TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LibAtheist Archive

View 0 posts and 179 comments by LibAtheist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Ah, strict liability.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:50 PM
3

You can keep that bs too.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:46 PM
20

Thought crime. I hope that shit stays the fuck out of the US.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:33 AM
9

Facebook is not representative of what someone's life is actually like. They only post the extreme positive things.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:59 PM
15

Shoot first, plant evidence later?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:28 PM
2

People like the woman in the article are working very hard to redefine and disguise language so that it suits their political ends. It's a pretty classic tactic in politics. This way when people object to her behavior, she can scream that they are anti diversity and anti equality. For the person who doesn't look into the issue, it will look like the objector is what she is claiming. She can successfully attack her opponents character in this way. It works too unfortunately.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 06:01 PM
2

Be a juror period. So many people just want to get out of it. You've got a really good chance to help some poor schmuck out as the final check on the legal system. Know your rights as a juror though. Don't go in there believing the stacked deck bullshit they feed you.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:47 AM
6

Sounds like that's easily corrected for with proper training.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:56 AM
8

Why are there separate facilities to begin with? Are there separate facilities on the battlefield?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:52 AM
3

I will force you to agree with me! Literally, we're going to use state violence against you if you dont get on board. See! Progress!
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:23 PM
1

Sounds like you need new friends.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:19 PM
0

It probably does in his line of work. :-/
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:07 PM
6

There is institutionalized racism in a lot of police forces and the justice system. Conviction and sentencing disparity clearly shows that. Whether an individual incidence of police violence is part of that depends on the circumstances of that specific incident.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:07 PM
3

You mean he is politically calculating his policy decisions. He doesn't give two fucks about anything but his career.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:18 AM
2

Given your scenario, shouldn't both parties be arrested then? The initial aggressor and the person who in your opinion used too much force for self defense? I think you dont understand the concept of self defense as well, but that's just me. A person isn't an aggressor if they hit someone back who hit them first, even if they are a stronger and or more skilled fighter. If the person who started the fight didn't want their ass kicked, then they shouldn't be starting fights.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 07:06 PM
16

It doesn't make sense ethically either. It's not justice when you punish innocents in the pursuit of punishing guilty people.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:19 AM
3

Lived in Chicago for a year. Will never move back there.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:21 PM
6

Yeah, well the people of California are asking for these laws a lot of the time. Some argue that you get the government you deserve. I don't necessarily subscribe to that philosophy, but I can see why the laws are so crazy in California.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:37 PM
10

Good fucking god that shit is so fucking ridiculous. The dominant aggressor is the first aggressor. It's not even possible to be an aggressor if you didn't start a physical confrontation. Fuck CA and their bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:12 PM
5

I'd report those threats of violence if I were you. Not that I'd expect them to be acted on, but just in case something does happen, you've got proof that you have people threatening you.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:15 AM
9

Authoritarians are fucking terrible people.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:04 PM
5

Is she retarded? Seriously. A gun isn't fucking rocket science. In fact, it's a pretty basic piece of machinery. If the courts were fair and impartial, it's at the least manslaughter.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:34 AM
9

OP needs to get a new job where management doesn't have their head up their ass.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:43 PM
3

That was amazing.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 09:00 PM
6

Checking in as an egalitarian. I would not identify as an MRA. I promote individual rights. The individual is the true minority. If the world respected individual rights, we would probably be a more peaceful place.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:50 AM
24

Last time I checked, gender is a protected class, not the female gender. I know it doesn't always work like that though.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:44 PM
1

Let's hope not.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:33 PM
2

Lol, that's cute, you think republicans are for gun rights. Only so much as it advances their party platform.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:32 PM
1

Why does it destroy unit cohesion?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:27 PM
3

From my understanding, conscripted soldiers make shitty soldiers whether male or female.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:26 PM
1

I swear to god if one more person tells me that society is voluntary, I'm going to lose my fucking mind. Forcing people to do things under threat of violence is not fucking voluntary.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:07 PM
2

But our multinational corporate interests, er freedom!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:39 AM
8

Or, we could do away with slavery entirely.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:58 AM
1

But we all consented! That's the social contract!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:38 PM
3

I didn't elect anyone to send me to war.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:20 AM
1

Yes, I probably should have clarified that.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:00 PM
6

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Even if we assume there is a patriarchy, the fact that women don't have agency doesn't necessarily stem from the patriarchy. Could also be argument ad populum and appeal to emotion. The fact is that every individual has agency, even if they are oppressed. The only people that dont have agency are the severely mentally handicapped. Does feminist theory really assert that women dont have agency because of patriarchy? I'm a male, and I find that extremely offensive to wom…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:43 PM
1

Did you cite the federal statute or the state statute? The statute never mentions death or grievous bodily harm. This wasn't a deadly force scenario.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:55 AM
1

You can't be a pacifist and believe in self defense. You probably believe in the nonaggression principle.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:37 PM
1

Do you have any proof for this? Not that I don't believe you, but I'd like to read about it. I've been getting shit for stating, "lets all calm down, look at the entire situation, and not try and ruin this guy's life for one mistake in his life." That's not being received very well by the people I speak with unfortunately. I'm also really confused why football players are supposed to be role models. They play football, why do we expect anything else out of them? Granted I'm not giving him a pass…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:15 PM
2

And that very well may be the best option, or it might get you killed too.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:04 PM
2

That's not how self defense works. His ability doesn't matter. He responded with just as much force as she initiated with. She hit him in the face/head, and he did the same. Edit: from what I saw in the video. There of course could be more factors either justifying his use of force or not.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:48 PM
1

Self defense is a legitimate thing regardless of the gender of your attacker.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:37 PM
3

Bullshit. Some dude standing five feet from you with a knife in his hand screaming he is going to kill you doesn't deserve an escalation of force? Are you going to wait until he starts stabbing you to defend yourself?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 12:35 PM
1

What the hell does black college graduate rates have to do with blacks receiving disproportionate police harassment? I'm glad they are doing better, but that doesn't have bearing on what we are talking about. They also don't have equal opportunity when they are continually harassed by police and the legal system.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:56 AM
1

I was being facetious.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:52 AM
1

Why am I naive? That safety comes at a cost too, and it's one I'm not comfortable with.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:06 AM
1

Oh jesus. I don't know man, maybe if he was wearing a camera, we'd already have the video that showed either legitimate use of force or a murder. For all I know the officer had total legitimate use of force. That's the thing, we don't know, and all we have is a he said she said situation, and the police are dragging their feet over it. Maybe if the police weren't out busting people's balls over walking in the street, there wouldn't have even been a confrontation that led to this shooting. Maybe …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:59 AM
1

First, cameras on every cop. Second, end the war on drugs. This has allowed the police to systemically oppress people at will over matters that aren't even criminal in nature. Third, set up independent review boards for police involved shootings. The police shouldn't investigate police shootings. There is clearly a conflict of interest there. Fourth, restructure the DA and police relationship. No DA is going to pursue charges against cops unless it's politically advantageous. It's career suicide…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:38 AM
1

Why? Are you implying that the blue wall doesn't exist? If so, you're the one who shouldn't be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:24 AM
3

Imperfect regular people get to go to court. Cops very rarely get punished when they mess up like everyone else does. That fact alone makes them untrustworthy. When they refuse to police their own, they're all bad apples.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:17 AM
2

Cops are there to protect us right?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:45 AM
5

Cameras on every cop.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:33 AM
5

You mean like this?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 09:42 PM
29

God, so much this. I've spent,and still spend a bit of time at skate parks. THEY ARE NOT PLAYGROUNDS! Do not drop your small children of unattended. Most everyone there will be more than happy to share the park with people learning, but it's a dangerous ass place. I've seen multiple broken bones, head trauma, blunt force trauma and a bunch of collisions. Of course, most of these can be avoided, once you learn the lines, and how to read other people's lines, but that's not something your five yea…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:44 PM
4

They're going to protect you from harming yourself by harming you even worse. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:19 AM
1

An-Cap leaning libertarian here, and it sounds like you are full of shit. Do tell how you "tricked" other libertarians into admitting rape is ok by their principles? That's a very basic violation of the nonaggression principle.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:58 PM
10

Thank you. Take their "hate group" designations with a chunk of salt.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:49 PM
2

It wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:35 PM
2

I'm jealous that I'm not a ninja. :-(
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:07 AM
19

I just can't get over the staggering inequity in our western justice systems these days. If you're rich you can literally murder people and practically nothing happens to you. If you're rich you can commit fraud on such a massive scale that it crashes the worlds #1 economy, and nothing happens to you. If you're poor, and get caught with some drugs, you're doing prison time. Why do people even bother to have faith in the rule of law anymore?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:12 AM
-1

Would people chill out? I didn't state all college kids are like that. I agree that anyone trying to find a job right now is going to be dreading it. It's a shitty time to be selling your skills/labor/time. Don't get me wrong either, I'm not begrudging anyone for using assistance that is offered to them, no matter where it comes from. It's not immoral to use government benefits.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:55 AM
2

Well, I'd consider state involvement in mens' lives to be a damn pressing issue in the context of mens' rights, and specifically in regards to rape on campus as Vortex pointed out above me. The attitude that we need the state involved in everything we do is detrimental to men and women alike. Also, my politics aren't "right wing," they are freedom oriented. Something that neither the left nor the right are interested in.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 10:12 PM
9

Ha, have you talked to some of these college kids these days? They think they need to be taken care of by the state from cradle to grave. Personal responsibility is slowly being eroded from our society, and it's sad to see.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:58 PM
1

Bullets are the last option. No one wins in that scenario.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:29 AM
4

I'm not martyr material.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:00 PM
8

Enjoy being dead. The current system is so corrupt that is impossible. The only way you or I could do that is defend ourselves, and good luck making it to court if that happens. I'd really like to believe you, but I dont think it is possible.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:41 PM
8

Yeah, because factory farming is such a higher moral footing than hunting for your own food. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:18 PM
61

As an American police scare the shit out of me. No one else in society has such leeway to fuck my life up without any accountability. You should avoid them at all costs.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:15 PM
7

Do explain exactly who is going to make that happen?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:09 PM
5

That shit generally won't fly for too long in the real world.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 02:57 AM
0

Actually it is.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:57 AM
1

Then that's not a legal requirement. I was responding to the person who said they were legally required to report suspected abuse, which entails a legal penalty for not doing so, which is compelled speech.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:41 AM
0

Threatening someone with legal repercussions for not engaging in speech violates the 1st amendment. Freedom from and freedom of.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:00 AM
0

There is a distinct difference in engaging in a conspiracy to ensure that a crime doesn't get reported as well as shielding said individuals from scrutiny and just not reporting a crime.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 02:59 AM
1

You could just post a notice on your door that states audio and video recording takes place on the property.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:03 PM
1

Not many. Most states are one party consent. A few states are two party states.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:02 PM
1

And is compelled speech and is wholly unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:56 PM
1

You shouldn't be able to compel speech. 1st amendment and all.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:55 PM
2

Last time I checked, if you rape someone in the real world, you go to prison. Being in college doesn't shield you from that. I find it hard to believe there was any criminal element to this situation. Do you care to elaborate on how sexual "insensitivity" is a criminal act and in what context?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:47 PM
31

I think prison would be a better place for these predators.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:06 PM
10

I think some stronger language than "humiliated" is appropriate then. Someone is humiliated when they get called some names. This went way beyond that.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:47 PM
4

Agreed. I was pointing out that the police did a little more than humiliate this man.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:35 PM
15

They sexually assaulted and raped a man.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:14 PM
5

Granted, that happens with guys too. http://www.military.com/video/ammunition-and-explosives/grenades/grenade-toss-blooper/1141028753001/
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:03 PM
9

This is anecdotal, but I've heard plenty of stories of female and male LEO's not knowing what model and caliber their firearms are. The idea that police are highly trained in firearm use is a fallacy.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:30 PM
12

I can't even begin to imagine why this is a socially acceptable practice in our society.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:54 PM
11

That is horrible man. I would have got that cops badge and reported him.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:40 AM
2

I don't think the police can involuntarily commit you. A court has to do it.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:36 AM
1

I'll post it again here. Here's the proper order of how your interaction with the officer should have went. Officer, "Hi there can I ask you some questions?" You, "I'm actually a bit busy, am I being detained or am I free to go?" Situation 1 Officer, "You are not being detained, but I'd like to ask you some questions." You, "I'm a bit busy, I'll be leaving now." Get up and leave. Situation 2 Officer, "You are being detained." You, "....................." Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:34 AM
16

Here's the proper order of how your interaction with the officer should have went. Officer, "Hi there can I ask you some questions?" You, "I'm actually a bit busy, am I being detained or am I free to go?" Situation 1 Officer, "You are not being detained, but I'd like to ask you some questions." You, "I'm a bit busy, I'll be leaving now." Get up and leave. Situation 2 Officer, "You are being detained." You, "....................." Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:30 AM
0

Part of the problem. Thanks for making my case for me.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:56 PM
0

Wait, am I part of the problem (a) because I actually know what I'm talking about, (b) because I disagree with you, (c) because I'll be part of the judicial system once licensed, (d) because I encouraged you to behave like an active member of a democratic republic? No. I just want to know what I'm doing wrong, according to you. You're refusing to recognize what the constitution says. Just because it's settled case law, doesn't mean that the courts aren't violating people's rights by denying them…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:12 PM
11

I know that he's right in the sense that it's settled case law that you don't get to have access to a jury trial for cases less than a $1,000. That doesn't mean that the courts aren't violating people's rights by denying them access to jury trials.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:07 PM
3

If you're upset, try writing your state representatives and stop quoting the Bill of Rights to strangers on the internet. It's like I should expect my government to operate under the rules that itself put into place. Fuck me right? Thanks for being part of the problem.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:43 PM
2

I find the whole idea of "war with rules" absurd. You're already violating the fucking hell out of people's right to life, liberty, and property by engaging in warfare.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:24 PM
16

Probably because they DON'T have that authority under the seventh amendment. What is so unclear about it? Anything over $20 and you get a jury trial. If they want to change that, draw up a constitutional convention or get 2/3 of the house and senate together and change/repeal the seventh amendment. I'm sick and tired of our governments just making shit up as they go along.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:38 PM
16

Explain where in the amendment it grants authority to adjust the 20 for inflation?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:24 PM
6

Imagine if we respected everyone's rights! Gasp, how horrible would that be!?!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:22 PM
7

It's not like the supreme court doesn't fuck up the constitution all of the time. I'm pretty sure the sixth and seventh amendments are pretty clear. Look at Wickard versus Filburn. One of the most egregious over reaches rubber stamped by the supreme court. I wouldn't put much faith in the supreme court to uphold the constitution.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:22 PM
12

If I'm ever in legal trouble, I'm not signing shit without legal representation and review of said document, no matter how much they try and coerce me.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:17 PM
36

I'm just going to leave these here. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:12 PM
2

I'm assuming the state respects rights. We all have rights, they are inherent. The state only has the power to infringe on them.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:58 PM
6

That's probaby what I would do. I don't think he will have a remedy against the state, since they never do anything wrong and aren't accountable.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:56 PM
8

Isn't that a violation of the man's civil rights? I would think it would be.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:52 PM
1

Yeah, this one. I'm still a pretty big risk taker. Doubt that will ever go away. I've managed to channel that into a decent career, but I still like to jump off of high things and pushing my abilities at activities. It's amazing I didn't kill myself when I was younger.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:10 AM
5

That's SOP if they're checking for warrants most of the time. It's for your safety or some other such nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:47 AM
1

Get some recording equipment. If you are going to be confronting trespassers as part of your job, it's going to be invaluable.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:43 AM
1

I was being facetious. I suppose I should have tagged it with /s.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:05 PM
-1

Commendable, punctilious, honest. Are you sure you are dealing with a system that is the same? It's the justice system. It's right there in the name.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:26 AM
7

Yeah, locking people in cages for victimless crimes and taking money from people under threat of violence is such a noble pursuit. I have no doubt that most police officers want to and think they are doing their communities a service, but I can't ignore all the fucked up shit they do without repercussions and the shitty cops are protected by the good cops, making them all culpable. Get back to me when police start getting put in jail for kidnapping after they arrest someone for filming them in p…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 04:06 AM
11

Why is my distrust of police scary?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:46 AM
21

I don't trust either.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:16 AM
0

That's a troll blog right? Please tell me there aren't people like that vying for political power.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 01:48 PM
1

Then shut up.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:11 AM
4

1) Don't ever talk to the police until you've spoken with your lawyer. EVER. You have absolutely nothing to gain, especially if they have a warrant. 2)Don't ever talk to the police.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:05 AM
0

Yeah, god forbid I don't employ violence against others for political gain. What a shitty way to live my life. I'm done here. Murica!
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:53 AM
0

Um no, you obviously don't seem to understand that you sign up for the draft in the US. I think I understand it quite well. A lot more than you do at the very least. "The State! Always and ever the government and its rulers and operators have been considered above the general moral law. The "Pentagon Papers" are only one recent instance among innumerable instances in history of men, most of whom are perfectly honorable in their private lives, who lie in their teeth before the public. Why? For "r…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:21 AM
1

I think you need to look up the definition of conscription. You are obviously confused.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 02:37 AM
0

Coming from a country that doesn't even have free speech anymore and more and more provinces are employing "language police." I fail to see any relevance in your post about how 98 mph is always a reckless speed. Just some drivel about how your government likes to steal from you even more than the American government loves to steal from it's citizens.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 02:06 AM
0

Yeah, just deal with going to murder people you've never met. Man up right?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:57 AM
0

What happens if you do get drafted and choose not to fight?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:29 PM
0

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:06 PM
9

Nah, slavery is cool man. Only if it's the right kind of slavery. If you are a male and are enslaved to kill other people you've never met and don't want to fight, that's a ok in America. If you want to enslave black people for labor or women to kill other people they've never met and don't want to fight, then you're some kind of monster or something.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:39 PM
14

"Service guarantees citizenship."
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:33 PM
2

Ah, conscription. Totally not slavery, not at all.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:31 PM
0

I told him to essentially lawyer up ASAP. Hope he is smart enough to do it.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:10 PM
9

What in the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:01 PM
1

Good for you man. Good for you.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:00 PM
5

I would tell all the CC companies to eat a dick. If they sued me, I would file bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:38 AM
3

He really fucked up by not prosecuting her. I'd have his lawyer look at that incide again and see if he can get charges filed.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:30 AM
1

Seriously. OMG someone looked at me weird! Stop the presses and call the police!
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:01 AM
6

Lawyer yesterday. Seriously. This shit can ruin your life if not handled appropriately. Get a lawyer as of yesterday. Also, get preferably a video and audio recording device and have it on you at all times. If not, get an audio recording device at the least. Get an app that allows you to record phone conversations as well. Make sure to look up the wiretap laws in your state, but if you are a one party consent state, record all of your phone conversations as well.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:42 PM
1

I'm sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:32 AM
1

Merica!
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:59 AM
4

I don't think there are nearly 20,000 laws about her uterus.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 03:31 PM
1

Read, "For a New Liberty The Libertarian Manifesto" by Murray Rothbard.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:12 PM
4

Agreed. Conscription is slavery.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:40 PM
1

In OP's situation it might be different since she'd being prosecuted for filing a false report. If convicted, it would be much easier to get the jury to side in your favor. If not, you could end up looking like the guy that got away with rape, and then victimized the "victim" again by suing her in civil court. That could lead to the DA deciding to prosecute if they didn't in the first place, since they are political creatures. I would take your lawyers advice.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 03:32 PM
2

Wow. That's a bit extreme. I like women, even if they can be crazy from time to time.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:42 AM
5

Welcome to the world of DA's. They are a slimy bunch.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:51 AM
2

Sounds like you should be suing both arresting police departments for violating your civil rights and for false arrest, as well as suing your crazy ex wife. Here's hoping karma catches up to her.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:42 AM
4

You shouldn't. Your well being is the least of their concerns.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:23 AM
2

I know that some of my "friends" (not really) even use their bf's size against them in arguments or to insult them and some use it to say that the guy should feel lucky to be with her. That's a deal breaker right there. That's a vile thing to say to your SO.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:45 AM
1

But that's not what the government tells them. We're all equal in America, didn't you hear? You know, "liberty, and justice for all."
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:15 PM
2

Man, you must not have been paying attention to our "justice" system lately.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:24 AM
1

Oh my god, the human body not in it's prime! Would that really bother you that much?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:09 AM
1

I'm confused why people get in an uproar about public nudity. If people want to get naked, if it bothers me that much I'll just either not look, or leave. Edit: before the hate, I realize the context of this incident, and I think dude is a bit mental to do what he did. My above comment is meant to be applied generally.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:06 AM
2

Well, that would be up to the producer of the video game. Depends on the people making the game. There the ones who get to decide what their game is supposed to be.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:07 PM
18

Well, my girlfriend is a HUGE rapist then. Plenty of times she has been sober and I've been a bit under the influence. Oh wait, silly me, men are the only ones who can rape people.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:44 PM
1

Well, this is coming from a country that arrests people for speech. Not at all that surprised.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:40 PM
5

"Video games are not supposed to be a social message on the problematic views of society." I'll disagree with her on this part. Plenty of games I play or have played take this issue head on.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:24 PM
6

That video was quite amazing. I'd take the stance though that video games exaggerate both gender stereotypes though. Still, lots of strong women characters in video games and like she states, I doubt the game developers are making these characters these ways to push a misogynistic or misandristic (sp?) agenda.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:22 PM
1

One size fit's all? Last time I looked, age of consent laws vary quite widely from state to state.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:11 PM
1

I see no issues with what these women are doing so long as there is no fraud involved.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 07:49 PM
1

Well, my CCW class sure didn't teach that, but whatever, I guess I don't know what I'm talking about. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:32 PM
2

I upvoted you. Enjoy the karma lol.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:57 PM
2

Really? No one ever gets killed by getting punched in the head? No one ever gets brain damage by getting punched in the head?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:56 PM
1

Who said anything about not willing? Your damn right you better be willing to shoot someone if you pull your gun on them. Do you have to no, and I think your advice is bad advice. There are plenty examples of defensive gun use where no one ends up getting shot.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:54 PM
2

Doesn't mean they aren't going to fire him still. Shitty situation for him all around. Then again, it's a shitty situation any time you have to defend yourself. I signed the petition because he was in the right here even if he is bigger and stronger than her. He hit her then tried to remove her from the property AFTER she assaulted him. He didn't try and smash her head in.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:34 PM
1

Castle doctrine is common sense.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:28 PM
1

His attacker was still present and showed no intent on retreating. I'd still consider her a threat until she was removed from the bus, which he attempted to do.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:40 PM
0

Justified in using it. I doubt you'd get charged with drawing a weapon on someone threatening you with a knife if you could diffuse the situation without having to fire your weapon but you did draw it. Saying that if you draw your weapon that you should always fire it is dumb.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:39 PM
11

Again, depends on the state you live in. The state that I live in, I have no duty to retreat if I am somewhere I am legally allowed to be. Doesn't mean that fighting would be the right or smart thing to do, but I'm afforded that option legally, as I should be.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:03 AM
1

Depends on what state you live in and what laws are in place for use of lethal force as a civilian in that state. But you are right. Your attacker's safety is not of importance during their attack. If you happen to kill your attacker in preventing him from causing seriously bodily injury or killing you, so be it. No fucks would be given by me, just like no fucks are given that this woman got an uppercut to the jaw after assaulting someone.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:01 AM
5

Depends on a multitude of things. In this situation no. If she had a knife or blunt object, not that someone's fists aren't blunt objects and who knows what diseases this woman has, then yes you would be justified in drawing down on her in most states.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:56 AM
10

You don't think someone punching you in the head is a serious threat to your safety and life?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:52 AM
5

There is a lot more going on there than just financial issues.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:35 PM
2

Yeah, I know nothing about anarchism. Not that it's mainly about self governance, and not chaos and vandalism that the media portrays it as. I mean, I wouldn't appreciate the irony in the OP's being forced out of a community that is supposed to be about not initiating violence or coercion against others. I guess I've never read anything Bastiat or Rothbard wrote. Yep, your right, I'm a fool.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 11:02 AM
2

I'm pretty sure filing a false police report is a crime in most places.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:02 AM
12

I doubt most "anarchists" know what anarchism really means.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:02 AM
4

LOL the irony in being banned from the anarchist page.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:59 AM
1

That that shit to HR. You have an upper level manager openly advocating violence against men in your work place. HR will squash that real quick if they are halfway decent at their job.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:59 PM
2

Sheep who don't take their self defense seriously are easy targets for the wolves. Your mother lives in a fantasy land.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:27 PM
1

You assume there's justice being done in our justice system. We don't have a justice system, we have a legal system.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:56 AM
2

Pretty much. This isn't a mens' rights issue. It's an issue of our prison system being nothing but modern day slavery.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:53 AM
1

This. Any activist should go into it knowing that they are probably going to get arrested for some bullshit. That's what activism entails, especially if you plan to do it on a nonviolent level. You will get fucked with if you start making progress. You are dealing with people who only know how to use violence to get what they want, and their use of violence has the force of law behind it. If you start "threatening" their status by gaining popularity or support, they will respond with violence mo…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:01 PM
3

When's the last time the US has been invaded? We don't fight defensive wars anymore.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:23 AM
3

Conscription is sex-specific slavery and should be abolished altogether. It's much worse than slavery.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 06:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter