TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lilusa Archive

View 2 posts and 118 comments by Lilusa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

google the name of your city and "legal aid." Also the name of the city/county that has jurisdiction over the case. You can also try calling your state bar's referral service.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:50 PM
2

You'd be surprised. There is a lot of help for low income people plus most states require attorneys to do a certain amount of pro bono work. Really that is the only way to do this. Source: I worked in family law. The most sure fire way to screw yourself is to not get an attorney.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:01 PM
1

You need an attorney.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:13 AM
1

Can you point out specifically what makes the new version "hateful"? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:59 PM
2

Are you saying that crying and baking make a man effeminate/gay?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:58 PM
3

Do you have a copy of the original for comparison?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 05:21 PM
2

I love it. I hope I get to live here forever.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 12:41 AM
2

I saw RVIVR. They were great!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:33 PM
3

Pretty sure. www.thefestfl.com
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:00 PM
8

Well it is certainly nice to see /r/mensrights and /r/twoxchromosomes agree on something.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:58 PM
2

i <3 to fest. This year was my 10th fest (i live in the area.)
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:56 PM
13

I agree with all your points. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:21 PM
3

fuck yea fest! did you go?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:14 PM
58

I interpreted it as saying that taking steps to eliminate gender roles helps both men and women. The reverse side of the poster is a gender bend coloring book.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:54 PM
1

There is a thread on /r/twoxchromosomes right now about rape victim resources for men so try there.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:14 PM
3

I can't watch videos. Do you have a non-video source for the claim that increased child support awards increases child support enforcement costs?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:31 PM
5

the local court system does get 66% of it's costs related to collecting child support, reimbursed by the feds. That alone is quite an incentive, in these days of tight budgets, for the courts to award maximum child support to the custodial parent. It costs the same to enforce a $50 a month support arrangement as it does for a $5,000 a month support arrangement. The amount of support ordered has little to no effect on enforcement. I don't see how the feds paying money to the states to enforce chi…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:25 PM
2

66% of costs related to CS reimbursed. Costs related to CS have little to do with the amount of CS ordered. This involves things like hearings, court officers, etc... State IV-D child support enforcement program operational costs are currently reimbursed through grant funding under this program (IV-D, sec. 655) at a rate of 66% for enforcement activities, 80% for technology costs, and 90% for genetic testing costs. http://achildsright.typepad.com/followthemoney.pdf
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:22 PM
3

I mean a source showing that judges are receiving kickbacks for ordering childsupport in excess of child support guidelines.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:03 PM
1

Do you have a source that isn't a video?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:35 PM
1

It has been implied that they offered him no jail time because the prosecution couldn't win the case after the victim committed suicide. The issue with this is that if the prosecution had no chance, why wouldn't he just risk trial? "Oh, you have no case against me? I guess I'll just admit everything." The lack of testimony is a non-issue. When a witness dies, her prior testimony is admissible in court. The charges were first levied 2 years before her death. The judge in the sentencing hearing, i…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:12 PM
1

offering no jail time just so they can get a win under their belt. It doesn't count as a "win" because the charges get dropped. If anything, it counts as a "loss" since there was an arrest but no charge. I don't think such a thing is in line with due process. The idea behind due process is the choice of process. If the accused chose to skip a trial and accept the deferred prosecution agreement or plea bargain, then they have made use of due process. IF they deny any agreement and choose to go to…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 10:09 PM
1

A person is not forced into a deferred prosecution option. Much like a plea deal, the accused can choose to accept it or deny it and then go to trial.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:28 PM
1

Do you happen to have links to the studies?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:18 PM
1

Rambold entered into a deferred prosecution deal with the prosecution. Deferred prosecution means that if you do X list of things, then the charges are dropped. This is very popular in some areas, especially for minor crimes such as drug possession. In this case, the Rambold had the following agreement: In July 2010, Rambold entered a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with prosecutors that said the charges would be dismissed if Rambold completed a sex offender treatment program and met o…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:49 PM
1

what are some ways a woman could rape a man? By having sexual intercourse or engaging in sodomy (oral, anal, manual) without his consent.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:37 PM
2

The laws that dictate child support are not the same laws that dictate the validity of surrogacy contracts.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:37 PM
1

My husband and I didn't meet until he was 34 and had been single for over 10 years....FWIW he never finished school, though recently he's been thinking about going back. He wants to be a stay at home dad, but wants to work from home as well. He can't really do that with his current skill set.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:31 PM
3

Many statutes provide that whoever carries the fetus is the mother by default, regardless of the physical makeup of the fetus. The surrogate (in many places) can keep the baby if they choose to.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:26 PM
2

You don't think that acceptance of stay-at-home dads is a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:32 PM
1

In civil court the standard is "more likely than not" or "51% chance they were lying." So thejudge thought it was "more likely than not" that they were lying.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:18 PM
10

A surrogate. While there aren't many laws dealing w/ surrogates, it is common enough. Though certain issues come into play: when both parents are known, it is very difficult for one parent to give up custody/get their parental rights taken away. It would be far easier to find someone who is already pregnant and try to adopt the baby or adopt an already born child/orphan.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:10 PM
0

Most of my clients are in situations where neither parent has to pay support. So yes, it does happen, if the parent wants the time. The clients we have where a parent does pay support, it is because that parent chose to have less than 40% time or the child chose. We do have a case right now in appeals where the court ignored the child support guidelines and I'm confident we'll win as the judge blatantly ignored the statute (and was likely sleeping with opposing counsel.)
/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:14 PM
0

Can you imagine having to wait a year to see a judge to resolve a minor issue? Right now it takes anywhere from 3 to 9 months to get through the court system as far as custody is concerned. This is with only about 10% of cases actually being resolved by the court. Increasing the amount of cases that have to go through the court just prolongs the process for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:47 AM
3

I'm sure there is a health insurance plan out there that doesn't cover pregnancy associated costs. She may buy that plan. Before Obamacare, many insurance policies did not cover maternity/OB costs. That was a separate package that one had to buy.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 10:17 PM
1

I'm sorry. I don't understand your point.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:54 PM
1

Well you could always go the route of OP and petition for more time with the child. Or try to come up with a new stipulated parenting plan. Is your time court ordered or via agreement?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:32 PM
0

Well one thing is certain, inaction means less time with your child.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:16 PM
9

is there a good reason to charge women more than men? Because a woman might possibly have a baby someday. ETA: Also, women, statistically, live longer than men and thus need more healthcare.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:59 PM
1

Do you think it would be a good idea to file for an appeal and hope that will motivate her to negotiate further with me? Ultimately this is a question for your lawyer. I don't know all the facts nor the laws of your state. If I could determine a 50% chance of winning, I would appeal (if you were my client.) However, if you appeal, and win, the entire process basically starts over (rehearing/remand.) So attorney's fees are going to increase for her and you. She will also have to pay for her attor…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:49 PM
0

the courts claim that visitation and support $$$ are not tied together This is not true in at least some jurisdictions. In Florida, child support is calculated using the time spent with the child and a percentage of income. Once either parent has 40% or more time, no support is ordered.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:39 PM
1

Appeals are time consuming and thus costly. The appeal is winnable if the attorney can prove that the judge made an error. Did you request the hearing be transcribed/recording? Most family law cases aren't, and that is what makes an appeal difficult. What state are you in? Usually child support is calculated a percentage of both parents' incomes (at least in Florida it is) so getting a higher paying job will only result in paying more support. As for not hearing your petition, it is certainly po…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:21 PM
8

but you wasted no time in trying to steer the conversation towards woman not having enough privilege. Um how? I honestly do not see how describing abortions in a discussion about abortion is discussing "privilege." If I wanted to stoke that fire, there is no shortage of facts and figures I could've trotted out. there will always be more services available for woman than man. That has nothing to do with my post above.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 09:07 PM
14

I wasn't making a comment on women's healthcare. I was merely explaining the state of abortion in the western world. Female healthcare privilege is codified within Obamacare, yet you say nothing about it. Because I was talking specifically about abortion. Sorry for trying to stay on topic.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:54 PM
5

Well, first of all, a fetus isn't a baby. That aside, here is a good essay exploring this argument. The gist is that no one has a right to hijack another person's body against their will. A fetus doesn't have a greater right to it's mother's body than the mother does. So, even if a fetus is considered a person, it is irrelevant as far as bodily autonomy goes. Perhaps one day medical science will create a way to remove an unwanted fetus from a woman's body without having to destroy it. http://spo…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:39 PM
18

It is very difficult to get an aboriton in many places. Long waiting periods, costly extraneous ultrasounds, etc. In some states there is only 1 (or even no) clinic. In Texas they are about to shut down all but 5 abortion providers. Many states have tried to ban abortions by making the "point of viability" conception. Also, government support "crisis pregnancy centers" which look like abortion providers, but aren't. They spread information such as "Abortion causes breast cancer" and other falsit…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 08:29 PM
2

There is some man bashing that goes on there, but more in the vein of specific men/relationships as opposed to "men are dogs" type comments. So, for example, someone may post about a bad date, or getting cat called, and those specific men may be called jerks. I honestly don't know why TwoX gets bashed all the time for being extremist. Especially considering that articles like the one above are posted rather frequently considering it is a women's sub.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:23 PM
12

A lot of people, esp. around here, consider TwoX to be a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:19 AM
1

Are you assuming I'm female? (Had a hard time trying to parse your statement.) If so, are you insinuating that men don't get raped? They do and gets taken even less seriously than when women get raped.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 09:50 PM
1

Wow, spoken like someone who has never been raped! Society bent over backwards real good for me when I was hushed by police and told not to ruin a young man's life over such a small mistake (raping me.)
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:12 PM
0

Watch out! You just disrupted the anti-feminist circlejerk!
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:59 PM
0

There is a bit of difference between "Finally Mr. Speaker, I'm flattered that you're all so interested in my vagina, but 'no' means 'no.'" and "My coworkers raped me."
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:49 PM
0

She has specifically stated that she isn't a feminist, so I have no idea where you are getting that from. I think this sub needs to focus less on the anti-feminist circle jerk and more on the discussion and promotion of men's rights. sigh I though you guys were finally moving away from that, but I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:38 PM
-1

lol. There is nothing feminist about Adria Richards, but okay. I think there are a lot of misconceptions on modern feminism held by the people of this sub, but I don't want to get into an argument about. Adria Richards is an asshole, plain and simple. Asshole knows no gender. The jokes weren't even sexist, they were just sexual.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:12 AM
6

The top comment on the TwoX thread about this is calling her out on her hypocrisy. Granted, TwoX isn't "feminist" but it is heavily populated by women.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:16 PM
1

I don't see where in the article it justifies the following: male teachers and female mechanics usually get promoted to management easier.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:15 PM
3

Do you have a source for this?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:04 AM
2

Come to the south. A professor at my law school said that women should only be trophy wives.... ETA: He said this in class, during lecture.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:54 AM
1

Part of the problem is that unfounded accusations are lumped in with false ones. So just because there wasn't any evidence, doesn't mean that it was a false allegation.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:07 PM
0

I'm not defending the actions in the story, I'm defending the right of the story to exist.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:38 PM
-1

Nowhere does Lolita say it was a good thing. Because she isn't the one telling the story. Humbert seems to despise himself It doesn't change the fact that from his point of view she was seducing him. Considering Esler's disgusting "interview" with a six year old girl in which she asks "what does your vagina smell like?" What about the question about the hat? Does that also imply pedophilia? Are all questions involving sensory perception of one's own anatomy sexual in nature? I don't think she co…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:57 PM
0

Exactly, yet either you must defend her, or drop your defense of the vagina monologues, since they are isomorphic situations. Well, I'm not a feminist. Am I not allowed to enjoy two different pieces of art for different reasons? Sure, but you are defending the work of art for a reason. Because I like art and enjoy hearing about a plethora of human experiences. Is female rape not a big deal? All rape is a big deal. Who raped howard roark? He raped his future wife! That was my point. In the novel,…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:45 PM
0

Good job ignoring my question. :thumbs up:
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:35 PM
-1

Have you come across anything that celebrates VM specifically for promoting lesbian pedophilia? I haven't, and I love to see something to this effect. Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:24 PM
0

I have no audio, I did try to watch the video but without audio it was impossible to watch. But do you know where I can find a copy of the Penis Monologues? I'd love to read it.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:13 PM
-1

I would find it suspect for a feminist to be defending the Fountainhead as Ayn Rand was anti-feminist. That being said, defending a piece of art is not the same as defending its message. but im supposed to believe that when a woman does it, its either beneficial, or hilarious, or impossible. Unless it is Howard Roark? Ultimately, doesn't the opinion of the victim matter the most? If the victim found it a good experience, who are we to question those feelings? (esp in regards to VM where it is th…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:02 PM
0

Lolita presented the pedophilia as horrifying and the man perpetrating it as a monster. The story is told from the POV of Humbert who views Lolita has a seductress...It may be interpreted as him being a monster, but in the book itself, Lolita is the one "seducing" him.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:52 PM
-1

You are completely missing the point that the victim of the rape felt that it was a good rape, not the author. The author was just passing on the story. The fact is when VM talks about this stuff its only ever positive, usually relentlessly explicitly positive, never negative. As is the case with most literature, it only presents one point of view. Such as the view that it is okay to present a young girl as a seductress (Lolita). Or should every piece of questionable art or literature now have a…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:34 PM
-2

Again there is no way the author could get away with any of this and not be seen as a paedophile if it were written by a man. You mean like the book Lolita?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:47 PM
-2

Yes it would actually mean that, if it was treated the same way VM is treated. In a sense, hasn't it? I mean, there is no VM movie. VM doesn't come in conversations on a daily basis. There is no VM meme. Most people have never read or even heard of VM yet nearly everyone knows who Patrick Bateman is. You still ignore the fact that it is describing all this from the point of view of lesbian relationships. How is that relevant? "if it was rape, it was a good rape". No kind of suggestion that actua…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:36 PM
-2

You are conflating two entirely different events though. There was the interview with the 6 year old about her thoughts about her vagina, and then is the story of a 13 year old and her feelings about her own rape. Two different girls, two different stories....they are just in the same anthology... So no, I'm not ignoring your points, you are just talking about two different stories as if they were one and the same.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:26 PM
-2

its not like the context was educational gynecology Nope it wasn't. She wasn't educating this girl. She was asking the girl questions about her own opinions about her own vagina. Reason for asking how her vagina smells? It is a sensory question. The answer was snowflakes. I don't understand how this is somehow indicative of the interviewer being a pedophile. It isn't as if she asked something like "does it feel good when you touch it?" or "can I touch your vagina?" Both of which are clearly sexu…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:16 PM
-2

The whole comparison to Lolita is a false comparison. A better comparison is The Fountainhead where a woman was raped and had positive thoughts about it. And the Fountainhead is something studied and celebrated extensively. Now, if the section of VM had been told from the perspective of the Rapist, then perhaps the Lolita comparison would be more accurate, but even then it isn't b/c Lolita is a work of fiction whereas VM tells actual stories. Furthermore, Lolita is considered one of the greatest…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:05 PM
-2

How you think this makes any difference is beyond me. Because otherwise you are saying that feelings of a victim are invalid. If someone thought that their statutory rape was a positive thing for them, who are you to say otherwise? These are real feelings that a real victim experienced. Furthermore, because a young girl was interviewed about her body and the interviewee loves vagina, she must be a pedophile? I love vagina because I have one, and enjoy talking about it. If I talk to a young girl …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:55 PM
4

If only Florida were this diligent about enforcing child support across the board. The mothers of my niece and nephew each owe thousands in support, and the father of my assistant's child owes over $10,000 and will only work under the table as to avoid garnishment.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:09 PM
0

They don't like a disruption of the "feminists ruin everything!" circlejerk.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:07 PM
-5

Are these anywhere near as celebrated as the Vagina Monologues? In my personal experience, the Fountainhead is read by more people. It was required reading when I was in HS. (Ayn Rand is known as being anti-feminist BTW.) Do colleges host a Lolita day every year? What would you think popular opinion would be of someone who suggested doing such? They might, I'm not sure. However, the difference b/w Lolita and VM is that VM is from the perspective of the victim, while Lolita is told from the persp…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:57 PM
-8

Imagine if we had a play about male sexuality and the only boy who was sexually involved with a man said it was a good experience, and we didn't add in a single account of an abused boy who suffered? What about it? If an artist felt like collecting these stories and making a play about them, I doubt anyone would try to stop them. Especially if they were true stories told from the perspective of the victim. I'd love to watch a play called the penis monologues about the sexual abuse/sexuality of m…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:46 PM
-11

I think it is disingenuous to reference that segment of the play, as it was based on actual story and the victim was the one who said it was "good." A victim is allowed to feel however they want about their abuse. The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could, in which a woman recalls memories of traumatic sexual experiences in her childhood and a self-described "positive healing" sexual experience in her adolescent years with an older woman. This particular skit has sparked outrage, numerous controver…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:31 PM
1

Depending on the jurisdiction, parents can come to a mutually agreed situation, they can bypass the court entirely. Here in Florida parents are required to go to mediation and encouraged to come to an amicable situation. Also, in Florida there is no default. Either you come to an agreement or the court decides for you. (Also, while the court may choose to deviate from child support guidelines, they must justify it in writing and must stick to the requirements of the statutes. By default if the n…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:17 PM
5

It isn't the law that needs overhauling. In many, if not all, states, the law is completely 100% nongendered. The issues arise when you have 60 year old, good old boy judges who still have 1950s gender roles in their heads.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:37 PM
1

It is as if rape has never ever been discussed/glorified in a piece of art or literature....
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:49 PM
2

Female characters describes being raped by a man as a good thin This happens in The Fountainhead.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:23 PM
0

If you look at the front page of 2xc you will see the following posts: Questions about lotion, questions about motherhood, questions about dating, birth control, and eating/dieting. (keep in mind that 2x is not a feminist sub, just a women's sub.) Notice how none of these posts attack men or even bring up men generally (except the dating posts.) Even in comments, men as a group aren't attacked. Men/MRAs are only attacked when they come in and specifically attempt to derail/shift threads for the …
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:31 PM
1

SRS is a circle jerk sub and not representative of the feminist movement. If MRAs insist on focusing on the extreme fringes of the movement, then it shouldn't be surprising when people focus on the extreme fringes of the MR movement. (Such as manhood academy and the like.) To an outsider, this sub just looks like a place to whine about women and feminists rather than a space for constructive discussion of men's rights, and frequently gets lumped in with SRS as a counterpart to SRS. Is that reall…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:58 PM
0

I'm starting to think that the MR movement is less about men's rights and more about bashing feminists.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:02 PM
1

What law school did you go to? I'd ask for a refund if you seriously think that after a person is arrested no more evidence will be collected.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:54 PM
-26

All those 60 year old men on the bench must be feminists....
/r/MensRights06/02/13 09:25 PM
1

I don't understand your question.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:23 PM
1

The collection of evidence is to assist the trier of fact in making a determination regarding guilt. If they don't collect evidence merely because the person is already in custody, then that person is going to walk free once a trial a presented, or even before if a judge RoRs them.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:37 PM
1

Is it though? Skimming the actual manual, at least one other type of crime has a "arrest first" guideline Arrest is the preferred response in partner or family member assault cases involving injury to the victim, use or threatened use of a weapon, violation of restraining order, or other imminent danger to the victim. Section 5.1 (http://www.ci.missoula.mt.us/archives/141/Current%20MPD%20Policy%20Manual.pdf) Now, this may be a different manual than the one in the article above, as I found no men…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:02 AM
0

What practical difference does it make whether the police suspect guilt or assume guilt? Both times the suspect will get arrested/interviewed/investigated and evidence will be gathered. Especially when it concerns public safety, the police are going to arrest now and ask questions later. That is their job, to protect the public.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:44 AM
1

Innocent until proven guilty only applies in a court of law/trial, not during arrest/investigation. Otherwise, no one would ever be arrested as trial is where "proof" occurs.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:35 AM
1

Arrest and prosecution are different. they should never prosecute a case with the assumption that the person is guility. That is essentially how every prosecution goes. The prosecutor needs to convince the jury of the guilt of the accused. If the prosecutor didn't go with the presumption of guilt, then they wouldn't be doing their job or they wouldn't be bringing charges/going to trial at all.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:32 AM
1

Can you elaborate please?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:30 AM
1

It doesn't change the fact that the presumption of innocence doesn't attach until trial. If everyone is presumed innocent at arrest, there would be no arrests, ever.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:28 AM
1

...This is a dilemma present in literally every court for every crime. We have this crazy thing called "evidence" that has to be presented on most cases to (crazy thing) "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" a persons guilt. Arrest and investigation happen long before any of that comes up.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:48 AM
6

That only applies to burden of the prosecution to prove a case. That is, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt (for the most part) that the defendant committed the crime. So unless the prosecution can show the jury that the defendant is "proven guilty" then the defendant will be "innocent." This burden does not apply to police, otherwise there would never any arrests ever.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:45 PM
0

I'm sure he is going to appeal/appealed as Florida law specifically bars non-temporary alimony unless it is impossible for the receiver to ever earn an income (such as a disability.) I'm sure this Anderson person appealed as it is clear the judge made an error.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:09 PM
2

It's wanking when a girl does it....
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:45 AM
1

Well right, there are all those things, but there are also a lot more court documents, and in some cases, they even require a hearing.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:58 PM
4

OH, you mean more like this: http://cdn.mommyish.com/files/2011/08/mybestsubjects.png Also, you didn't ask for an identical item, you asked for an item which was sexist towards women in a bashing way. Some would argue that a joke which preys on the fact that for centuries women had to serve men is worse than calling a man "Brainless" (especially in a world where the top scientific/academic roles/minds are held by men, while in many places women are still "making sandwiches" for the men.)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:05 PM
2

That's the point of this article. A man can change their name, but they must jump through a lot of hoops. However, for the woman, she just puts her new name on the marriage paperwork. However, with the increase in gay marriage, more and more states are going to be making it much easier for anyone getting married to change their name.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:21 PM
2

Nope. All the dad I know who do it do it because the mom has a great job. Also, day care is very expensive, so it is cheaper to have one parent stay home. It just so happens that I know a lot of women who make good money so the father is parent who stays home. (Even my dad only worked part time to be able to take care of us after school.) All the stay at home moms i've known (albeit, they were few) called themselves that.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:11 PM
1

The woman can sue whoever she wants, but will she be able collect from two fathers? No. Unless she has some sort of multi-state scam going, but even that may be hard to pull off.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:07 PM
2

You don't lose your property rights just for being an asshole.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:09 PM
1

A person in a relationship makes contributions that aren't necesarrily monitary, so it isn't really fair to say "Especially if they didn't do the work to buy most of it?". but when somebody fucks up and is to blame, why should they get an even amount of stuff? Why shouldn't they? It's their stuff.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:01 PM
1

The situation in the OP aside, when you are married it is "our" stuff, not "my" stuff. Hence the 50-50. Whether someone cheated or not, they are still entitled to their portion of the shared assets. (Prenups aside.)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:38 PM
2

Actually most states are no-fault divorce.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:37 PM
3

There is no such thing (in most places) as "at-fault" divorce....
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:36 PM
3

Here is the reasoning: child support is considered the legal right of the child. If a man raises another man's child (whether willing or not), for all intents and purposes, that child will consider him her father. Thus, even though the parents are divorced, that child will still see him as her father, and she is entitled to parental support from him (whether in money or actually caregiving.)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:35 PM
0

The funny thing it isn't even an argument. It is a statement of what the law is. Though, as a lurker and very infrequent commenter I have noticed that if you say anything against the circlejerk you are downvoted. Whether you are right or not. I personally think that is the reason why this movement/sub is largely ridiculed/ignored. Rather than focus on real issues that affects the rights of men, the front page is full of "women are cheating whorez" or just bashing women and feminists in general.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:34 PM
5

You mean like this: http://www.amazon.com/Story-Babe-Sandwich-T-shirt-Statements/dp/B005NCALA4 (Also available at WalMart.)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:28 PM
3

I know more stay at home dads than stay at home moms....just sayin', things are changing.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:24 PM
0

Very well said.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:22 PM
1

It's closer to $300 to file, and lawyers are allowed, but it is atypical. (Source: I'm a lawyer working on a small claims case atm.) Though it ultimately does vary by state.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:20 PM
0

Alimony isn't forever. It is typically for a set number of months/years. It varies by state,but for example, in Florida, there are several types of alimony but they are all temporary. Also, regardless of the set number of years, the alimony ends when the receiver gets married. Edit: Permanent alimony may be awarded if it is impossible for the receiving spouse to earn his or her own income. Edit: One of the few subs where facts are downvoted.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:09 PM
2

It's almost as if different people have different opinions and 2x isn't all just one person/mentality.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter