TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LittleBigCheeks Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by LittleBigCheeks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

You're telling unattractive women or women in general that if they never got a single compliment, no dates, no flirting, no glances, etc. that they then should and would be grateful for, say, the creepy old man that follows them to their car after work because it's something? That's ridiculous. Some of that "bad" attention comes with actual danger and fear. Women are not entitled for criticizing some of the attention they get from creeps just because some men get little to no attention. Women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 06:17 PM
11

I was a teacher in IN and made 40k a year, about 2200 a month after taxes. I'm a waitress now and I make roughly 3k a month after taxes, granted working 6 days a week. Teachers might make some money in CA and big cities but across all the Midwest they start at 36-40k. Teachers are notoriously underpaid in this country. Edit - after taxes I was making about $17 an hour as a high school teacher and that doesn't count the vast amount of hours spent working outside of the school day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 04:35 AM
1

I think that's a great idea. But we don't have anything close to that in the US yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:43 PM
1

What if birth control fails (pill, condom or both being used) but she can't afford an abortion so a a much more expensive birth/child she can't afford is inevitable?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/19 02:57 AM
2

Alright, now we are getting somewhere. I'm not trying to use "double standard" as a buzzword, I'm using it profusely because I have seen you comment that they don't exist, or they don't exist in dating. So I'm attempting to define it, separately from dating preferences, and also express how it might come across in those dating preferences. I also definitely don't want to silence people; I'm arguing that some double standards do exist because I think it's important to discuss them, why they are f…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 11:30 PM
4

double standard 1: a set of principles that applies differently and usually more rigorously to one group of people or circumstances than to another I don't see what is so hard to grasp. A personal preference is different than an unfair expectation from an entire gender. It's as simple as the difference between personally being attracted to a man who acts a certain way and expecting/thinking all men should act that way. Both would affect dating. Saying, "I'd like to date a man who is confident, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 10:35 PM
2

No, I do not think a non-assertive woman should take a non-assertive man just so she is not a hypocrite. I'm getting your point more from the first 2 paragraphs and I mostly agree with you, but I still think preferences and standards (or a double standard) are different and the difference is important. Again, a double standard is a rule or principle unfairly applied across whole groups. A man wanting a woman with a low N is perfectly fine. I don't care about N count either, but it's a personal, …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 09:53 PM
2

Exactly... Preferences are totally different than double standards. I completely agreed that people have different preferences and date people with different qualities than themselves. That's totally fine and expected. Idk what you're trying to argue here, you're correct but it's completely besides the point. The examples you keep giving are not double standards and I thought that's what the conversation was about. A double standard is a rule or a principle applied unfairly to different groups. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 08:52 PM
9

I think this person was saying those analogies are a little ridiculous and that's not what s/he was talking about. I totally agree that people have different preferences and you shouldn't be looking to date your clone but I don't think all of your examples are considered double standards. A double standard is more about behavior and actions than preferences or fixed stats. Like "I do this for you, but you don't for me" hence the giving/receiving oral. A guy not sucking dick isn't a double standa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 08:29 PM
1

Again, whether or not women want to or often do yard work is one thing, but to say that a large number of women physically cannot mow a lawn is fucking ridiculous. I'm 110lb five foot woman and I can mow a lawn, install a sump pump, and work on a car. I have done all these things and they weren't all too difficult to learn. And if there's something on a car that a man can lift but I can't, I bet two or more women could. I'm not arguing biology. Men are typically stronger and capable of gaining m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/19 02:05 AM
1

Yes, working on a car is physically demanding, but some women do it, and not bodybuilding women, either. Yes, I agree it may be physically easier for men to work on a car, and knowing how to do something isn't the same as doing it. But women are physically capable of learning how to, and actually fixing a car, especially with the right equipment and experience. Some women already do it, so we know women can. Asking why most women don't want to do it is a better question, as I said. And yes, cook…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 07:50 PM
3

Men were typically taught those skills from a young age while women were discouraged from doing so. Men are exposed to it through other male role models and taught to help with those things by their fathers and encouraged to take up those trades. It may be a woman's fault if she doesn't choose to learn these tasks as an adult, but it isn't a child's fault if he/she wasn't taught, exposed to, or experienced certain skills. I've seen men just as horrible with the tasks you mentioned because they h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 07:44 PM
1

The issue isn't about "learning" to fix a car Yes it is, cause you posed the question. You didn't ask why women are more demanding or want more, you asked if they need men more. It doesn't matter if women often don't learn to fix the car, if they are capable of learning how to do it (no matter how difficult) then they don't need a man to do, they want a man to do it. All of these tasks you referred to, if men simply vanished off the planet, women could learn to do for themselves (even if it's be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 07:18 PM
5

I'm a young, unmarried woman living with my single mom and I take on the majority of that work. I mow the lawn and fix things around the house (installing a new doorknob, fixing the cabinet hinges, and installing a new sump pump, for example). I think you're using the wrong semantics here. Do I want to do those things? Not necessarily, but they need to be done. If I were married and my husband took on those jobs, I would carry weight in other areas, like cooking, cleaning, and working as well, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 07:03 PM
1

Interesting. I actually find a lot of TRP ideology interesting and helpful, like a lot of the self-improvement stuff. I get stuck on a lot of what appears to be sexism and generalizing what all women want or how they behave, but I'm trying to delve into it more. Maybe I will check that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 06:42 PM
1

Right, it's different for everyone. What I think defines a good set of morals might be different from your definition. We are in agreement there. This is one of many posts on this subreddit where the post and/or comments seem to universally suggest that the "bad" guy is more attractive to women than the "good" guy because good guys aren't exciting or sexual or dominant. And I'm saying (which seems to be in agreement with you) that that is not necessarily what a "good" man is because good is subj…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 06:35 PM
0

Depends on what the girls like I guess. Everyone is different, I'm not trying to speak for all women. I happen to think Trump breaks his own morals and principles often (going on things he's said in the past) and I have other criteria for mental atrraction as well. You could be the hottest guy ever but if something bigoted or stupid comes out of your mouth I'd be drier than the Sahara. Mental and physical attraction go hand in hand for me. I would say that intolerance and complete selfishness/la…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 05:44 PM
1

I wholeheartedly disagree with this and everytime this conversation comes up I am baffled. The problem is that being a good, agreeable man gets you nothing in 2019. Maybe it's because we have a totally different view of what "good" means. Yes, being a pathetic, agreeable pushover who always follows the rules is unattractive and probably will get you nothing, but why is this the universal definition of a "good" man on this sub? My bf is a firefighter/paramedic because he has such a need to help o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:06 PM
1

Maybe as a girl I can spot it more. I'm not saying that everyone woman isn't intentionally deceiving you, I'm sure some are. But even when I wear "natural" makeup, which I would consider tinted moisturizer and a little mascara, things like that, my bf knows (even when we first met, and I'm a redhead) that I have some freckles, I don't naturally have dark eyelashes, etc. because he's not stupid. And I don't mean that as an insult, I agree that some women may be intentionally trying to deceive or …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 09:00 AM
1

I agree it shouldn't be comdemned and is normal so we mostly agree. I think it's just an argument of semantics. Definition of lying to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive Definition of deceive to deliberately make someone believe something untrue These are from Oxford. I just think that lying/deceiving is trying to convince someone or make them believe something that is not true, which is the whole point of everyone knowing women's looks are enhanced by some things. She's not trying …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:28 AM
2

I'm not making up my own definitions. Top definitions in order from multiple different reputable dictionaries: Google (of a person) cause (someone) to believe something that is not true, typically in order to gain some personal advantage. Merriam-Webster to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid Cambridge Dictionary to persuade someone the something false is true Oxford deliberately cause (someone) to believe something that is not true, especially for personal gain. We can bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 08:29 PM
2

Women do know they look different with makeup up, as everyone who isn't a moron should They put on makeup to look better That's from my comment. I think we're saying the same thing here so I don't get your point. Yes it's an enhanced, false impression. I'm just saying it's not intentional deception because everyone knows makeup gives a false impression, they aren't trying to present it as a true impression. Most people try to enhance their appearance and that's okay as long as they aren't saying…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 07:54 PM
3

That was my point in my comment. Women do know they look different with makeup up, as everyone who isn't a moron should, thus it's not women intentionally/deceiving lying to you. They assume that you know that's not exactly what they look like. They aren't trying to fool you into thinking it is. They put on makeup to look better while at the same time understanding other people know they're wearing makeup. I'm not trying to moralize it either way and that was my point, I think I misunderstood yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 07:45 PM
5

This is like saying that anything that enhances appearance is a lie. So women should wear flat cloth bras, clothes that show their exact figure, wear absolutely no makeup and never blow dry/put product in their hair? "Even if you know" that those things are enhancing their appearance? I also know a lot of men who, if they had girlfriends like that, would complain that they put no effort in for them. A lie is intentionally deceiving someone. I've never heard of any woman wearing makeup and genuin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 07:34 PM
4

I don't understand how it's a false impression though. How does everyone not simply know that women look different without makeup? It's a really obvious thing to grasp. Women don't think they're fooling you. She's not putting on makeup to give a false impression, she's assuming you're not stupid and realize that she will look different when she takes it off. Also, I know many men who would complain if their SOs stopped wearing makeup/doing their hair all together that they're no longer putting i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 07:19 PM
13

I think, for me at least, it depends on the effort being put in. If my SO was unemployed or laid off I would support him if he was actually looking for work/applying or we had some agreement worked out. In my last LTR my bf lost his job AND dropped out of school not just without telling me, but lying also. I thought he was in school for a full semester but he was sitting at home. He also said he was looking for work and I believed him for a while, but I caught him sleeping through interviews and…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 06:54 PM
0

Most women have to be attracted to someone physically and mentally to want to actually fuck them. It goes hand in hand for a lot of women as opposed to men. There are a lot of men out there I can say are "good-looking" but am not sexually attracted to because there's something lacking mentally. I can be attracted to a man, but if he reveals himself to be a racist, unnecessarily cruel or unempathitic, or violent without good reason, that indicates to me stupidity, narrow-mindedness, intolerance, …
/r/TheRedPill22/09/19 06:17 PM
0

So you don't want to date any woman who has had any semblance of a relationship before you or she's settling? How realistic is that? What if she just hasn't met you yet? Yes, it's a possibility she is settling, so don't date that specific woman. But there are soo many reasons why a woman may have dated someone and the relationship didn't work out. What if she had one or two boyfriends before you and broke up with them because they ended up being not the right fit? And now she has more knowledge …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 05:41 PM
2

How can you very seriously say if a woman has had any relationship or sex before you she must be settling. What if she just hasn't met you yet? She could have ended her past relationships. It seems every guy on here wants a virgin (a slutty one at that) who has never had feelings fir anyone until she laid eyes on the guy. It's just not realistic. There are so many reasons why her previous relationships may have ended and why you are better for her. Sure, it's a possibility she was dumped by ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 05:36 PM
1

Fair enough! I totally agree, everyone has preferences and sexual history is included in that. Someone's sexual history may make them less valuable as a dating partner to you but I just felt that it was being implied it makes them less valuable in general. And there is a lot of hypocrisy going around, I feel, and I don't necessarily agree there is a difference that makes it perfectly fine for men to sleep with a lot of people and not vice versa. But you acknolwedge some hypocrisy and also plan o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 05:12 PM
2

I value sex as intimate as well. It's fine to have a preference to not want a girl who has slept around a lot, but to find the perfect virgin girl will be difficult. Also, are you waiting until marraige to have sex? Because not every relationship works out. Maybe there is a girl out there perfect for you who also values respect and intimacy, and has only had intimate, meaningful sex in the context of an LTR but it didn't work out in the long run. To have a preference and not want a woman who wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 12:19 AM
1

That's correlation, not causation and there could be a variety of other factors as well. It also depends on how high the actual count is. Having some moderate amount of sexual experience, as I said in my previous comment, can be beneficial sexually to both parties. That doesn't mean 50+. Having a few partners beforehand helps you learn about yourself sexually but after a certain number there is really no additional benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 09:21 PM
1

Are you seriously saying that women don't grow and mature, or people in general for that matter, that everything about a woman including her sexual preferences and approach will be exactly the same at 19 as it is at 27? That's ridiculous. Sure don't, stay with a women who isn't having any sex with you if that's not what you're about. Totally fine. But it's perfectly reasonable that people may want to engage in casual sex at one point in their lives and not at a later point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 09:17 PM
2

Right, because she has absolutely nothing to compare you to, no healthy sexual exploration to find out what she likes/doesn't like to communicate to you, no experience to know if you're sexually compatible. That's the kind of woman you want because she's the easiest to please and you can boost your ego that you're "the best she's ever had." There's also a difference between "she's enjoyed some moderate amount of casual sex like most human beings" and "every man has fucked her." Some sexual exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 09:13 PM
1

How about humans just explore themselves sexually to learn what they like/don't like and take that experience and communication into future relationships to be better partners? "Having more to compare to" doesn't mean she is likely to leave you, it means she isn't settling for you because she knows what she likes and how to tell if you will be sexually compatible long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 08:44 PM
1

I agree with the first paragraph totally. I don't agree with playing a "waiting game" but it's not always a game. Like, should the relationship and sex not just progress or happen naturally if you're attracted to each other? At the same time, a 27 yr-old woman shouldn't say to herself, "Well, I have to have sex on the second date cause that's just the rule, it would be too long if I didn't" or "I had sex with someone on a second date when I was 20 so that's my time-limit, I like this guy and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 07:02 PM
1

Most of that makes sense. It seems, though, that's it's just a difference in perspective so I don't see how one side can be wrong or not. If a man is thinking, "She slept with me on the third date and not the second like the last guy, she has made me work harder and respects me less," and the woman is thinking, "I really like and am attracted to this guy and I want a chance at a relationship, so I don't immediately want to have sex," then in her eyes she's not trying to disrespect him, she respe…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 06:29 PM
0

I don't see how putting out early is her "A-game"? And I don't understand, isn't a big part of the redpill self improvement? Do you not believe women change and mature over time? I understand a large n-count can be a dealbreaker, that's really just personal preference. My count is not high but I had some casual sex in high school and early college, partied a little bit. I don't see why history is so damn important if it's not repeating itself. Women can self improve as well, mentally and physica…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 05:41 PM
5

What is considered a high count?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/19 05:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter