TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Level_Up_IT Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by Level_Up_IT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

you are not some bronze age potentate ...and you never will be, with that attitude!
/r/seduction17/10/24 01:18 PM
1

Same. I can't manage that many without a spreadsheet and a cram session before each date. Otherwise I will mess up their stories. Asking what her parents do when she previously told you her parents are dead is a bit of a faux pas. We tend to want to be greedy, options = opportunities for success, but OP has got to trim that number down.
/r/seduction17/10/24 01:14 PM
1

They exist on caveat emptor and right to free association. The only way to fix the situation is to stop paying them.
/r/seduction15/10/24 06:19 AM
1

I'd say avoid. You're still performing for the shit test.
/r/seduction15/10/24 06:16 AM
6

Me, I don't care about figuring that out. This is a good mindset. It's your job to present the product, it's her job to figure out if it's good for her.
/r/seduction14/10/24 09:57 AM
1

100% We don't have to be in the bucket of crabs if we don't want to be. Live approach puts you above the top message in her inbox, and as a bonus, you get an instant decision. No anxiety over response times on messages. You know then and no time is wasted. Time is the most precious resource.
/r/seduction14/10/24 09:56 AM
1

Ask her the time, or where <nearby place> is. Say thank you and walk away. Repeat until you realize that beauty is an illusion.
/r/seduction14/10/24 09:55 AM

Shit testing is an IOI. Even if her interest levels are low, it's still an IOI and can be used to your advantage. You pass a shit test by ignoring it or by turning it on them (hoop theory). You fail a shit test by acknowledging it as a shit test or actually complying.
/r/seduction14/10/24 09:39 AM
5

I think this Chad Harem fantasy is mostly a myth. Most women are pretty celibate in western society and holding out on sex. Agreed with /u/nordik1 , highly underrated comment. The Chad Harem thing is a myth but there are harems of second and third tier men; I know because I recently found myself in one (and immediately left once I found out, of course). She needs seven dinners a week, and you might be part of the dinner rotation that never gets to hit it... where she behaves like an OG courtesan…
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:32 AM
2

Do not put exclusivity on the table before you're officially dating What is the difference between exclusivity and officially dating? I agree though... exclusivity is not for sale until sex happens. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of commitment.
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:28 AM
7

I say this as someone that's been with over 70 women and the last two years have been the hardest it's EVER been. Same. I've been in the game since the 90s, have put up good numbers over the years, and thanks to the swipe apps I'm competing with every dude on the planet. I used to only have to compete with every guy in a 10 mile radius.
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:24 AM
5

It's a lot like unionizing. If the workers (men) actually stopped going to the factory and no scab workers (simp men giving likes and gifts) were crossing the picket lines, things could normalize. But that won't happen.
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:21 AM
6

This is why I say Dubai is a red flag. You're competing with a dude that bought her a trip before, and now the expectation is you buy her a trip. Dinners aren't enough, dinners are just how you keep her warm until you buy her a trip.
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:19 AM
12

Specifically, it was Tinder (before acquisition by Match Group) introducing swipe-based dating. Non-exhaustive list of issues: Old school POF and OKC had a true 50/50 ratio, and they worked well, but we don't want a happy population, do we? /s The presentation of candidates to a user is driven by hidden algorithms that are written to maximize profit, not user experience. Loss of data ownership means (mainly for women) that their pictures are copied onto unmanned profiles in other cities to give …
/r/seduction14/10/24 06:16 AM

It isn't feminism, it's that social media and swipe-based dating apps (driven by corporate algorithms) are the problem. Dating apps were amazing before Tinder arrived - there was a legit 50/50 ratio on old school POF and OKC. Everyone behaved normally. Now it's just too mechanized and the human brain cannot cope.
/r/seduction13/10/24 06:59 AM
60

This. Social circle game is king. It takes the longest amount of time to cultivate but it absolutely produces the highest quality results.
/r/seduction13/10/24 06:56 AM
1

Condoms Discretion - any questions about who else you're seeing should be met with "a gentleman never tells" and nothing (nothing) from any date should end up on your socials where the other women can see it.
/r/seduction12/10/24 06:29 AM
1

In these questions, I ask myself the following question: If I was Ryan Reynolds, would she still be behaving the same way? If the answer to this question is "no", then you need to move on.
/r/seduction09/10/24 07:21 AM
3

who knows the other person says something F'up in the first minute 100% Real life example: I was out with a smokeshow recently and in a Japanese restaurant she did the Asian eyes thing (where one pulls the sides of their eyelids). In public. In an Asian restaurant. I wish I had been filming because the blood must have left my face. I was mortified.
/r/seduction02/10/24 09:13 AM
3

"Tell a funny joke just to get some play, then you try and a move and she says 'no way'" - Young MC
/r/seduction01/10/24 09:09 AM
2

If it looks forced, it will backfire. Always... they can smell bullshit a mile away.
/r/seduction30/09/24 09:24 AM
1

I'm going to try this. I've got someone right now who might be the worst texter of all time (even our mutual friends complain about her texting) but she's good on actual dates. That tendency renders text useless as a rapport-building tool in between dates... maybe a video will induce a behavior change.
/r/seduction29/09/24 09:35 AM
1

I can't see all of those but there is a god tier emoji - the double eyes. Nobody knows wtf it means LOL
/r/seduction29/09/24 09:29 AM
1

Thank you for this. I needed to hear this today.
/r/seduction29/09/24 09:27 AM
1

Someone explain this one: "Long term, open to short" selected Bio: "No hookups" If short != hookup, what does it mean? 3-10 dates with no sex over several weeks? F that noise.
/r/seduction29/09/24 09:27 AM
2

Nothing wrong in the post, just want to add: Shit tests are an IOI Acknowledging the shit test and/or complying with the shit test = failing the shit test Usually the best course of action is to ignore the shit test If it can't be ignored, hopefully you can apply hoop theory
/r/seduction29/09/24 09:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter