Living_Ad_2141 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Men wouldn't complain about "modern women" or feminism if both sexes were equally attracted to each other Yeah but she if isn’t interested she isn’t interested right? Its not about fair or even every woman finding a mate. You’re competing with her being single.	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/25 03:21 AM
3	Men wouldn't complain about "modern women" or feminism if both sexes were equally attracted to each other It’s not like women aren’t blowing past red flags anyway. Women are picky because they believe they need to find the one guy that is good enough in other areas to makeup for being a turd in the area of stepping up at home and with kids. So if you don’t even look average and gave everything else going for you, you’re screwed. Even if you are average looking, if you are a loner or surround yourself with immature or underachiever male friends, or are an under achiever yourself, or are lazy in terms…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/12/25 08:58 PM
–	Women define being single as not in an official relationship, men define being single as not sexually active. This leads to an inherent lack of understanding. Since when is being single considered generally equivalent to being not sexually active?	/r/PurplePillDebate	19/06/23 08:56 PM
1	American women have the worst reputation for relationships / marriage in the entire world. This is not (so much) the case for American men. I think you have to understand that there you see people escaping the western society to some extent. Sexism and other isms are still rampant in the states, have been for a while, and over the years the face of it has changed from traditional sexism to neo-misogyny where men instead of treating women as people they want to lock into a traditional marriage, treat women as sexual objects they either hook up with casually or love bomb or shower with material gifts for a few weeks can (even are obli…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/06/23 08:08 PM
1	Am I right to be pissed? Ideally, you would be informed of the boyfriend before he meets your kids and meet the boyfriend soon after, but her doing this instead not the worst thing that could have happened. Still, she (and he) should be willing to let you meet him soon.	/r/Divorce_Men	01/06/23 03:42 PM
1	Everyone has experienced this type foulmouthed answers from a feminist when you talk about men's problem. I’ve already defined it above. And the statement was an example (hypothetical) argument, not my own.	/r/MensRights	31/05/23 12:24 PM
2	Female accountability? non-existent. Travis Rudolph's case. I do not know this case too well, so this is not a claim of any facts in that case, but there could be an important reason why a co conspirator or witness who committed a serious crime themselves might not be charged. Is she a cooperating witness? That’s often a get out of jail card (or at least reduced charge/sentence) in a murder case. Also, if someone assaults you then flees, then you shoot them, that’s still murder. It sounds like 5 people should go to jail, but often the state (I.e., the st…	/r/MensRights	31/05/23 01:44 AM
1	Everyone has experienced this type foulmouthed answers from a feminist when you talk about men's problem. No. Patriarchy leads to wealth inequality is a hypothesis. Wealth inequality is an abstraction of various people having more wealth than various others. Wealth is an abstraction of owning things. Things is a generalization of pots, pans, spacecraft, nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons is a generalization of kinds of nuclear weapons, which is a generalization of individual nuclear weapons. Patriarchy is a generalization of sexism, gender norms. Gender is a generalization of various gender traits. Se…	/r/MensRights	31/05/23 12:09 AM
1	Everyone has experienced this type foulmouthed answers from a feminist when you talk about men's problem. It’s not a hypothesis, as I’ve already said, other than of it being a consistent, meaningful, or useful generalization (and abstraction) of more finite categories or generalizations or actions.	/r/MensRights	30/05/23 11:12 PM
1	Noticed something interesting in "Ant-Man' movie Or that’s what he decided to pay…	/r/MensRights	30/05/23 10:08 PM
0	Everyone has experienced this type foulmouthed answers from a feminist when you talk about men's problem. I do not know why you are bringing logical positivism into this. I think Karl Popper would not claim that “patriarchy” is a non-falsifiable hypothesis or theory. It is a generalization. It is a gross generalization perhaps, but it is a somewhat useful generalization. It is not even making a claim though, other than to itself being defined as it is defined. In any event I defined the term as I used it, up front. So does the sentence “the system of division of labor, authority, etc., under which p…	/r/MensRights	30/05/23 08:37 PM
0	Everyone has experienced this type foulmouthed answers from a feminist when you talk about men's problem. Patriarchy is the system of division of labor, authority, etc., under which people have lived for a long time. It is not and should not merely be a cudgel to beat innocent men over the head with. No one interested in equality and the rights of both sexed being respected should defend patriarchy. Nor should anyone claim it does not matter or does not exist. Feminists too often only focus on the things they would like to change which benefit women, supposedly. This often includes more women in mal…	/r/MensRights	30/05/23 06:40 PM
1	Men often don’t understand that physical attraction is not optional I’m amazed sometimes at the 1s and 2s women (women with a lot to offer) will go for if he is “relationship material” for the most part, in all other ways, and if she’s like not in her teens or early 20s Same for a lot of guys looking to hook up and never see women again or looking for a right now kind of girl. I know it’s a stereotype I’m not recommending it. I hate that it seems well enough to be true.	/r/PurplePillDebate	18/05/23 11:20 PM
1	How does one preserve a relationship with an infant? Being a weekend dad is not nothing. It’s about being engaged, not bickering over hours per week. Nobody should mind their ex coming by once a twice a week for dinner, provided he not been abusive and there has been sone space for healing. I wish people would be adults and not argue over the last dime if the last hour per week of time with the kids (which many don’t really want that badly,they just want the other parent to be denied. The child can use a good second parent and to above all needs t…	/r/Divorce_Men	18/05/23 05:46 PM
11	Child Support is 52.54% of my paycheck If you can prove a 25% or greater reduction in your income you can get a reduction going forward, but vie will not change back pay. Her income or babysitter expenses usually do not matter.	/r/MensRights	17/05/23 04:53 AM
1	Married for 4 days before she asked for divorce. I’m getting real bipolar vibes here. How on earth did this argument that turned into separation actually start?	/r/Divorce_Men	16/05/23 07:03 PM
1	Married for 4 days before she asked for divorce. What financial settlement? How much you save between honeymoon and divorce? She should be asking for $20000 a month in spousal support and refusing to bring the divorce proceedings to an end.	/r/Divorce_Men	16/05/23 07:01 PM
1	As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies. I have a degree in poly sci and economics and a masters in financial economics, so I was just trying to be brief. Once there was just law history philosophy theology and philology. Economics and political science have previously been rolled into law, history, and (moral) philosophy before being considered majors (or degrees) of their own.	/r/MensRights	16/05/23 03:29 AM
1	As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies. One would think studying books and ideas on gender patriarchal traditions in society and things like gender discrimination, for example, need not he scientific, since these are just ideas and observations just like philosophy literature and social criticism in general, and that the history of the social movements vis a vis women and gender are in face as scientific as history in general.	/r/MensRights	16/05/23 03:23 AM
-2	As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies. So should only teach sociology, history, psychology, literature, and philosophy? Is that better? Maybe they should instead have a genetic social sciences undergrad, with imbedded biology, logic, statistics, sociology, history, political science, psychology, and philosophy of science core, and generic philosophy, literature, comparative religion, and art history majors, but have the same classes available as in major electives or general electives. Or are you saying women’s studies classes just s…	/r/MensRights	15/05/23 03:44 PM
-3	As an academic, I wish more people would be aware that the 60% majority of women in academia is entirely coming from adding to universities political departments and calling them "research departments" - gender studies, women's studies, sexuality studies. So should only teach sociology, history, psychology, literature, and philosophy? Is that better? Maybe they should get rid of the social sciences and humanities altogether since you can’t get a job out of undergrad with them and instead have a genetic social sciences undergrad, with imbedded biology, logic, statistics, and philosophy of science minors and generic philosophy, literature, comparative religion, and art history majors, but have the same classes available as in major or general elect…	/r/MensRights	15/05/23 03:43 PM
1	Money during/after divorce It depends on the state what that money is, but it is no longer non-marital property or non-community property if you have ever co-mingled it with marital property, like investing it in improvements on a house (especially a house you both have lived in for a long time, or one with both your names on the deed or mortgage), depositing it in a joint account, etc. Best to keep it by itself in a cash back account with only your own name on the account where interest and fees are certain and can be re…	/r/Divorce_Men	27/10/22 03:19 PM
4	My girlfriend told me that men ruin women all the time Men or women with a history of being abused or abusers or with bad childhoods sometimes blame the stable considerate and co-dependent non abusive women or men in their lives for everything they imagine is wrong. They sometimes have a need to be the controlling domineering abusive or complaining one in the relationship to feel in control, or because the dynamic is one of co-dependency and that is really not what she wants deep down. Being in a relationship where you can mistreat the other person …	/r/MensRights	17/04/22 08:02 PM