TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LivingDaylight Archive

View 2 posts and 66 comments by LivingDaylight on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Could you elaborate a bit on the yes-yes relationship? Obviously at some point a man would have to "have enough." How does one know when that point has been reached?
/r/seduction19/04/12 12:04 PM
1

I've had many female friends that were platonic. Some attractive, some not. Just because I could have sex with them doesn't mean I am constantly striving to.
/r/seduction29/02/12 07:03 PM
1

Amusing, but I disagree.
/r/seduction29/02/12 06:16 PM
8

Everyone fucks up, the key is to learn from it and move on. You did well, accept it as a good learning experience and try again.
/r/seduction22/02/12 03:37 PM
3

It's hard to describe why it's awkward...I would say breaking the touch barrier in that manner (you requesting her adjust the bracelet) is generally awkward. Anything can word with the right attitude I suppose, but I'm not sure you have that developed yet.
/r/seduction22/02/12 03:18 PM
9

When you got her to adjust your bracelet that was a little awkward, but you could have made up for it by following up immediately, depending on a whole lot of factors. Once you failed to open her successfully you probably became the awkward guy in her eyes so continuing to hit on her was counter-productive at best. The hardest part is getting out there and doing it though, just keep practising and you'll get it.
/r/seduction22/02/12 02:34 PM
19

Congrats on getting out of your comfort zone. Maybe not the greatest technique, but that's not important. What's important is you are shedding your fear of rejection and getting an early start at it. Well done, sir.
/r/seduction22/02/12 02:22 PM
2

I've been to a few meetings and I plan to become a permanent member. The people there other than the executive, at least in my club, are a lot more awkward that I would have thought. They are obviously there to improve themselves. I think it's good because it forces you out of your comfort zone. You will have to say at least a short speech at every meeting, and they give lots of tips on public speaking. It will definitely help build confidence, but nothing seduction-specific. I'm in a LTR anyway…
/r/seduction17/02/12 04:06 PM
1

I was only looking at featured and stand corrected.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:29 PM
-3

Motorcycle magazines don't have pictures of cars in them? Does't that support my point? They are talking about abuse in general, not men's vs. women's issues. At least not in this specific article. Media represents men as aggressors, women as victims, even feminists can agree on that. How does that relate to this discussion?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:01 PM
2

I bet if you posted the exact same article on a men's right blog the reverse would happen. Edit: I did a ctrl+f for the words "father" and "boyfriend" and there were no hits. Way to make stuff up to support your claim. I was quite wrong about this.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:57 PM
-4

If the reverse happened no one here would care.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:33 PM
13

I like how they fail to mention that the majority of these child abuse cases come from mothers, usually single mothers. I don't really see how that would have added to the article, and there is no man-hating or man-blaming language in there at all. Overall I'd say it's reasonable.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:13 PM
6

Because I was working.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:19 PM
13

I am 100% ok with public breastfeeding. Your language does make you come across like a misogynist in that post, by the way. Things like: seeing a snotty young-ling grasping on to the desiccated mams of some cow. Really just makes you seem like a woman-hating prick.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:05 PM
4

Father here. Fuck you. It took my spouse 30 minutes to fill a bottle half full with a high end pump while managing having her body seriously altered by birth and taking care of a screaming infant. And you have the balls to call her "too lazy & undisciplined"? FUCK YOU
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:02 PM
5

Ah I see your point.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 01:29 PM
28

In those two examples no one was physically hurt. The girls' "prank" put the boys in hospital and it was clearly their intent to harm them. Big difference IMO. The girls' behaviour was clearly criminal.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 01:11 PM
2

Not if they do something thoughtful. If they do something thoughtful and they are still considered cheap deadbeats they need to find a new girlfriend.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:09 AM
9

I have a hard time caring about "problems" that are only an issue to the men making the actual decisions/purchases. If those men want to spend 2x what their spouses do who are we to judge?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:40 PM
3

That is indeed BS.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:21 PM
3

Are there different standards? Link?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:11 PM
1

Who said anything about a lower standard of fitness?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:00 PM
0

The majority of men can't pass the fitness standards either.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:32 PM
1

They don't have any psychological tests?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 10:31 AM
6

I have no problem with this. If women can pass all the same tests as men and are qualified to do the job than they should be able to go to the front lines.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:05 AM
1

You say strong people shouldn't be the first to get in lifeboats No, I said that my willingness to give up my seat for someone weaker than me is not because I am disposable, but because I am more likely to survive. I don't think there should be an obligation for strong people to give up their seats.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 11:07 AM
1

I'm not talking about men and women as a class. I am talking about strong people and weak people (to form a binary where none exists). I work out 4 times per week, have a black belt and used to be a lifeguard, so I am more capable of swimming than probably 90% of people. The fact that I am a man is irrelevant, my greater likelihood of surviving the swim is the important factor here.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:30 AM
2

That is your own choice, which I support, but it isn't consistent with my morals.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:28 AM
1

"Helping" in a lifeboat situation means voluntarily dying No it doesn't. As a strong male I have options available to me that a weaker person does not. I'm certainly accepting a higher risk, that's true. I agree that it is not "disgusting" to not do that however, and the expectation that men will lay down their lives for women just because they are men is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 11:41 AM
2

Thanks for your insightful comment.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 06:08 PM
10

Care to debate my specific points instead of swearing at me?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 06:05 PM
0

Doing that would create chaos and reduce the total number of people who survive. That is inconsistent with my morals.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:57 PM
4

So what would you do? Lead a revolt against the Titanic crew to allow the men to survive? Did you miss the part where I said I wouldn't give the old lady the lifeboat if it meant certain death for me?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:43 PM
1

No, no it won't. All it will do is make sure you are last to leave. Given what we know now, yes. But the people on the boat after it went aground on the shoal didn't know it would still be there days later. What if this was the Titanic, where you would die of hypothermia within minutes? I would get in the line up. If "women and children first" were being enforced I would accept that. Even though I believe it is wrong, causing a scene will not maximize the number of people saved. Regardless, in t…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:24 PM
7

Because my doing it will maximize the chances that all of us will survive. If me (very fit 24 year old who is a strong swimmer) and an old lady were on the boat, I'd let her go first because I have a high probability of surviving the swim to shore. That's what I like to think anyway. There is no way to know what I would actually do in a life or death situation.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:00 PM
10

I don't help someone weaker than me because of a theoretical agreement, I do it because it's the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 04:40 PM
1

Can you provide a little context? I'm at work and don't want to click the link.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 01:33 PM
45

I agree with your point. In the past, it was commonly accepted that women were weaker and generally less competent than men, making men obligated to "take care" of them. The feminist movement has changed that, and as a result I would not give my place to a woman and allow my spouse and child to go fatherless. That said, pushing to the front is totally unacceptable. I still believe that the strong should help the weak, ignoring their respective sexes.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:01 PM
2

I blame the fools who buy them drinks, not the women. If I could get free drinks for nothing in return I would do it too.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 02:56 PM
3

It would be nice to get a hold of that thesis.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 05:31 PM
4

He totally lost credibility for me when he started ranting about abortion at the end. What does that have to do with chivalry?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 02:06 PM
5

I wonder if he is still part of the feminist club. Something tells me he won't get elected again.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 01:28 PM
2

Depends on the situation. If I had been an important part of the child's life that long and I loved him/her I would probably want to continue that relationship because I would love him/her. If I rarely saw the kid and didn't feel a deep connection I would not want to continue paying ~1/3 of my income to support them because there would be no biological or emotional connection. Regardless, we are discussing whether the man should be legally required to pay. Can you name any other examples in comm…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:49 AM
6

It's insane that this is even up for debate. So he happened to have sex with her at around the same time as at least one other man, how does that obligate him to 18 years of paying ~ 1/3 of his salary to her?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:07 AM
1

Is there a specific one about sexual violence against children? I reviewed those and failed to find a single specific conclusive graph or table.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:14 PM
1

Oops. I can't edit that so I'll just make a new one and delete this one.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:46 PM
5

Publicizing your views will do more damage to our movement than you understand. The fewer fringe lunatics there are the better we will be able to get our message across.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:37 PM
5

You honestly believe that the vast majority of society thinks women are big children? You could have fooled me. Over 1/2 the population is female, there are enough females in high-profile positions to show that the public is willing to vote for them. I believe that discounting any individual's skill or merit based on their belonging to a particular group is wrong - full stop. Generalizing about women like that is no better than feminists saying bullshit like "men are the cause of all the world's…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:35 PM
11

“Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted, in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word.” Good riddance to anyone who agrees with that.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:25 PM
2

Even if this were accurate, this type of portrayal of it is not an effective way to get our point across.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:20 PM
1

How is this helpful?
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:16 PM
8

In my experience the whole "nice guy" phenomenon is due to the difference between what women say they want in a mate and what they actually want. They say they want a guy to hold the door, call them beautiful, buy them things, etc., but what they really want is an unapologetically masculine man who is confident and sure of himself. Obviously I'm overgeneralising here but that is the gist of it. What women say they want is constantly portrayed in movies and literature because the fantasy appeals …
/r/MensRights22/12/11 03:28 PM
14

I applaud her. It takes guts to write something like that.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:03 PM
3

Seems like a fair deal to me.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:25 PM
6

Agreed. If a guy wants to barter his sperm who are we to say it is wrong? It's his sperm. He could go trade it for a big mac for all I care.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:15 PM
5

How does this result in "male reductionism?"
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:55 PM
24

This does not reflect my experience in woman's studies at all. I grew up with a feminist mother (whose teachings I began discounting fairly early thankfully), and I refused to believe that an institution like a university could spew such bigotry and foolishness. So, I enrolled in a single woman's studies course as an elective to my main program because I wanted to know the truth about it, rather than my mother's bitter view on the matter. As it turns out, woman's studies was just as bad as my mo…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 02:52 PM
1

The fact that your later comments have been downvoted speaks volumes about this subreddit. Well done, gents.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:28 PM
2

Sorry, but the guy is a fool for doing this - he's not thinking with his brain. Back when I was dating, if a girl doesn't put out by date 3-4 I'm out, and I don't plan expensive first dates anyway. My current spouse (living together for almost 4 years) bought me a drink on our first date.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 12:33 PM
2

I believe this is a chicken:egg type scenario. These games are targeted mainly at men, who (like myself) enjoy the female characters this way. it doesn't mean I think that reality should reflect this. If there were a larger market for female gamers I think its likely that it would change, but I don't see that happening for a long time. Disclaimer: I only read the first page because the site is now offline.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:23 PM
5

I know a huge number of mothers that are on anti-depressants. Do you have kids and other parents friends with whom you would discuss such things?
/r/MensRights24/11/11 01:03 PM
1

Free in Canada :).
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:25 PM
4

Seems like it would be sexual harassment to me.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 11:16 AM
11

If this isn't well into the negatives later today I am quitting this subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:02 PM
17

I had a crazy feminist mother as well. She wasn't nearly as bad as yours, and luckily I was able to break out of it and start arguing with her at a young age. The inequality was evident to me when I had to wash the dishes because I could and it wasn't my sisters job, yet I got no extra credit for doing the things that she wasn't "strong enough" to do like shovel the driveway. Such BS that makes me fume to this day. I actually took a woman's studies course in university to see if the kind of BS s…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter