TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Litig8 Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by Litig8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Do you practice divorce law?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 07:35 PM
-7

It's 2017 bud.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 01:22 AM
-1

Really not worth the time and effort to refute your post since it's devoid of fact based argument and is entirely emotional. The same lawsuit could have happened if the only fact you change was that they were brother and sister instead of husband and wife. Your outrage at marriage is misplaced
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 01:21 AM
-9

If this the lens through which you view marriage, yes, I definitely encourage you to never get married. It's not for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:51 PM
1

This woman had zero legal connection to this man. They almost certainly have a fiduciary relationship Even if that conversation had taken place. If I say that I'll give you my millions doesn't mean you can sue me to actually get them. He didn't say he would give her a million dollars, he said he would give her 50% of his company if she purchased the home without any contribution on his part. It wasn't the promise of an unconditional gift, it was an agreement. However, even if it was a promise of…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:49 PM
-1

The facts of this lawsuit are more concerned with the equitable enforcement of a promise (i.e. the creation of an constructive trust) rather than entitlement to the money due to some functional marriage equivalent. The relevancy of the fact that they have a 20+ year intimate relationship as well as a child together is limited to determining whether their relationship was sufficiently close for it to be fiduciary in nature. The case hinged not on the fact that they were functionally married and t…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/17 08:47 PM
-20

See the long time subscribers here will have all seen loads of these stories posted in this sub where most of the women walk away from their actions scott free Any examples you can give?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/17 04:39 PM
1

You guys are fucking real naive if you think this guy actually didn't know about it.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 09:50 PM
0

Are you functionally retarded or what?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 01:01 PM
0

You are basically saying that every time someone rich wants to have sex, they should be prepared to give up half their fortune so that the potential kid doesn't choose them over the poorer parent. Uh yea. Having a kid is a big responsibility. Act like an adult. If you are having sex you should be prepared for the consequences and the responsibility of raising that child. Child support is not alimony though. Alimony is for long time marriages.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/17 12:28 PM
1

Child's wishes are important, but a child can "choose" the rich parent over the poor parent even if the poor parent has custody. They can resent the poor parent and wish they were with the rich parent instead.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 09:31 PM
1

Because a child's quality of life should not suffer or be degraded simply because their parents can't get along. You also don't want to encourage a child to always pick the wealthiest parent .
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/17 11:08 AM
1

Wow, I had no idea!
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/17 04:12 AM
1

Lol criminal penalties. Holleee shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 05:17 PM
1

Let's hear what sort of punishment is appropriate? You seem to be pretty reasonable and have a good grasp on reality. Let us hear your idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 05:11 PM
1

Good. Let's punish people based upon speculation. That's a good step also. Keep these great ideas coming.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 05:08 PM
1

Where am I justifying shitty behavior?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 05:08 PM
0

Punishment should be given when the defendant (or anyone involved in the case) can prove that the accuser is making the claim maliciously or for ulterior motives. That already exists. What's your point? For example in this situation, if this woman actually went to the police and accused this guy of raping her, and he produced this video showing that she was making it up just to get back at him because he pissed her off then she should be punished. Ok? And she didn't. Congrats. Guess we can end t…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 04:41 PM
0

So what is your solution? Punish any complainant who doesn't secure a criminal conviction?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 04:11 PM
0

When 90% of the time the burden of proof falls on the accused in rape cases? What fantasy land do you live in where the burden of proof lies on the criminal defendant? False accusations are a really big deal. True. They are. Having no legal repercussions for it doesn't really do anything to discourage it, and sadly it's become an issue in our society today. There are many legal repercussions already in place. Granted I think her passing comment isn't a big deal lol. It's actual false accusations…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:19 PM
2

Knowingly reporting a false accusation to authorities is a crime, so what she did was a criminal threat. I mean, you do realize that there is a huge gray area between idle talk and credible threats which are punishable by criminal penalties, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:18 PM
2

You don't think accusing someone of a crime should be punishable? Yes. Let's discourage people from reporting crimes to the police. Good idea.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:17 PM
2

Did she file a false police report?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:16 PM
0

This post pretty accurately represents the absurdity of this subreddit
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 01:16 PM
2

? It doesn't matter if it's a man or a woman that hit him. If you are a college football player you need to understand that you are not "normal". You will be treated with extra scrutiny when it comes to acts of physical violence. I played college football at an ACC school. We had meetings all the god damn time about how to act in public. Drinking. Fighting. Verbal altercations, etc. There are dudes that will try to spark your temper. They will get drunk and push you in the diner at 2:00 a.m. bec…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 09:56 PM
0

Nope. This is a story about the civil trial, not the rape case. The reporter isn't punished because the rape story was fake, she's punished because of her own individual actions that have nothing to do with her gender.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 11:55 PM
0

And then there's also the fact that if the reporter were not female, the article never would have been published without rolling stone doing their due diligence and checking the story. K.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 11:54 PM
-4

Gender is the criteria for pussy pass denied or not, so I'm not really sure what you're getting at. Of course you don't. It's because you're a fucking idiot. THE REPORTER DIDN'T USE HER GENDER IN ANY WAY SO YOU CAN CHANGE THE GENDER TO MALE AND IT DOESN'T CHANGE ANY PART OF THE STORY. How can it be a pussypass if gender is completely irrelevant to the story. The only reason it's relevant to you is because you want to hate on women. Looks like you really have no idea what actually happened with t…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 02:08 PM
-6

Change the gender of the reporter and ask yourself if a single thing about the story changes. The reporter didn't make a false rape accusation. Do you have anything between your ears?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 02:00 PM
0

A person reports a new story. It is a story about an alleged rape. The reporter is guilty of defamation because the reporter did not do proper due diligence. The reporter never attempted to use her sex as any sort of justification for why she didn't do her due diligence. The reporter never attempted to use her sex as any sort of attempt to escape reckoning or liability for what she did. The reporter could have been a man and it wouldn't have changed a single thing about the story. How is that pu…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 01:36 PM
-6

This article is about the journalist, not the rape victim. How did the journalist use her gender to try and escape her reckoning?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 01:33 PM
-25

This has nothing to do with trying to use a pussy pass. This sub proves time and time again it is just about hating women than anything else.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/16 04:14 AM
1

I don't know why you insist on framing the issue as a woman having to become a prostitute, it just shows how unreasonable you are and how unwilling you are to approach this issue from a point of view that isn't completely fucked. If I ignore your proposition for what line of work she would have to do, yes, you can (and it does happen) do the same thing with women. Tell them that because they chose to raise a child as their own, they are now obligated to continue to support that child.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 06:22 PM
1

I guess on this subreddit it doesn't, but in reality, where I live, it does. I am a practicing attorney. I have seen and worked on countless number of child support matters. Have you?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 06:12 PM
-1

Why not sacrifice the woman's right for the betterment of the kid? If a woman tried to walk away from a child and stop financially supporting it, yes, it would happen. Like forcing her to be a prostitute to keep up the lifestyle of the kid? So edgy. No? Why not? It's basically the same thing. Yes. Clearly, forcing women to be prostitutes is the same as asking for a share of the man's income which can be modified depending on their job and income.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:28 PM
-7

You are wasting your breath on a bunch of angsty teenagers. They will never understand that it's about maintaining the child's lifestyle and welfare when two adults decide to split up. The child has no choice in the matter and should not be punished. It's about the kid, not the adults, but all anyone on here can think about is the man. Why should someone who committed to being a child's father get to walk away from that commitment?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:55 AM
2

Can someone explain what this video has to do with this subreddit?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/16 07:16 PM
5

Who cares?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 09:28 PM
-4

Do you idiots live in a bubble or something?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 11:27 AM
-4

Except its not offensive and both genders get the same treatment. In fact, female athletes are treated like pieces of meat a lot more than male athletes.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 07:50 PM
5

This place has been almost exclusively a "watch this woman get shit on" sub for quite a while.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/16 04:17 PM
-7

which I think this sub is usually pretty against, also. lol
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/16 06:09 PM
-1

Yes. Brilliant. You've got it all figured out. Good luck in life.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:34 PM
-1

Keep moving the goal posts
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:05 PM
-1

Uhh because one is 14, a child, and not capable of consenting? How stupid are you?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:43 PM
0

So when a person reports a crime to the police, they shouldn't believe that person until there is enough evidence to prove the perpetrator guilty?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:32 PM
1

My favorite thing about this post is the fact that this subreddit likes to hammer on SJWs and the like whenever they "invent" something to be offended about. You guys literally just got offended over nothing. This doesn't even target men. It says nothing about men. There is nothing discriminatory about it. Yet here you are, upvoting it to the moon because you love your victim complex.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:03 PM
-1

I can't believe people believe shitposts like this: I tried to explain as calmly as I could how she was completely wrong. I didn't raise my voice above a calm tone, but she still flipped out and sent me to the principal's office. She sent a note along with me, saying that I had "disrupted class and argued with the teacher." So apparently conversing with a teacher can now be equated to arguing with one at my school.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:48 PM
-1

Maybe don't go around indiscriminately fucking random girls you know nothing about. I don't feel bad for someone who can't figure out that he's about to fuck someone that is 14 years old.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:51 PM
-3

That only happens when posts make it to the front page, out of the echo chamber. This subreddit is hilariously awful.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:36 PM
-5

The fact that anyone upvoted this comment is insane. How stupid are you people? Get some fucking perspective and enlarge your world view. Holy fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 03:18 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:00 PM
-5

Yes. Minor felony.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:00 AM
-5

Names of charges vary by state, but yes, a very minor felony or misdemeanor.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:40 AM
-11

Forcible touching. Assault, etc. Low class felony at most.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:25 AM
-13

And? How does that warrant an attempted murder charge?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:59 AM
-3

And why does that bother you? There are hundreds of double standards that we live with every day. Why does this one bother you?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:59 AM
-12

So that means she should be charged with attempted murder? So you realize how stupid this place sounds when it uses hyperbole like this?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:54 AM
-16

She attempted to kill him?
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:49 AM
-27

Lol attempted murder. You people crack me up.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:40 PM
-7

Serious question, why does this bother you?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 11:38 PM
1

Duress is still a valid defense.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:43 PM
-2

He did you dumb shit
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:40 PM
-5

Women are evil, grrrrr bad women!
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/15 06:08 PM
-8

Oh yea? Where's that? Would be great for you to point that part of the image out to me. I am probably just a moron that can't read or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/15 03:16 AM
-9

Let's assume everything you just said is true, even though it.s not. That's not using a pussy pass, that's just you hating women. Cool story.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/15 03:15 AM
-9

So how is that pussy pass denied? I'm confused, she didn't say it's ok for women to cheat but not men. She didn't use get sex to try to get out of something. She said something, someone pointed out that she is a hypocrite and then she said a stupid statement about hating men. Where in that is there the attempt to use a pussy pass?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/15 10:42 PM
-10

Huh? No it's not. You're inserting your bias to see what you want to see.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/15 10:40 PM
-19

Where's the attempt to use a pussy pass?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/15 06:14 PM
36

Not really a pussy pass. That defense is available to anyone, man or woman, and young accomplices often raise it when trying to soften their sentencing. In fact, that's the very defense the Boston Marathon Bomber's lawyers employed. The defense isn't raised because "you're a woman". It's raised because you are young, impressionable, stupid, and under the influence of someone more powerful and compelling than you.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/15 02:37 AM
2

But not a brain to make sense of what they see and hear.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 05:34 PM
-1

Cool. So any time a woman loses a lawsuit we should post it on here. The point of this subreddit is for when a woman UNFAIRLY attempts to use her gender to achieve something that her gender should have no affect on. A sexual/gender discrimination lawsuit is gender neutral. Period. This is moronic woman bashing for no reason. If those are your standards this place is a shithole that's no better than MRA or any other woman bashing subreddit.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/15 04:28 AM
-3

Sexual discrimination lawsuits are not gender specific? Everyone had a right to appeal? How is this gender specific?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 11:57 PM
-4

How does this fit in this subreddit?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 07:02 PM
0

http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/domestic_violence1/Charts/2014%20Joint%20Custody%20Chart.authcheckdam.pdf This is the ABA's summary of the subject. Until the mid-1800s, fathers were favored for custody in the event of a divorce because children were viewed as property, similar to the farm or family business when a couple divorced. Around 1850, most states switched to following the Tender Years Doctrine or a strong preference for the mother unless there was something ver…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:01 PM
-11

Sure. There isn't a single state in this country that has a presumption of the woman in a divorce retaining custody. In fact, although every state does not have presumption joint custody (many do and the trend is towards presumptive joint custody), the vast majority of the ones that don't have presumptive joint custody consider joint custody as the first and preferable option in every divorce unless there is a compelling reason otherwise. Therefore, the courts will almost always go first to join…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:35 PM
22

The funny part is that the entire image can be boiled down to things that men statistically CHOOSE to do to themselves and other men more than women, with perhaps the exception of combat deaths. Are men being oppressed by men? Sounds horrible. Someone better stand up for these men.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:23 PM
-38

Hi. I'm an attorney. You're wrong. Just because you want reality to be one way, doesn't mean it actually is.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 08:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter