TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lethal_Ledgend Archive

View 2 posts and 128 comments by Lethal_Ledgend on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

GeneralLethal_Ledgend/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:19 AM
1

Anti-MRMLethal_Ledgend/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:05 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Don't forget the the "wokest" people are usually the ones deepest in dreamland. The reason wokism is usually rejected in this community is because we spend an awful amount of our time bareing the brunt of it's hypocrisy particularly out white members because wokism likes to hold us almost solely responsible for not just our problems but the problems of everyone else.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:08 AM
2

My default response is "well, when women create a more successful society than ours, then I'll respect their suggestions".
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:15 AM
-36

I disagree the fact that it's old enables us to see how far we've come. So it's depressing not worse.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 10:31 AM
3

Played this game. I still won because having an advantage is only useful if you know how to use it.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:54 AM
1

What exactly does this mean is it a) women's sentence + 63% = man's, or, b) man's sentence - 63%= women's sentence?
/r/MensRights03/05/22 08:42 AM
5

The reason birth control is mostly for women is because women were the ones demanding it more (at the time).
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:45 AM
16

Or adopt. Toxicity is a learnt trait not a genetic one.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:42 AM
3

I think you're using the word "celebrated" a bit loosely there mate.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:42 AM
2

To empower yourself, no sense waiting for some uplifting message pointed our way from the television, it's not coming. But we don't need it to (It'd be nice though) we don't rely on others the wouldn't let us even if we needed to.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:32 AM
12

I've heard I'd said "girls become women on their 18th birthday, boys become men when they earn it" Alternatively: "women are human beings, men are human doings"
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:29 AM
12

For that she was excommunicated.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 08:08 AM
2

Incels aren't something people choose to become it's something people end up as. The women in this thread clearly decided they would be horrible which makes them infinitely worse.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:47 PM
2

I'm honestly surprised they used the word "victim" to describe their targets that's an almost paradoxical level of self-awareness and self-unawareness.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:45 PM
1

People have no more control over what body types there are or aren't attracted to then they have control over which gender or sex they are or aren't attracted to. When fat women verbally abuse men who aren't interested in them it looks to me no different than if a man was to verbally abuse a woman who rejected him on the grounds she was a lesbian.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 06:52 AM
15

Target once banned a shirt that said "Boys will be Boys" closest I've seen to a male equivalent.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 10:47 PM
36

"felt unsupported" not "was unsupported" not "was insufficiently supported", "felt unsupported" which until or unless it's confirmed otherwise I'm assuming the dad did a damn good job supporting the mother (or at least his best) and she was just to self absorbed to see it.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:36 PM
24

Of course she couldn't do that. That's the kind of sentence that snaps people back to reality and causes them to rethink they're life decisions. And she didn't want to do that.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:33 PM
2

Artificial insemination still requires a man. And women weather they admit it or not need men a lot more than we need them. Society is built on the back of hardworking men so take those men away and society crumbles, women go extinct within a decade. Reproduction is something that shouldn't be trifled with lightly, weather or not you believe in a higher power controlling this sort of thing, bad events always follow messing with it. Such as the issues you detailed in your comment following the da…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 11:28 AM
1

I think they could be a fine backup incase the population ever drops too close to extinction but probably shouldn't normalise a replacement for women if it isn't ABSOLUTELY necessary.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 09:48 AM
1

Yes, yes there are. I'd like to say something like make all scholarships gender neutral and say that would solve the issue but there is a definite bias Universities and colleges have that clearly favours girls and women so I doubt that would solve anything.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:56 AM
2

Never
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:13 AM
2

That's where my hope is too mate.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 03:06 AM
5

I prefer to use the term "not just men" because it reminds them that women are just as capable of what ever atrocity they are discussing.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 06:34 AM
5

Over 80% of crimes against children are committed by mother's. Not sure where I first heard that statistic but it's very true. While shitty father's make the news more often CPS has to separate children from their mothers far more often then their fathers.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:32 AM
1

Never thought it be referring to suffering from mental health as "silent but deadly" but I'll take it.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 06:30 AM
39

Tell them you Identify as the rightful owner.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:58 AM
1

Imagine losing all credibility in one sentence.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 05:46 AM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:11 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:11 PM
6

In the video game "Just Cause 3" the bad guy army is all men but the heroes they seem to have no shortage of female soldiers. Also the game "Spider-Man: Miles Morales has female thugs for the hero to fight, but only for the gang who's gets portrayed as "good intentions but bad actions" and the gang of Mercs hired by the Evil White Man they were all men. This has upset me for a while now obviously I understand why game Devs don't want to create games that are just men beating up women but even ga…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:55 AM
10

They have to, they just have to.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 12:21 PM
69

Hide your emotions = "Toxic Masculinity" Show your emotions = "Fragile Masculinity" The secret to winning is finding a strong woman who knows better than to believe in such nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 08:09 AM
1

They call themselves woke despite while refusing to leave the dreamland.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 06:55 AM
1

Sounds a bit too good,. What's the catch?
/r/MensRights11/12/21 01:15 PM
4

To be clear a female applicant would need to be atleast 150% (ass-pull number but you get the point) as deserving as the best male applicant in order to win it. And any woman good enough would most likely apply for a female only scholarship (which exists without contraversy). This was created to be a male only scholarship because even scholarships that claimed to be gender neutral showed an obvious bias towards women applicants. They just had to choose their words carefully to keep it legal. but…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 12:29 PM
12

Modern (3rd wave) feminists, such as the one's in this article, like to blur the line between equality and revenge.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:10 AM
3

Worse part is it wasn't even a male-only scholarship, it was Male-Preferencing meaning a female applicant could still have been chosen if she was good enough.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:09 AM
8

Male-only scholarships are unlawful in my country (Australia) and get blocked by some "Gender-equality" act. the same one that encourages female-only scholarships though so I'd say make sure it's technically legal in where ever you are before your start getting your hopes up.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:05 AM
0

The idea of "Toxic Masculinity" is nothing but misandristic hate speach but for some reason everyone uses it like it's a real thing.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:33 AM
5

They never do. They made a doodle for international pretzel day but not international men's day.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 06:14 AM
16

Stop saying "selfpro-claimed feminist" all feminist's are self proclaimed.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 12:24 AM
0

I'm all for the first two waves of feminism but definitely opposed the the third wave and beyond as well as it's intersectional spin off. Because I believe that's where it's issues started. I think it's important to understand that feminism started as a movement that mutated into an ideology.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:55 AM
1

There is literally no way to get an accurate measurement on this sort of thing, that number was definitely pulled out of someone's ass, and even if there was a way to measure accurately, households tend to do what works best for them. And if that happens to me women doing a little more, or a lot more as some cases may be, thats okay and let them do what works for their household it's a person matter for them that governments have no business interfering with (unless actual crimes are involved, b…
/r/MensRights13/10/21 11:01 PM
2

They only ever wanted selective equality.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 04:40 AM
7

"Church covered up female pedophilia" really, just the Church? Not also the courts, the feminists, hospitals, schools and the news, just the Church? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 11:32 AM
0

Now print them out and plaster randomly across your hometown and see if it reached the news.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:51 AM
4

This sounded like a good thing at the start until I reread and comprehended "China" and realised that those communists have an alternatively bad version of masculinity not the same as the feminist version of masculinity but not actually any better.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 11:00 AM
21

I a while ago saw a video of a woman going on about how she saw a black man walking towards her and she decided to cross the street to avoid him. She was half in tears lamenting that she wanted to clarify that "she was crossing the street because he was man not because he was black". Like that somehow makes it better. "Don't worry sir I'm a misandrist not a racist, my bigotry is okay because dispite coming from the same place as all other bigotry it's okay because it's socially accepted. Please …
/r/MensRights25/09/21 10:34 AM
3

All feminists are self proclaimed.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 07:12 AM
9

Now, I'm know lawyer but I do have a friend called Google and he's telling me that manslaughter can't have "malice aforethought" which Google confirmed means intent to kill or harm. I'd wager that someone leading a boy to where her friends can attack him counts as malice aforethought. And what about the other charges she should have like, manipulation of a mentally handicapped individual, subduction of a minor, conspiracy to commit murder and probably more that an actually legally savvy person m…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:57 AM
1

If a man hides his emotions, than that's "toxic masculinity" but if a man shows his emotions than that's "fragile masculinity". Both are misandristic terms used to shame and control men though so don't let these labels dictate how you express your emotions. Men know that women can and lots do manipulate men through their emotions so thats another reason they don't feel comfortable expressing them or seeing others express theirs. For me it's not about hiding or repression it's about control. I do…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 05:42 AM
2

It is unlawful to have a male ONLY scholarships. Males can still be awarded scholarships that aren't for anyone of specific gender.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:49 AM
6

In Australia it is illegal for an academic scholarship to only be available to male applicants under the anti discrimination laws however there are literally tens of thousands of female only scholarships. Also look up Hermesmann V. Seyer (WARNING: it'll piss you right off) it wasn't done by feminists but they have stopped multiple attempts to overturn it and the precetents it set. And it's also the story that made me officially support this movement.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 05:43 AM
2

These can be done in any order but work best in concert with each other. Some may seem harsh but it's about loving and showing people the error of their hateful ways and hoping they fix themselves rather than about hatred and destruction wanting them so suffer. When she calls you a chauvinist ask her what it means, most feminists don't actually know and are far more chauvinistic then the people they criticise. Research men's rights and issues, even if she doesn't believe you it's good to prove t…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:58 AM
2

Both of those accusations were quickly proven false and were obviously politically motivated that's why neither stuck. The two victims were also rich as fuck and were pre lawyered up. And yet dispite the accusations being proven false there are people in the world who will forever believe these men are guilty. That's not going to affect these men as much as it would other men, but it's certainly not something anyone inocent if such crimes deserves to bear.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 11:48 PM
1

First and second waves of the movement were good everything after those tried to shift it into a cult like ideology which I hold entirely responsible for its bad parts. There also isn't enough done to adress it's hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 05:46 AM
4

Male only scholarships are illegal in my country (Australia) but female only scholarships are encouraged even scholarships that are offered to either gender have a bias towards female applicats. This means that there is a significant drop in the amount of men in higher education.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:38 AM
1

I can't think of anything to call such women other than bigots (or synonyms to that effect) I'd understand if she was personally victimised recently but letting bad experiences turn you against an entire demographic of people for life isn't acceptable. In highschool I was bullied. The bully was black. I, now an adult, have no issues with people of any skin colour, but by the logic used by these bigots not only would it be "ok if I hated black" people, but "it's weird that I don't". Bad experienc…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:03 AM
1

They ask yes or no questions but then tack on conditions to the answer like "yes because X" or "no uless y" the question were clearly geared to confide people who took the test in order to skew results.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:06 AM
6

There's an old MRA saying that describes this issue "when you are accustomed to privileged, equality feels like oppression". Women demanded equality not realising they were privileged more times than they were oppressed.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 07:05 AM
7

To be fair they don't care about the mental health of men outside of gaol either.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:18 AM
5

Alternative reading. Boys username = fun or something they think is cool Girls username = pretentious and superficial. Most insults can be reversed if you think about it hard enough.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 10:44 AM
4

Claiming that "an erection is equal to content" would be like claiming "she wanted it because she was ovulating".
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:48 AM
2

I'd rather spare the guilty than punish the innocent.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:39 AM
3

Please don't call it a "He-Man Show". It doesn't deserve his name.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:07 AM
8

It's most likely a licensing issue the same reason the She-Ra show couldn't so much as reference He-Man. IP licensing is weird like that.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:05 AM
0

Well I'm Australian 🇦🇺 so none of this applies to me barring some international conflict (touch wood).
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:16 PM
8

Yeah I goofed here. Left it up because I thought it would serve some levity.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 11:10 AM
85

How is, what I can only describe as "a form of military slavery," more rights. If anything this is evidence of having rights taken. Edit: immediately after posting my comment I realised the title was sarcastic.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 11:03 AM
0

Do you think abortion is painless? Fetusus grow their pain receptors at 18 weeks the idea of giving them painkillers is mocked and in dispute of toxic propaganda, are in fact living human beings same as you or I. I'd rather neither exist but if I had to choose one to continue in the world it would be circumcisions because at least those children survive.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 01:12 PM
7

My point was already agreeing with you (by sarcasticly agreeing with them) I'm sorry for not getting that point across clearly.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:53 PM
4

Sure, why not? Cosmetic companies are also experimenting with aborted and miscarried fetuses so why not? just fucken throw decency out, no one uses that stuff anyway.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 09:00 AM
1

This is a good message. I found this sub after finding Roma Army's and believe it or not lots of the loudest MRA members are in fact women that gave me hope for the future.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 05:43 AM
1

Children created in this way are born with serious health defects. Very few make it out of infancy and none have made it to puberty. What might interest you is that there is also possible for a sperm cell to implant in any cell type not just eggs. Though this has never been tested in humans it has worked in several generations of rats.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 10:56 AM
1

Either you were never bullied as a child or more likely you were the bully.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 04:03 AM
3

Whatever you waisted my morning, probably the closest you'll ever come to an achievement. Once again I hope she sees this bro all the best in you attempts at learning to read👍.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 04:01 AM
4

I literally told you I'd done that your reading comprehension is terrible.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:56 AM
3

Once again not an answer to my question. And I have read her comments I'm not going to look for all of them they come up frequently enough as it is. And the ones that have come up are all changing the subject so she can win an entirely different argument than the one already being had.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:53 AM
2

So she has no valid points for you to supply? I knew that but you can't just change the subject because I've got you at a loss. And name one fallacy I've used.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:47 AM
2

I'll admit I can't say I've read them all but how many of them were off-topic comments in order to set up strawmen so that she could act like the moral superior in the conversation? That's what she did to my comment, that's what she's done to every comment in which I saw her responding, and if you can find one that doesn't distract from the point (false accusations and the bs reason's men don't see justice) then what was it?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:42 AM
2

My delusions? you're the one who seems to think she had more than one "point"
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:23 AM
4

I literally invalidated her piont in one sentence, did you even read my response? Or her's?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:20 AM
4

You know, I did try to reason with her. It's in another response to her comment I at least put in the effort to go on the high road. It didn't work and now here we are. I'm debating Reddit morality with some r/whiteknighting fool who is only circling the issue rather than addressing it. I've done nothing worse than she has. I've done nothing illegal, I haven't even dropped below a moral threshold and you're still going after me I hope she notices you you've clearly put a lot of effort into this.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 03:05 AM
4

That's immature
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:49 AM
5

What? You gonna tell me I should've taken the high road? Retaliation is a nessicary part of defence.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:30 AM
3

Fictional? No rapists DO exist I had not realised that's what you were confused about. Yeah rape happens. It's about the worst thing you could do to someone without killing them. Clothing is mostly irrelevant I've definitely playing up their importance for the sake of messing with a misandristic troll. I'm sorry you got caught up in my performance only to miss the point of it completely. She was changing the point of an argument in order to knock down a straw-man of her own creation so I fortifi…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:54 AM
7

Most don't you're right about that but I made sure to clarify the type of rapist that does. The sporadic kind that await opportunity. It's not the only factor they look for I'll admit but it shouldn't be dismissed as irrelevant either.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:43 AM
10

The part about rape was actually true. The part about the investigation process is what I made up.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:32 AM
7

Yes she is that's why I make fun of her.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:22 AM
9

She is a troll and pretty much yeah.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:18 AM
17

She has a history of trolling this subreddit undermining points made and blaming male Victims the name of her account indicates that she only uses it for acts she wants to distance herself from so I'm pretty sure my perception is accurate.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:16 AM
8

I'm responding to a known troll of course it's fallacy
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:58 AM
7

Generally rapist (male and female) will target their potential victims (also male and female) based off how easy the clothes are to remove . This mostly applies to the more sporadic of rapists so knowing what kind of clothes a victim is wearing might help narrow down a suspect list for identifying the perpetrator as different people from different cultures have different experience when it comes to clothing. I'm not sure if it's super useful but it is why they ask those kinds of questions. It's …
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:47 AM
11

No but they are interrogatred about, "what security did you have", "was it locked up", "did you really think it was safe, "why did you put it in this neighbourhood" and the always asked "if it was so important why didn't you put better security on it" which IS equivalent for this kind of case, so YES it's a fair comparison. 😜
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:29 AM
40

This argument always pisses me off. Pergery is a crime one that gets in the way of a lot of criminal convictions and can ruin weeks of police work in a single minute. The whole "it may stop others from coming forward" is never applied to any other crime it's bull shit and they know it. "I'm sorry Timmy, Mrs Smith may have falsely accused you of vandalism and made you pay thousands of dollars compensation as well as lose a year of your life in prison, but if we convict her other victims of vandal…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:04 AM
3

Possibly but then why did she accuse Proctor? I'll disclose that my information is coming from studying the Crucible in high school. I knew Proctor was aged down so it would make sense if Williams was aged up as well.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:06 PM
2

I saw one of these that said the same thing but about slavery in Australia. Australia never had slavery (legally, obviously some people did horrible things but that isn't counted for obvious reasons). It had convict workers (people sentenced to labour after committing a crime) or endentured labour (people working off a Dept they owed) but never slavery. If you consider what I listed as forms of slavery that's fine you're just wrong. (And if you consider what I listed as slavery but refuse to ack…
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:56 AM
16

Yes I believe a teenage girl named Abigail Williams did most of the accusing and lead the group who did the rest. She even famously accused a man named John Proctor whom had previously refused to have an affair with her.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:44 AM
1

The fuck do these cunts think will happen? This is how you grow male resentment and that will literally set equality back (which I'm pretty sure I'd their goal anyway). How do they think these boys will react? "Well golly, I was going to grow up and abuse some women but since my fingernails are now purple I might just change my future plans." That's not how boys work.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:40 AM
44

Covid has killed more men than women but they give men the less effective vaccine? Misandristic fuckery I say.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 02:26 AM
2

You are absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 01:16 AM
8

In history everyone was treated like shit. Women dealt with some shit men didn't, men dealt with a lot of shit women didn't. To claim it was worse for one over another is purely victim mentality.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 10:37 AM
4

If it is satire which you and a few others have claimed. There is no indication given.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 03:40 AM
1

Oooowww look at the edge lord
/r/MensRights09/07/21 03:39 AM
223

These kinds of people are usually the first to get up in arms about a "get back in the kitchen joke" but then don't acknowledge that their jokes are worse. Saying "kill all men" IS worse than saying "get back to the kitchen" and the fact I've had to explain that to women and girls discusts me. One joke plays on stereotypes and references a less than desirable point in history the other evokes and encourages gendercide. Another part that annoys me is they'll demand we stop making "jokes" against …
/r/MensRights09/07/21 01:38 AM
2

Wtf this sounds more like revenge than a solution. Sounds like you're 'bout to explain to me the virtues of parenting licences. You want the man to have all the say unless the woman can prove she's able to handle the responsibility? That isn't the equality this subreddit stands for.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:01 PM
53

Power move: put it on the wedding registry.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:49 PM
114

The way the world's been set up a role reversal would not work. Closest I could think of would be a book titled "How disempower women" which would never get published.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:19 AM
215

Unfortunately that is exactly how is put it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:01 AM
1

I Agree
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:33 AM
482

I remember seeing a book called "How to D.A.M.N." with "D.A.M.N." being an acronym for "Doom A Man Now", the contents of the book details steps, tips, and tricks to help women to make their false accusations more believable and stick longer such as when where and how to plant the seeds and how other women have done so in the past. This is still available on Amazon now. (https://www.amazon.com.au/How-Destroy-Man-Now-Damn/dp/099982032X)
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:50 AM
-1

Hope is good.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:29 AM
2

I disagree with your opinion but in no way blame you for having it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:26 AM
3

That is not only not a solution but it would be the cause of countless new issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:23 AM
7

He's not justifying it he's just stating that it happens. Given the context, I'd wager he's against it.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:11 AM
5

Optimally the man and woman should BOTH want a child and the option be requiring an agreement between the two of them, but I'm gonna chalk that up to awkward fraising. So your opinion is not having children with random women. That's great and I take back calling you immature for not having one. But condoms break, protection is rarely talked about when intoxicated and rapes happen so while you're right about being able to use protection to avoid this issue in the first place you're discrediting t…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:05 AM
0

There was going to be an "indifferent" option but I ran out of Option spaces. Not giving a shit about such an important matter is immature. If your yet to form an opinion that's fine but to claim apathy on this serious issue indicates that you aren't ready to be called an adult yet. The "indifferent" option was easily left out to make room for other options for this reason. The abortion argument is a matter of children's rights Vs women's choices with the financial abortion argument being Men's …
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:45 AM
13

I'd like to point out that this subreddit is largely men complaining. Men have the right to complain it's just taken less seriously if we do it ain't right but it's an entirely different issue than the one you've introduced.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:10 AM
6

Thanks, that's actually the nicest thing that's happenef to me today 👍
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:39 AM
2

we should be equally sexists. Agreed hopefully the numbers will read as 0:0 also still doesnt change that most people downvoted commenters for literally just picking men. That isn't the information I had and I 100% agree with you that that would be used as proof but again I didn't have that info.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:23 AM
4

Ultimately It comes down to the fact that men tend to be bigger, stronger and faster than women. These make some men feel more empowered to commit crimes. If women averaged at being bigger, stronger and faster than men. they'd be more likely to commit crimes. Who is smaller, weaker, slower than women? Children, and which gender commits more crimes against children? Women by >80%
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:14 AM
3

I'd like to agree with what you're saying but the most I can say in that regard is that "Murder" is the wrong word in Australia the legal term is "justifiable homicide" but I don't know where this study was from. The unfortunate reality is that sometimes the only way to survive a situation is for someone else not to. Obviously, incapacitation or immobilization is better but better isn't always an option. It's possible to be both the victim and the victor of a fight that's the whole point of the …
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:07 AM
1

If you options are misandry or misogyny than obviously one is going to be picked. The fact that it happened to be misandry is saddening and does probably prove that the sexism swings against us but not that this is what the majority of people actually want.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:54 AM
10

Neither, Why don't you have a neither option?
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:46 AM
15

It's very true. Saddest part is this even extends to how men treat each other.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 10:40 AM
6

In fairness if there was an option that said "a world with an even split" I'm fairly confident most people would click that one
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:41 AM
1

This reminds me of a another story I heard a while back where a mother killed her three sons because... the father spent more time with his son's than his daughter. The man had three (3) sons and one (1) daughter, to spend an equal time with each child would require him to spend one quarter of his time with each child so of course he spent more time with a sons than his daughter it's just statistics. That's not to say he would have done it perfectly, I don't believe he (or anyone) would time the…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 04:56 AM
2

At least I can say my mother taught my sisters not to hit boys in the balls. I was taught not to hit girls at all under any circumstances and they got only one area they couldn't hit. and that's better than average in this reguard
/r/MensRights14/06/21 02:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter