~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transgenderism: What causes it? Is it bad for society? How can transgender people best be helped to have the fullest and happiest lives?https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6710751/Transgender-women-birth-time-thanks-pioneering-womb-transplants.html If you want to see a reaction to this by one of the Femcels: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCynical/comments/hcpk4x/a_public_figure_voicing_her_desire_for_trans/ | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/08/20 10:45 PM |
| 1 | Transgenderism: What causes it? Is it bad for society? How can transgender people best be helped to have the fullest and happiest lives?Transgenderism is seen as an attack mainly on real cis female privilege by 'traditionally feminine girls' and 'violates the sacred tradition of uterus veneration' in culture, just another outdated notion that needs to go. Nothing more. Its kind of known that we are getting close to the point where transwomen will be able to have their own biological children. Let them do what they want with their bodies. The trouble is that the alt-rightists hijacked the mainstream men's rights position to be ab… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 23/08/20 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Why not pursue policies that make it as expensive to exploit men as possible? Just an idea to give men freedom from gender rolesThe thing is that gender roles pushed on men have inspired violence, war crimes and mass killings over conquest for status. They’ve also inspired neoliberalism and exploitation of the Earth’s resources in a way that it’s contributing to global warming. Like rape was made taboo so should this, telling somebody to dress nicer is innocent compared to the above. Stopping male gender roles is a humanitarian cause hence. As I said, dating is not a human rights issue and not my concern if abolition lea… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 14/06/20 02:43 AM |
| 1 | Why not pursue policies that make it as expensive to exploit men as possible? Just an idea to give men freedom from gender rolesOnly wanted to say the name to prove my point but just saying FDS should be ok then? So they are proof of Ernest Bax’s theories and that men are exploited. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/20 11:58 AM |
| 1 | Why not pursue policies that make it as expensive to exploit men as possible? Just an idea to give men freedom from gender rolesIf the reason is not for status then it wouldn’t be I suppose, at the very least that would be indicated by both putting in their fair share of work. Many of the time there is deliberate exploitation though. Anyway I meant taking Bax’s analysis into account, also the proof I have for his theories that men are exploited for their surplus is that FDS sub. At the very least they should pay more taxes, perhaps this can be done by taxing the industries she buys from so they pay more money for doing i… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/20 08:01 AM |
| 1 | "Which side are you on boys?" (Male unionist song) -Peter SeegerA song about male trade unionists. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/06/20 07:47 AM |
| 1 | "Which side are you on boys?" (Male unionist song) -Peter SeegerI thought it would be ok to take it away since it was made known. It’s a piece of media of relevance and talks about male unionists. That was in the statement. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/06/20 06:29 AM |
| 1 | Fact is men being kept in their gender roles causes nearly all bloodshed, scarcity of natural resources (including food) or suffering in the world, something to noteYou clearly don’t know what forum let alone thread you are in. Men are oppressed, downtrodden and exploited by their gender roles. This thread is regarding a thesis by a YouTuber and other people that men being kept in their gender roles by women and other TradCon men is the cause of the majority of bloodshed, suffering and unnecessary imperialist wars. My ideal would be to for a diversity quota in jobs where more men can enter ‘female only’ occupations so that more women can be made to step dow… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 04:58 PM |
| 1 | Keeping men in their gender roles is completely unethical and requires a deal of psychopathy or psychopathic traits to do it, the more you feel for people the less successful you will be in doing itWatch this to understand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUFQriJSmdQ | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 03:53 PM |
| 2 | Fact is men being kept in their gender roles causes nearly all bloodshed, scarcity of natural resources (including food) or suffering in the world, something to noteHow about men stick together and ignore those women then and be pro-male instead? Focus on helping and cooperating with their fellow men. Fight for welfare or for the abolition of the current imperialist system. They can leave if they want to, plus it’s better off for men’s well-being not to have them in their lives anyway if they cause so much issues. Also what would you say if we did something like abolish private land/workplace ownership and create an environment where men cannot be exploited… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Fact is men being kept in their gender roles causes nearly all bloodshed, scarcity of natural resources (including food) or suffering in the world, something to noteEqual rights includes having the same privileges or rights as women in society, which means being free from gender roles. I said men should stick to themselves or with each other and not follow them rather than pander in trying to ‘pursue women’ and be exploited, then you were concerned about ‘them not getting any women and being lonely’. How about then that a diversity quota is made so that more men are in occupations only women are allowed in for starters? And including women in drafts? Maybe … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 03:10 PM |
| 2 | Fact is men being kept in their gender roles causes nearly all bloodshed, scarcity of natural resources (including food) or suffering in the world, something to noteWhy can’t men have equal rights with women though in society and the same level of care? Including universal housing/welfare programs, protection by laws, exemption from drafting unless both sexes are included and freedom to drop out of status pursuit lifestyles? Also I was just putting it in for us to only just know as a fact that male gender roles and any responsible for fuelling them create the majority of suffering in the world, plus might even be driving us to destruction. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 03:00 PM |
| 0 | Fact is men being kept in their gender roles causes nearly all bloodshed, scarcity of natural resources (including food) or suffering in the world, something to noteTelling men to put 'pursuing women over having equal rights' as you did previously elsewhere or that 'men should be happy not having equal rights with women so long as they can have a girl', is 'tell-tale sign of an ideologue' (Especially a TradCon Jordan Peterson one). Instead of addressing or refuting our theory and points you try to shut us down. TradCon Scabs like JP are inherently anti-male because your side prioritizes 'men giving up their human rights to appease women in dating' and your … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 02:19 PM |
| 0 | Keeping men in their gender roles is completely unethical and requires a deal of psychopathy or psychopathic traits to do it, the more you feel for people the less successful you will be in doing itYou don't care about men or male individuality, you care about your 'pussy needs' more than your fellow men. You put men pursuing or 'protecting' women over men having equal rights with women. TradCons like you have used this to justify male only drafts or conscription and the marriage system. You want to enslave men for the women who support doing that. Its you who want your society to continue to be enforced on men. We have studies showing that if men were not mandated to be in gender roles by… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 01:33 PM |
| 1 | Keeping men in their gender roles is completely unethical and requires a deal of psychopathy or psychopathic traits to do it, the more you feel for people the less successful you will be in doing itThere are types who don’t do this or haven’t, but the ones among women who select for status pursuit enslaved men by keeping them in their gender roles to exploit them. Not saying they should have an obligation to date anybody but the effects of their slavery are real, and men should have equal rights with them. A species where ‘mating’ occurs a lot of the time by rape doesn’t make it not rape. Women often (But not always) exploit men for the resources they can accumulate. It is exploitation and… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 12:04 PM |
| 1 | Keeping men in their gender roles is completely unethical and requires a deal of psychopathy or psychopathic traits to do it, the more you feel for people the less successful you will be in doing itThey expect men to die in imperialist wars and lead to widespread bloodshed or suffering for starters. It involves an insane amount of cruelty and reinforcing unnecessary conflict to accumulate resources from others. Gender roles were abolished under historical societies like the Soviet Union and men were allowed all privileges or opportunities considered ‘only for women’. Both sexes were equally drafted. Men were not expected to pursue status or attack each other under Socialist states to survi… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 11:05 AM |
| 1 | 'Kill or be killed' - The Worst Kind of SlaveryVideo by YouTuber Pro-Male Vanguard covering the conscription aspect of male gender roles and other bits. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 08:04 AM |
| 1 | Keeping men in their gender roles is completely unethical and requires a deal of psychopathy or psychopathic traits to do it, the more you feel for people the less successful you will be in doing itThe fundamental nature of gender roles that men are kept in are completely unethical due to all the things it involves. It literally takes having psychopathy to enforce them on any living thing. If you 'feel for people' you will really fail to continue doing it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/20 08:00 AM |
| 8 | Success isn’t a lifestyle choice for menWhich is why lower class men must unionise or stick together, even in unemployed workers’ unions if possible since unemployed men including homeless are basically still kept by society as wage slaves. That’s how they got society to ‘care about them’ although it took getting shot or beaten by cops, mercenaries and soldiers a lot of the time. Worked in the past though in ‘getting society to care about them’. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/20 01:35 AM |
| 1 | Success isn’t a lifestyle choice for menShould post this comment on that thread too. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/20 01:33 AM |
| 3 | Success isn’t a lifestyle choice for menPursuing status isn’t a lifestyle choice for men, we are obligated. Post on r/unpopularopinion forum. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/20 12:34 AM |
| 1 | Idea: Experiment or study to find out who is to blame for creating male gender roles, how do you think it can be done and who would be interested in carrying it out?What about if we are talking about ‘blame’ just in the context of finding who is objectively responsible that keeps doing it? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 06:48 PM |
| 2 | Idea: Experiment or study to find out who is to blame for creating male gender roles, how do you think it can be done and who would be interested in carrying it out?Blame helps us find out the cause and in turn who keeps creating them, that’s what I meant. Then we can act in a way with that information to stop them from being created and ensure they never come back. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 05:47 PM |
| 5 | Idea: Experiment or study to find out who is to blame for creating male gender roles, how do you think it can be done and who would be interested in carrying it out?So we know how to implement the abolition or campaign for that, if we find out the causes it will make abolishing them far more easy. Especially if you want to do it quickly. Its best for people to know who the oppressor is so they also in turn know how to guard against them just incase and call out all their influences so society becomes free of them. If you want to do it for example through the method of a cultural revolution also this could be important. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 05:13 PM |
| 4 | I just can't fathom what this is, have no words but this image alone tells us who is on the right side of historyWell also and I think the class of women who help create gender roles don't want other women dismantling their privilege. Hence they also shame rebel women who don't obey them or tell society to do so. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 05:00 PM |
| 3 | Idea: Experiment or study to find out who is to blame for creating male gender roles, how do you think it can be done and who would be interested in carrying it out?I'm somebody who has dedicated themselves awhile for finding out how to uproot the influences of psychopaths on human society and I am now suspecting this is where all female ones are at. I might have found them, and its disturbing to say there's a huge amount given what I have seen the last couple of weeks. Women who keep men in their gender roles qualify as highly possible candidates, and also the ones in nursing homes or mental asylums who patients have reported abuse from. Its even possible … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 04:48 PM |
| 1 | Most people, regardless of gender, prefer staying home to do chores / childcare instead of working a full-time job. Staying home instead of working is a privilege and women appear to enforce this gender role at least as often as men do, if not more.I have a thesis or theory also that all women who want men to be kept in their gender roles can be diagnosed positive for having atleast some clinical psychopathy due to what they involve. This is where all the hidden 'female psychopaths' psychologists have wondered the whereabouts of are residing at, the other sections might be the nurses that work in mental asylums or in aged care people have reported mistreatment from. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 04:42 PM |
| 3 | The Early Labor Movements were skeptical of adopting Feminist ideology and only agreed to cooperate with some women's movements on truly egalitarian grounds, were they right to be that way?Not all Socialist or Labor movements were Marxist however and plus you had the Anarchists. A number of them were not. The Paris Commune of 1871 certainly wasn't. Ernest Bax might not have been a Marxist for example despite being a socialist and men's right advocate. I've personally known some men's advocates who are socialist but say they don't agree with all of Marxism's take on it. I would just be talking about the union movements in general, why did they fall from relevance? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 04:28 PM |
| 3 | Most people, regardless of gender, prefer staying home to do chores / childcare instead of working a full-time job. Staying home instead of working is a privilege and women appear to enforce this gender role at least as often as men do, if not more.This needs to be shared, alot. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 04:17 PM |
| 6 | The Early Labor Movements were skeptical of adopting Feminist ideology and only agreed to cooperate with some women's movements on truly egalitarian grounds, were they right to be that way?Well hasn't hard or dangerous labor technically just been outsourced overseas? The ones that rely on even more harsh and cruel implementations of male gender roles. When Socialism or Anarchism was more popular among men they were known for being so radical that society frequently sometimes tried to label them as 'terrorist threats'. Something to note. You literally had police gun down the men who were in labor movements or beat them to the point of death/near death. The military were brought in … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 04:00 PM |
| 7 | The Early Labor Movements were skeptical of adopting Feminist ideology and only agreed to cooperate with some women's movements on truly egalitarian grounds, were they right to be that way?Many men became socialists in the past though (Notably in the 19th or Early 20th centuries) and the socialist movement was once known as being largely male dominated, same for Anarchists. Why did that stop? They were also extremely radical during that period and the status quo were legitimately scared of them. There were women who shamed men for being anti-war, socialists or anarchists like the White Feather Movement who even hated the Russian revolution. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 03:44 PM |
| 1 | The Early Labor Movements were skeptical of adopting Feminist ideology and only agreed to cooperate with some women's movements on truly egalitarian grounds, were they right to be that way?It was meant to encourage posts about perspectives as to why they were right to be skeptical of feminism's IDPol aspects. Similar to how rhetorical questions are done. I wanted to see some further discussion on how or why choosing not to allow their ideology in was the right choice on this thread. Also do you think its possible allowing it in during the 1960s/1970s played a role in the decline of labor and socialist movements by any means? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 03:27 PM |
| 3 | I just can't fathom what this is, have no words but this image alone tells us who is on the right side of historyLOL the household wouldn't exist in the first place without the one who pays or paid for it unlike before Capitalism when we had common land. This image alone is enough to show who is on the right side of history and should clear away all your doubts of fighting for male advocacy, be sure to share it around. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 02:37 PM |
| 3 | The reason men don't cry is because people don't care about them. It's an issue with society, not masculinity.Men under capitalism (Especially ones who won't wish to conform to gender roles and get punished for doing so) are the most downtrodden, exploited, oppressed and miserable group of people that will ever exist throughout history. The definition of ‘the proletariat who are not allowed to express their emotions in fear it will cause revolt against the capitalist status quo, who are down in the muck and miserable with nothing to lose but their chains’ applies far more to men and permanently. Even be… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 01:44 PM |
| 7 | The reason men don't cry is because people don't care about them. It's an issue with society, not masculinity.Suppressing male emotion and disinterest in them are in the interests of the Capitalist and Imperialist anti-male systems to keep going. This is why Pro-Male Collective claims that feminists are liars. They say they want to abolish male gender roles but don't want to in reality, it is always empty promises literally every single time literally. The early labor movements and people like Ernest Belfort Bax are suspicious of working together with feminists purely for the sake of 'feminism' and only… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 01:25 PM |
| 3 | why is no mra talking about this ??????Pro-Male Collective as a movement does this, and exists because no movement so far does which is dedicated to liberating men from gender roles as its sole focus. Also it has nothing to do with the manosphere, right wingers among the MRAs who support gender roles among men or incels in general. Abolishing male gender roles will solve nearly all issues in the world since neoliberalism or imperialist wars are caused by them. Pro-Male Collective hopes it can get the fake reactionary anti-male right … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/06/20 12:39 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter