TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LipstickPaper Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by LipstickPaper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Nah. I'm good. The point is men having a preference or being exclusively attracted to girls under 15 is not beneficial. The claim that most men are hebephiles or pedophiles isn't true either. Both those things need to be understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 09:35 PM
1

But do most men want that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 06:57 PM
1

It turns out that a 14yo will give a man more offspring than a 25yo or even a 20yo. She can potentially give more offspring but a 20 or 25 year old can currently give him offspring. They are at peak fertility. There is a difference. Reproductive value is not the same as fertility. Teens have low fertility. You need fertility to produce children. You assume men want long term vs short term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 06:43 PM
1

It's true that girls under 18 have higher rates of pregnancy problems And infant mortality. but it doesn't follow from this that attraction to them is maladaptive, If it is primary or exclusive it does. If a man can't find a girl over 14 attractive and refuses to sleep with one how can he have lots of offspring? And pedophiles are primarily or exclusively attracted to girls who aren't even fertile. How is that beneficial? the amount of offspring a man can expect to get from them is greater than …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 05:50 PM
1

Lol now that you said it I can hear it!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 01:06 PM
1

Bluepill is a parody/critic of redpill and redpill's affiliates.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 02:05 AM
2

I do think there are many issues with porn and those issues can be absorbed by the viewers. I thought I wanted rough sex because most straight porn is. So I tried rough sex and I hated it. I stopped during It made me cry after. After that I stopped watching porn. It has helped my sexual appetite.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 02:04 AM
1

That doesn't prove that no women under 17 are ready to give birth. *girls Let us look at the definition of ready: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/ready completely prepared or in fit condition for immediate action or use: Girls are not completely prepared or in fit condition to give birth. Let me show you why they are not ready: The pelvis does not fully widen until the late teens, meaning that young girls may not be able to push the baby through the birth canal. The younger you are, the more tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 07:50 PM
1

I didn't try to pass any opinion off as a fact. You did which is why you asked me for a source. If if was just an opinionion you would have said this. Notice how you didn't actually answer any of the questions I asked in my previous post. You just ignored them. Because you need to accept that young teen girls are not the best for child birth, your questions are you throwing a fit. You want to redirect the conversation and I staying the course. I refuted your claim. You wanted to justify your sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 05:15 PM
1

can't just make a blanket statement that all women under 17 aren't ready because that's false. Females under 18 are called girls. And I did provide contrary evidence to your statement. Generally speaking under 17 aren't biologically ready. Thus the complications. Remember, your answer is an opinion, not a fact. I posted facts. Did you need read anything I posted? You haven't posted anything but opinions you tried to past as facts. I think are having a hard time accepting that teen girls are not …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 02:05 PM
1

Your sources only demonstrate that being under 17 carries an elevated risk of complications. You do not think elevated risk is not even close with not being ready? The reason for the risks is because their bodies are not ready. These risks are not associated with 20 something year old women because they are ready. They don't prove that all women under 17 are not ready to have babies. They are not ready, their bodies need more time to mature. The elevated risks and complications is a sign they ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 01:36 AM
1

Nor are 10-, 11- and 12-year-olds remotely prepared to care for a baby, Wall said. But the risks are physical, as well. "The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 05:31 PM
1

False girls are not ready to have babies under 17 years old. They have complications that women in their 20s tend not to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:24 PM
1

With the influence they hold in the media they have taken every opportunity to paint us as deranged out of control psychopaths totally lacking in compassion or humanity. No you all do that to yourselves. You claimed that adults who said they were abused as children are liars. I>He can join no community and date young girls that he meets. Children are not meant to date adults. Since he has had no guidance and no understanding of his responsibilities in a relationship with someone so young, one ca…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 08:33 PM
16

/r/hebephilia
/r/MGTOW31/12/16 03:16 PM
3

Now seeing your twitter page you are bold enough to argue with someone who has a PhD. Your arrogance is not a substitute for scientific research.
/r/MGTOW28/12/16 03:40 PM
3

I'm trying to have a discussion with you and you seem to only get upset. I'm curious about where you get your information. Can you please share?
/r/MGTOW27/12/16 01:22 AM
8

You're a dumbass. Why are you so angry? Calm down. Lol. Why are you offended when I ask you for a source? I've provided sources. The same principle applies whatever the total amount of offspring a women has. In fact a lower total amount makes it worse since each offspring she has is a bigger fraction of the total she will have. Source? The figure of 8 is just an estimate of the amount of offspring prehistoric women would have had. Assuming a birth rate of 1 every 3.5 years (which is thought to b…
/r/MGTOW25/12/16 03:02 AM
6

I find this topic fascinating now. Not all sources detailed amount of children. How it seems like having around 8 children would not have been common. http://www.popline.org/node/517639 Among hunters and gatherers high natural fertility is maladaptive, meaning that women who gave birth as often as every 2 years have not survived to contribute this high fertility tendency to the current ]Kung Bushman population. Even with 3-year birth spacing the work load of the mother may be sufficiently great …
/r/MGTOW25/12/16 01:05 AM
18

They don't realize this. Most women I know who are virgins actually are very religious and want a man who hasn't slept around nor is a cheater. Most want a virgin and will get one.
/r/MGTOW25/12/16 12:07 AM
10

LOL it's not worth trying to reason with you because you don't understand basic maths or how evolution works. You don't post sources. I don't think you understand how to provide evidence for an argument. When you claim something is a fact you need to provide evidence for it. Prehistoric people didn't have short lifespans. A 12yo girl could be expected to live till about 50 and bear many offspring along the way, more than a 20yo. That doesn't make sense. Being younger does not mean you will have …
/r/MGTOW24/12/16 11:58 PM
11

LOL you're getting attacked for saying this but your intuition that women are somehow at their most valuable about 12-15 is correct. Source? Also his and yours intuition is a sexual disorder. It's not that 12-15 are the best childbearing years Yeah because I proved you wrong on that. but rather that it's the best age for a man to acquire a woman in order to maximize his own reproductive success. Source? In caveman times women wouldn't typically start reproducing and using up their eggs until sev…
/r/MGTOW24/12/16 04:05 PM
6

http://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S8 The increased risks observed among adolescents seems more likely to be associated with biological immaturity, than with socio-economic factors, inadequate antenatal or delivery care. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199504273321701 " In a study of mothers 13 to 24 years old who had the characteristics of most white, middle-class Americans, a younger age conferred an increased risk of adverse pregnanc…
/r/MGTOW24/12/16 07:09 AM
1

Amen. Physically men are more attractive younger, same with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:50 AM
1

Because of your money not your looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:49 AM
1

Men hit it too. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1894016 Recommendations from the literature are interpreted to advise men to have their children before age 40. This suggestion would obviously benefit immediate offspring and perhaps successive generations as well. You are being too simple. If a woman needs a c-section to give birth she can only have 3 pregnancies. Usually this means 3 children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:48 AM
1

Men have limitations too. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/1894016 Recommendations from the literature are interpreted to advise men to have their children before age 40. This suggestion would obviously benefit immediate offspring and perhaps successive generations as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:46 AM
1

Asian women aren't the only ones who avoid hitting the wall until later.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:45 AM
4

Sperm loses quality. Please refer to science not your opinion. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01243.x/full Patients above 40 years of age had significantly high levels of DNA damage (P < 0.001) compared with their counterparts. Patients with varicocele and a history of alcohol consumption had higher incidence of spermatozoa with DNA damage (P < 0.01). http://yourfertility.org.au/for-men/age/ The quality of a man’s sperm decreases with age. As a man ages, it takes lon…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:43 AM
3

I can still get little girls into my bed. Little girls? Ummmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/16 04:24 AM
1

It's not the exception. Men discuss what women do sexually all the time. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 11:58 PM
1

They will. I see men complain about women using sex toys. Men also constantly make remarks about woman's sexual choices. This subreddit being an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 08:23 PM
1

Yeah, I never understand why men don't realize if they get sex robots so do women. In fact I know more women with sex toys than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 07:49 PM
1

Lol booooooo I don't want robots to take over. Maybe Aliens but not robots.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 07:46 PM
1

Why do you think women won't benefit from those robots?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:15 PM
1

Men will too lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 05:15 PM
1

Lmao. Why would a man go for a girl who isn't fertile...when there are fertile women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 08:17 PM
1

If you want to reduce n count of women just make it where men would refuse sex from women unless married. :p takes at least 2 for an n count to rise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:41 PM
1

Fertility is best for men and women in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:37 PM
1

You probably have real reasons why you should be ashamed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/16 05:32 PM
2

Lol Donald's wife is an escort with nudes online.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 05:40 PM
1

Sounds like projection to me...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 05:27 PM
1

lol I know so many reformed sluts who are married and their husbands have no idea. However they are good wives and mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/16 04:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter