastic about their studies than men. This might also be because women and men show enthusiasm differently. It‘s nothing that I can say in general about men and women (would be very hard to get statistics on something like that), but it‘s a trend I can see in many different subjects that I get into contact with. But I feel like I‘m talking to a brick wall by now.…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 12:49 AM
1

Lady? Nah, I‘m not a lady, pretty far from that actually. I‘m a 21 year old dude who studies physics. Going for my bachelors right now. Also why is it projecting when I take your statement of „if I could get away with doing nothing, I‘d do nothing“ and take from this that you have no drive? You pretty much admitted that, but maybe you just phrased it very poorly. Yeah, there is something in it for women in STEM: They fucking care! The women I‘ve met in physics, maths and other STEM fields (which…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 12:32 AM
1

So because you‘re lazy and have no drive to do anything with your live, if you weren‘t forced to, everybody else has to be that way. Got it. Btw, why would men go into something like physics? I mean, your reasoning here would imply that men do it to earn money while women go into other courses to be lazy, but there is so many courses easier than physics or maths to earn a ton of money, why chose a hard one? Or could it be that they‘re interested in the subject? And couldn‘t that imply that women…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 12:15 AM
1

That‘s just you making up reasons without really putting yourself in the other sides shoes. But fine, believe that 50% of all humans are lazy, stupid and childish. Oh and of course they all hate you. You as an individual because you have a penis and that just drives all of them mad. Don‘t for a single second believe that women, like all humans, have reasons for what they do and circumstances that force them to act a certain way at some times. No no no, it‘s much easier if everyone fits into this…
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/19 12:07 AM
1

That‘s why I explained why I didn‘t mention the wage gap explicitly: It is bullshit, just like the pink tax. But the data doesn‘t lie: Women are paid less, just not for the same work. Maybe let‘s look at the reasons why women don‘t work the same, and I think family can really mess up a career. And a family always starts with two people, not just one, so why is only one of them suffering for it? I also explicitly say that this was anecdotal. I know that it proves nothing, but I liked throwing it …
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/19 01:19 PM
1

I was going off of the proposed idea that feminism is sexist because the name implies it by concentrating on one group: Women. MRAs would be, according to that particular idea, sexist as well. If they are sexist (meaning the members individually or the groups direction as a whole) was not what I was trying to argue. But to the argument you made: You say feminism is complaining about having no rights, then you name a lot of rights that men and women both have. By this standards, men and women bot…
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/19 12:37 PM
1

Okay, once again you don‘t answer to any of my points, but that‘s alright. It‘s sad that you had to go through such things. But I never wanted to silence you, did I? I never said that your opinions aren‘t valid or shouldn‘t be said/heard. On the contrary, you have a good basis for your arguments, if what you say is true. But other people have a good basis for their arguments, even if their opinions might differ. The fact that you shut yourself off from any potential persuasion is sad to see beca…
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/19 11:09 AM
1

So for you, saying „low class jobs“ is an elitist tangent? Or was it me saying that people are aware that electricity doesn‘t just come from their wall? I have now twice explained to you that I know these jobs have to be done, even though some may be unpleasant. I am thankful that they are being done and that I don’t have to do them because frankly: I don’t want to. Just like I don’t want to be a doctor, but I’m greatful that there are doctors. Which of my statements is elitist? When did I say t…
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/19 12:41 AM
1

Yes I have a good grasp of English but as it‘s not my first language, there‘s still some things I get wrong. As can be seen by the fact that I had to correct myself twice now. I would ask you what exactly was disingenuous about me saying that English isn‘t my first language (I never said that I was bad at it, only that I may phrase some things wrong), but seeing as you haven‘t answered a single one of my questions and not really answered any points I made, that‘d be pretty pointless by now. We a…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 11:09 PM
1

Alright then, what are my views on „low class jobs“? (why are you still referring to them as such when you seemed offended by the term initially, and I corrected myself?) Because I have only said that more men work in them (which you then indirectly agreed to) and that I‘m thankful that people do them and I know that they‘re necessary. Those are the views I‘ve stated and I stand by them because I see nothing wrong here. You seem to have come to the conclusion that I think of any job not requirin…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 10:12 PM
1

That‘s why I put „lower class jobs“ into parentheses. You‘re right, I should‘ve chosen my words more carefully. I did not mean that I consider them lower than any other jobs, it just seems to me that society has treated them as such. I should have said something along the lines of „generally less sought after jobs“, but I didn‘t and that is my mistake. Once again, I‘m sorry for any offence you took in that, although none was meant to be given. Also please bear in mind that as stated before, Engl…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 08:54 PM
1

Alright, good to know I was overthinking it. I‘m German so English is not my first language, which might explain my slightly different sense of the meaning of words like sexism and nationalism. For me, they are linked with bad intentions in a way, although one can be sexist without knowing it, that‘s why I mentioned harm before. You say you don‘t project your position here, but you‘re clearly condemning the modern feminist movement. I agree that there are some very radical feminists, but they ar…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 06:22 PM
1

Okay I think I got your point now. Let me state your point in my own words so you can tell me, if I still have it wrong: Feminism is sexist as per the word, FEMinism. MRAs are not inherently bad just because there is an „ist“ at the end of activist. Both points I agree with. Then in one response you said that MRA are sexist which very much confused me. But they also want to display the discrimination of sexist laws, which kind of goes against that they‘re sexist. And then you made your point cle…
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 01:29 PM
1

But doesn‘t that go against you initial statement or am I completely lost?
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 07:11 AM
1

I‘m not sure I‘m following you. Could you rephrase that?
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/19 12:46 AM
2

Well, by the same reasoning MRAs are sexist.
/r/AntiFeminists26/03/19 10:23 PM
3

You think she can also do another pose?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/19 11:13 AM
6

It‘s sad to see hate on here. Mens rights are a topic in dire need of discussion and there are not many places where you can do so and find support, sadly. I get that it can be frustrating, but hate just undermines what we hope for on here, doesn‘t it? Mens rights are too often equated with women-hating and the everlasting patriarchy, so let‘s try to disprove that point entirely.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 08:01 PM
10

For me too! But I loved her as a guest on the show, she was so sympathetic. Not anymore I guess...
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:43 PM
11

Come on. That‘s just an „us against them“-mentality. There are some weird feminists with evil ideas, but to say women are pure evil, that‘s wrong
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:42 PM
10

Do you mean „Boys need positivity“? I mean, you don‘t need to be funny or smart to deserve positivity. Everyone, especially every child deserves a positive live and environment. But maybe you meant something else, care to clarify?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:20 AM
1

Ah, cool, I guess I misunderstood . Then I guess he has about the same opinion I expressed, that it‘ kind of close minded to be unable to have friends with differing opinions. Still, I‘d not like having someone on my friends-list who spams my feed with politics.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 06:21 AM
2

I mean, can he really say that? Of course, everyone has to decide for themselves who they consider friends. But to say you can‘t be friends with someone, who disagrees with you, that‘s hard. I think you would need to re-evaluate your views at that point. But that goes for those, who unfriend him, too. If they do so, because of his beliefs, and not because he is constantly annoying everyone on fb with his political views, whatever they be.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:32 PM
16

But lumping all kinds of cultures together would be weird. How do you make a statistic about divorces that treats the US and Saudi Arabia in the same way? I think you either divide by country, like here, or by culture (so western culture with the US, Canada and Western Europe, as well as Australia and New Zealand). Question then is: Who draws the line? So I think a stat like this being US-centric makes sense for a US citizen to post. I as a German obviously will have to look up different studies…
/r/MensRights15/07/18 06:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter