TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LittleRedHeadedLady Archive

View 0 posts and 345 comments by LittleRedHeadedLady on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

lol Yea, not quite so. That little picture starts in 1995... guess what? I've been playing since the late 1970s when my dad would bring out his Pong. So, suck it up! Girls like me have been playing video games since probably before you were born.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:02 AM
1

No, all 3 of the fools did. That woman shouldn't have parked like she did, but the dude shouldn't have gone all Vigilante and try to force her to follow the rules. He caused all the backup. She didn't have the right to park crazy and he didn't have the right to demand she park straight. The line of cars behind him shouldn't have to pay for these three people's issues. Move on, find another spot, and call the garage security. I really hope they can ticket idiots who park like crazy. The rest of u…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:47 PM
2

You'd have to have balls to do all that.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 04:41 PM
2

Yeah, but also plenty of guys to kill 'em for me. :)
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:23 AM
2

Hopefully we will get there. I tend to stick to issues more of what the government/police will do and leave some of it to each person. Like I like being a woman, I like being girly. I want to scream at a spider and have somebody else kill it. I like what makes me a woman... but I want the same legal rights as anybody else. So, I want to scream like a scared little girl at a spider but still be able to join the Navy. lol
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:07 AM
1

Oh, no women can and do hit men too. Little doubt there. But society has never suggested that a wife hitting her husband is okay... they just didn't believe it actually happened, ya know? Or they don't believe it could cause the man any damage or hurt him. So a slightly different dynamic there.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:59 AM
1

Not really. It only appears different to us, because we believe adult women are completely capable of being rational free agents. The societal view that created the situation that allowed "disciplining" your wife was based on the view that she wasn't capable of free agency and therefore the responsible person (husband) became the person who needed to be able to manage her behaviour. Before she was married that person would be her father. The connection is obvious. That may have been why society …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:53 AM
1

As a woman, do you honestly believe I don't understand blanket statements? I was speaking generally about something that used to be more common place. It's not the same thing as black people blaming white people for something a hundred years ago. I was alive when police still wouldn't arrest men for beating their wives/girlfriends/sisters... those men are still alive who did beat women, those men are still alive who didn't arrest men who did beat women. This is a fresh issue still... it's not li…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:14 AM
1

Without said original documents in hand I reckon the semantics of "was it ever legal in America to beat your wife" is an argument nobody will actually win online. I think that the problem was too many husbands got away with beating their wives and the wives had no escape. Did that mean every wife was beaten? Nope. Did that mean the only spouses ever hit were wives? Nope. Did that mean men were always arrested for beating women? Nope. Did police sometimes intervene? Yep. Did police always arrest …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:09 AM
1

It was a general statement. I didn't mean ALL men used to hit ALL women. Just in general it was once acceptable (on various levels in various places) for men to beat women.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:15 AM
-2

And I'm sure there's a million feminist websites that will cite the states and state laws where it was once legal. C'mon... it has been legal at various times across the world (and still is in some places) and there was obviously a need to make it illegal. If the MBC prohibited it in 1655 it was because it was happening, no? Here's a website with laws that make various beatings of wives legal in various cities/states. http://www.harford.edu/faculty/dvolkart/handouts/odd_state_laws.htm Alabama In…
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:09 AM
0

lol Well, I went through the tear gas chamber in Navy basic training, so I'd rather be pepper sprayed than punched! You also don't have to directly pepper spray someone's face or eyes.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:59 PM
-2

Yes indeed it has been legal in various states at various times (not to mention some in some countries right now) for husbands to beat their wives or fathers their daughters. It hasn't always been illegal. It has at times been socially acceptable. It should never be legal and we should never go back to letting men hit women. It goes without saying... women shouldn't hit men either. If the sexes were reversed, no she shouldn't have hit him... going off the idea that he was drugged up. It wouldn't…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:04 PM
-8

I disagree that violence is ever a reasonable response in public. That guy wanted to beat her ass. She was obviously on drugs. She wouldn't have felt her beating and then all hell would have broken loose putting the other people into danger. Yes, he's the victim and I don't know why security didn't just pull her off of him. That doesn't mean he should have hit her. We don't need give to give men excuses and reasons to hit women again. No doubt, she should have been arrested. That's where the inj…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:34 PM
-1

You should have just moved on and gotten another parking spot. You all caused much inconvenience to others. I'd be pissed as hell at all of you if I were in that line. However, there should be parking attendants to hand out stiff penalties to people who double park like that. I'm not saying she should have gotten away with it at all! I'm saying it's not your responsibility to make her (or anyone) follow the rules. If I was in her situation, I'd tell you off and since I could afford a BMW I would…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:50 PM
10

Because she obviously wasn't going to listen to reason.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:31 PM
-2

Exactly! Violence doesn't have to be the answer, nor the response. Part of why this went on so long is the guy's reactions. She was obviously on something.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:29 PM
0

She was rushing to get into a line... be nice and let her go. I'm not suggesting letting her go after she was rude about it. The end result of this situation was that she still thought she was right and she had that reenforced by others around her. If he had just let her go ahead of him, by him slowing down or pausing or whatever (that's what I do because those rushing like maniacs in line tend to cause issues in line for some reason), she would have rushed into line. Now, she feels like she was…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:20 AM
0

So, it happened for a bit of time in France and England a couple hundred years ago. It happened because men were supposed to be in charge of their wives and if any beating was going on it was supposed to be the men beating their wives. Holy cow, they are advocating beating your wives and humiliate some men who didn't beat their wives, WTF?? And yeah, the end result is MRAs crying foul???? You shouldn't be paraded in public if you are a victim of domestic violence. Luckily, this apparently hasn't…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:37 AM
0

Being nice to others doesn't kill me, even if they haven't earned or deserved it.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:15 AM
0

He should have let her go in front of him... that doesn't make her a nice person. She's obviously rude because it was rude of her to call him out on it. That means she feels entitled to it, which is wrong and rude. If I find myself (hopelessly) in Walmart and I'm heading to a line and see a person rushing ahead of me, to get into line, I let them go first. Because it is the polite and proper thing to do. I imagine these people are either in a hurry for a good reason or their hurrying will take c…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:13 AM
1

And if the husband went into debt he could use his wife's money without permission to pay his debts. I've never heard a man could go to jail for his wife's crimes before, marriage debt has always been communal and a debt between both people. Really? "They" who is the they that paraded a man around town if his wife abused him, like it happened once in one town? Or it was a wide spread practice. It was legal law in the United States? In the whole history of humanity, I'm sure we can find all kinds…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:06 AM
-7

The proper and human thing to do would be to let her go ahead of you. That's what any human should have done. I would guess the man called you out on it because the way you went about it looked really bad. I mean you're getting in line for crap you can buy at Walmart, you aren't buying a new lung or something. That's not to say the woman was deserving of nice treatment since she obviously felt like others owed her something. She would be rude without a doubt, you don't demand such things from ot…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:31 AM
1

That's not what I was posing. I was saying what if there was a loud cry from women who opposed making infant circumcision illegal... not that women can't be opposed to circumcision or that there wouldn't be a religious outcry, but simply some loud women deciding that is must be okay to circumcise little babies.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:17 AM
3

Let's be logical about this. If outlawing male infant circumcision came up to vote and a large vocal group of women were demanding the rights to decide what happens to their children's body, there would not be one second that men would pause and think... well, now wait a minute, it sure is easy to be for legalized genital mutilation when you don't have a penis??? Of course there would be.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:41 AM
2

Do you know how hard it would be to actually do that and get pregnant? At any rate, it is impossible to prove how she got pregnant unless she confessed. However, of course if there was a way to prove something like this I do think it shows the woman is not mentally capable of raising a child and she should lose immediate custody and then the father can choose to opt out or not at birth.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:38 AM
3

Is there a /r/somepeoplearejustassholes?? That's where this would fit. lol
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:56 AM
5

For reals? I've been called slut, whore, skank, and worse for rejecting complete strangers. When people reject people, some people often go postal and make all kinds of false accusations... true story.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:32 AM
1

That really sucks. Good luck!!
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:02 PM
1

Is any person entitled to half a billion dollars? I wouldn't say so. But if you marry someone and they make a billion dollars in the time you are married to them, then you are entitled to half a billion dollars. It's not my money, it's not your money, it was Mr. and Mrs. Woods' money. They split it.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:02 PM
1

Support two households, doubtful... aid another household in getting established, yes. In California it is alimony for half the time of the marriage up to 10 years, seems fairish... in this economy, let's be honest I can't tell you what would be fair here. BUT, after 10 years of marriage alimony is paid for the rest of the person's life or until the one receiving alimony remarries... then we get into the fact that that isn't fair at a certain point (except accounting for business issues, etc.) R…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:27 AM
2

Is she bringing these new guys around your daughter? Sounds scary, but if I were you I'd get a new lawyer. It's not his job to tell you what you want, but his job to get you what you want. Good luck.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:41 AM
1

I disagree. The choice for one parent to stay at home is one both the husband and wife decide upon. It is often in the best interest of the children to do so. Once a parent sacrifices a career to stay at home, they take themselves out of the work force, out of the training, out of the promotions, etc... You cannot expect that person to then jump right into caring for themselves and their children immediately, they need the time to adjust. Most women are not going to live the "life she is accusto…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:23 AM
0

lol I don't care if you do or not.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:04 AM
1

Husbands and wives are both still responsible for the debts of the marriage.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:57 AM
1

The 80s... it was a good time to beat your wife and not go to jail. No, she didn't hit him first. Mental illness has nothing to do with what I saw.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:56 AM
1

Alimony is still necessary at the times it is given. Alimony does not have to be asked for or approved in my state. It is not a given, nor is it a guarantee to either party. $12,000 in child support is beyond the point because that would be what the children need. Yes, it does matter what each person put into the marriage. A divorce cause major disruptions to people's lives and economic status, despite women getting most of the alimony, it is still women's whose "manner of living" she's used to …
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:22 AM
1

No, I'm saying when you have no legal rights to money, your property or your children you were less likely to be physically abusive. (However, I would say you would be more likely to want to kill the husband, since then you may then have rights to property or money... hence a few women were serial husband killers in the United States).
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:06 AM
1

The U.S.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:04 AM
1

Fathers have kidnapped and/or killed their children to keep them away from the mother... nobody is immune to this concept. If a custodial parent is doing crack... request a drug test. The problem with maintaining child support is that plenty of fathers have gotten paid under the table to avoid child support... thank the men before you for that one. Whether the father loses his job or not, the child still needs to be taken care of. Who cares if a woman gets divorced just because it is Thursday, y…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:00 AM
0

I'm sure it is becoming more commonplace and more into the public eye that women today can and do abuse men. Women have always been beaten more than men, that's all across history... that doesn't mean no wife has ever beaten her husband. No, I don't think women have been as domestically violent as men, but that has more to do with the lack of rights women have than women can't be as violent.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:52 AM
0

Of course there is no law that says it is okay to beat anyone. There's never a law that allows you to do something. It was not always illegal to beat your wife under the whole concept that wives and children were property of the husband/father. Assault is illegal right now but I can spank my children legally. It's a part of that concept. And several states early in American history had laws that outlawed wife beating, why do you think that was? It's because it was happening. Was every single man…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:50 AM
1

Well, since many of us women have seen other women in our lives go through real abuse, I simply disagree. It's not a sense that every man abuses, just the sense that for a very long time men who did abuse their wife and children got away with it. And that is the truth. I did not grow up believe every man abuses his wife because I have a hell of a lot of uncles who did not abuse anyone. But the ones who did abuse, often got away with it. Heck, I remember the police refusing to arrest my aunt afte…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 06:47 AM
1

Yes, a father can do ridiculous things to keep children to himself. I don't know why this woman hasn't been charged with a crime, that is just as ridiculous. Sorry, but child support is for the child, the custodial parent is not held hostage to prove how the money is spent... that's a rule because fathers were withholding child support for all kinds of stupid reasons in the past. Any person should be able to divorce for whatever reason they want, that's not a freaking gender issue. It should not…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 06:42 AM
0

I don't think they are connected at all. The issue is more related to Animal Farm, than chivalry. Is this some episode of "The View"...?? One of those talk shows? I think that stems from a long line of females being abused by men ( a lot of us have that in our families, but don't have women abusing men) and going too far in the wrong direction. Or was it Sharon Osbourne? I don't think I've seen the clip, yet heard about it.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:36 AM
0

lol Well, I reckon I wouldn't have any real idea if chivalry or courtly love was ever really practiced in the Middle Ages. I wonder where the concept of holding a door open for a lady came about???
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:06 AM
0

Actually, I believe it is possible for some people to give consent to sex while drunk and mean it. Those people typically don't wake up the next morning feeling violated. They typically don't go file rape charges. This would not be rape... because neither party feels raped or violated. If two people go to a bar, get drunk, meet each other, and then go have sex and both wake up fine and dandy with it, then it is not rape. This is why feelings are a part of whether it is rape or not. If you have s…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:45 AM
0

No, some people consider the notion that a woman can rape a man. In that scenario I just put forth, I would be the rapist. I don't think it can only happen to women. If a man wakes up after having drunk sex, maybe he was actually raped. The difference is that men are taught that having sex is fine and dandy and expected. Women are taught to guard ourselves and save ourselves, so it is no surprise that women in that situation may go report the incident as a rape. Tough noogies, if you like drunke…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:11 AM
1

No, not true... legally speaking in my state you cannot give consent for sex while drunk, even if your drunk ass asks for it. Drinking in a bar is perfectly legal, you may even get drunk. You may get so drunk in that bar that the owner has to call a cab for you, that doesn't give anyone a right to have sex with you. Nobody has a right to another person's body just because someone is too drunk. You cannot give consent when you are drunk... that's the point of these laws. It doesn't matter if you …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:48 AM
1

No, I think more men kill their wives than women kill their husbands. I think that's just a matter of strength and ability though. I don't think women in general are incapable of killing their spouses, hell a lot of female serial killers kill multiple husbands. My point is that divorce court has become a lot more fair as divorce isn't legally based on gender... some states have set laws that make it gender neutral. I don't know, I don't think we need to believe anyone making accusations of abuse…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:42 AM
1

Well, since I have no need to rely on drunk men for sex, I reckon so!
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:24 AM
1

I have looked at DV stats before, just not at ones that were from Feminist sites. I always try to get information that is not from a source that might be biased. When a site/source is only about women in DV situations, I would consider that biased, so I try to look at ones which include men as victims too.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:24 AM
1

Thanks, nice to meet you too. Have a great night.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:22 AM
1

lol Actually, I'm pretty sure my life experiences aren't the same, but you go on with that!
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:11 AM
1

Yeah, actually not too many on here.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:10 AM
1

Ah, I see.. but where I am having sex with a drunk person is a crime (or rather can be a crime if one decides they were raped), so here you still can't have sex with a drunk person even if they ask.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:09 AM
1

Ah, luckily I don't know many people who have been murdered. I know several women who would have died from injuries inflicted upon them by men if we lived 200 years ago without modern medicine. I believe in being fair at all times. There are so many issues in divorce that's it's actually crazy. I don't think divorce favors women, I think some aspects favor the one who stays at home with kids, some aspects favor the one who makes less money, and then some aspects favor the one who makes the most …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:02 AM
1

I cannot imagine the job cops do. Kudos to cops. Even though I was in the Navy, there's no way I could be a cop!
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:45 AM
1

What if you didn't ask for it? What if you woke up and it had been done to you? It is illegal in my state to have sex with a drunk person even if they ask for it. If a drunk person asked you to kill them, you'd still be guilty of murder.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:36 AM
1

Don't you have women officers? I mean that might make sense to have the female take her in, given the situation.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:28 AM
1

Actually, I don't know what the feminist movement says about DV. I know what I've seen with my own eyes. I don't believe women kill their husbands as often as men kill their wives. I'm not sure the exact numbers matter because neither should be killing the other. I think people in divorce cases use whatever they can to get an advantage where they want one. I don't think courts overwhelmingly believe women, though I think some of this has to do with issue of money. All too often, the one with the…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:25 AM
1

I put a question mark, not a period.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:10 AM
1

Oh, just because I feel like saying they accused a cop of rape, gives them some legitimacy. They "accused" a cop, in the sense of they were just all out lying.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:09 AM
1

I would guess that cops get "accused" of rape a lot more these days. Good thing you've got cameras and such.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:58 PM
1

I agree. But in divorce court and child custody issues, both genders are telling lies and playing games. Certainly, there can be a case for the courts to be reminded to delve out custody more fairly, and as far as I've seen in California they are doing that mostly.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:56 PM
1

Well, I didn't make a statement that he was okay with dead children.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:51 PM
1

No person is responsible for their own rape. That's silly. Another person doesn't have the right to one person's body just because they were drunk. You are not guilty of something simply by being drunk, it is not illegal to be drunk in a bar. It is illegal in many states to have sex with a drunk person. Perhaps the silly thing is to go to a bar in order to have sex with a drunk person?? So, if you are really drunk at a bar and wake up the next morning with a sore butthole in some stranger's bed,…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:43 PM
2

Women used to make accusations that weren't believed, their children died. That's not a joke. It's part of why accusations started to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:39 PM
1

There have been and always will be women who lie about being raped. Most women who go to the trouble of actually filing rape charges probably were raped. I do know someone who screamed "rape" to get herself out of trouble, but she didn't file rape charges and then admitted there were no rapes (she claimed multiple accounts at first) when she was arrested for stealing credit cards of guys she slept with. However, she didn't file official rape charges and only screamed "rape" when the police were …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:37 PM
0

But eventually, they found her out, no? I mean what what else do you suggest? The man ended up getting full custody. The only problem with this story is that it took the police too long to figure it out and that the woman didn't go to jail and should not have unsupervised visits. I mean she made the story look good at first. People get arrested like that all the time, though I reckon there is a case for more evidence before someone is put into jail for a few months like that. The same thing coul…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:28 PM
1

I have no problem with fathers getting more rights to their children. I have an issue with acting like women making accusations and the courts investigating it is a case of the courts being anti-male. That's not the case at all, all accusations have to be investigated. Let's face it, some fathers didn't get joint custody because they didn't take hands-on care of their kids or they were/have pawned off the care of their kids to the new girlfriend. Judges should and do take that into consideration…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:14 PM
1

No problem, the whole issue is a sticky one. Like I've said, I know a guy who felt he was raped but he didn't even consider pressing charges and his reasons are the same reasons some women don't end up pressing charges.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:10 PM
1

Actually, I stated that accusations should be taken seriously. I used the example of men harming women and children because that's why the courts finally started listening. I actually have no issue with saying that courts need to take the accusations seriously because both mothers and fathers kill their children. (I think the stats are that women kill their babies far more than men, but after toddler hood men kill their children far more than women.) There is no doubt that accusations against mo…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:08 PM
1

Yeah, actually some court systems don't take rape claims as seriously because false rape claims can be made. That's life. In a child custody battle, if accusations are made the court needs to listen, whether they are made against the father or the mother.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:04 PM
1

Yeah, you're right they beat them till they were almost dead. Please, the exact numbers don't matter... women and children have died because the accusations against the men weren't believed. Hell, the same thing can be said against mothers who kill their children too. Accusations have to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:02 PM
0

Are you kidding me... do you not understand how many women are raped? It is far too many. Yes, feeling raped is the same damn thing as being raped. If you were too drunk to give consent, that is rape. If you were too drunk to give consent, wake up and don't care because you don't feel violated or raped, then that is not rape. Oh, hell fucking yes, women will not go to the police after a rape for a fucking bazillion reasons. Why? Because if you get stabbed multiple times, not one single person sa…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:59 PM
0

Feminism isn't about saying men cannot be fathers. Feminism isn't about being anti-male.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:52 PM
0

I don't know how/why anyone thinks it is bowing to the whims of women, though I do think some people misinterpret it as that. And that'd be their own faults... some men are fools and some women are brats... what can you do? What does that have to do with the guys who practice chivalry along with self-respect and the women who appreciate chivalry but don't want to run all over another person?
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:51 PM
1

Cuz I can. I have two sons, don't think I don't examine all the issues both my boys and my girl may face.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:49 PM
1

Yeah, I ain't stupid, I recognize that. Duh.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:49 PM
0

Hell, yeah you can feel "raped". If I go to a bar, get drunk off my ass and wake up next to some guy and in my head I feel okay with it, that very definition makes it not rape to me. If I wake up and feel violated, then it is going to be rape. Rape is a crime where one has to press charges against another, and if I don't feel raped, it is not rape to me (maybe I left my house just wanting to have sex and not caring who). If I wake up and feel violated, maybe I left my house just wanting to go se…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:48 PM
0

Thank you. The thing is just because a girl is drunk and making advances doesn't mean she's thinking clearly enough to be hitting on some random dude in a bar, doesn't mean she'll remember doing so the next morning. Men don't have some right to sleep with any girl, so it's not like something is being taken away from men if we all say... sleeping with a drunk person is a bad idea. Guess what, women do the same thing... prey on drunk guys. It's not just men who do it. Do we really want anybody doi…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 10:44 PM
-6

The conviction rate for date rape is actually very low. In many states, a drunk person cannot give consent, so it is rape. The gray area that needs to be discussed is when both parties are drunk. However, we cannot allow the issue to go unheard... some people target drunk people for easy sex... some people do it... some of them are men, some of them are women. This type of situation is always wrong. Now, if you file false rape charges I think you should be charged. But there is a difference betw…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:32 AM
-7

I stick to real life stories that I know about because the internet is full of liars. Yeah, I know of fathers who were ecstatic to get custody without child support... they should pursue the child support though. I also know women who were ecstatic to get custody without child support, because fathers have gained a lot of ground in the legal system, but they haven't always stepped up to actual parenting. As much as a woman can use her children as a weapon against the father, so can and do father…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:26 AM
-8

No, because some of this crap is total bullshit. There are real issues that boys and men face and this stuff is just the woman hating crap. Yes, some women falsely accuse men of stuff in divorce. Those issues are worked out... though it's always going to be "he said/she said". These aren't gender issues because the same thing can and is done against women. It's all about who is more vindictive. The reason why courts take action against an accusation is because they often don't have evidence and …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:17 AM
-4

In most jurisdictions, most judges aren't idiots and know false claims are made all the time. Hell, I know someone who made a true claim against the father and the judge called her out on her "bullshit" and then had to stick her own foot in her mouth when the proof came out that the father had some real issues. I also know of two times where the woman made false charges and lost custody of the child to the father because of the false charges. Divorce happens because of many reasons including spo…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:07 AM
-6

No, I don't think it is fairly standard practice for either person to file domestic abuse charges in a divorce. Either party can be ordered out of the house, if the request is made for practically any reason.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:01 AM
-6

Why would she file rape charges if she simply regretted the sex? Of course I don't know her, but maybe she was really confused, as most people are after a rape... you aren't confused after you have consented to sex. **Actually, I know people, plenty of people, who had "regretted sex". It doesn't make any logical sense to go through the whole process of filing a rape charge against a random person unless you believed you were raped. Doesn't mean it cannot happen, it's up to the courts to decide.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:00 AM
-7

Like how many men do you know that lost custody of a child to the mother after she claimed "rape"? I know men who gained full custody of their child after the woman falsely accused them of drug charges or abuse. Show me a case where it actually happened because there is little doubt that false accusations are made, that doesn't mean they are always believed... not to mention the real serious times abuse claims aren't believed and children are murdered because of it (both by mothers and fathers).
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:12 PM
-14

Or maybe she was just raped? The filing of a rape charge is an awfully heavy handed way to handle a regretted sexual experience. I know plenty of women who have regrettable sex, none have filed false rape charges. I know even more women who felt they were raped but because of attitudes like yours they didn't file any rape charges when they should have. I also know a man who didn't file rape charges against a woman because everyone picked on him and said he just regretted it... maybe he was just …
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:09 PM
17

There's no need to circumcise. I have two boys, they are intact. Who wants to have a newborn child immediately put into pain? Good luck and congratulations.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:18 PM
1

First, I simply don't care what feminist say about the whole situation. I'm speaking as a woman who knows other women as we have discussed these fears. Fear of being raped by a man includes the fear of being pregnant with his child, whether there is access to the morning after pill or abortion or not... we do not want to find ourselves pregnant nor do we want to have to prevent a pregnancy from our rapist. There is an idea in our head that we could fight off an attack from a woman as best we can…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:27 PM
1

As far as rape fears goes... let's think about this a bit more logically... if a woman was to rape me, I'm not going to get pregnant. There won't be that extra burden. If a man rapes me, I have the additional concern of getting pregnant. That's why this additional fear exists towards "Schrodinger's rapist". So, I can fear strangers in the context of alone at night and get mugged/raped/beaten, but sorry only the men can insert that extra damage of me getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 07:12 PM
2

They were checking it out to see if it was a hard-on. Not exactly appropriate to be walking around sexually aroused. The jacket lady told the manager that he had a "hard-on", not that they could just see his penis. Total difference between a hard-on in public and cleavage. The women weren't all objectifying him, all were clearly thinking... is that a hard on?? (Some were obviously just checking off his package after the initial reaction.)
/r/MensRights20/10/12 07:07 PM
-1

A man practicing chivalry, in a day and age where it is not required, shows some compassion. It is rather nice.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:30 PM
0

Chivalry was a code for knights on how to basically treat/help/protect those who were weaker than them and to respect others. It was for knights, not all men. It was something that was laid down for knights considering soldiers haven't always had "good behavior" towards others off the battlefield. I believe there are also religious aspects of it.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:27 PM
-2

Chivalry is not totally gone. I've had teenage boys open a door for me. I've had guys run up and open a door for me, then walk away. It is not dead completely, though it is less wide spread and certainly not as encompassing as it used to be (my guy friends used to insist on paying for me though we were just friends, that doesn't happen so much now). I do believe every act of true kindness should be appreciated and a similar kind gesture returned when possible. I was always taught that way... men…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:31 PM
-1

Naw, all that goes right out the window in Middle School.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:26 PM
-2

No way, you always save the best for last!! I've always been taught to let the weaker/younger go first. Not because they are special or have some privilege but just because. I work with kids. I don't think girls magically need to be taught chivalry like boys do. Whether from conditioning or genetics, girls are already more gentle. Boys need to be reminded of that. It's like when I give the kids "high fives" for a job well done, only the boys ever have to be reminded to not smack so hard... the g…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:23 PM
-4

Actually, it was a code of ethics of how a gentleman (knight, more specifically) treated other people, not just women.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:19 PM
1

In the late 60s, 70s perhaps? haha I think there was all that free love and then the 80s/90s kinda squashed it a bit.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:18 PM
-1

Yeah, that would make the most sense.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:08 PM
1

Yeah, I don't think most people would like it at all whatever gender.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:06 PM
-4

Well, this lesson is maybe four days the girls get off first, but unlike in the past... there is a day the boys get off first too, so at least they are teaching some reciprocation. (I don't know why they separate who sits where based on sex in the first place though, that part is kinda silly.)
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:44 AM
-5

Nah, it should be a choice. As much as women should have the choice to take on traditional female roles, so should men.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:42 AM
-14

Nah, more like the men who refuse to practice chivalry at all are all alone on their own. Chivalry is a code of ethics extending far beyond how a man treats a woman.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:41 AM
-4

Yeah, and one day both sides of the bus will decide what they want to do.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:39 AM
-15

How in the world is getting off the bus first a privilege? I always wait till everyone gets off of anything first. lol Lots of places still teach chivalry. They should also teach girls how to graciously accept chivalry and ways to repay chivalrous behavior that isn't about sex. lol
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:19 AM
3

I have two boys, they are intact. People make this an issue all the damn time. It is annoying! Why is it an issue? Because I remind them that boys can be healthy without being cut. I remind them that as a mother we can say no to harming a child. When they ask why I didn't do it, I tell them the truth... because all my children have a right to what happens to their body. Some women get annoyed and asked what I would have done if their father wanted it done, I tell the truth, I tell them I would r…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:37 AM
2

lol Well, I might not be able to walk but that probably would scare anyone off!
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:12 AM
1

We're talking about catcalling a woman. What does that have to do with the comfort of men??? Nothing at all. Want to start a discussion about the comfort of men, go ahead, start a new discussion. The comfort of men has nothing to do with the comfort of women being harassed on the streets.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:11 AM
1

TV commercials aren't an indication of what is actually being bought. Most women are not anymore materialistic than most men, they just buy different stuff. I know a lot of guys who own more tennis shoes than I own total shoes, so you're off base. Some humans are materialistic.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:08 AM
2

I think it's horrendous if it is happening. I'm older than probably most here and girls just did not do that to random guys they didn't know.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:06 AM
1

What are we missing about a man's comfort when he is cat calling a complete stranger??? Is the man an idiot who can't walk down the street without shouting random unwanted trashtalk lest he falls down cuz he can't walk straight unless he's telling a woman how nice her boobs are??? Really, what comfort is a person infringing upon when they don't want to have compliments paid to them or they don't want to be harassed on the streets?? (I'm of the mindset that a quick compliment from a stranger who …
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:12 AM
9

Any pointers on how I could suddenly grow 20 inches at my age???
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:04 AM
10

Rare is the man who I know that has been groped by a stranger woman in public. While I know a few guys who have been groped in public, one was a male stripper. I cannot think of any time that I thought... oh, you should have liked it. @@ Nobody should be touched in a sexual manner by a stranger, never ever. A man should never touch any stranger and a woman should never touch any stranger. Most people don't find it acceptable, though I agree most people probably don't think it happens to men or t…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:03 AM
9

So, when the random dude grabbed his crotch and yelled "Hey, chickie chickie come get some of what I want to give you" to me when I was just a teen (and I'm paraphrasing since I can't remember the exact wording) I was just getting a pity compliment and I was flattering myself by thinking he meant something sexual by it? Cuz, I don't see no compliment there any damn where. Not to mention all the "come get its" and "you'll like it" promises, or "I've always wanted to bed a redhead" wishes that hav…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:58 AM
7

Wrong, no. An idiot, yes.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:50 AM
1

Yeah, I can certainly understand that.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:28 AM
1

And just who the hell are women buying all that shit for? Not just themselves, duh duh duh. I would buy crap for my kids and husband and on rare occasions buy for myself. I know lots and lots of women like that. ALL media is not directed at women's interests, cuz I don't give a shit about beer or cars for one thing.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:27 AM
1

Hahaa...zombies can't type! They apparently can't even open a door knob.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:24 AM
-4

Don't worry, read the comments there are some sensible men here after all.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:58 PM
2

Yep, I'd have the same feelings if she were a man. You don't carry on driving people in a situation like that. Stop, call the police... don't continue trying to drive. However, maybe he was following company policy, I don't know. It seems risky to continue driving in that situation.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:57 PM
0

I don't know, I've been alive for a long time, no doubt men drivers take more chances. However, I suppose that could be from conditioning and it might be something girls are catching up to with more freedom.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:54 PM
1

She should definitely be charged.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:45 PM
0

Right, if he had punched her right away I'd be more forgiving.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:44 PM
-1

The article said he was arguing with her as he drove. How is that safe for passengers? So, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:41 PM
0

No matter what happens, you don't punch your customers, bad customer service. Stop the bus, call the police. Physically throwing her off the bus, okay... punching her in the face... not okay. He didn't punch her in the face to stop her, he punched her after she stopped. He argued with her on the bus while driving... not safe. Stop the bus, call for backup. Obviously the bus company needs a better way to deal with unruly passengers because drivers should not be engaging in arguments while driving…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:37 PM
1

Ahaha! But later when those cows are asleep you can tip them over for revenge! Can't do that with kids... I kid, I kid... some jobs are undoubtedly harder than others. I would probably watch a bunch kids before I'd chase cows in the rain, true.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:14 PM
0

lol Who does that? I could do that kind of stuff in nearly every job I've had at some point during down times. Heck, every job I've had technically I could walk out the door and leave everyone behind to fend for themselves if I got sick, can't do that at home with three kids!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:04 PM
1

I meant comparing military pay to military pay. Obviously, some jobs in the civilian sector pay better than the military. :)
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:54 PM
1

I had way more breaks in the Navy! Heck on 12-hour shifts when all the planes were out on missions, we'd nap.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:53 PM
1

Yeah, but at the same time how do you measure one same job against another same job? The military has the same basic pay scale with extra pay added in (flight pay, hazardous duty pay), I think that is a very fair fixed pay scale.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:20 PM
0

Naw, it's what cursing through their veins... testosterone is a bit more aggressive than estrogen is. Can't discredit the hormones.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:14 PM
0

Well, if it is just housekeeping, not too bad at all. But housekeeping with two kids in diapers, one other kid running around, cooking dinner, washing laundry, scrubbing pots and pans... etc. etc. is a lot harder than when I was in the Navy! True story.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:12 PM
0

Not if you have a point blank pay schedule as many school districts do. A person who is a teacher's assistant in a class of autistic children with behavior issues in the ABA program is paid the same as a person who works in RSP which is basically working with children who struggle with learning disabilities and aren't behavior issues. Whose work is "harder"? Without a doubt that TA in the ABA program is working a lot harder but getting paid the same.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:11 PM
1

lol Well, it says I have 3 points so I guess some folks raised it up. Look, I was in the Navy and guys would complain about the PT standards and then I pointed out the facts while discussing the issue with a male Senior Chief who was the Maintenance Chief in charge of the entire Maintenance Department... I asked who in my shop did the best on the PT test, it was a guy. Then I asked, who in my shop is the one you'd take on detachment where you needed the best of the best on your crew, he said me.…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:08 PM
1

Yeah, I've never been a fascist, not for a second. In my mail each election I get all kinds of crap on how women should vote, how Republicans should vote, how veterans should vote and because I have a Hispanic last name how Hispanics should vote. There's no "how men should vote" crap because they are subdivided into a million other things. Yeah, actually, dipshit... I've seen bachelor pads that are full of fancy ass new electronics like blue ray players, Tivo, X-box 360 with Kinect and Playstati…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:55 PM
2

I don't know the stats on that... but I have been on missions where we found mass graves and they were overwhelmingly women, children, and the elderly... pretty easy to take out a whole village if the fighting men are off somewhere else with all the weapons. Nobody is safe when there is a war being fought in your country.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:50 PM
0

It's all the same work with the same concept. Working harder as a teacher assistant in one classroom will not get you paid more than if you had an easier job at another classroom in the same school. But either way, pay is not exactly tied to a hard job and/or better schooling across the board.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:49 PM
-1

lol... Well, I was comparing the pay of teacher's assistants in some places to teacher's assistants in other places... same work, different pay. Of course, different cost of living in different areas too. But still... some part time jobs can pay more than full time jobs... that was my only point. :)
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:09 AM
1

Yeah, but some guys here just hate women. They don't want to think logically. Imagine: You get into a cab with a giant lollipop. Cab driver says he's always wanted to eat a giant lollipop and he read about this story of how a person killed another person for his giant lollipop... next you know you're like, "So, uh... would you like a lick, so I won't die???"
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:00 AM
-1

You said full time pays more than part time and I'm just saying not necessarily... Full time 35 hours a week @ $8/hr is $280. Full time 40 hours a week @ $8/hr is $320. Part time 25 hours a week @ $14/hr is $350.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:57 AM
2

Recent wars... yes. Iraq Body Count Project 105,000-115,000 Civilian Deaths Not sure if they only count Civilian deaths or if that would include insurgents and/or Iraqi military and police. In contrast, America has lost over 4,000 military. Not convinced: World War II 40 million to 52 million Civilian deaths (these includes war related famine and disease) 22 million to 25 million Military Dead War isn't kind to anyone! (Though I'd like to point out that your chances of dying were higher in the m…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:47 AM
4

Fine... let's have men get estrogen shots every day and then see if you meet your same standards. Military Fitness requirements are not biased towards men, they are geared to the fact that men and women have different bodies. Women's bodies should naturally have more fat, men's bodies should have more lean muscle. That's a fact of nature, not a place to whine about how hard men have it. Shit, I'm a Navy veteran and the PT test is not that hard at all. The guys used to have trouble touching their…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:21 AM
-1

Really... full time at McDonald's $8/hr at 8 hours is $64. Part time at a cooler job $14/hr at 5 hours is $70. Say what... lol.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 06:10 AM
1

I read the article really quick and it said that the rides are set up in advance. So, they aren't going around driving the streets or necessarily waiting to go out on immediate calls. I bet that is how they get away with it, it is a service set up for a specific need.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:49 AM
1

I think it has something to do with the reckless driving that cab drivers are "known" for. I swear I almost died in a cab a few times!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:47 AM
1

No, she posted a rant about a dumbass cab driver who told her rape and murder stories while she was alone with a stranger at night.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:45 AM
3

You are not wrong in feeling what you felt in that cab. It's not smart to be a stranger in control of a car, late at night and then start telling rape and murder stories. Trust me, if you're a female cab driver and you pick up a father with his baby and you start telling him stories about how crazy women will kidnap babies when they cannot have their own and then mention you have no babies... that father is going to be like, "WTF, is my cab driver thinking about stealing my kid?" No doubts... it…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:43 AM
1

You're alone in a cab with a stranger in the middle of nowhere at night... and that person brings up rape and murder... yeah, you're not going to feel safe after that. Duh.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:39 AM
-2

lol Have you ever actually stayed at home for weeks at a time with kids, keeping and cleaning house and cooking? Sorry, but an outside job is easier!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 05:35 AM
1

Sometimes I think some of the guys on here are just worried about themselves and not men in general. But that's just because many seem too anti-woman to actually be concerned with real issues men may face in our society.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:54 PM
6

A lot of guys on here tend to be anti-women, not pro-men's rights. What kind of person makes an argument that somebody has the right to take pictures up a girl's skirt? I've argued with guys about that here and they take it as a slam to male's sexuality and trying to control where a man looks and what he does with the pictures he takes on his own camera. Hard to take these guys and their "lack of rights" seriously. It doesn't matter if it is your wife or her body, these guys have the right to st…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:34 AM
1

Sorta... you act as if the reason a woman has an abortion is only because she doesn't want to be a mother. That's very short sighted. I almost had to have two abortions because I got very sick. It had nothing to do with wanting to be a mother. And just because women can choose an abortion doesn't mean every woman believes in abortion. The problem with the equation is that men seem unable to stop an adoption if they wish to keep the child. That is indeed a huge problem. If the father wants the ch…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:43 AM
0

All about men getting full control of women and children. It is not in the best interest of most children to forcefully put them up for adoption because one person isn't adult enough to be responsible. how about changing the law so that the child is put up for adoption when the fathe rdecides to opt out. That's exactly the same as when a woman decides to abort a preganacy against the father's wishes - he is deprived of his child the same way. Sounds like a whiny three-year-old upset that his big…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:49 AM
-1

That's just stupid. Men and women should both be responsible for the children born to them. Men and women now both have access to birth control of some form. Men can't choose what to do with their post-fertilization body?? WTF kind of crack do you smoke? Men are free to do whatever the hell they want with their own bodies after they become fathers, you're full of crap there. Even if women have access to abortion, that doesn't change the fact that a person's desire to become a parent does not tru…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:31 PM
-1

Oh, you are so full of shit. So, a woman decides what happens to her own body and now men are crying all foul that they have no reproductive rights? WTF? Having no reproductive rights is the government telling you that you must have sex with someone, you must have kids, you must not have kids, you can never wear a condom, or you can never have a vasectomy. How in the world are men actually lacking reproductive rights? You are going to whine, I guess, that the fact that women have full rights to …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:49 PM
1

The adoption issue isn't legal, I don't think. The few times I've seen it, the man lets the woman off the hook, he doesn't even try to make her pay child support. Legally, I don't know what the law says.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:37 PM
1

You put your samples (hair or spit) into the test tubes and send it off to a lab which sends you the results. Not admissible in courts since they can't control whose hair/spit it is, but good for someone who just needs to know as the first step or something.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:34 PM
-1

I don't know one person or law that treats men as expendable today. It's all in your head. Even when women had no equal rights they weren't treated as expendable.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:21 PM
1

Men have the same reproductive rights they've always had, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:20 PM
3

What? I said nothing of the sort. The biological parents should be paying.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:05 AM
2

Sorry, sorry... I forgot to put in my except for male infant circumcision clause.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:16 AM
-2

Men have more non-job related injuries too. Women visit the doctor more, I don't know... but if they do that probably saves more money in the long run catching stuff before it costs a lot more money to fix it later when it has gone wild.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:01 AM
-4

I was willing to consider your notions until you said, "men should have basic human rights" crap. Men already do.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:00 AM
-2

Except once the child is born it's not really about the woman anymore is it? It's about the child now. A financial abortion is nothing more than men being pissy they no longer have a final say in a woman getting and staying pregnant. It's about the child's needs, once the child is born. I have no issue with changing adoption to be more fair because it does seem unfair that the woman has sole control over adoption. If the woman doesn't want the child but the man does, she should still pay the fat…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:58 AM
5

I've seen DNA tests in the drugstore. You can get them on Amazon. They may not be admissible in court but for your own peace of mind and of course if it was negative, you should be able to use that as a catalyst to get a court ordered DNA test.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:51 AM
7

I have no problems with these kinds of cases today. Shoot I've seen DNA kits in the drug store, this shouldn't stop any man from checking to see if he is the father. It's just wrong, so very wrong to claim someone is the father when they are not.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:48 AM
-2

Policies are also higher for being single vs. married and young vs. old. One way or another the statistics is what kills those with higher premiums, not sexism. At any rate, I always thought all of that was silly and car insurance should be based on record and repair costs for the type of vehicles insured. It's not anti-male in conception.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:18 AM
2

Women get pregnant more often than men, very true. Men injure themselves more often, no? They have greater health issues, well according to MRAs on here... so technically it would be the men who would pay more health insurance.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:15 AM
3

I hope he gave a reason!
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:57 AM
4

I find that very odd. Never heard of it before as I know people who've been drug tested all the time. What reason did they give to not drug test her?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:36 AM
1

Why go through your posts before this and make no sense? This post makes a bit more sense even if I don't necessarily agree with your points. I was in the Navy, aside from the PT test I had to meet all the same standards as men did. But that's the Navy, it's different from the other branches. Certain standards necessary to the job should remain the same... perfect reason as to why the Navy Seals are still men. This doesn't mean that women owe men some kind of compensation. War as a conflict reso…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:34 AM
0

Blah blah blah... wrong. Unless of course you make out with all your friends and plan on sticking your tongue down your guy friends' throats.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:11 AM
4

Yeah, most people in these cases have their hair tested.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:57 AM
1

Actually, I thought you were someone else. Why the hell doesn't Redditt have avatars or signatures to more easily distinguish people. But as to this whole stupid notion that women owe men something, it is utter bullshit. You dismiss what women have done through the centuries and act like it is nothing. I daresay that I don't owe some 25-year-old idiot anything because he had to sign up for the Selective Service. I freaking served in the Navy, I don't owe him shit. Women don't owe men shit... wom…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:51 AM
-1

I wasn't speaking a 15-year-old girl. I was speaking of 15-year-olds. And whether they are mature or not, no 40-year-old man or woman should have the right to sleep with a teenager who is not an adult. There's no way for the law to determine which 15-year-olds are informed enough and which ones aren't, so since sleeping with someone needs to be an informed decision between two people on the same maturity scale, then no grown adults don't have any rights to a child's/teen's body. At what age do w…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:25 AM
5

Age of consent laws in every state should (but don't) have age difference exception laws. In my state I believe it is 3 years. So, if an 18-year-old slept with a 15-year-old, neither would be in trouble. However, there's no fucking way a 40-year-old should have some kind of right to sleep with a 15-year-old. Just saying...
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:12 AM
16

Have the lawyers request a drug test on her, this will probably result in him needing a drug test too, but that's at least the first step. Good luck, this is all fathers need to do to get emergency custody of child with druggie moms. Get this test done as soon as possible, photographic evidence won't be enough but a positive drug test will be.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:08 AM
2

Society rules are: Whoever asks for the date either a) pays for the date or b) discusses going dutch before the date. To do anything else is extremely rude. As to the askee: you do not under any circumstances offer to pay for part of the date during the date, that's rude and assumes the other party cannot afford it. If the askee wishes to go dutch they too should say so before the date because they would not be genuine if they did a fake grab for the check with no real expectation of paying half…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:16 AM
1

I have no problem with it being really annoying to have to sign up for the Selective Service. I have two boys, I don't really want them signing up either. I would however tell them off if they felt like women owed them compensation for just being on the list, ya know? That's what was wrong in my eyes. I'm a Navy veteran and I understand what veterans have done for this country. I've known men who served during Vietnam and such, and to me those men earned whatever complaints they have about war t…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:56 PM
1

Women wanted equality and I gave it to them. You didn't give women shit. You are not a martyr for any cause. And with this you've proven you are just a whiny baby who is sad that on the top of "King of the World" mound, there are women up there who have earned their place and you haven't. Are you a military veteran? Are you an educator of children? Do you fight fires? Do you arrest the bad guys? No, you aren't any of that and haven't "earned" your place, yet you feel entitled to complain that wo…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:52 PM
1

True, some of us women go serve in the military instead of whining about being on a list when they can't be drafted now.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:35 AM
1

Incorrect. What we had before feminism were human health issues and services. It was never male-centered. It was family-oriented, for men, women and children. Today almost nothing is funded for mens health issues. Men have to pay for all of it through insurance or out of pocket. Women dont. Men pay for womens health program and services funding through our taxes. I believe men not having equal access goes against the womens claiming to want for equal rights Almost nothing is funded for Men's Hea…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:14 AM
0

OMG! The White Feather Brigade that existed once in the UK during WWI started by a man and had male and female participants... this is not part of American culture. Blame British people, but not women. My dad does stupid stuff all on his own. Nobody tells him to, in fact every SO he's had would tell him not to do it. **Yes... most indeed I teach them about jerks... I don't want any of my kids to unnecessarily fear the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:53 AM
1

Yeah, true.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:45 AM
1

Well, that's not logical is it. If I want all my male relatives safe, and all my neighbors want their male relatives safe... who's going to go war?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:44 AM
1

Well, I'm down with Funday!!! While it is true that a certain number of signatures is needed I think there is some kind of other filter too.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:43 AM
1

You may have some points, but honestly mostly you are full of crap. Men's Wellness Programs, just for starters is nearly every medical program in existence. So much of health problems has been directed to or studied only on men, that's why there is Women's Health Issues. What job do you do? I am a Navy Veteran I dare say that I actually understand the whole concept of actually performing a job with risk. What do you do? Women cannot do jobs that people won't hire them for. Your whole women must …
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:42 AM
0

I would consider that peer pressure. I have taught all my children not to give into peer pressure and only do what they really want to do. One of my children would never do anything he didn't want to do. My daughter would do some of the things others asked if she felt they might like her and my youngest son most definitely does things to make others happy. No, sorry women do not act that way anymore than men act that way. In fact, I don't know a single woman who has ever asked or wanted a man to…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:57 AM
2

I have a friend who through similar situations didn't see his adult son for nearly an identical time period. The mother also said a lot of bad things and they were actually true. But his son sought him out and they have a pretty darn good relationship now despite having no connection during childhood. Show him that you do care after all, but be willing to accept he may want nothing to do with you since you apparently didn't try to contact him after he was 10, even if your ex told you to stop see…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:37 AM
0

True, I don't know who all the trolls are and who are just crazies. lol I'd like to see more discussion from the guys who are more level headed and aren't into hating women more than they are into discussing real issues men face. Like I said posts ago, I have two sons. I'd like to see what they will be dealing with. I don't have brothers so I'm not privy to a lot of this stuff on an intimate level.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:16 AM
0

You would really believe some guy hasn't said that on this sub? Please... don't be silly. There's enough comments on this sub I'd rather you not believe me than spend any time and going to look for those comments.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:10 AM
0

Okay, you do have a point... people will choose to send their neighbor off to war before they send their own. But that's because people are selfish, not just women. Ya know what, I think it is fair to say that some people will take advantage of whatever they think they can. So, yeah some women may shoot their mouths off when they have someone there to defend them. I've seen the same behavior from men. Women may use shame to get men to do things for them, but men may use shame to get women to do …
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:09 AM
0

I don't pay attention to trolls, especially not the stupid kind like you. You're not worth it to me.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:05 AM
0

Really, you think I have the time to go back and find those posts?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 05:04 AM
1

I seen all kinds of things here concerning rape culture. I don't know where to start. Some guy/s on here have suggested that a woman asks to be raped and/or cat called based on what she chooses to wear.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:07 AM
1

Rape culture exists. Do you really deny that? Actually, I would say that rape culture is something even women partake in. The whole concept behind a woman asks for rape by the way she dresses (for starters) is dead wrong and does nothing but blame the victim.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:58 AM
1

Well, please enlighten me how do general rape laws work against mens' rights? We know some state laws use language that suggests only women can be raped... what more do you mean?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:51 AM
1

Nice try. I did actually know a guy who was raped by a woman and wouldn't report it. His friends all made fun of him saying he just regretted it because they were both drunk and she wasn't "hot". I was the only one on his side saying it's not okay she did that. I wouldn't make a woman report a rape, so I didn't suggest that he had to either. At any rate, what does that have to do with general rape? In fact his case proves the issue that some people are raped because they are too drunk to say "no…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:31 AM
4

This also doesn't include the anxiety of dealing with the plane whose bathroom door did not lock and I'd have to ask some nice guy to stand guard and/or hold the door shut while I peed in midflight with turbulence.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:25 AM
8

lol My squadron flew Orion P3Cs. There was a "restroom" with a "toilet" but it did not flush. The guys had this mobile urinal tank thing they peed in. But girls had to either pee in a cup or set up the toilet themselves. For a while, I just peed into the cup until one of the flight crew took pity on me and showed me how to set up the non-flushable toilet so I wouldn't have to deal with that. That then entailed putting a plastic bag into the toilet (lifting up this and that and securing it this w…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:24 AM
1

Really, you are going to deny some women are sex workers against their will in America? Why in the world would you do that? It freaking happens, whether they come to this country freely and later are forced into it, whether they are brought here for those specific reasons or whether they are born here. This is much different than the women who choose to be prostitutes knowing all that it entails. I don't know what the fuck feminists say about the damn issue. I only know what I've seen on televis…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 03:16 AM
0

Scary indeed.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:35 AM
0

I saw a show on it. (Yeah, don't believe everything you see on tv). But there's little doubt that this exists. Never actually any evidence. Hell, a couple of places in LA have been busted for having "slaves" sewing apparel. Or does that not exist either? The police see it as an issue, the FBI sees it as an issue, I'm sure women's rights groups have taken on the issue. That doesn't mean it is not an issue.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:15 AM
0

I'll some quick work for you... http://www.caseact.org/learn/humantrafficking/ It says California harbors 3 of the FBI's 13 highest child sex trafficking in America. I'd say that was a problem. http://www.chennaichildren.com/statistics-on-human-trafficking/ Says 15,000 to 18,000 trafficked workers are in the US. Not sure if that includes people forced to work or just sex slaves. Men who visit these places for cheap sex wouldn't be turning anybody in, now would they?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:12 AM
0

Widespread brothels, I doubt it. Google it, if you don't believe me. It happens, all kinds of things happen in the U.S. There must be some kind of an issue here in CA if they pushing through a bill. The expose I saw was in an immigrant community, I doubt your average American man spends any time in immigrant communities of large cities.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:05 AM
0

Why would someone traffic in the US? Well, if you hold hostage Americans who can speak the language and know the laws and can freely move in society, they will escape every time they get a chance. It's much easier to keep someone locked up if they know they aren't supposed to be here, can't speak the language, and don't know where in the world to go. And as you stated Americans expect to be paid, whereas with trafficked sex workers you can keep every penny and decide the exact small amount neces…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:43 AM
13

I was in the Navy. Women had to pee in a cup on the plane. I came out of that restrooms to negative comments enough times that I did begin to experience some anxiety about using the restroom on a plane full of men. You may think that is silly, but when it happens enough to you it's just not fun. Of course, I still peed and started telling them off for saying stuff when I came out/went in.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:36 AM
0

Uh, not exactly. I'm just saying sex trafficking does exist in America. It was based on something in Seattle so that wouldn't necessarily reflect what California may need to do.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:22 AM
0

Ha, well then perhaps you are even scarier. What about general rape is anti-male?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:21 AM
-2

Some women aren't taken seriously either, which is part of why the original law was created. I've been there when police didn't arrest my uncle after he beat my aunt because it was a domestic issue. Back then, a woman might have wanted to press charges but wasn't taken seriously. Or the police were tired of showing up to the same house as the same person was beaten by the same person, but the person beaten wouldn't press charges. The issue is a serious one because of past problems. I agree that …
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:19 AM
1

I just watched an interesting expose of Seattle police who worked on a sex trafficking task force. I had no doubts that sex trafficking exists in America... when the "pimp" or "madam" helps you to illegal enter the country or holds all your passport/visa paperwork, forces you to service customers with sex, then that is human trafficking. There were no husbands or "friends" involved.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:10 AM
3

The way to fix this is to change the laws regarding who is a real sex offender. How many public urinators are actually on CA's Megan's Law list? I do know a few men on there are statutory rapists and I do believe we need to better examine them to be sure we are making a distinction between rape of a minor against their will and statutory rape of a minor with their consent. I wouldn't use this a reason to vote against Prop 35, because making sex offenders disclose their internet accounts is proba…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:06 AM
-2

I don't believe in infant circumcision for any reason and said it was definitely a men's rights issue. Then, you fail... the draft doesn't exist anymore because they already decided nearly 40 years ago that it wasn't right. Gender roles are not necessarily men's rights' issues, but certainly people's rights issues. The court systems have massive problems. Shrodinger's Rapist? Is this a law, a right's issue. Rape in general???? For real?? Demonization of male qualities/sexuality??? Oh, yeah you l…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:41 AM
1

Typo. Sorry.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:18 AM
0

Oh, I'm sure he just sticks around to cause issues. He makes the whole concept behind Men's Rights look bad. I have two sons, I came here to see what people are talking about. What do I have to teach my boys and what kind of issues are you guys talking about.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:16 AM
0

Oh, perhaps you are too young to see when everyone online argument boils down to one side calling the other side a bunch of Nazis. The White Feather thing was in England during WWI. It was started by a MAN. Yeah, the woman did it but as far as I know the campaign was done by both men and women. It was one instance in England. I hardly think that represents American sentiment today.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:14 AM
-2

Primary aggressor... that somebody is sometimes the woman. That does indeed happen. The law doesn't say in domestic abuse situations, when nobody presses charges, the male must go to jail. It says that if an accusation is made, the person accused goes to jail. That's a good thing. Look up the history of why they started doing that. And it stretches beyond male/female relationships. It could be a father/daughter, mother/daughter. Heck, I saw an episode of Cops where the daughter called 911 and in…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:12 AM
-2

Wow, the white feather brigade has now sunk to the level of claiming something is Nazism online. Women don't want to send their sons to war. No doubts about that. Are you serious? You think it was all peachy for a mother in the 1940s to watch as her 18-year-old son was forced into service? Trust me, women weren't happy about it and they sure as hell didn't invent or support the policy. That was a man thing.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:09 PM
0

Primary aggressor policies? I don't know what that means. Do you mean in consideration of domestic violence? If a woman says a man hit her, he should be arrested. If a man says a woman hit him, she should be arrested. That's because of the fact that abused people can have the shit beat out of them and call the police, but not file charges. Sorry, but every single person I've actually known in that situation were women abused by men. Every single case of a woman abusing a man, that I know about, …
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:05 PM
-1

Exactly. Like the dude on here crying that women owe him compensation for having to sign up for the Selective Service, when in fact women probably would all vote against a draft. Women don't want their sons, their brothers, their husbands, their fathers sent off to war against their will. The draft is a male created system, a system created and kept alive by other men, not women. Though I will give the MRAs the issue of circumcision. On that issue, they are correct.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:08 PM
1

My point was that it doesn't always happen the men will be punished harsher. Each case should be judged on its own merits, not on some subjective male/female rights issue. When it comes to the justice system, there are indeed obvious flaws. Minorities receive the harshest sentences of all. But we also have to be honest and look at the whole picture, men tend to have longer records, so they will eventually receive harsher sentences. So, if a woman just kills her newborn baby and has no prior conv…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:54 PM
1

Wow, you really are stupid aren't you? The only sad thing is that the men in this subreddit either don't read your shit or willingly allow you to make them bad. Those with a brain already realize that I wasn't trying to make myself out to be a heroine. (I'm a girl, so I wouldn't be a hero anyway, duh.)
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:51 AM
193

I hope that is fake because that's possibly the worst piece of advice I've seen in a long time!
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:26 AM
5

You're actually kinda wrong. Case in Point: Amy Grossberg and Brian Peterson murdered/didn't murder their newborn baby boy in a hotel back in 1996. Peterson plead guilty to manslaughter and served a 2-year sentence. Amy Grossberg was sentenced to 2 1/2 years. Of course you are also negating postpartum psychosis which is something only the birthing mothers can get, 14-year-old boys who murder infants will never suffer from postpartum psychosis. Now, that's not an excuse to murder one's child, but…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:15 AM
0

The sexual assault occurs when he places his microphone on the one woman's breasts.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 10:09 PM
1

I think my ex and I know each other well enough to know we can feel safe that neither of us will cause any harm to our children. Of course I have also taught my children to tell an adult when somebody hurts them. They have been taught that even if I were to hurt them or their father was to hurt them, they need to tell their teacher. Of course they were like, oh mom you won't hurt us and I was like what if I got some strange sudden psychosis and I chase you around the kitchen with a knife... get …
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:48 PM
1

My kids' father and I have discussed this issue. Yes, we trust the other's ability to pick a good partner, that's not the issue. We have both seen situations where an "evil step parent" goes under the radar and everyone is surprised. It happens a lot, so I don't wish it to happen to either of us. As something we have discussed, it is an issue we equally both have. He almost has more of an issue because we have a teenage daughter. You can trust a new SO all you want, but that trust doesn't preven…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:46 PM
1

No, but nice try. Especially with just girlfriends or boyfriends, I don't think it is good for children to get close to someone who is not in a permanent relationship (marriage) with their parent. If the relationship gets more serious, obviously things would have to change a lot. No, I personally don't want to control their father and his actions. No, he doesn't want to control me and my actions. It's a very scary thing to allow another person that you aren't close to ( your ex's SO) and don't k…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:52 PM
1

You are not very bright if you actually believe that sitting on a list means shit. It sure as hell doesn't mean a damn thing. Anyone can be drafted with a change in policy at any given time. The Selective Service may make calling people up easier, but the Selective Service is not what makes any draft possible. And you are too dense to grasp that. All that has to be done is for The President to order a draft of any group of people he sits fit. Right now, I concede women can feel comfortable they …
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:28 PM
1

There's a difference between creating positive relationships between the kids and new SOs and the SO being the primary caregiver to the kids? No? You don't think so? It's one thing to make popcorn for the kids and sit down and watching a movie together and the "GF" or "BF" doing all the care for the child. I'm the mother to three kids. I expect their father to take care of our kids when he is with them. He doesn't have a girlfriend but if he did I wouldn't want her bathing my kids, cooking all t…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:10 PM
1

I don't actually know any feminists, so I reckon I can't comment too much on their issues. But I agree with you that these campaigns seem more about them making money than about actually about awareness and cures. I think there are some very sad statistics about the whole pink ribbon campaign gone wild, but that's an economic issue. If people can make money, even off of fears and a fake semblance of doing good, they will. I honestly cannot imagine why anyone in their right mind would see testicu…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:59 PM
0

You actually have to take a risk... a real risk, not an imaginary risk in your head. You clearly don't have the intelligence to distinguish real actual risk from whining. Quit being a baby, women don't owe you shit for having a name on a list. The draft is technically illegal, the Selective Service isn't a draft. Stop being stupid, come to me with a real risk you have actually taken. Oh, that's right... you can't, so you attempt to insult instead. Super sad face :( But go right on and spit in th…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:27 AM
-2

Seems fair to me. I know men who have won custody of their children for this exact reason. The person there day in and day out taking care of the child's needs should not get custody because of that, but because the child should remain in the same situation they are most comfortable with, IF, and let me repeat that... IF the parents cannot come to a logical child custody agreement between them. Plus, a big issue of custody comes down to who will be caring for the child in the home. All too often…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:14 AM
1

Except anyone with intelligence will already know that I haven't whined one bit about being in the Navy. Duh, duh, duh... and I'm sure the disabled drafted veterans will think you are an ass too. I don't think anybody should be drafted into military service. But the Selective Service is a far cry from a draft. Even without the Selective Service they can draft anyone. I don't think drafting anyone is a good thing, whether they are a man or a woman. Your debate was women owe you compensation becau…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:22 AM
1

Oh, it's all about slamming women even if that means disrespecting the Navy's role in keeping us safe.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:36 AM
1

Here's the problem. Women weren't allowed to touch their breasts for self-examinations. Women were dying of breast cancer because they wouldn't go to the doctor if something did feel wrong. There's a list of issues for why breast cancer is a different sort of thing for women. As far as I know, testicular cancer is not as common as breast cancer. I'm sure the actual numbers don't actually matter. By women rallying around a cause that overwhelmingly affects them is not saying that women don't care…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:24 AM
1

Yeah, except that I didn't actually bitch nor whine about being in the Navy and anyone with a brain would notice that. I am proud to have served my country. I am proud to be a Navy veteran and your silly ass whining is a slap in the face to the men who have actually been drafted into war.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:13 AM
1

Actually, I was comparing periods, gestation, birth, and menopause to simply signing up for the Selective Service when a draft isn't legal right now and a draft hasn't even been used in 40 years. BUT>>>>> women get joint disorders, men do not have periods. Women get muscle disorders, men do not gestate. Women veterans have needed amputation, men do not go into labor. So... on and so forth... Casualties of war are very far reaching and extend to all members of society within proximity to the batt…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:02 AM
1

Treating someone as only body parts and not a person would be an example of treating someone like a sex objects. Trying to be "friends" with a girl and being super "nice" to her and then crying about the "friendzone" when she rejects you and your sexual advances would an example of treating women as sex objects. Women aren't here on earth to sleep with men who want to sleep with them. That's a male entitlement. As far as I'm aware, dating should involve liking someone's personality so I don't kn…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:14 AM
1

Okay, only after we reverse who gets to have periods for years, carry the future generation, give birth, and then go through menopause. Ya'll men carry the sole burden of incubating people, then we'll talk about how us gals owe you something. While I'm not too much in favor of the Sel. Service and definitely not in favor of any draft, women don't owe this generation squat shit for sitting on their asses on a national list while there are indeed women serving in all branches of the military today…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:02 AM
1

As long as you are a jarhead and not some pansy fly boy, I'll concede that your service record will kick my service record's ass. Like I said I was in the Navy under Bill Clinton, enough said. You really want to act like a 18-25 year-old whiny spoiled baby who had to sign up with the Selective Service is comparable to men in previous generations who really did risk their actual real lives in real actual ways on real actual battlefields, then you just go right ahead. I'll be ashamed for you that …
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:52 AM
2

Thank you for your service. I would be happier if there was no Selective Service at all. I'm a mother and I really don't want any of my kids to sign up.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:37 AM
2

I'm pretty sure I'm not, but I know what you are.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:54 PM
-1

You haven't actually been discriminated against, yet. Do I like the Selective Service, no? I don't like it. I don't like the notion that anybody can be forced to serve in the military whether there is a war or not. I don't like a program that has exclusions, and those exclusions are far more reaching than simply sex. Don't be stupid... the American military is notorious for once having not allowed black men and any women to fight at all, even if they choose to. Women who aren't in the military d…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:46 PM
0

Don't be a dumbass. I'm not complaining about having served my country. I'm very proud of that fact. I'm calling you out on the stupid notion that anybody owes you shit just because your whiny ass had to sign up for the Selective Service. Technically, the draft cannot be done right now. Make no mistake... if there was a big war you'd be too much of a whiny ass to do the duty your nation calls you for. The problem with the draft isn't simply one of which sex is called up for duty, but also which …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:35 PM
2

Considering nobody has fought an invading force since the 1940s and nobody technically fought against an attack on US soil in a long time, you're talking out of your ass. The military has done and continues to do a lot to protect all Americans (and frankly other earthlings) from all kinds of shit that people don't know about and all without fighting against an invading force or an attack on US soil. I served under Bill Clinton, so we had no declared war. That doesn't mean that every single milit…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:23 PM
1

You paid me? I doubt that. I doubt you did anything but shit in your diaper while I was in the Navy, if you were even born. As the law stands right now, the government can't draft you. If the military needs to swell its ranks, it will go to the reserves. If that doesn't compensate, they will ask military veterans to rejoin. The draft has fallen out of favor. I'm more likely to serve if the military needs more people than you are because I'm already trained. The Selective Service exists in case a…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 08:08 AM
1

You haven't actually taken any damn risks at all. You aren't risking shit right now by being in a country with a 100% voluntary military. You're just talking smack. I didn't volunteer to kill, don't be stupid. I did volunteer to risk my life, and to actually risk my life, not sit around and whine about a program that hasn't sent anybody off to war in 30-something years. What the hell is wrong your thought process??? Of course the men who were actually drafted and sent off to war risked and lost …
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:58 AM
4

You haven't been forced to do a damn thing. You haven't actually served one day in the military or fought for any such thing. You are a list of could be's, not a list of I have's. I have served in the Navy, I think you "owe" me for keeping your ass safe and free.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:44 AM
1

Are you American? Were you drafted in the Vietnam War/KoreanWar/WII/any military war? If you are American and you weren't drafted into a war, you aren't a forced slave. A forced slave would actually be someone forced into the military after being drafted. The Selective Service doesn't do that right now. I don't think I owe YOU jack shit because you registered for the Selective Service. I think YOU owe me, cuz I actually went out and served my country... I'm not just riding on the coattails of th…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:33 AM
1

Ah, but you see women used to not be able to talk about sex in any fashion, we used to not be able to talk about our periods or being pregnant. A whole bunch of stuff like that, somewhere along the way we started talking about it without embarrassment. I don't think men can't talk about it, but somehow there is a difference between talking about tampons from a store and talking about a penis.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:18 AM
3

That's just silly. I've never been registered for the Selective Service but I am a Navy veteran.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:01 AM
1

Are you a military veteran? If not, perhaps you should be paying me because I risked my life for you. (Not really, I did serve under Bill Clinton, but still.)
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:49 AM
1

The Selective Service is the male default... why not just end the Selective Service altogether?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:37 AM
2

In my head I framed it as, I'm signing up for a possible 8 years of active service. But I don't think I ever doubted that at any point (even after 8 years if I had done that) my enlistment could be extended up to 6 months. I don't know the numbers on how many people retire from the military vs. people who only serve their obligated active duty. At any rate, everyone in the military should remember that they signed up knowing that they may have to serve up to six months longer if necessary during…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:29 AM
0

I'm a Navy veteran, let's be completely honest here. Everyone who sings up for the military does so voluntarily these days. When you sign all that paperwork you are either personally told by the recruiter about stop loss or you read the damn papers you are signing. Stop Loss can happen to women too. When I singed up for military service I signed up for four years active duty and four years of inactive duty with the possibility of being called up during any of those last four years. Turns out I d…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:08 AM
2

Isn't the point of TKD to get the "hit" in, not to get the hit in hard? It's a matter of skill, not merely strength, right? And if a woman signs up she should be treated like a worthy opponent. If this were boxing, I would agree with the father, but for TKD I'm less inclined to think so. This isn't violence violence, or an angry response to violence, it's a sport.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:49 AM
1

Ah, I see. I understand why you wanted a check up on your kids. But I agree with the police, they don't have to tell you the why of it because that is her personal business that you are no longer privy to. Of course, your ex should have been the one to say, "I'm having some medical procedure and the kids can either stay with you or at this place?" I don't see the point in refusing to give you a choice.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:22 PM
1

These custody issues are really sad. I cannot imagine leaving my children with someone for days, other than their father or someone trustworthy in either of our families. I really think some parents are doing a disservice to their own children by vilifying the other parent after a divorce/break-up. I'm not with my children's father and although there are issues, I know that he will not beat them, harm them, kidnap them, or any such thing. People need to just sit down and look at what is the real…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:43 AM
1

Nah, I'd go to the ACLU. That'd be more fun.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:31 AM
1

lol Well, in my perspective you are arguing with me and I'm simply clarifying what I meant. So, who's arguing with who? Yes, it is not legal for me to walk up to a person and say, "Don't stare at me, you creep." However, I have never even thought to say or do that, but on occasion I sure wish I could go up and say, "Excuse me, is this man your husband?" And if he is that woman's husband, I'd love to tell her that he keeps staring at me, but then I would be rude. You're ignoring the part where we…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:17 AM
1

Look I thought I was responding to the dude who brought up squirrels. If that's not you, then that's who I thought I was responding to the whole time. Oh, good grief... yeah let me shut up because you said so. My point in responding to this thread is that each person gets to be offended by someone staring at them. Because it is their body, not somebody else's body to stare at. My body is mine, so staring at it is up to my discretion. Yes, yours eyes are yours and while I can't tell you not to st…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:51 AM
1

I must apologize because I was responding to you thinking I was responding to someone else. I'm sorry. No need for you to be rude though. I think you stepped in while I responding to someone else and I didn't even notice the name change.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:41 AM
1

Basic human rights are rights whatever the law may say. I try to distinguish between rights and what is a legally given right. You said male sexuality is being attacked when women complain about being stared at, no? I would take that to mean you assume all men do so. I disagree. I say some people do so and it is a part of some people's sexuality but not all men's and not all women's.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:22 AM
2

My high school only had a female volleyball team. So when two guys into beach volleyball asked to try out, the female volleyball coach allowed them to do so. Only she warned them that her volleyball practices were really hard work. They didn't last and quit because they said the workout was too hard. True story. Lots of girls quit after only one day, I think the guys lasted a week or two.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:21 AM
-1

You can declare yourself a "winner" all you want, that's in your head. You brought up something as silly as worrying about what a squirrel sees, that was a part of your argument, not mine. Own your own words. The fact is... it is rude to stare. That was my point... nobody has some inalienable right to stare, people have some expectations of privacy even when they are in public. Legally, there is no recourse, but a human staring will be labeled a creep. A squirrel staring will be labeled a squirr…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:08 AM
-1

I simply don't care... although I'm not.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:09 AM
1

lol I am absolutely sure that won't happen. There are many reasons why I'm not concerned. But in my state... grandparents have very little rights and plenty of people in my family would support my kids in going to their father.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:17 AM
2

Aww, well thank you. I am sure your parents thought that they were doing the best thing for you. My children aren't that old, so there are now doctors supporting parents who choose not to do it. There was a time when they just did it in the hospital and parents would have to be proactive in preventing it.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:06 AM
2

Nope, just an American with only daughters. I don't imagine my children would now let her do it, plus their father wouldn't allow it. She has no legal rights to my children, even if I were to die.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:53 AM
-1

Says the one who brought up staring squirrels...
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:21 AM
2

Sadly, my mother threatened to do that. I was horrified, she claimed she didn't really mean it, but who jokes about taking their grandchild to get an operation without their child's consent???
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:56 AM
-1

People have the right to be offended, when they are offended. People have the right to not be offended, when they are not offended. Of course it is a requirement to not stare at a naked person in public. It is simply not a legal requirement. It is merely a social one. But the real question is, what about the squirrels???
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:43 AM
3

Surprisingly, a lot of people nag about circumcising boys. Yes, i live in the USA. I don't fall for peer pressure and to me the principle is bodily integrity. All my children have a right to their own bodies... save true medical issues.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:32 AM
6

Then clap your hands!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:20 AM
2

My sons are intact. I know it is bad but when someone presses me on the issue, insisting I still need to circumcise them (they are 9 and 11), I resort to saying that they have their whole penis or they have a real penis. Bad, I know... but even as a mother this whole concept is very frustrating. Nothing is wrong with my sons because they are not circumcised.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:08 AM
-1

Your actions in public are viewable by anyone. Whether you are naked or not. Showers are on private property. That is why you have a right to privacy and choose who sees you. However, you can't tell a person not to look at you if you expose yourself to them. My actions may be viewable, duh... but staring is not socially acceptable. Define "expose" yourself... whether I'm naked or not... a person with manners will not stare.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:58 AM
0

If you find it offensive that someone is looking you because he is a man, that is gender base prejudice and it is misandry. If you are offended because someone is looking at you and he is heterosexual, that is a form of sexual contempt and it is heterophobia. The fact that you could consider yourself "harmed" by someone's mere sight of you, explicitly so if it's coming from a man and/or a gynephilic person, is so incredibly off-base and irrational in it's own rights. Actually... not exactly. Bec…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:46 AM
-2

Every person has the right to decide that anyone looking at them is offensive. Every person has the right to get naked and shower with whoever they want, even members of the same sex. It is socially acceptable to shower in a multi-use bathroom with members of the same sex. Those who would choose not to shower in front of others, may do so. It is not wrong for men to appreciate beauty or the female form. Each person though, does get to decide how they handle what is said to them about their body.…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:57 AM
1

Well, the point of feminists would be to fight against objectifying women, no? You wouldn't have expected abolitionists in the 19th Century to bring up issues concerning the taxation of whiskey, no? Apples and oranges. Saying that creepshots is wrong, doesn't mean they are saying women have never done something similar. And certainly the pattern of men doing it is longer and more socially accepted. Women just aren't supposed to be sexually aroused by visual stimulation, so we are "supposed" to d…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:32 AM
1

I don't think so at all. I know a woman convicted of the statutory rape of a male minor. That is something from 1981.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:19 AM
1

I think one is more publicized and known. That's the end of it, plain and simple. I don't think you're going to go around find a lot of women who will find this to be okay. And I don't think you're going to find a lot of people who know these sites exist for men.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:07 AM
1

Okay, I seriously don't know anything about that Guardian stuff. But like I said... people can be creeps and it is wrong. It is not just something men do.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:52 AM
1

How do you know Kira Cochrane even knows the website exists?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:16 AM
1

I have always stated that some women reduce men to mere body parts, I never claimed otherwise. I merely stated your example of tubecrush wasn't an example of that. I am sure there are websites where women do that. I don't know what they are. Yes, I already agreed that both sites were not kind. I didn't know that tubecrush makes any money. I don't think they should. But then again that wasn't in your original tirade.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:59 AM
1

No, I did not say there was anything wrong with anybody appreciating certain parts of the human body. Men do it. Women do it. I happen to like forearms and asses. However, because I have respect for people I'm not going to take pictures of nice asses and post them online. No, according to me... tubecrush isn't as bad as creepershots, not because tubecrush pictures are taken by women, but because they include full body or upper body shots that include the face and do not reduce the man to mere bo…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:43 AM
1

Like I said, neither tubecrush nor creepshots is a good idea. However, don't be silly. Tubecrush's categories of nice pecks or nice arms or whatever still includes full body shots with the man's face, not just some body parts. Yes, I am going to suggest that the notion that a person would objectify another person by reducing them to only body parts, particularly sexual erogenous zones like boobs and ass is all out wrong! You want to classify it as male/female voyeurism because you are sexist aga…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:33 AM
1

If you cannot see what differences exist between tubecrush and creepshots you're just being obtuse. I'm not going to suggest either one is a great idea, but go actually take a look at them. Tubecrush... men in usually full body shots/upper body shots that almost always include their face. Creepshots... boobs and asses, rarely including a face shot. If your mind is unable to grasp the differences, that's really sad. Neither site is exactly respectable of people's privacy, but damn at least tubecr…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:55 AM
4

Exactly! And certainly there are women who would take pictures of any man's manly bits, post them online somewhere, and make fun of them like mad. Whether someone is making fun of private bits or someone is jacking off to private bits, both are an invasion of someone else.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:41 AM
1

It is not expected to treat women as sex objects in today's societies. That's absurd. You can treat a woman as a person, and you'll get along with them just fine. Lots of people think about sex all the time, even women... GASP! We all have a natural inclination to think about sex a lot, only some people don't treat members of the opposite sex as only good for sex. Some of those people are actually men. Any person who calls another person a jerk for not sleeping with them is an idiot. No woman ha…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:16 AM
1

Yeah, although it is hard to hear them, it seems he said something to her that she didn't like.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:12 PM
1

I'm too tired to decipher this, but crying is not childlike whether you are bawling (which men do) or not. But it's not my welcome, it is your welcome and you're welcome too. Yeah, I would call saying "men can't do anything right" a from of misandry. Obviously, men can do some things right. I mean sometimes they pee and it goes into the toilet.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:22 AM
2

I bet the end result would be that men would have to pay more child support, not less. Perhaps, we should do that. Besides, not only women are custodial parents, this type of thing would benefit custodial parents and the children they care for full time. My father is a single parent to a child whose mother has not seen her in 13 years. She is a special needs child and half of what my father spends on her care is probably more than her mother makes.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:05 AM
0

For shame! I have never, ever had a tempure tanrum nor have I ever shead a tear. Crying is not childlike, it is a part of human nature. Even grown men cry. Or perhaps you don't watch The Voice. Yes, let's discuss this like men, but first we'd have to see who can piss the farthest to see who goes first. Don't act like grown men don't do that, they do, I've seen it done. Alas, I'm not going to make a list, because it is silly to do so. I don't actually hate men and my list would be more fun than d…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:34 AM
-1

Why was she getting on your nerves something fierce? Was that before she was trying to hug you or because she was trying to hug you. I don't understand. Sometimes in life we accept the crazies we must know. Is she only hugging you or doing/suggesting other stuff too? If you don't want to be hugged, I'd tell her that. Nobody has the right to hug you against your will and she should take serious note of that. You shouldn't have to scream it at her, for her to understand but apparently you are real…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:53 AM
0

I would raise my game except your grammar is so poor I can't understand all that you are saying. I think I could come up with a long list of how men are just children too. It is silly so I won't do it. The point is that women are not like children, but your grammar is. I'm sure my mental fortitude is quite stellar, I mean I did face the United States Navy as a female and survived. You might want to Google "fortitude", so you can actually use it properly.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:03 AM
3

Men have always used other men as pawns in war, I'm not sure that is a gender issue but rather more of a social class issue. Rich men didn't pressure other rich men into war, they pressured poor men into it. In fact during the Civil War, if you had the money you could buy your way out of the military or pay someone to be your replacement. I don't know what the white feather thing is. But I doubt women, on their very own, wanted their fathers, husbands, sons or brothers to go off to war and possi…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:50 AM
1

Well, when she does attack him she throws herself at him. If I was afraid of being hit back, I would have thrown something at him.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:35 AM
0

Aww, well a lot of guys would not appreciate being told that. I concede that even some women would be okay with that. Either way, a man or a woman saying it to a stranger is risking being labeled as a creep.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:23 AM
1

I did watch as he stood... he doesn't look that much taller to me. She really throws herself at him and punches him, she's got guts for that because I'd never be that stupid. She is not afraid of being hit back.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:09 AM
1

I really don't know a damn thing about fashion. I dress for comfort and based on what temperature I will be dealing with. Slut walks are to say... don't blame the victim. They are to show that a woman is her own person, entitled to her own body, whatever way she is dressed. Sure, there may be a girl going just wear a slutty costume, but so what... she's still not saying "rape me". The point is to call attention to a serious issue, and sorry Charlie the issue is not about attracting male attentio…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:41 AM
1

She don't look half his size to me.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:29 AM
-1

Girls can do it now because there isn't a history of women harassing men. However, I don't really agree with that premise because people shouldn't be sexually harassing people like that... at some point it all will need to stop. Women are feeling liberated in saying what they've thought for years, but could never say. Yet, the real point is... maybe nobody should be objectifying anyone. Although, anyone who posts their naked photos on reddit is probably looking for those kind of responses, so pr…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:07 AM
1

Ah, well thank you for the civil discourse. Have a good night to you and your little princeling. :)
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:40 AM
1

I suggested that the whole concept of men hitting back had to do with men being stronger, not that women were some privileged citizens that were higher than men. I never suggested that any woman couldn't inflict damage on any man. I did say that I couldn't hit a man hard enough. I would tell my sons the same thing I would tell my daughter... do not fight back, get out. Little girls are not being raised to believe it is okay to just hit boys. I should know I'm actively raising children, working i…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:30 AM
1

Yelling for as long as she did probably did instill some fear into that guy. I would consider it assault. Legally, I don't know. Yelling a harsh statement in the face of an ass grabber, would not be assault in my opinion... "Do not touch my ass, you idiot," would not be assault to me.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:29 AM
1

Actually, I'm a Navy veteran and I believe that people should choose what job they can do in the Navy. There are men who can't do every job in the Navy and there are women who can do every job in the Navy. Don't know how suggesting that in general women are weaker than men, suggests that any woman or man can't do whatever job they can do. I'm certainly a weak little woman, but I still did all my job in the Navy (except for the time I tried to move an P3C engine, which I got in trouble for since …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:19 AM
1

No, I'm a woman. I dress to effect no one. Some women dress to effect others, most of those women dress to effect other women, not men. Some women dress to effect men. In fact, all women have the right to dress whatever way they want without being called sluts that asked to be raped because of how they chose to dress. Men don't have that problem, do they? So, of course this is a woman's issue, not a men's issue. When a man gets raped by a woman and the judge says to him, "Perhaps men shouldn't w…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:06 AM
1

Honestly, I don't know that that fits the definition of assault in every state. But it sure wasn't kind. Assault is threatening violence, not just getting into someone's personal space, though that could very well vary by state. I don't remember what's she's doing, but if she was yelling at him while holding up her fist to his face, that would be assault. I'm not sure simple yelling is assault, but it would probably be harassment or disturbing the peace or something.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:55 AM
1

Yes, actually in today's world I would indeed wonder if she did something first. In fact, for a very long time we used to assume a woman did something to garner such a reaction. I was certainly raised that way... don't do something to piss a man off cuz then he can hit you. I would wonder in any situation like this what the other person did to warrant and what is wrong with the person going off too. I can't read her mind... for all I know she wants him to hit her so she can be justified in beati…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:43 AM
0

Sorry, but my advice to anyone being attacked is for that person to get away. Not to attack back, not to attack back two fold, but to get away and call 911. A man with integrity will not hit a woman back. A woman with integrity won't hit a man in the first place. Both notions are absurd. If I were to hit a man, it's not going to hurt him, because in order for it to hurt him, it'd hurt me worse first. So, even if I hit him twice before he easily subdued me (like seriously maybe I could kick Danny…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:32 AM
1

Some people will equal outrage, some won't. I do believe people want to know the why of it. If a father is beating a man because the man just sexually abused his young child, honestly I'm not going to be outraged. If I were there, I'd stop it if I could. If someone grabs my ass, I will chew them out and I should have that right to do so. I'd really want to smack them too, but I'm not dumb. Yes, anyone should have that right to tell someone off if they grab their body rudely. I think we both agre…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:22 AM
0

People should feel outrage at both videos and should want to know the why of both videos. Her reasoning is relevant. If he grabbed her ass and she turned around and gave him a quick mouthful, that's relevant. If she is yelling at him like that because he asked someone else to the dance, she is completely out of order. I don't know that that girl needs to hide behind whatever "female privilege" you read into things because she looks a lot bigger than him. I'd reckon she could do a lot of damage a…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:58 AM
1

I don't understand you. There is nothing a man can wear that will have society scream at him that he is being immodest. And I never said that women don't dress for effect, though women tend to dress for other women, not for men. And women never, ever dress in order to be raped.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:28 AM
1

Wow, sounds like they need to sit down and chat. Good luck to them.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:17 AM
1

I don't think it devalues men at all. I think it is saying that men are stronger than women so men shouldn't hit back. It shouldn't be okay for anybody to hit anybody, really. But I don't think the point is to devalue men, but just pointing out that men are stronger than women. And none of that suggests that women should ever hit men first or stand there screaming at them in a classroom full of people. The only thing I'd say is if that guy was racist/sexist or something to her first and she gave…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:50 PM
1

If both set out to get drunk and get laid, then no that's not going to be rape. However, a person cannot consent to sex while drunk in my state. So, it is best not to have random drunken sex at all... because someone could accuse you of rape. It's not about reading someone's mind at all. It's about being respectful of yourself and others. A person with real respect will not have sex with a drunk stranger because they will recognize that they can't freely give consent. Drunk people want to do all…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:38 PM
1

If you were too drunk to realize what's going on and somebody has sex with you... of course you won't realize it till the next day... so yeah, you wouldn't know you were raped till you found out. Or you're really drunk, somebody starts having sex with you, you panic... pass out... etc. There's several scenarios here. True, if you were just too drunk and ten days later you decide that you were raped, not because you actually feel raped but because you regret it... then that's probably not rape. B…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:28 PM
1

I don't read women's fashion magazines, but what do they say about what clothing is immodest for MEN?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:17 PM
1

Rape laws vary by state. I would most definitely say that if a man wakes up the next morning and believe he was raped and he calls the cops that he should be taken seriously. Neither man nor woman should have to worry about being raped, just because they are in public. Obviously, if two drunk people have sex and wake up fine with it the next morning, and truly fine with it, if they go on later to regret it then there's an issue... there's a difference between later regretting it and feeling like…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 10:05 PM
1

If both are drunk and wanted sex, then it isn't rape. But if both are drunk, have sex, and one wakes up having not wanting to have sex, then yeah that is rape. The trouble maxes up when both wake up feeling raped by the other, that's a true legal quandary that needs to be addressed because the law doesn't address that now. I'm crying foul because you are suggesting that men have some right to sleep with drunk girls because 1) it is not rape 2) girls need to not be drunk in public. That takes us …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:54 PM
0

You think men are physically weaker than women?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:44 PM
1

Sigh... the very definition of rape includes not wanting to have sex in addition to being able to give consent. So, if me and my husband get drunk off our asses and have sex... neither of us can give consent technically speaking. Legally, that could be rape... only when we wake up in the morning we don't consider ourselves raped... therefore we aren't rape victims. There was no rape. The same cannot be said for two drunk strangers who wake up after sex and one feels raped, that then is rape. Yes…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:33 PM
1

Yes, the reason why you'd continue to buy a drunk girl drinks does matter. The essence of a predator is to ensure their victim cannot clearly respond. Unfortunately for men, other men have created a pattern of getting a otherwise unwilling girl into bed by getting her drunk. I'm sure we'll see more cases of women doing the same to men, and that is still rape. Legally speaking, it is rape. Having sex against your consent is NOT a bad mistake, it is rape. Men do not have some legal right to drunk …
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:22 PM
1

Taking the argument to the extreme... perhaps I was merely recounting a real life scenario that actually happened??? Any time in my state a person has sex with a drunk person, said drunk person cannot give consent. If that person files rape charges, it would be considered rape and that would go through the legal channels. Chances are there would be no conviction unless there is a pattern of it happening to others. But legally speaking a drunk person cannot give consent to have sex in my state. H…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:10 PM
2

lol Actually, I didn't have trouble cleaning up after my daughter. It was just constant. I don't clean up after 30 kids now, duh... even though it is special education they do clean up after themselves.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:55 PM
1

Uh, that's how a lot of women feel when being stared at, "Am I doing something wrong, am I being offensive. Have I done something to be stared at for?" That's not sexism, that's reality. And yes, some in society would have none to kind for a woman staring at a man like that, I'm certain many would call her a slut.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:17 PM
1

It is not illegal for a woman to be drunk. It is illegal to have sex with a drunk person that cannot give consent. How is the woman liable at all? She isn't. Let's switch roles. A man is out with friends and they are getting wasted. A girl walks into a bar and orders her first drink of the day. She notices drunk dude has a nice ass in his Levi's and wants to get herself a piece of that. She buys him and his friends a round of drinks, they rejoice! She's "cool" and convinces the guys to leave Lev…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:03 PM
1

Being drunk in public is not a declaration of wanting to have sex. And if someone is really drunk, then they may not even know they went to some place to have sex with someone. None of that is giving consent.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:53 PM
1

Why do you continue to buy a drunk girl drinks? If it is to have sex with her, yeah you are treading into the possible rape scenario. Get consent while you are both sober and that may not be an issue. Yeah, men bear more responsibility because this situation used to be all too common, yet the actual convictions for this type of rape aren't actually that high. I've known a lot of men who used to operate this way, get a girl drunk or find a drunk girl because then they could have their way with th…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:44 PM
1

Only if the bartender took and then posted the photos. As far as I know, posting pictures of yourself naked isn't a crime. In many states a person cannot give consent while drunk, hence it is rape. Neither is a contract legal in some states, if the signer is visibly drunk. Though either one is very hard to prove.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:31 PM
-1

No, it only suggests that men are physically stronger than women.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:20 PM
0

Oh, here you are proving what this movement is all about for a lot of guys here... you are a misogynist. Most women are not children in adult bodies.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:09 PM
2

I had my daughter while I was in the Navy. Working in the Navy while my daughter was in daycare was a lot easier than being a SAHM. I work with special education students now and I'd probably say being a SAHM is easier. The point is... being a SAHParent is not easy and is not always easier than being a working parent. In the Navy, I came home to a clean house that my daughter didn't "mess" up. As a SAHM, I cleaned up after her all the dang time. She couldn't make those messes at home while she w…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:52 PM
-2

There was some safety seminar given in Canada where someone suggested that women not dress like sluts if they didn't want to be victimized. Instead of blaming the rapists, people continue to blame the victim. Even MRAs should note the same is said of men who are raped. No? Certainly, a woman walking down the street in skimpy clothes (looking like a slut, if you will) is not asking to be raped anymore than a random due walking down the street in a speedo is asking to be raped by a homophobic craz…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:42 PM
2

I'm calling BULLSHIT... I was in the Navy, and I was a SAHM to three kids and let me tell you for a fact being in the Navy was a lot easier than being a SAHM. Hell, I did a lot less cleaning in the Navy and we did a lot of cleaning!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:46 PM
0

I know a couple of stay-at-home dads. The attitudes have changed, but men still have to want to do it.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:29 PM
-9

You're right, this issue has nothing to do with children. Not at all...
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:28 PM
1

Honestly, aside from circumcision what rights do women have that men don't?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 03:01 AM
1

Sorry, but the law is that a person cannot give consent if they are drunk. Yeah, sure who is drunk and cannot give consent is up in the air if both are drunk... but all that does matter is who feels raped the next day or not.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:41 PM
1

A real man would not have sex with a drunk/drugged girl. A girl in that state cannot legally consent, even if she asks for it. It is rape in many states, but I reckon a man is rarely convicted in something like that.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:39 PM
1

You should have immediately called the police. I don't know what's up that hotline's ass, but I assume you just got a random bitch and if you called again and got someone else you may have got a different story. You should have gotten your phone back. I understand the fear in reporting it, it is no different than the women who don't report it because they are afraid of further abuse. This is not a freaking men's right issue. Stop making it that. Yes, the hotline has some issues, but you fear the…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 07:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter