Lil_Boots1 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I'm not wrong here. You can always start by using reliable methods of birth control. And yes, it's much harder to control male fertility than female fertility. The hormone cycle that creates a mature egg is really very simple, and much easier to disrupt than the constant process of sperm production. But if you want to exercise your reproductive rights that no woman can control, for now you've got condoms. So no, one sex doesn't have all the reproductive rights. Now, once something goes wrong, women do have total co…	/r/MensRights	05/06/12 05:43 PM
1	I'm not wrong here. I didn't say I agreed with them; I said that it's how the system justifies itsself. I'm aware that it doesn't work like they pretend it does. I'm aware that the system is broken on so many different levels. I think that with oversight on how the money is spent and a change in how they deal with parents (because fathers should definitely have full custody more often than they do) who haven't kept up with payments for whatever reason. And while you have women who do abuse the system and then their…	/r/MensRights	05/06/12 02:36 PM
1	I'm not wrong here. That's an admirable quality in anyone, but it's especially rare in anonymous internet people.	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 07:12 PM
1	I'm not wrong here. It happens to everyone. I just didn't want to see you come out looking like an asshole when clearly you really didn't want to be associated with an asshole.	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 06:14 PM
7	I'm not wrong here. You're disgusted that in a 1000 word post in which a woman weighs her options, she considers both her finances and the father's finances? She also mentioned that she planned on discussing the options with him. She actually was leaning toward adoption, but wanted an outside perspective on the logistics of her situation, which is complicated to say the least. The overwhelming opinion in TwoXChromosomes was that she should absolutely not keep the baby because no one would win in that situation. If …	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 03:48 PM
2	I'm not wrong here. Definitely, but if a woman is giving in to her desire for hypergamy and cuckolding, then this reproductive strategy applies to the question of "Who would she be more likely to sleep with when she's fertile?" It just doesn't apply to all or even most women, just as we can't apply the male version to all or necessarily most men.	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 03:35 PM
1	I'm not wrong here. Not that I agree with it, but here's the logic behind the laws: If the man is entitled to the baby if a woman gets knocked up, then he's also entitled to use her body in a way that can be harmful and even fatal. She's allowed to make that choice because whatever she chooses can literally kill her or affect her health forever. Now, if a woman gets knocked up by a man and keeps the baby with or without his support, she is not entitled to his money. The baby that he helped accidentally oops into be…	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 03:29 PM
4	I'm not wrong here. Hey, uh, it looks to me like she said that he's an "active men's rights reader."	/r/MensRights	04/06/12 03:14 PM
1	"It (reproductive rights) will never be fair. Some people seem unable to understand this." Legal doesn't mean available. For example, in South Dakota in 2008, there were only 2 abortion providers. That's two in 77,000 square miles, meaning that on top of how cost-prohibitive abortions can be in the best of circumstances, for women in many parts of the state you're adding travel costs, as well as missed work and lost wages because of the need to travel so far. It doesn't help that the only abortion provider I could find on Google was a Planned Parenthood in Sioux Falls that only provid…	/r/MensRights	28/02/12 02:06 AM