TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LiberalsLoveRape Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by LiberalsLoveRape on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Yeah exactly who is histrionic here. Firstly, I didn't write that, which is implicit in your tone. Secondly, the guy is saying he has proof of these things and he has quotes that indicate the same sentiments. If this were Wikileaks (no different), you guys would be slobbering all over the guy waiting for the information to come out. The amount of hysteria and length to which it goes is an order of magnitude higher in SRS and amongst the MRA antagonists in general. I'm going to laugh my ass off w…
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:43 PM
0

Picked up on the clues yet, JW? ROFL. Those aren't my initials, Leroy, not even close. If you dingleberries were to cut down in the bong rips, you might stop laughing and realize that whoever this dude is, he has you so worked up that you're running around Reddit paranoid style, projecting your homo fantasies upon random people.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:35 PM
0

Way to avoid the question you clearly can't answer. Bye troll.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:38 AM
-4

A fourth time? Sigh. Why do you guys post in an MRA sub-Reddit, when you can't even answer basic questions? We already know you come in to downvote and troll conversations, but seriously. What happens the this crazy men's rights 9/11 that ya'll are losing your minds over doesn't happen?
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:33 AM
-2

Seriously, this is not working out for you at all. Try something new. Translation: "But the sky will fall".
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:27 AM
-7

And you come back and try to use the same tactic I just called you on. You called me on making fun of you guys' collective hysteria. Got me pretty good. You still didn't answer, what happens when the sky doesn't fall?
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:22 AM
-5

Yeah, and trying that old played out 'HURR DE DURR UR A WOMAN LEMME GASLIGHT YOU" shit wont work in this direction. Yawn. What are you hens going to do when this histrionic, imaginary 9/11 men's rights mass murder as a result of these posts doesn't happen? It will probably be a letdown considering the frenzy you guys are whipping yourselves into.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 12:17 AM
0

Yawn. Not my first time having a loony Reddit stalker, but it's absolutely hilarious that you're wasting your time on a troll account with somebody that you are convinced is somebody else.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 10:14 PM
1

Oh okay, so it's fine to use a negative female stereotype because some of the people you're using to insult it are male, okay. It was a quick figure of speech aimed at the overly histrionic manginas that come to r/mensrights from SRS. Certainly nothing worth having a fit over. So, uh, I could use the n-word if a group of people, some of whom are white, are being shitty, and I want to insult them? This is a great situation to bring up. See, to SRS, MRA's are crazed, evil, white, hetero, cis-gende…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:49 PM
-2

Women honestly care more about rating each other than anything else, don't really see the market for it. Not to mention, the only metric that really needs to be posted on a site like this are the dudes' bank account balances. Sounds like another Google Plus that no one will use.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:28 PM
0

Initial post. Sorry SRS'ers...Perhaps you guys are all group menstruating, I don't know, just let it go. I'll give you a few minutes to connect the dots.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:26 PM
0

I'm asking why you think saying things like 'perhaps you're all just group menstruating' is going to do anything other than make you look like a group of furious sexists? You are aware, that the majority of SRS leadership and posters are male, right?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 09:06 PM
-3

That doesn't answer my question. I'm not asking about r/SRS or feminists, all you're doing is avoiding the question and say 'THEY STARTED IT!'. The old "Do as I say, not as I do" routine. Nice. Besides, that only strengthens my points. If you think feminists are so batshit crazy, why don't people take the opportunity to be sane and reasonable in the face of that, instead of making clearly sexist insults? Quite the opposite, we are clearly more tolerant and rational than our detractors. Out of fe…
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:49 PM
-6

...when you say things like 'perhaps you guys are all group menstruating'? As opposed the oikaphobia and histrionic yammering in SRS about evil, white, racist, woman beating, misogynistic MRA's out to start mass killings of feminists (see above) enslave women and return us to the 1950's? Please.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:29 PM
-18

Also, learn how to use a fucking comma. That's funny. Sociology or English major?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:18 AM
-28

I find it hilarious when you people use 'liberal arts major' as some kind of insult. 'Cause literacy is totally for losers. Liberal Arts are important, I have two LA minors and believe in a balanced education. However, the stupidity and folly of people who avoid STEM fields like the plague and MAJOR in easy fields like English, History or Sociology is pretty obvious.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 03:22 AM
-19

I saw your post at SRS, I would respond but I'm banned. Well played, sir.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 01:28 AM
-23

You guys have a thread in SRS where you are all collectively acting like hysterical women and shitting your pants over this. What are you dullards doing even posting in here? Seriously, the one sided circle jerk isn't interesting enough for you?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:48 AM
-7

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:38 AM
-34

One would think trolls from a sub-Reddit full of liberal arts majors, would know how to properly use bullet points.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:36 AM
-10

I just wanted to say that I think you're a nutcase. You don't speak for me. Says the idiot troll.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 12:01 AM
-13

Yeah, the SRS'ers are reaching a new level of butthurt and hysteria here. What's odd is, while I've gotten at least -50 karma from them today, my karma has actually gone up 15 or 20 points. I guess Reddit's algorithm can figure out how some of these cheesedicks are mass downvoting and compensate.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:39 PM
-12

Awesome job man! You know you're setting off a tidal wave of hysteria that is going to work its way through the feminist blogosphere and feminist related sites over the next 24 hours. Just knowing that the SRS whackadoos are already shitting their pants and getting all worked up is making my day.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:35 PM
-65

Wherein we have proof MRAs are a batshit insane, violence advocating hate group that takes shit too fucking far in their paranoid fantasy land bullshit and will GET PEOPLE KILLED. You should cut down on the soap operas, there is honestly no need to be this dramatic.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:21 PM
-43

If we falsely accuse a man of rape, we immediately splash his name all over the news, associate him forever with rape in the public eye and potentially ruin his life, without so much as batting an eye. However, if we expose people who actively promote divisive hate speech under some misguided false notion of equality, that's like asking for another 9/11. Sounds reasonable. Sorry SRS'ers, but being histrionic and crying wolf because it may come to light who some crazy hate mongers are, is laughab…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:15 PM
-17

Dude, this is awesome. I've always said I believe in political guerrilla warfare. If one has the chance to get some of these nutbags fired and/or exposed, wonderful. You're getting massively downvoted by the shitstains of SRS, but this is a GREAT idea.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 08:53 PM
6

It's funny, because you just know they are gigantic pussies in real life, but are seethingly hate filled and histrionic at the same time.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 08:47 PM
-3

Liberals don't care whether it's true or not, it's the intentions behind the lie, and whether one feels good that's important. It's like the rule of thumb, or women making seventy-five cents on the dollar, liberals will just repeat the lie Ad Nauseum until people believe it, because in the end, it's their version of social justice that matters.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 05:20 PM
0

I think it's naive and ignorant to say "leftist ideology is repsonsible" for 90% of the road blocks. It's factual. Find legislation that elevates women at the expense of men, or that simply hurts men out of some misguided good intention, chances are there will be a (D) next to the author's name. The liberals coming around to MRA are not doing so despite their liberal beliefs, but because of them. Well, for the last fifteen years they have laughed at men's issues. In fact, most liberals still do.…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 05:11 PM
-1

Is this the same guy who runs around projecting his fantasies on MRA's, believing everyone in here is some guy he knows called "Mellowgreen"? Newsflash kid, you should get out of the trailer more often, you're a paranoid nutter.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 04:34 PM
1

I disagree. Everyone deserves their say if they think it's worth saying. Now, are they exactly what you said? Yea, pretty much, but they're still human and are capable of valid viewpoints. I understand your point and it has some merit. While treating them like sub-humans may only serve to reinforce the inadequacy and paranoid persecution complex at the center of their neurosis, I have over the years, found that attempting to reason with emotionally driven people is about as productive as banging…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 03:49 PM
3

You're oversimplifying something due to your hatred of anything not as conservative as you and it dirties any real points you make. Here's the deal, this new influx of liberals suddenly interested in Men's Rights issues is a relatively recent phenomenon; over the past 15 years conservatives were usually the only ones willing to discuss and listen to these issues. A huge portion of the problems men face have their roots solidly in liberalism and while I welcome all the johnny come lately liberals…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:35 AM
2

Your people skills and debate skills suck ass. Says the guy with the Red Herring of China. The argument was Karl Marx would be happy with the state of the family today, which he would. China? OK, I'll play. The United States GDP per capita is SIX times what China's is, I'm not sure on what planet that's "kicking our ass". Their wages are lower in China. Their citizens are executed for tax evasion. They disappear in the night if they are seen as a threat to the government. They are so heavily cen…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 08:37 PM
13

The mods are too busy harassing MRAs to ban SRS trolls. Real laughter was produced there, thanks man. I will agree after sitting in their IRC for a while, they are just really pathetic. You know that one guy in every group of friends, that everybody seethingly hates because he is so grating and annoying, but he always seems to turn up? Everyone in SRS, is that guy.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:56 PM
0

Those are all rightwing drone sites... The second result is California State University, and a faculty paper which says essentially the same things I'm saying. I'm not going to get in some drawn out dissection of Marxist economic theory, splitting hairs on how it relates to the family. Communism is a joke, it is stupid, only stupid people believe in it. Its rejection of the traditional family at its core, is accepted, settled, social science and history. Only a cadre of liberal nutters who can't…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:49 PM
25

It's pretty obvious to me that they are just angry and bitter about things ... Dude, go sit in their chat. It's essentially a bunch of losers who fell for the liberal arts pyramid scheme in college, who now live at home and try to stay professional students so they don't have to pay back student loans, move out from moms and join the real world. It's a sad, utterly pathetic group of people. What the mods need to do, is start banning the koo koos from SRS whenever they post here, period. They dis…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:19 PM
-6

Let me google that for you, chief.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 07:10 PM
-2

It was the capitalists that put women to work, in order to reduce wage cost after child labor was made illegal. That's koo koo talk, sounds like something an English Lit professor would say when going on some anti-capitalistic rant that has nothing to do with class. In addition, I think it was liberals who wanted women working, at least in part so they could tax the other half of the country. The fact is, communists saw the nuclear family as an impediment to implementing their ideals, and they s…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 06:53 PM
-3

Karl Marx would be pleased.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 04:51 PM
3

I'm not going to attack him personally, but I think everything boils down to the fact that he is an inexperienced kid. A grown family man who is out of school and in the real world likely wouldn't have time to police a sub-Reddit. That being said, he definitely has a limited understanding of men's issues and he gets very uppity when forced to reconcile his overtly leftist ideology with modern men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:01 PM
1

See above. Nice squirm though.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 03:39 AM
2

Being FORCED to follow traditional gender roles is mutually exclusive with equal rights. Being ALLOWED to follow traditional gender roles is implied by equal rights. Read the above posts, again. In the complex social/genetic environment of raising a family, how does one clearly define the line between either? I would appreciate an honest answer. Loaded question. For the kid who is still in school and is not in the real world, isn't a father and has no experience with family, you are a mod here, …
/r/MensRights14/12/11 03:36 AM
2

You really don't understand the concept, do you? I can answer simple questions. I don't however, understand your supposition. Are traditional gender roles and equal rights mutually exclusive? Yes, or no.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 11:49 PM
12

Probably fake, but I have been through a situation with my ex-wife which for years I would consider to be worse than this one. I also had a friend who went through a situation where his ex moved to another city hours away and he was left with no contact with his young son. He was broke, the new guy was a dentist with deep pockets and they would simply hang up when he called and bury him in legal filings. He put a shotgun in his mouth two years ago over Tanner. Now, what I will say, is that we do…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 10:30 PM
1

Forcing someone to do something based on their genetics is ethically wrong. People should be limited by their capabilities and choice, not their predispositions. Is forcing a young child to speak, learn words and process language based on our inherent genetic abilities and socially developed language ethically wrong? I would say not. I'm not accepting the premise that gender roles, which have developed over hundreds of thousands of years and which have genetic as well as social components, must …
/r/MensRights13/12/11 10:16 PM
1

...reject the idea of "equal rights", and want to return to a system of gendered roles. Are traditional gender roles and equal rights mutually exclusive? Gender roles evolved over hundreds of thousands of years and are a combination of nature and nurture. Intuitively, I don't understand how homogenizing the sexes overnight is productive or necessary for equality.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:55 PM
1

He also publicly apologized for that and retracted the Harry Truman statement. Fair enough, after he got called out hardcore he did retract 15% of what he said. He also said that we didn't warn Japan, that was a blatant lie, we did with millions of arial leaflets. He said we should've dropped one of our two available bombs in the ocean, which was not very bright (Japan didn't capitulate after the first bomb was dropped on a city, why would telling them the hour when we were coming and dropping o…
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:47 PM
0

These guys are pretty much all cowards. They make up ridiculous straw men and constantly get facts wrong, then when they are called on it, they hide behind the "Oh, but I'm just a comedian doing the 23 skidoo" routine. Remember when Jon Stewart called Harry Truman a war criminal for dropping the atomic bomb and insinuated we should have started a land war in Japan?
/r/MensRights10/12/11 03:37 PM
-1

I like that the feminists are lions. To be fair, the lioness' go hunt while the lions chill. But you know, that's sexist, I've always said that there should be some online petition on SRS to stop all that.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 06:50 AM
-4

TIL violence against children is acceptable The garden variety liberal feminist believes that domestic violence against an adult woman, who can fight back, walk away, call the police and/or explore any of 100 publicly paid for options, is worse than an adult woman committing violence against a child. It's evident in almost any conversation with a feminist when discussing domestic violence, in which those on the feminist side will take any and all opportunities to minimize or re-direct away from …
/r/MensRights09/12/11 11:46 PM
2

Not all liberals are feminists. Fair enough. How do liberals who do not identify as feminist, yet support liberal candidates who align themselves with feminists and their ideology, fit into that category? At what point is there passive approval? In other words, if one supports a clearly racist candidate, can they sit back and say "hey....it's not me man...."?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:30 PM
1

Most feminists also happen to be liberals. Classical association fallacy right here. Sure, there's always a huge chance that the feminist/liberal connection could be false. However, I haven't met many, if any, conservative feminists. I've also met relatively few liberal MRA's (a relatively recent phenomenon). In short, yes, I could keep an open mind and assume all stop lights are different. Maybe one day I'll pull up to a stop light in another county and green will mean stop instead of go. I sup…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:08 PM
0

And yet you seem to think that this is a simple thing that anybody could master. or to play a musical instrument to the point where they are a skillful jazz musician with no training I qualified earlier that it was a combination of practice (conscientious parenting time) and creative thinking, meaning the more one parents, the better one can become at it using the right approach. I also think music and language can be easy to excel at if one follows the right formula. And all of this is still ig…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 06:35 PM
0

Both a new language and a piano are infinitely more predictable than a developing and learning child. There are rules and the rules don't change. Do you understand Jazz or foreign dialect? The analogy works quite well because both can constitute an intersection of traditional left and right brain thinking. Simple logic will not make one an excellent and diverse guitar player skilled at Jazz improvisation, nor will simply it make one comfortable bantering with first time dinner guests in a second…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 05:06 PM
1

All I see from "conservatives" are vague comments about how "liberals" are fucking everything up. We could go over the list of usual suspects who have fucked things up with good intentions, Joe Biden is an easy one. They almost always have a (D) next to their name. I understand it's tough to accept, but realize, if you are an MRA, the majority of people who identify with liberalism hate you. This new fad of liberals joining the movement is great, but the johnny-come-latelies shouldn't kid themse…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:13 PM
2

I have little doubt these statistics are true. What should be noted is that women are usually still the primary caretakers - even in two parent homes. This does not mean there is an exact proportional relationship to child abuse and parenting time (avg. days per month). There is no mystery to parenting, for the conscientious it is akin to learning a new language or the piano. The more one focuses and does it, the more relaxed and the better one gets at it. Systems are put in place for dealing wi…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:01 PM
-2

I'm a liberal. I've been in the movement for around fifteen years. Before that, I was marginally interested for another ten. In most of that time, the people responsible for 99% of the scathing attacks on men's issues were liberals. The people who have consistently put up roadblocks for addressing men's issues were liberals. The people who viewed caring about boys' issues as being wholly detrimental to girls', were liberals. This was present online and in an very active social life as a pretty p…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 03:22 PM
-8

I applaud anyone who puts this little truth out there, even if it means repeating ourselves. What's quite interesting is the main argument typical liberals and MRA antagonists use when dismissing the numbers in a domestic violence context; it typically goes like this "Yes, but I'm just talking about violence against women...". The idea implicit in this misdirection, is consistently that violence against an adult woman who can defend herself, call the police, leave in a car, or depend on any of a…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 02:59 PM
2

But wait, liberals told me for thirty years that if women ran things there would be no more wars and we would live at the end of rainbows. I will say, the penis envy is hilarious and reminds me of the insecurity and anger present in all of the men's rights antagonist sub-Reddits.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 02:40 PM
0

If there's anything liberals love, it's serial false accusers. She'll probably get a scholarship from the women's studies department for raising awareness.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:15 PM
6

I leave scales in various areas around the house.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 09:33 PM
1

Yes, but liberals are subhuman people, they don't count.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 03:44 PM
6

SRS trolls love rape.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 03:18 PM
9

To a liberal, saying hello to a woman in an elevator is a form of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 04:22 AM
5

People are starting to see some of the negative effects of feminism. The young, ignorant modern feminists are angry at the backlash from society, so they lash out. They are losing credibility and clout every day as their women's studies programs are being dismantled and their specious claims are debunked. The average girl who mentions feminism on a college campus is laughed at openly, even by other females. This is a sign of better things to come, as people have had enough of well intentioned li…
/r/MensRights18/11/11 08:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter