LobsterHefty1239 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD What conversations?	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/25 10:54 PM
1	N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD Your attempting to undermine credibility rather than address the actual argument or evidence. This is classic ad hominem and poisoning the well. Instead of disproving any point, you try to make your opponent look dishonest or manipulative. You went straight for you’re a propagandist. Nice Classic move when there’s no counter-argument. Mocking a study’s sample size doesn’t erase its findings, and yelling religious funding without evidence doesn’t make the data disappear.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/25 10:47 PM
1	N COUNTS WEEKLY DISCUSSION THREAD Lol, you hit almost every fallacy in the book. Ad hominem with the “faithful religious person” jab when you lost, strawmanning every study as “religious” or “frat thesis” instead of addressing the findings, moving goalposts from “show non-religious” to “lol small sample” after he dropped Teachman, while ignoring national datasets, and even evading the burden of proof with zero studies of your own.	/r/PurplePillDebate	28/10/25 03:27 PM