TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Llaine Archive

View 0 posts and 43 comments by Llaine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

BLM is nothing but a bunch of SJWs hyped up on bad statistics. An examination of the figures show that their claims, e.g. of an epidemic of police racism against back people, do not stand up to scrutiny. Any rational person would naturally oppose such nonsense. Here I'm met with the same exasperation that Thomas was. To insist that the violence black people face is false is so mind boggling that I can't respond in any measured way. You've already dismissed the statistics out of hand. I can only …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:38 AM
1

Please name a feminist-controlled forum anywhere on the Internet which does not ban anyone who expresses dissent with feminist dogma. I'm not going to even try here because I don't participate in feminist forums. But your point is moot because any circlejerk will ban outside opinions. See: the donald and most other right wing havens on this site. Yes, I know this goes for lefty subreddits too, and they're just as shit. Point is it's a human thing, not a feminist thing. Please name a university f…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:32 AM
1

what the fuck is the big deal about making it out that Sargon's audience were rowdy? Look at it this way: if people were yelling "shitlord" and "broflake" constantly at Carl, that'd be annoying, yes? he tried to call MRA's terrorists for fuck's sake What? When? You're grasping at straws and really this is just you trying to find an excuse to explain why Thomas Smith did so badly and you're clinging to this "Oh it was Sargon's audience" idea Hit me with a cohesive argument and I'll address it. Th…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:28 AM
1

Carl explicitly states that he supports equality of opportunity, and for everyone to have the greatest possible freedom in how they choose to live their lives. He has to say that. No rational human would ever say otherwise. But his actions are in direct contrast, as are many of his views. He's anti-BLM, anti-harassment (being a harasser himself), anti any social policy aimed at supporting the less fortunate. You can't be for equality but anti-everything that works to promote it. You're saying th…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:23 AM
1

Then it's not really a properly confirmed source is it? Well, short of the organisers having done something.. Also, Sargon has an audience that is made up of quite a variety of people, so to try and claim they're all a bunch of sychophants and it was just his supporters going after Thomas Smith is completely wrong. Look at it this way: the audience was constantly jeering and shouting stupid shit like "kekistan". None of Thomas' supporters did similarly.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:21 AM
1

Source? It's not a great one, but someone in participation on Facebook (?) wrote about the debacle. They claimed from their participation and soft polling of the audience that it was somewhere close to 50:50, that it wasn't purely Carl supporters. Just that Thomas' supporters didn't really yell or anything, but you can clearly hear some claps around the start during the 'I wouldn't even rape you' argument that were in Thomas' favour. I'm afraid it's been completely true in a lot of cases with re…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:38 AM
1

Oh fuck off lol you're just being a Thomas Smith apologist, as Sargon had said in his video after, you guys had every opportunity to show up, but you didn't, you could have supported a bi-partisan event but barely any of Thomas Smith's fanbois showed up. The audience was apparently close to 50:50. It's just that Thomas' supporters didn't jeer and yell like the manchildren of the opposition. And I'm not in the US :) It just shows when it comes to the real world they're full of shit as always. Whe…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:28 AM
1

Are you actually defending that? By agreeing with Thomas Smith you're literally saying that freedom is the status quo and is a bad thing. Yeah, but that's not what I understood when he said it. I obviously can't speak for him, and it's an example of his being flustered by Carl and the (frankly) trash audience. Carl purports to support freedom. His version of freedom is really just pro-white males, which has been the status quo for hundreds of years and largely remains the status quo. That would …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:22 AM
1

Thomas is neither anti-free speech or anti-capitalist.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:58 AM
1

I don't think Thomas did a bad job here, he simply did badly at engaging someone like Carl. Carl isn't someone you can argue with on a factual/logical basis without a moderator intervening. Thomas would begin with a question and Carl would regularly retort by strawmanning or twisting words into a false 'gotcha' trap. The audience was also disgusting, many people needed to be ejected. Thomas got flustered, and that hampered his ability to rationally engage Sargon. There were dozens of issues Thom…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:54 AM
2

I found Carl's arguing there weak, because looking at the individual is impossible on a statistical basis. Thomas was absolutely right in saying Intersectionality allows a more nuanced view of our society.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:46 AM
1

Thomas does not identify as a Marxist, or even as a Socialist. He's a Capitalist by his own admission. In the past, he has argued against Collectivist emails from supporters, as he sees it (historical Communism: USSR, China, etc), and gone with the "Capitalism works because US hegemony" line of reasoning. So he's very much pro-capitalist in that regard. When he said "Freedom allows White Men to control everything", I could only understand him to be referring to the status quo. White men have mai…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:43 AM
2

Drunk bogans at an Australian horse race day. This kind of behaviour is par for the course.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/17 01:26 AM
-1

Man so many fights because she would tell me stuff about her day, me being a dude thinks logically and just offers solutions when she really just wants to say it all out loud. If you need a video to teach you to listen, then more power to you for getting something out of it. I don't see why it's bad to expect more than that from content here.
/r/seduction05/10/16 05:18 AM
-8

That gives the impression that I'm some king of pickup, which I'm not. No doubt someone could derive tips from the video, but I'd hope it doesn't have some level of mass appeal here. It just struck me as terribly basic stuff.
/r/seduction05/10/16 02:59 AM
-4

Honestly, I don't see how this is insightful. Going into a date in interview mode is going to result in a boring as fuck date for both of you. This video basically boils down to 'flirt with her'. Yeah, no shit.
/r/seduction05/10/16 01:33 AM
2

Create a fake FB account and upload a couple of quality pics of an ugly dude. You'll see. Tinder is incredibly superficial; the app is built to distill entire personalities into a single picture that 90% of people judge before swiping. I'm not sure why this is always touted as a surprise.
/r/seduction01/08/16 11:30 PM
2

If there's enough for regular small talk, and some commonality to generate interest, then there's no reason to ignore someone. Still gotta walk past her. Just gonna look like a thirsty dude that wanted a fuck.
/r/seduction10/07/16 07:33 AM
2

Didn't talk to her anymore after that and don't think I will. lol wtf.
/r/seduction10/07/16 03:52 AM
0

Well done, but the guy in Germany is a big red flag. Only exposing yourself to risk by taking that on, assuming this is going anywhere beyond where it already has.
/r/seduction22/06/16 01:05 PM
5

I really don't agree with that philosophy; met people that are worse than their images but also much better. It all comes down to individual differences, but mostly how well someone can control their online image. Some people put up shocking photos, some people just look better in reality where their face is more dynamic.
/r/seduction19/05/16 04:49 AM
8

treating this as serious advice
/r/seduction18/04/16 09:48 PM
-3

/r/seduction is useful. TRP is a cesspool, and any cesspool is going to have some diamonds in the shit. But you still need to wade through shit to get to them. Stick to /r/seduction. Rape isn't celebrated here.
/r/seduction15/03/15 11:49 PM
9

It crosses the border from being a place that just makes you better at talking to people (/r/seduction) to a place that fills your head with alpha male bullshit using pseudoscientific garbage. There's a reason TRP appears in subredditdrama regularly.
/r/seduction13/03/14 02:30 AM
3

TRP is a terrible fucking place.
/r/seduction12/03/14 11:40 PM
9

He didn't invent the word aesthetics, but he popularized his concept of 'aesthetic', which is what I described.
/r/seduction23/02/14 07:05 AM
19

He had a MASSIVE following. Among BB groups and /fit/, and some following among locals in Sydney. Dude was also roided to the max. He's known for popularizing the 'aesthetic' look, which in bodybuilding focuses on low bodyfat and sculpted muscles instead of raw strength and size.
/r/seduction23/02/14 05:35 AM
1

Confident women =! 'Sex in the City' type
/r/seduction15/10/12 07:33 AM
4

Men don't either, it's just more important.
/r/seduction14/10/12 04:35 AM
4

You're not attracted to confident women?
/r/seduction14/10/12 03:54 AM
4

Can't this feel condescending?
/r/seduction13/10/12 09:04 AM
1

Complex is probably the wrong word. We all find different things attractive in others, so it's the diversity I was trying to describe.
/r/seduction13/10/12 03:29 AM
1

You're looking at a complex and illogical issue in a black and white, logical fashion. There is no hard rule when it comes to looks and getting women, except that the woman being attracted to you usually helps (and this is completely random).
/r/seduction13/10/12 02:06 AM
1

Looks do matter, but I don't see how that makes game pointless.
/r/seduction13/10/12 01:14 AM
2

I typed it.
/r/seduction02/10/12 12:59 AM
0

Not quite true, but I'd be a pedant to elaborate.
/r/seduction01/10/12 12:02 PM
1

You're basically correct, but it's not productive because it's not specific. This is akin to someone asking a maths question and you responding "just calculate the answer, duh". OP knows what he has to do. He came here for a push, and for solutions he may not be aware of.
/r/seduction20/09/12 01:48 AM
1

I didn't downvote you, but you really aren't.
/r/seduction19/09/12 09:05 PM
1

I'd leave the job if I had to, but I won't tell you to do that. The best way, I've found, to cure 'oneitis' is to simply cut them from your life completely.
/r/seduction19/09/12 09:05 PM
2

Jesus Christ. Why did you show me that video? I feel incredibly awkward just watching it.
/r/seduction19/09/12 08:57 PM
3

"Well, she'll probably reject me and I don't want to come off as rude so I just won't approach." I don't know how anyone could walk away from this with that in their mind. Pretty much all of these guys were either rude, or awkward. Even the two guys at the beginning weren't very amiable, and didn't seem confident. Their conversation sucked, and it reflected in how they ejected. Maybe it's just me.
/r/seduction18/09/12 10:15 PM
1

It's not always possible. Rent is wasted money, and sinking yourself into a $400,000+ mortgage at this stage of life is silly (unless you have a decent amount saved).
/r/seduction31/08/12 12:41 AM
1

People expect you to be psychic? I don't see the problem with just saying 'no'. Gees..
/r/seduction23/08/12 08:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter