TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Linsolv Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by Linsolv on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Not necessarily true. Just because companies are not required to provide maternity leave, it doesn't logically follow that therefor they never do.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:20 PM
4

And on the other side of the line we have Wimbledon's recent widely-lauded decision to start paying women the same for 3/5s the work.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:18 PM
5

Never mind that almost 40 percent of rape reports in the military are found after an independent investigation to be baseless.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:57 PM
2

The problem is that it's not just something that's difficult to prove, it's something that cannot be proven. It's like the argument that people eat McDonalds at the expense of eating other things because they can't help it, so we need to ban McDonalds. I can point out anecdotal evidence that suggests that 100 people, or 150 people, or 1000 people, who eat McDonalds to excess know exactly what they're doing to themselves, and it's not a matter of blaming someone else, but of making decisions they…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:20 PM
1

And when there is significant evidence, there's almost always a court case, because in pretty much all western nations that's a crime, and you don't have to have pity on the internet--you can just sue on the basis of gender discrimination and laugh your way to the bank.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:32 PM
6

Not really relevant. Funny though.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:44 PM
1

Did we go to the same high school or is this just a really common thing?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 09:55 PM
0

See, that's the thing. A lot of people make themselves a stranger and then go "it's not fair, nobody likes me!" If nobody knows who you are, they aren't gonna like you. It goes that way for anything. Girl I had in a class once, complained boys didn't like her. She never spoke up in class except to say that, one time. Well why the hell am I supposed to like you? You're a non-person to me, you haven't expressed any thoughts or opinions on anything. Long story short, you don't have to make friends,…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:05 PM
1

Huh. Weird. Eh, I dunno, my whole school experience was pretty cool with nerds and stuff though. I was in the top 5 smartest people in my school (highest ACT score in my class, though there was one guy who beat me a year below me. He was a really smart guy.) and I knew every single person who I'd put on the list. I was also on good terms with the captain of just about every sports team, and most smart people were only put down for being stuck up. So eh.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:21 PM
2

My school district had one of the best high-school bands in the state, so band kids were pretty well-respected in my area, actually.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:04 PM
17

HOW DARE YOU TELL A WOMAN WHAT TO PUT IN HER BODY However onions can be banned for men if you want.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:45 PM
4

Hair pulling is illegal, but an unavoidable consequence. Imagine for instance a triangle choke. By necessity, the choker on the ground has most of his weight on his neck and head. If a fighter with hair longer than an inch or so gets dragged more than a few inches, there's a huge chance his hair sticks to the mat and pulls. Without any ill intentions at all. Or, say, a long-haired fighter is smashed into the side of the cage. It gets pinched between the links, and everything is unhappy for that …
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:01 AM
1

It would take a more self confident man than I to say no.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 09:31 PM
2

You've presented some evidence that suggests that there are at least two factors, so. My anecdotal experience has been that the number of women I find entirely unattractive is few. Most men I have talked to about it essentially agree with my ratings, outside of a few blips here and there--though they may have lower or higher standards than me, which has to be accounted for. This would create the appearance of a consensus, certainly. But your link, which glosses over data (because frankly data is…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:39 AM
1

Sorry, I did use odd wording. There's less of men (or, the male... population?) having only one body type they're attracted to. It's a backwards way to have phrased it. What I meant was, men have diverse interests in women as well. But I said it stupidly.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:17 PM
2

That's somewhat true, but I'd say there's less of that than you'd think. I may be the minority here--I like muscular girls, I like tall girls, I'm engaged to a short girl, I like girls who are thin, girls who are busty, girls who look like boys, girls with tans, girls with pale skin, etc. There's pleeeenty of variety in the kinds of girls I'm attracted to. There is a certain point where I don't have any respect for someone who's not taking even the most basic care of their appearance, but that's…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:00 PM
2

YEP ALL NATURAL
/r/MensRights03/08/13 08:57 PM
4

That is not the thrust of the conversations I have had in the past. If that is the experience you have had then I understand why we've disagreed and you are free to continue to feel however you'd like, but this is where we reach an impasse.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:47 PM
13

No, actually, it did. See, there is a difference between suggesting there is a larger, more sinister problem at work, and suggesting that a problem does not exist. Feminists, or I should say some feminists, choose to deny that there is a problem, and then insist that because no problem exists the discussion should end. Often, these same people will insist that any attempt to discuss such an issue is a form of "derailment," or they will suggest that the solution to this problem is feminism becaus…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:30 PM
31

The phrase they use to denigrate any discussion about He-Man (or the WWE or Superman or whoever you choose to name) is "Male Power Fantasy." It's not considered a "real" problem because men are supposed to look up to these stereotypes, rather than feel like less of a person because they don't meet them.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:13 PM
63

That's half-true. Women like swimmers' builds, but they also like "athletic" builds (Hugh Jackman's build, for example, in any action movie) quite a bit. Which interestingly, is basically what bodybuilders looked like before the advent of anabolic steroids. And like bodybuilders before the advent of anabolic steroids, it's an unrealistic standard to set for men, the best a male body can possibly look without chemical enhancement It's not as unrealistic as Ronnie Coleman, who only got where he is…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:10 PM
4

Read the post above you again, and get past the phrase "male power fantasy."
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:07 PM
10

It's not attempted murder, in the same way that the story posted yesterday about the woman who paid a guy with sex if he would beat her up (so that she could then file rape charges against him, sad story) wasn't a battery case. Because it was consenting.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:07 PM
5

Not disagreeing. But it's not exceptional like being killed by falling pianos is exceptional, it's exceptional like dying is exceptional.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:07 PM
5

Actually yeah, there's a real chance of people misinterpreting stuff like that. My mother used to manage a restaurant, and she likes to tell this story from those days: Wealthy black guy comes in. I don't think there was EVER any doubt about his wealth, I don't remember but he might have been famous??? It was a nice place. Orders his food to-go. Takes three times as long as it should, so he complains to her (because she's the manager on duty). She calls over a waitress and admonishes "Won't some…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 06:25 PM
3

Never minding of course that wives/mothers are considered the primary consumers of the household, and have been for at least a century. And for that matter, the claim 'all the people above her have to be male' is silly. Most corporations are run by boards. That is to say, the highest available position is more than one person. All a woman needs to "sleep her way to the top," in pure theory, is one man above her on the ladder at all times to act as his protege and be carried up. And then at the v…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:12 PM
2

I will concede the point. The source is clearer on the issues I protested.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:20 PM
1

That's not the same thing, though, is it? One is an accusation of rape by a leading advocacy group, while the other is some risk avoidance advice by some blogger. Intent and scale are both quite different. Edit: I could see how you might get confused here. This is a purely analytical piece, you would say. It's not advocating legislation based on this 'definition', and they're only talking about what leads up to rape. Well, that's awfully irresponsible of them to say that they are defining a form…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:29 PM
8

But if we "need to teach men not to rape," then it's clear we should be teaching men what it means to rape, so when you define something that to a well-meaning man is LITERALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE from consenting relations, then that's not the same thing, is it? Let's look at the same situation from multiple angles. Lana is a young woman, barely old enough to drink. She's not with friends tonight, but she went out to watch the football game with the bar that she goes to with her friends. A shifty-…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:32 AM
3

Wasn't there a big hoopla when they announced the Cloud outfit for Lightning in FF15, because it was sexualized? Then on further consideration it was pointed out that the only difference was that Lightning has breasts?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:16 PM
2

I'd personally suggest the difference between those two is survival, as a 20-week-old practically no chance of survival outside the body. Yeah, kinda. Except that at what point can someone be said to "survive" without support from some other entity? Can a person ever be said to achieve that, without withdrawing from society? This is no less arbitrary a cutoff than any other. Pain could philosophically be thought of as a unifying feature of humanity... No, we can't all feel pain. If that's the me…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 08:12 PM
2

Agreed. You've literally described my position. I am pro-choice, but I know enough people who are pro-life that I didn't want to see the topic mischaracterized.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:17 PM
2

You're right. That IS the question. You're right, that is an absurdist argument. I'm not actually going to debate ad absurdum. However, I'll bite. There comes a certain point where we understand it to be a child, sure. But what if there weren't? I mean, what makes man not-an-animal? Is it his ability to think rationally? Then children aren't human until 4 or 5 years old. Hell, not REALLY human until 18 or 20. Does that mean we should be able to abort a two-year-old? Or maybe it's our bipedalism.…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:10 PM
2

Did I not put "devil's advocate" at the top of this argument? Someone made an argument, and I argued it for the sake of representing the opposition, which I'm fully aware of and treat with the same respect I give any person I do agree with. Then someone said I couldn't make an argument that wasn't based on religion, so I made such an argument.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:57 PM
2

Are you suggesting that children are the same person as the mother? My mother will be overjoyed to hear that there are actually 3 of her running around. Or would it be 5 of her mother? I don't know. It's confusing.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:55 PM
2

No, you can make a scientific argument of personhood based on a number of argumentation lines. One common argument is that the Quickening is the beginning of life. This occurs between 6 and 16 weeks, depending on the pregnancy. Another common idea is when the child can live outside the womb, around 25 weeks. As I understand it, this is the measure that current law is based around. But let's look at alternatives, shall we? What defines life outside of humankind? If it's the ability to live in a h…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:17 PM
2

Devil's advocate: Wouldn't it be equally fair to say that some politicians in Texas are working pretty hard to restrict Women's rights to control someone else's body?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:59 PM
2

It's not impossible to get that statistic. I'll suggest a simple metric: When doing your study, look at a statistically significant percentage of DV cases, in a limited enough time period to make it doable. Now ask their friends and coworkers, what percentage of those people knew that this was occurring before it was reported? Now we have a yardstick by which to measure DV by something other than DV reports. Actually, anonymous surveys tend to get lots of unreported cases of criminal activity. B…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:01 PM
1

How is this relevant?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:17 PM
11

Ok. I'm going to try to be clear here again. We have statutory rape laws. Because. CHILDREN. CANNOT. CHOOSE. TO. HAVE. SEX. That's why it's called "rape," and not "consensual sex."
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:50 PM
8

I didn't answer the question because it's apples and oranges. If two adults had consensual, sober sex, then one of them committed a murder, is the man culpable for rape? That's about as on-topic as what you asked. If he committed a murder at the same time, he would be culpable for murder. If Ricci Jones coerced him into committing the murder, a slightly more interesting question, then she would likely be culpable, in the same way that Charles Manson was culpable for the murders committed under h…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:44 PM
8

There's no age of consent on murder. However, the legal justification of the age of consent laws is that people below some age are incapable of understanding the consequences of their actions. And, incidentally, people incapable of understanding the consequences of shooting someone, we call "unfit to stand trial," on the basis that they didn't understand what they were doing, and they do regularly walk free. Because they're not fit to stand trial.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:51 PM
1

The OP was, and when I was half asleep last night it made sense not to check the date.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:18 PM
1

Disagreed and I'll tell you why. It was in a different font face and different color than all the other text on the page. It led naturally to the assumption that it did not belong, and with only a bit of detective work one could safely assume it is added later as a commentary by the creator of the image.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter