TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LiamJ2304 Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by LiamJ2304 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Completely agree, however the logical extension of that for families could become “ok let’s not have kids” and if you extrapolate that then the Ponzi scheme of our economic setups (speaking about the UK) could experience risk. However I really don’t think it’s right to tax people without kids more to rebalance so it’s interesting to consider what we should do as a society, if anything. You could take a super logical view and say well if you choose to have kids you choose the downside but with bi…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 05:21 PM
5

I’m pretty sure there’s a really strong peer reviewed study which shows there’s little or no gender pay gap but there is a maternity pay gap. Essentially that if you choose not to have children you’re statistically unlikely to suffer. What we do about the maternity pay gap (if anything) is an interesting one though.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 12:53 AM
3

Totally agree, even on the more generous side this could be calculated based on something more reasonable than ‘earns’ half of what the working spouse earns. For example if you married someone working in childcare pre marriage you could take average earnings (factoring in progression) in that role and make an award based on a reasonable estimation of what they would’ve earned during the marriage (minus upkeep already paid). If you married a Marketing Director then same capped at 50% of working s…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:40 AM
5

This seems like a good part of the reason France blocks generalised paternity testing.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 11:20 AM
7

To be really candid it reads like this was caused by the fact you let your son go walkabout while you’re in the shower, this wouldn’t have been ideal and much harder if you were solo parenting but you had your wife with you she was in the pool with your daughter, why couldn’t she have both kids while you showered and then you swap over? The hotel actually showed a duty of care over your son. I would’ve probably been annoyed as you were but also relieved there are processes and practices in place…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:33 AM
-1

Absolutely and two other things 1. They may benefit from some state support but over their full lives they may be net contributors to the tax system and 2. For every fringe case where irrational mothers make a poor call, there will be other mothers who realise they either can’t afford to raise the baby alone or recognise the father’s opt out is an irrefutable sign he doesn’t want to do this not just a “he’s scared but he’ll get used to it” type argument. Those mothers might decide not to go thro…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:35 PM
7

OP you’re exactly right and I’ve thought this for a long time too. I also agree with the stance on bodily autonomy where no one can force the mother to an abortion or to carry to term. You can imagine some messed up ways that could be abused if a malicious partner had control over the decision, “do X or I’ll force you to abort the baby” but men should have a short window to permanently “opt out” either aligned with abortion rules or shortly after being first notified (whichever is later). This w…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:21 PM
1

Spectacularly well put.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 10:47 PM
7

Especially since he’s got less life to lose. He should go and simply take the bullets to his body to reduce their munition supplies, ah how noble.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:16 PM
8

Oh look, no answer from Shazaya, funny that.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 01:25 AM
2

100% noticed this too. The hypocrisy is honestly wild.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 07:41 PM
13

It’s not an argument of “don’t trust women because they’re women” it’s because women (read as biological women in this case) are the only ones who can give birth, so it’s a necessity.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 08:03 PM
1

You can literally google family abandonment rates. Your sheer arrogance and ignorance is breathtaking. The reality is you’re not interested in forming an empirical view, you’d prefer to let your feelings and “daily observations” form your strange views. Good luck to you, but I hope some day you have an epiphany and realise how foolish you’ve been. You mention Einstein a lot, I don’t think he’d think much of your arguments.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:22 AM
1

The burden of evidence is on the person asserting the point, you don’t get to say well this is correct and when disputed you ask for evidence? And if you’re going to decide that your daily observances constitutes valid data to make assertions on (which it almost certainly doesn’t) then why is it ok for you but not for others? Bizarre.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 05:08 PM
0

It’s amazing that you don’t have the self awareness to see how ridiculous it is to assert an opinion without evidence, while asking others to provide evidence for theirs. Hypocrite.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:47 PM
0

Asks for evidence and then says “likely abandoning their families…” with no evidence. ??????
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:21 AM
7

It’s tough to know whether it’s because technology has meant it’s easier to work more, get more done more quickly and there’s more scrutiny around output and activity, or whether it’s a genuine existential/psychological problem but the work done is consistent. Likely to be a bit of both but there will always be unhelpful individual examples of “this boomer does X” and “I know a Gen Z who acts like Y”.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 04:20 PM
7

I’ve said for a while I think there should be an opt-out for people who face unexpected pregnancy. Women have this already in being able to abort unilaterally, give away for adoption etc. men should have some sort of document which renounces their rights to access etc and at the same time absolves them of responsibility. I’m not suggesting we make this easy, you should have to decide within a certain date of notification/ideally at a stage where the woman can make an informed decision on what sh…
/r/MensRights14/03/23 04:07 PM
0

He’s like most people, right about some things and wrong about others. One thing I do like is cutting through the bullshit argument we sometimes hear which is: “men should just talk about their feelings and be more feminine.” Which is not really what a lot of straight women want in a partner, they want strength, competence and masculinity (obviously there are exceptions). But of course they can’t say that so prefer to virtue signal and say; actually all I want is a guy who talks about their feel…
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:18 PM
2

Painfully accurate.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:06 PM
3

Look up House on Fire by Mimi Webb it’s in the charts in the uk, ostensibly about a girl who gets lied to by her boyfriend and then burns his house down. Why the fuck is that ok?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:13 PM
1

Depends what you believe: If you believe women belong in the kitchen their fight for equality could feel like a threat to your view. That phrase could apply. If you believe men and women should have equal opportunities the feminist fight for women to be promoted/hired on the sole basis of their gender could feel like injustice and discrimination. I don’t think the phrase could apply to this. Personally I think eventually everyone will see sense but it will take people to be brave and stand up fo…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:50 AM
2

Bravo sir
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:50 PM
2

Yes, equality should mean true equality across all fields, specialisms and professions. It might also give some people an appreciation of the difficulty and skill required in construction and manual work and give perspective to views on “male privilege”
/r/MensRights02/07/22 11:42 AM
2

Absolutely, so it begs the question what is the solution? As a general rule I guess governments have an option to tax the behaviours they want to reduce and incentivise those they want to encourage. If we’re right about the ruling being to support population growth I guess it either means they think people can afford to have kids but choose not to for lifestyle reasons, or they can’t afford to but don’t care and want them to have kids anyway?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:53 PM
7

You are spectacularly right in your argument for this, this would represent true equality but isn’t it interesting how it seemingly rarely gets discussed. The big problem we’ve got, and in my view the underhanded reason RvW may have been overturned is that economically, society is desperately dependent on an ever expanding population. It needs young people to do lower skilled work while they gain experience and pay into the tax system, paying the pensions and healthcare (if you live in a country…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter