TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LetsTalkFV Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by LetsTalkFV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

^This^ Absolutely file the injunction for harassment. Which is what this is. Ask your lawyer about the pros/cons of mentioning to her the possibility of suing her for defamation. Unless there's a good reason not to, at least it will make her feel the pain of what she's doing, and put the onus on her to start paying for her own legal defence. Also, I'd suggest the bar owners need to know about this, since it seems they can be held liable as well. You won't have the social heft behind you to make …
/r/MensRights05/01/24 02:26 AM
3

True. I don't disagree. And I'm not disagreeing with your point about an ex (or even disgruntled co-worker, etc...) with an axe to grind possibly being behind this. IF this was done at his table in front of witnesses, instead of taking him aside and conveying this information privately (and especially considering that his banning has become public knowledge) this appears to have been done specifically to publicly humiliate him. Which is the very definition of slander. My point was that his only …
/r/MensRights04/01/24 06:22 PM
3

Actually, he has no idea who 'made this complaint' other than the word of the female bar manager. There could be one complaint, 10 complaints, or zero complaints. Regardless, if this was done in front of witnesses instead of quietly taking him aside, I'm assuming OP has a good civil case for slander - against the bar manager.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:54 PM
2

I'm going to lead this time with this excellent quote from blogger St. Estephe on his post on female serial killers who target women and girls: Simple. Cultural amnesia and psychological denial causes chivalrous men, social constructionists, the "critical theory" (Cultural Marxism") faithful, ordinary misandric "radical feminists" as well as the general public to both overlook and to assiduously censor the history of VbW (Violence by Women). You will find that Johanna Dennehy is -- because of th…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 11:56 PM
1

https://www.amazon.ca/Democracy-Judicial-Dictatorship-Canada-Charter/dp/1082424315/
/r/MensRights13/10/23 02:44 AM
1

Oh, come on. I'm female, and I thought that was hilarious. Good comedic timing. Plus, largely true. I changed a few tires/tyres when younger just to prove that I could. But it's true that men have much more upper body strength for a reason, so it's not really a fair challenge. Plus who really wants to get that greasy and dirty? /s :) Oh, unless you forgot to include the '/s' too? Oh, and btw, hat tip to /u/SchalaZeal01/ for "Canadian Tyre". :)
/r/MensRights13/10/23 02:39 AM
3

Well, anecdotally there are more than a few cases where, at the time of the wife getting a diagnosis of a severe chronic illness, husbands are told by medical professionals some version of: "You can get a divorce, you know." And none, that I'm aware of at least, said to wives of ill men. We know this from patient support groups, said by men supporting their ill wives, who've confessed to having been shocked at being told this. The presence of those husbands in the groups, and the stories by wome…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 07:01 PM
6

r/FemaleSexPredatorNews r/FemaleSexPredatorInfo r/mdsa r/MSSAbuse/ r/surviveher/ https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-aug-16-me-sexpred16-story.html https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-women-are-not-always-the-gentler-sex https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-Female-Sex-Offending-Culture-ebook/dp/B06XDQC9LC/ https://www.academia.edu/29760803/To_a_safer_place_Victims_of_sexual_abuse_by_females_and_their_disclosures_to_professionals While we're at it: https://thewalrus.ca/when-heale…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:17 AM
5

I feel badly about the baby being raised in prison, but I feel worse for the child that will have to grow up for the rest of its life with this mother.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 02:11 AM
1

Barbie was an Americanized 'Lilli' - with very little changed: Lilli was a “golddigger, exhibitionist, and floozy,” Lord said. She had loose morals, small brains and the body of a calendar girl in the comics, where she was often scantily clothed. ​ “She was a pornographic caricature,” Lord said. The character grew so popular in Germany that Lilli developed into a sort of three-dimensional pinup. One of the writers of Barbie’s first commercials told Lord for her book that men would hang the doll …
/r/MensRights18/08/23 10:11 PM
0

Ultimately, this movie is bad for both men and women Heck, ultimately Barbie is bad for both men and women. Whomever first marketed it to little girls, and the parents that went along with that, needed their heads examined. So, does the movie ever bother to disclose that Barbie was originally a German sex doll, marketed to men? Barbie’s ‘pornographic’ origin story, as told by historians Scandal tainted long career of Barbie's creator
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:55 PM
2

I wish I'd read your comment before posting my own, which said more or less the same thing, but not as well. Woman here, btw, and I completely agree. Especially with your last paragraph. I never thought living through my own parents' 'salt the earth' divorce would ever have a silver lining, but it helped me avoid all those negative influences when my own marriage broke down. You need to make a conscious choice to feed the right wolf - even in a divorce.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:57 PM
1

I know this sounds like a stupid question, but is this an acrimonious divorce - as in bitter and no window for reasoned and reasonable discussion? Is this a case of you hating each other now, or more that you just can't get along enough to remain married? Of course, everyone's divorce is contentious, but some people can be reasonable through it, others just can't. My parents went through a 'War of the Roses)' divorce - mainly because of my mother's actions. I vowed I would never be in that kind …
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:31 PM
2

Sorry, OP - just realized you were the author. Had I realized I would have used softer language in my reply above. But my sentiments would be exactly the same, so I'll let it stand. If you really are a fan of her, and a supporter, I'd hope you're willing to look at her suffering, as well as your own, and correct the record for her sake. Feminists (of which I'm not one) often accuse MRAs of being shallow and self-centred. Your article as it stands now would tend to support that. If I might sugges…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:37 PM
2

I'm a huge fan of Pizzey, but have to say there are much better articles out there. This one is far enough off that it's a misrepresentation and does her a major disservice. Erin was the victim in childhood of very serious abuse by her mother - and her father as well but she says her mother's abuse was much worse. THAT's how she knew violence wasn't only perpetrated by men, and THAT's why she was willing to put her head above the parapet to publicly document (not discover) the existance of femal…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 11:23 PM
2

Except that deBekker himself says the information isn't the same, and doesn't apply. ​ Why would you disrespect any helpful information when someone asks? When it's unhelpful in practice, and goes completely against OP's request for stats and resources that will get police to take it seriously? "My male coworker is being stalked by his wife" "Gift of Fear" states violence by women is negligable, extremely uncommon, rarely if ever predatory, and therefore unimportant enough that victims don't nee…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:35 AM
3

That's a joke, right? In Gift of Fear deBecker states outright, like the other commenters on here have said the police believe, that virtually all violence is committed by males, and uses that as the stated reason he doesn't bother to cover violence by women at all in his book. And THAT is despite the reason he got into the field in the first place - as a child he witnessed his mother attempt to murder his step-father whom he loved dearly (shot him in the gut) . That fact you'll find buried in t…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:58 PM
3

Fun fact: female victims of female abuse are also accused of being ... wait for it .... misogynists. And then promptly made invisible - vanished without a trace. And male victims of males - as far as I can tell get lumped into the pro-feminist category for some unknown reason - and they too swiftly never to be talked about again. Boom - both gone from the discussion before you can blink. Thus leaving the field open to make this a solely male vs. female issue using the tired old 'female-good/male…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:32 PM
5

I'm impressed with the number here who are taking this seriously. But there are still too many who view this merely as an 'equity' issue, rather than as potentially threatening. For those treating this casually, I'd suggest taking a gander at these subs, and then rethink what might be going on here: r/FemaleSexPredatorInfo r/FemaleSexPredatorNews
/r/MensRights24/06/23 09:47 PM
2

I hear lots of people cautioning you about recording because it may not be admissible in a court of law. It may not be admissible in court, but it sure as heck is valid and important evidence in a police investigation - which you should start ASAP. Even if 1-party recordings aren't admissible in court, contemporaneous notes always are. Start a log of every interaction, every thing your kids tell you, etc... Take those recordings even if only for the sake of your own documentation, even if you ne…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:22 AM
1

One big drawback to the greyrock approach (which is usually advisable but not in this case): once they get bored they'll do one or both of two things: escalate to get you to react move on to someone else In both cases, that puts your kids square in the crosshairs. When your kids are in danger, wounded bird (a sister approach to greyrock) may be the better way. Birds fake an injury to draw predators away from the nest. The wounded bird approach is to put something* in their way they`ll feel compe…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 03:18 AM
3

This, except police first, hotel second. "I could kill you guys" is frustrated parent talk. "I want to stab you" may be frustrated parent talk, but is also a specific threat. Especially if she's been violent to them in the past. Let the police know you're worried about your children's safety. Make sure you give them a copy of your recordings. They may or may not be admissible in court, but they're sure as heck valid evidence to give to police, and warrant a report, if not an investigation. If yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:56 AM
1

Uncle Buck - John Candy\. Hands down. That scene with the drill at the party? *Chef's kiss. Summer Rental - John Candy John Q. - Denzel Washington Philadelphia - Denzel Washington (peripheral to the story but strong father figure) Big Jake - John Wayne, Katherine O'Hara, stars 3 of Wayne's own sons To Kill a Mockingbird - Gregory Peck Big Country - Gregory Peck, Charlton Heston (not a father, but sensational father figures - all about integrity) *Seems John Candy's kids felt the same way about h…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:47 PM
2

Elaine Campione: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/mom-killed-daughters-for-spite-court-told-1.872969 https://www.barrietoday.com/local-news/barrie-mom-who-drowned-daughters-granted-continued-escorted-absences-5145886
/r/MensRights29/05/23 04:11 AM
6

That depends - we don't have enough information to know one way or the other. Odds are, if previous cases/trends are anything to go by, this was her daughter, and a husband who wasn't the father. If that's the case, which would you consider more harmful to the victim - that her stepfather raped her daily for three years, or that her OWN MOTHER chose the man, offered her to him, encouraged (or at least allowed) him to rape her daily for three years, filmed it (and turned her daughter into a child…
/r/MensRights29/03/23 04:06 PM
24

​ Perry, 36, of Monongahela Township, pleaded guilty to one charge of criminal solicitation involving sexual deviate intercourse with a child, 15 counts each of sexual abuse of children by photographs or film, corruption of minors and dissemination of photos of a child – all felonies – and eight misdemeanor counts of indecent assault of a child. State police accused Cheyenna Perry of recording videos and photos of an 11-year-old girl whom she directed to perform various sexual acts. Perry is see…
/r/MensRights29/03/23 03:54 PM
6

What happened to you, not to mention your wife with stage 4 cancer, is abhorent, and you have my sincere sympathy. Just yesterday I became aware that Judith Herman (the author of the classic PTSD book "Trauma and Recovery") has just published a new book: "Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice". I would imagine this subject would hit close to home for you. Her original 1992 book - long considered a classic - was chock full of all the fashionable feminist tropes. Which was somewh…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:50 PM
1

Btw, the pay gap starts when women have kids, theres no data showing childless women are systematically paid less, its starts after childbirth And even that is a statistical sleight of hand that no-one seems to have noticed. By removing children from the equation the PTB have neatly eliminated any notion of 'family' from consideration. The core of our culture and civilisation up to this point - family - has been surgically removed from the calculations. Unless and until males (sigh) x/y-chromoso…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:12 PM
1

Excellent comment.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:53 PM
2

Paulo Friere I'd never heard of him before. Thank you for that reference.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:52 PM
2

I hope you have a blog or substack somewhere teaching others how to do this for themselves. Teaching both males AND females, btw. If not, I hope you'll consider starting one. What you're doing needs to be a movement. A quiet revolution. Once this technique becomes commonplace, all the air will go out of this nonsense. A decade or so ago the majority of women refused to identify as feminists, which is, imo, part of the reason this has been escalated so aggressively (mainly to stun the young women…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 08:46 PM
2

Wowl Thank you for this link.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 01:27 PM
6

Mary Beth Tinning. 9 dead children. Her children were instrumental in the development, or at least popular acceptance, of the diagnosis of SIDS in the first place. Even though at least one of them happened past the age of 5 (if I remember correctly, at any rate far too old for SIDS). Until, that is, the similar death of a relative's child (#9) she was caring for, upon which the excuses fell apart (genetically speaking) and FINALLY the finger of suspicion fell upon 'poor Mary'. At which point she…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:27 PM
2

Just as a point of order, did you (he) criticize 'feminists' or all women in general? Not that it would probably matter in this case, but it might in the next. The women who support men's rights in particular, as well as the women who don't hold with sexism or favouritism in general, would probably appreciate not having their support lumped in with those who take advantage.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 01:30 AM
1

True. But I think this falls into the 'it's better to ask forgiveness than permission' category. Probably worth the risk in most cases. It may not be admissible in court, but it will still be considered by everyone else, and would make a difference. Any 'invasion of privacy' would tend to be balanced out by evidence of wrong-doing by the complaining party. At worst, the person recording could use it to make VERY ACCURATE contemporaneous notes. https://www.forensicnotes.com/contemporaneous-notes/
/r/MensRights26/01/23 09:35 PM
4

Be careful here going the legal route - this can be a case of winning the battle but losing the war. Your case may be successful, but if you have the bulk of your career years ahead of you your reputation for litigation may precede you in any future contract negotiations. For sure contact a lawyer, but do not initiate any suit or escalation until AFTER you've secured (and started) your next position. If you do decide to litigate or make an official complaint, for the next year or two be the abso…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 12:17 AM
6

Came here for the discussion on misandry, stayed for the lessons on Stoicism. Well done lads (and lasses)!
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 12:15 AM
0

Of course you didn't. No substance, snipe and run. Right in character for you. Well done.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:03 PM
0

And there what is? Really, what? Perhaps I should have led with my first impression. Which was, I was torn between whether you were just being an a**hole or whether you're a feminist posing as an MRA on here just trying to 'prove' what they say about people on this sub. I'm a female who's survived female perpetrated torture and sadism, but who isn't so full of myself I can't support men and men's rights and recognize the common ground. My abuser was a self-declared rabid feminist. Along side my …
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:55 AM
4

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/barbara-kay-women-are-not-always-the-gentler-sex
/r/AntiFeminists14/10/22 03:51 AM
0

Clearly they're not, or they wouldn't be posting here in support of men, nor criticizing feminism's impact on everyone. But you already knew that. So what is it with your comment - especially in this context? Have you been so hurt by abusive women who identify as feminists that you're unable to recognize or care about the girls who are also being harmed: brainwashed into turning against men - against your interests, against their own interests, and against the well-being of society at large? Are…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:56 PM
6

I couldn't agree with you more re: "society is raising women incorrectly". I don't have children (was raised to be a 'strong independent woman' - by abusive women) and can only imagine how difficult this must be for you trying to raise a daughter. Same thing for sons, of course. Are you getting any traction when trying to raise your daughter to resist this malign influence? As a society, women have a very narrow healthy reproductive window - a few short years - which is why I believe the influen…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 05:13 PM
2

BTW, thank you to the person who so thoughtfully PM'd me to "inform" me that "Men commit more crime than women in every country on earth". No references cited - so a self-evident truth, surely? How thoughtful of you! I've filed your helpful message under 'Spam'. That was what you intended, was it not?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 04:11 PM
0

Feminists ignore female crime constantly. Agreed. And feminists actively attack female victims of female crime in particular - so successfully that even in these kinds of discussions it's still invisible. Can't let that narrative get out, else we'd have to shift focus away from violence being a male vs. female issue (when the truth is closer to gender symmetry regardless of whether we're talking against or between sexes). They'll instantly go after and attempt to destroy female victims who try t…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:50 PM
0

"Believe all victims" "Believe all women"
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:38 PM
3

I'm not convinced that "men get caught more" (unless by "caught" you mean convicted) is the reason. I think the detection rate (&/or suspicion) of women committing crimes is pretty high; it's not the 'getting caught' bit that's so much the issue, as the 'following up' bit. Men get investigated more, men get prosecuted more, men therefore get convicted more. Women get let off more, women get down-charged more (as in lesser charges than their actual offence), women get excused more. A big portion …
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:32 PM
8

What you say about women "deferring" is probably true in the cases of hybristophilia, and your points about evolutionary selection and choosing dark triad men are very valid. But I suspect this (deferring) is far less true in most cases of male/female partner crime - even though they're usually documented and prosecuted that way and the women always treated as secondary criminals. For partner crimes I wouldn't actually use the term "deferring". "Purposely choosing", or even "orchestrating" would…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 02:22 PM
4

Meghan Markle's rich benefactor, for one thing. FWIW.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:07 PM
6

​ History doesn't fit neatly into feminism's "men oppress women" view. It's much more nuanced than that. It's not actually all that nuanced. In fact, it's not nuanced at all. Just buried, victims silenced, and the whole issue conveniently forgotten. In addition to the valid things that have been mentioned thus far, I'd like to add a few more: Collective Amnesia Regarding Violence by Women Message to "Gender" Ideologues Lest I be accused of misogyny (I will be anyway, but oh well, I'm used to tha…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:23 AM
11

Sorry, but that's a stupid, brain-dead survey. Probably not of your making, I realize. Shows bias (loads of bias) in its questions, or is trolling for a particular POV. It's more a caricature than a study, or perhaps it's designed for caricatures to be the ones to fill it out. INVITES TROLLING. You'll learn exactly nothing relevant from it. It has about as much nuance as getting hit by a Mack truck. The only options are the equivalent of 'all feminist positions are the rights ones' or 'I'm a stu…
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/22 10:03 PM
1

There's a very interesting (and troubling) thread over on r/raisedbynarcissists/ atm, talking about mothers possibly poisoning their children/spouses. Shocking to read just how many commenters have experienced similar things.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:41 PM
1

^This^ is a perfect response. Absolutely spot on. Well done u/ReWildingOfMen OP - The only thing I would add to it is a suggestion to research the term "Victim Selection", and figure out how that applies to you. Once you've developed enough skills to no longer be a 'good target' your healing will be well on its way and your life will never be as difficult again.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:18 PM
12

Your first statement is completely true. Your second statement, however, is completely false. I speak as one of those victims who seemingly doesn't exist in public policy, law enforcement or social service training, and is completely invisible in any and all services for victims. We don't 'belong' in services for men, and are sometimes (not often, but often enough) treated as if we get special or better treatment, as in your comment here. We're literally 'the enemy' to any organizations who prov…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:33 PM
3

Yes. But you're not allowed to talk about it. Ever. The level of threat towards anyone who even dares to is hard to believe - but deadly serious.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:45 PM
13

Also not a lawyer, but I recently saw something posted on another forum that I believe applies here. Not sure if it was r/ProtectAndServe or r/Law Basically, it was something along the lines of "A law that no-one will prosecute is not a law." Lots (and lots) of laws on the books that by rights should apply to every single Canadian, of every vintage, make and model. But that doesn't mean they are. Not only do we have clearly unfair laws on the books that discriminate against, or for, particular g…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:54 AM
5

To any and all women, you will always be the villain. Most women I know, myself included, would think he's a decent guy and stand behind him. We're not as easy to spot, perhaps, standing behind the noisy aggrieved ones making all the noise. Same thing in reverse, from what I can tell. I don't know what circles you run in, but I suggest you look for a better set of friends.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:16 AM
2

God help that child.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:07 AM
5

You're a nice guy. That's why she's going after you like this, but won't stand behind anything that would provide some certainty. That child will need all the help it can get and if she's doing this now she'll continue the games even more after the child is born. If she won't consent to a paternity test, reasonable people will view you as a sane person. Anyone else, well you've just learned something about them. That's actually good information to know. You've expressed discomfort with the idea …
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:03 AM
3

I wish you both luck - and good on you that you've called this out. And both of you for recognizing your own issues. I can tell you for a fact that, if you're both willing to work on things and learn to be kinder to one another, you can grow your marriage into something healthy and mutually supportive. My husband and I have been going through horrendous things over the last year - and our relationship is the one thing that's kept us going through it. Our marriage becomes stronger with every adve…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:17 PM
2

It sounds like there are some pretty big issues that need to be resolved in your relationship. Feeling reluctant to share things with her is a pretty big red flag. Either she's only pretending to be supportive (which tbh, sounds like it might be the case here), or she is trying to be supportive but there are unresolved conflicts elsewhere that need to be dealt with and her anger is leaking out. Or, even worse, she is being influenced (read brainwashed) in a way that's harming your relationship (…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:40 PM
2

I'm not so much a proponent of men's rights, as I am a proponent of fundamental human rights - every human: men, women, children, seniors, the able-bodied, the disabled, all races, all blood types, etc.... (That last one was a joke, btw...) I am very sympathetic towards and understand the necessity for the men's rights movement, especially these days, but am in limited support of it (and any other 'group rights' movement) in principle. For me, it's a case of 'two wrongs don't make a right', and …
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:20 PM
2

I think that's excellent advice - for both men and women. Decent people of either sex will be horrified by what they see there - men for how vulnerable they are, and women for what the immoral phalanx of enablers are doing in their name. No decent woman wants this either, but their voices get drowned out by those with vested interests. People jump into relationships and marriage with zero preparation: with no skills or information to enable them to properly choose partners or sustain relationshi…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:38 PM
1

\<sup>This\</sup>^
/r/MensRights21/08/22 07:45 PM
3

Re: "violent criminal men" Sorry, but I don't believe single motherhood or even fatherlessness have much if anything to do with it. Sure, having only one parent with not enough time to parent - particularly if there are no positive extended family around - leaves a child with deficits, which can cause all kinds of harm to their life trajectory. And that does leave a child more vulnerable to predation and corruption by outsiders. That's true regardless of whether that single parent is a mother or…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:27 AM
7

"Feminists do not manipulate the system to benefit women. They manipulate the system to benefit themselves and further the objectives of feminism." ^This^
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 07:41 PM
3

This makes no sense at all. Has anyone seen any proof that this isn't just a stunt by the mods to gain some infamy? There is no way, if this was truly a pro-radical feminist sub, that reddit would put something like that on their page. If this was an anti-rad feminist sub, as a couple ppl on here are saying, it might make more sense, but I can't see why the mods would want to draw undue attention to themselves. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:25 AM
14

I second the thanks to the mods. Glad to see this sub is still standing.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 08:32 PM
3

Whatever on earth made you think this was about rape victims, or victims of any sort? If it were truly about victims - female or male - there would be no movement to deny other victim groups. This is about using victims. This is about power.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 10:24 PM
1

I think this can partly be traced back to the idea that, in general, harmful acts considered typically male are criminalized, but many (perhaps most) harmful acts considered typically female are not - regardless of the amount of harm involved for the victim. Another way of looking at it is, harmful acts by men are covered by the criminal code, which is viewed as harm against society at large and therefore prosecuted by the state, but most harmful acts by females are defined as civil, meaning the…
/r/MensRights23/06/20 10:04 PM
2

I don't mean to pull this thread off-topic, but I wanted to thank you for your comment, especially your last paragraph re: Booleanism. (Yes, spellcheck has informed me I've just made up that word.) Feminists always decry the Boolean Madonna/wh*re view of women, but that just felt incomplete whenever I heard it. You've just articulated the masculine version of that, and I can't believe I never recognized that before, nor have ever heard it talked about so explicitly. I've heard versions of this b…
/r/MensRights19/06/20 06:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter