TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LilWongWang Archive

View 1 post and 100 comments by LilWongWang on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

LilWongWang/r/ExRedPill03/06/22 09:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Damn. Snatch is snatch I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:24 AM
-2

How did you get your body count at such a commendable prestige? I've only got like 7 under my belt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:11 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 09:45 PM
1

I'm a guy, my brotha.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 07:08 PM
0

So why do women want to feel protected, and still possess the innate desire to feel protected? The short answer is men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 07:08 PM
8

This is true. Men are essentially extinguishing the fire they caused.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:21 PM
1

I'd advocate for the same. Fact is, people believe in something called "love". This term is indescribably ambiguous, nuanced, and complex. It's contingent on endless external factors. Relationships are primarily consisted of two types of love - eros, and pragma. In that particular order. Biologically, these two integral aspects of love are very conditional. I know, I'm inadvertently being captain obvious right now. But I feel like part of being somewhat intelligent and over-analytical is imminen…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:19 AM
2

Within the depths of human perception, how much casual sex a man has can elicit reactions of respect and/or admiration, depending on the reason(s) he receives so much casual punani. If a guy has legitimate, formidablegame, and is genuinely attractive to most women, then respect. If he uses his financial prowess to his advantage, respect. If he indulges in rent-a-snatch on the daily, then do better. It also depends on how the man carries himself outside of those frequent hookups. How mature, astu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:04 AM
1

The term "love" is purely conditional and contingent on so many hindbrain variables and factors that are largely out of humans' conscious control. Heterosexual infatuation and romance is enables and unfurled when requirements are met from a reproductive, or a provisional standpoint. Males and females have roles to play, and those roles don't just miraculously disappear because we have iPhones and Tesla's.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:25 AM
1

Then why on earth would modern humans date in this current socio-economic climate?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 03:48 AM
-2

For them to feel assured that this wasn't the case, their woman would simply have to lie to them, tongue in cheek. Simply put, resources and financial security are integral parts of manhood that is pretty widely accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:45 AM
-6

There's a fundamental flaw with your main query. Which means your forefront presumptions are probably erroneous. Resource accumulation and possession is inherently a positive masculine characteristic. So is provision, protection, and so forth. You'd have to accurately restructure your question in order to get the correct answers to your question, you feel me big dawg?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:27 AM
2

Hey, I agree with you wholeheartedly. Men are generally substantially more guilty of these common occurences moreso than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:49 AM
1

I have no idea why you don't think I didn't know what they were trying to say. Sometimes people could use some assistance in understanding statements from various perspectives. Or, oftentimes people just aren't capable of genuinely understanding the first time around. It still doesn't mean that - even if a woman "has more power in the relationship" - that she would do anything with it at all, much less abuse and mistreat the guy because of it. She never asked for this power. Again, I don't belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 06:17 AM
1

Although it's evident that the above commenter isn't thoroughly aware of the specific concept they are attempting to convey, they seem to be implying that the ordinary (obviously in comparison with their own respective genders) woman generally does have more intrinsic sexual/reproductive value as opposed to the ordinary man. This is likely why they stated that women would oftentimes have considerably more potential (added the appropriate term that should've initially been used for further clarif…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 06:02 AM
1

"What women call sex"? What does that mean? I'd like to believe that the likely implication here is that the act of 'sex' is objectively a considerably different act of intimacy depending on gender. "Bad at what women call sex" most definitely refers to the ability (or more appropriately, lack thereof) to orgasm as a woman. The vast majority of men subconsciously overlook the female orgasm, whilst selfishly prioritizing their own. From a biological perspective, it may seem as if this behaviour i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/23 01:36 AM
-1

Biologically speaking, females in the majority of mammalian species tend to be particularly, subconsciously risk-averse (physically, and verbally). It's no secret that a vast proportion of modern humans would undoubtedly prefer to walk an easy path throughout life, including women. With that being said, approximately 10,000+ years of patriarchal oppression likely caused women of previous generations to truly forget their fundamental sense of reproductive value (given they are within the age rang…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/23 02:24 PM
2

There's no need to outwardly express this preference in such a manner, as most women do in fact feel the same way. Thank you for sharing, however. Nothing unusual about this desire at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/23 03:24 AM
1

That's a logical fallacy. Do men and women have a deeply-rooted, inherent biological imperative to have sex (either for procreational or pleasurable purposes)? Of course. However, why, when, where, and whom they engage in sexual activities with is generally dependent on gender. More specifically, the initial attraction triggers between males and females are entirely, astoundingly different.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 12:59 AM
1

No. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/23 12:55 AM
–

Aaaannnndddd....?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 08:09 PM
1

I believe he's referring to the vast differences in innate sexual preferences between the sexes. The fundamental motivators for sexual/romantic relations between males and females are far from the same, from what's been empirically observed throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 08:08 PM
1

What are some predominant aspects/characteristics of "high-value males" (in your opinion)?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 08:04 PM
1

It kind of seems as if one gender is considerably pickier. I wonder why that is, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 08:02 PM
–

And...?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 07:59 PM
-3

I never implied that you made this statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 07:43 PM
2

Why should women be shamed?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 02:49 PM
21

It's always considered important to remember that not all men will be able to achieve the same set of idealized prospects, financial/socio-economic prowess, or physiological archetype. From an inherent, mathematical perspective, it simply isn't possible for all (or even most) males to achieve this magnitude of sexual/romantic desirability. It's also to be expected that the vast majority of women won't appreciate your vague generalizations regarding their innate sexual preferences. Regardless of …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 02:42 PM
19

What even is this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 02:33 PM
1

I applaud you for not being delusional, and being as genuine as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:55 PM
1

This depends on gender, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:43 PM
–

It's understandable and empirically observed that there certainly are some women who would overlook lower-tier physical attributes of males for a set degree of financial prowess, given the hypothetical male in question is within the top 1% of earners currently. However, there are also some women who need the whole package to be sexually, romantically, and maritally satisfied (as in, as close as possible to their ideal). All in all, there is quite a bit of nuance at play here, as not all males ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:40 PM
–

Not exactly. I'd consider that as a bonus (only for some) in feminine attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:34 PM
–

Interesting. And what characteristics, in particular, would you be searching for?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:33 PM
–

Women get a hit into career and earning potential when they have kids. Well, naturally. If I was an employer, prioritizing critical alterations (such as wage rates depending on gender) within the workplace is what's best for business. There are numerous professionally conducted studies and almost an infinite number of anecdotal experiences that effectively demonstrate the palpable sex differences in, not only initial attraction, but attraction triggers in the long term as well (such as after hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:32 PM
–

Well, we all have flaws at the end of the day. As long as you're content for the time being, no one is in any place to judge or ridicule your marital well-being.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 04:17 AM
–

Not quite. It's quite a vague declaration, that could be broken down more thoroughly. There are, and likely always will be, certain characteristics principally associated with either males or females. Sure, the vast majority of humans are heterosexual, but how exactly would one define that statement in today's unnecessarily diverse, overly complicated society? Are most AMAB humans exclusively attracted to AFAB humans (and vice versa)? Sure, but that's not exactly meticulous information. Aside fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 04:15 AM
–

Just to clarify, I'm not referring to knowledge, albeit that's still arguably just as important, and is also likely partially controlled by intelligence. I mean true, inherent intelligence (IQ). For men, this is such a prevalent, subconsciously important trait that should logically be taken into consideration a lot more than it currently is. However, the deeply socially ingrained stigma amongst young boys of being perceived as a "nerd", or "geek" is almost unwavering. For those who were truly bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 04:08 AM
–

Well, I should've been more specific. A man's earning potential is more likely the game changer here. This doesn't necessarily mean that broke, ambitionless males are just as romantically viable as ones who are profoundly financially endowed, however. Indirectly, a man's earning potential (correlated with various innate characteristics, such as intelligence) mildly affects his current salary. Just not definitively.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 04:01 AM
–

I see. Those are reasonable and thoroughly acceptable preferences, undoubtedly. Well, best wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 03:56 AM
–

So what are your personal preferences if you don't mind me asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:58 AM
–

All in all, money is certainly a factor for the vast majority, just to varying degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:58 AM
–

Just because women are free to accumulate their own personal financial resources and economic accolades, that doesn't mean that they prefer to walk that path. It's a highly unlikely "cause-and-effect" fallacy, as proven by countries with the most socially perceived gender equality. The "Gender Equality Paradox", if you will.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:56 AM
–

Yeah, I understand that. That wasn't my question...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:50 AM
–

In my humble outlook, the palpable polarity in sexual dimorphism, (and more importantly, the differences in innate biological roles between the sexes) mostly affect the differences in sexual/romantic preferences between the sexes. Not so much conditioning, albeit that is another prominent environmental factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:48 AM
–

It's quite difficult to scientifically, and objectively justify. However, women do tend to overwhelmingly prefer masculinity (and vice versa for men).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:42 AM
–

I believe what this fellow is trying to explain to you is that attraction triggers are vastly different between the sexes for deeply entrenched biological reasons. Of course, it's more than likely that your opinion and preferences are just as valid as anyone else's, however, it's a statistical minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:41 AM
–

You value physical attributes predominantly I presume?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:39 AM
–

I feel like people really seem to underestimate the importance of intelligence in a potential male partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:37 AM
–

I don't care how much money he has. This isn't the most plausible opinion, with all due respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:37 AM
–

What are your preferences if you don't mind me asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:35 AM
–

May I ask why that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:34 AM
–

That fellow must've been severely stunted in terms of physical appearance in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:34 AM
–

Generally, financial prowess is a foremost factor in masculine attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:33 AM
–

This is a reasonable take.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:31 AM
–

It really depends on how hot she is at the end of the day. Essentially, the answer varies greatly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:31 AM
–

It's not conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 02:29 AM
9

Precisely. Now try convincing the unintelligent, ignorant, narcissistic homophobes. It's not the easiest task, I'd rather be chasing chickens all day long.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 05:29 PM
9

Some humans are significantly less adaptable to vast shifts in their way of living/overall perception. That's pretty much all there is to it. One very prominent sheep within society declared that the LGBT community should be considered unethical, and all of its other little sheep follow along willingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/23 05:25 PM
3

I have to disagree with you here. Those males of greater genetic/biological quality, and greater socioeconomic status/power will always have a significant amount of options in romantic, sexual, and platonic aspects of relationships. I've witnessed this phenomenon countless times now. The perceived advantages and disadvantages of being average, and well above average aren't equivalent. This is why the red pill is so flawed, misguiding/misinformed, and illogical. Not every single male has the inhe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 03:00 AM
1

Well they clearly aren't the worst opinions to some people lmao. Idk, it's just so astonishingly nonsensical to even consider these dehumazing, arbitrary, limiting roles to someone who you'd consider spending the rest of your life with. And you know what? Sadly it's not even JUST men who are willingly ignorant and easily influenced in this case. I can't tell you how many times I've seen women in the gym lifting heavy, to then completely stop lifting after being complimented on how impressive her…
/r/ExRedPill07/09/22 07:41 PM
2

Yeah, it may be a verbal tactic to get through to all the men (boys) out there with embarrassingly fragile masculinity. Like I personally struggle to comprehend it. I'm an AMAB human, have a Y chromosome, have a well functioning dick and balls and identify as a male over the age of 18. I'm therefore a MAN. A man who's not particularly into traditional women. People's opinions are so senseless sometimes that it's completely fucks up my entire day.
/r/ExRedPill05/09/22 12:53 PM
1

You totally misinterpreted what I said.
/r/ExRedPill05/09/22 12:47 PM
1

Women who "sugar"?
/r/ExRedPill17/08/22 03:06 AM
1

Look, even the OP agreed with me. Just because women are generally attracted to masculinity doesn't mean that they don't value a little bit of femininity in their man on occasion. BUT, that doesn't change the general norm. What makes you believe you're not an outlier? I dare you to ask any woman you know if they'd ever date a man the same height as them, weaker/as strong as them, equal or lower income than them, more agreeable than them, more emotionally expressive than them, etc. Let me tell yo…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 11:28 PM
1

I didn't dismiss you in any way. Maybe you misinterpreted me, but I acknowledged your attraction and preference for a man who's in touch with his feminine side. It's just not what most people reading this thread would perceive that statement as, so I thought I'd just clear that up for them. But look, if you're honestly ATTRACTED to femininity in a man, I think it's safe to say we're both outliers haha.
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 11:00 PM
6

I sure got a lot of stuff out of it! Internalized hatred for women, and even men. Anything particularly good that I didn't already know? Absolutely not.
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 10:15 PM
1

Are you kidding me? So a few points to make here. The vast majority of younger women are on birth control/artificial oral contraceptives. The impact those have on your sexuality is immense. Women on the pill are disproportionately attracted to feminine, more meek and submissive men. There's multiple studies on this. Also, when you say "romantic", in what way is that feminine? Romance has very distinguishable meanings for men and women. Women play the feminine/passive role, and men play the mascu…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 10:11 PM
1

I think you're missing a fundamental understanding of what rp preaches. RP gurus' main focus is to try and change men. Especially the more feminine men who have trouble attracting women, rp has become a safe space for them. Somewhere men can be vulnerable, and vent without being subconsciously judged. I'm def not RP myself, however, one common perceptions they have is that women are generally attracted to masculinity. That is something I think we all can agree on. Now, I'm absolutely not saying …
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 09:38 PM
1

But for myself at least, as a guy who prefers a "stronger" more capable woman instead of a traditional woman, it kinda sucks to accept that I'm somewhat of an outlier. What I'm trying to say is that the amount of women/men out there that are NATURALLY egalitarian and actively prefer an egalitarian dynamic where sexual attraction can still occur is def not common at all. The traditional dynamic is something I'm afraid I'm going to have to settle for in the future if I can't find a woman who I can…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 09:01 PM
1

I hate to say it, but I do somewhat agree with you bud. I don't really believe a hetero person can be attracted to someone they consider a best true best friend. That's not to say a man and woman can't have a healthy relationship, but it's usually either one or the other. I'd say, if you want to be friends with her, treat her like an equal. Show your vulnerability, and feminine side (I believe everyone has a masculine and feminine side), and let her "lead" at times as well. A friend to me is som…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 04:49 PM
1

I believe the problem is that women seem to be attracted to masculinity. The above commenter sort of does have a point. Don't get me wrong, I would love to have an equal partnership with someone who I can also call my absolute best friend and romantic partner, however finding someone who genuinely wants that, AND is also attracted to a more egalitarian person, is rare. Maybe that's what you were implying in the last paragraph? Men who are naturally masculine, and when it isn't forced, are likely…
/r/ExRedPill16/08/22 04:45 PM
1

What do you mean "right disease"?
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 01:20 PM
1

I and many others under the soft constructivist position have inferred that gender identity cannot wholly be a construct and are more favoring to the idea that gender roles, expressions, (etc) are products of gender identity constructions rather than gender identity itself being a construct. I can agree with this, most people inherently know what they identify as, but those characteristics that come with gender identity are considerably more nuanced and variable. So it isn’t that a woman cannot …
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 12:27 PM
1

That men are the "boss", and women are the "employees" in this hypothetical scenario? And that an employee is somehow "equal" to the boss simply by being equitable? Let's try again, answering direct questions doesn't seem to be your strong suit. What were you implying?
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 12:01 PM
1

"Any you can imagine". I'm asking YOU what you think those differences are. And no, in this case they aren't ultimately irrelevant.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 11:58 AM
1

Just what are you implying here? If it's what I think, I truthfully feel for you.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 03:21 AM
1

What does that mean? Care to explain what those "differences" are?
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 03:20 AM
1

No disrespect, but I believe you're a bit lost. Correlation doesn't equate to causation in this case. I don't think many people would assume that the vast majority of straight, cisgender people inherently want to have a certain, set, gender exclusive set of roles subconsciously assigned to them. Gender exclusive "roles" as a whole should be what we should be actively trying to abolish. I'm now fairly curious as to how you began to question people's gender expression aspirations, because I person…
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 01:38 AM
1

Bro, why are commenters like those still lingering around in an exredpill sub? I'm really struggling to wrap my head around it.
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 12:16 AM
1

Look, I see the message you're attempting to get across with this post. You, and I'm sure most men, would ideally like to embrace a more "positive" form of manliness/masculinity. However, what allows ideologies like these to accumulate toxicity is assuming these are male/gender exclusive traits. What we need to be promoting is HUMAN traits that every ADULT should strive for. Being a biological male (AMAB) human, who's attracted to AFAB humans should be enough for insecure, strictly binary behavi…
/r/ExRedPill11/08/22 12:13 AM
5

Sorry, but I don't completely agree with this. He's obviously entitled to his own opinion, but attempting to categorize half of the population with a few "masculine" traits is not what we're after. People like this aren't nearly as bad as the redpill gurus, but they're still ignorant. We should be telling ADULTS to embrace their strength, protectiveness, leadership, and make sacrifices for their loved ones. Not just men. A real man wants a partner. A partner that loves/respects him reciprocally,…
/r/ExRedPill10/08/22 11:59 PM
1

Well I originally wanted collective reactions of those supposed RedPilled videos/articles, to confirm that their claims are absolutely fallacious. Just a coping mechanism, as I don't really have anyone that I can personally talk to about these subjects. But you're right.
/r/ExRedPill06/06/22 10:21 PM
1

That's a really good question to ask. It might not. See, I can't exactly pinpoint why that bothers me so much. Why a traditional relationship is such a considerable deal-breaker for me. It just is. My take, you need to figure this out to be a strong partner to someone else. Agreed, although I've never held the standards/expectations of my future partner to ones I myself can't reach. I know I have some underlying issues to deal with and overcome before that relationship begins. But if I'm not mis…
/r/ExRedPill06/06/22 10:14 PM
1

I completely understand what you're saying. Instead of directly attacking embodied patriarchal beliefs, I must become one with them, in order for healthy necessary relapses to occur. Therefore, it'll be much easier to consciously implement behaviors/habits in order to fully change accordingly. Correct? EDIT: Btw, what personality disorder did you have exactly, and how was your journey to finally achieving change?
/r/ExRedPill05/06/22 11:08 PM
1

I guess my question would by if you addressed anything internal, like pain or any of the like or if so far you've "only" addressed real life mannerisms. Alright. I had a high school GF. However when I found out she only wanted to be with me because of subjective, superficial stuff, I won't lie, that tore me up. Prior to me dabbling in various Evo. Psych. "discoveries" and indulging in RedPill ideologies, I always thought nothing of slight sexism being expressed in any circumstance. I always just…
/r/ExRedPill05/06/22 04:12 PM
1

Look, I recognize the slightly self-righteous stance you've taken, but if you're directly referring to previous RedPilled beliefs you once cultivated...Then no, I'm not just going to accept that I'm (or more specifically, was) inherently sexist. And that applies to both romantic and platonic relationships, as well as within my future professional occupational environments. If I recognize internalized flaws that directly compromise my very strong sense of morality and humanity, then it's naturall…
/r/ExRedPill05/06/22 03:47 PM
2

Hey man, I appreciate your response! However, I may have phrased myself a little imprecisely. The mind can be quite treacherous in its front-level conclusions, especially if you're vulnerable (as you appear to have been) to all sort of exploitative movements/ideologies. I wouldn't necessarily say I'm as easily persuaded by those RedPill ideologies as I was used to as a kid. Rather, just annoyed and overtly pissed at the fact people still think like that. So I guess, you're right, I'm still sligh…
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 03:30 PM
1

please don't ever visit that site again. Highly unlikely I ever will, unless I'm ever contemplating being on this world, and need to remind myself how fucked up some people can be.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 02:46 AM
1

I was figuring out how to quote comments properly, but kept failing. I've never used reddit on my laptop before, always mobile lol.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 02:42 AM
1

Ohhhh makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 01:09 AM
1

What link related to RooshV? I did just look him up, and yeah he does seem like another classic misogynist.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 01:08 AM
1

Yeah, I guess I meant metaphorically, although having a partner close to my height would also help me perceive them as a true equal (just my personal preference). Also, tall women seem like goddesses to me, maybe I'm weird haha.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 12:56 AM
1

Yeah, but listening to a woman on YouTube with over 100,000 subscribers openly and genuinely advocate for patriarchal gender roles It does make me a bit insecure. I know there's women out there who are willing to be partners, but she's implying that women don't really want to be. For her to say that women have had to adopt masculine (male exclusive according to her) traits such as leadership, dominance, assertiveness, power and status, and that she's operating against her "true nature", that jus…
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 12:49 AM
1

That's very admirable of you. That's probably what I look for in a partner as well. Someone who'll actually walk by my side, rather than behind me. Funny story, I've actually been called gay for preferring a woman closer to my height, or maybe a little shorter because finding a woman 185cm is quite rare. All in all, I just want a woman who's on equal footing with me.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 12:41 AM
0

Lol thx. I'm not exactly familiar with RooshV though. But yeah, I just want people to watch/read the links, so I'm secure in knowing I'm not alone when I have a strong negative visceral reaction to them. Like, almost wanting to throw up. Did you happen to watch them? That YouTuber may be slightly painful to react to at first, just a mild warning.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 12:27 AM
1

Can you take a look at the videos then? It might be a little painful to watch, but I just want someone to completely debunk all that bs. For my sanity's sake.
/r/ExRedPill03/06/22 11:08 PM
1

If everything in those articles were 100% true, that would evidently greatly inhibit my chances of finding a true equal partner (that's a woman) in life. In other words, my ideal relationship would hold absolutely NO sexist expectations at all, besides the fact that she is the one who will get pregnant, not me. That's just a basic biological difference that realistically has no bearing on evolved patriarchal desires though. Like I fully understand that when my partner is pregnant, she'll be most…
/r/ExRedPill03/06/22 11:07 PM
1

Honestly, nothing in particular, because pretty much everything that was said bothered me.
/r/ExRedPill03/06/22 10:36 PM
1

For the people who believe they're wrong, I'd like to hear their outlook. I just feel like communicating with people who are actually against sexism is a more effective RedPill detox method rather than doing it all alone.
/r/ExRedPill03/06/22 10:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter