TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LikesTacos Archive

View 4 posts and 224 comments by LikesTacos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you read that from the article you are suffering from confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:09 AM
1

Not according to any of the statistics you left me to find on my own. Here is one There are differences but the number of single fathers is too small to make the grand declarations that you have made. I fully believe having two parents is better for the kid and the science backs me on this. Your statistics (none provided) are based on the results of the misandric system. Single fathers do not receive the support that single mothers do and I am guessing that due to the misandric court system that…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:49 PM
1

Now take all of that and compare it to the performance of kids in shared parenting situations which is what I have maintained throughout our discourse.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:10 PM
1

So instead of responding with actual statistics that you are saying exist it's more rhetoric. Aren't mothers remarrying? It sounds like you are completely making things up to justify your worldview. You say outcomes are worse especially for boys but have not provided anything other than your words. Just point me to these statistics and I'll look for myself.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:11 PM
1

I think I'll be okay.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 04:07 PM
57

Better than the alternative of staying.
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 12:42 PM
1

My daughter and son also found it amusing but exposing kids to flawed logic and misrepresentation of facts no matter how amusing has no place in a public school curriculum.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:06 AM
1

USA. Public. Liberal state. Conservative section of the liberal state.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:03 AM
1

There's a reason child care is typically a minimum wage job. Almost anybody can do it.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:02 AM
1

What statistics? Everything I have ever read confirm that children with their father in their life do better in life.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 11:01 AM
1

Their mom is a feminist. I don't see that working out.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:55 AM
1

I'm in upstate NY. Thanks for the info. I'll find out what they are currently studying.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:54 AM
1

I would like more than your thinking that it isn't the entire system that is biased against men. Do you have any proof for what you are supposing? I can only provide a first-hand account as statistics are not kept on why settlements are reached. As I stated, it shouldn't be based on which parent spends more time with the kid. A parent that is willing to sacrifice so their kid has better opportunity and resources is still every bit of a parent as the "nurturer." Caring for children is not difficu…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 08:02 PM
19

My kids know. My daughter was asking me if she could heckle her today. I told her to go ahead just make sure they call me and not their mom.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:52 PM
5

Fair enough. This is the way I was kinda leaning anyway. My kids know what's up but it isn't being presented as "radical political ideologies" which is where I have issue.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:51 PM
11

Bang Ding Ow?
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 07:44 PM
1

If by amicably you mean the lawyers settle after telling the father's they have no chance at custody you are correct. Nobody can dispute custody without an attorney willing to dispute it. Good luck finding one. Of course, the courts should assume 50/50 unless there are mitigating circumstances. A parent sacrificing time with their kids for the better overall quality of life of their kids should not harm their parenting time when a divorce happens. The single mother experiment has failed our kids…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:45 PM
3

I had to interview five lawyers before I found one who told me I could get 50/50 shared custody. The first four told me I had no chance. It cost $30,000 but in the end, I was awarded equal parenting. It is not "who requests it more" but who can request it more. Currently, it is assumed that the mother will be awarded physical custody and the lawyers are there to negotiate how much money she will receive for her efforts. Reform of the family court system is needed. Feminists are denying children …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:15 PM
3

Full Kilt!
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:04 PM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:10 PM
2

$30000 for 50/50 custody. She is considered the "custodial parent" because she makes less money. I was just ordered to pay full child support (the full amount as if I had no physical custody, the maximum allowed.) I get the expense to appeal that decision only to be heard by the same judge that ordered it in the first place. Unless I hear a state, I believe RealMom4 is a troll.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:09 PM
1

Smells like teen spirit.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:06 PM
5

It was HER turn!
/r/MGTOW31/05/18 07:13 PM
1

Did she eat him?
/r/MGTOW31/05/18 04:28 PM
2

I had to travel to England to call my mate a cunt. Best trip ever.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 08:07 PM
1

Maybe encourage women to take less government resources to close that gap.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:05 PM
1

He signed it. Didn't have to. I don't know anything about him, but he did do something.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 01:26 PM
2

Matt Lauer did nothing wrong.
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 11:44 AM
7

Wider doorways?
/r/MGTOW23/04/18 07:02 PM
0

If only I could. I hate this fucking state. My kids are here so I won't be leaving anytime soon.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:27 PM
2

My senator is Republican but I believe this would fall under judicial review not legislative. I agree that I don't have a snowball's chance in hell but at some point, men need to start talking openly about the bias. I've reached my breaking point with the system and am telling my attorney that all options need to be on the table. My district is having a special election on Tuesday. One of the candidates was campaigning door to door over the weekend. I asked him if he was a feminist. When he said…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 10:40 AM
2

Best of luck to you. I hope your new lawyer is competent and the judge (if it goes to trial) has been divorced and lost custody of their children. I don't really wish that upon the judge but, a judge that understands the implications of their ruling can be a great asset.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:42 PM
2

I will do that in my letter to my state representative. Our senate is actually conservative so I think the issue would be more likely to face headwinds in the house.I really do not believe anything will be done. After hearing about the men in England protesting judges houses, I could not remain silent. the more people that make noise, the more that can be accomplished hopefully. Luckily for the judge, I now can no longer afford recreational activities so I can use my free time to picket her home…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:33 PM
2

I have not. I am meeting with my attorney on Tuesday to try and get this overturned and will discuss it with him. Another unnecessary legal expense for me to have to try and get the latest order vacated.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:27 PM
5

Thanks for the response. I am glad that you are able to see the situation as I described it. I definitely made a couple clarity errors that I need to clean up before sending it to my state representative (holding a special election next week.) I wrote this when I was stressed and angry and my proof-reading left a little to be desired.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:23 PM
2

I don't recall the program that gives her a free attorney. I am certain it is income based but a lot of things are income based and refuse service to men.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 03:20 PM
2

After rereading it, I was not clear with that statement. I was referring to my original child support obligation of $750 per month as compared to my new child support obligation of $1616 per month. Thanks for your feedback.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:25 PM
1

That is what I noticed in the article. The author repeatedly insinuated that the protests would turn violent at any moment. Even the police issued a statement about if anybody feels threatened, etc. Bullshit.
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 05:50 PM
4

You mean unwanted by women. I know that men can not want them too but we really don't get a say in the matter. I'm more of the fuck everybody mindset.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 06:36 PM
4

As a lifelong Republican I switched my party affiliation to Democrat so I could vote against her twice. Fuck Hillary.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:58 PM
7

They also reserve the right to change their mind at any time in the future.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:55 PM
8

It also works in reverse. If you want to keep the kid your vote doesn't count. So either way men are screwed. I prefer that everybody gets screwed equally.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 04:42 PM
9

So we have everything but men only. Typical.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:21 PM
18

Not with that attitude it won't.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:19 PM
33

Not really useless. Her cowardice alerted the real security guard to the presence of a threat.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 06:27 PM
12

Everybody is a fuckable object. Anything is a fuckable object. This has fuckall to do with societies view of women. There are no victims when people fuck inanimate objects.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:24 PM
5

But in prison a guard could bring her cigarettes and candy bars. Alpha males indeed.
/r/MGTOW16/01/18 05:52 PM
1

#metoo
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:08 PM
15

Almost always a female social worker.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:08 PM
7

They even killed off her hot sister in the beginning. All they had to do was reverse their casting.
/r/MGTOW09/01/18 04:52 PM
5

/r/PussyPass
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/17 07:34 PM
1

Jilling?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/17 04:50 PM
4

Ewww. No. You have boobs? Make vomiting noises. I just threw up in my mouth a little.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:27 PM
7

#SalemWitchTrials
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:04 PM
8

The old face smush.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 05:32 PM
0

In my divorce they split assets 50/50 and debts were split according to income.
/r/askTRP06/11/17 08:08 PM
10

Doesn't say a BJ is out of the question.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/10/17 04:44 PM
5

And there are companies making a lot of money by lobbying cities to install traffic cameras.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:17 PM
15

Good bot.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 02:21 PM
6

This is why I have a gay doctor.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:37 PM
2

Good Bot
/r/MGTOW15/08/17 06:56 PM
27

and you are a deadbeat dad pig abusive asshole if you publicly disagree with it FTFY
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:43 PM
36

Should have. The court system often times has to deal out punishment for children with bad parents.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/17 01:44 PM
16

I'm assuming it is pre-tax money also. This means you get to pay 1/3 of your gross income to her every month AFTER you have paid all of the taxes on it. So you would be paying close to if not over 50% of your take home pay to the deadbeat mother.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 08:41 PM
37

I used to do drugs too. I still do but I used to too.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 06:11 PM
29

Alcohol is a drug. She may be onto something.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/17 05:31 PM
-5

Except the one from the screenshot and the website they reference. Other than those two sources, feminism has been screaming from the rooftops that sexism can exist to either gender. These are obviously the only two examples ever.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 08:11 PM
1

Is she?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:45 PM
5

I am an older guy. I was going to try and comment on 1 and 2 and realized that I have different experiences than everybody else and really don't feel comfortable in giving my opinion as it is only my opinion and somebody can probably give better insight. As for number three do not try to lower your sex drive. It is what makes you a man. Lowering your drive will probably lower your testosterone. Be a man. Go your own way, if that is the way you choose, but don't neuter yourself to accomplish it. …
/r/MGTOW03/04/17 08:47 PM
8

That 11% is calculated before taxes but paid after the taxes are paid on it. For example a 35% tax rate on $100,000 income would be paying $11,000 per year (based on your 11%) when they are actually bringing home $65,000. This makes the effective rate of child support about 17%. I'm also assuming that the 11% is for one child. The math gets ugly quickly when more children are added.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 08:51 PM
8

If feminism has taught me anything it's that we need to teach blacks not to steal.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:24 PM
1

Only awarding alimony for at fault divorce is a terrible idea that would only force couples into court. Splitting everything 50/50 by default takes away the reason to drag out divorce proceedings. Adding in extra money for at-fault divorce puts it right back into court. The breadwinner (I.E. Men) end up paying more for their attorneys and usually end up paying a significant potion (if not all) for their ex's attorneys as well.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:43 PM
5

A poorly implemented bad idea.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:37 PM
1

It has nothing to do with who took time off work. It is based solely on what one person makes vs. what the other person makes. Duration of payments can vary based on length of marriage and the legal jurisdiction (Country/State)
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:36 PM
1

Depends on the country/state.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:35 PM
2

This isn't true. Alimony is not based on a person giving up their career for the marriage it is based on the difference between two people's income.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 05:34 PM
1

I didn't mean that to be directed at you. It's always the argument when discussing divorce court not favoring women.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:41 PM
8

Nobody should be forced to be financially responsible for a child that isn't theirs.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:52 PM
6

I hate the "doesn't have to do anything with being a man or a woman" reasoning. If the people affected are 99.9% male it has EVERYTHING to do with being a man.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:34 PM
9

He was deceived into providing for the child initially and when the truth came out he no longer wants to be financailly responsible. Adoptions are typically voluntary with all parties knowing upfront all aspects of the adoption.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:31 PM
2

Couldn't you just buy condoms at the store?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:27 PM
3

If the father passes away the child would get Social Security payments. If where abouts are unknown the state would pay.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:26 PM
1

According to goodreads it is. I give them a lot more credence than HuffPo.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 02:07 PM
452

“When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.” ― Thomas Sowell
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:09 PM
5

yes
/r/MensRights20/01/17 08:05 PM
149

Very few women are harmed. Not a crisis.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 09:43 PM
3

What woman isn't willing to suck dick?
/r/askTRP16/11/16 03:46 PM
1

Depends on the judge. I live in a rural county in upstate NY and had a "pleasant" experience when dealing with Family court. I say pleasant meaning the best I could hope for. Family court is a shitshow by design and the deck is stacked against you. What has your lawyer said?
/r/askTRP15/11/16 08:12 PM
3

He should get full custody of the child.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:39 PM
5

This is so true. It was a conversation of oneupsmanship. He never said he actually grabbed women by the pussy but the media and the DNC tried to spin it that way and the narrative stuck.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:32 PM
0

Yes?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 06:14 PM
3

His girlfriend hit him first.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:47 PM
1

Just pointing out that the answer to your question was provided. I don't have a dog in this fight.
/r/MGTOW13/09/16 03:41 PM
5

And what problem is that? Dealing only with absolutes with violence
/r/MGTOW12/09/16 08:25 PM
1

If you are going to leave, talk to a lawyer first. Don't tell anybody. If you want custody/shared custody of your kid, talk to enough lawyers to find one that tells you that you will get that and how to go about it. I interviewed five lawyers before finding one that said I would get shared custody.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:31 PM
1

Now that you bring it up. Let's not forget the burden on the entire military benefit system (which is already strained) as a whole for soldiers that were not needed in the first place and the inevitable Army HR department.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:03 PM
1

I disagree. If we get to the point of needing a draft it will be because we need more people to die. The women who are drafted will be assigned to the roles you describe which just guarantees the men who are drafted will be put on the front line rather than having a chance at a less deadly position. We'll have to draft 50/50 for equality so the military budget will be strained to support all of the non-combat roles for the women who were drafted and not needed.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:27 PM
6

A woman?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/16 06:31 PM
0

We will have a 50/50 draft for "equality." As the majority of people dying will be the men, the armed forces will grow more and more female dominated. As soldiers are killed, we will draft more people at a 50/50 ratio while the death ratio will be closer to 100/0. This will strain budgets, resources, etc. Does anybody even consider unintended consequences anymore? or are we at the point where we know there will be unintended consequences so we just hope for the best?
/r/TheRedPill17/06/16 05:10 PM
5

No. They need to be punished the same. Until women are punished the same it won't change. Nobody cares about men/rapists.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:32 PM
24

They are fine with him continuing to bankroll the whole thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 06:22 PM
4

I just wondered if those feminists know this is a clear case of sexism and don't care or if they really are that self-centered and stupid. Why not both?
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:34 PM
2

I'm just glad that feminism is finally fighting for men's equality too. It's just like they always tell us. /s
/r/MensRights12/04/16 02:40 PM
1

A person could make the argument they already make blood sacrifices.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 06:43 PM
29

A shirt that was designed, made, and given to him by a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 10:14 AM
1

Fuck Idaho
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:12 PM
2

That university is a giant clusterfuck. Whether the claims are true or not, the point is the word offended.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/02/16 11:06 AM
2

I'm not sure if sarcastic or not...
/r/MensRights18/02/16 08:01 PM
1

It's great when it works out, but the pitfalls that the legal system has put in place makes it treacherous/potentially life ruining when it doesn't.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:53 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:04 PM
1

The original comment which I was responding to was advocating having a child outside of the traditional setting. Having that child split their time between two homes. I stand by my suggestion as a better alternative. Having an intact family is obviously what is in a child's best interest. I am stating that having a single parent is a better alternative than what was being suggested. It is also a better alternative than seeing weekend dad four days a month.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:03 PM
1

15 should definitely have a major say. It depends on the judge and the child advocate. They might listen to her exclusively because they want to avoid having kids run away from home.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 03:31 PM
1

Exclamation points don't make what you did any more valid. So you are an advocate of creating two single parent households that the child can be shared between. Good for you. I think that deal is FAR worse for the child than 1 household with 1 parent. Total control and ownership (your words not mine) in the best interest of the child is still in the best interest of the child. It also eliminates the court's potential involvement in any aspect of the child's life and yours. I never stated it was …
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:27 PM
1

Good luck. Depending on your daughters age, she might not get a say. If you are planning on leaving, do your groundwork first. Find the lawyer you want. I interviewed five before I found the one who said I would get 50/50 custody. Get a good lawyer and then follow their advice before filing if possible.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:40 AM
1

Don't put words in my mouth. I stated valid reasons for having a child on your own. You make it about control and "ownership."
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:38 AM
1

The higher earner has to pay full child support to the lower earner. The lower earner in the eyes of the law is the "custodial" parent. That being said I also get the privelege to pay until the children turn 21. A judge can lower the child support payments if they see fit.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:12 PM
1

What? No. I fought for custody and got 50/50 physical custody just like I was asking for. It had to go to the judge, but I got what I wanted which was equal shared custody. The laws have not changed since my divorce.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:01 PM
1

The governor vetoed a similar bill last time it was passed.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:52 PM
4

Why would you want to avoid a woman changing her mind and suing you for child support? Why would you want to raise a child in 1 household without having to split time between parent's houses? Why would you want to have another person making decisions on where you live, where you can move, what school district your child goes to? /s
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:51 PM
1

Maybe I wasn't clear. I paid 100% it's just that my lawyer cost less because I didn't call him every time I had a hangnail.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:48 PM
4

That was my exact situation. My lawyer was higher priced, but I was charged less than 1/2 what I paid for her lawyer. The 50/50 split in NY is ridiculous. They divide the debts by income. I.E. I make 80% of the income I am assigned 80% of the debt. Assets are divided 50/50. Not assets minus debts and split the difference. Don't get married.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:55 PM
3

Or hire a third world country woman to surrogate for you.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:52 PM
1

I've never been behind so I wouldn't know first hand.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:52 PM
15

"macho pride" or maybe they have principles about stealing other people's money.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:41 PM
3

You should have stopped with "Never get married." If she chooses to be a stay at home mom against your will what are you going to do about it? Divorce her?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:30 PM
7

The person that makes more as a result of their direct action/choices is forced to subsidize another person after the legal bond between the two is dissolved. Your definition of fair differs from mine.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:28 PM
4

It also doesn't show the amount of loans the father had to take out to pay for all of the lawyers involved.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:22 PM
1

This seems inaccurate. Child support is tax free for the recipient. Alimony is not. Source: I pay both.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:20 PM
1

Try oppressing an entire gender.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:18 PM
10

Source?
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:18 PM
10

Amen. The primary bread winner should always get custody of the children when said person is fit and willing. Anything else is a detriment to the children.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:18 PM
0

/s
/r/PussyPass16/02/16 08:19 PM
1

Do you want bastards?
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:16 PM
1

Anyone who thinks "withdrawal" is a method of birth control can't be too bright in the first place... Or they could be right and you are the one who is misinformed. Withdrawal method is as effective as condoms
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:09 PM
2

Cool story bro.
/r/PussyPass10/02/16 02:53 PM
12

Have I unwittingly signed up for cat facts?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:11 PM
2

If I stay married I can kick them out of the house when they are 18.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 10:36 AM
3

I'm in NY and am ordered to pay until they turn 21. I also have 50% physical custody of them.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:54 PM
16

Or save for your kids' college.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:24 PM
1

That's what I'm trying to say. If the sexes were reversed there shouldn't be a difference. Unfortunately, if the sexes were reversed the man wouldn't be accused of "having sex" with a 16 year old. The media headline would be "Teacher raped student."
/r/PussyPass16/01/16 12:26 PM
1

So the same could be said if the sexes were reversed? I have no issue with your statement as long as it applies to all circumstances.
/r/PussyPass16/01/16 11:55 AM
15

She did not have sex with two students. She raped them.
/r/PussyPass15/01/16 09:52 PM
4

" I am not a feminist" - Malala Yousafzai
/r/PussyPass09/11/15 10:21 AM
5

Why? Pits of rage are terribly underrated and usually inspire people to do things that push their boundaries.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:35 PM
3

I would like to expand on your idea. These videos should be submitted to a new subreddit where an online community can evaluate the nefariousness of the interactions.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:07 PM
6

I still like that somehow women are better than men at something that nobody can do. The one thing they thought they had. They don't.
/r/PussyPass03/11/15 03:47 PM
7

It's not a myth. Women can't multi-task either.
/r/PussyPass03/11/15 10:25 AM
0

Kinda true. Might not be that helpful.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:44 PM
3

Women aren't generally underpaid.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 06:41 PM
1

EVERYBODY STO-O-O-OP!!! LOOK AT ME!!! MY BROTHERS, NOTHING WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY SHEDDING BEER ROBOT BLOOD!! NONE OF US CAN DIE UNTIL OUR JOB IS DONE!!
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 03:50 PM
11

Who needs a sex robot? I want a beer robot that doesn't talk.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 08:05 PM
3

I am thinking one robot that can change its features to be anybody I want. I might need two or three, but a harem would just be overkill.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 08:04 PM
12

Great. Now I can't vote for him either?
/r/PussyPass14/09/15 10:41 PM
2

Patriarchy - 1 Feminists - 0
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/15 05:48 PM
13

He's dating a pig. The feminists should be happy he's chosen one of them.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 11:51 AM
8

Relevant
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 03:55 PM
9

It's seven out of every five women. Daily! Shitlord.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 03:48 PM
4

I am in the same boat as /u/rp_divorced. Why would he increase his workload and effort just to further financially support his ex? Sure, he could theoretically increase his workload 50% and then get 50% of the proceeds from the extra effort. It's hard enough to get ahead in this world without an anchor tied around your neck while you are swimming against the current.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 08:43 PM
2

You are correct. It's like being spotted 50 points in an NFL game. Is it insurmountable? Technically not.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:45 PM
4

The Patriarchy© has some splainin' to do.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:41 PM
7

Of course fitness should be the primary factor. I am pretty sure that vagina is the sole determining factor at the moment.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:37 PM
5

Of course it should be that way. Too often people "feel" that it isn't fair to distribute custody based on income. In fact, it will be better for the children and also encourage both parents to be more productive members of society.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:44 PM
2

This is very common. At least in my state. If I listed all of the injustices in divorce court it would make your head spin. Child support is just the tip of the iceberg.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/15 01:58 PM
1

My alimony is closed ended too. $400 a month for four years after a 15 year marriage and she was actively working the entire time. I guess I "got off" better than some, but I still feel cheated.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/15 07:21 PM
5

Sorry man. I was being sarcastic. I have 50/50 custody of my kids after a bitter divorce battle so I definitely feel for you. I still get to pay alimony and child support! What state are you in?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/15 07:06 PM
5

How do you know?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/15 06:27 PM
0

What about robot women?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:06 PM
3

I advocate life in prison. People like this need to be removed from society.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/15 08:00 PM
1

Not with that attitude, it isn't. Give them time...
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:21 PM
0

Start making comments about the most trivial of things. News report about the wage gap? "Mark one up for the Patriarchy!" Man found innocent of a crime? "Patriarchy - 1 Feminists - 0." Line at the women's room? "Male privilege is awesome!" I'm positive if you keep at it long enough she will eventually decide to join the winning team.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:14 PM
3

I bet he still gets to pay child support eventually.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:57 PM
0

Patriarchy - 1 Feminists - 0
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:35 PM
4

Kinda speaks to my original point...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 05:58 PM
2

Let's see. If there's any confirmation that this is just a proxy for /r/beatingwomen[1] , it's this comment How is "Women do not understand consequences" not the epitome of misogyny? I don't think it's a grand leap of logic to extrapolate what I said. Snarky response explaining the "thinking" behind the comments you have made and having to have the last word in 3, 2, 1 ...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 05:47 PM
2

Where did I say you did?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 05:29 PM
7

Misogyny = beating women. Hyperbole much?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 12:31 PM
1

Apology accepted.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 11:08 AM
16

Nothing in my comment advocates beating women, but you are welcome to twist my comment to fit your narrative.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/15 10:13 AM
62

Women do not understand consequences.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/15 07:18 PM
5

We should obviously make weaker doors. We need to lower the strength testing on doors in order to accommodate the firefighters that are allowed to take the weaker test. Maybe we should require 50% of houses to be built using weaker building codes and then send the weaker firefighters to those emergencies.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:42 PM
6

Stress Facts Pressure Facts What a visionary you are with your questioning. Good on you. Don't let the haters deny the facts.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:38 PM
5

rape through a car door is impossible Shitlord. You're literally raping me right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/15 04:16 PM
1

Unfortunately yes I am sure. I pay 25% which is pretty much the default for 2 kids.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:04 PM
6

Maybe it was...Maybe it wasn't. But would you say that phrase in jest to somebody that had literally just raped you in the ass? Intellectual honesty and all...
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:03 PM
1

My response was addressing the "Time spent with father (less time with father, more money)" line which is false in my situation. It is not adjusted because I have the kids 50% of the time. I am contributing my 17% to her and I receive nothing back in return. If the idea is that a child costs 17% then in reality I am contributing 25 1/2% to raise my one child.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:30 PM
1

"So, if both parents have equal incomes, the CS is intended to cover only half of the child's expenses." - This may be true in your state but I know in NY the non-custodial parent pays a specific percentage regardless of the custodial parent's income.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:31 PM
9

"Time spent with father (less time with father, more money)" - Not always true. I have 50/50 custody and pay full child support because in the state of NY I am considered the non-custodial parent because I make more money. I also get to pay until they turn 21.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:22 PM
67

I'm in the minority. The guy is a scumbag, but that settlement is still ridiculous. 10 years and he loses half of his wealth. She married a guy that had FOUR failed marriages and knew exactly what she was getting into. She probably was the woman he left his fourth wife for. Regardless of the circumstances the outcome is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:24 PM
1

Boom.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:50 AM
19

Exactly! One of them was clearly Mexican!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/15 09:47 AM
6

I predict a porn in her future. She already has the mattress.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:24 AM
1

I would think a reasonable judge would not force me to pay emancipated kids. I would also think a reasonable judge wouldn't force me to pay child support when they are no longer children... I know the state law ties their hands, but WTF.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:20 PM
1

I don't understand the logic behind this at all. Not that there is any. I have 50% shared custody. I pay child support to offset the difference between her income and mine. So if my kids move out on their own before they are 21, I will pay the support to them but she will contribute nothing? Holy shit that is fucked up.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:16 PM
1

That does not sound accurate.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:21 PM
1

I would think I could petition the courts to stop paying child support to my ex if they moved out on their own. Knowing the family court system I am probably wrong...
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:58 PM
1

It goes against logic. It is now in my best interest to encourage my kids not to go to college and move out on their own so I can quit paying ex-wife (I.E. child) support.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:12 PM
1

"Child support is only paid until the child is of the age of majority (18)" - 21 in NY
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:58 PM
2

No means she likes it rough.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 06:44 PM
3

Link?
/r/PussyPass08/04/15 06:11 PM
2

What number do you want to be?
/r/askTRP26/03/15 07:13 PM
1

Absolutely. While I find the amount I pay to be gross and having been thru it, I know the divorce system is broken. I totally agree that children need to be taken care of but anytime I hear people talking about something being about the children it rarely is.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:02 PM
1

I agree that 1 parent is not ideal, but that is the way it turns out a lot of the time now with no financial burden placed on the custodial parent. I had to fight to get the 50% custody I have now which has left me a little jaded if you couldn't tell. :) I think if everybody feels it is in the best interest of the children to maintain their previous lifestyle, then maybe tax payer funded support is the way to go no matter how revolting it sounds on paper.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:56 PM
1

If a person argues that child support is to maintain the standard of living of the child because it is in their best interest. Then why isn't it in the best interest of the child to be with the parent that makes the greater income? It would actually maintain their standard of living and provide incentive for the non-custodial parent to do better financially. This also sets a better example for the kids. I have zero incentive to improve my income at this point because for every dollar extra I ear…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:30 PM
1

The kids will never be at the standard of living they enjoyed before the divorce. My income is now supporting two households. I can no longer save for their college education. I am obligated to pay until they turn twenty one. That will lead me to encourage them to skip college and go their own way. This is not in their best interest and when people suggest it is they are either misinformed or like the free ride given to dead-beat mothers. The children should go with the parent that makes the hig…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 09:12 PM
1

Meh. I cannot find the actual law to link to but I am living it so I really don't feel the need to provide proof. Maybe if I have some free time later I'll look it up. My children did not have a court appointed attorney either, so the website is dubious at best. I do need to clarify my statement that the person making less is deemed the custodial parent. This is only for the calculation of child support. Not the actual physical custody of the child. I have 50 /50 shared physical custody of my ch…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:30 PM
1

New York
/r/MensRights25/02/15 08:01 PM
4

Child support is typically a mandated percentage of the "non-custodial" parents income. Need plays no part in it. If I make $100,000 a year my ex needs 100% more child support than if I made $50,000 a year. In my state it doesn't matter who has the kids more/less. The person that makes less is declared the custodial parent and is entitled to full child support.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 07:19 PM
1

Not with that attitude they don't.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 07:10 PM
4

That's something Hitler would say.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:44 PM
1

What do you think brought me to this sub? I know this sub is the truth I just wished I would have found it 17 years ago. My dad actually talked me out of getting the marriage annulled (sp?) in my first year of marriage. Thanks Dad.
/r/askTRP21/09/14 01:45 PM
1

Yes. Definitely check divorce laws in your state. I live in NY which caps alimony at five years. NJ just passed a law "improving" their current divorce laws so you only pay alimony for the total amount of years you were married unless it's over 20 and then you are on the hook for life. NY presumes that whoever makes more money in a shared custody arrangement is the non-custodial parent and they should pay full child support to the other parent. Luckily I had a judge that did not make me pay the …
/r/askTRP21/09/14 01:42 PM
41

Let me tell you a story. When I got married my wife and I earned nearly the same money. I made more but not grossly more. Five years into the relationship I was offered a higher paying job 1200 miles away that would take her closer to her family and she worked at a job that she could easily transfer or find a similar paying job in her field. We decided she would quit her job and find work once we moved. I accepted the offer. Once we got to our new home she decided to pursue her lifelong dream of…
/r/askTRP20/09/14 09:31 AM
5

Don't you mean could?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/14 04:52 PM
2

Everybody pony up $1 and enter one man in the contest. Make sure he is the best. 1 man vs. the all women. Man wins. Does not make the news... Nevermind it was a horrible idea to begin with.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:02 PM
1

Just cram it in her cramhole. Duh.
/r/seduction13/08/14 02:58 PM
5

Has anybody considered a men calling in sick day on National Women's day? Similar to the ones the hispanics and gays have done in the recent past? How hard would this be to get started?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:13 PM
5

I pay the same health insurance rate as all of my female coworkers. Under the affordable Care Act insurance companies will no longer be allowed to charge women more than men.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:16 PM
6

[Young] men tend to sport more reckless driving habits, and we are statistically more likely to get into accidents than women. It's a harsh truth, but that's why car insurance premiums are stacked against us. Women use more health insurance. I think the authors point stands.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:08 PM
1

I will not be far from the wife as we will reside in the same school district. I am glad you found something that works for you and your ex. How old are your children?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:19 PM
1

Her first request was for the children to switch households 4 times a week. The judge and I both thought that was ludicrous. Twice a week switching is her attempt at negotiation. We currently reside in the same household (oh the fun times we have had) because I am not willing to move until I have a court order awarding me 50% custody of my children. Once the final order is in place we will be residing within the same school district.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:17 PM
2

Did you switch households twice a week or every other week?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:15 PM
3

My children always come first. Thanks for the support.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:14 PM
2

She seems to think that her legal fees are coming from me. I have a feeling that the ones up until the trial will be (part of the overall judgement) but I will talk with my lawyer and do the best I can. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:13 PM
4

I believe OP is a lesbian because she wants to be a rapist.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter