LightBringer777 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Reading her diary and how I became MGTOW Yeah I see what he's going for and I agree nobody wants to share their partner. Although, I personally have never wanted marriage. I can't imagine having sex with the same person for my entire life, especially after childbearing.	/r/MGTOW	02/05/19 11:48 PM
2	Reading her diary and how I became MGTOW Agreed. Personally, I've never wanted marriage. I can't imagine having sex with the same woman for the rest of my life, especially after having children.	/r/MGTOW	02/05/19 11:47 PM
0	Reading her diary and how I became MGTOW I agree with women knowing they can charm us and their propensity to manipulate for their desire. Although, what do you mean we want them exclusively?	/r/MGTOW	02/05/19 09:27 PM
0	Big if true I agree with the last bit of your post and I never said they can’t be consider filthy whores, it’s just that not caring what they do as well as many other opinions that one could possibly hold doesn’t warrant the tag of white knighting. I of course, fall in the not caring section of opinions and believe that this women garbage can get in the way of the good content this sub produces. I do yield to what another commenter said, that it does pose a good reminder and that reminders are pertinent in …	/r/MGTOW	27/03/19 10:43 PM
0	Big if true True, I imagine that was the intent behind the post. Just slightly tired of all the female related garbage on this sub. I honestly don’t care what they do and I believe it gets in the way of the good content this sub knocks out.	/r/MGTOW	27/03/19 10:32 PM
-2	Big if true Right, because anything less than calling them filthy whores is white knighting?	/r/MGTOW	27/03/19 10:29 PM
0	Big if true What’s wrong with that? I thought this is men going their own way, not what women do with their lives.	/r/MGTOW	27/03/19 09:17 PM
8	10/10 toxic masculinity Orwell was a leftist.	/r/MGTOW	21/03/19 10:31 PM
1	This guy has it right. Two things. First, isn’t this mgtow? My understanding is that this a community of men who forgo companionship with women on some level and may or may not be celibate, depending on the man. Second, screwing around and developing an intimate relationship with a woman isn’t mutually exclusive. I will concede that it is more difficult and perhaps more rare than the standard relationship but isn’t impossible. Lastly, speaking for myself. Not since grade school have I had a drive to develop said intim…	/r/MGTOW	03/03/19 05:32 AM
-2	This guy has it right. Having sex with more than one person for the rest of your life and having a companion or a family aren’t mutually exclusive; however, I understand the drive for an exclusive partner from a cold rational standpoint, but emotionally, the concept is completely foreign to me. I have yet to meet a woman that I have even come close to wanting a life long commitment/exclusive relationship with. Let alone kids.	/r/MGTOW	03/03/19 05:03 AM
-2	This guy has it right. I know it’s an opinion not shared by many on this sub, but I have no idea how someone could commit to having sexual with one person for the rest of their lives.	/r/MGTOW	03/03/19 01:38 AM
1	Woow Lol I’m the one flailing , in the one who isn’t “very good at this,” and trying to pass ideas off as your position? That’s comical, but what I actually did was alter your comparison into a more accurate representation.	/r/MGTOW	02/03/19 02:13 AM
6	You played yourselves People have been saying “the world is broken” and “the world is going to end” for generations now and it’s still chugging along.	/r/MGTOW	02/03/19 02:06 AM
1	Woow I am aware of what you said. I took your comparison and altered it to better fit the facts of the discussion. It’s interesting to think that your last response is essentially a “no u” canned remark with more verbiage. It’s also interesting that you consider this discussion as a debate, with a winner and looser and the. regressed to using insults in order to illustrate what you believe to be my lose only reinforces the notion of your lack of maturity, intelligence, and this discussion going the w…	/r/MGTOW	01/03/19 05:24 AM
1	Woow Atheism is a belief system similar to bald being a hair style in the fact that is the lack of hair. Correct, anarchism does eliminate government but it is still a system of government in that it lacks it. From a briefly pursing of your comment history it is easy to discern that you are an ignorant/stupid child using reddit to propagate obscure and retarded beliefs.	/r/MGTOW	28/02/19 06:15 PM
1	Woow Anarchism is still a system of governance similar to atheism still being a belief system. Second, not Everton agree with your definition. Some define anarchism as the elimination of hierarchies. Resorting to childish name calling and ad hominem arguments is and always been a strong indicator of maturity, intelligence, and that the discussion isn’t going the way that you intend.	/r/MGTOW	28/02/19 05:03 AM
1	Woow That’s a straw man, taken out of context, I said it’s a system of government like any version of anarchism. You seem to be interpreting what I mean by being a viable option. I’m addressing the fact that anarcho-communism is feasible belief system, as in people can believe in it, not the feasibility of it actually in practice.	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 11:57 PM
1	Woow Okay I said it twice. It’s as though you only read my statement where I said I said it’s an alternative and viable option and stopped. You said you didn’t want to debate either anarcho-communism or anarcho-capitalism. You also made several claims concerning anarcho-communism, specifically it’s self-refutable and paradoxical and never provided evidence or arguments supporting those claims. As I’m not a anarcho-communist, my knowledge concerning anarcho-communism is limited to it being one of the …	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 11:32 PM
1	Woow I only said that anarcho-communism exists and is a viable option once. My entire point up until now is that it exists as a school of thought. You said you didn’t want to discuss the pros or cons of said school of thought or anarcho-capitalism. You have also failed to provide any evidence or arguments as to why anarcho-communism is paradoxical, self-contradictory, viability, and untruthful.	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 07:05 PM
1	Woow I don’t support the school of thought but I think it’s viable and that you’re wrong. So right back at you bud.	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 04:30 PM
1	Woow Well I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree.	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 04:23 PM
1	Woow What? There hasnt been some deep mystery to all this. They’re simply different schools of thoughts and closing your eyes and pretending they’re not there doesn’t preclude them from existence. In fact there has only been one claim, that anarcho- communism exists.	/r/MGTOW	27/02/19 03:50 PM
1	Woow I was more commenting on how it seemed that you want to argue about the highs of anarcho-capitalism and the lows of anarcho-communism or communism in general.	/r/MGTOW	26/02/19 10:30 PM
1	Woow Okay. Thanks for sharing your opinion l. Is it just me or are you trying to get into a discussion regarding the comparative analysis of anarcho-capitalism and communism?	/r/MGTOW	26/02/19 09:47 PM
1	Woow Don’t be dense. I’m not talking about whether it works or not or whether force is required. I’m informing you that there is a viable school of thought concerning anarchy-communism when you initial said there was none.	/r/MGTOW	26/02/19 08:57 PM
1	Woow Haha well I try to follow higher standards. Also I appreciate that you didn’t do those things as well!	/r/MGTOW	26/02/19 05:27 PM
1	Woow In communist theory at that time class would be dissolved and everyone would want to be communist hence no need for government. Similar to any anarchy’s society force wouldn’t be necessary and compliance at this point would be voluntary. It sounds as though you’re unfamiliar with Marxist theory. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-communism	/r/MGTOW	26/02/19 02:46 AM
-1	Woow I’m not making an appeal to history. I’m stating a fact that a lot of anarchist philosophy was born out of communism. Theoretically, communism wishes to dissolve the state.	/r/MGTOW	25/02/19 08:16 PM
3	Woow I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree.	/r/MGTOW	25/02/19 08:15 PM
3	Woow Because the government is an extension of the people’s will.	/r/MGTOW	25/02/19 07:35 PM
3	Woow A lot of wealth is inherited. Also, the third world would like to talk to you about the ability to accumulate wealth. They’re always exceptions.	/r/MGTOW	25/02/19 07:34 PM
1	Woow A lot of anarchist theory owes itself to communism.	/r/MGTOW	25/02/19 07:32 PM
4	I bet some girls are laughing saying "this is so me" but dont realize how messed up it is I completely agree. I even think that the urge to not be alone is often stronger than the urge for sex. As for weak men, I think that the urge to not be alone is something that has plagued man, women, and everything in between since the dawn of time. Only the incidentals (laws, technology, etc.) have changed. It takes a shit lot load of time for evolution to catch up with the modern environment.	/r/MGTOW	02/01/19 08:30 PM
137	I bet some girls are laughing saying "this is so me" but dont realize how messed up it is Honestly I would have ended it right there.	/r/MGTOW	02/01/19 04:52 AM
1	Feminism - fantasy vs reality What about the communist/feminist that support men going there on way?	/r/MGTOW	09/12/18 11:50 PM
3	OKCupid deleted their nine-year-old blog article about how men and women rate each other's attractiveness Fair question.	/r/MGTOW	28/11/18 11:36 PM
1	Mans best friend Unfortunately I’ve always been more of a cat person.	/r/MGTOW	18/11/18 05:21 AM
1	Mans best friend Not home enough to have a dog. Although my cats great.	/r/MGTOW	18/11/18 05:08 AM
3	Very wealthy men marry women much younger on average. (22 years younger on average) From a rich male’s perspective I’m sure they’re not too heart broken as Long as they have a prenup.	/r/BlackPillScience	23/07/18 09:30 PM
5	Very wealthy men marry women much younger on average. (22 years younger on average) Fake in what’s sense? The love? From a rich males perspective as soon as his attraction deteriorates for his partner or he finds someone who is his more attracted to he has no reason to stay as long as there is a prenup (if married). Sounds like a good deal from a male’s perspective.	/r/BlackPillScience	23/07/18 09:28 PM