TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LividGGPartisan Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by LividGGPartisan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Actually, what's better for you, taking the stairs or the escalator? Your doctor - fat shaming prick that he is - will suggest the stairs. Better for the heart, better for staying lean, better for regulating your bloodsugar. Of course, some people take the escalator anyway - they qualify for their education due to affirmative action and other such things, which is society allowing them to go through less hoops to arrive at the same location than other people. Unfortunately, it turns out that you…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:03 AM
3

At least while the children are quite young, I believe you're right. I think males are generally at higher risk, because a young man will eventually try to stand up to an abusive parent - a young woman will more than likely run away - in part since young women can more often find somebody who will try to take care of them and offer them shelter. Not that either solution is great, but you can see how there will be a gender difference.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:51 PM
5

Cassie said something smart when the sunrise woman mentioned a tragic story about a boy dying to domestic violence. This was part of the video which was taken down from Cassies facebook. Here's a link to her response: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0titJV8No4#t=9m45s The exchange starts at around 9m30s - I've timestamped the link to 9m 45 seconds.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:48 PM
–

I really like how she instantly picked up on the fact that the boy was a male victim of domestic violence. That's what you took from that story? (I'm incredulous!) Yes, lady. The victims gender matters to you, so it bloody well ought to matter that the victim was actually male. And to that, I will add: why in the bloody hell did his mother remain in a relationship with domestic violence and endanger him? I'd say the same thing about his father, except the father was probably beyond all reason an…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:01 PM
4

Lauren is pretty young. 22 or something. She's been internet active with her own face at least since she was 18 - but she's pretty much a kid. That only makes what she does more impressive, as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:45 AM
13

isn't that a good way to give an advantage to men, who don't mind reading all books?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:26 PM
3

That's not true - this is not how the word is commonly used. It is rarely used about discrimination that happens predominantly to men. You can't lecture people using the language. You have to change peoples minds, then the language will change by itself. This is exactly why it's unreasonable to say the feminism is an equality movement as the first definition - it is not. It is primarily a political movement favoring women.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:38 AM
–

It's not even likely she groomed the kid - she was a summer camp counselor! Reduce sentence to 2 years please. Yes, deter the behaviour. Don't ruin her life. Yes, this is what I would do for a male summer camp counselor who had consensual sex (statutory rape) with a 13 years old female student as well.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:22 AM
11

Hold up, hold up. I've seen this nonsense being bandied about before. First, gay and lesbian relationships make up a tiny minority, so getting accurate numbers is super hard. So first, don't just believe the numbers. Make sure you understand them. I haven't read the linked studies, but you really need to look at the sample size, and how the sample was acquired first. Let's not do a campus rape stats thing and buy poor stat numbers. If someones read it and checked it out, please reply and let the…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 07:17 PM
1

Yes, but somethings gotta give, and I don't touch up makeup or make idle conversation with my mates in the bathroom - or if I do, it is promptly requested that I be left to pretend I'm alone. This is my culture. I think I can integrate trannies into this just fine. But I cannot integrate the culture women already have into this, nor do I want to. Don't fucking put drunk giggling girls next to the urinals, and don't remove urinals, those things are awesome. No unisex. Result: One bathroom for men…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 10:12 PM
–

Could we please have a bathroom exclusively for women, and a bathroom for everybody but women? This would serve two purposes: Put some fucking boundaries before people. No matter who you are, there's a bathroom that's not for you. You'll never ever get to use both at your leisure. Tough shit. There's an entire culture around women having their own bathroom. Let's not fuck with that just because we're vindictive about having our culture fucked with to some extent. I don't need everybody in the wo…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 07:57 PM
1

I tend to believe that an accuser is one who attempts who initiates legal proceedings - regardless of whether they are a victim or not. I mention this specific circumstance, because I feel this circumstance is mitigating, but also because a confession from the accuser would prove this is what they attempted to do. What sentence I would want to give is probably going to be contingent on a weighting of punishment which is normal in my area of residence - Denmark. I say this, because we are 5.5 mil…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:08 PM
1

it may force somebody to commit false accusation
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:07 AM
7

Dude, you should consider if your friend is in a controlling relationship. Her behaviour appears to be pathological, very alike behaviour of people in abusive relationships. You guys may have to step in and suss out whether this is really what she wants.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:01 AM
3

I am so fucking happy to see this at the top. Minimum sentencing is one of the worst legal institutions you can have. It's a terrifying idea. You need to be able to be lenient - yes, also in cases of false accusations. Sometimes an underage person may be under severe pressure from a religious parent, and while that is no excuse for doing wrong, a prison sentence may not be the best option for such a person.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:14 AM
1

Well, abortions during the first trimester - the first 12 weeks or so - is what is allowed in a lot of jurisdictions. I can see lowering it to 6 weeks after finding out, which would typically be recognized as the first 6 weeks of pregnancy, but in some circumstances could be more. I generally think that's enough time to make up your mind, and it obviously minimizes any possibility of human suffering. However, I would have exceptions for underage mothers. For this period, I still would argue it w…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:10 PM
–

Hello. It seems that maybe you come from a country that does not natively speak english. May I ask what your native language is, or where you come from? I also want to tell you that I understand why you want to hold on to the feminist name. If you are comfortable stating that it is part of your identity, I do not want to take that away from you - but you should also know that a lot of people do not consider you to be feminist, with the type of opinions you express. A lot of people consider femin…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 01:07 PM
0

Not so fast. There could be variance within different fields - the fact that women in general are more risk averse and prefer more flexible work, does not imply that female stock brokers are more risk averse than male stock brokers... and it would also be almost impossible to find out without examining pretty much the entire field (unless there's a big difference, you need a large sample size, and there probably aren't many females in the field in the first place).
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:01 PM
–

I don't think such a thing is necessary to achieve substantive equality. Men may be over represented in senior positions, but that is not ipso facto an example of substantive inequality - that completely depends on the individual context. For instance, the male over representation among senior positions could be due to males seeking out specialized training outside of work at a higher rate than females. We don't actually know if, given the same behavior and qualifications by female employees, wo…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:15 PM
2

The worst part is, this objectively makes the world worse. A little girl got unfairly punished. Yay. Equality. Woo. It's very fucking hard to celebrate this win. Could we please just let kids be kids, no matter their gender?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:03 PM
2

Oh, and I should also add, it's not about penile cancers for boys. It's primarily about throat, mouth and rectal cancers, which men all get in higher numbers than women. Penile cancers are comparatively rare, and while they are probably often caused by HPV, they are not the area worth focusing on for men. Also, I didn't make it about men vs. women. I simply stated that there is evidence that women get prioritized over men by some healthcare systems in some areas. This is not a male-vs-female iss…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:22 PM
0

Also, circumcision? Really? I'm sure it would also reduce penile cancer and HIV if we just cut off the entire penis. Have you considered that perhaps there is a reduction because men who are circumcised often experience a stark decline in their sexlives in the 40'es, as they tend to lose feeling in their glans? That maybe this would be the reason that there is reduced risk? You have to weigh in all factors before you make public policy.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:08 PM
–

Uh, news flash, America is not the center of the world :-P There are many nations where the HPV vaccine is not given out for free to boys as part of otherwise free government health care, but where it is given out for free to girls.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:04 PM
–

I didn't say that HPV is more important to give for free to men than it is to give it for free to women. I said that there was a disparity in spite of a similar benefit - and there is. While consensus isn't established on cancers of the throat or cancers of the mouth, there is a clear correlation between those who have certain types of HPV, and those who get throat cancer or mouth cancer. The link is more clear with vaginal and ovarian cancer, because it appears that there are observable cell ch…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:45 PM
–

I don't think you know very much about what it's like to live without a prostate, or what a prostatectomy entails. I'm not going to lecture you about it, but I feel like you're really not empathizing.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 12:43 PM
–

Well that's still somewhat simplistic isn't it. Living without a prostate means you need all sorts of weird stuff to maintain the semblance of a normal sex life. Women who get breast amputation just need a prosthesis to maintain their outward appearance, so they're mostly fine. In other words, the survivors quality of life probably varies. Secondly, the numbers likely skew somewhat based on how it's treated by society. There's regular screenings of breast cancer and a relatively large movement s…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:56 AM
13

Let me run this by you real quick - the judge is arguing that those accused of committing sexual assault are not protected under Title IX, because the statute does not permit that result - but isn't that clearly completely insane ? ! ? Taken to it's logical extreme, since that is what the judge likes doing - suppose that a university does not allow female students. This is illegal under Title IX. Suppose, instead, that the university accuses any female student applicant of having committed rape.…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:36 PM
7

You know, assuming this is real, that guy done goofed. On the other hand, a post like this hits all the right notes to get reddit inflamed. False rape accusation, father son drama, and even a well written reddit post on TIFU. Which, that's interesting isn't it. Regardless of whether or not this is real, when the case is open and shut like this, reddit does get angry. It does get inflamed. There's still some core of moral dignity going on.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:51 PM
1

I don't think it needed to be a professional setting. I think this interview serves the purpose for which it was made absolutely fine.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:09 PM
4

Honestly, none of this is sexist. It's just two girls playfully pretending to hit on a guy....and it's completely fine. Everybody is enjoying themselves. The idea of making everything that happens in public 'professional' is incredibly dreary to me. That's why it's such a shame that the cricket reporter was such a bad sport about everything... it really sets everything back every time just one such incident pops up.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:16 PM
1

Well that's what I would do. "ok ok, I didn't want to say this before because it's really embaressing...but I guess now I have to let out the truth...she put a finger in the stinker." I highly recommend this course of action.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 02:22 PM
2

actually, it's really simple. College age men just need to insist on a pinky in his bum before they get naughty. Just for a second. Creates a scenario of mutually assured destruction.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:39 AM
1

Alright. Contestants for who wants to be a millionaire then. I bet you none get to that part of the audience box if they can't speak english. That's an area where they are denied physical entry due to the language that they don't speak.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:13 PM
7

I live here. It's pretty decent. Not everything is great, but doing well in school and doing well socially are not linked very hard, and we have very little poverty overall. Also, excellent conditions for uneducated workers and tradesmen, which predominantly affects men. I think a part of the reason is that Denmark is very urban, which means everybody participates in the political debate to some extent; sweden is incredibly rural by comparison, and that means there's a much larger seperation bet…
/r/MensRights24/01/16 03:00 PM
1

I would imagine that participants in jeopardy need to speak english?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:04 PM
1

lol no - and besides, what kind of argument even is that? You don't think I can convince a court of it? Look, this is a part of society that makes people uncomfortable, but if it were skills, everybody would be fine with it. Newspapers print articles from skilled writers, they don't print articles from unskilled writers. Clubs let attractive patrons in, they don't let unattractive patrons in. It's the same damn deal, except this time, it's based on attractiveness. And no. You can't necessarily c…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:36 PM
1

what are you talking about? This is not discrimination based on race. That's when you don't sell to people based on race. This is when you don't let people into your club based on how attractive the bouncer finds them. It's a completely different thing. One, there is a clear, one-way relationship. All the store wants is money. In the second one, the life-blood of the business is whether or not you're attractive. This is like complaining that you can't make a dating application on a website becau…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:30 PM
1

It is not a ban on black women, it is a ban on people who are unattractive, but that does indeed disproportionately affect certain minority groups, and black women is one of those groups. The reason this is ok, is because entering a nightclub is a quid pro quo. You are given entrance based on how attractive you are, because some night club owners desperately need attractive clientele. That is their entire business model. They sell stuff that's really cheap at a lot of money, and they can only do…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:02 AM
1

isn't it possible that your undergrad program was full of people who didn't care about gender ratio's in the first place, then? Like, it's fine that you have a good grasp of the opinions of your peers, but you have to take into account whether or not your sample is representative. It seems to me that those who care about gender ratios will have chosen a different prestigious school, if one were available to them.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:55 PM
-1

They might have other reasons, but I think we should charge, in public, that they did it due to racism. Give the social justice warriors some of their own medicine and make them confused as all hell.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:17 AM
1

Nightclubs in Denmark (and the world, I presume) are notorious for their discrimination across the board - but it's mostly an SJW issue. Don't be fooled - this is not actually a problem for anybody. Allow me to lay it out for you: The bouncer at an exclusive nightclub will only let in anybody he thinks is attractive. He's very, very good at it - he rates men and women from 1 to 10 all night, 3 nights a week. Such a nightclub has a rating. Maybe it's 6, maybe it's 7, maybe it's even 8. You only g…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:27 AM
1

like, sorry for the cross examination, I'm just trying to assess the full context of your experiences.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:59 AM
1

alright, well, how was the gender ratio at your specific school?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 08:20 AM
2

Are you or have you been a grad student at an ivy league university? Do you personally know anyone who is or has been a grad student?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:17 AM
1

Well, your experiences may not reflect the entirety of the student body - in particular, it may not reflect the very top. I would presume that the goal of the colleges, in addition to getting money from tuition fees, is to gain prestigious alumni. Presumably, only the best of the student body are offered positions in the graduate school in the ivy league colleges - from my research, it looks to be about 5% of those who get an undergraduate degree, who get to go on to graduate school. My hypothes…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 10:02 PM
1

http://time.com/money/4072951/college-gender-ratios-dating-hook-up-culture/ So your contention is that, when women describe unhappiness with a 60-75% gender ratio, that's only something they discover after they go there? Or is it that those women do not care about their social happiness when attending different schools, and so select schools based on other criteria? Because I don't think you can accept that lopsided gender ratios impact social life tremendously, without picking one of those two …
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:07 PM
1

http://time.com/money/4072951/college-gender-ratios-dating-hook-up-culture/ What do you think of this article?
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:34 PM
1

Teenagers who haven't had much. I do agree with you.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:26 PM
1

That's a fair point. "see, this is what happens when we let people run amok with quotas" I can get behind that. As I say, as an observation, it works. But I'm not convinced it'll affect the US in the long run, or even most of the men 'it happens to' in the long run. I just looked over the admission rates into ivy league grad school. Abysmally low numbers. It's a tiny percentage who go on. For that reason, I have a hunch that the universities take in the men that they want, and then they pad the …
/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:23 AM
2

Actually, I'll go ahead and qualify why I think prioritizing issues is important: We need to know what issues to lead with. Take the feminist issue of manspreading, or the feminist issue of airconditioning being too high. Can we all agree that feminism would have stood stronger had those issues been de-prioritized? Further, some issues are more important in terms of getting solutions. I'm here to fix shit for men who have it really bad. I'm here because, mostly, of compassion. That compassion al…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:29 PM
3

You're right. Big tent. I get it. It's definitely an issue that will be an MRA issue at some point, if it persists, and it's great to observe that it exists, but I think we should be honest that it's not at the top of the list.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:16 PM
6

Well, ok so I have a few comments on this. The first is that these are for-profit Universities. That means they want to draw in the best students. You might reasonably argue that these institutions are the most prestigious ones, and that applicants will come running anyway - not entirely true. So long as I come from a good private college, it'll help me get a job and while I'm there I can make some good connections. I don't have to attend MIT, UVA will be just fine, and that's where I will go if…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:58 PM
11

this guy. This guy right here. Gold star for this man.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:07 PM
0

Alright fair enough - but there are byproducts to criminalizing it using age of consent. Even if you see it as a strict ban on adults having sex with teenagers, that doesn't mean this is the only effect. There's a lot of examples of teenagers being punished due to a small age difference, sometimes as little as a single year, in spite being sexually active for 2-3 years while neither was over the age of consent. This will necessarily create a chilling effect on the subject. You can't just crimina…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 08:36 AM
0

Greenland is an excellent example, since it illustrates that it's not just about the law, you are quite right - that's because Greenland is actually danish in terms of most of its laws. It's about a culture of prohibition vs. a culture of acceptance. In parts of the western world, there is massive sexual prohibition of teenagers, that reaches far beyond the point where most adolescents wish to become sexually active. This leads to secrecy and isolation. Age of consent laws are one contributor to…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:17 AM
0

Actually, there's another argument beyond the moral one: Prohibiting teenagers from having sex doesn't prevent it - it just makes it happen in secret. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_teenage_pregnancy#/media/File:Teenage_birth_rate_per_1000_women_15%E2%80%9319,_2000-09.svg See this? Denmark is in the incredibly low category. The US is...well, you can see for yourself. Another fun fact - legal age limit on buying alcohol here? Also 15. You'd think with all of these legal boozing teena…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:41 PM
1

In Denmark, age of consent is 15. What she did would have been legal here, unless she abused him or you could otherwise argue that there was a significant power differential at play in the arrangement...which, if she wasn't grading his stuff, I don't think you could argue. What do you all think about the danish laws? Bear in mind, the laws go both ways (and are applied evenly). Personally, I tend to think that unless a person is developmentally stunted, 15 is old enough that the government doesn…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 12:48 PM
32

The whole NOW thing... These people are insane. You absolutely have to figure out how this happened, and examine the type of shenanigans that go on with false accusations. If you don't do this, you're not able to build a model for the criminals who abuse the justice system for personal gain or out of vindictive tendencies. If you don't have such a model, police and campus investigators (the latter which should not even exist) will be fumbling in the dark. It is much more likely that they will di…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:56 AM
1

you're welcome :-) I enjoyed writing it out. And yeah, it's pretty much an entire teatrice against the oppression olympics.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:41 PM
1

Well, I'm not saying you're wrong about any of your data points, and I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong (I tend to agree with it, but I find it far too simple) - but I contend that it is not reasonable to consider your conclusion universal. Right now, it looks like you're looking at the problem through a lens of outcomes and legislation, with a distinct focus towards those getting the short end of the stick. That's ok too - but you're trying to derive an objective answer, and (by implicatio…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:40 PM
5

Well, you're very welcome, and I want to say that I think you have the right mindset. I was personally scared of delving into the MRM, due to a relatively intuitive reasoning I also had for feminism - if the movements themselves were polarizing enough that people would act crazy (in the case of feminism), or be reviled (in the case of the MRM), then might their arguments not also affect me? That's why, when I first started picking through things, I felt like I had to mentally cocoon myself in pr…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 03:04 AM
30

A word of caution - feminism is an incredibly broad and varied community, full of people of all creeds, as is the MRM. As such, you are likely to see (legitimate) criticism of members of the MRM that makes those members out to be terrible. You are also likely to see criticism that goes further, and tries to paint the entire movement with the same brush. A similar thing happens in the other direction as well. Individual feminists come under criticism for legitimate reasons - and the feminist move…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:55 PM
3

I think it's really important that you realize that you have been the victim of a crime. That feeling like absolute shit? That's not indignation at the accusation. That's the feeling of shame and self-loathing that accompanies being a victim. You will likely feel guilty, too. This is completely normal. Unfortunately, being a victim is not an easy lot - especially not for a young man. It is no different to having the snot beaten out of you in a fight - well, except that on this one, it is mainly …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 03:43 AM
1

Actually, I did want to say one more thing. I'm from Denmark, and to a very limited extent, our laws recognizes forms of subtle coercion as part of statutory rape laws, which is basically what you're talking about. Here, it's known as the 'teacher paragraph', which holds that in relationships where there is a very significant power differential, it's possible to commit statutory rape even against adults. In practice, the law hasn't been tested much, however - age of consent here is a fairly reas…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:06 PM
1

"So their consent was based on your lies, and that's somehow their fault?" Well clearly their cries of 'yes yes' were deceptive. They didn't really mean them; what they really meant was 'yes, but only if you didn't lie about something in some other situation... keep going, but only if you didn't lie to me about how many kids you have'. This distinction is, completely on it's own, a deception. It's not a self-deception or ignorance; you don't get to plead ignorance of the possibility that somebod…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:32 PM
2

As an addendum: I'm not suggesting that this means that lies to people who enter into personal relationships with you could not be lawfully regulated. They could be - but I think that's a terrible idea for other reasons. But if we're going to have a law like that, don't call it rape. It's not the same damn thing. Just isn't. The crime is much more aptly described as sexual seduction by deception.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:39 PM
2

I don't mean this personally, but your point of view is one of lunacy. You raise one problem yourself, with women and children - but the concept itself is an inherent contradiction. For instance, I do not consent to be a rapist. That is, I only consent to have sex with people, who consent to have sex with me. The moment they no longer consent to have sex with me, I no longer consent to have sex with them. Seems simple enough - anybody reasonable would completely agree with this sentiment. If I m…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 11:30 PM
3

I'm speaking in the ethical sense, not the legal sense. Rape is punishment for violating somebody's right to privacy and bodily integrity; you can't exploit these rights, to give you the ability to punish others harsher for strictly less terrible crimes.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:47 PM
19

Wow. 8 years. What a farcical miscarriage of justice. The idea that you can make consent constituent upon outside factors is ludicrous. Consent is something you give to have sex - sex as it is carried out, and sex in the way it is carried out. It can obviously be withdrawn at any time, and must be adhered to in short order - but you get sex, and your partner gets sex, and that's the end of it. That is all consent matters to. Refusing to pay a prostitute after sex does not make your guilty of rap…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:58 PM
1

Perhaps I'm mistaken, but are you sure the place you searched keeps a record of everything on reddit? Further, a lot of subreddits will delete subjects of discussion if they know the community is going to get into a lot of fights over it. It's a kind of ecco chamber effect imposed upon entire communities.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:13 PM
6

I don't think you realize how few normies actually know what /r/theredpill even is. This movie is for normies.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:24 PM
2

Hold on, just one brief moment. This is a girl getting her rocks off to a guy completely surrendering all power in the bedroom to the woman, but while still acting as though he is the one taking the initiative. He's worked out this is a great way to woo her. Oh how clever him. Or is he? How did he realize that her fixation on consent is innately sexual to her? That her crusade for ending rape was actually also tied to a specific sexual turn on? Because from where I'm sitting, all of these campus…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:15 PM
1

hey man, they apparently lock it in order to preserve a semblance of order. People generally go there to get other peoples off the cuff responses - and not generally to engage in longwinded debate. That's not as dumb as it might sound at first - it cultivates an atmosphere where the valued members of the community are those who are good at expressing their immediate reactions, not the ones who are good at arguing. That's actually very useful; it gives you a great idea of what sort of reaction yo…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:42 PM
1

Aaand the thread is locked. I have no idea why. Maybe it was too hot?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:02 PM
10

Hey, OP from the other subreddit. I don't know that this is really a mens rights issue, but I obviously appreciate any input I can get, pretty mutch no matter the source. That said, this really comes down to emotions more so than arguments, as the sticking point is this idea of fairness.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:24 AM
8

My bodyweight is litterally double her bodyweight. I haven't done the math in terms of calories but I really do eat a lot.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter