TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LittlePurplePenguin Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by LittlePurplePenguin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

There have also been lawmakers that regularly voted against gay rights, who were then later discovered to be gay themselves. There seems to be little connection between who a politician really is and how he votes when money and power are at stake.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:01 PM
4

This here is the truth. The discussion should be centered around preventing a false conviction in the future and requiring sufficient evidence to even bring charges against a person. If someone is 11 at the time, it's difficult to hold them criminally culpable (despite recent stories of a 6 year old boy being charged as a sex offender)
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:04 AM
2

Reading this comment on the article makes me sad (This is NOT my comment): grandpaskorn 18 Fans sad to say but most likely her recanting her story is the lie-- like many child abuse victims they are made to feel guilty for "tearing apart the family" --- its like the abuser becomes the victim and plays the victim-- many young girls are made to feel like they are the ones who destroyed the family and if they just "hide" their story or take back what they said then things will be better...
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:58 AM
1

It's also pretty difficult to counter an argument of anecdote (e.g. she witnessed girls having their skirts forcibly lifted), that realistically speaking has no data backing it, with anything but further anecdote. You can certainly dismiss it as having no data supporting the notion, but unfortunately, many incorrectly view that as conceding the point or simply pedantic.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:48 AM
9

This is because men are looked at for their utility before anything else. We always have been. It's why all of our clothes look the same, more or less. It's why a 'man in uniform' is stereotypically attractive, as it's the purest form of utilitarian. That said, men are judged much more harshly on displays of wealth, or lack thereof. There's certainly a different experience when dealing with women when I'm driving a $15k car vs a $115k car.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:16 PM
3

I'm sure there are others far more versed than I, but my understanding, aside from things like the "Violence against women act", is that most are written rather broadly and tend to refer to "on the basis of gender" rather than naming women specifically. That said, the practical application and interpretation of many of these laws aren't exactly in line with that. Additionally, while the 'tender years doctrine' was replaced by 'best interests of the child', the end result has remained largely the…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:02 AM
1

Just for the sake of argument, here is how it works: I charge you $X dollar amount + a $100 fee After you leave, I refund that $100 fee to my own card and cite it is an accidental overcharge. Because the operator of the application is typically blind to credit card information, again, due to PCI, it's difficult to detect. Can you detect it? Sure, but it would probably be more cost effective to eat some theft than hire someone to try to reconcile and track all the transactional records. If there'…
/r/MensRights12/07/14 01:46 AM
1

Accidental over payments / incorrect assessment of fees I would imagine. Mistakes happen and you would need some sort of method to put money back on a card.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:29 PM
2

Eh, I'm not sure theft is really relevant in this regard. I do a lot of data mining in my work and create algorithms to detect fraud and theft. Employee Theft via credit card is probably 10 fold higher than that of cash (typically bogus refunds). It's harder to spot for your average person than cash, and considering PCI restrictions, makes it a pretty easy thing for thieves. If I were a betting man, it probably comes down to not wanting to pay processing fees or worry about compliance.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:59 PM
2

Not sure I agree with this. In the world I work in and area I live, landscapers are lucky to pull $10-$13 an hour while secretaries (aka Executive Assistants these days) cap out around 90k / year but probably average 55-60k. (Salary.com places them at 59k and some change) The closest I could find was 'groundskeeper', which puts the salary 32k on average with a cap of 43k. I'm not making any claims about what's harder or deserves a greater salary, but secretaries make far more than your average l…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 05:22 AM
1

I don't think replacement doses of testosterone would be considered an experimental drug in a small phase clinical trial. It has been in use for the better part of 80 years or so now? Some may argue that the side effects are too severe to be considered a viable contraceptive, however, I do not think the literature shows them to be more severe than that of female birth control. What you are referring to are much more exotic contraceptive methodologies.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:36 PM
1

I've been 'street harassed', but never in a negative manner, at least how I would understand it. Let's call it 'benevolent harassment', to borrow a term. When either a man or a woman hits on me, I take it as a compliment and move on. I see women upset about catcalls the same I do when some men are upset when a gay man does the same to them--rather ignorant and homophobic.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:44 PM
-1

There are hormonal contraceptive methods for men, but quite a bit more difficult to come by. Female birth control is handed out like chewing gum by comparison.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:56 AM
2

I mean this in the nicest way possible, but I think you may be using false rape accusations and feminism as a crutch/rationalization for something else. Sure, false rape accusations are a problem, but it shouldn't stop you from living life. Edit: nevermind...I missed the "I can't say..." and read that as you worry too much about feminism.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 03:19 PM
1

I'm similar sized and agree complete. There are certain areas I will not live in or walk in. There are ATMs I would never go to and I avoid all ATMs after dark. Hell, I even check the good ones and every gas pump for skimmers. I don't go to a bar alone, let alone leave my drink there, or get sloppy drunk. I've even been guilty of doing the key thing at one point or another. It's simply common sense, not a gendered issue. I could be a 8' giant and it wouldn't matter. A bullet doesn't care how big…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:32 AM
1

I see this as two questions, so in terms of no longer marginalizing male victims, my personal opinion, and a bit of conjecture, is that we would need to undo a significant portion of the last 30 years of feminism. When women are sexually prolific or dominating, particularly when it is an older woman and a younger man, she is seen as empowered. In the reverse scenario, a man is viewed as a 'creeper' / 'pedo' / whatever. There is also the agency problem I mentioned above. To be fair, in situations…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:25 AM
1

It comes down to agency. Even in situations of statutory rape, the 14 year old boy is seen as one that is, at least on a partial level, more responsible for his actions by nature of being male. This is further evidenced by the punishments dolled out to female perpetrators or in instances where that same boy is forced to pay child support. Because that boy is seen as responsible for his actions, he is consequently incapable of being seen as a victim. As such, without the status of "victim", it th…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter