TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LimitFantastic2040 Archive

View 1 post and 31 comments by LimitFantastic2040 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Thank you 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 02:29 AM
55

I don't want to rain on your thought parade, but it is a 2-way street many times. The man comes home, why is dinner not ready or why does it take you so long to get ready to go out or you need to gain weight or whatever. Sometimes, it boils down that the dating stage one or both put on their best to impress. You wanna make the other see you like a peacock in full plumage. The saying, "Familiarity breeds contempt," is fitting. There will always be behaviors or interests that are not shared, and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 02:25 AM
2

This from an NRA blog, “As a military logistician, my units had around 20% female personnel in both officer and enlisted ranks. All the women fired Expert their first day, but less than a third of the men did so,” said retired Col. Kenneth Haynes. “Several men had to retrain and repeat the course to qualify. This pattern continued when the 9mm replaced the .45 in 1985 until I retired in 1997. It also appeared differences in musculature and hand size had no effect on the scores.” Col. Haynes also…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 02:09 AM
–

And your response there explains to me why flat-Earthers exist. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 12:29 AM
1

I agree with your statement, but to give a touch of "Hmmm?" Into it - nurture has been shown to be the root of many serial killers and that their brain patterns shared similar anomalies. Women and men have shown differences in brain waveforms. The question is how much the male/female brainwave/structure differences are based on nurture as opposed to biological, evolutionary, or other non-nurture causes.?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 12:24 AM
1

Chess, darts ( in many instances), sharpshooting, there are a few others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:32 PM
0

Men have higher IQ's than women, it's been a fact for as long as measuring IQ's I'm just curious. Could you link me to the studies that show this "fact"? I think newer ones than 1905 would have better peer-reviewed conclusions,. Please and thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:00 PM
0

I'm not being argumentative, just curious. Can you link me a source for , Thing is that there are a lot more men in the extremes than women. I like reading
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:52 PM
1

What's with the hate? Are you incapable of mature discourse, or is it another issue(s) you are dealing with?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:43 PM
1

the mean for males is 4 IQ points higher than the mean for females. Not exactly a crippling difference..
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:38 PM
1

Yup, I see the logical reason for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:36 PM
1

Well, you got me there. But the difference does not reflect the mindsport outcomes The mean for males is 4 IQ points higher than the mean for females.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:33 PM
-1

It's true the 2s is two-spirited, unique to indigenous. The plus I can't remember, but it's there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:29 PM
2

If I am delusional, I stand with a third of the top researchers. Just the facts. May I ask why you seem to be so aggressive in your comments? I don't think I stooped to insulting anyone. If I did, it is possibly a reflection of an insult towards me, but nothing too odious. Not at all. From answers here and deeper reading, I see the reasons behind the lower top players in many mindsports being women. I posted a paragraph from a family indepthbarticle in a reply to another commenter in this post a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:19 PM
1

From reading the last couple of hours, intelligence per se is not an issue. It is more to do with not having the high competitiveness that males have more of. Not saying women are not competetive, but not to the same extent. Each tend to have different ficus on 5hought and intensity. Herevisca copy-passte f4om a fairly deep but worthwhile read. There were significant differences between women and men in all six subscales of the SD-WISE (all p < 0.05, Figure 1B and Table 1). These differences var…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:14 PM
2

THIS. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 11:15 AM
1

I did assume you to be testosterone based as your self-defeating limiters. I did not expect. Notch one up to a deviation of objectivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 11:13 AM
2

Actually, I am leftist, and unlike right leaning ppl, I will alter views when presented with scientific or logically based arguments. Both sides of my debate have top research supporting their sides and the jury is still out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 11:10 AM
3

Yeah I spent an hour in some major journal publications, and even the top respected ones had differing opinions. Yes,the female and male brain are different. The majority though boiled down to evolution - male need to be more competitive, hunt, get mates, etc - .women tended to not have the drive to practice enough, motivation is lower,and others. But a lot of published research questioned to the ongoing sexism and harassment overt and covert. And the studies will continue. Nature vs nurture all…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 11:03 AM
2

I work in the military, sir is used for both when addressing an officer. Just habit
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:16 AM
2

If you say so, sir.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:13 AM
1

I ran a gr1-8 chess club, and there was pretty even across grade levels 55% boys, so more, but like like you are saying. 76 kids, 42 were boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:12 AM
2

Never is a long time . But someday maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:08 AM
4

Sports being muscle focused is not the same at all. But as you brought it up, rifle competitions is another where it has nothing to do with anything below the neck (arms obv exception)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 10:03 AM
2

Who said remove. It is a game they can compete on equal footing (or heading, as it may be).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:57 AM
0

Started with the sufragettes, early 20th century Closer to 120 years upon inspection. "The term "suffragette" was coined by a reporter in the Daily Mail in 1906 as an insult for the WSPU members. However, the name stuck and was used by the members of the WSPU themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:51 AM
3

Yes. I do believe females are still pressured to "stay in your comfort zone " and then be told what that comfort zone is. It's not ladylike to be competitive, etc. In WWII, it was Russian women who excelled as snipers. In Britain, women were as codebreakers. That could be argued because the men were busy fighting. Who's to say? If people don't have the challenge to get higher achievement, they won't get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:47 AM
-1

Perhaps the solution to that is analogous to language immersion. Gender fluid competitions without a fallback segregated option. After all, the feminist movement has passed the 100-year struggle for equality. In brain competitions, is it not time that they compete as a human and not as gendered group. If thrown into the deep end, I believe they will learn to swim faster and have a higher goal and motivation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:30 AM
-1

I tend to agree with a caveat. Women in general have been and still are, unwanted in many professions. And equality for them is still a long way off. Is it merit or sexism that they do not have higher numbers in top positions corporate and professional wise?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:20 AM
7

The top may have been men, just by numbers, chess was promoted as a manly game, and girls were usually shunned, so few wanted to deal with the toxicity
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:11 AM
5

Pia Cramling may not have hit world champ, but has been a grandmaster for 30 yrs
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 09:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter