~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Google got pressured in by BBC to study gender pay gap, since some Google woman employees felt being discriminated. Google did. Men now earn more.I'm still having to assume your answers to most of the questions I've asked. I'm gathering that, since you say more women are currently earning STEM field degrees than men are, that women who have already possibly been hired into positions and pay scales below their merit compared to their male peers aren't a problem and hiring practices and in this case algorithms that advantage men over women aren't a problem. Edit: Also, the "majority" of degrees going to women in STEM is just over 50%, and i… | /r/PussyPass | 18/04/19 10:35 PM |
| 2 | Google got pressured in by BBC to study gender pay gap, since some Google woman employees felt being discriminated. Google did. Men now earn more.I reposted it because your initial response didn't address anything in what I had said directly. I could have made assumptions about what you believe, but didn't. My point was that an algorithm to find the best candidates choosing more from an advantaged group than a disadvantaged one doesn't mean it excluded "women because they pretty much suck at what men can do." Do you accept that the system has disproportionately provided opportunities for some over others? If so, do you see that as a probl… | /r/PussyPass | 18/04/19 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Google got pressured in by BBC to study gender pay gap, since some Google woman employees felt being discriminated. Google did. Men now earn more.If we accept that a system has disproportionately provided opportunities and, thus, experience to one group in the past and we agree this is bad and unfair how would you propose reversing and correcting this? Would hiring based on prior experience, historically afforded disproportionately to one group over the other, be a solution or a way to maintain an imbalance? | /r/PussyPass | 18/04/19 08:35 PM |
| 2 | Google got pressured in by BBC to study gender pay gap, since some Google woman employees felt being discriminated. Google did. Men now earn more." Company officials acknowledged that it did not address whether women were hired at a lower pay grade than men with similar qualifications. " " Google has denied paying women less, and the company agreed that compensation among similar job titles was not by itself a complete measure of equity. A more difficult issue to solve is a human resources concept called leveling. Are employees assigned to the appropriate pay grade for their qualifications? " " Kelly Ellis, a former Google engineer and on… | /r/PussyPass | 03/04/19 10:59 PM |
| 1 | Google got pressured in by BBC to study gender pay gap, since some Google woman employees felt being discriminated. Google did. Men now earn more.If we accept that a system has disproportionately provided opportunities and, thus, experience to one group in the past and we agree this is bad and unfair how would you propose reversing and correcting this? Would hiring based on prior experience, historically afforded disproportionately to one group over the other, be a solution or a way to maintain an imbalance? | /r/PussyPass | 03/04/19 10:54 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter