TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LoGun_ Archive

View 4 posts and 24 comments by LoGun_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Your title and the actual article are two completely different things. This isn't an issue because she's a woman, this is an issue because it's never been raised in NZ court before. The article specifically states that: "Justice Isac’s recently released decision stated that the Copyright Act and the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 interacted in an unusual way not previously seen in New Zealand law, forcing the Family Court Judge into new territory." I'm all about working to heal some of the ch…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:51 AM
9

Yes, they were never married and never lived together, but... Have you actually read the article? "Latner (guy) proposed several times and Climans (girl) accepted. He often referred to her by his last name. However, he insisted she sign a marriage contract and came up with several drafts. She refused. Throughout their relationship, the two kept separate bank accounts and never owned property in common. Nevertheless, Latner gave Climans thousands of dollars every month, a credit card, paid off he…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 10:33 PM
1

We can talk about the specific flaws in your arguments Here's the real truth. Being a billionaire, top professional athlete or fortune 500 CEO is basically utterly irrelevant to 99.9999% of the human population regardless of gender. The odds of it happening are vanishingly small for all but the 0.01% born in the right time, circumstances and society. The point the female empowerment movement is to help women believe that being female is not a barrier to their growth, progress, or development. It…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:25 PM
-1

I could reply to the points in your comment, but I honestly don't think it would provide much benefit to the conversation because you and I have completely opposite views of the world. You believe that your life situation and experience are dictated by forces outside your control. This sentence is the simplest example of that in your reply: "The odds of it happening are vanishingly small for all but the 0.01% born in the right time, circumstances and society." This sentence gives away the fact t…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 08:31 PM
0

That seems like a very angry and unproductive comment to what is a logical and fact-based position. Is there something specific you disagree with in my comment or did you just want to vent?
/r/MensRights08/05/21 07:42 PM
-1

I was going to write a detailed reply to your points but I don't think that's going to help either of us because you don't seem to want to look at the situation objectively, you just want to be right. You just want to prove that your life is hard and the world is against you and it's not your fault. You want to find someone to blame for your empty life, rather than a solution to it. If that's your primary goal then no facts or information I can present will change your mind because you'll always…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:25 AM
-14

It seems like my opinion here is against the prevailing one, but what you seem to be missing is that there are MANY examples of men succeeding in the world around you. What percentage of fortune 500 CEOs are men? What percentage of successful entrepreneurs are men? How much more air time is given to male sports? What percentage of world leaders are male? More emphasis is placed on female empowerment because there are already many, many, many role models for me to look up to. You don't need to be…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:54 PM
-1

You seem like the kind of guy who's committed to finding the truth. With that, you would know one of the foundations of the scientific method of investigation: Correlation does not equal causation. You look at these charts as facts and that they mean that one is the causation of the other. But that's not true, because that's not proven. All that's proven is that these two things occur at the same time. Just because birds fly south in the winter, doesn't mean that them flying south causes winter.…
/r/askTRP18/09/16 08:21 AM
5

These charts prove nothing. There are so many different ways to explain these charts other than 'having sex with lots of people makes your life suck'. Chart 1: You have a higher risk of an STD if you have more sexual partners? Oh, wow. That's startling. And also the most obvious thing I've ever read. The more exposure, the greater possibility of catching an STD. Move on. Chart 2: Women who have had more sexual partners are less likely to be married for 5 years. The fact that 80% of women who've …
/r/askTRP18/09/16 04:21 AM
1

I would define loving yourself as prioritising your own needs over the needs of others. And how do you start? Like these guys have said, work out what you want and go after it. There's really not much more to it. There's some deeper stuff you can work on, like why you're not prioritising what you want, discovering what you're really looking for, and looking at different ways to give yourself what you want, but those basics above are a good place to start. Hit me up if you want to look at blogs f…
/r/seduction29/05/13 12:41 PM
1

I'm not talking about no. 20, I'm talking about the last part titled: "Are you a boy or a Man?" is not the right question That's where the advice is. But hey, I honestly don't think that this is going to get us very far. It seems like you're far more concerned with impressing other people people and putting people below you than actually learning anything. And that's cool if you are. I just don't have time for these conversations. Cheers.
/r/seduction26/05/13 11:10 PM
0

If you read it to the end, you would have found the real advice.
/r/seduction26/05/13 06:37 AM
-1

Interesting mate. Which stuff from the seduction community does it use? And P.S. SCS is for free.
/r/seduction26/05/13 06:35 AM
1

Sure it did Hero. The over 300+ upvotes definitely agrees with you.
/r/seduction26/05/13 06:34 AM
2

I'm guessing you think these two contradict each other... I can't see it. Maybe you're smarter than me though. Care to try and explain?
/r/seduction26/05/13 06:32 AM
2

Read no.20.
/r/seduction25/05/13 10:43 PM
2

If you don't like yourself, you're going to have a serious hard time trying to get anyone else to like you. You can read and memorise and repeat and chant all you want, but nothing changes till you take action. You don't know where the line is until you cross it.
/r/seduction25/05/13 01:53 PM
6

Interesting. I just spent a few weeks in the states and I was surprised by how timid most guys there were so it's interesting that you see it from the other side. Not sure why it is... Maybe the guys in the states are just too afraid of a sexual harassment lawsuit! If you really want to blow your mind apart, head to Colombia. The girls there are unimaginably hot and the guys, for the most part, and the most timid and reluctant little fish I've EVER seen. It's incredibly common to see nerdy, timi…
/r/seduction25/05/13 01:46 PM
2

Hey mate, Have you considered that you might not need to escape them? I wrote an article about limiting beliefs that comes at them from a bit of a different angle that I thought might be worth a read. http://www.attractioninstitute.com/eliminating-your-limiting-beliefs-part-2-good-news-and-bad-news/ Check it out and let me know what you think.
/r/seduction25/05/13 01:00 PM
1

The best way to 'project' a playful, fun, and lighthearted persona around women is to actually BE playful, fun, and lighthearted. From what you're saying, it sounds like you're trying to force something that's not real and then women are not digging it. Do you actually feel genuinely fun and lighthearted around women or are you just projecting something fake to try and provoke a response and then women are smelling it and walking away?
/r/seduction12/03/13 07:52 PM
5

Dude, despite what you might think, this is a great situation to be in for 2 reasons. a. She's not going to get clingy, possessive, or demanding. If you're too busy to see her or have a date with another girl, you're not going to get hundreds of progressively more creepy texts demanding more attention. She's got other options and will be able to go and bother them. b. It means you can also see other girls. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Have fun with her, flirt with her, fool …
/r/seduction12/03/13 07:43 PM
2

The simpel fact that you've written so much information show that you have no idea what's going on. I didn't read it. There's FAR too much there. But the fact that you think that it matters what this one guy did once with some chick and then she looked at you and said these things with this dude who was wearing a blue hat says to me that you don't know what attracts girls to guys and how to work with it. I'll put it simply: she's not attracted to you. If she was, something would have happened in…
/r/seduction17/01/13 09:19 PM
4

I read about this in 'the brain that changes itself'. Totally fucking amazing. There are a couple of really slid applications for game, mostly to do with staying calm and centered around hot chicks. Imaging yourself staying calm and cool whilst approaching / talking / seducing hot chicks makes it 1000% times easier than when you get out in field. OBVIOUSLY, this shouldn't be used as an excuse not to approach or a substitute for real world experience (it doesn't matter how many times you image fu…
/r/seduction17/01/13 08:50 PM
0

Here's a better question: why are you trying to seduce a girl with low self-esteem? Do you really want an empty, unfulfilling night with a needy and clingy girl who'll sleep with you, just to get the validation of having someone like her? IMO, you'd do better off just going and finding girls with high self esteem than trying to work out how to lower yourself to girls with low self esteem.
/r/seduction17/01/13 08:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter