TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LoLThatsjustretarded Archive

View 0 posts and 121 comments by LoLThatsjustretarded on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

To be accurate, which is more important that being fair, feminists either simply hate men, or are okay being around other feminists that do while making excuses for them.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 03:52 PM
2

No. But honestly, outside of organized butthurt brigades on the internet, most people see no problem with the phrase.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:12 PM
11

1 in 3 females is raped in her lifetime No, they aren't. Not even close to that. You're a fucking liar. Nothing you say after that can possible have legitimacy.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 06:10 PM
-11

So you're just going to make up bullshit in your own head and use that as an excuse not to give a shit? You're a bad person, and no, you're not sorry. You're just looking for a fucking excuse to do nothing. Go fuck yourself, /u/redditorJemi, go fuck yourself. Tagging as 'doesn't give a shit about other people'. All because you've got a hate-on for religious people, you're just going to assume a cult because of a biblical name and no actual allegation of cult-behavior at all. That's sane and reas…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 03:35 AM
24

Valenti is a lying cunt. Women kill men all of the time, usually over nothing more than money or hurt feelings, the same as men. She hates men and idealizes women. She is the face of modern feminism. She is the most widely-read feminist on this planet.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:17 PM
5

The primary hallmark of fascism is that everything -- everything that exists anywhere -- must serve the ideological state. Feminism is fascist in it's nature at this point. They don't think any celebrity should exist who is not feminist. They do not think any works of art -- games, movies, television or books -- should exist that are not feminist in nature. They do not believe that any government program should exist which is not feminist in nature. Fascism is the essence of modern feminism. Eve…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:10 PM
1

Official policy, and what actually happens, are very often two different things. You are a child with no life experience. That much is very obvious from your statements. you don't 'get' what kind of country you live in yet. You still believe in the horseshit you were taught in school. But the rules are regularly tossed right out the window, and the political connections of this movement to the Democratic party prevent any enforcement actions from happening, because such actions are decided by po…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:05 PM
2

Oh, someone added language to a bill that will never be enforced! That solves everything!
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:02 PM
6

Never trust a feminist. They only give a shit about women. Men can die for all they fucking care.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:01 PM
10

No. Feminism is a special case. There is no other ideology that the press treats as untouchable. There is no other ideology that has quite so many accountability-dodges. There is no other ideology that someone can belong to, where otherwise reasonable people will act as if it makes whatever they do okay. But a feminist falsely accuses a man of rape and carries around a mattress? That's okay, it's just 'awareness raising'. Feminist shoots a man in the name of feminism? No, we can't hold that agai…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:59 AM
1

People wouldn't give a fuck. A few feminists on the internet would rant, and that's about it.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:54 AM
0

That is what should happen, but it can't happen in a system this corrupt, where judges and lawyers and politicians and businessmen all protect one-another from the same system that chews normal people up like popcorn. So yeah: burn, baby, burn.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:54 AM
6

The proper responses aren't going to happen, though. This judge won't be tossed off the bench, can't be sued and won't be held accountable in any other way. The system is broken, or vigilante action wouldn't be so appealing to so many people. There is a reason every other movie out nowadays is about someone tossing on a costume and beating the shit out of either criminals or corrupt businessmen/government officials.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:52 AM
-1

Reddit is full of pussies who talk a good game, but would never actually see justice be done. Let's be honest here, though, in a functioning democracy with a functioning legal system, they would be right. Be we live in a corrupt shithole of a democracy that doesn't have a functioning legal system due to a lack of accountability for the powerful and well connected. So vigilante action is justified against those the legal system will not hold accountable. I would rather have a functioning system, …
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:51 AM
3

Their demand that everything be done in the service of women is starving men of the resources they need to become high-value men. But it's more important that birth control gets full government funding, than it is to get decent jobs into this country or to end the corporate stranglehold on government.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:50 PM
2

The girl did her part. She knew what could happen to this man, and she did it anyway. She doesn't get a pass for that. They both, along with a few other people and the law itself, ruined his life.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:46 PM
1

It's clear. But trolls keep on trolling. I refuse to take anyone who ever says anything kind about feminism seriously on here.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:22 PM
2

This is why I oppose affirmative action. It isn't about righting historical wrongs. It's about liberals giving out candy to their voters -- guaranteeing that women and minorities get chosen over white men, who don't vote for them. It's disgusting and immoral, no different than vote-buying. It's racism and corruption dressed up as decency, which is all progressivism ever seems to be.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:21 PM
-1

So? At some point, if you're wrong enough, you deserve to be punished regardless of ill intent. If only to dissuade other people from risking being that wrong in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:42 PM
-2

A therapist isn't qualified to make this statement, to put it bluntly. Come back when you have a doctorate.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:40 PM
5

Do you not have your own agency? No. Free trade and feminism have stolen that from most men in this society. Neoliberalism has stolen that from men. That's why the neoliberals spend so much time screeching 'WAR ON WOMEN!!!' Because men want nothing to do with them.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:16 AM
3

If they can't start families, they won't feel it. And feelings matter more to a biological organism than logic or values do. Every feeling we have is linked to evolutionary purposes -- to instincts, to imperatives, to the thing we need to be to survive. You are an ape. You will always be an ape. It is mere conceit that causes you to believe otherwise. You are not a magical being conjured by a god or goddess. You are not a robot manufactured from some grand watchmaker. Humans only feel as worthy …
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:15 AM
7

A society cannot survive a significant portion of it's males having no investment in it. Men aren't getting married or starting families. They don't have access to solid, decent jobs. They have literally no actual attachment to this society at all that isn't forced upon them. You don't have to like reality to accept it. Hell, I want to visit Jupiter, but that isn't going to fucking happen. In the end, ISIS exists. It's very powerful. It wouldn't exist if a whole lot of men weren't 'losers' under…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:11 AM
4

In all fairness, actions have reactions. Right now the genders cannot trust each other, or at least men can't trust women to treat them like human beings on an interpersonal level. We can't trust women not to have vastly inflated opinions as to what kind of guy they 'deserve' (nobody deserves a mate of any kind; you get what you can win, through whatever method. Deserve doesn't have anything to do with it). So you cheat. It's really not much different than them wearing make-up. That's a lie, too…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:07 AM
3

Men are just trying to make women nod their heads. If you're a man women want, it's very easy to get most women to attack feminism in order to curry your favor, too. When I was in college, I accidentally took a Women in Literature class, not knowing that it was a feminist course. And the first girl they paired me with was very quick to state 'I don't really buy into this feminist stuff. My Enviro-sciences partner (also a girl) was even harsher. She said, 'Wow, it must suck to be with all of thos…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:04 AM
-1

I'd take your arguments seriously if you and your like-minded types didn't cuntishly downvote someone for disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:23 PM
3

And they prove your point by downvoting you.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:19 PM
6

Feminists had nothing to do with women's suffrage. That was an entirely different movement altogether, which feminists basically 'stole' years after it had died, much the same way Mormons often 'baptize' dead celebrities into their faith. They are vultures. But Suffragettes were mostly a bunch of church groups. They have closer ties to the abolitionists than to the feminists, both historically and ideologically.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:53 PM
1

Not all feminists have to be like that. Just the dominant strain has to be like that, and the rest will just follow along.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:49 PM
14

Schrodinger's Harassment: you won't know until after you ask a girl out if you're guilty of a crime or not, depending on her reaction to it.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:36 PM
6

I doubt it. The US won't want him once Obama's gone. The left hates to admit it, but Obama is an incredibly petty man who very often pushes harder than any other President to punish people who 'did him wrong'. Even Bush wasn't this bad. Obama is damned near Nixonian in his attempts to punish his enemies.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:35 PM
3

If it has to do with family court, then it has to do with men's rights. Edit: Go into a feminist board, any feminist board, and see if they don't talk about men who do this. And if you don't harass them about it, then don't harass us about this.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:22 AM
22

Yeah, and all women respond to semen with complete emotional maturity...
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:33 PM
2

The liberals on this sub act like fucking children, and then wonder why so many MRAs don't consider liberalism to be a viable ideology.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:31 PM
13

I've always hated her, starting with how she played Hermione. Let's all be clear here, if Hermione had been a man, everyone here would want to punch his stuck-up, arrogant, whiny face until his teeth fell out. People only act like she's 'empowering' -- instead of being an obnoxious douche -- because she's female. But she is not empowering. She is not 'competent'. She's just fucking insufferable.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:22 PM
2

Australia should be nuked off the map at this point.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:08 PM
3

And all feminists do is make war against largely innocent men and women. So what the fuck room do they have to talk?
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:07 PM
5

To a liberal government, men are nothing but piggy banks.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:05 PM
1

So... you can only know after the fact? Are you listening to yourself? This is insane circular reasoning? How can you be sure that you get a girl who won't do this? Puck a good girl. How do you know if she's a good girl? She won't do something like this...
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:00 PM
1

It's not 'copy pasta'. Look up a term before you use it.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 01:59 PM
1

Then he's bullshitting. But what if he's not? Which assumption, if found not to be true, will cause more damage?
/r/MensRights10/08/15 01:58 PM
1

And women shouldn't worry about domestic violence. If they're with a good guy he's not going to turn into a monster behind closed doors after a few drinks.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 01:56 PM
1

Men and women look for different things in a mate, with just 22% overlap in preferences, a new study reports.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:59 PM
6

Most of the porn I've seen where women call the shots is extremely abusive toward their male co-star. We're basically talking meatholes for boys type shit, with testicle abuse, violence, insults, and general abuse. Or, if there is no male-costar, abusive toward the disembodies 'audience'. Which fits the general reality of feminism, but doesn't exactly fit the view of feminism your typical feminist would generally support.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:57 PM
2

I don't know the breakdown on who actually buys (as opposed to simply consumes) porn. I have a feeling that it's mostly older men who buy porn, so it may make perfect sense to frame the question that way. After all, if the people who buy your category of product don't like your product, you better hope for extreme saturation in another demographic.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:55 PM
10

I leave my comfort zone all of the time for entertainment, but not for personal gratification. I watch horror movies. I like to see terrible things. But I don't want to be 'challenged' while I'm jerking off. And let's be clear here: to feminists, a man who challenges women is a misogynistic man-splainer who should mind his own business. So where the fuck do they get off thinking that they should 'challenge' men. I am sick and tired of these people making rules they think only men should have to …
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:52 PM
14

You won't learn how to have good sex by watching Feminist porn. In the real world, most women want it hard, a little rough and fairly dominant. And you are not going to see that in the kind of slow, romantic jazz-music sex you see in 'feminist' porn, or 'porn for women'. Even most women hate 'porn for women'.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:50 PM
4

Yes, but the same would be true of the women.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:33 PM
1

Something doesn't have to be true of all women to be true of women. I am a man. I do not like sports. But men like sports.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:32 PM
1

So? Either play by the same rules, or get butchered. You don't have to like reality to acknowledge it. Those who won't use violence will always be subject to those who will. And I will not be subject to some petty thug just because you don't have the courage to kick him in the balls.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:29 PM
0

The problem then becomes teo-fold. If going to war is justified by someone else doing it first, when is it over? When one side wins and the other side loses. Self defense is a natural right, and I will downvote anyone who says otherwise. The alternative to not going to war when attacked, is watching your home and fields being burned, your wife getting raped and your children getting butchered.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:27 PM
1

No he didn't. And it doesn't matter where the fuck it happened.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:23 PM
0

I am downvoting you for not posting against indicating that you were wrong. If you're going to ask for a source, respond when a source is provided. Otherwise, you just look like a hack who only wanted to spread doubt.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:22 PM
1

Idiots who think that they exist entirely to serve women. White knights are evil, no matter their motivation, because they are willing to sacrifice the rights of men at the altar of women's safety.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:17 PM
3

We may not need a white history month, but we could use a 'common' people's history month.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:33 PM
1

There is actually evidence that they make up more than 8% of false accusations. There is no proof, but 8% was the highest result on the lowest group of studies done on the matter. It's a joke to pretend that no study has yielded a higher result.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:32 PM
2

The history was not 'completely on board with it'. You have shrieking hysterics from people on just about ever sub. Stop fucking lying. Obviously /r/thefappening didn't have any problem with the fappening. Linking to them doesn't prove a god-damned thing.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:27 PM
3

It might be funny, but if she says shit like this, she doesn't get to shill for feminism and talk about how horrible women have it.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:22 PM
3

There is a word for this bullshit - concern trolling. And the mods at /r/TheRedPill get it, the mods here are weak as piss and allow faggots like you to spread you shit all over the place. While this could have been worded better, I mostly have to agree. The mods here are the kind of people that are too terrified to take their own side in an agreement. They are way harder on MRAs than they are on feminists and SRS types.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:20 PM
4

If that's all it is, then why the fuck has this been stickied? That isn't merely respecting free speech. That's endorsing a particular viewpoint.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:19 PM
6

I have never once met a feminist willing to engage in constructive dialogue. Feminists don't want a discussion. They want to give a lecture. So I simply have to disagree, and don't believe that this should even have been stickied. It was not a terribly popular post to begin with.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:17 PM
-4

I'm just going to upvote both of you, because it's clear that you are downvoting each other for no good reason. Quit acting like children.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:09 PM
3

He thinks that people in California should be allowed to tell the people of Arizona how to live their lives.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:08 PM
2

As a Canadian, you don't get a say, and it's kind of insulting that you think you do. You people still bow and scrape before the queen, FFS. She can dissolve your government with the stroke of a pen. She can refuse to seat duly elected officials. You have nothing to teach us about freedom. You don't even have freedom of speech over there. You don't an Equal Protection clause to your foundational documents. Americans understand that freedom is only secured by the barrel of a gun. And spare me the…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:06 PM
3

We attack feminism because they label all men as predators, while at the same time we label all feminists as crazy SJWs. They label all men as predators, we do not label all women as SJWs. We label all people in the ideology that bore SJWism into the world SJWs. And if they don't like that label, then they shouldn't wear the uniform of an SJW (in case it isn't clear, that uniform is the title 'feminist'). We can't choose not to be men. They can choose not to call themselves feminists. These are …
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:03 PM
1

Women actually have major issues in some parts of the world though. America has major issues we should probably take care of before we go gallivanting around, playing world hero. Indeed, I think that the elite in this country support feminism to the extent that they do primarily to distract left-wing activists from doing anything that might solve these problems, as any solution to them will have to come out of the pocketbooks of the wealth. You can't solve global warming without a lot of corpora…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 11:00 PM
2

They tend to just make shit up. They would accuse you of doxing, or of brigading, or whatever it is that will make other people go 'Oh, well I guess he had it coming', and they will never offer one shred of proof for their accusation.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:57 PM
1

Honestly, mockery has its place in any propaganda campaign. And yes, even if what you say is 100% honest and true, if you do it with the intention of swaying someone's viewpoint more closely to your own, it is propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:56 PM
2

Most of us have indeed done this. I tried explaining this to activists, to people on the liberal blogosphere, and was basically told to go fuck myself and banned from every venue of discussion. These people are a blight on humanity, in my viewpoint. A feminist is no better than a fascist or a fundamentalist or a communist in my view. Their way of looking at the world allows for no differences of opinion, no possibility that they may be wrong, no willingness to change. It is pure dogma, and no ma…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:54 PM
3

It is a leftist bromide, which despite my less-than-fully-liberal viewpoints I take to heart, that nobody ever won their rights by asking nicely for them.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:51 PM
2

Naivety has been a characteristic of mine for a long time. It takes a big person to admit this, and I do acknowledge that it can be very hard for a man or woman to change their basic nature. A lifetime of mistreatment from authority has made me extremely suspicious, and while I would often like to give people the benefit of the doubt, my experiences tell me that this is most often a mistake.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:49 PM
2

You can not have that discussion without discussing feminism. It is inherent. If you're discussion anti-feminism, you are also discussing feminism. If you're discussing how to make a room warmer, you are inherently talking about the cold whether you use the word or not, or address it directly or not. But in my experience, directness is usually the way to go.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:47 PM
1

Your analogy indicates that you believe me to be insane. As I said, questions with obvious answers are not valid. You clearly don't see how my statement relates to yours, but others do. Perhaps the error there is yours, and not indicative of madness on my part?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:45 PM
3

This isn't a valid point. We don't think Feminists are dumb. We think that most of them are flat-out wrong, and that their elite are outright evil (or if you'd rather, selfish, self-serving, mendacious and callous, which is what I considered evil. The real world doesn't have a Thanos or a Nyarlathotep. Human greed and narcissism is the closest you will ever get to true evil).
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:42 PM
1

No, he hasn't. What actually happened is that Elam pushed what is sometimes called Overton's Window in the direction of men's rights, allowing Farrel's opinions to gain greater purchase when compared to someone relatively more extreme.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:38 PM
2

I see that the feminists have gilded you...
/r/MensRights02/08/15 10:37 PM
0

Looks like the Feminist Defense Force is out in full effect today...
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:41 PM
4

And a 13 year old boy is not a man, you fucking retard.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:30 PM
7

You're just a troll, right? You can't honestly think 'Men should have to follow special rules nobody else has to follow' is going to go over well here, do you?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:30 PM
8

So you admit that you only support the statutory rape of men, and that you 100% support keeping it illegal when the victim is a woman. And you have the nerve to call other people SJWs? That's a prime SJW position right there -- that women deserve special protection from special crimes.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:29 PM
5

You're the one defending a rapist. Wanting justice for rapists is not SJWism. They just want to punish everyone without trial or due process. The problem with SJWs is that they don't really want justice; they just want to lash out at everything 'male'.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:27 PM
5

This is nonsense. He could well suffer psychologically without seeing himself as traumatized. Most men don't want to feel like victims, so it's entirely possible that they maintain an internal sense of agency even when they had none, and even when the subconscious effects are devastating. You have a simple mind incapable of seeing beyond the surface level of an issue.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:26 PM
2

Are there, honestly? Because I'm going to need you to back that up somehow. It doesn't jive with my personal experience. They might not have made a grand case about the abuse, but it probably did still happen. The shit you see in the news is the tip of the iceberg.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:34 AM
5

He managed to do fuck-all for men for decades. Paul Elam is half the reason there even is a men's movement right now. I don't give a fuck who influences you the most. You should care, but nobody else will. I care who made the bigger impact, and there's no comparison. Farrel failed for 30 years before Paul Elam managed to get men's rights ideas out there in the real world. Effectiveness matters more than your pearl-clutching.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:31 AM
4

You seem to believe that you're in /r/Egalitarianism. I would suggest you check the masthead.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:29 AM
3

His enemies also threw him in prison because he didn't take them seriously enough.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:28 AM
3

Feminism is one of our enemies. I just can't take anyone seriously who says otherwise without offering up a very real reason for saying it. And you just aren't.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:27 AM
1

I would suggest that you investigate what the fuck happened to Oscar Wilde before you retardedly pass of his advice.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:27 AM
4

Grow the fuck up and stop spouting childhood bromides. The bigger person is a loser. In the real world, you either play to win or get the fuck off of the field.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:25 AM
3

I don't consider it a valid question. The answer is obvious. Feminists are either responsible, or are the primary reinforcement, of most notions that harm men. None of you appear to be giving a valid reason to believe contrary, beyond 'it might make some people nervous', which is basically the same as 'it might offend someone', which if put that way would be dismissed out of hand.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:24 AM
0

Stop telling other people what they can and can't say.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:08 PM
0

I'll give a shit when you go to feminist subs and tell them to stop man-hating with terms like 'toxic maculinity' and 'patriarchy'.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:07 PM
1

It's often true. To many women think that a pussy is the only thing they need to hold a man's attention.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:06 PM
1

I would at least accept this line of thinking if it wasn't coupled with 'and any man who lets a bad experience with women color his judgment is a woman-hating nazi!'.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:05 PM
3

Shhh... this is reddit, and there are conservatives to hate (and liberals to lionize, or simply ignore if they do something anti-male).
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:28 PM
2

Liberals aren't our friends either, though, and most of this conservative bashing is clearly just a bunch of liberals trying to distract from that fact.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:27 PM
1

Yep. The media lie about everything. And what they don't lie about, they simply get wrong.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:39 PM
2

Except they got locked up for vandalism and desecration. Ruining other people's shit is not a valid act of protest unless the thing you're ruining is directly related to your oppression. A black man destroying a 'white's only' fountain in 1940s Georgia would be an act of protest, for instance, while a feminist wrecking a historian's office would not.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:38 PM
0

Tell me, what is a 'reasonable' response to an obvious load of horseshit? Does one try to debate against a big steaming pile that someone else has left on their rug? Do we discuss the relative merits of rug-shitting? Or do we yell and scream at the shitter? Because sometimes 'reasonable' really is the inferior option. You can't reason with madness or corruption, for instance.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:35 PM
1

Prove it. It's just as likely caused by decades of 'You go Girl!' bullshit, as it is some innate thing. And no, creating some abstract argument is not the same thing as 'proving' it.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:21 PM
6

I don't trust liberal politicians and activists for precisely this reason. Too many, deep down, think exactly like this. And the ones that don't just meekly hide.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:19 AM
4

/r/askwomen is universally despised by everyone but the absolute scum of the earth that posts there, so there is at least that.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:18 AM
30

What other kind of bystander gets this pissed off? If a bald-headed white dude went up to a bunch of pant-sagging black dudes and started ranting about how they shouldn't be allowed to call each other niggers if he can't, would you actually pretend not to know he's a skinhead? It's not like feminists give out membership cards. I promise you that this woman calls herself a feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/15 04:19 PM
30

Feminists really need to come to grips with the fact that their movement has become a haven for women with severe mental issues, and is fast morphing into little more than an intellectualization of misandry.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 03:47 PM
7

No, it's a 'feminists hire men to yell at other men' organization.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:59 PM
2

He likely can. They didn't admit wrongdoing, but that doesn't actually protect them. That just means that there will have to be a trial.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:39 AM
4

It's called lying. She had that authority. She was the presiding judge, she definitely had that authority. If nothing else, she had the authority to vacate the legal conviction and set him free.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:38 AM
-1

No, you're just a trolling shill as any casual perusal of your comment history will indicate.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:37 AM
1

No, you're just shilling. You should have ended with 'travesty', because to do otherwise makes it look like you're only saying that to gain credibility (which youthen used to attack an innocent man with likely made-up nonsense).
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:36 AM
0

More prosecutor lies, most likely, given the behavior of this lunatic. You're just an idiot who believes whatever someone with power tells you.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:35 AM
2

Oh gee, Mary P. Koss was behind this study. there's a fucking shock.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:20 AM
1

In Canada, maybe. It's obviously protected speech here in America.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:45 PM
2

It can be both, you know. You're not wrong, and shouldn't be downvoted this way (unless I'm missing something and you're a massive troll here), but it can easily be both. People that hate one group rarely keep that hatred restricted to its original target.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:57 PM
1

To me, one of the greatest attributes of being a "man" is not being as offended, and toughing things out. I think that's men's greatest weakness, personally. The squeaky wheel gets the oil, after all. So long as you try to 'tough it out', the problems you do care about will continue to be ignored. They didn't stop cutting people's heads off in France until the noblemen and women started crying and begging them not to. Trying to go out with dignity only served to incite further violence by making…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:54 PM
2

I know. It's like these people think it's just 'natural' to inconvenience men for the sake of women, so they don't even get what's wrong with it.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:52 PM
1

Wait, so when biology inconveniences men, people like you always argue that there's nothing to be done about it, because it's not society to blame, but nature. But when biology inconveniences women, that argument is ignored entirely.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:51 PM
1

California is a lot like Texas: a shitty state that does almost everything differently from the rest of the country, and are somehow convinced that they are 'better' because of it.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:50 PM
1

No they won't, not multi-person bathrooms. Most people are never going to be comfortable going to the bathroom around strangers of the other gender. Hell, a lot of people aren't comfortable in single-sex public bathrooms. Why should I ever be expected to pull my dick out and urinate in front of a woman?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:47 PM
1

I currently work in a restaurant. We have three bathroom: one for each gender, and a one-person unisex one with a baby-changing station. Never had any lines or complaints.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:46 PM
7

When she asked for money for an abortion she didn't need, with the threat of child support for a child that didn't exist hanging over his head. She doesn't have to state the negative consequence if it's obvious. If I dangle you from a cliff and demand $100 to pull you up, I don't actually have to mention dropping you to get brought up on extortion charges.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:45 PM
21

She isn't crazy. She's just a cunt. They have pills to help with crazy. There isn't a damned thing in the world you can give a woman like this that'll help her be less of a cunt.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 01:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter