TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lightinthebottle7 Archive

View 0 posts and 277 comments by Lightinthebottle7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Man discovers consent and is shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:45 PM
1

The bane of MGTOW is the fact that nobody gives a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 03:14 PM
-3

I was talking about the post and the relation between what you have wrote and the post. I firmly believe however that you fundamentally misunderstand what this means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:10 PM
-3

There is nothing scientific about this nonsense. This is the opposite of science or the scientific method. The only thing this proves is that you don't speak to women or view them as human at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:54 PM
-5

How many times will we run the same circles over and over? How many times do we have to see morally bankrupt social rejects whine about women being the reason for their own personal problems? This utter rejection of the personhood and humanity of women, is exactly the reason why most of y'all will forever remain lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:49 PM

What survey? Also, I prefer taller women than me, yet all women I've dated were either shorter or of similar height to me. Quit trying to justify existing beliefs with cherrypicked surveys.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:54 AM
4

This trips even on its own logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 12:13 PM
1

Do you not know the difference if you look at something vs if you stare at something?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:04 AM
2

You can look at my man titties boy as long as you want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:03 AM
3

There is nothing wrong with looking, the problem is with staring and harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:02 AM
1

There is this novelty concept of...consent. Maybe you should study it a bit more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:00 AM
1

So essentially: Step 1: be a sociopath Step 2: spend years building a life with another human being, who of couse looks over this problem. Step 3: abandon the life you have built completely Step 4: see as another man takes your place and be the person you never was Step 5: this will somehow end feminism Please never reproduce, though, given your behavior displayed, I have an inkling that no self respecting woman would want to spend time with you, as you seem to be a horrible person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:35 AM
5

Because the older 50+ conservative guys would still hit that thicc inner city liberal chick in her 20's. Of course, said woman, wants nothing to do with them. Recently there was a poll in my country that showed this exact trend, as conservative pro-government people (tend to be over 45-50 and more predominantly male) are more open to dating opposition voters (who tend to be younger than that, with a lot more women) while opposition voters are the least likely to cross political lines and date so…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 10:17 AM
0

Igen, te is mehetsz a kurva anyádba.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 08:00 PM
0

Neked meg a kurva anyádat.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 07:49 PM
6

What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:00 AM
0

Men and women are single at the same rate. (Pew research data, I can't be bothered to post it) Multiple partners at the same time (both who know about each other and those who don't) for any extended period of time are rare. Like what are you even on about? You sound like a person whose problem with "promiscuity" is that he isn't the one receiving it, so you invent fictional scenarios to be mad about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 12:43 AM
0

"Women are the selectors" mfs when they get selected out of the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 01:53 PM
1

If you don't want to believe me, that is up to you. It is the truth. I've met dozens of people personally whom I originally met on discord, It isn't much of a shocker that I ended up dating a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 03:02 PM
0

I dated 2 girls IRL, whom I originally met on discord, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 02:59 PM
1

They have seen my mug before we met personally or before they expressed interest openly, but yes we spent months usually before, talking to each other, them not knowing how I look like. (Or me how they)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:47 AM
1

Can't describe all, and some are really not remarkable, but here are a few highlights: 1) Met with a girl on discord, we were both young (both high schoolers) at the time. We often talked about our interests and subjects we liked, as well as hobbies that we shared. She developed a crush on me in the meanwhile (which I noticed) and eventually she came to me with it. We met a few times, we dated for a while. We weren't compatible sadly, and we had some bad downs. We drifted apart but a few years l…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:07 AM
0

Nearly all my relationships happened because I was approached, and I'm a man. 🤷 (no I ain't tall, I don't earn six figures and I don't think I'm especially handsome. I was even cold approached a few times)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 05:14 AM
3

Except they very much do. They have their own insecurities, but they very much approach with such intentions. You are also contradicting yourself (they don't but they do) Men do get approached. Heck, I had gfs who were mistaken for friends that were approached for my number.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:49 PM
2

The "dating market" isn't "broken" because there aren't enough women (in general, because infanticide caused an actual gender imbalance in China).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:00 PM
2

Dating app surveys, especially things like OkCupid and Tinder, are useless in this regard. And I set my preferences usually above 6' as a man, most of my dates were below that. Not that It means anything, most men are below 6' and most men can find dates just fine. (Making the assumption that this assertion is even true, but like the reason for dating app results is that the gender ratio is skewed. Few women, many men. Basically survivorship bias, the women who remain are the women who have many…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:30 AM
2

Whatever women like...they aren't a single entity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:22 AM
2

Dude, I'm a fat, avarage height neckbeard and I get asked out. I would say I'm very much, intimately in touch. I got a date by challenging her to a LOL 1v1 once. I got another where I recruited her to help me paint WW2 minies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:15 PM
5

[scratch] [Sigh] "Should I tell him?" "Nah"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 02:01 PM
5

What do you think it means? Attractive by [current] conventions. Beauty standards shift heavily through place, time and people. Major trends can be observed. Doesn't mean everybody is into them, much less that they are exclusively into them. And furthermore, this is also extremely subjective. Are you really this completely out of touch?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:46 PM
5

Heck, I'm only into women and even I think Picard in STNG was a sexy man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:44 PM
0

You would like to know that wouldn't you? Speak to some women, get some friends, actually listen to them a bit. The size of the stupidity of this statement is so enormous, it can be seen from space, and that you don't immediately know why, tells me all I need to know about, how much you are actually familiar with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:34 PM
4

I nearly burst out laughing when I read that. No, absolutely not, that is baseless nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:24 PM
3

Like, have I heard a woman say, she prefers tall guys? Yes, but like, I prefer tall women. Have I heard women who don't want to date someone because they are black or indian or whatever? Yes, and those were usually racists, who are definately their own kind of people. I never actually heard, thinking back, any women ever saying whether or not they prefer bald or full head of hair, but I did hear wildly differing opinions about facial and body hair. These are personal preferences, not universal b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 01:00 PM
4

Like, have I heard a woman say, she prefers tall guys? Yes, but like, I prefer tall women. Have I heard women who don't want to date someone because they are black or indian or whatever? Yes, and those were usually racists, who are definately their own kind of people. I never actually heard, thinking back, any women ever saying whether or not they prefer bald or full head of hair, but I did hear wildly differing opinions about facial and body hair. These are personal preferences, not universal b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:59 PM
6

Yes, a lot of people indeed use the internet. This doesn't change that what you have referred to as "beauty standards" here has very little to do with "female spaces" and more with internet memes and echo chambers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:54 PM
7

So, let's be clear about something. Discounting some deep rabbit holes into which no sane person should ever venture into, these "beauty standards" on what is and isn't attractive on the internet, are really inventions of men. Like, women had basically no direct input. Many guys know nothing about how attraction works and what "women" really want. (Women still aren't a single entity) The self reinforcing echo chambers of incels and red pillers produced just absurd nonsense that a single visit in…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 12:30 PM
7

It is just so obvious they barely speak to women, let alone know anything about "feminism", outside of what they are told in their bubbles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 06:30 AM
11

It is frankly baffling, how completely out of touch with reality some of these posts are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:14 AM
17

What the actual fuck are you talking about? Are you 15 years old just off a fresh, AI generated alpha male edit?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 04:09 AM
2

The science behind this notion is questioned. https://www.webmd.com/sex/features/sex-drive-how-do-men-women-compare https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160630-the-enduring-enigma-of-female-desire The thing is. Stereotypes, societal norms and probably a host of other factors go into this, and there is research that backs up the idea, that actually, the level sexual desire of women and men aren't that different The belief in men having more sexual desire than women is often times based on assumpt…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 11:27 PM
0

That is not at all reasonable, and the part that can be punished without violating personal rights is already punishable. To put it bluntly, cheating isn't and should not be a crime. Shitty thing to do? Yes. But crime? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:14 AM
2

"no relevance" "You are obviously right" Pick one
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:13 AM
2

It is really funny you commented that without actually adressing a single thing I've said.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:07 AM
0

The only thing this post tell us, is OP's complete unfamiliarity with both women and men and the world. For women, they aren't a monolith after a few specific things. For men, they aren't a monolith either who can just do one thing or the other. On the world, pretending that doing MORE gender conflict would solve anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:01 AM
1

You can attempt at trying to twist and turn it and point fingers at people, that "they aren't the red pill". The thing is, it really doesn't matter that much. It is formed and defined by the people in it, and the thing is, it is full of the people you say are supposedly doing the opposite of what it is meant to be. The thing is, "the red pill" is not really a well defined, objective thing. And most people who identify themselves with the "red pill" aren't at all like what you have described and …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:48 PM
1

Tldr: It is cringe nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:42 PM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:27 AM
2

1) you can't 2) see the requirements to discuss in such manner, you posess none of them. All edge, no point, sparkled with disturbing ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:24 AM
5

You can have a provocative way of engaging in service of furthering a conversation, true, even I do it. You are not however. It requires a level of knowledge, ability to converse, sensitivity and good faith to work, without that, you are just relativizing rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:34 AM
11

Using this as bait also makes them a disgusting and evil person.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 06:07 AM
1

Why did he feel the need to lie?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:40 PM
1

Ask the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:26 PM
1

Ask OP why he claimed that she set him on fire for telling a "joke", thus lying. I just corrected it. Also, it is part of the entire story, which OP neglected to tell. I didn't claim she didn't set him on fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:51 PM
1

I didn't say or imply that it is okay for the wife to get drunk and beat her husband. Really only OP implied that it matters in such capacity. I for one focused on how OP lied about the events.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:00 PM
1

A sudden burst of emotion is a real thing and represented in the legal system. Neither I or "male abusers" invented it and this is not about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:10 PM
2

There is a longer comment of mine under the main one where I describe it in more detail. OP's response was to sentence the woman to be raped btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 09:10 AM
3

Because...circumstances create the sentence...and this person lied about and misrepresented the circumstances in an attempt to push an idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 08:07 AM
2

I encourage you to do your own digging, I could always be wrong. 🤷 Thanks btw. Much appriciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 08:05 AM
3

No you don't, I didn't say you do. Apparently, you are reading things that are not there 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:54 AM
2

No, I don't think so. It is up there with all of the random and completely unsupported speculations. (I'm having coincidentally my criminal law exam today btw)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:48 AM
2

It is irrelevant that it was a "she" that harmed a "man". And she got a real punishment, it is 7.5 years in prison with the possibility of parole. You say everything, except the actual law. You are not talking about criminal justice, you are talking about your perversions, and you are dishonest about the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:36 AM
0

Because attempted murder requires a very specific intent to kill and that intent has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Basically the prosecution has to prove, that the woman had a kind of premeditated idea going like this: "I want to kill you" At best, what happened was "in heat of passion" Edit: I speculate about "attempted voluntary manslaughter", but realised it is probably covered by previous legal titles under different names.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:23 AM
3

What you describe has nothing to do with justice, it is your own disgusting fetishes put on full display.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:53 AM
3

It is irrelevant when it comes to law. There is nothing lenient here, you just don't understand the law. Also, what you describe is disgusting, what the actual fuck? Edit: he deleted it, but he basically said that the woman should be given to a male prison and raped for the rest of her life
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:50 AM
6

Yes? What matters is 1) the law, which prescribes the crime and the punishment 2) her state of mind 3) other circumstances present, exhonorating or not. What are you going to charge her with? I presume something along the lines of causing life threatening injuries while influenced by heavy emotions. Unless there is a specific law for "IMMOLATING" it is going to be either some form of assault and battery, causing grievous bodily harm or (unlikely, but maybe if you stretch it far enough) attempted…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:44 AM
-1

That is not true in this form. In fact, I even may say it is a lie. So, they had a serious argument during a night, after both were drinking and he made several negative comments about her. She snapped, when he said to her that "she should stay in the kitchen instead of going out drinking with boys" Given the circumstances I'm reading, 7.5 years is not a very light sentence. You are lying about her position and the facts of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:37 AM
3

It is more likely for me to realise my lifelong dream of being the househusband of a rich businesswoman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 04:04 AM
6

Somebody just watched a youtube video of a young white male influencer who similarly to them never talked to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 10:38 PM
2

In your personal experience befriending women didn't help your chances? We heard it all, pack it up lads and ladies, this is definitive proof that having cordial, casual, platonic relationship with women is completely useless when it comes to getting dates on the long run. Don't even bother talking to them. (Yes, this is sarcasm)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:55 AM
1

I'm in one with a woman who asked me out. She isn't blind, so my guess would be that she found me attractive, and if that is the case, honestly every argument here about attraction, mainly by people who know nothing about it, is just laughably wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 05:54 AM
37

More incel fanfiction of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 05:32 AM

First of all, that is a very narrow and subjective perspective full of hearsay. Second, quit pretending that this is something only women do. Third, this is only a tiny fraction of women, which has no impact on your personal chances. Some have disturbing preferences, which is once again a proof that attraction is subjective. Women are not a monolith. Four, beyond that, a charismatic phsycho is still charismatic a charismatic person, something that is an extremely important factor when it comes t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:06 AM

Man, I don't think that there is anything arbitrary about how disgusting it would be to force people to have sex with you if you can't get laid on your own. Get your act together.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:17 PM

It applies to women though. You are not worse off cuz' you are a man and yes if a woman has a bad sex life, it is her job to fix that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 02:00 PM

A disturbing amount of people don't understand consent and personal responsibility here. Though, given what nonsense many here subscribe to, it is not that shocking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:49 AM

Women are nor water. What are you on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:48 AM
0

Obligatory there are no leagues, it is nonsense. I was approached by all kinds of different women. All I can say are my answers Some highlights include(in no particular order: a vile bully in school (ew) a furry at a [not furry] convention (expressing this to my then girlfriend who she thought was just my friend) a girl who had the biggest naturals I've ever seen but was like...not smart...very not smart(no) a bipolar tomboy (should have said no) A fit woman in her 30's when I worked as a cashie…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:41 PM
0

You should probably get less information about this from tiktok.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:53 AM
3

All I said is that it is nonsense, just like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:48 PM
3

Not while arguing about dick sizes you didn't 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:41 PM

Until you are preoccupied, I asked out your crush, she said yes, and now we are heading to my place. You have this champ, surely you will win this debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:01 PM

This post is just as nonsensical as all other posts about dick size. How is anyone rejecting you for your size, if they haven't seen you naked?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:49 AM
0

This is not fact, it is nonsense. Baseless. Not grounded in reality. Should I conceptually explain what that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:06 AM
1

I read your answer, and it suggests you don't just believe in nonsense, you have trouble with reading comprehension. I googled it, you said nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:04 AM
1

That...is literally what I said...Can you not read? It is Hitchen's razor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:02 AM
0

It is logical. What can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without it. It is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:00 AM
0

Watch less "alpha male" content, it is frying your brain. Like, the level of which your position is not grounded in reality is astonishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:58 AM

Blaming women for your personal problems, where have I heard that one before?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:31 AM
8

And allegedly you eat roadkill.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 05:07 AM
15

Skill issue
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:22 PM
0

You think it has nothing to do with it? Smh. It obviously does. There is nothing special (by black/redpill standards) about my features. They notice me, think I'm interesting, that I'm socialising and a lot of people seem to know me, that I chat up women who all seem happy to talk to me and even hug me (female friend=huge green flag), that I'm aproachable, that I'm not simply part of the crowd. They might even hear about me from friends if our social circles connect. Most of the times they appro…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:58 PM
2

It did happen to me 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 01:35 PM
14

Lol. Man, you watch tiktok videos and instagram reels, and think you know more about women than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:06 AM
15

It did work out. In ways a man usually just dreams of. And I don't qualify to most of those standards. They are also generally bullshit. You should communicate with women more really.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:27 AM
23

I'll be frank. You live in an echo chamber. Those standards are not universal, I'm struggling to understand where you even go them (based on your answers, tiktok and instagram...I don't know what to tell you what hasn't already been said, but those are not objective sources and you arguing with women about what women want is just funny). You know, I'm kind of selfishly glad, that the bar is in hell and people believe shit like this, cuz' it means I have to put way less effort into getting compan…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:22 AM
3

Eh. Like, I know I'm a dude, but let me give some things. It really depends on the person, there is no universal answer to this question. Some don't even like to talk about it on the third date, some get you to bed before the first one. The one in the post implied an attempt at a longer commitment, the way the guy talked implied he is not interested in dates or her as a person just sex. It was also. inappropriate for him to talk about her appearance this way, especially if boundaries about this …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:06 AM

Dunno'. I mainly just make sure that I'm not the one they are complaining about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:42 AM
2

I mean, you can't "kill" the "motherfucker" and you can't abandon them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:21 AM
1

Nothing is simpler than this. Women are not fish, and relationships have no comparison what so ever to fishing. I say a quote that is better. "Blind leads the wordless" (wordless being an euphemism for blind people) Dont let insecure, maidenless, unsuccessful single men, who can't for the life of them have a normal relationship hold you down with terrible advice. I'll give you one advice for free however that you will find a lot of uses for. You don't know what passes for ugly or not. I believed…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 07:40 PM
23

So, Whether or not the condom remains on the weiner is your choice. What is this tanget even about feminism? How does it come here? There are a bunch of ways of male birth control, which is your decision to take or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:26 PM
2

You good bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 08:17 AM
18

Let's pretend for a second that the avarage red piller is actually a content man. They are not, but let's pretend that. If you are a content man, who wants to stay out of things, you should mind your own business and quit trying to hold back others, instead of infesting everything with your poisonous regressive ideology. Don't want to do anything with yourself? That is also fine, but don't make it the problem of others. Also, It is not men who are blamed as a whole, it is certain men. You should…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:53 AM
3

I'm sure that being called a misogynist is not something new for you. But it is really just that. His arguments are entirely based on misogynist nonsense. That is my argument, that it is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 02:20 PM
3

I've linked among other things peer reviewed studies. Reality seems to have a liberal bias then.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 11:13 AM
5

I'm just knowledgable enough to know I know nothing, and I'm in fact not a happy man, though that is unrelated to this topic. Desperate for what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 07:43 AM
1

Sure. Your call.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 07:35 AM
-1

Yes, sometimes you see, the void stares back. I'm only here to warn you though, the path you are supposedly taking is nonsensical, the path you are actually taking is sad in a "you are chopping the tree under yourself" or "self fulfilling prophecy" way. In the end, for me, it doesn't really make any difference, whether or not you take what was told you and leave this foolish endeavor or not. It can only change your circumstances. You are effectively arguing against your interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 07:03 AM
1

You being more impactful, would be better for me. You see, if you are an "asozial" entitled misogynist and you help people become that, then you are impactfully shrinking my competition. Alas, it is just you shouting into the void, but every small step matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:45 AM
6

Oh you... please do leave the dating market. It will indeed fix a lot of problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:34 AM
2

It does have its basis in fact. Really nice, that this is something that is absolutely measurable, yet you didn't post any tangible data. Let me help: https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2013/08/men-self-esteem https://www.management-issues.com/news/6743/why-men-really-feel-threatened-by-successful-women/ https://psychology-spot.com/men-are-threatened-by-smart-women/ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167215599749?etoc= (Article about it: https://www.acsh.org/news/2015/10/30/are-me…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:22 AM
1

You are provoking with facts, as the saying goes here. I really like, that none of the commenters even attempted to answer with actual studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 06:10 AM
6

Nice opinion, did a youtuber gave it to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 09:20 AM
4

I think this post was written by a 15 years old or someone genuinely clueless (which is worse).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 05:59 AM
1

That is it? Not really strong legs for such a claim. Attractiveness is extremely subjective and changes from people to people. Your prediction is based on your preferences and the limited information you receive. Given your opinions, it is easy to guess from where. Mostly other men sharing your ideas that is. Your numbers are baseless nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 11:14 PM
-1

And from which body orifice did you pull this information out of and how does this relate to what I've said?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 09:12 AM
0

How many times does it have to be said, that attraction is extremely subjective? Seriously. Yeah, everybody likes good looking people. Good looking people to them, duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:00 PM
1

You are somewhat misunderstanding what this means. 1) yes, a lot of women are single for extended periods of times, because there is a lack of men they would settle with. That is one of the points of "the bar is in hell". They get crushes at the same rate as you do, but often the crushes turn out to be not worth their time. I'm not insisting that the same thing can't happen to men, but abusive relationships happen more often than not because of men. 2) different contexts. I do understand why you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 04:56 AM

Where do you even get an idea like this? What information do you base this opinion on? Because this sure sounds like rectally sourced information.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:20 AM

"ugly" is extremely relative, ugly for you doesn't matter because I don't want to be attractive to you, becoming shorter would mean one step closer to strike a relationship with a taller woman and though I'm already confident and charming, more is always welcome. I see this as an absolute win. I would become like a friend of mine, who is a confident, charming, short dude, with a smokin' hot, tall, goth witch girlfriend(not that I'm complaining about my current relationship status because it is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 01:38 PM
2

Though this could be just a form of bias from you, I do note that so far I've uncovered information, that being in good terms with other women is generally considered a green flag. If you are in good terms with women in general, it indicates that you can be trusted among them and that you do view them as partners. I had women who confused my girlfriend for just a friend approach me, like just out of the blue.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:58 AM
0

Tldr, that sounds like a lot of insecurity. I don't mean this as an insult. Like, I genuinely think you should go to therapy or get help. What you are saying is honestly worrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:28 PM
0

No, I would not tell them that, because talking about sexual assault cases and statistics is not "basing their personality" around statistics. It would be plainly incorrect. I'm also kind of disgusted by what you have said. Like, bruh, ew. Also, this is an elaborate way for you to tell us you can't befriend women or think of them as anything else than objects of your affection. Don't project your deficienscies and insecurities on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:02 AM
2

Ehm. No. It seems to me you lack even a surface level knowledge about feminism. Please refrain, from getting informed on feminism, from just malicious contrarians and grifters.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:05 PM
3

Not really, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:43 AM
5

I dont know how much I should simplify what I've told you, for you to understand, that a comment about a specific topic, is a comment about that specific topic and not about another specific topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:45 AM
4

I don't know how you managed to mental gymnast your way from me commenting about incomplete data on high divorce rates, to sexual assault stats, because that is a completely different matter. The only way it is relevant here, is how it influences the divorce rate, because among other things women can leave abusive relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:19 AM
2

A succesful marrige is not the exception. Also, if you already think it will fail, that significantly boosts the chances that it will indeed fail. These statistics also, don't account deeper for the "why" of the issue. You should take a look at that more deeply. Spoiler alert, it is in large part women being able to leave abusive relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:16 AM
6

Don't base your personality around statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:14 AM
3

Sex is a want, arguably intimacy for many people is a need, however the problem usually lies with the accompanying statements about what should women do to serve these supposed "needs". You, ironically built a strawman of "women" supposedly claiming that this claim automatically means a proposal for sexual slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:33 PM
8

Don't take your history and data from tiktok videos and stereotypes folks, because this will be the result. The information you are giving is not "rough" as much as it is underbaked, half-assed, nonsensical slop. Honestly, I could just demand sources, and your whole thing would collapse on itself. In fact, I do just that, and ask you, to start presenting sources. But a few caveats Your "historical" analogy, is nearly completely wrong. Where did you get the "10 000 BC" and "polyamorous hunter gat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:17 AM
0

The red pill is an ideology, that sells you uselsess nonsense, then sells you why it doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:25 AM
1

I don't know what to tell you man. It led me, a fat neurodivergent neckbeard learn enough social stuff, to make reliable friends and to being laid. Making yourself better, taking some punches to the face, standing up, going forward, learning and experiencing new things, with a sufficiently healthy mindset helps a lot. Don't think you are only here to stagnate and things will never improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 09:21 PM
0

I agree that you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 11:51 AM
0

The only point I can agree to in this state, is that you are wrong. Mostly cuz' you apparently lack any basic personal knowledge with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 10:40 AM
3

There is. And beauty standards just mean, basically something that you can sell to a relative plurality of people. Individuals also have wildly different preferences. Ask 2 people what they prefer, you receive 3 answers. 99.9% of humans have a symmetrical face. Saying "people prefer symmetrical face" literally just means humans prefer human faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 11:18 PM
1

I've found you are completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:55 PM
3

Beauty standards are a great example why it is subjective. Because of how significantly they constantly change from time, place and people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 10:54 PM
1

It is not true AI. It is a language algorythm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:28 PM
4

I mean, basically everything you have said is wrong cuz: Human attraction is subjective and can't be put on an objective list You seemingly know nothing about how women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:01 PM
5

Hypergamy is unsunstantiated nonsense. Will "AI" powered dolls exists? They already do. Where it will lead I'm less certain about, because what we see is not true AI and requires massive computing powers, and currently we are at a computing power bottleneck. For the majority of humans however, AI will not be able to act as a substitite, and will not even be required. Simply you are exaggarating how difficult it is to find a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:44 PM
4

The red pill is made up by grifters profiting off the misery of others. Its "analysisi of relationship dynamics" is baseless nonsense. You as well as red pill generalises and mischaracterises feminism. Like, completely. I call it into question whether or not any of the red pill crowd ever interacted honestly with it in the first place. "Feminists" led no crackdown. It was the red piller crowd that attempted to violently push out women and people who think differently from different spaces. I'm s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:01 PM
3

yeah, pretty much.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 07:55 PM
0

The top comment starts with "hero". Sure as shit it ain't about the "mom". And? First comment praises the man, and says that this probably happened because the woman was in dire health condittion, frankly one of the most rational comments. This is not enough to establish double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:49 PM
1

Saying that the person has a mental condition is not the same defending them. I didn't really see much "defense" under this post either. It is just a (logical) rationalisation, on why did the horrific thing we have seen happened. You can probably find a post in 2 minutes of search where something horrific happened or nearly happened because of a man, and people will talk about how he probably had mental helath issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:20 AM
-1

...exact same, but with a man
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:13 AM
0

This exact same, but with a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:54 AM
0

If you were honest, you would be adressing my points instead of whatever you are doing now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:25 AM
-2

I didn't say you did. I just told that you are doing some real nonsense there. Your kneejerk defensive reaction, without adressing my comment suggests that your position was dishonest to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:22 AM
0

Why would that prove OP right? Op is complaining about a supposed double standard. However it is a correct statement. It doesn't matter if that person is a man or a woman, putting themselves in a situation like that, suggests a need for immediate phsychiatric help
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:20 AM
-2

Wow. If mental gymnastics were an olympic sport you would be a gold medalist for sure. I pointed out how OPs starting position is dishonest, and his speculation is pointless and doesn't hold any weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:18 AM
1

Pointless to speculate and your position doesn't hold true First of all, this is probably a case of mental illnes where the supposed "mom" needs hospitalization. Second, you are already lying about the top comments, because they are praising the man, who saved them. Third, plenty of people, even under the top comment are angry with the "mom". The perpetrator was not a man. Instead of baselessly speculating, you should stop lying about what the basis is in the first place and stop taking reddit c…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:01 AM
1

The people I mostly see here trying to dodge accountability, is shitty men, who can't fathom that their behavior and personality can be a pretty important reason why they can't get into a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 04:43 PM
0

Holy mother of "us vs them" mentality. First of all, your argument nearly hits a bullseye but misses the mark. A bunch of men out there, thanks in large part to their personal reasons, are not good partners. And a bunch of women out there complain, that a large amount of men are not good partners. Connect the dots, I'm pretty sure it is not that hard. It is not like a woman can't be a tereible partner, even I can attest to that. I don't understand what is your point however. Like, I do not think…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 12:36 PM
7

What the fuck is a "gender ideology"? It seems to me someone is hit by post-nut clarity a bit too hard. Also, don't just randomly start sending sexual messages to random women you meet, and maybe they will not be that off put by you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 12:29 PM
1

"more" implies larger quantity. First of all, it was they who claimed it, and then you, not me, I just pointed it out. Also, whether or not "more" means that something is quantifiably larger, needs no statistical proof, as it is a question of what a word means, so if you are unsure, you may consult a dictionary. I can't exactly open my brain to show you what I think, but in my opinion writing it down in this instance is sufficient proof that I do in fact think that. Otherwise, generally, you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:01 PM
4

You don't give a fuck so much, you dignified it with an answer. Get a grip. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 10:47 AM
9

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. We should get used to providing proof for wide reaching claims, it would most certainly elevate the conversation. I tend to provide If I'm the one who makes the claims first or if necessarily challenged, and I judge it worth making it. I don't tend to make posts however and most stuff I talk about is subjective anyway. "More" is a quantifiable trend when it comes to relationships. She made reference to a trend, establishing and therefore cla…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:49 AM
7

It isn't as much offending me, as it bothers me that people just say stuff without showing any quantifiable evidence for their claims. Same with the nonsensical posts of redpillers and incels that "women do X". Like, this poster already implies that there is indeed an actual trend, without any evidence. This comes from an internet meme, called (and i kid you not) "Hagmaxxing".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 04:37 AM
6

Darling, you seem to lack basic reading and logical comprehension. First: The question is, whether or not is there a rise in older woman/younger man relationships. As in, is there a trend of these kinds of relationships becoming significantly more common. This trend *can* exist (doesn't mean it does), even if the majority of older women are not into younger men. A trend wouldn't necessarily change "the majority". Example. if among 10 people, 3 like chocolate and 7 don't, then a majority doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 03:19 AM
5

That is also not the question in this instance, it is whether or not there is a trend that shows more relationships where the woman is significantly older, and separate it from the trends of the age gap in relationships closing somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:50 AM
17

I didn't see a single quantitative data that implied this trend. It is you AND your biases talking, until you can show evidence. Just because your echo chamber pushes this narrative, doesn't make that true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 01:04 AM

It is not my bedroom life that determines whether or not this rule is baseless junk. But don't worry, I'm just fine. I'm in a loving relationship, with a woman who asked me out (she was the third that month who indicated their romantic feelings to me)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:48 PM
1

So, "pills" is a way how certain people view the world and people in it, and today it is essentially slang. What people say the "red pill" and "black pill" is complete and utter nonsense. There is however no "blue piller crowd" the same way. Even I just use this flair because i had to pick one. There is no coherent ideology behind it as much as there is a (somewhat) coherent behind red pill and blackpill. These circles just call everyone a blue piller who according to them "refuses to see the tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:19 PM
2

Not really. This hypergamy thing is complete nonsense, far removed from reality. People hooking up with no serious commitment towards each other happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:07 PM
2

You have seen something that you believe proves it, but let me assure you, it is insufficient to establish such a thing based on your personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:28 PM
1

It is neither of those things. It is misogynistic nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:30 PM
0

Lol. No. It is because this "rule" is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:28 PM
5

80/20 rule is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:28 PM
5

Already you are deviating from what was said, because even your colleague said 20%. This is partially because this number is baseless and arbitrary and nobody does it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:09 PM
15

Whatever "red pill" is saying is utter and complete nonsense. "Hypergamy" and "20/80" rule, all complete baseless idiocy cooked up by the hateful, the ignorant and the grifter. It was nonsense back then, it is nonsense now and it will be nonsense in the future. Would it hurt you red pillers to just, i don't know, interact with women more? To put aside this brainrot? They are not a hivemind or a different species.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:51 AM
20

Single parenthood, PARTICULARLY single motherhood because of how women are often disadvantaged in society, is associated heavily with poverty. The problem is mainly lacking social network and not single mothers. Single mothers are also more common, as men are more likely to give up custody. Kids in poverty have less chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 09:47 AM
2

You make less sense with every sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 04:42 AM
13

All edge, no point. Typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:57 AM
4

I don't exactly understand the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:28 PM
4

It is illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:13 PM
2

I arguably mostly disagreed with certain people in the comment section, instead of going through them one by one. Is that perhaps not allowed? What is the point of reporting in this site really? You know, I'm not the one who should police the daily dose of incel circlejerk posting some of the most vile misogynistic nonsense out there. It is really nice for you mods to descend whenever somebody says such frivolous things, that many people in the group have glaring double standards and sexist outb…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:13 PM
2

Oh really? Now you are pulling this card? The absolute circlejerk and horrifyingly misogynistic contents with no intention to debate in good faith can remain, but if someone argues that people in the comment section don't get the post it is going "too far"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 12:11 PM
1

That is complete nonsense. I'm sorry, this is not even a debate, you are either completely delusional or trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:53 AM
1

Believe it or not, there are a lot of people out there who are not actively looking for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:19 PM
2

I doubt that your personal experience is representative enough. My argument is clearly presented, against a certain comment, you may read both again for clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 10:01 AM
0

It does, because that is what chiefly influences the original data, because of the definition the data used to specify single. People get into committed relationships relatively later. Don't get me wrong, there is struggling most certainly, but the commenter lied about the data, because the question was not about who is in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 10:00 AM
3

And that, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 09:27 AM
1

Really funny, how you juggle the words to make it seem like worse than it actually is. It is not 60% of men that are single. 60% of men under the age of 30, by the definition used by the data are single, which means not in a committed relationship(which doesn't mean they don't get laid or on dates, half of them also don't actively seek a relationship). Why do you literally lie about the thing you just wrote down, is beyond me. You leave out other parts of that study including the fact that the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 09:12 AM
1

3rd paragraph, where I specify whomst I talk about. What did i write?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 09:04 PM
1

Again, you should read and understand what I've actually said.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:59 PM
1

I do not think they do. That is blatantly untrue. I'm not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:58 PM
1

Learn to read. That is not what I've said.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:57 PM
0

I didn't say "how men suck at sex". I said there is a "not entirely baseless" stereotype and talked about those certain men among other things. Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:56 PM
2

Sigh. Though that might occasionally happen, that is probably not the root issue. As I've talked about in relation to the op's post, the dullness comes from how some men, are in fact so lacking in empathy that not only do they underperform, they literally don't notice it. Your "blackpill" view about relationship dynamics is nonsensical. It is just a fact, communication is an extremely important part of sex and relationships, and to communicate best you need to be empathetic with the other. Howev…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:18 PM
0

I naively believe words still have meaning. Yes, there is a stereotype, that a lot of men are bad in bed that is not entirely baseless. Not once did I say, men are inherently bad in bed. This perception exists, among other reasons and complication, for things that I talked about. Just because someone is a man, they are not inherently bad in bed, just as much women, just for the fact that they are a woman, aren't better. Inherently therefore, no. However, there are certain factors which make it s…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 11:44 AM
1

I don't think that men are inherently worse in bed than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 11:27 AM
-3

I didn't, you should also, read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 10:34 AM
-3

That is not just what I've said. I would strongly advise you, to read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 09:23 AM
-3

That is no....sigh...no.Certain people probably think that way, but that is not an overall true statement. There is however a not entirely baseless stereotype, that a lot of men are bad in bed. There are a lot of men out there who shun ideas like empathy towards others and think women are "conquests" and "trophies" to be won, not partners. They are with women, because toxic masculinity measures a man's worth partially by how many women he was with, instead of you know, doing something personal a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 09:03 AM

Foreplay is an integral part of the experience. It is important for men too, it elevates the whole thing. No foreplay usually means several times worse sex overall. Sex is also something you do together. Your partner's enjoyment is an integral part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:46 AM
2

A solution to what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:18 AM
1

I imagine you think currently how deep myterious and intellectual you sound...you don't. You are spewing incoherent nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 05:04 AM
2

Nah, you just don't make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 04:55 AM
0

What the actual hell are you talking about? No genuinely, like, what does that even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 04:28 AM
8

Women are not rewards. What do you know about what most women desire?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 02:42 PM
1

Men would do anything for a woman, like slay dragons and rescue them, except be honest. (Sarcasm)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:49 AM

I'm very sorry that happened to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 09:27 AM

The reason why people assume things, is how you worded it. Yes is not always yes, and yes is not yes to everything. To put it simply, the yes is not absolute, but the closest thing to it is Enthusiastic consent, which means an explicit given approval to something both parties are informed and enthusiastic about. That is it. It is just the best way to do it and to make sure no bad things happen. No sarcasm or potential lapses of judgement, or misread signals. You don't want to misread or misunder…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 08:57 AM

Okay, that is neither what this means, nor how this works. There are numerous (legally recognized) ways, where a "yes" doesn't necessarily mean yes. Here are a few examples done under pressure. Consent done to anything under pressure, be it sex, contract, testimony etc, can and will be null and void. Pressure can mean psychological and physical. under the influence of mind altering drugs or other substances, like alcohol. People legally can't consent under heavy influence, or depending on jurast…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 08:17 AM

Dude, being a misogynist is an extremely important and deciding trait, that people in incel circles more often than not share. If you are hateful towards the people you are trying to get together with, it is just common sense to think that is the core of all of your supposed dating problems. It is also plainly disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 11:03 AM

Extreme and unrelated examples from times long gone under extremely different circumstances. Also, there are women who are horrible and are attracted to similarly horrible people. Sure, a crusader had a wife, feel free to have medieval views on relationships and see how girls will flock to you. Maybe things have changed? Priorities shifted, and in the "dating market" people who are remarkably not hateful towards women offer a better relationship? Being a decent person is free and not at all unre…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 10:54 AM

There is not being perfect and making mistakes, and there is being an asshole. Nobody is expecting you to act moral a 100% of the time. But they do expect you to not be an asshole. I constantly make mistakes, I accidentally offended people, said and did things that would probably make a twitter mob come after me some day. Yet, "not being reasonably nice enough IRL" and "being misogynistic" are 2 accusations that would not really stick. "Yes he thinks women are lesser beings, and behaves terribly…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 10:26 AM
9

You have either never married or you had a messy divorce. Of course, the woman or women were responsible for it, It couldn't have been you. (/S to the last sentence)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 09:10 AM
3

How about we play hide and seek. I hide and you seek professional help, because this isn't normal what you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 07:17 AM
1

This post is nonsense, but putting aside that, you should seek help OP. You post distressing stuff and probably should go to a therapist or to a hospital for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:22 AM
3

How is this exactly a debate? This is nonsense. Feminism is not even about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 04:20 PM

Meh, they wouldn't want to wear a condom, however no woman wants to be with most of these basement dwelling incels anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 07:01 AM
5

What are you even talking about? Paper abort? You mean to tell me, that you should not be responsible for your own actions to the detriment of other people? Absolutely not, no matter how you twist it, you can't buzzword your way out of personal responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:59 AM
0

5.5% is a rough avarage number by one metric. Other, less broad definitions may make it closer to around 2% or even less than 1%. There is plenty of statistical evidence that it happens rarely. Lack of conviction rates show a critical and systematic problem with the criminal justice system, that often can't investigate properly or can't protect the victims. It is partially, because the filed cases, depressingly rarely result in arrests. Also, a significant amount of victims don't turn to the pol…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:35 PM
-1

In this situation, 94.5% of such reports are true. Women, who came forward, who were assaulted and who managed to gather the courage to come foward. Why are you focusing, completely hyperfixating on the possible evil of a select few, when there is the glaring evil of the thousands who suffered such henious crimes. False accusations happen extremely rarely, but they are a rare exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 04:40 PM
0

What feminists? You are throwing around your nonsensical buzzwords, but in a world of evidence, this literally means nothing. The core problem is that what you are saying is either unsubstantiated nonsense or useless buzzwords. You sound...not like a smart person. Maybe this is enough for the half witted circlejerk that is the so called "red piller" crowd, but not for anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:34 AM
6

Don't see study (can't imagine why, maybe cuz' what you are saying is nonsense) What feminists claimed what and where? Are these "feminists" in the room with us right now? Assuming the 5.5% is true, that would nearly align it with the false accusation rates of other crimes. You are more likely to be a victim of such an assault than be falsely accused, you are fearmongering to suppress women coming out against their attackers. You are malicious and dishonest. I'm honestly nausiated by you. Ew.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:51 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 12:04 PM
-4

I mostly spend time outside work. Hobbies, common programs, sometimes me and the gals (and lads) head to our favourite gamer/tabletop bar, ttrpg sessions, or just on our own time etc
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 10:25 AM
-12

They aren't. I can just be another guy who just about manages to jump this imaginary and quite low bar, it is not difficult. But I'm not that guy. I "jump" much higher. Or as a few friends of mine put it "single handedly raising the bar" actually. A woman who gets to know me afterall, might never want anything less ever again. 🤷 I had more women ask me out than I can count at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 08:28 AM
-21

I'm not exactly sure what do you want to know. As I experience it(as a man), the bar for men is in hell. Many men are incapable of basic things, so when you do those things and spend enough time in the company of the other sex, eventually people will start to like you. It requires patience, because not everything is going to happen instantly. Now, I'm not the one who tends to asks others out and whenever I interact with women, I don't tend to seek more than friendship. I like to have friends amo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 07:53 AM
3

Very good, you managed to google some. I applaud your effort. Probably this helps establish to you that there is no singular "feminist theory" and rather it is a collection of works and theories by different people through more than several centuries, roughly all working towards a goal of achieving equality/equity among the sexes though having stark differences and often advocating for contradicting ideals, so you CAN be aware how "That would include the entirety of feminist theory" is a nonsens…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 02:03 PM
1

Me asking for evidence to back up your [not you personally, the group you belong to, but apparently you are a bit slow to understand context] claims, has nothing self-righteous about it. As well as calling out naked discriminatory statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 12:30 PM
1

Which phylosophical works of feminism did you read? Can you name a single work or author? The theories they present? Name me just one actual theory and give me a citation on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 12:29 PM
0

I'm pretty sure if an opinion has no evidence behind it and is sexist, then it clearly shows its inferiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 11:25 AM
1

There are many, safe and non-judgemental avenues to express frustration in my opinion. There are however many opinions that don't deserve that kind of protection and are trash. The problematic statement isn't "I think today's dating culture is toxic". It is "women today are shallow and only go for XYZ" or any flavour of blaming the entire other sex for some magical opinion they all hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 09:46 AM
2

I was called all those things by both people who wanted nothing and by people who were down bad. I do not think it is a turn off in general. Maybe you should communicate better aboud bedroom stuff or maybe you were just unlucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:37 PM

Do you get your information from boomer memes? Genuinely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 05:09 AM
2

So that contentless nonsense is allowed, but me dismissing it as such isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 05:06 AM
-1

Not taking women's advice on what women want is maidenless behavior and just about the worst thing you can do if you want to have a functional relationship of any sort with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:51 AM

>Complains about my debate skills >Insults me personally At least I engaged with your nonsensical points, instead of calling you anything. It is not like you provided much, given how you just asserted stuff without any form of proof or flexibility and I suspect with no actual willingness to engage properly. Did your high school crush dump you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:09 AM

I need not to waste more energy on nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:00 AM

Nonsense. Nonsense based on nonsense You have gone too far Did your gf dump you or something? Is this a vacuum cleaner commercial from the 50's?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 11:07 PM
1

Just to clarify "broke" in this context means lacking money?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:04 PM
1

No, it is perfect advice. Don't chase someone who is not into you, it doesn't worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 10:29 AM
1

Everybody views the world through their own lense and interprets it through their own personal biases. With no way to verify it really, in terms of evidence, these anecdotal stories don't really worth anything. Even if someone fully believes what they say, it is just their, relatively limited interpretation (this goes for every side, yes even you, dear reader) Added to this, the fact that both red and blackpill ideologies are coming from a disengenuous position and are based on nonsense and sele…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:26 AM
9

"Feminists" "whine" about violent crimes being committed against them and not nearly enough being done. The victim is not responsible for the crime being perpetrated against them. You know what is beneficial for society? You openly displaying your red flags like that, so we can all see how much of a terrible person you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:14 AM
17

Friends are always a benefit. They are just friends, friends I spend time with, friends I like, friends who are there for me. I do not have a utilitarian view on friendship. Nevertheless there are some specific benefits. I tended to find in female friends more keen on having deep, personal and emotional conversations. Women tend to offer a different perspective compared to men on a host of different topics, perspectives that made me quantifiably understand my enviroment better. Listen to women, …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 06:52 PM
11

"sexually disposessed of the world, Unite. There is nothing to lose but our virginities" - JReg I mean, your entire argument is based on a strawman and gets worse as it goes forward. Human relationships can't and should not be regulated even remotely like how we regulate markets or tax people. You should be accountable and responsible for your actions. Generally, Incels choose to be who they are, and not there because of aspects outside their control.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 10:09 AM
10

What? That we shouldn't take you seriously? That this is some nonsensical allegory to penis size, even though that also misses how vaginas work?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:59 AM
13

I do not think even porn is the culprit here(not IRL anyways). Like, this is some extreme ignorance, trolling or a fetish thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:55 AM
25

I second this, what the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:51 AM
3

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 12:11 AM
2

Your experience is lacking but it is up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 12:21 PM
2

None of the series I've just mentioned are children's cartoons. They are specifically not made for children.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 11:39 AM
1

Depends, there are a lot that aren't. For a start you could try with fandoms popular among the online lgbtq community and artists. No, I'm not joking. Helluva Boss/Hazbin Hotel is a good start. And there are a lot of weird boyz fixated on fictional women. However, not all of them and most importantly, people usually have the capability to distinguish between fiction and reality. You have a markedly higher chance of encountering people who are not completely straight, not completely sane but most…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 11:11 AM
2

Arts, games, acting, writing, stuff like this. Artist communities tend to be broadly in equal measure filled by both men and women. I'm not really a party or convention goer person I don't even really drink, but joining groups, it is always fun. It is fine not to know that much either, you can always ask, and there will be a lot of people passionately telling you about their hobbies and what they think about what and be supportive of your artistic endeavours.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 09:08 AM
6

That is a pretty broad question with multiple interpretations. But very basically, I have hobbies which also a lot of women enjoy. We share in it, talk about stuff, eventually talk about personal matters, I always make sure to listen, to remember, to show signs of appriciation, just for kindness's sake. I very rarely or ever actually looking to date. Then usually after a few weeks or months, things develop. Every time, it was the women who took initiative. I take them to a nice date, something d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 11:04 PM
1

I do engage with it sadly (why even), I provided quite concrete points. I do not need to make up a conclusion, "AI" is not an authority on anything and you can make it say anything, there is a reason why AI chatbots are so frowned upon in professional circles, because laypeople often don't understand them and they are a rampant source of misinformation. These bots are dumb as a rock, and have no capacity to comprehend or contextualise information to the degree a human can, otherwise we would lit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:48 PM
2

Can you read? Because based on this response you have raised doubts in me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:42 PM
3

There is no more appropriate response to this word spaghetti that you have just placed here. Chatbots are not intelligent, they are language algorythms. You can essentially make it say anything, and it has no capacity to understand human emotions. It is not an authority on anything, not even on itself. You make me concerned about people's ability to separate reality from fiction or even comprehend what they are dealing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:36 PM
5

No. What the fuck. Get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 04:30 PM
2

Variety of reasons some without much explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 02:35 PM

You were being annoying and what you call debating seems like just you trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:19 AM
6

Not really and the modern enviroment opens the possibilities for other arrangement. Evolutionarily speaking, a stay at home dad is just as succesful as a non stay at home dad, so this argument is nonsensical. Whatever works, works. You should mind your own business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:16 AM
15

The idea that women should stay home and men provide for the family is backwards. Whatever suits the family best. Whatever we were wired for, we no longer live in that enviroment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 01:13 AM
1

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 03:50 PM
0

Yeah, it do be like that. I'm sorry that happend to you. This comment section honestly says it all, there is a chronic inability to see the world from the other's perspective and if not agree, at least understand it. "I would have done something.." no, you wouldn't have, and even if you would have, it doesn't matter, what you WOULD have done doesn't change what happened and isn't helpful "Women don't allow us to show how great we are personally, they only care about looks" They do see what kind …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 11:15 AM

Red pill doesn't offer self improvement. It offers loneliness, bitterness, made up problems and made up solutions. It is preached by conmen, who don't care about you. A "red pill" individual, is a perpetually bitter and angry person
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 10:05 AM
-1

I listened to women, when it came to what women want. I live in a stable and loving relationship, have tons of friends, and actually have to contend with constant flirting attempts by other women. I'm not really taller than avarage, I'm overweight and I'm a nerd who plays video games, collects miniatures and has a neckbeard.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 08:36 PM
-1

Not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 08:33 PM

I neither found nor heard a single positive thing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 07:25 PM
-2

There is a perception, that the avarage guy is a terrible boyfriend, because the avarage guy, is inattentive, doesn't listen and too self centered, who thinks giving basic human decency is a privilige and not a given thing. (among other things) Women, do have to face ridiculous standards. Men reject women, for things like the woman having a higher degree or earn more than him, for being too independent, for wanting an equal partnership, for not comforming to very specific standards of beauty and…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 11:14 AM
0

Listening to women what they want landed me in stable and loving relationships and with good friends. People give advice, it is up to us what we do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 07:44 AM
-7

No, it is quite right that the bar is in hell for men. Maybe you should listen to women when it comes to what women want. Men, thanks to how a significant chunk of male society tends to view women, relationships and how men should behave, create men who are undesirable in dating on the long term. You also undereatimate the often ridiculous standards women have to face in dating. Dating in itself is not that difficult to achieve for either of the sexes, having a good relationship, now that is whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 07:40 AM
1

I don't really see what the point is. Even if we assume you are right here, which is already a leap of faith, I don't get what you want to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 10:04 AM
2

You are severely misrepresenting what the article is about and make conclusions that the article never did. Very typical. In fact I would say, most of what you have said is unsupported and whacky nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 06:13 AM
1

"Females of Reddit - What is the sexiest thing a plus size gamer gentleman has told you that has made you want to immediately have sex with him and be his girlfriend?"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 11:54 PM
-1

AI relationships as of now, are sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:09 AM
2

If they don't experience an orgasm, that is more often than not, the partner's fault. Your's. There is also, much more to sex than the physical and much more to the physical than the basics.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 01:28 PM
1

I don't know. Why was the civil rights movement mainly concernerned with the rights of people of color and not with other issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 07:39 AM
1

They don't. That is nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 07:35 AM
2

I think there is a difference in perspective based on a lot of things, among them a difference imposed by culture. So, to be good in bed, is much more than...being physically good. It requires a certain level of empathy, attentiveness and good communication skills, things where men are often lacking for one reason or another (discouraged or frowned upon traits, often barely communicating with women outside of attempts at relationships etc). For men, sex is often just that. Sex. Meaningless or ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 07:59 AM
27

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/24 03:24 AM
1

What? Okay, uhm. No Definately no ...what? Also, if you are friends with someone because you want something from them, is it really you being friends with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 09:16 AM

You seem to misunderstand the gist of the advice. You can approach women with the intent of dating them, but be mindful and appropriate about it and take no as an answer. Don't pretend to befriend women if you don't view them as friends 3 and 4. What? I mean, most of what I've seen and what i tend to recommend is pick up hobbies where you interact with a lot more women. I mean, sure, don't pretend to like something just because you want to get laid, but otherwise go and find hobbies and join soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 08:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter