LimaFoxtrotGolf Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. There's a reason that orthodox Islam explicitly allows for and encourages having 4 wives. Even to normies. You're way off the mark here. Excess men were sent overseas to spread the seed. The Imperial core would almost never see their return. The Romans would throw rows of barbarians at the enemy before the legions engaged. Retard level shit. Roman heavy infantry, especially prior to the Marian reforms, were all Roman citizens of middle to high status that were required to be land owners. If you …	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:18 AM
1	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. No they don't. Maybe you're just too low IQ to understand. Present to me a specific contradiction so I can help you understand Barney Style.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:17 AM
1	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Based I was one of those men that signed up to fight the incel armies that enslaved and gr*ped women But looking forward? Not my problem. I'll take my money, wealth, and productivity and move somewhere else that wants no part in the fighting and where the women are more agreeable and enthusiastic and want to be actual women (read: most of the world outside of the West) Let American women fight the ISIS-K army and terrorist that want to subject them to Sharia law. I'll move to Uruguay and raise a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:15 AM
0	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. He was settling. You just refused to accept reality.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/10/24 07:12 AM
1	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. It doesn't, they just end up engaging in homosexuality at higher rates in those countries. Also that's why passport broing doesn't work in more militant societies. Docile Thailand and Philippines, sure - not in Afghanistan. Passport bros would be strung up.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:45 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. You're forgetting that the draft would only come up in a situation with an existential threat in the future. The majority of the voting population is women. If the hypothetical ISIS superpower threatening the world and global Sharia law were to arise, of course women would vote to send men to war so they don't lose all their rights. There you go, now the majority of the electorate would enthusiastically send 19 year old Joe Blow off to go get blown up by a $70 Temu drone somewhere in the Levant.…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:42 AM
5	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. The solution for a long time was social norms for monogamy and marriage. Since the sexual revolution took that away, your only solution is to... let men do what they used to do? I guess, I don't know.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:35 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Nah man just Genghis Khan shit	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:32 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. I don't think you understand my comment	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:29 AM
1	Why don't women care about promiscuous slutty men? Not even close to reality. You're delusional.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:27 AM
1	Why don't women care about promiscuous slutty men? No. Look at the studies that show what percentage of women and men reproduced before the spread of western Catholic monogamy. Western monogamy and marriage as we know it is a social construct to bring a greater percentage of men into the fold and get them invested in their communities.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 07:26 AM
1	Why don't women care about promiscuous slutty men? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249686430_Feminism_and_the_Invisible_Fat_Man You can find lots of content out there with fat women saying they shouldn't be expected to date fat men. Here's an analogous statement to your comment. There are similar rates of below average height men and women but men don't complain about below average height women nearly as much as women complain about below average height men (5'4" for women and 5'9" for men in the United States). No men are height shamin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 04:50 AM
1	Why don't women care about promiscuous slutty men? A certain group seems to be "perpetually enraged" about men's age preferences when it has nothing to do with them. Leo's not going to date you anyways, so just "move on."	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 04:37 AM
1	Why don't women care about promiscuous slutty men? Thing is, if a woman is looking for a sexless man, get an incel. There's a lot of them. But there's a reason nobody wants them.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 04:31 AM
1	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Out of the 4 billion people in the world you couldn't find one who was "nice and seemed to genuinely like you." Including the ugly, short, broke men?	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:53 AM
4	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. You know shit's getting bad when Western governments ditch woke recruiting ads and start targeting straight white males again. "Hey, we might need people to actually, you know, fight and die."	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:50 AM
5	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Right, just as having others ensuring your physical safety, sovereignty, access to food and modern infrastructure are privileges. Those loser men aren't entitled to sex nor romantic love. You are not entitled to their labor or service in times of war. But we see how gender equity goes right out the window with Ukraine's very sexist draft policy.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:48 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. It really wouldn't. Ukraine showed us how modern drafts are actually really easy, and Ukraine's monopoly on violence and central power are nowhere near good ole Uncle Sam's. The most desperate extreme is the old Soviet method, or empires of antiquity. You know, go or die. And for some empires, it was go or your entire family dies.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:44 AM
3	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. I have no doubts once again western men will be sent to remove or eliminate the terrorist incel army . Thing is, western men are increasingly just saying "no thanks." Good luck to everyone else when there aren't enough western men to rise up and stop the future incel armies. They'll just think to themselves, "not my problem."	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:42 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. That's historically what excess men have done. Then they go places where they can take by force what they want.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:40 AM
5	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Monogamy was part of the social contract. Don't be violent and be a good obedient member of society and you can have your wife too. Additionally, be a contributing member to society, do the hard dangerous labor, and go to war when asked to. This is why you see the rise in NEET men. Not just in the West. China has it even worse right now (Lay Flat / Let It Rot movements). And honestly, can't blame them. No work, no taxes, no contributing to society. They exist for themselves and themselves only. …	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:36 AM
8	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. Those "men in the past" went to foreign lands to enslave men for labor and women for procreation. Don't whitewash history.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:33 AM
2	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. They were sent to war to conquer foreign lands, kill and enslave the men for labor, and enslave the women for... family creation activities.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:31 AM
5	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. It's historic reality. It tracks with domestic instability, and why a good gauge on foreign aggression and expanionist military behavior outside of existentional threats (eg massive draughts across the Eurasian steppe causing the Huns and the Mongols to move westward) is how many excess young men there are. The pressure valve throughout all of human history was to send the excess young men away to war, where they could go kill the men of another tribe and take their women as slaves or die trying…	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:30 AM
4	There’s nothing wrong with high standards. That wouldn't be acceptable today. Because what that meant was a bunch of young men going off to another tribe or country, killing all their men, and bringing back the women as slaves. A bunch of incel western men going to third world countries and massacring all the men and bringing back the women as slaves is what you're advocating for.	/r/PurplePillDebate	11/10/24 03:27 AM