TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lexers624 Archive

View 0 posts and 175 comments by Lexers624 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Simone de Beauvoir was the lead figure of the so-called "second wave feminism". She also practically created modern leftism, and with John Money, created the "gender is different from sex" radical ideology. She's also responsible for having created the leftist OCD of constantly relabeling and redefining age old words and concept, and to rewrite history to steal the credit for past event, for example, the "second wave feminists" stealing the suffragettes exploits. She's also famous for saying tha…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 05:28 AM
1

The actual improvement to their life quality was the consequence of the general quality of life improvement at that time. If anything, feminism hampered that improvement. Feminism aims at attacking men. Feminism doesn't care about women, or maybe only in the way of using women as tools to hurt men. If you disagree with it, you either never read anything about Simone de Beauvoir, or you're flat out paid to belch a narrative.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:47 AM
1

No it didnt.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:24 AM
1

Its factual, not sarcastic.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:23 AM
1

Religion. Nothing else. Absofuckinglutely nothing else.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:58 AM
3

It affects women negatively as it makes them lose a large chunk of illicit power they have over men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:55 AM
4

You can't. Best you can do is get competent legal representation, do some damage control, watch your savings getting siphonned away, and despair.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 08:46 AM
1

To some point, I agree with your second part. However, the fact it exists doesn't mean we have to agree with it.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:43 PM
1

She's stealing away opportunities from better students than her, taking advantage of a broken system she knows to be broken and purposely keep in a broken way.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 02:06 PM
0

How? It's clearly both their faults, though mostly hers. Again, it's like purposefully filling the wrong checkboxes on your tax repport, cashing the cheque, to then blame the IRS data technicians, saying you got a refund you shouldn't have, saying they should have dug deeper on your case.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 12:46 PM
0

Where do you think those opportinities come from? What pays for them? Why did she get those opportunities, and not the tons of smarter, wiser and better students (who likely worked their @$$ off hoping for such opportunities) around her, whom are the intended recipient for such opportunities? How about taking into account she ends up heavily penalizing students around her? (Like if you cashed in some cheque you knew all too well was intended to someone else.) You know it sums up as the same, onc…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:38 PM
6

I didn't invent money embezzlement. But I'm not taking advantage of it. Your point?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:12 AM
5

We'd need a ton more background to judge. Solely from what you told, both are equally likely.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:11 AM
2

You're dreaming.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:17 PM
2

If women don't owe us sex, then we don't owe them: protection incessant on-the-spot IT tech support help in class (they keep saying girls outperform us in academic, well...) extra arms when they need heavy lifting money! (be serious, how many girls constantly bum for money? "do you have $100 until my next paycheck clears?" what the paid/unpaid ratio for those interrest free loans?) etc... In other words, and I've been saying so for a decade now, cut your ties with your females "friends", unless …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 09:16 PM
1

Most men simply can't. That's why tons of cases end up on a plea deal, as the man doesn't have the resources to properly fight the case. I'm Canadian, and most men get on the verge of bankrupcy following such. And the Crown knws it, and that's why they used the Crusher a lot.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:43 PM
2

I don't disagree. I worked as a paralegal; the law has been broken for decades, and crooks simply try to hide it and virtue signal.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 12:26 PM
1

Semantics.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:26 PM
0

Even the harshest pro-life bans have clause protecting expecting mother from life threatening pregnancies.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:03 PM
1

^^^Yet another shill paid to post all day in support of feminists.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:01 PM
0

That's a flat out lie. She died of malpractice and that hospital is ranked as the worst in the whole USA. The whole "The doctor were affraid" is a PP revisionist claim.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:59 PM
0

NONE died from the abortion ban. Absolutely not a single confirmed death. IIRC one died from back alley infanticie, and at least two OD'ed on mail-in infanticide drug, and lately one died of medical malpractice in the worst hospital of the whole 50 states. But NONE died of having been denied an infanticide.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:57 PM
1

Because you lie and play pretend that you only seek justice
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:54 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1gmekcm/comment/lw7naq3/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:53 PM
0

There isn't a single confirmed death from an infanticide ban. Zero. None. Nada.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:52 PM
2

They are not opting out. It's Smoke and mirror. 4B started in South Koera. And nowadays South Koreans 304's still band Chads, they never stopped, and all it does it further punish Average Joes and other Sub-8.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:43 PM
3

... and the South Korean 304's are notorious for still banging Chads left and right while quoting 4B whenever a Sub-8 shows up.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:41 PM
2

You are a shill paid to spread feminist disinformation.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:35 PM
37

The solutions: - Banning infanticide; - Drafting women; - Drafting young liberal women first. They want to be equal? Well, there's some equality to catch up.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:27 PM
5

Putin is a cold pragmatist. Bidden is senile, and Harris' a goof, so Putin had no opposition from the US and their lackeys. Now that Trump is in office (soon...), Putin knows he's in for serious trouble if he goes off the gardrail. So there's going to be some negotiations over Ukraine peace treaty, but that's it. We're more likely to see a major conflict in East Affrica once the various tribes unite and launch a major scorching earth attack on the shipping lanes in that area as retaliation for t…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:24 PM
16

Spot on. But I'm old and disabled. I'll pep talk you all you want but there's literally nothing else I can do.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:20 PM
26

He elaborated in another response. Groso modo, based on his Internet search history, he was suspected of possessing child p*rn*graphy, which means the prosecution's narritive likely was that the girl wasn't consenting. And with poor representation, that's a very likely outcome.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:15 PM
2

Depends on your jurisdiction. Canada here. The reason why we have so little civil litigation per capita is because a trial normally costs $50k to $250k CAD, and one barely gets anything if successful, to the point barely any sucessful cases breaks even. Here, civil litigation is meant to further punish the culprit, and *NOT* to compensate for the harm done. A landmark case was Ward v. Q, where Ward was awarded $600 (no zero missing) while having incured well over $30k for a wrongful arrest, havi…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:05 PM
23

I think that's where the money is. You case shifts from two consenting people to a non-consensual thing. You need to fight this in court.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:56 PM
23

I'm pretty sure AoC is 15 if not 14 in most of Europe. If not, I'm positive most have R&J clauses. So I'm pretty sure we're missing something here.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:53 PM
4

I don't know where you are on the globe, but in most jurisdiction you should have been covered by a Romeo&Juliette clause, assuming she wasn't already above AoC. So I have a feeling there's some crucial piece of information you're not telling.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:51 PM
2

Even worse: only sex crime units work on the unofficial assumption that all online sex offenders are male. Which is why you never hear about women getting caught for those.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:59 PM
1

I dispute those. Yeah, you belch numbers, but I'm a former paralegal, I briefly worked in a prison and I volunteered in an excon resources providing therapies and support to sexual offender, and: 1 - whenever some feminist organisation (the Aussie government qualify as such) talks about sexual assault, it uses a melting pot of anything and everything ranging from persistant stares to street catcall to workplace environment fail attempts at dating to etc... before finally getting to the point of …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:52 PM
1

The Tolerant terrorist movement was born in the US, but took over France and the UK.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:36 PM
0

It's not "your" body, it's another human being's body. If you have no morals and can grasp that, and that you deny science and basic biology, I'm sorry, but you are the problem.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:35 PM
2

You'd get away without a doubt. But if you sexswap the roles, with a male character saying the exact same thing about females, you'd be swatted within a week.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:34 PM
1

similar story happenned to me when I was 13. But it was things I had to do under blackmail. And I was suspended from school but didn't have to appologize. The juvenile police knew, but instead of cracking on the girls, they left an entry in my Big Brother file, and I recently found out about it, nearly 30 years later.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:13 PM
3

It's smoke and mirror. The 304's will make lots of noise about that, but they'll keep banging random Chads, while screaming 4B at Sub-8 and Average-Joes.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:59 PM
2

It's a leftist hate mongering disinformation campaign, aiming to increase pro-abort violence.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:57 PM
2

So you're okay with murdering political opponents in cold blood solely because of their political affiliation, like a true leftist!
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:55 PM
3

Infanticide isn't a right, it never was, and won't ever be.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:54 PM
0

No, you are.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:53 PM
0

That's litterally death threats, and should be treated accordingly.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:52 PM
2

Pay gap is a conspiracy theory that was debunked in the 90's.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:18 PM
2

The bias is anti-men, and such bias is hardcoded in the AI.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:17 PM
3

Who's paying you to be this disingenous and showing this much bad faith?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:13 PM
1

Consider yourself lucky then.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:11 PM
3

Feminism is a sugarcoated way of calling misandry and gynecocentrism. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:09 PM
2

Seen it, been there. It's called "being used as a kleenex" or "being used an emotional tampon" or "being a kleenex box holder". Happenned to me more than I can count. The rule of thumb is to hang up on those unless you're having sex with them.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:08 PM
1

You should have called the cops on her. That's a crime/felony pretty much everywhere in the West.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:05 PM
2

(I'm mid 40's) Every. Single. Time. Since early teenage. And I was S.A.'ed at 13 by female classmates. We always get shammed/ridiculed by women for doing that. Both in real life and online. And we don't "feel" we're being shamed and ridiculed, we objectively are.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:03 PM
0

That's exactly what a bot would repply.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:14 PM
1

We'd be living in a much better society.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:32 PM
0

1 - Feminists happiness comes from hurting men. So there are no scenario in which both can be happy at once. 2 - Feminism is a plague that seeks at making wealthy feminists wealthier but doctoring data and manipulating gullible masses. Saying it doesn't exist would be topmost denial. The only two type of feminism are candid (the rabid toxic radfems) and the manipulative (feminists that pretend feminism only seeks justice). 3 - Depends on the content of the post, but I believe feminism should be …
/r/MensRights17/10/24 03:29 PM
16

No. Governments are profoundly misandrist. MSM is profoundly misandrist. Western corrupt judiciary is profoundly misandrist. And the list goes on and on... Feminists and their direct lackeys of course take the cake when it comes to misandry, but that's not something that's exclusive to them.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 02:08 PM
1

No... Men are suffering and women are the ones causing the suffering. We need to take resources allocated to women/feminism and use them for the betterment of men.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:03 AM
3

Men are the ones who need help.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:30 PM
3

A lot of YouTubers are great for providing studies and data. For example: https://youtu.be/tplbLNCI2HI?si=WDyGfzRUjcvmSGrc
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:27 PM
1

They make society worse as a whole. The economy is a collateral victim.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:19 PM
2

What will piss you off is when you'll notice that those tax dollars forcefully come out of your paycheck through a gimmick called income tax. So when that dimwit Kamala said she can't think of a single law that infringes men bodily autonomy, income tax does. Because if we don't pay tribute to our feminist oppressors, we go straight to jail. So you, and and the first dude you see when doing your groceries, we're all paying for the paranoid entitled brats who keep screaming how the world is suppos…
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:02 PM
28

Because feminism is a powerful lobby that gets billions in taxpayer money yearly. So they "invest" in trollfarms and paid activism.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 02:26 PM
3

Welcome to Canada.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 11:54 AM
1

No idea. Wasn't it hostilely sold?
/r/MensRights10/10/24 11:50 AM
0

Entirely bogus. It relies heavily on self reported incidents and the the "believe all women" BS. However, according to yearly FBI studies, 95 to 97.5% of all female complainants of heterosexual s*xual ab*se lie.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 11:48 AM
3

A good example for your first paragraph was the Barbie and Ken serial killers: Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo. Homolka was the mastermind. Yet, she always was treated as a victim. She spent a few years (3, if memory serves) in a medium security facility before being sent to a minimum security one. All along, she worked at the facilities' daycare units... yet, she was convicted for sexually ab*sing children. She received extraordinary transfers, so that neither the public nor the press knew wher…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:42 PM
-2

Well, I'm Canadian, and it's a fairly unfair assessment. Canada had been heading towards that dumpster for quite a while when Trudeau took power. Harper gutted public finances and cumulated historic deficits, while only appointing his croonies to important office. Trudeau eventually took power, and replaced Harper croonies by his croonies, but the point is that the problem is Canada, Trudeau otherwise merely being a symptom of the problem. Also, you're clearly a conservative paid shill, or you h…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:27 PM
4

Former prison worker here. There was wwaaayy worst than that a few years back in Canada. There was a serial killer who had killed prostitutes. He had been sentenced to life/25 but was paroled after 15 for day sorties to spend time with prostitutes. He likely was a snitch, but it was never confirmed. After a year, he grew back to his old habits, and started beating the girls bad. Police complaints, but all he got was getting scolded by his parole agent. He eventually choked one to death, was arre…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:23 PM
2

Everything slightly political on Wikipedia is locked so that only its inhouse psyop clique can edit it. And they only edit according to what they're paid to. Keep in mind most (if not all) top editors on Wikipedia are shills paid by some lobby or another. Wikipedia was pretty much candid about it, a few years ago. There's nothing wrong with (for example) a paid LGBT activist editing and gatekeeping some articles, but conservative lobbies IP are already recorded, and they're only allowed to make …
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:16 PM
0

MRA (men's right activist) is described as online terrorism by various online law enforcement agencies like the politburo FBI. Masculinist is often treated as a slur and using that word likely will have your post muted/shadow banned by several social media. As will whatever term that will replace it.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 04:10 PM
8

The more reasons to be very vocal for not voting for her, discouraging people from voting for her, and steering voters to "the other guy".
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:09 AM
1

Internet, no, but the powers that be that are lackeys to feminism do.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 09:33 PM
2

IF men would stop paying taxes all over the west: * You'd only need 10% of current working men to go on a 48-72 hours strike to instantly bankrupt a country. Obama's government shutdown was over a much lesser fiancial issue. * The government would try to crack down in the first few hours, but would grow desperate after the first day. * After a full 48-72 hours, the governments would be on their knees, and men would be able to dictate their terms. "No taxation without representation!" Rings a bel…
/r/MensRights07/10/24 07:47 PM
1

As Whatever says it, feminism is a pick and choose buffet. They pick whatever benefits them, and discard anything what doesn't.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 07:42 PM
0

You got #2 backways. It's totally accepted for men to talk about their feelings. But those will be weaponized against him. However, what's innapropriate is to weaponize anything against women.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 07:40 PM
2

I was blackmailed and S.A.'ed by two female classmates when I was 13. They had been ran through by some Chad, and decided they wanted revenge on boys. They lacked the balls to attack their Chad, so I ended up on the receiving end. Juvenile police knew in the the following hours, but decided not to act, to instead put my name on some watch list, as male victims often turn out to become sex ofenders when they become adults.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 06:34 PM
1

There's no such right. Period.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:11 AM
1

That's a GOOD thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:10 AM
1

That's a big pile of feminist lies. The very fact women always had a longer life expectancy than men disproves every single word you lined up in that editorial. Women have always been pampered and privileged vs their contemporary male equivalent.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 08:07 AM
3

That freak has a degree in gender studies, she's working for some gender study group... https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/search/authors/view?givenName=Emily&familyName=Dutton&affiliation=University%20of%20Alberta&country=CA&authorName=Dutton%2C%20Emily In other word, she's not a scientist in any way, and she's just a paid mouthpiece on social welfare.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:46 AM
2

That's purposefully made up data. I used to work in a call centers in my late teens. At the end of the day, if we hadn't met our quotas or if our stats were bad, we'd grab our cellphone, call the automated central to make "hang up calls" to rectify our stats. How many of those 3k reports are bots duplicating the same report? How many of those 3k reports are fabrications? Here in Canada, Feminist grew full Dragon Ball Z with their made up data: they now pretend one female Canadian out of 3 is s.a…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:29 AM
1

There are numerous stats that instead prove that the overwhelming majority of male who were victim of sexual abuse will become sexual offenders, out of never having developed healthy moral compass.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:18 AM
1

Just enjoy the show. I'm old. Most of my relative are dead by now. Sit back and watch the world burn around you. Enjoy the show.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:16 AM
1

BS. Women have always outlived men out of being severely pampered and privileged. The cause hasn't changed, so the outcome won't change.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:15 AM
7

Because the governments control the press and the feminists control the government. "From God, to Kane, to Seth." From feminists, to spineless gutless officials, to the obedient meat puppets of the press.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:13 AM
1

You're not posting for a "she", you're posting for a paycheck.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:10 AM
1

You can't reason with that thing. It's paid per post to bully his boss' views into other users.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:09 AM
1

You're not a man, you're a paid shills working for some pro-abort troll farm, paid to disseminate whatever your boss tell you to disseminate. Here, you're trolling trying to make it look like you're grassroot. You're not a man. For all we know, you could be a chimp rolling dice with an AI powered camera generating text according to your rolls and screams. But you're not a man.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 09:08 AM
1

First off, pregnancy is a safe and routine condition. It's less risky than driving your car to your grocery store. So there's no justification for using "the risks of pregnancy" as an excuse for such double standard. And if it's as risky as feminist shills are paid to pretend it is, then why women all raw dog to begin with? Second, you are halfway home when you say women are never accountable in any way while men are 100% of the time.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:58 AM
1

I didn't mean it in a misandrist way.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 04:03 AM
1

Men are the oppressed, women are the oppressors.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 01:22 AM
2

France banned paternity test, and made it a criminal offense to try to get one. So paternity fraud is arguably the norm.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 01:15 AM
1

That's actually yesterday's news. It hit North American MRA's in Summer 2023, and it did result in some people having the FBI SWAT over for trivial posts like "let's pray for a better world!"
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:42 AM
5

"You're just victim bashing!" and point out what would happens if you genderswapped the story.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:40 AM
7

Because corrupt governments control the press and the feminist control the governments. So feminists give an order, the spineless government rubberstamps and relays the order, and the press complies.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:38 AM
8

No they didn't. They did receive some harsh comments, but all women, even the seriously unattractive ones, had a fair shot at getting laid/marrying a man of some description. Nowadays, men have the comment, and are totally deprived of a female companionship.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:35 AM
2

A formatting issue, the first item on the list (conscription( doesn't have a bullet.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:33 AM
5

Regarding the various courts you mentioned, I'm not sure which jurisdiction you're from, but I would rather have talked about the right of due process before an unbiased and unprejudiced court, and the right to bring grievances before a competent court, and have the matter tried fairly. All jurisdictions I've read about have both of such rights, except they can be phrased differently.
/r/MensRights15/09/24 12:31 AM
2

Some people people have some bizarre misconceptions about rights. (My 2¢: feminist are behind that misinformation campaign.) Rights only means a government must not deprive you access to it. For example, the right to freedom forbids the government to jail people at random, the right to life forbids pitting random hobos in a colosseum, the right against self incrimination forbid the government to use self incrimination in courts, the right to a lawyer forbids the government's agents for depriving…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 09:14 AM
1

Most men want kids, the main exception being the Chads (and similar self-centered hedonists). But most men want a Mini-Me of some description.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:43 PM
0

No kidding...
/r/MensRights12/09/24 11:43 AM
-5

Sex is literally a physiological need.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 08:27 AM
-2

You're not here in good faith, and you're just here to be toxic and disruptive.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 08:25 AM
1

Homophobic shill
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:40 AM
4

You're literally dealing with an Indian working for a feminist trollfarm who's paid to be toxic and disruptive.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:38 AM
5

Simply put: feminists and leftists can arson, loot, murder and vandalize and the press is still ordered to paint it as a "peaceful protest" and to inflate the number of people involved. men routinely have cops called on them for much lesser than that.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:31 AM
3

1 You only do so in a patronizing way, to belittle men for not being feminist slaves. 2 You never ever heard of a communication technique in which you address first the arguments you know very well your opponents will be using next? It's fairly common, and I'm surprised you didn't learn it in your Debate Club. Then again, I already told you my opinion of debate clubs. 3 You know I have something called "life experience". I'm now positive I'm twice your age. And there's a world between saying wom…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:21 AM
2

In a specific MMO I play, we have a US Navy veteran who served in both Iraq wars. He told us some behind the scene things the press was forbidden to talk about. Like weeks before deployment, a large number of "women marines" got pregnant and opted out. It caused some last minute headaches to get replacements. He said that was just like WWII era when recruit would shoot themselves in a foot in order to doge a deployment. So, yeah, women will graduate all those ... to then purposefully get pregnan…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:52 AM
5

IIRC abortion was a $8B industry in the US alone. That's why PP can afford to have trollfarms working around the clock.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 05:44 AM
3

Indian trollfarm shills clocking in for work! How surprising!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:12 AM
2

Indian trollfarm shills clocking in for work! How surprising!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:11 AM
2

Indian trollfarm shills clocking in for work! How surprising!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:11 AM
5

Indian trollfarm shills clocking in for work! How surprising!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:10 AM
2

Indian trollfarm shills clocking in for work! How surprising!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:09 AM
2

I'm fed up with your constant attacks and stuff. You've been acting entitled and condescending, yet you make gratuitous claims like me defending a dude I never met. You are a feminist, and you'd even blame a traffic light for turning red on you out of the m word.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:57 AM
1

Shill, didn't you just say you would stop engaging with me?
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:51 AM
2

Again, you're condescending, and you are dead-set on meta arguing about anything that hurts your victim narrative. How old are you? I'm starting to think you're 16 or 17!
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:46 AM
3

You'll never be a man, you'll never experience sexlessness, you'll never experience "positive" discrimination locking you from getting decent jobs. Yet it's not stopping you from weighting in on that.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:28 AM
2

So you can exercise mental cruelty about male sexlessness and male loneliness but we can't even mention PMS as a biological equivalent to being sex starved. Got it. You can attack under the belt but we can't respond. Got it. Typical feminist.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:19 AM
2

First paragraph: you're projecting. Second: you didn't say it, I proactively brought that up as it's a common line feminists use. Third: I didn't sexualize you!!! But that's something you women do. Fourth: More personal attacks. Remember when you were the one accusing me? Fifth: Again, you're condescending. You came to troll, be disruptive, and maybe "make us see the error in our ways". You never listened, you argued about anything and everything. "Strengthened your desire"? I don't think it's p…
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:16 AM
1

the actual risks are in the waters of 1 in every couple thousand pregnancies. That's why we strive as a species. You're right about the inconveniences caused by pregnancies, but its unpleasantness doesn't make it "risky".
/r/MensRights12/09/24 02:09 AM
3

Pregnancies are incredibly safe and routine, especially with contemporary medical facilities. You put yourself hellalot more in harm's way by driving. The whole idea that pregnancies are risky come from feminist disinformation.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 01:28 AM
2

Sorry, the intermediary post were all collapsed when I read yours, so I didn't see you were talking about the source in the guy's post and not in the OP. So my whole comment was off topic. As for "unbiased", feminist belched content, or content curated by feminists and produced by feminist funded/operated entities is deemed "unbiased" by the media and feminists, but it's the very definition of biased and prejudiced. Of course men can do bad thing. That's why you women pick them in the first plac…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 10:39 PM
2

5'9 is roughly the average for men. So you'd still have access to half the male population. Not bad is it? Yes, women don't do the deed with sub-8 men unless he has a MAJOR trump card to offset his physique. Like wealth, standing/status. That's just the way it is and your constant lies about the opposite won't change the truth about it. As for pictures, we see it everyday. AI generated picture, or picture with a coworker or anything... You shills constantly come up with new ideas and we always d…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 10:26 PM
2

Only a fringe minority of men leave the family on their on. And that's the woman's fault, as she had an ocean of men to chose from, yet she picked the good looking Chad. However, what's more common is that the woman is a brat, she pushed the man away, and then she whines saying "The dirtbag left me for no reason!"
/r/MensRights11/09/24 10:09 PM
2

You're mixing water and oil here. Not every single problem is caused by women but almost every problems in the West in the last 40 years was caused by feminism, or its overreach, or is a consequence of feminism, like the domino effect of DEI hires. Like Boeing planes falling off the skies because Boeing fired all white males to only have incompetent DEI hires. Don't believe me? Tune in on the US Senate grilling of Boeing board. Forbes does a great job of showing the whole hearings on YouTube, wi…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 09:35 PM
2

The Source is https://www.acf.hhs.gov/ though the site is very old (almost 20 years) and all the links are broken. You'll have to manually search for each and every documents. The source is an official US agency, the Administration for Children and Families I don't quite understand what you mean when you say you need a subscription, neither the site nor the source require one. I'd like to point out that, again, the site is almost 20 years old, and the quoted ACF data was roughly the same back in…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 08:34 PM
2

PMS: women going berserk due to hormone spike. Sexlessness: males going berserk due to hormone spike. Yet you deny the equivalence. As for the freak, I'm confident saying the flesh and blood Indian behind that fake account has 20+ similar fake profiles he/she is paid to troll with. Whatever that freak said was solely meant to be offensive and to disrupt the thread. As for feminists protecting female child predators, yes, they do. A good Canadian example was serial killer Karla Homolka. She was t…
/r/MensRights11/09/24 05:30 PM
4

Regarding that first paragraph of feminist propaganda: Best way to debunk it is to show that lesbian couples are the scenario in which domestic violence is the most prevalent. It's rampant! We agree about your 2nd paragraph. Feminism is by NO WAY about equality, it's about power and dominance. Feminists will hurt women without a qualm, if in the process they end up hurting men more. Best example is when I went back to school a few years ago. Feminists hijacked the student union and renegotiated …
/r/MensRights11/09/24 04:14 PM
2

They simply can't.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:11 PM
2

"Here's my fictitious unsubstantiated and unfalsifiable outlying personal story that you must believe is 100% accurate even if it's flat out unbelievable." Either you're hiding something major, like your FWB was a millionaire or was a celeb, or you're making it up on the spot to hide the fact you can't debate.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:09 PM
6

They literally don't. Women get far more from the government than waht they contribute. Then companies get more from the government than what they contribute. Only men receive far less than what they contribute.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:06 PM
2

Trick is, she was complaining about "being lonely", and when I debunked that, a pair of Indian paid shills barged in to ad hominem and wreck the thread. Women can't be lonely, just like morbidly overweight people can't be starving.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:27 PM
2

There's also the "soulless rape" effect. (That terms comes from a woke religious sect according to which a male baby born from an intercourse in which the woman didn't climax will be a soulless creature.) A "soulless rape" is any consensual intercourse in which the girl ended up "dissatisfied". Feminists started a campaign to entice women to report those as rape as, according to Simone de Beauvoir consent is impossible and all form of heterosexual intercourse is flat out rape. So it tricks women…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:28 AM
-1

यार, तुम क्रैक या फेंटेनाइल के नशे में हो।
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:10 AM
1

1, No. It shows I know you have a vested interest into posting specific things No, you're Indian. Now that's ad hominem.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:58 AM
-1

No, you're a "3 am reviewer", a.k.a. an India based trollfarm operator, paid to post things in favour of this or that.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:55 AM
7

You factually can't. So either you erroneously believe something to be extreme loneliness, or you're writing fantasy as we speak.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:47 AM
-1

You're an Indian posting nonsense in English. Maybe it made sense in your mind in Hindi, but it didn't in English.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:45 AM
1

Another paid Indian paid to shill for a "cause". Typical.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:44 AM
6

It is. I'm unsure whether you're in denial or flat out making things up. But it is. For women, at least.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:43 AM
0

Shill, what does it have to do with anything here? If not, just type in Indian or your local Indian dialect and let Google Translate translate it for you.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:29 AM
4

How's the weather at your Indian trollfarm? Are you paid 20¢/post too?
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:24 AM
5

Because you can turn on a dating app and have a man (or woman) of some description show up at your door in a hour or less. You can flirt at your job. You can flirt on mass transit. You can flirt [name any place]. At worst, you'll be declined. As for men? Unless being topmost handsome we get fired if we flirt at a job, we get arrested and get a stitch video if we flirt on mass transit, most men get less than 1 like/month on dating apps and a lot won't ever get a single match on a dating app. You …
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:21 AM
-1

Yes. They're paid about 20¢/post, but they're being replaced by AI powered machines doing just that. Long story short, they realized around 2008-2009 that social media had a far greater reach than conventional advertisement, so that's why literal armies of shills like you are paid to pretend to be grassroot people and push for a "cause". It's both cheaper than conventional advertisement, and far more effective.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:17 AM
5

two thirds of straight men between 18 and 50 can't have sex without money changing hands. That's the definition of incel, no matter what your boss pays you to say.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:14 AM
2

No offense, but you're a woman, you can't be lonely as stated in the question.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 04:12 AM
1

Thanks for proving you're nothing but a paid shill trying to mislead people.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:56 AM
1

They've always been.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:54 AM
3

It was never about equality. That word was merely a pretense.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 12:53 AM
1

Is there really a significant number?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:59 PM
13

They still copy and paste BS about a so-called wage age, though it was debunked in the mid 90's. Yet those copied and pasted lies yield results. I'm Canadian, and we get drowned under feminist laws that cost us hundreds of millions yearly. They drew the first blood/opened the floodgates. They've been using shere disinformation for decades now, so I see nothing wrong with us doing the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:09 PM
6

You are.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:05 PM
10

Look, I learned long ago to never debate with a feminist, and you reminded me why.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:53 PM
1

They know; that's their inspiration!
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:50 PM
64

Don't try to see any logic in this. Women are the ones babbling about age gaps.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:49 PM
5

Why? Sauce the goose.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:47 PM
13

You are deliberately misquoting me. I used the past tense. For decades, no, they didn't prosecute them unless something else factored in.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:46 PM
25

Fellow Canadian by the way. You're mixing things up. The cop/prosecutor/judge's sex is irrelevant. They live under social pressure. For decades, that crazy idea of pretending the judiciary was misogynist was simply coined as a trick to get women to have preferential treatment (family court, women insanely lower sentencing, etc...). As such, when a woman was caught red hand with a kid doing the deed, cops simply gave her a brochure and told her to get "help", and closed the case. As for teen male…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:10 PM
1

The overwhelming majority of men will die alone if they follow your bad advice.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 10:01 PM
1

That's because you are mixing apples and oranges. The topmost rich people on Earth are all men, and there are plenty historical reasons for this. They need to be excluded. Once you remove those aberrations, you realize that Net Flux is right.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:57 PM
1

To some extent, yes. However, keep in mind women are *already* the topmost privileged demographics. As such, "pretty privilege" is merely cherry on top that makes some women getting preferential treatments. But it nowhere means that "swamp creatures" get treated poorly nor that all topmodels grade women get handed a palace.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:48 PM
50

Dude, no offence, but that's yesterday's news. It's been known since the 1880's that women are either just as prone as men to engage in s.a. with minors, or a nudge more likely to do so. However, the rise of feminism resulted in women being the topmost privileged beings. As such, women had no problems talking themselves out of trouble when caught for sexual abuse on a minor. That was up until very recently, with laws forcing people to indiscriminately report sexual abuse no matter the sex of the…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 09:40 PM
2

Some do, yes.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 06:14 PM
-1

Ok, both statements are factually made up on the spot, and you're clearly just trying to troll on stuff you can't debate.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:28 PM
-2

Ok, both statements are factually made up on the spot, and you're clearly just trying to troll on stuff you can't debate.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:23 PM
3

As I said, it's only the tip of the iceberg. In Canada, we have landmark cases shielding female abusers. in the US, you still have landmark cases chilling male victims from reporting (the Obispo ruling, for example).
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:18 PM
-1

Yes they are, and I did mention European language. And NO angels can't reproduce. They're created by God.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:14 PM
-1

That's simply not true. Angels are asexual, and all angel/archangel first name have subsequently been used both for male and female first names in nearly all European language (Gabriel, Raphael, Nathaniel, etc...)
/r/MensRights05/09/24 04:08 PM
4

Thanks. But good luck with that second sentence. I'm confident saying that a few years (if not months) from now, feminists will have another puppet lawmaker make another exception for women, and the second mandatory reporting and prosecuting goes, heterosexual abuse on little boys will be brushed under the rug again. Here in Canada, we have landmark cases making it nearly impossible to prosecute a woman for heterosexual sexual abuse, and extremely hard in the case of homosexual sexual abuse. Any…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 04:05 PM
47

I'm a former paralegal. And I was sexually abused in my youth. You're seeing it backwards. It's been know since the late 19th century that women are just as prone as men to abuse minors, when not slightly MORE likely to do so. HOWEVER, for many social reasons, and "thanks" to feminism plaguing the Western World, women have always been able to talk themselves out of trouble when it comes to "this". And it still happens. The "epidemic" you are talking about is only because of recent laws making re…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter