TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lobstermansunion Archive

View 60 posts and 788 comments by Lobstermansunion on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
551

False AccusationLobstermansunion/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:34 PM
292

DiscussionLobstermansunion/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:35 PM
271

MR Blogs/VlogsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:59 PM
157

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:51 PM
137

Misleading TitleLobstermansunion/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:35 PM
129

FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:48 PM
111

Social IssuesLobstermansunion/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:58 PM
96

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:32 PM
87

Anti-MRMLobstermansunion/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:23 PM
85

DiscriminationLobstermansunion/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:01 PM
81

re: FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:50 PM
69

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:05 PM
60

NewsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:48 PM
60

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:31 PM
54

False AccusationLobstermansunion/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:51 PM
50

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:18 AM
50

re: FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:50 AM
48

NewsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:09 PM
48

Men's Rights NewsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:58 PM
48

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:35 PM
44

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:50 PM
40

Social IssuesLobstermansunion/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:03 PM
37

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:12 PM
37

Social IssuesLobstermansunion/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:40 PM
34

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:20 PM
34

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:01 PM
32

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:46 PM
30

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:25 PM
29

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:04 PM
29

DiscussionLobstermansunion/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:44 PM
28

FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:05 PM
27

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:06 PM
26

Legal RightsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:43 PM
26

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:58 PM
25

DiscussionLobstermansunion/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:01 AM
20

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:17 PM
20

False AccusationLobstermansunion/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:36 PM
19

OutrageLobstermansunion/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:13 AM
19

Activism/SupportLobstermansunion/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:35 PM
18

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:45 PM
18

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights04/09/14 01:31 PM
18

re: FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:55 PM
17

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:41 AM
17

Social IssuesLobstermansunion/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:19 PM
10

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights10/06/14 02:22 PM
10

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:56 PM
8

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:59 PM
7

Social IssuesLobstermansunion/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:52 PM
7

Men's Rights NewsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:17 PM
7

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:32 PM
6

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:41 AM
4

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:30 PM
3

Lobstermansunion/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:42 PM
3

OutrageLobstermansunion/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:01 PM
2

QuestionLobstermansunion/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:13 PM
1

FeminismLobstermansunion/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:34 PM
0

Blogs/VideoLobstermansunion/r/MensRights10/10/14 12:17 AM
0

MR Blogs/VlogsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:55 PM
0

OutrageLobstermansunion/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:31 PM
0

MR Blogs/VlogsLobstermansunion/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Agree on all points. I also think he's going to do better with minorities than "conventional wisdom" says.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:37 PM
1

I just finished reading a couple of his books. He's the real deal. Not pointless. But that doesn't mean he's not a johnny-come-lately to anti-misandry.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:36 PM
6

It is fair to say that Trump could pull in the male vote more so than any politician we've seen in a long time. (That's not an endorsement FYI.)
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:54 PM
18

Only a few years ago Scott Adams was saying that men should shut up about misandry because their focus should be on getting laid.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 05:46 PM
1

Biology: It's a man's job to take hold of his innate superiority and it's a woman's job to hijack it for her own.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:47 PM
5

Women's entire lives revolve around trying to control men and then despising the men with whom they are successful.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:20 PM
1

I'm wondering if the author is a crypto-mra or mgtow. They fairly quoted Elam and the "criticisms" were from simpering traditionalist Wilcox and a "you go grrrrrl" professor saying things we've heard a million times before.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:14 PM
2

I have spent twenty years of my life fighting for equality. For men and women. For my efforts, I have been mocked, laughed at, slandered, ignored, and gotten death threats. From women. The Men's Rights Movement has been around almost as long as the feminist movement in one way or another, and has experienced the same thing. Meanwhile, Feminists get more demanding and obnoxious, the rights of men continue to wither away, and this is seen as progress by the vast majority of women. I simply am not …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:10 PM
1

"I think it's EQUALLY necessary that men be able to walk away from a child they didn't want, no strings attached, as well." That's never, ever, ever going to happen because women will never allow it. Women's promises of equality are a sham. Therefore, the job of men is to guard their cake with their lives and fight for more of it.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:16 PM
3

By taking that label, you legitimize the radical feminists. They will happily point to you to say what feminism is while behind your back they plot against men.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:28 PM
2

It's not new. Radical feminism has always been at the core of Feminism. We're just in a period of time right now when they're being empowered to let their freaks out in the open.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 08:14 PM
1

Feminism is only a manifestation of female desire. It's cold, calculating selfish female nature.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:22 AM
1

Because women are biologically designed to parasite off men and men are biologically designed to empathize with women. The few exceptions to the rule are mental freaks and that's why we're not taken seriously, no matter how "rational" we are. You have to get all that equality shit out of your head. Humans are animals. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 11:21 AM
1

Interesting how Feminists never apply the "believe her" standard to all the women who have accused Bill Clinton of sex assault.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:45 PM
1

Your rationale would be sound, if Feminism & SJWism were a rational thought process. They are not rational. They are religious beliefs. Most will not be willing to question their religions of feminism and social justice, because it is wrapped up in their self-identity and sense of purpose.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 06:09 PM
3

This is a very perceptive argument. However, you are giving people too much of the benefit of the doubt that they are going to change their opinions on groups they hate simply because they have now experienced SJW tactics themselves. Cenk is still going to make fun of MRAs and filibuster Girl Writes What with inane jibber jabber. Blue-haired female Sanders supporters are still going to hold tightly to whatever form of female supremacism they had beforehand, while they say Hillary isn't a "real f…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:37 PM
14

She will only be forced to defend if the media forces her to defend. At this time they are attacking the victim and covering for Hillary. I think this is only the tip of the iceberg of what Trump is going to reveal about her & Bill so stay tuned.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:46 PM
1

Would your women friends sacrifice their money or their lives to save the lives of men? Would your woman friends put up with anti-female laws and courts because they want to ensure men get the benefit of the doubt? Would your women friends turn down special female privileges unless a comparable benefit was offered to men? Would your women friends go out of their way to protect, help and support men, simply because they were men, without any expectation of return? Men do these things for women ev…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 04:21 PM
1

Nah. The idea that women are helpless princessesses represents the majority of the population. it's biological.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:04 PM
0

Yes it is. Women do not give a shit about men, and are frankly amoral parasites at heart when it comes to their views on men. If you can't show them how something helps them and other women they won't care.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:03 PM
2

Agreed. Unfortunately we have to go to battle with the only general we have. As troubling as he may be at times.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:26 PM
2

Hillary is by far the more warmongering candidate. Like war? Vote Hillary.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 07:24 PM
1

Women's honest desires are misogynistic and probably criminal, don't you know.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 08:30 PM
3

If you look at their stats the majority of people who visit the site are women. It's not a website designed for men. It's a website designed for women who want to feel self-superior and men who pee while sitting down because wifey says so.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:15 PM
3

Because men's safety and security is not valued by women & society, and it is more important to women & society that women are portrayed as princesses. If women discovered that men's fingers contained a miracle beauty treatment, they would demand laws to cut off men's hands.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:43 AM
11

Decades ago, employers actually preferred married men because it was perceived they would be more stable hires. Oftentimes, men had to be married with children to be considered management material. That's not the case anymore. Nowdays, the main drawback to being a single professional is that sometimes you're more likely to get laid off because the managers will feel less bad about it.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:40 PM
20

That's because their wife & family is a sword of damocles poised over their heads to work themselves into an early grave. I don't advocate single men being unproductive with their lives but I can certainly see why a bachelor may want to "work to live" rather than the other way around. I'm quite career-motivated and as a single man that just means more money for me.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 03:50 PM
20

Code: "We now realize that men are starting to wake up, so we need to loosen the thumbscrews by 10% in the hopes they'll fall back asleep."
/r/MensRights09/05/16 03:46 PM
0

Prager is awesome on many issues but he is speaking the wisdom of an era that no longer exists. The young generation of conservatives & traditionalists are steeped in reactionary & red pill ideas - and they will terrify the old stick-in-the-muds as soon as the fogies bother to pay attention.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 03:40 PM
2

For the most part, no they will not care because 1. they are not biologically designed to empathize with men by default. They have to want to. 2. Society trains them to unleash their worst instincts on men without remorse. They will not genuinely care, but the vast majority will be willing to compromise so long as she perceives that she is getting more out of the deal then you are. Notice I only said "perceives." Nor need this be a logical process. Men like to approach things with logic,but that…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 06:49 PM
2

"And he will love me for who I am!!!!"
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:00 AM
9

Why would you date someone who belongs to a hate movement? Show some self-respect man. For goodness sakes.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 12:48 AM
1

I hate to burst your bubble, but it does not matter how obnoxious sjw's get or how rational Mra's are in contrast. The problem is not feminism - it's the inherent selfishness of the female and the cowardice of the male that is to blame for all of this. It is very likely that feminism will fall out of favor in coming years. That will change nothing, because women will demand all the same double standards and a majority of men will slavishly provide. I have been outspoken about these issues for al…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 10:43 PM
1

let's make some slogans: "Hookup With Homeless Men; Women Get Empowered Then!" "End The Sex Gap: Sleep With Ugly Short Fat Men For Equality." "Women Will Take Over Boardroom When You Let Mediocre Men In Your Bedroom."
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:34 AM
4

let's make some slogans: "Hookup With Homeless Men; Women Get Empowered Then!" "End The Sex Gap: Sleep With Ugly Short Fat Men For Equality." "Women Will Take Over Boardroom When You Let Mediocre Men In Your Bedroom."
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:33 AM
4

Then you're the second woman I've heard of in my nearly 40 years on the planet who comprehends this. Exceptions prove the rule, I guess.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 09:27 PM
2

Try being a man in public relations or media buying (a sector of the marketing industry.) You will be openly discriminated against by hostile bigoted women who consider you infringing on their turf.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:25 PM
4

That's because it's a female double standards game. Feminism is an outward expression of female thoughts and desires.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:23 PM
4

Nice job man. Good stuff and so true. But we might as well be trying to teach howler monkeys how to write in iambic pentameter for how effective we're ever going to be in getting women to understand this.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:55 PM
3

Basic economic ignorance and basic ignorance of human sexual selection pressures.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 02:21 PM
70

A man's value in the eyes of society is based on his wealth and power. This is primarily based on female sexual preferences. Therefore, I assume that Cash will start a movement to convince women to fuck poor & weak men. To be honest, it will be a healthy development for society, and Cash has my support. lol
/r/MensRights22/04/16 12:51 PM
6

RE: ladies' night - if you're not the customer, you're the product.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 05:28 PM
2

Whether it happens frequently is less of an issue than the fact women face no consequences from such behavior.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:36 PM
3

They thrive on being helpless and selfish while at the same time claiming to be so superior to men. I'm sick and tired of it. And it just keeps getting worse.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:16 PM
7

Given that Paglia is a strong voice for women's agency and self-autonomy, I can see why she is soundly rejected by modern women who want to be treated like the pitiful little babies they are.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:38 PM
2

Yeah it isn't possible to come upon an honest accounting of the causes of misandry in modern society without examining the role of man-hating and man-exploiting bible bangers. I'm as suspicious of Christians saying "Christianity is here to help men" as I am feminists saying "feminism helps men too."
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:41 PM
2

"And a lot of it is because of Hollywood and media. Feminism don't have the strength to create these images -- although they make use of them and give them more publicity." Good point. But feminist-influenced creators, producers and media probably have a heavy hand in it all. "And, by the way, female chimpanzees are afraid that males rape or hurt them. It goes back a long time, perhaps." True, but: Humans have animal instincts but we are (or should be) expected to rise above them. If as a societ…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:33 PM
4

Women's "insecurity" as a collective have basically nothing to do with logic and a lot to do with how they "feel" on an individual level. In Western societies, men have always been in more danger than women. And in modern society, women have never been safer than they are now. Violent crimes, including rapes, are going down on a yearly basis. Yet we cannot turn around without seeing or hearing some kind of "women in constant peril" message and irrational women making wild accusations / pleas abo…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:52 PM
4

While your statement is true, I don't believe it is a cause of bias against male sexuality. There are many former and current societies where male sexuality is not vilified and it's not as if evolution worked differently for them.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:55 PM
5

Decades of feminist and social conservative propaganda.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 03:52 PM
3

It's biological. Women instinctively want the best genes for their babies they can get and the best provider of resources they can get. They need not come from the same man, or a man at all. The old mating system reined in unchecked male desire for many sexual partners and reined in unchecked female desire for constant grabbing at "bigger and better." Despite its many imperfections it allowed for social stability. The "new" mating system isn't new at all. It's a return to the jungle. I'm just wa…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 05:07 PM
2

There are many older feminists i really like (such as Camille Paglia) and agree with most of the time. However, I am inclined to feel some of these feminists mainly keep the label out of nostalgia. I fear that when they call themselves feminists, it provides cover for the nasty people. By the way, the man-hatred isn't the only problem I see with modern Western feminism. I don't think they do women any favors training them they are perpetual victims. modern feminism's tendency to manufacture grie…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:36 PM
2

This is a change. A few years ago Forbes was pushing the myth.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 01:44 PM
3

You may be a decent and rational person. Good for you. But Feminism is a hate movement that puts the priorities of upper class white women over every other class of people. You should consider other movements that better express your personal beliefs.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 01:02 PM
4

That's because women are encouraged to be substandard people. If men were encouraged to be substandard people, we would do some of the same stuff. To paraphrase Thomas Sowell, we are all born as barbarians. And we will remain so unless we are socialized out of it. Women are socialized to stay barbarians.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 07:19 PM
1

I could see Bernie or Hillary supporting this if elected President, but they're not going to support it beforehand because it would piss off their man-hating feminist benefactors. (Yes, Bernie has feminist benefactors too. Don't be foolish.)
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:27 AM
1

Guys, this debate will be over in 15 minutes if we start mentioning "Bill Clinton is accused of sexual assault by multiple women. Should we believe his alleged victims?" I know a lot of people on this Reddit are leftists and don't want to hurt your own team but maybe consider that the electoral power of the feminazi party is less important than shifting the cultural narrative on sexual assault allegations.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:24 PM
2

Modern feminism is a symptom of the dark side of female nature. Obviously it is a vile and destructive ideology, but even if it went away or reformed we'd still be dealing with similar problems. Humans are flawed creatures and a glaring flaw in women is a tendency to crass, solipsistic selfishness. Even if women burned an effigy of Gloria Steinem in Times Square they will still turn around and demand all the same double standards, and men will give them what they want because women are our krypt…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 08:58 AM
1

You're thinking logically. Women do not think logically when they're looking to date. Here is what they want, in descending order. 1. Excitement 2. Excitement. 3. Excitement. You sound similar to a younger version of me. We are about as exciting as cold oatmeal to the thrill-seeking young women of today. The way I see it, you have two options. 1. Become a gangbanger, or obsessed druggie, or unpredictably violent sociopath. Women love that shit. 2. Focus on yourself and what you want to do with y…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:55 AM
1

yes. There's nothing you can do about it. Just behave as selfishly as your female counterparts and look after yourself and you'll probably be fine. Don't risk yourself for a culture that hates you for the shape of your genitals.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 08:33 PM
10

It's not that they're not capable it's that nobody holds them responsible.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:13 AM
63

Your mistake is reasoning with her rationally. Tell her that the presumption of innocence protects marginalized populations from racist cops and racially motivated accusers. Then subtly mention that the KKK also was against presumption of innocence. This has the benefit of being absolutely true, by the way.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 02:27 PM
6

Maybe that's because college-educated men are about as exciting to women as cold oatmeal, unless they are also hot and/or rich.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:45 AM
2

Damn shame. This pandering feminist collaborator deserves to experience the precise consequences of feminist authoritarianism he has enabled.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:35 AM
15

You know things have gotten bad when Kristen Stewart is the thoughtful voice of reason.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:16 AM
2

There's really no reason to be angry about this, as heavy metal is an abyss of depravity. I say this as a metal fan.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 10:00 PM
3

So you're saying you're too lazy to reform your movement and instead just want everyone to forget decades of sordid hatred, violence, hypocrisy and racism?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:05 PM
9

The men's movement is a noble but ultimately futile cause. Society will always treat men as disposable because it is the process by which the ruling class gains power. And the vast majority of women are incapable of percieving men, as a class, as human beings. Feminism, as an organized political movement is on its way out (thanks in no small part to the men's movement) but largely because the authoritarian political left has peaked and is now on a downward trajectory. But gynocentrism is thrivin…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 11:10 AM
15

With the introduction of sex robots, feminists will find common cause with religious traditionalists to try and have them banned. It will be part of the growing alliance between gynocentrists on the Right and Left as radical feminism falls out of favor.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:56 PM
5

Millions of young women could burn an effigy of Gloria Steinen in Times Square and it really won't make any difference until they're willing to actually give up their privileges and stop looking at men as their donkeys.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:07 PM
6

The declining rate of marriage means the people likely to be married are ones who's personal values (such as religion) insist on it.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:28 AM
1

It is pointless but the fight against it attracts attention and keeps a lot of men from making horrible mistakes like getting married.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:00 PM
3

Well I think he might work in manufacturing. Such jobs are not exactly inundated with gender theory ideologues and if he is a part of a union he can't be fired on the say so of Internet crybullies.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:24 PM
2

Marxism. Critical Theory. Maybe in some more logical alternate reality Marxism and men's rights can coexist but not in this one. That's not to say you can't be an MRA, it's to say your allies on the Left are Feminist shocktroopers.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:59 PM
10

There is nothing new in this article but the guy seems pretty aware. My feeling is that the LinkedIn man-hate is part of the Hillary For President campaign and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if LinkedIn (and Twitter and Facebook) was ensuring grrrl power rhetoric gets top exposure. Hillary needs the entire female population in a frothing lather of man-hate to overlook the fact she is a tremendously flawed candidate with a sex predator husband.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:40 PM
3

I agree. Part of it is a reaction to increasing pushback against feminism. Part of it is because media is desperate for clicks on their content. Thirdly, media DESPERATELY wants Hillary Clinton to be elected and they think they can accomplish that by getting the female population in a frenzy. I think there's a good possibility that will happen.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 12:20 PM
3

Some white nationalists are among the most gynocentric hardcore woman-worshippers on the internet. Others, such as Ramzpaul, are more "red pill" though.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:09 PM
1

Glen Poole wrote a long article a couple of years ago about how men needed to "man up" and marry the fabulous and impeccable (of course) women of today. I'm highly suspicious of any of his "advocacy."
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:51 PM
3

Gloria Steinem: the heroic patriarchy-destroyer that just so happened to polish Henry Kissinger's knob after her time working for the CIA.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:13 PM
1

What in my statement made you think I was supporting MSNBC? You're preaching to the choir. :)
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:38 PM
3

I don't watch any TV news channels but FOX is really no more or less biased than the others. In fact, Pew Research rated FOX more fact-based than MSNBC.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 06:31 PM
1

Regardless, it will be "all men's fault" and we will be expected to "fix it."
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:39 PM
0

Untrue. But they excuse and/or openly collaborate with the feminists who do.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:37 PM
1

Hypergamy is definitely relevant but another factor is men don't tend to put much thought to their pictures. No one is naturally photogenic, so if you're just carelessly taking any photo and slapping it on your online profile you very well might appear worse-looking than you are in person.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:45 PM
9

It will never happen. The few women who "get it" don't need to be told and the majority will get more ornery & delusional as they get older.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:08 PM
5

The manosphere has been trying to get women to understand this for over two decades now. They clearly do not want to listen and won't process what we're saying even if they do. We might as well tell trees to stop dropping their leaves in the fall.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 11:57 AM
1

So the several years' worth of articles calling him the Feminist porn star were done without his agency or consent?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:26 PM
2

Right. And none of us should feel sorry for him. He's getting what he pushed for, whether he is guilty or innocent.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:44 PM
38

"I cynically championed feminism to advance my career and now I am SHOCKED and APPALLED when I am the man who gets the ass end of it. These things were supposed to happen to all the other men in the world. Not me, the feminist man."
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:37 PM
0

I hear you, but then I see him on Twitter bragging about beating his wife and saying how he wants to rape infants.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 10:48 PM
3

Gavin McInnes is a very bright guy and admirable in some ways, but he has less P.R. sensibility than Paul Elam when it comes to making appalling, indefensible statements.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:28 PM
6

My understanding is that we can't link to individual Twitter accounts but she has an account under her name if you want to search for it
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:12 AM
1

Income inequality has increased faster and larger under Obama than under the last three presidents. 2. The Federal Reserve's quantitative easing program enriches financiers at the expense of everyday Americans' life savings and purchasing power. Quantitative easing has the full support of the Obama administration. 3. Obama/Democrats financial "reform" primarily benefits large banks and large Wall Street financiers at the expense of community banks and small investors. Elizabeth Warren even ackno…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:48 PM
17

Your argument, while well-intentioned, fails to take into account that men cannot even take a breath without being told how any attention they give to women is harassment, creepy, and rapist-like. It should be no surprise that men are seeking other means for dating, if not dropping out of the dating scene altogether. Most women are not like that but most women do not utter a peep to defend men either. If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:35 PM
13

On Twitter, both men and women are telling her the reality of the situation and she is in total denial.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:25 PM
3

I don't dismiss the possibility there may be some truth to this, but I think SJWs are explained by much less conspiratorial means: Major Left-leaning parties in the West have to walk a delicate balancing act between pleasing their political base and avoiding pissing off their monied benefactors. Left-leaning parties are experiencing success right now because they are willing to help the 1% get richer while pretending to care about the working class. For example, in the US, the richest people in …
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:35 PM
1

Did you miss when he was singing "Bomb, Bomb Iran" in press conferences? Sober and rational individuals with cautious foreign policies do not sing songs about starting WWIII.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:55 PM
1

LOL. Whoever is telling her to invoke 9/11 to explain her obedience to Wall Street might be a GOP plant. The female pandering thing at least makes electoral sense.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:31 PM
4

I voted for Obama in 2008 only because the invasion of Iraq was the single worst decision any US president has made in my lifetime, and McCain was going to do the same in Iran. I think Obama is a reprehensible human being, and even in 2008 I had my doubts, but I don't know what else I'm supposed to do when the GOP keeps nominating borderline retarded holy warriors for POTUS.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:23 PM
1

As I said above, I give it a 20% chance it becomes a problem for her. But some powerful people are going to have to want to make it a problem for her.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:52 AM
1

I give it a 20% chance she will face problems from this. But someone with money's going to have to cough up a lot of it and run a mass media campaign to make it an issue.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:51 AM
27

"VAGINA VAGINA VAGINA!!!" cheers and loud applause come from adoring crowd
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:18 AM
1

It is impossible for HRC to rectify her husband's behavior (proven and alleged) with modern feminist rhetoric. 80% chance the media will do what they always do for corporate leftists and cover for her. 20% chance this is going to be a problem for her.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:17 AM
6

SJWs Always Project - "I'm driven to treat women like shit so every other guy must be that way."
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:27 PM
1

Romney was not a stellar candidate but 2012 was an orgy of identity politics, both in terms of race and in terms of gender.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:23 PM
1

We'll see. I would not count out the media's ability to get femalekind in a mass feminist lather by Nov 2016.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:22 PM
1

Because VAGINA, that's why.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:20 PM
14

Well, obviously because Patriarchy! :P
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:29 PM
6

Good for you. PS he may not be your first choice but I'd vote for Jim Webb over any of the current people running for the nomination, be they GOP or Dem. It's a shame Dems shut him out.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:23 PM
23

Many of you guys will still be voting for her, even after the year of feminist pandering we are about to get from her.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:26 PM
1

Not only that, but she protected him from all the women who accused him of rape.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:13 AM
8

Unfortunately they really don't deserve better, because they have proven to be shockingly easy to pander to.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:11 AM
6

The "War on women" got Obama re-elected in 2012 and Obama isn't a woman. What do you think it's going to do for an actual woman?
/r/MensRights02/12/15 02:09 AM
20

Women eat this shit up like pumpkin spice cupcakes.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:04 PM
44

This is but a single drop in what is going to be an Atlantic Ocean of feminist pandering & anti-male rhetoric to come out of the Hillary campaign. And it will work, unless Democrat men grow a spine and pull their support from the party.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 10:00 PM
2

SJWs Always Eat Their Own
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:54 PM
5

That is what we are seeing now and it's the only reason liberals are starting to have concerns. If only conservatives and libertarians were getting annihilated by the left-wing mob they would be perfectly happy.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:26 PM
6

For some, sure. For most, this is just hand-wringing and empty talk they will never back up with action. Sane liberals are dependent on the political power hardline progressive ideologues give them, similarly to how sane conservatives are dependent on the bible-bangers.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:24 PM
13

It doesn't matter. Until these "realizations" lead to direct political action that is successful, SJWism will still be the religion of the progressive elite. Progressives are raising their middle fingers at the world right now, including their liberal "allies" and will continue to do so until liberals 1. stop supporting left-wing institutions & 2. lack of support results in progressive political losses in several election cycles.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:25 PM
15

James Deen is an open collaborator with Feminists. If any one of us were in his position he would be cheering for our annihilation. He deserves not a shred of sympathy, and is getting exactly what he deserves. SJWs Always Eat Their Own
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:41 PM
1

McCain has done a remarkable transformation from "gender issues don't matter" three or four years ago to being a full-time, 24/7 critic of feminism now. He must be getting serious traffic from it.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:18 PM
5

In the past, it was understandable if some men were "confused" about feminism & didn't realize how radical it was. Nowadays, that's no longer an excuse. And this guy was an open collaborator. Fuck him. He's getting exactly what he wished on other men.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:36 PM
2

In the past, it was understandable if some men were "confused" about feminism & didn't realize how radical it was. Nowadays, that's no longer an excuse. And this guy was an open collaborator. Fuck him. He's getting exactly what he wished on other men.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:35 PM
-13

James Deen is a feminist collaborator who is getting exactly what he deserves. He would not be defending any of us should the shoe be on the other foot, so we should certainly not be feeling sorry for him. He should turn himself into the police immediately and demand the worst punishment allowed by law.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:20 PM
-5

James Deen is a feminist. This is absolutely the best thing that could happen to him and I hope he goes to jail for 50 years.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:06 PM
23

No. I'm actually totally fine with this tactic. Meritocracy is great. Quotas suck.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:56 AM
6

You are absolutely wrong about this. The hatred and disenfranchisement of men did not appear in a vacuum. Women do not care about "men" as a demographic other than wanting what men can do for them. There is piles and piles of historical and biological evidence of this. Man-hating feminism did men a favor to show us how little women cared about men as a collective, especially when compared to how deeply men love women. Some individual women are different, and some individual women may care deeply…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:12 AM
4

I am wondering if part of the backlash is that she has footage of some prominent feminist doing something scandalous. Like, maybe Michael Kimmel threatened her or something.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 10:58 PM
-9

Gregory Alan Elliott is a feminist. Why on earth are we helping him? He deserves what he's getting, and if the shoe was on the other foot he wouldn't give a damn about us.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 03:21 PM
8

I've noticed the same thing about LinkedIn. Keep your profile nice & up to date and only log in when you need to. I know for a fact many recruiters & hiring managers think LinkedIn is becoming too much like Facebook so if you don't participate in the groupthink you're actually better off. Just keep in mind the full-on "war on women" bullshit is going to be at about 100,000 decibels in every single mainstream media outlet & social media network for the next year because they're trying to get Hill…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:59 PM
3

Not a men's rights issue, but don't help the homeless unless you are like volunteering for a non-profit or whatever.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:51 PM
71

Do not apologize. Your apology will not stop them from railroading you. Social justice warriors percieve any conciliatory attempts as an admission of guilt. They want your head on a pike. You should not have censored yourself. This revealed your weakness to them, now they are going in for the kill. You should have said "Submit to me in writing the complaint, signed by the complainants" and go talk to a school official to review the policies for this. It doesn't matter how "progressive" you are. …
/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:31 PM
6

Then men in tech should start doing what men in government, law, academia, and the corporate world are doing - avoid working with women in any way if there are no neutral witnesses present.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:20 PM
6

So a feminist wants to silence marginalized groups who can't afford a post high school education?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 01:00 AM
2

Well, yes. That's because the wife demands he dump all his friends not in control of her. I've lost several male friends that way. One specifically said that she wanted me out of his life because I was unmarried. Not that I'm solely blaming the wives. The guys are the ones who made the decision.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:04 AM
23

"Trayvon Martin could have been my son!!!!" - Obama, inserting himself into a local crime issue to play the race card before the 2012 election "They're gonna put you in chains!!!!!!" - Biden, speaking to african-american crowds before 2012 election "War On Women! War On Women! War On Women!!!!!!! VAGINA VAGINA VAGINA!!!!!!!!" - Every Democrat on the face of the earth before the 2012 election.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:37 PM
7

She wouldn't have any chance at all if not for the kool-aid mainlined by the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:25 PM
8

It worked for Obama in 2012. Why wouldn't it work for HRC? (I don't think HRC is "inevitable" and actually think Biden would be more formidable Dem candidate. But not because I don't think identity politics works.)
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:04 PM
1

In my limited understanding, it seems like Indian men are caught between age-old traditional expectations and an extremely new, aggressive upswing in radical gender ideology.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:55 PM
2

There is certainly some truth to that, but if you look at the third-world on a case-by-case basis, often girls/women aren't treated as bad as we think and boys/men are treated much worse than we think. And in many of those societies we can't blame Feminism for that. Gynocentrism, sure.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 11:02 PM
5

Call me crazy, but I'd rather live in the United States then a place where I am forced to be a child soldier or get my hands cut off for being accused of theft.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 08:13 PM
7

Heavy metal is more popular than pop music on Spotify. Seems the genre is doing just fine. Also, there are tons of women already in heavy metal doing well. For instance, my favorite folk metal band (Arkona) is headed by a woman.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:12 PM
4

If you ever hear that, ask them if African slave owners & slave traders should also be forced to pay reparations.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:04 PM
1

Across the world, men are treated worse in non-feminist countries then they are in feminist countries.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 05:49 PM
7

Though it is high time the feminist movement meet its demise, it's not going to change society nearly as much as most MRAs seem to think. Women will just demand all the same ridiculousness and run with it under a different banner. Men will be thrown under the bus as always and told how grateful we should be to women for "seeing the light."
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:37 PM
1

When Trudeau makes it illegal for men to pee standing up, you may rethink that.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:32 PM
-4

Leftists are not now nor have they ever been open-minded. Historically, one of the first things Leftists do when they take power is kill or imprison homosexuals, intellectuals, artists and anyone else who they perceive as a threat to unquestioning obedience. Liberals, who have at least a historical legitimacy as a force for tolerance, are now allowing Leftists to claim the term Liberal because they enjoy the raw political power crazed ideologues give them.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:26 PM
1

Hey, too bad Canadians bent over and grabbed their ankles for even more feminist indoctrination by voting in Trudeau.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:04 PM
10

Well spoken as always, but North Korea will host a fair symposium on human rights before a government-owned news channel hosts a fair symposium on men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:52 PM
3

Unfortunately, it is very likely at least one prominent MRA or anti-feminist will be physically assaulted in the near future for their beliefs, & it will not be reported in the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:01 PM
1

True
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:27 PM
2

10 or so years ago, I would agree with you extreme Feminism is not the Democrat "party line." And nowadays, I would agree that many Democrats are not hardcore Feminist. The Labor movement, for instance, does not tout Feminism other than the fact that they may show up at some of the same conferences. But I don't think it's so easy to dismiss the feminist zealotry of even mainstream Democrats. Take the current example: you don't get much more mainstream than Claire McCaskill. She has always been c…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:24 PM
9

Another Democrat is pandering to feminists and mocking her male constituents. It almost seems like the Democrat party is in the thrall of feminists. But left-wing MRAs assure me otherwise so this is clearly an illusion.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:39 PM
1

"One in three men who buy this house will end up penniless and paying extortionate child support and alimony payments. Some of them end up in jail." "Dude! I am totes buying this house!"
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:44 PM
1

You know, after they've bedded dozens of thugs & players.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:39 PM
0

I didn't say that it did.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:13 PM
51

Good for you. Men need to start telling women the truth about why they are avoiding marriage. Personally, I did not go through the challenges that you did but I have witnessed similar circumstances happen to married men/men who's parents divorce. I make a good income, I'm not bad looking, I'm in my mid 30's and I'm a responsible human being so I often get people asking me why I'm not married. I politely tell them something like "I've seen what happens to men in divorce and family court proceedin…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:55 PM
1

Actually, plenty of Republicans, even pro-life Republicans, support over-the-counter birth control which is more liberal than the Democrats.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:11 PM
1

Feminism would have no political power if not for it's power in the political Left.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:10 PM
4

So calling out pandering to Radical Feminists = "ultra right wing?" For the record I am conservative/libertarian-leaning but would happily call myself a liberal if liberals hadn't sold out to the radical feminist authoritarian Left 10 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:09 PM
1

"It might be idealism on my part, but I genuinely think it's just a political ploy." Do you think it's going to stop in the off chance he was nominated or elected?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:06 PM
3

This is one reason why the MRM needs to move on from their fixation on "defeating feminism." Feminism is just a collective manifestation of female desires mixed with left-wing politics. If Feminism falls out of fashion women will just rally around some other movement and demand all the same stuff.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:18 PM
1

Good analysis, but feminists were adopting marxism before the 1970's.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:31 PM
0

It will never happen. Females are natural collectivists. They will sympathize with the feminists being made to suffer consequences and will cajole men into rescuing them. (Man's protective instinct for women being part of his nature.)
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:29 PM
4

Video rehashes all the same points we've been making for years now and continues to blame it on some Marxist conspiracy. Feminism is female nature combined with left-wing politics. If feminism goes away women will just demand all the same privilege and call it something else. I really hope the mrm is going to someday evolve beyond the "defeat feminism" meme.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 12:08 AM
12

I understand what you are saying but from what I've seen they're most afraid of former feminist women who are now anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:11 PM
2

Anita Sarkeesian got mainstream attention from day one.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:16 PM
1

It won't be taken seriously by most mainstream outlets, ever. Except to say how horrendous anyone is for suggesting men have human rights. Fox News will give it some lip service and will occasionally host anti-feminists like Suzanne Venker. Breitbart.com, which is one of the fastest-growing news websites, has a journalist who is well-schooled in men's rights issues and is regularly publishing articles on related topics.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:14 PM
19

That video backfired spectacularly, because it revealed the racism inherent in feminism. Even other feminists were calling out the racism.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:47 PM
3

The media are leftists and progressives. The american left-wing is controlled by feminists.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:44 PM
3

The media are leftists and progressives. The american left-wing is controlled by feminists.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:44 PM
37

Cassie Jaye has outraised Sarkeesian based on one Breitbart article and support from a few Gamergaters and other free-speech advocates. This is after the entire mainstream media gave Sarkeesian hundreds of millions of dollars worth of free publicity. The mainstream media is terrified of us and they should be. We don't need those fuckers. Let them die.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:00 PM
6

I have an extra pair of Patriarchy robes that I'm having my maid pick up in Vienna. You can borrow them if I can take your gold-plated hovercraft for a spin.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:39 PM
7

Excellent suggestion. By the way, I have that order of gold doubloons and jewel-encrusted monocles you called me about at the last meeting. I'll leave them over by your helicopter.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:34 PM
1

"Oh, Sherlock, you roguish genius! If only I could detect my penis from underneath my belly...."
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:29 PM
2

There is a commercial on YouTube right now with them, so that's where I got the idea from.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:27 PM
1

There already is and it's called Obamacare.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:26 PM
3

They wised up and now they're either selfish douchebags with girls all over them or MGTOW.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:26 PM
3

Good point. Although one could say those are like government checks since they serve as the enforcer.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:24 PM
3

Step 1: Do everything humanly possible to make marriage the worst financial decision a man could ever make. Step 2: Gloat triumphantly as "strong and independent" women make love with their government checks rather than a husband. Step 3: Notice that the decline in marriage did not poop as many magic unicorn rainbow ice cream cones as you thought it would. Step 4: Write articles with lecturing tones in legacy media that completely ignore or deny the reality of steps 1-3. Step 5: ????????? Step 6…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:10 PM
1

Misandry and gynocentrism are part of humanity. Feminism is those things combined with left-wing politics. Misandry and gynocentrism will never go away. Even if in the future, millions of women are pissing on the grave of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:47 PM
2

Lame.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:04 PM
5

"It will be over in 30 seconds. Just think of Benedict Cumberbach while you're doing it."
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:04 PM
-2

I want to know whether the feminist spy manual instructs their agents to dye their hair purple or wash the purple hair dye out.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:00 PM
87

Laws don't apply to women.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:58 PM
11

Why do you think Not-MRA = Feminist? Plenty of people, including me, are interested in these issues without identifying with either group.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:26 PM
10

Whenever I hear the name "David Futrelle" I imagine a room full of women with weird hair drawing straws on who's going to give him his yearly handjob.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:24 PM
2

And Feminists lapped it up like dehydrated poodles.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:09 PM
4

I have no proof to back this up but I'm wondering if Cassie has some scandalous piece of footage on a prominent Feminist that she interviewed. And that's why it's full-bore "shut Cassie down" from them.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 10:07 PM
16

I really hope Cassie Jaye is aware that David Futrelle is merely the first rain shower in what will be a hurricane of slander and lies. Feminists are going to treat her worse than how they treat Paul Elam before this is over.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:13 PM
16

Evidence #11,562 that SJWs project their own worst qualities on everybody else so they don't have to face themselves in the mirror.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:32 PM
1

Certainly
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:39 PM
27

Don't agree. Instead: "Males should never assist a female unless she is known to be a generally upstanding individual and would have your back if you needed it."
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:57 PM
1

I've always been a huge supporter of LGBT rights but unfortunately they are squandering a lot of good will with the "bake me a cake or I'll shut your business down" crap.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:14 PM
6

Both major parties have serious problems but Democrats are in the thrall of radfems at this point in history. There is some pandering to women & misandry in the GOP but nothing compared to Dems. The latter party is basically like looking through tumblr SJW blogs these days.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:32 PM
8

That's because Feminism is a manifestation of female nature. "I am unhappy therefore it is the fault of men, who need to fix it" projected society-wide. Everything else is just rationalization.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:51 PM
2

In the off chance that you're not a troll and the above is legit, complain to your local EEOC office. (Or a similar governmental office if you are not in the US)
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:12 PM
1

I had my doubts about Jaye but it looks like she is really dedicated to making an honest film. Good for her. Unfortunately, there is no bottom to how low Feminists will stoop to destroy her now. I hope she's prepared for it.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:33 PM
9

Democrat corporate & wall street donors are not going to let Sanders get nominated. Period. I know Democrats like to pretend corporations and wall street hold no sway over their party but it's simply not so. I am wrong sometimes but I don't think I'm wrong about this.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:22 PM
2

So now that Biden is scared off, and barring a legal or medical disaster, HRC WILL be the nominee and she WILL be using feminism & misandry to get elected. So what are you MRAs who identify as more left-wing going to do about it? Are you going to speak truth to power to your political circles, as right-wing MRAs have been doing for years, or are you going to go along to get along?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:50 PM
12

So now that Biden is scared off, and barring a legal or medical disaster, HRC WILL be the nominee and she WILL be using feminism & misandry to get elected. So what are you MRAs who identify as more left-wing going to do about it? Are you going to speak truth to power to your political circles, as right-wing MRAs have been doing for years, or are you going to go along to get along?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:50 PM
4

"Wage gap" is a fantastic political tool for driving female votes to left-wing politicians.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 08:00 PM
11

Unfortunately, many Gamergaters aren't willing to accept that feminists & progressive leftists are the root cause of their problems. I've been in Gamergate since the beginning and hear tons of NAFALT deflections and tone policing. Not sure what's going to have to happen for them to get it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:30 PM
3

I would flip the fuck out if my employer released my salary to everyone with my name on it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 06:45 PM
1

Interesting point, but I'm thinking of Western political systems overall, rather than just the US. Plus, feminism is heavily influenced by Marxist theory.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 06:03 PM
1

No, feminism is a manifestation of female nature mixed with left-wing politics.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:59 PM
2

I am American. When I see Democrat political activist groups lobbying Democrat politicians to shut down the SJW-ism infesting the government bureaucracy than I will believe you. All we have right now is guys like Bill Maher making a few limp-wristed finger wagglings at leftist authoritarians, while on the other hand triumphalizing his side 99.9% of the time. POTUS criticized the rampant censorship on college campuses but his administration is 100% responsible for empowering the censors. So eithe…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:34 PM
2

The MRM has been in existence for over 100 years.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:47 PM
10

You guys in the MRM better stop falling for the siren song of these conservative women. Here is the trick: "I'm not a feminist...but you better believe I would rather see my husband, son, father and brothers get their eyes gouged out with hot pitchforks than lose 1% of my female privilege."
/r/MensRights22/10/15 03:58 PM
5

That is not how a modern liberal behaves and you know it. Classical liberals, sure.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:59 PM
10

Maybe classical liberals. But there's no place for classical liberals in the modern left.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:37 PM
1

There are a few red pill / PUA types who are on the ball but most of them are immature and destructive.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:05 PM
0

While I admire Paul's spirit and think he is a fantastic writer, AVfM has their own circle jerk going on and has for awhile. It was really disappointing to see it develop over the past few years.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:04 PM
1

There are a few red pill / PUA types who are on the ball but most of them are immature and destructive.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:01 PM
4

Speaking as someone who has been around the manosphere for a really long time, the "red pill" types are way more guilty of shitting on the MRM then the other way around. That said, the MRM is fundamentally hopeless whereas some of the more mature & accomplished thought leaders in the overall manosphere are actually really helpful for men. Roll Tomassi and Mike Cernovich come to mind.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:25 PM
0

"As victories are gained for men's rights, however small or large, the fuckers who have shouted loudly against us will likely slightly reposition so that their ideology is still in control" I've watched this happen for fifteen years, and it's because feminism is not an ideology as much as it is a shapeshifting manifestation of female nature.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 02:02 PM
1

Stefan Molyneux is a utopian cult leader. The reputation of the MRM can't get any worse than it is now, otherwise I'd say he was making the MRM look bad.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:31 PM
4

I know some of you left-wing MRAs are under the illusion that Bernie represents a male-friendly progressivism but it's simply not true. Feminism is arguably the most powerful coalition in the left-wing camp and all the candidates have to genuflect if they don't want to be annihilated by female supremacists. The one exception may be the highly qualified Jim Webb, but he has no chance. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:46 PM
7

Marcotte is in battlespace preparation mode for Hillary 2016. "All women are leftist feminists or they're crazy misoginistic trolls."
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:41 PM
4

"Women being raped often report having an orgasm from it. Did she consent?" "Erections aren't voluntary. A man can have an erection against his will." "If he said 'No' or 'stop' it's rape, period." There are also cases of women using rubber bands and/or drugs to maintain a man's erection.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:51 PM
1

I'm going to guess these are young women. A lot of older women will vote for Hillary even if she bites the heads off kittens on live television.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:02 AM
4

You need to realize that feminism is a manifestation of female nature combined with left-wing politics. Even if you fight back and have some success it will simply change form and women will demand all the same bullshit. Men are alreadY second class citizens, unless they have money, stay unmarried, and don't get tangled up with women. Then they are at the top of the food chain. That is my goal now. Not fighting a losing battle for ungrateful men.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:27 PM
3

He's an extreme white knight. VAWA, Affirmative Consent, etc. and he has a problem groping and harassing women so fems have him by the balls.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:10 PM
3

I fought for over 15 years, and accomplished nothing but raising my blood pressure and becoming disgusted with humanity. It's fucking useless. I'm fairly convinced Feminism is going to be on the "out" in the next several years, maybe faster if more people fight, but it doesn't matter because women will just demand all the same shit and pathetic men will give it to them. If you want to have a miserable life, by all means follow in my footsteps.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:44 PM
7

Hillary isn't going to be the Dem nominee. Joe Biden would arguably be worse for men as president but at this point I give him at least a 50% chance.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 01:31 PM
3

http://fathers.com/wp39/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/fatherlessInfographic.pdf
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:18 AM
1

I hear you. She's not perfect but she is refreshing to be around.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:26 AM
4

Women want "choice" without any chance they will fail or get hurt or not be taken care of. Which isn't real independence.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:23 AM
7

you can doubt all you want but it's true. Prisons are full of adults who were raised in dysfunctional single mother run households. It's a leading cause of both criminality and generational poverty among every ethnic group.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:20 AM
3

Good point. Given the choice to confront her errors in judgment regarding her special womanness, they will likely choose one of the following: 1. Head in sand 2. Blame the men 3. It's not faiiiirrrrr 4. I need a man/the government to save me.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:46 PM
10

Sure, just close your eyes to the legions of juvenile delinquents being raised by single mothers that will be lifelong drags on the system. Thumbs up.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:43 PM
-1

Not sure what you're getting at but if you're saying she wants you to be a house husband, don't do it. Chances are she will start perceiving you as unmanly and want to get rid of you.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:41 PM
0

I hear you.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:40 PM
3

LOL no she's like 20 years older than me.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:40 PM
8

Some individual women are great. I just talked to a longtime female friend this morning who is a fun, fair, and logical woman teaching her daughters how to be genuinely strong adults. But the exceptions prove the rule.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:02 PM
4

It's a decent site. Better than some US counterparts. But they have trouble seeing over the blinders of their particular ideology on gender issues.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:01 PM
27

There has never been a society on the face of the planet where women, in general, have held real adult responsibility similarly to men. Many individual women have chosen to take on difficult tasks for her own betterment and the betterment of her family, and that should be applauded, but the exceptions prove the rule. The reason why both Feminism and modern "conservative woman" claptrap is a swiss cheese ideology of double standards is because women, in general, do not want to be held to the same…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:48 PM
11

The belief that women are ever going to give up their current privilege without an armageddon-level fight makes me think this woman drinks lead paint for breakfast.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:31 PM
67

This website has a series of articles that are about 75% accurate on the issues but then they conclude by telling men to "man up" and marry that unicorn snowflake woman who isn't "like that." Whether "conservative" or feminist, women will claw tooth and nail to avoid the consequences of their actions and expect men to just fix it for them.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:28 PM
1

Women want to be able to do anything they want and demand men do what they want, but we're just supposed to accept whatever.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:38 PM
1

Sample Ridiculousness: A decades-long record of covering up female rapists, female child sex predators, and female domestic abusers. / Demanding removal of due process from men accused of rape. / A decades-long record of lobbying for anti-male proceedings in family courts. / Claiming that all men are rapists. / Claiming that masculinity is poisonous. / Demanding that convicted female criminals serve no jail time. / Insisting on hundreds of billions of dollars of government funding for womens-onl…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:34 PM
5

It is highly likely that Feminism will officially be regarded a joke except among left-wing political circles. About time, and well-deserved, but it really doesn't matter. Feminism is merely a manifestation of the dark side of female nature. Women will simply keep demanding all the same ridiculous bullshit and call it something else.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:28 PM
2

Good men are invisible to many women in their "party" stage, which in this day and age can last from high school to early 30's. Women hear a constant drumbeat of how fabulous they are and how men are a bunch of useless chumps. This inflates the egos and expectations of women who don't think critically. Women also hear a constant drumbeat of "never settle for less" and are not told that their attractiveness to men drops dramatically after they are past the age of 28 or so. Because, you know, biol…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:06 PM
10

You'll notice it took a man to tie all this together and tell the truth about it, whereas the women he quotes danced around the problem. Women do not give a shit about men, most women aren't bright enough to anticipate the consequences of their actions, and few women will ever admit they deserve consequences for their actions. We could run a 2 billion dollar media campaign truthfully detailing the consequences to women wrought by gynocentrism and feminism, and their response will be 1. (head in …
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:03 PM
1

Well, Hillary Clinton is a famously bad politician who married a genius politician.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:34 PM
1

There is a rumor that Democrats did a post-election survey around the country and the feminism/SJW stuff is costing them votes. At this point they can't abandon it because it is the religion of their political base, similarly to how Republicans are dependent on evangelicals.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:11 PM
2

"As she grew, I took to bribing her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a “motorcycle chick.” Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just “relax on me.” Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl, I was trying." -Lena Dunham What if this was a man talking about his little sister? Still feel the same way?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:31 PM
0

I don't care what he does as long as it is consensual. Heaps of women say it was not consensual, and Hillary has enabled it.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:28 PM
1

Based on the statements of his accusers from the 70's and 80's, yes. Dude had a long history before Monica.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:28 PM
0

No doubt, but there are enough proven instances of his lechery that I'm going to stand by the predator statement. Plus there's the whole thing of him traveling to Jeffrey Epstein's island of underage hookers.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:24 PM
14

No personal offense to Obsidian (who I think is a great writer) but the women who need to hear this will choose cats, cupcakes, alcohol and anti-depressants over budging from their entitlement mentality towards men. And they will have the majority of media rooting for them and telling them how fabulous they are for it.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:22 PM
2

True. And Hilary's husband is a notorious sex predator and accused rapist, which Hillary has enabled for decades.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:16 AM
1

Both of the senators from TN are fairly moderate which is odd considering the reputation of the state.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:54 PM
0

I wonder what his party affiliation is? Surely it must be the one dominated by radical feminists, as I am constantly told there is "no difference" between the two parties by left-leaning MRAs.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:00 PM
1

Jared Polis may be safe but another Democrat in Colorado got beat in 2014 after running a campaign that pandered to women so much the Denver Post called him Senator Uterus.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:04 AM
3

There are hundreds of millions of Muslim men in the world and their religion directly impacts their roles in life. The above is more relevant to men's rights than a ton of other stuff I see posted.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:46 PM
0

Westerners are very busy projecting their own ignorance about Islam onto it. The religion accounts for the complimentary dynamic of the sexes.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:44 PM
2

Feminism is gender theory mixed with Marxist class theory of the oppressed and the oppressor. Gynocentrism has many adherents on the right and the left, but feminism is a political action group of the left.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:13 PM
2

So I see you have no answer to the fact that men are treated as disposable, regardless of Feminism or no feminism.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:40 PM
-1

The system we have now is entirely dependent on male disposability. The system we will have in the future will be the same. There is no way to avoid it. Some people have accepted that and now are focused on being the biggest gorillas they can be instead of begging for an equal future that will never happen.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:38 PM
4

So it's feminists telling men to rape young boys in Afghanistan? It's feminists putting AK-47's in the hands of preteens in Africa and forcing them to fight? It's feminists raping and mutilating men in said African wars? It's feminists forcing Japanese and South Korean men to work 80+ hour weeks until they're on the verge of suicide? It's feminists creating dangerous sweatshops throughout the third world and China? Add: Feminism is a pile of Marxist horsecrap. But it's a MANIFESTATION of gynocen…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:35 PM
1

Non-feminist nations around the world treat men worse than feminist nations, by and large. Explain that.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:29 PM
-1

I was an MRA for like 15 years dude. Sooner or later you will realize it's fucking futile, too.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:31 PM
-1

You're absolutely right. People who know what the score is are walking away from the MRM and either going neoreactionary or MGTOW.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:33 PM
0

It doesn't matter how many former kool-aid drinkers see the light about feminism. It doesn't matter that support for feminism is dropping like a stone around the world. It wouldn't even matter if a mob of former SJWs burned an effigy of Gloria Steinem in Times Square. Feminism is not the enemy. Female parasitism on men is the problem. As are their male toadies. Feminism is the manifestation of these phenomenon. The woman who wrote this blog post will go right on believing 99.9999999999999% of ev…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:58 PM
13

100%. But before the sexbots will come the VR sex and more realistic toys.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:22 PM
2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHahhahahaahahahaahahaha..... reads headline again HAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHahahahahhahahah
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:52 PM
3

It was truly amazing to me how fast I went from "enlightened ally" to "misogynist abuser" the very instant I started asking questions.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:14 PM
0

Men will never be treated as human beings with equal rights to women so there will always be a need for men to fight for their rights. The MRM, as presently constituted, is flawed because it still believes there is hope. There isn't, there is only a fight and constant vigilance, and that's why many long-term MRAs burn out and go MGTOW or neoreactionary.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:12 PM
1

One has to apply critical thinking every once in awhile to check. But to be honest I think many MRAs are "too" cautious. Men will never be treated as human beings with equal rights to women so there will always be a need for men to fight for their rights. The MRM, as presently constituted, is flawed because it still believes there is hope. There isn't, there is only a fight and constant vigilance, and that's why many long-term MRAs burn out and go MGTOW or neoreactionary.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:10 PM
43

I was a feminist for years. I dated several feminists and lived with an abusive feminist. I don't need to "gut check" my understanding that feminism is a supremacist hate cult; I lived it.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:51 PM
1

Text message is useless. The supporters of "affirmative consent" believe consent can be waived at any time, even retroactively. And the woman can simply claim "he forced me to send him a text."
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:40 PM
0

That's a really strained rationalization, but whatever.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:37 PM
5

Sorry, but this isn't true. Sanders went all-in on the "wage gap" war on women schtick just last week. He's drunk the kool-aid and he wants you to have some too.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:33 PM
7

The Democrat is going to run on the sex card regardless of who it is. If Hillary runs, the mantra will be "war on women." If Hillary doesn't run, the mantra will be "war on women."
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:28 PM
2

And untold hordes of Democrat men will "baaaaaa" in agreement.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:27 PM
6

"I fear the future of liberalism may be a mix of Clintonesque crony capitalism (socialism for the rich, the free market for everyone else) and hardline identity politics and political correctness. I take some solace knowing they'll have a hard time winning many elections with that mix." Excellent analysis. This is the mix that got Obama re-elected in 2012 and Congressional Democrats spanked in 2010 & 2014. I am not sure yet whether it will only work for him or Democrat's old, white fossil POTUS …
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:37 PM
6

It would end up in a whole bunch more marginalized men getting shafted by the justice system. Be they Democrat or Republican, whenever a politician wants to "get tough on crime" that translates to "I want a bunch of (primarily black) men to have their lives ruined so I can look like a hero."
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:12 PM
1

I will laugh and laugh when Feminists end up under the boot of the radical islamists they seem to like so much.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:01 PM
0

Huffpost is still a full-on loudspeaker for misandric feminism. One or two reasonable opinions occasionally don't change that.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:59 PM
17

I am shocked, simply shocked, that a politician representing the radical feminist-dominated Democrat Party doesn't give a shit about due process for men. Stop the presses.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:34 PM
2

This issue came up as a topic of conversation among my circle of friends a while ago. I very kindly made logical arguments and the women in the group literally said that men should risk going to jail in order to protect women. The white knights in the group didn't go that far, they just rejected the idea that anything could ever go wrong by trying to save a woman.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:24 PM
1

The most I will ever do for a woman in danger not personally known to me is call 911.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:21 PM
1

LOL. Don't follow the news, I see. Here's the latest political news, as reported by several major news outlets. Bernie Sanders will beat Hillary in several primaries and could beat her for the nomination. Biden, if he gets in, will most certainly win the nomination and many of Hillary $$$$ donors are ready to defect to Biden when he declares. Several GOP candidates beat Hillary in head-to-head matchups in swing states. Trump is beating Hillary in polls now and he's a complete train wreck.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:03 PM
7

I have been around the manosphere longer than most so I will agree with Dean that a lot of MGTOW jonny come lately's are misinformed about the history of MGTOW. But I do not agree that a MGTOW can coherently choose to get married and call it a MGTOW decision. I believe there is a great deal of consensus that MGTOW is a path of male self-determination that rejects gynocentric social mores. The latter part of that is why I do not believe marriage is included in the MGTOW path - marriage enforces b…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:37 PM
14

It says "We know Democrat men are a bunch of delusional vagina worshippers who would vote themselves off a cliff if we told them to."
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:32 PM
-1

Actually, it's because women in Miami's expectations for men's money, status and looks are the size of the Goodyear blimp. Plus, many women limit themselves to their own ethnic demographic because they don't want to get the evil eye from their community. (I lived in Miami for many years.)
/r/MensRights30/08/15 12:37 AM
2

The gay community has chosen to embrace big government SJWism, now they get to enjoy its punitive fruits.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:05 PM
40

Yeah, what did you expect? Congratulations, Democrats, your party is inundated with radfems and toadies desperate to appeal to them.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:59 PM
0

I appreciate him as a savvy marketer and creative guy but I don't want his "help" on any issue I advocate. I have a high tolerance for dick-swinging socons but he goes overboard.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:53 PM
1

But societies without Feminism often treat men worse than Feminist societies do, and I see scant few women objecting. This is proved historically and in the present day.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:24 AM
1

Yes, absolutely. FEMINISM IS NOT THE ULTIMATE ENEMY OF MEN. UNENLIGHTENED WOMEN (and their toady male enablers) ARE. Some second-wave feminists genuinely desired equality and WOMEN defeated them. Since then Feminists have learned their lesson and are now full-on supremacists because THAT IS WHAT MOST WOMEN WANT. Modern feminism is a construction of female desire. If feminism goes by the wayside in the future, women will simply come up with some new nonsense theory to obtain the supremacism they …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 11:21 AM
6

I just facepalmed so hard, the sound waves pushed women back into the kitchen. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 08:45 PM
3

Well I'm going to introduce another doozy into the discussion. I used to think Feminism was the enemy. It's not. Feminism is an outgrowth of female nature's dark side. When you realize that, it adds another complication. I think it's very likely that Feminism will wane as a large cultural force over the next ten years. But women (even MRA friendly women) are never going to change. They will demand all the same absurdities and dress it in a different costume, and their male lackeys will enforce i…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 11:42 AM
2

This author is just pissed men are leaving the traditionalist plantation. She couldn't care less about men except for what she wants men to do for her. Feminism is not the enemy of men. Feminism is a manifestation of the dark side of female nature. It's very important the MRM not lose sight of that. It is very possible Feminism will go by the wayside in the next ten years. Women will still demand all the absurdities they demand now, but call it something else. It's good to fight feminism but don…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:20 PM
1

It says...SHUT UP SHITLORD RAPE ENABLER!!!!!! Lol
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:03 PM
1

Law enforcement is financially incentivized by feminists in the government to never consider that. Similarly to how they get money for turning a blind eye to abusive wives.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 01:01 PM
1

I don't know if Jezebel ever said it but the propaganda in the 1970s - 1990s was that women never lie about rape. Now the propaganda has shifted to "only rarely" which is an unproven claim.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:59 PM
1

But before that he was an active collaborator and supporter of these same feminists.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:49 PM
1

The legal precedence is concerning. For sure.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:48 PM
-1

Are we supposed to feel sorry for a supporter of radical feminism who then gets radical feminismed on? I feel sorry for his sons, who obviously have a dad who despises his own gender but I don't feel sorry for him. Fuck him.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 12:47 PM
6

I am very concerned about the legal precedent being set, but I couldn't care less about him. I've been speaking out on these issues for over half my life now and I have literally no empathy left for people who actively work against the rights of half the human race.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:57 PM
1

Male feminist gets what he deserves. But obviously the precedent being set is very concerning.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:02 PM
4

It's good she didn't point the finger at anyone specifically but this still misuses police resources and adds to man-hating culture.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:37 PM
2

Sanders is already getting slapped around by black activists, the last thing he is ever going to do is come out and challenge left-wing femifascism.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:32 PM
2

Yes, I'm sure Bernie Sanders will happily invite the wrath of the gender warriors in charge of the American political left. That will happen.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:35 PM
2

In the near future, it is very likely that Feminism will be regarded as thoroughly toxic, but women and their male toadies will still demand all the same gynocentrism they do now. That's why many long-time MRAs are leaving the movement and going MGTOW or neoreactionary.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:50 PM
1

The only woman I've ever heard of who could even conceive of writing that, let alone actually write that, is Girl Writes What. And that piece is actually a more masculine writing style then hers. That's not to say women are dumb, it's to say that such capacity for self-reflection and causality is rarely found.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:56 PM
1

Nah. This craziness is only getting started.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:24 PM
6

If you believe that a woman wrote that, I have a spectacular bridge to sell you in the NYC area. Give you a great deal. That aside, the comment has some truth to it and it's the reason why enlightened men need to be less focused on simply "defeating feminism" and open their minds to the greater dangers of women.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:08 PM
1

Well we are talking about elite support for Feminism here, so I'm not sure how far I want to get off track. But the first part of your response contains some assertions that I do not believe are true: "In fact in general the elites around the world have pushed for austerity and more austerity, which is the exact opposite of this economic theory, and is known to deepen recessions. Look at Greece for example." False. The industrialized world has a large and growing social welfare system. Austerity…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:33 PM
5

It was a good piece.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:15 PM
-1

To put it bluntly, men are the producers and savers, women are the parasites and consumers. Any money & power the ruling class gives to women, whether she makes it for herself or through leeching off men/the government, they are likely to get back much easier then if they let men make that money. Patriarchy forced the men to work and women to parasite off their husbands. The corporate feminist matriarchy we have now forces both women and men to work, while also increasing women's ability to para…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:13 PM
43

Informed speculation on my part: Nightclubs profit center is essentially grabbing men by the ankles, hanging them upside down, and shaking until money comes out. If a sexually active young man is even slightly aware of the manosphere or red pill communities, he knows nightclubs are a tough place for pickup. If a man is in any way limiting his sexual interactions with women, nightclubs are a ludicrously expensive activity. So on one side, men interested in sex are getting more "bang for their buc…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:06 PM
10

It may have been illegal but it was common and tolerated up until the early part of the 20th century. Cities all over the country had red light districts and brothels. Out west, many of the first "frontier women" were brothel owners and sex workers in mining, logging and shipping towns. That's why I laugh whenever right-wing female politicians portray themselves as "strong frontier women." Many early frontier women were not building log cabins, they were laying on their backs.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:27 PM
11

Pro sex work vs anti sex work is one of the real conflicts between feminist camps. I believe the antis are going to win unfortunately because they are in bed with the government.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 11:23 AM
35

Attention everyone: I work in the media and I am going to emphasize that none of you talk to the media unless the interviewer is known to you as sympathetic. As of right now the only professional journalists that talk about gender I would ever talk to are Cathy Young, Robby Soave and Ashe Schow. 85% of the media, especially TV is written for women's entertainment. They are the primary target for advertisers and they are far more likely to watch television then men. Most women want to witness dra…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:55 PM
1

Well he already gave Steinem a Medal of Honor so that was like foreplay anyway.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:55 PM
10

Certainly when it comes to a felony, they should report to law enforcement and cooperate with any investigation. I don't have as much of a problem with campus tribunals/campus security investigating stuff like plagiarism or misdemeanor-type crimes.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:54 PM
8

Libertarians want to take over the world and then let you pretty much do anything you want with your life. Those assholes. ;)
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:59 PM
22

Republicans are no panacea, but Democrats are two peas in a pod with radical feminists. Especially with the current White House administration run by Jarrett. There are some non-politician Democrats who are on the right side of this issue but I would not recommend holding your breath that any politician Democrat is going to take up the cause until there is a very clear public outcry. If they are going to speak out they need to know that their constituents will have their back when the feminists …
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:48 PM
2

He will veto it while performing cunnilingus on Gloria Steinem.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:04 PM
5

Republicans have majority in both house and senate. Unfortunately there are plenty of retarded gynocentric republicans so who knows what will happen.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:04 PM
17

I agree, but they are doing this to try to balance whatever monstrosity comes out of the Senate.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:17 PM
4

I see him as primarily a provocateur and certainly some stuff he does is infuriating. But I applaud 75% of it.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:44 PM
6

Paul Elam is not the leader of the MRM and it is perfectly ok to think he is a dumbass. Even he doesn't care if you think he's a dumbass. He'd tell you to get off your rear and get to work and prove how your way is better than his.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:43 PM
0

Because men's rights and feminism are political issues. It's irrational for someone who says they support men's rights to turn a blind eye to the fact one political party in the united states is run by radical feminists. I am perfectly willing to acknowledge the GOP is not good on men's rights, and I am working very hard to change their perspective. But despite faults they are a far cry from the Democrats who are completely in the thrall of the worst elements of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:44 PM
24

For a couple years there was a huge spate of articles like this but they kind of dried up after men handed their asses back to them in the comments section and on social media. The feminist media would rather stop talking about an issue than tell the truth. The British press seems to be covering it more now, with MGTOW & the Marriage Strike being covered on British TV and magazines.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 01:21 PM
14

It's really unfortunate millions of college-age males will keep voting for radical feminist enablers, regardless of what they do.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:54 PM
2

I follow dozens of feminist sex worker rights activists on Twitter who don't fit that description. In fact most of them support total decriminalization rather than just legality and regulation. Which is even further out there then i would go. Many "anti's" support the Swedish model or similar which fits what you describe.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:59 PM
4

There are lots of feminists for sex workers rights. It's one of the few nice things I can give feminists credit for. Acknowledged many are against as well.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:54 PM
2

I don't doubt a woman might say this, but this comes across as possibly faked.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:52 PM
2

Just pee all over the seat.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:22 PM
14

Few things make me despair for my gender more than willing cuckolds.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:20 PM
4

I agree but the feminists that have the Democrats by the balls give zero fucks.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:16 PM
3

Great stuff as always, but the MRM still seemingly hasn't come to grips with the fact it is 1. female selfishness & solipsism 2. male pussy-worship that are the problems. Feminism is just a manifestation of it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:11 PM
4

Ha ha. Good luck getting the hard-left feminist apparatchiks at PBS to take that complaint seriously.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:03 PM
2

They may use that reasoning to justify alimony, but if that was really the reason alimony existed, alimony would be calculated by totaling up hours doing housework and then paying whatever the housekeeper fee would be. Alimony is the state's way of ensuring Princess never has to actually deal with the "equal treatment" she claims to want so much.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:31 PM
3

Yeah I hear you. I was kind of playing a thought experiment. I also think marriage should be shunned. A main reason being the worldview of many women is "husband = servant."
/r/MensRights13/07/15 06:55 PM
1

Or contributes equally in other ways. I don't expect my hypothetical SO to make as much money as me but she'd better bring equal contributions.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:31 PM
29

I'm really glad you dumped her when you did and that you're smart enough to not take her back. This kind of behavior will increase among women as 1. The available pool of attractive men willing to commit drops & 2. Female-centric pop culture continues to inflate women's heads. I had an ex tell me, years after we broke up, that she was resigned to the fact that she was never going to find a man as ambitious and high-potential as me. She is now engaged to a part-time chef, and there's nothing wron…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:14 PM
3

Telling people what they want to hear is a multi-trillion dollar industry and a profitable subset is telling overweight women what they want to hear. Men are just as susceptible to magical thinking as women, but we don't happen to throw our money at people telling us being fat is ok. Speaking as someone who could stand to lose about 15 pounds, I'm actually glad there's not a subculture telling men lies and flattery about "big and beautiful."
/r/MensRights11/07/15 09:58 PM
1

MALE TEARS
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:06 PM
17

The history of the world is the history of dead males. Dose oppressed women tho.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:04 PM
3

Wrong. Paternity leave hurts employees without children, or employees who's children are older. Employers are not going to lose money or productivity, regardless of what regulations they have to meet. They will pass the cost on to their employees with lower wages and higher demands.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:52 PM
46

If that bakes your noodle, just consider the fact that no one gives a shit about the lives of men.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:50 PM
1

Because a new regulation does not change human nature that has developed over millions of years. Due to female sexual preferences, men are valued for their wealth and power. Men who go to "daddy day care" mode are putting themselves in a position where their career will be detrimentally affected and their wife is likely to lose attraction to them. Families where the wife is the primary breadwinner are frighteningly common to end in divorce. This happens all the time. So much so, divorce lawyers …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:24 PM
9

At the end of the day, men are still primarily valued as protectors and providers. Not fathers. And this is far more due to female sexual selection than it is "evil employers." Politics is downstream from culture and when women start valuing devoted dads over cads and rich, successful men, things will change.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:55 PM
1

What could go wrong? :P
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:32 PM
1

Yeah the concept of "anarchist feminism" has brought about many lulz over the years for me.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:32 PM
4

BURN THE WITCH! CLIMATE DENIER!!!! BOOO! SAVE US FROM THE DENIER!!!!!!
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:48 PM
3

Feminists are infiltrating Libertarianism in the US, too. She's less active now but some woman named Cathy Reisenwitz kicked up a huge fuss several months ago about how Libertarianism was all about white male misogynist privilege and had to embrace Feminism to evolve.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:47 PM
1

It's not one person - it's an entire company that my company is a vendor for. They have thousands of employees and many are veterans of the armed services and/or active members of the national guard. They are mostly blue-collar positions but it is a very well-respected company.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:13 PM
2

This is true in some cases but not others. One of my clients is a Fortune 500 company that actively recruits veterans and even offers special programs for their training.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:29 PM
1

I didn't hear about that. I just know from friends who work in Hollywood he has a bad rep.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:59 PM
2

The MGTOW thing was a little strange. Whatever MGTOW once meant ten years ago it has a different meaning now and logically can't encompass men who choose to marry. I think MGTOW has some good married male allies, and that's great, but it should be pretty obvious that MGTOW as it is presently constituted cannot encourage men to go ahead and marry.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:28 PM
4

I am going to bust out laughing for about two weeks straight when women realize men are going to abandon them for new sex technologies. Robo boyfriend may give her a good orgasm but he won't be paying any of her bills.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:00 PM
1

I didn't say Sex and the City was feminist.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 11:13 AM
7

This is true. Her husband has a reputation too.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:54 AM
22

Sarah Jessica Parker brainwashed and destroyed several generations of women with Sex and the City's vapid hyperconsumerist "you go girl" culture. She's no more a humanist than I am a popsicle.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:53 AM
1

I once thought that but the beyond-retarded "Spank A Feminist" thing was Dean's doing.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:08 PM
2

The regulars on that site are steeped in kool-aid and viciously attack anyone who questions their lord and savior. It is pathetic and I find myself visiting the website less and less.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:07 PM
1

Huh? AVfM was growing at a good clip before Dean ever came along. I mostly think Dean is a positive force, too, but AVfM is the intellectual property of Paul. Not to diminish the amount of effort Dean pours into it.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:59 PM
4

Some of Paul/AVfM's tactics are so obnoxiously stupid it boggles the mind, but on balance, Paul is a positive figure. We actually need "not nice" people as standard-bearers because "nice" has never worked on these issues. I would not call him a shining light, though, and I don't even think he would want that characterization.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:10 PM
3

Yeah especially as a man. I cheer the trend of women putting off marriage until they're in their late 20's because that will ensure more men get to the age where they start thinking more clearly about women.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:25 PM
1

YOU DON'T SAY. Shocking.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:22 PM
1

Do you think people who would reject her entirely because of her views on the climate would ever be open to feminist-critical arguments in the first place?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:49 PM
3

Views on the climate have nothing to do with Men's Rights. You sound like you're accusing her of an Orwellian thought crime.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:43 PM
3

Yeah, cool. Again, much respect for her. Both for her ideas and for her status as a trailblazer.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:41 PM
5

Huge fan of Paglia, whom I promote often on social media. But Paglia supports traditional gender roles that demand male self-sacrifice. She has written glowingly of the glory of men marching off to war, dangerous jobs, or other activities in which they are expected to die for women. If she gained more influence we would definitely be rid of feminism's excesses, and men would get more appreciation, but we would still be expected to sacrifice for the aid & comfort of women.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:58 PM
14

It doesn't matter how many women denounce feminism. What matters is how many women are genuinely willing to seek gender equality. Which scant few will ever want, because they fear the loss of female privilege. I really hope the men's movement is smart enough to call BS on the coming scenario of "feminism" being re-branded as something less negative by women who supposedly dislike feminism so much.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:56 PM
2

Definitely. And libertarian feminists should be challenged on that point.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:11 AM
3

Yeah. It's an actual variant of libertarianism. One of my friends ID's as such.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:15 PM
1

One of the guys in charge of the Cato Institute said it wasn't possible to be a libertarian and not be a feminist, but in the essay he narrowly defined feminism as equal rights and equal opportunity. Horrendously naive, of course. But simplistically, he's not wrong.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:34 PM
3

Thanks. I don't think we should question people for calling themselves feminists, because then when a full-on man-hating cultist rad fem says some bigoted garbage, we can point at her and go "Hey, she calls herself a feminist. She must be one. What say you, fellow feminists?"
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:17 PM
1

Thus, why I think it's verging on utopianism as I said earlier in the thread.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:13 PM
1

If you read Moyer's essay he very clearly points out that this is a future potentiality possibly contingent on the elimination of scarcity. He is not saying "end property rights now."
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:53 PM
3

Left-libertarianism & libertarian-socialism are distinct points of view. I don't agree with them. I think they're utopian. But I'm not going to go claim no such ideas could ever happen.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:41 PM
9

She is a libertarian and identifies as a feminist. There are some feminists who do. I think the concept of libertarian feminism is ludicrous because of the amount of state coercion & $$$ feminism requires to stay propped up but I'm not in the business of telling people what they can & can't call themselves. Certainly if I thought it would do any good, I'd try to persuade a libertarian feminist it's a contradiction. Other than the concept of equal rights & equal opportunity, which is highly compa…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:19 PM
1

To be fair both major parties heart orgiastic government spending.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:11 PM
8

In the future, women without jobs will be given an array of options. Men without jobs will be welcome with open arms by the prison industrial complex or dark alleyways.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:58 PM
5

I am a huge advocate for gay rights, an atheist, and in support of a wise and cautious foreign policy. I'm welcomed by the vast majority of people on the Right I meet. Even many of the anti-gay marriage Bible bangers. You let me know how you would fare among most left-wing social circles if you expressed advocacy for men's rights or against feminism.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:33 PM
6

I giver her serious credit for her honesty throughout the piece.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:27 PM
-3

I get the appeal of economic populism. But beyond that, what does the left offer other than a bunch of people screaming that men & white people are the cause of all that's wrong with the world? Classical liberalism & left-libertarianism are the only two subgroups of the left that are not dominated by social justice warriors, and they are both vanishingly small.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:42 PM
2

It never ceases to amaze me how left-wing MRAs can look at this absurdly biased radical feminist pandering and continue to think it's perfectly alright to keep propping up this area of the political sphere with their support.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:11 PM
4

The article is better than average but that doesn't mean it's good.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:17 PM
1

I mostly agree but if women abandon feminism and start demanding traditionalism the Right will happily throw the collars on men for the votes. So don't get too cozy, lol.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:13 PM
7

We could ask 1,000,000 women that question and the most coherent answer we're ever going to get is "Because he should." There is a strong evolutionary and societal basis for women's impenetrable faith that men "should/will just do ___ or they're not a man."
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:44 PM
4

Neither the Right or the Left are "good" for men but the Right is slightly more amenable for sure. By the way, KC Johnson (the guy in the interview) is a Democrat.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:09 PM
4

That's a fair point. Maybe I'm being too optimistic but it could be she knows the pendulum is shifting on gender politics and is trying to mark her territory ahead of time. I like KC Johnson and retweet him regularly on Twitter.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:19 AM
1

"But..but...Fox News is teh satan..." bleat the prog sheep.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:02 PM
5

It really doesn't matter how crazy they get. Feminism is not the challenge facing men and true gender equality. Women and their male lackeys are. If they decide feminism is no longer a useful tool to get what they want they will just discard the label and dress it up as chivalry or whatever.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:33 PM
4

Outwardly they will shriek about misogyny but inwardly they will be delighted they can maintain the illusion that wealthy liberal white women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:12 PM
2

I agree with you that the shaming and traditional gender expectations are wrong. But sexual health is an important component of physical health and psychological health for both men and women.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 12:00 PM
3

I remember what a huge hurdle it was to imagine having sex before I lost my virginity in my late teens. After that, I was like "oh ok that's over." It still took me a little while to get good at relating with women but success sort of snowballed. These guys should consider getting an escort. A lot of non-intercourse sex services are legal in Japan and I can't imagine its hard to find an escort who will go all the way. After that "first time" they may find it less of a mental challenge.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:58 AM
1

Yeah that's my thought as well. But I think he is observant enough to realize most of us are not interested in a return to tradcon values.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:04 AM
1

A few years ago, this particular blogger dismissed anti feminism with a wave of his hand. Now his blog is anti-feminism like 24/7. I can't decide yet if he is genuine or if he's realized it's really good for page views. Maybe both.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 12:04 AM
4

No, they don't deserve our salute. "Thank you for not being outrageous bigots." Give me a fucking break.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:49 PM
0

Yes and no. Yes: the men's rights movement generally embraces equal opportunity and for people to live how they wish, so long as they're not hurting others. No: "FTBY&M" presented an unscientific "blank slate" ideology on gender and sex differences. It came from an era where postmodern left-wing ideologues rejected human biology and had decided that males and females were indeed just a different set of holes and members that are then shaped by society. Which is clearly, obviously wrong. Unfortun…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:43 PM
1

Feminism does not = women. Women can vote for whoever they want, it doesnt make a party feminist simply because women vote for it. Feminism is a product of left-wing political thought. Gynocentrism is a problem with both the right and the left. I will agree that UK conservatives are gynocentric and have some feminist sympathies to cozy up to feminist interest groups for votes.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:59 AM
1

Well, I'm something like a classical liberal but that makes me a libertarian or a moderate conservative these days since left-wing parties have become anti-liberal bastions of Marxist identity politics.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:04 PM
1

A servant walking tall and proud about his servitude is still a servant.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:27 AM
1

There are hundreds of millions of graves filled with bones from the men who were thrown into a meat grinder to serve the equality you speak of. If that's what you want, fine, but I'll pass.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:25 AM
2

Men have been exploited by women for our gentlemanly behavior. Not feminism. Women. And that's why we need to stop giving them special treatment.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:55 AM
2

I disagree. I think chivalry has to be taken out behind the barn and shot until it stops twitching. Notions of chivalry are fundamentally opposed to any kind of equal rights for the sexes. Chivalry enforces male disposability and female non-agency. So long as notions of chivalry exist, men are always going to get the short end of the stick. Feminism and traditionalism are two sides of the same coin.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:06 PM
1

On another thread, I got down voted for saying Sommers demands chivalry so I'm just posting this here.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:55 PM
1

http://youtu.be/medVCq8eWPk If link doesn't work, go on YouTube and search "chivalry and feminists Sommers"
/r/MensRights22/05/15 10:47 PM
2

Yeah, even Sommers doesn't believe that though. She's an advocate of chivalry in the male-female dynamic. Edit: I can't believe I'm getting down voted by people white knighting for Sommers after I effusively praised her. Anyway, here's Sommers advocating for chivalry. http://youtu.be/medVCq8eWPk If link doesn't work search "Chivalry and Feminism Sommers"
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:12 PM
19

Though I think Sommers is mistaken for believing Feminism is worth salvaging, she is absolutely gold for those of us who advocate for equal rights in real life.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:05 PM
1

A good example of how conservatives and feminists team up to promote gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:37 PM
1

1.Political bias, as you pointed out. 2. Political correctness 3. Women are the primary consumer spenders, thus media falls all over themselves to please women and the companies that want to advertise to women. 4. Women are the primary consumers of mainstream media. Men, in general, consume far less mainstream media sources, especially TV. This has been the case for years.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:43 PM
3

Content creators can make the content they want, and consult with the people they want. We, alternatively, can choose not to watch it, watch it and criticize it, or even ridicule it if we want. Frankly I think the Eve "Good Rape" Ensler criticism is a solid point. That all said, it was fucking embarrassing seeing men go all up in arms about "feminist Mad Max" without even seeing the movie. I just read Aaron Clarey's article on it and the Eve Ensler thing was one solid point among many poorly rea…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:43 AM
1

Sen. Warren is the new messiah in the eyes of the progressive Left. Why does Sen. Brown have to white knight for her? And the idea that Obama, the most feminist-friendly president ever is somehow scornful of women in his own party is ridiculous. Juvenile gender politics at the highest level of government.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:37 PM
1

That's not an applicable comparison. This woman identified as a Feminist for thirty years without ever looking into whether it actually meant what it professed to mean. I identified as a feminist for about 3 years, and then ran away from it as fast as I possibly could when I looked into whether it actually fought for gender equality. I don't have access to any more knowledge than she did.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:00 PM
2

So you're making excuses for people blindly accepting what they are told without bothering to verify?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:55 PM
3

Hooray! Hopefully more men will get utterly annihilated by the courts so their female counterparts will be inspired to stop looking at the world from vagina-colored glasses!
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:28 PM
7

Because women subconsciously or consciously percieve men as their natural servants, wallets and burly protectors. MGTOW rejects this, we're rapidly growing, and there's basically nothing that anyone can do about it short of the government conscripting men into marriage by force.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:58 PM
1

All true
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:57 AM
10

The Honey Badger name & branding were all over the materials the comic con printed up - both in print and on the website for the event. TB registered the group as Honey Badgers. Was completely up front about everything. As demonstrated by all the materials they printed up for her use at the conference. If I was on a basketball team with co-workers called the "Lobster Boys" and registered for a tournament I would probably use my work email, which does not say lobster boys. That doesn't mean I was…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:02 AM
5

Yes. I am a vocal fan of Feminists like Camille Paglia and Christina Hoff-Sommers. Promote them often on other social media networks. Both of them, by the way, are portrayed as heretics, witches, and misogynist threats against women by the modern Feminist movement.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:08 PM
3

Hillary is less of a strident feminist than most leading Democrats. You're going to get Feminist laws & policies put in place if a Democrat wins, regardless of which democrat it is. Republicans are shitty on men's issues, but they generally reject Feminism (besides the conservative traditionalist variety). Democrats are two peas in a pod with Feminists.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:44 PM
2

It will be fun to see the feminist rationalization hamsters spin when it turns out a bunch of women want sex robots too.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:12 PM
20

Feminism is a special interest group primarily fighting for the interests of affluent liberal white women. There is no common ground to be fond until the minority of genuine equality-minded feminists clean out their movement. I fight feminism because I support equality.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:33 PM
1

Well, I don't know that I would characterize it as an editorial position of the WP. They cover a broad range of news & opinion and this is an article their editors chose to publish. Reality is, marriage ----> stable families -----> stable societies so it is seen as a "good" by a wide range of special interest groups. Of course, they don't seem to know or care that it is an absolute disaster for men to marry. But again, as I said above, men are expected to "do their duty." Only women are allowed …
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:41 PM
2

I AM NOT A LAWYER but if she is holding him against his will this is against the law and you should call the cops. If he is consenting to his "confinement" there's not much you can do. This is true regardless of what he did or didn't do.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:22 PM
1

Whatever whispers of sanity have manifested, have been blasted over by an increasingly loud Feminist bullhorn powered by the media and left-wing political groups. A few balanced articles on gender issues is not a "180 degree turnaround."
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:11 PM
8

"Please remember that Men's Rights are about bringing light to the often forgotten and ignored issues that men face on a day to day basis simply because of their gender. We, as men, should not aim to become victims. We are not built to be victims." We cannot accomplish the first goal without occasionally violating the second. I totally get "don't wallow in victimhood" but "we are not victims" sounds like a nice way to say "man up." "It should be common knowledge by now that we, who form the gene…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:13 PM
3

My guess: Because he works at an organization focused on encouraging marriage, and is genuinely concerned with societal decline and correctly identifies the decline of marriage as a factor. There is no snowball's chance in hell he is going to get articles published in WaPo chiding women for being amoral mercenaries or proclaiming Feminism's deliberate corrupting of divorce law. Remember, basically nobody in the world gives a shit about what men want. We are expected to serve.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:12 PM
7

This is the "carrot" of the carrot and stick approach. The stick being "Peter pan man baby won't grow up" and so forth.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:40 PM
3

Precisely.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:37 PM
7

I have corresponded with this writer. Nice guy. He is well aware of the slaughterhouse of divorce courts as well as the other reasons men aren't getting married. Has written some previous articles on it as well. An astute commenter in this thread said marriage is being "sold" - this is precisely correct. This is the sales pitch of a marriage salesman.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:36 PM
1

Translation: "I'm too much of a coward to call out the radical feminists that dominate the political left, and I'd prefer you stop pointing it out."
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:38 PM
4

Internet & social media is helping this one. Feminism, like all religions, flourishes from authoritarian top-down control and withers when it's exposed to actual scrutiny. Feminism in universities and government is basically untouchable, but they are highly vulnerable on turf that doesn't shelter them from dissent.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:57 PM
11

Feminism is getting pushback because more women are realizing that the toxicity of Feminism is scaring men away from being women's unquestioning workhorses.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:30 PM
13

All I ask is that you honestly criticize both sides when they are wrong. I am an MRA who leans right. Me and many of my fellow right-wing mras criticize conservatives constantly on these issues, just as we do liberals when they are wrong. I look at left-wing MRAs and most of what I see is weak equivocations, rationalizing, hypersensitivity, and sputtering about "nonpartisanship." You can be a liberal or a leftist and still be for men's rights but you can't give a pass to your "team" when they ar…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:20 PM
3

"Third Wave Feminism" is a left-wing political action group. It's literally impossible to fully criticize the former without pointing out the latter.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:46 PM
7

I agree with you somewhat but I am becoming vey dismayed at MRAs on the Left's willingness to put up with this stuff. I, personally, am in disagreement with the GOP almost as much as I am Democrats. But I'm willing to call out both sides. Many MRAs who are way more right-wing than me are willing to call out both sides too. I've been around the MRM for a long time and I believe that left-wing MRAs are using the "nonpartisan" excuse to avoid rocking the boat.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:43 PM
7

Feminism is the left-wing political action committee of gynocentrism. Gynocentrism is a human characteristic rooted in biology. If people are only getting offended by Feminism (and I agree many people are like that) then they are not seeing the whole problem.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:37 PM
1

I think you really have to stretch the truth to claim that video was all about traditional conservatism. The one self-described tradcon out of the four (guy with glasses) even said he would not get married if he were a young man today.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:30 PM
1

I think you really have to stretch the truth to claim that video was all about traditional conservatism. The one self-described tradcon out of the four (guy with glasses) even said he would not get married if he were a young man today.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:30 PM
15

You're not taking into account the aggressive stance the current Democrat Party is taking against men. All the recent policies criminalizing male sexuality have come out of the Democrat White House.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:50 PM
1

Yes they should, but don't tell that to left-wing MRAs who are still under the delusion they can vote for the left without castrating themselves.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:37 PM
27

I agree with every word, except that you omitted to mention that 95% of these people are all politically-connected Democrats. I agree that men's rights is best as a nonpartisan issue but we also must not fail to pinpoint that Democrats have a target painted on men's backs. I know I will get blowback from liberals for saying this but i don't care. If you're a man, the GOP doesn't do much for you but at least they don't hate you. If you're a man, there is no place for you in the Democrat Party exc…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:21 PM
2

There is a page online that lists over 200 peer-reviewed studies showing gender symmetry in DV. I'm on my phone so I can't find it easily but I'll post it here tomorrow if someone doesn't share it beforehand.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:34 AM
2

They're riding the crest of the wave generated by the ascendancy of the Authoritarian Left (distinct from Liberal Left) in Western society. Their political coalition currently has the upper hand in government, media, and academia so they are exploiting it to full advantage. They are going to get much worse, especially if left-wing political parties keep winning elections. Frankly we will look back on these feminists as "kind & gentle" in 15 years. The Authoritarian Left wants full control of soc…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:39 PM
1

They actively edited it to edit out white people. According to all the mainstream media articles I read on it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:24 PM
4

I think catcalling is rude, but this video is racist as hell. It looks like something KKK sympathizers would make to stir up trouble. Videomakers specifically targeted underprivileged minorities for shame & ridicule. Edited video to do so, in fact.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:04 PM
1

I disagree. If Feminism eats enough of their own (especially "male allies") their ideology will become a circular firing squad and will fracture their coalition.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:27 PM
1

I agree, I hope they metaphorically annihilate this guy.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:19 PM
1

Whether or not he is using his SJW pandering to seduce women doesn't really matter to me. I'm mainly just hoping he suffers as much as he'd have other men suffer in a similar situation.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:55 PM
1

Honestly, I hope feminists metaphorically execute this guy as viciously as they possibly can. I don't want him to be treated fairly, I want him to be treated exactly as how he'd have other men treated in a similar situation.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:53 PM
9

Yup. Its nice to see. I also welcome the many feminist voices that have chimed in on the pro-GamerGate side.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:09 PM
2

Disagree. The GOP has a lot of problems with idealizing women and throwing men under the bus. The Democrats are that way, plus they are fully interconnected with Feminism, especially through their activist base. If you wanted to make the case that some groups within the Democratic Party may be open to men's issues, I agree completely. Just like some GOPers are open to it. But neither political party can win if they alienate their activist base, and Feminism is at the very core of Democrats activ…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:14 PM
11

No lie, I literally jumped out of my chair and pumped my fists in the air after i read that.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:58 PM
1

I would have supported women's rights. I would not have supported first-wave feminists, because they were racists, white supremacists, and eugenicists. Add: It's really important to remember one can support women's rights without supporting Feminism. Feminism doesn't even support women's rights.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:01 AM
1

Thanks. That's the point I'm trying to make. I can argue against gynocentrists on the Right & Left as much as I want but people on the Left will just write me off as a lunatic dittohead or whatever. (Even though I'm quite amenable to some progressive issues.)
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:09 PM
2

That's a great point, but that was previous generations of women who reacted that way. Modern young women are so fully steeped in the Kool-aid they will probably accuse wary men of being "afraid of a strong woman."
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:05 PM
-1

I understand and agree mostly, and I think we should stay non partisan too. But my frustration is that Right-leaning MRAs have been criticizing the gynocentrists on the Right for years, and we've been making headway. While on the other hand, Left-leaning MRAs seem to still mostly be in go along-get along mode. Whether you like it or not, the modern Feminist movement is wholly funded and empowered by Democratic Party. I acknowledge the Right has problems, too, as I mentioned above.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:18 PM
4

To be fair, there are some Republicans supporting this bill as well. But the lionshare of support is coming from the left.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 11:24 AM
8

Agreed, but Ezra Klein is a man. PS Democrats can never tell Feminism to reform or go away. Feminism is one of the most powerful constituencies in their party.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:44 AM
14

Speaking as someone who has worked with the ACLU in the past, in recent years they have sold out to Democrat & feminist political operatives. They are a hack political advocacy group now.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:25 AM
2

Completely disagree. The "War on Women" rhetoric came about in Obama's first term and will be even worse should Hillary be elected. Anytime anyone disagrees with a word she says, this will be decried as a war on women and Feminists will descend on the offender with switchblades in hand. Remember we got VAWA during the Clinton administration which Hillary played a hand in.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:28 PM
19

To be blunt, this idiocy will stop when Democrats start paying a political price for pandering to Feminists.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 07:41 PM
-5

Women are not to be trusted in this day and age. There's nothing dangerous about your realization. It's smart.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:01 PM
2

Because only men commit domestic violence?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:28 AM
7

"Zounds! This demonic protrusion above the right temple indicates a penchant for lady-choking and Fox News viewership!"
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:21 AM
1

Thanks to whoever added the tag. Forgot this time.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:19 AM
4

Tell your girlfriend if she is going to support the cause of female chauvinist pigs she can find another boyfriend and another place to live. I'm dead serious. She is deliberately disrespecting you and the sacrifices you have made for her, and now she needs to find someone else willing to take care of her. Stand up for yourself. Good luck.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:40 PM
2

Many feminists are ok. Feminism is a supremacist hate cult. The feminists who aren't hateful supremacists are providing aid and comfort to those who are. Feminism doesn't even support most women. It is a special interest group primarily interested in empowering bigots and advancing the lifestyles of affluent white women who vote for left-wing political parties.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:33 PM
2

Many feminists are ok people who have gotten suckered into a supremacist hate cult. They need to realize that for there to be any real progress. But that doesn't mean we can't work with each other when possible. I identify as an advocate for human rights and civil liberties rather than as an MRA and that helps.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:51 PM
-1

Feminism is a vile supremacist hate movement. Why would you want to identify as one?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:59 PM
1

True. Good way to put it.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:51 PM
5

William Price over at The Spearhead predicts that, at least in the US, the Democrats will start to prioritize racial politics over gender politics in the future.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:51 PM
6

I am not holding my breath. I think Feminism is so powerful within the Left's coalition, they will basically be able to keep calling the shots unless organized labor really puts their foot down.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:44 PM
9

Feminism is fully entrenched in the Left's political machine, but there are many people on the Left who aren't Feminist. Organized Labor, other than in education, is not feminist. The black and hispanic coalitions are not very feminist. They may be chivalrous and gynocentric, but we have that garbage happening on the Right as well.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:42 PM
0

I disagree. In most functioning societies throughout history, men have protected women and sought their best interest. Men also enforced certain codes of behavior towards women.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:45 PM
14

Feminists are putting a strain on the Left's political coalition, and would probably break it completely if non-feminist people on the left were more aware of the issues.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:42 PM
6

This is correct. Men should regard women with deep suspicion, because most women certainly couldn't care less about "fair" when it comes to men.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:56 PM
3

TIME has published Sommers before, as well as Paglia.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:47 PM
2

You are right to have the feeling because that is absolutely correct. I am guardedly optimistic that the growth of the men's movement will be egalitarian rather than traditionalist, but make no mistake, untold millions of people are perfectly content to making men the servants of women, feminism or not.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:38 PM
4

This article and some of the comments are a good reminder that anti-feminist does not equal pro-male in any way, shape, or form. In the future as women become more outspoken against feminism, what will follow will be a plea for the return to chivalry, and our response must be "hell no."
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:32 PM
1

So among all the million billion zillion men's issues worldwide a tiny handful of MRAs are trying to manage, we should dedicate hundreds of thousands of dollars to California men who are too stupid and lazy to lift a finger on their own behalf. GTFOH.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:21 PM
3

Many of us have been talking about this for months. There have also been news articles written about it in major newspapers and major blogs for months. And, male-friendly nonprofits concerned with related issues have been screaming about it. Ultimately it's up to the people of California to protest this. We can't fight a battle for them that they don't want to fight. It's a damn shame that we care more about their future than they do.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:42 AM
1

It depends on what "winning" means to you. If "winning" means seeing a good portion of the population agree with at least some of our worldview, I think this is possible. If "winning" means men genuinely being treated equal to women, not in a million billion zillion years. Too many powerful people make too much money off of the disposability of men. That's a reality of human history. Sorry.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:29 PM
6

The "Overton Window" is a political science theory about how ideas become acceptable/not acceptable to the public. The Overton Window is opening on men's issues. The unapologetic tone of modern men's activists, followed by education on the issues, is what is doing it.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:29 PM
0

Just a reminder: Liberals have capitulated to the Feminists and Social Justice Warriors and those people have a lot of the real power in your political coalition. So until "true liberals" tell them to STFU or kick them out of the movement you're part of the problem. Added: I used to consider myself something like a classical liberal but I got absolutely disgusted by the capitulation to these wingnuts.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 11:29 PM
22

The cowards deleted the article!
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:11 PM
9

Agreed that it does say the man may just need to leave. But the article says that he should put up with it, at first, to be "gentleman" it is creepy and a double standard to say he should try and put up with it. Apologize, try to work it out, etc. This article would be deemed victim-blaming and apologia for violent abusers if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:33 PM
3

I think most of us reject "chivalry" because it enforces traditional gender roles, which we are against. I would beg to differ that feminists are against chivalry, though. A few of them gripe about opening doors and stuff. But the vast majority of them fight for men to be held to the traditional gender role expectation as being the protector and provider for women.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:43 PM
3

"Under a definition of rape that the average person on the street would consider rape, Men are by far the more likely perpetrator." Under a definition of rape that the average person on the street would consider rape, a whole lot of men sitting in jail right now wouldn't even be there. Various entities such as government and law enforcement, on the basis of guidelines lobbied for by the feminist movement, have stretched the definition of rape far beyond the "common sense" definition of it. The M…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:04 PM
4

I think the Men's Rights Movement's stance is that rape = rape, regardless of who is doing the raping and who the victim is. If you don't like that coerced sex is counted as rape, you may have a point, but that's something you're going to have to argue with Feminists about. Because they define coerced sex as rape.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:21 PM
3

Well, the textbook Feminist definition of rape includes coerced sex. So if women being coerced into sex = rape, then that standard should apply to men too. That is, if we have an interest in gender equality. (which I understand the vast majority of feminists reject.) If we use a more old-school definition of rape, which is being forced to have intercourse via violence or an imminent threat of violence, that's another story. "If it was just "forced to penetrate" being added, then the data would s…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:18 PM
15

FYI: Very good chance this person will try to hurt you in some way, perhaps by ruining your reputation.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:20 PM
11

qwerty3656's feelings > Centers for Disease Control. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:19 PM
2

Men do not have a hugely powerful social and legal network lobbying the government to ensure they can do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:58 PM
3

What if some men, honestly, don't want to have intimate relationships with women? Why is that such a problem? Why can't they have their own reasons for doing so? What makes you, or anyone else, the decider on what men do in their personal lives? The comparison to the feminists you mention is not applicable, because the men who are violent do not have the apparatus of an entire government making sure everything works out well for them.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:51 PM
8

Most of us do advocate for rights for everyone, but our focus is the neglected territory of men's issues. Also, many of us don't even identify as an MRA.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:48 PM
0

Step 1. Imagine having an intimate relationship with a grenade, which can have it's pin pulled at any time. Step 2: If you're cool with that, by all means involve yourselves with women.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:13 PM
10

Honey, you're everything a woman could want, but I'm not haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaappy so I'm going to blow up our lives and cut out a pound of flesh with a dull razor to fund my new life adventure.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:30 PM
1

The "nice" feminists provide aid and comfort to the bigots. If they don't like being lumped in with bigots then they can reform their movement or leave. Moreover, the "nice" feminists are not much better in my experience.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:17 PM
3

Feminists are perfectly happy with men being the disposable pack-mules, protectors, and providers. They only want women to evolve their gender roles .
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:56 AM
2

This blogger should not be taken seriously. Under a different name, I posted a polite, friendly, substantive message with reference to things the MRM is actually doing to help black men. It was in moderation, and then it got deleted. I wish I would have screen-capped it but I was under the impression this blogger wanted a genuine dialogue other than playing stupid games to make MRAs look bad.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:26 PM
14

Yes there are more than a few places that state this. Another one is "not giving your wife or girlfriend money when she asks for it." Men need to abandon women altogether until more of them start helping us fix this shit.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 01:32 PM
1

Supporting crap like this is how retarded Republican politicians try to deflect "War on Women" style accusations. What they don't seem to get is that Feminists will attack them regardless of what they do, because Feminism is part of the Democratic party coalition.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:57 PM
2

I just got done debating a group of feminists on another forum who strongly asserted that "no serious feminist believes in patriarchy theory anymore" and, furthermore, "labeling modern feminists as believers in patriarchy theory is a strawman argument invented by anti-feminist right wingers." How about you and your fellow feminists get together and agree on one single solitary datum about your own movement before you lecture us?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:09 PM
-1

Well, he will of course say he meant "adults" now but I find that highly suspect.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:55 PM
2

Imagine a woman who looks like Big Red saying the stuff that Laci Green says in her videos, and I think you might change your mind.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:51 PM
2

Laci Green is a illogical, man-hating, fairly radical feminist who uses her marginal sex appeal to full advantage.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:50 PM
5

The author definitely deserves some kudos. But as you point out she still has some serious ideological blind spots, re: Men speaking on men's issues are angry / women speaking on men's issues are diverse and egalitarian. Some in the MRM do need to evolve in terms of speech, but the broad brush she's applying is either because she doesn't know about the many reasonable male egalitarians in the MRM or she does know but prefers to broad-brush them as "angry men." We will know we are really getting …
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:47 PM
6

This piece is 2,000% more fair then what I was expecting from Vice and this particular journalist, and actually ranks as one of the better pieces on the men's movement I've seen from a somewhat mainstream source. So, genuine kudos to that. The author, however, is continuing the prevalent bias of painting all male MRAs with the "angry male" brush. It is fair to say that some MRAs are outlandish and definitely need to check the language at times. As it matures as a movement, this needs to happen. …
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:56 PM
-2

Since when does "young girls" = adults? My grandmother calls any woman under 35 a "young girl" but in common parlance, young girl = prepubescent or adolescent.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:13 PM
12

To clarify, this phenomenon is not unique to Islam or any one religion or culture. There are numerous examples of women goading men into war for all kinds of reasons, from religion to nation to "protect the women." A good rebuttal to "if women ruled the world there would be no war."
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:12 PM
2

Sorry to derail the outrage train, but this isn't any worse than a lot of articles written by PUAs.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:41 AM
1

Well the point is, some of these women just want chivalry back but more of them seem to genuinely care.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 07:11 PM
1

I agree with Barb here somewhat but he seems to not notice a ton of these women are calling out misandry.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:24 PM
7

Yes. Not only that, but people who make slurs against gays are told to stop. Some of us criticize the LGBT movement for having close ties with the hateful Feminist movement but that criticism should not be regarded as being against their sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:24 AM
1

For what it's worth, I have talked with this writer via social media and she is a feminist, but she is equality-minded and fair on gender issues. She also criticizes man-hating feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:31 PM
14

"Yet working women today seem unwilling to pay the price of success." THIS. SO MUCH THIS. Unless one is born into wealth or is exceptionally lucky, success comes from sheer tenacity and working 90 hours a week while everyone else is working 70.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:32 PM
9

I agree and that's why MGTOW is more important in the long run then the MRM. Men need to walk away permanently until the situation improves.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:35 AM
8

I'm also having a hard time believing your story, because 1. This is a blatant health code violation which anyone could remedy promptly with a polite call to your local health department 2. Your reddit account is brand new, and in light of point #1, screams trolling. But in the chance you're not trolling, simply call the local health department.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:30 AM
4

Feminism is entrenched in the bureaucracy of the media, government, academia, and left-leaning political parties. Even if the general public is ready to evolve, the Feminists are going to rule the roost for a very long time.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:25 PM
1

Suzanne Venker is great. One of the only conservatives who speaks on men's issues who doesn't have a gynocentric agenda.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:47 PM
22

Feminists hate non-feminist women but they cannot be perceived to hate non-feminist women. FINALLY some women are starting to get that feminism doesn't have their best interests at heart.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:39 PM
2

I am a conservative-leaning libertarian. I agree with liberals on many things and am happy to collaborate with anyone. In fact I have a friend who is an outspoken Marxist and we can even agree on some things. The liberal-bashing on this forum comes from the fact that Feminism originated from the Left, is funded and organized by the Left, and many liberal MRAs are in severe denial about it. That said, gynocentrism is a human problem. Not of one political party or the other. And for the most part,…
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:43 PM
1

Western Feminism has always been primarily concerned with the desires of affluent white women who support left-wing politics.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 04:39 PM
5

I think they are primarily interested in 1. weaponizing rape accusations 2. alleviating women from all personal responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:12 PM
6

Sex-positive and sex-negative feminism is one of the real sticking points many feminists disagree over. However they find broad agreement when it comes to making men responsible for women's sexual choices, and upending the legal concept of due process when it comes to rape accusations.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:17 PM
6

Plenty of current and former sex workers specifically talk about how their profession is liberating. And if women are adults, then their adult agency to make choices based on personal volition should be acknowledged.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 05:14 PM
15

Quote: "Even the notion of consent, considered by so many to be a simple matter, is problematic — in a patriarchal society where women’s agency is circumscribed by male supremacy, how meaningful is consent?"
/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:32 PM
1

Agree with most of this, but feminism is more like instinctive female self-interest + left-wing politics. Women seeking special girl privileges for themselves at the cost of men happened eons before feminism ever did, currently exists outside Feminism, and will exist eons after feminism goes away.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:50 PM
25

Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I posted this because of the attacks, not because it was about abortion.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:00 PM
9

Yup. I support her right to scream whatever balderdash she wants if she can refrain from using physical force & intimidation.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:30 PM
4

Says the ideology that is entirely beholden to men upholding our traditional roles while women are "freed."
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:28 PM
1

I don't deny there is some basis in biology, but a lot of this is social conditioning. The way I got over the last vestiges of my desire to put women on a pedestal was that putting people on pedestals stunts their maturation as human beings.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 04:32 PM
1

Feminism has always been a supremacist movement in the guise of an equality movement. As far back as Seneca Falls in the 19th century, it was about hating on men and seeking special privileges for some women. Nowdays, Feminism only supports the goals and viewpoints of affluent white women who lean to the Left politically. Women's Rights = Great. Feminism = Hateful Supremacism.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:11 PM
2

Yeah the main debate between women on this issue is who should be responsible for taking care of them. Conservative women say their husbands, leftist women say the government.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:02 AM
12

I would say that society has a great deal invested in alleviating women from the burdens of adult responsibility, and we are some of the only people pointing it out.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:17 PM
8

"Supporting the Right" isn't a solution for men's issues. The Right is no panacea. We are better off non-partisan, so as to maximize inclusiveness. But we do need some MRAs who lean Left to be more intellectually honest about the close-mindedness & vicious attacks on men by their fellow travelers.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:04 PM
0

I agree, and I am on the Right myself, but the Right is no panacea for men's issues. I agree they are much more open though, and I have pointed that out many times on Reddit and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:02 PM
6

Hey, I wouldn't discount this point entirely. Numerous women have told me Feminism is sexist.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:13 AM
1

Translation: "You guys, why do we have to stop arsonists from starting forest fires, since our focus is preventing forest fires?"
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:10 PM
9

Perhaps after threatening to kill people, including a Canadian senator, they decided they don't want to risk being id'ed and arrested.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:19 PM
5

Fact of the matter, we didn't have any influence on him at all. But you get the point i'm trying to make...
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:16 AM
1

True. And maybe they will talk about entirely different things.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:14 AM
5

The father of Elliott Rodger to be interviewed by Barbara Walters on 20/20, the same show that produced and then pulled the atrocious smear of the "manospere" a while back.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:57 PM
1

Cool, but Salon could make all the same critiques of the feminist movement. (They won't.)
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:37 PM
1

Mmmm….goose...
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:32 PM
3

I generally don't like "guilt by association" arguments. However, Futrelle and his fellow travelers have been spewing wildly spurious rhetoric about anyone they disagree with for years, so what's good for the goose...
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:14 PM
1

I think it was incredibly selfish for you to delete the last post. Posting things on forums like this isn't meant for your selfish interests alone; it is to serve as a sharing resource for the many, many people who come here to learn about gender issues. A whole lot of people took time to share their opinions with you, and the wider community. You could have very easily edited out some of the personal details, as well. Reddit isn't your personal email box.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:08 PM
1

I've just found my life is less complicated since I'm not in a relationship. The desire to be with women is still there, but it is less than my desire for freedom.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:52 PM
3

I've never felt the need to fit into any traditional male gender role. I'm highly attuned to the "masculine" and "feminine" attributes in my personality. I am heterosexual but I stopped dating nearly a decade ago. When I did date, I never had any desire for a "traditional" marriage or relationship. With that said, I respect others who want to be more traditional so long as they don't push it on anyone else.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:30 PM
6

ANY philosophy, feminism or not, that teaches you to hate seeks to harm you. I am a non-traditional male. I am also very strong and accomplished in life. I've been able to accomplish all that without subscribing to an ideology of hate. I know many strong women who are not shrinking violets, and none of them want anything to do with radical feminism. You need to find role models in your life, be they real, from history, or from fictional tales who are strong & non-conforming in a positive way.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:40 AM
23

Radicals against men's rights probably fall into two categories: Serious misconceptions = being honestly misinformed and open to other points of view Aggressively ignorant bigots = being deliberately obtuse, hard-headed propagandists. The latter really isn't worth paying any attention to, except as a target for ridicule.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:48 PM
-1

I have some hope that growing radical feminism will destroy the Center-Left coalition of traditional labor union populists and activist progressives in Western democracies.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:19 PM
1

I am overjoyed that there are people from all political persuasions interested in men's rights. I agree the people trying to make men's rights a conservative movement are wrong. But there are a lot of people who say there is "no difference" between the right and the left on men's rights. And that's false.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:50 PM
1

Right. I am overjoyed that there are people from all political persuasions interested in men's rights. I just think some need to be more willing to take off the rose-colored glasses when looking at their peers.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:46 PM
1

That may be your (very reasonable) point, but it is not "the" point. I have been around the MHRM a very long time, and most (not all) of the people saying "MR isn't left-right issue" mean it as "there is no difference between the left and the right on men's issues. I am critical of both the Right and the Left on these issues, even though I lean much more to the Right politically. I'd like to see the same intellectual honesty from others.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:06 PM
7

I am shocked. SHOCKED. That the SOCIALIST WORKERS would be rallying against men's rights. After all, I am assured regularly that men's rights isn't a Left - Right issue. Stunning.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:32 PM
1

I think New Orleans would be a spectacular location but for this year at least I think AVfM has to stick to Detroit.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:18 PM
1

That's all I know.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:11 PM
3

I have it on good word as of late this afternoon the event is still going forward, albeit in a different locale. The Doubletree Hilton cancelled the reservations of everyone who was booked at the hotel. Don't know about any other hotel.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:37 PM
9

Thanks. That's precisely why most people sympathetic to the MRM aren't crying over all the negative coverage. It's getting people to actually look at our opinions and decide for themselves. Media bias against men is so hardcore there is no way we were ever going to get fair treatment. So the fairness has to come from people reading with an open mind.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:28 PM
3

This is correct. I just spent about 20 minutes looking in various places looking for AVfM referring to themselves as a non-profit and couldn't find it. In fact, I distinctly recall Paul Elam writing something like "We're not a non-profit, motherfuckers!!!!" or something like that in typical Paul Elam style.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:24 PM
2

Short answer: Society is gynocentric. If men begin to value the human rights of men as much as they do women, it will lessen female privilege. Society prospers on male disposability. As Warren Farrell and countless others have pointed out, society's protection & prosperity depends on many people, usually men, being treated like tools to use and then discard when not wanted. Men's rights inspires men to not want to put up with that crap anymore.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:43 PM
2

She flat-out said that a women's movement was necessary, but a men's movement is unhelpful. Further saying that men have to wait until an egalitarian movement develops. I appreciate Cathy Young, but she has no standing to be the arbiter of who gets to have a human rights movement. I'll note that the women's movement she praises has ALWAYS had some harsh rhetoric. I'll also note that I am critical of some of the over-the-top rhetoric in the MRM and I am in favor of a genuine egalitarian movement …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:56 PM
4

Yes. Sometimes. Except that she flat-out does not want a men's human rights movement to exist. (Seriously. She demands that we give up activism and wait around for the egalitarian feminists to come out of the woodwork.)
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:25 PM
3

I don't know who Barbara Ellen is, but it is up to Feminists to cast out their haters and reform their movement. We can't do it for them.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 09:23 PM
7

So you two use the police as a referee in lieu of marriage counseling? And you're surprised when someone gets arrested? Wow, am I glad I pay my taxes so it gets wasted on shit like this.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:17 PM
2

I agree but DeCrow was a rare exception.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:23 PM
10

Yes Feminists really shoved DeCrow down a memory hole.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:22 PM
4

Interview via Cathy Young
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:51 PM
13

The vast majority of MRAs and gender egalitarians are supportive of women's rights and men's rights. Feminism in industrialized western countries doesn't support women's or men's rights. It furthers the interests of white middle and upper class women who support the political left, and that's about it. Feminism has a history of opposing anyone who challenges white lady privilege, be it man or woman.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:59 AM
1

I really wish you would pursue criminal charges against her.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:49 PM
1

Nice thoughts, but I would add that Feminism has used hatred/fear of men as a tactic to scare women into submission and gin up group solidarity. As long as that continues to happen, and Feminists don't challenge it, there's little chance of collaboration.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:16 PM
2

This is a waste of our time. I have heard dozens of different definitions of Feminism, with each Feminist espousing it claiming their Feminism is the One True Feminism. It is reasonable for people in the same movement to disagree on the finer points of what they stand for. It is not reasonable for a movement to shape shift like some kind of fantastical comic book superhero.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:43 PM
2

They're alleging systematic discrimination based on a metric that is useless without considering many other factors.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:32 PM
1

Well, there are reasons why the Right is more open to dissident views on feminism and men's issues, biggest among them that the feminist establishment is firmly ensconced in the Left.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:29 PM
5

It's really not unusual for an event of this size. What makes it unusual is the hotel's demands contrasted with their apparent failure to call the cops about the threats.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:24 PM
1

Yeah I agree completely. I think it's going to get really ugly. But there was never going to be an upsurge in positive attention on us, ever. The shit had to hit the fan, eyes will be on us, and it will now be up to them whether they give us a fair shot. Some of the stupid things that AVfM has done in the past made me very angry but I think they run a fairly tight ship now. If anyone has even slightly an open mind, I think they're going to figure out really fast we're not about beating women or …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:11 PM
1

There is a press conference planned for the Thursday before the conference which includes some heavy hitters like Dr. Warren Farrell and a Canadian elected official. As for a "spokesperson" I am confident that AVfM will choose wisely on who gets to officially speak for them.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:51 PM
15

Quote from the blog post: "As a professional researcher in the legal field, I enjoyed that video greatly. However, I am terrified of sharing it with my friends for fear of being pilloried as a misogynist. When I tried to suggest, while in no way condoning his vicious rants, that Elliot Rodger’s actions were more those of a mentally ill person than a “natural result” of widespread hatred of women, my suggestion was so quickly and roundly dismissed in light of his “obvious” motives that I decided …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:45 PM
3

Based on what authority must we live by progressive values? Current progressive values in the US assert that women are heroic victims and men are oppressive monsters.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:03 PM
3

This is obnoxiously stupid. Why would AVfM "make up" something that jeopardizes their own conference? I could come up with a better yarn to discredit AVfM and I have supported them for years.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 08:22 PM
10

While I am happy they are bringing attention to this, Cenk is on record mocking male victims of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:13 PM
10

I agree, but we cannot coerce people into abandoning the gender roles they desire or force them into roles of our choosing. That's repressive stuff that Feminists and Social Conservatives do. Many, many people still want to uphold mainstream-type gender roles in accordance with their desired lifestyle and sexual preference. Regardless of what we say or do, many men and women enjoy traditional gender roles. We need to tolerate them, just as much as they should tolerate those of us who are differe…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:48 PM
13

You don't think "Abolish all gender I don't personally approve of" is problematic?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:22 PM
1

In the short-term, we're going to come under tremendous heat. It is going to get really, really bad. But this had to happen. There was no way we were ever going to get fair coverage in the mainstream, so in order to get mentioned at all, we had to be slandered, vilified, and threatened. It is going to get much worse. But open-minded people will see what we are about, and their minds will change.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:11 PM
13

HOW DARE YOU DENY THE RAPE OF MY IMAGINARY DOPPELGANGER
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:34 PM
70

I felt this way for awhile, but now I believe it is important to show compassion towards everyone who needs it. I understand your frustration, but I'm not going to let the "A man looked at me weird, KILL ALL MEN" crowd reduce my humanity.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:34 PM
6

Their conspiracy theory is that the egalitarianism is a front for male supremacy, sammitch making, and soforth.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:04 AM
3

He is a socialist agitator who has been making outlandish attacks on men's rights for years.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:02 AM
5

So much fail.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:01 AM
2

Imagine the liability lawsuit Hilton would face if some nutbar were to assault their employees and they hadn't taken the threats serious.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:16 AM
2

Good one.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:14 AM
2

I'm more worried about chivalrous "respect my authority" white knights than sensitive feminist males.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 12:08 AM
6

I am not an expert on such things, but I would imagine this hotel chain does not condone terroristic threats to their employees or their property. I would assume proper channels have been notified.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:27 PM
7

This guy tried to debate Paul Elam a while back. He is a Grade A nutbar. Pretty sure he will do a Schwyzer and go off the deep end.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:08 PM
19

Yes, please keep your eyes on men's rights activism. We are non-violent, we have nothing to hide, and we are growing.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:02 PM
11

Charles Clymer, noted self-hating Feminist and enthusiastic purple poodle, has been accused of using his "Sensitive Feminist Man" persona to have sex with women.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:18 PM
0

The reality is, a lot of them are in fantasy land about what their movement actually stands for and does.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:20 PM
11

The story on the threats at AVfM addresses these thoughts. http://www.avoiceformen.com/a-voice-for-men/threats-of-violence-and-death-against-doubletree-hilton-in-detroit-over-mens-conference/
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:01 PM
4

I often praise individual Feminists when they genuinely contribute to human rights. Feminism, the movement, is supremacist and doesn't even support the rights of most women let alone men. I'm not going to mince words on the latter because the former hasn't done their due diligence to understand the monstrosity they are supporting.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:34 PM
8

There is often coarse language associated with men's rights. Happily conceded. But there's coarse language everywhere on the internet. I think you'll also find that if some people make bigoted comments, they are down voted and criticized. Thanks for having an open mind.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:13 AM
16

This is what the movement has always been about. It is a supremacist movement in the guise of an equality movement. Unfortunately, it has been very clever at tricking a lot of well-meaning people like you as to its real intentions. And I'm speaking as a former feminist myself.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:30 PM
1

Pro - sex and anti - sex feminism is one of the big disagreements in the movement. Their compromise is to blame everything women do on men.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:41 PM
7

"I can no longer, in good conscience, consider myself a "feminist", if this is what the movement has become." This is what the movement has always been about. It is a supremacist movement in the guise of an equality movement. Unfortunately, it has been very clever at tricking a lot of well-meaning people like you as to its real intentions. And I'm speaking as a former feminist myself.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:20 PM
3

-Do you think that Men have less political power than Women? Why? Yes. Taking the US as an example, women represent the majority of voters and control the majority of wealth. Simply because there may be more male politicians, this does not = male political power, especially when many male politicians pander to women. Ultimately, I believe monied special interests have more power than women or men, but women have more than men. -Do you think that Men have less religious power than Women? Why? I h…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:05 PM
7

A lot of men react poorly if women reject them. Obviously, much of this "react poorly" is getting depressed but conceded that sometimes it can result in verbal insults or worse. Women react poorly when they get rejected too. Many of them call the man a homosexual slur, or something. This has happened to me several times. I hear stories regularly of women claiming abuse and trying to get men beat up or fired from their jobs for rejecting her. Some women physically assault men who reject them. Yes…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:53 PM
29

Sex worker's rights is one of the causes I pursue besides men's rights. Unfortunately, some "pro" sex work activists are fairly radical in their anti-male and anti-men's rights opinions. But I can say the same about the LGBT community and I still support them.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:51 PM
2

Good point. I get sick and tired of the articles in the manosphere expressing bigotry towards LGBT or minorities, because I think it's useless and counterproductive. But no worse than stuff the fempire does on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:17 PM
3

Salacious headlines get clicks and page visits. But I hear what you are saying.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:15 PM
-1

I'm sorry, but this just isn't true. The Right is no panacea for men's rights. A lot of belief in male disposability, and besotted with chivalry at times. And they deserve to be criticized for those things. But, conservative / libertarian publications have been making pro-mens rights noises for a couple years now and I see a new one almost every day. The Left provides aid, comfort, money, and institutional power to anti-male feminism. The Left still upholds chivalry and male disposability. And L…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:20 PM
-4

CONSERVATIVE, for those still insisting men's rights isn't a left-right issue.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:43 PM
1

There is scant little evidence connecting Rodger to the MRM. There is a great deal of evidence connecting him to the far-left "Young Turks" program. Obviously Cenk Uygur is responsible for creating this madman.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:34 PM
1

"The Patriarchy forces women to drive cars, fly in airplanes, live in houses, buy consumer goods, and run air conditioning. Back to the caves!!!!!" - Swedish Feminist Party
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:17 PM
1

WHAT??? SALON . COM HAS BEEN CORRUPTED BY THE KOCH BROTHERS TOO? BAN ALL THE SPEECH!!!!!
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:50 AM
1

I have been involved in gender issues for almost two decades, and come from a gender egalitarian perspective. I have tried to have "dialogues" on gender issues with feminists all throughout this time. 90% of the time their contribution to the dialogue was being hateful, dismissive of male experiences, touting left-wing politics, and primarily concerned with spouting debunked talking points about how horrible men are. My experience is not unique. You might be a genuine egalitarian feminist, and t…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:32 AM
1

Yeah there were things I disagreed with in her essay but I still thought it was wonderful and I shared it via social media. We need to support "good" feminists when they are willing to stick their necks out like this.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:12 PM
5

You're right. When Catholic Cardinals gather to elect a new Pope, this is men meeting to discuss things too. The Roman Catholic Church inspired Elliot Rodger!!!!
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:23 PM
10

I wouldn't try to get this pulled. I want to put giant spotlights on it and sound trumpets to get people to look at it. The shit being flung at the MRM will probably hurt us for a time. It's not fair, at all, but we all know hate movements like feminism don't play fair. With that said, Feminism is shitting their bed so bad right now I wouldn't believe it if I couldn't see it for myself. They've spent the last several days displaying open bigotry towards all men. They have crassly hijacked a mass…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:37 PM
3

The shit being flung at the MRM will probably hurt us for a time. It's not fair, at all, but we all know hate movements like feminism don't play fair. With that said, Feminism is shitting their bed so bad right now I wouldn't believe it if I couldn't see it for myself. They've spent the last several days displaying open bigotry towards all men. They have crassly hijacked a massive human tragedy for political advantage. And they have made the male victims of the massacre vanish on purpose so they…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:57 PM
5

The opinions of feminists do not = the feminist narrative. The narrative is the dogma, myths, and rationalizations Feminism has been spouting for decades. I agree some feminists are better then this, but I constantly wonder why they choose to ally themselves with a hate movement that treats them like children.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 05:14 PM
10

You and I both know our secret Patriarchy Rings can summon giant anvils to fall out of the sky onto the heads of whoever we want.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:31 PM
6

No need to put "feminist" in quotes. This is a very common feminist narrative on domestic violence. She also expresses that woman are children. Also common feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:30 PM
2

I read it. There's not. He is a sociopathic narcissist who hated everyone, but especially women. The facts won't matter of course. Feminists and politicians are going to revel in this tragedy and milk it for all it's worth.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:01 PM
12

They are honest about wanting to destroy men.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:56 PM
14

I hear where you're coming from, but I have a different take on this. Feminists don't give a shit about men. Ok, that's their choice. Feminists demand that men help women. Ok, that's fine too. My response is a middle finger, but they can demand if they want. However, since this is the way feminists are, they need to stop portraying themselves as an equality movement. That's why I consider radfems to be the only honest feminists.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 11:31 PM
1

I agree, but you also have to take into account that Feminism directly serves the political interests of Left-leaning political parties around the world. Even if there is a mass awakening among ordinary men & women, the feminist machine will continue because it is a bonanza for helping powerful people get more powerful.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:32 PM
2

Some feminists are nice and genuinely for equality. Feminism is a vicious supremacist hate movement. I don't care if someone is the nicest Feminist in the world, they are still allying themselves with a hate movement and deserve to be criticized.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:13 PM
2

Not a men's rights issue. But she seems like a great catch.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:27 PM
3

Feminists do not believe women can think independently, and make their views excruciatingly clear. The fact that feminism remains so wildly popular despite this confirms their belief.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:31 PM
3

Yes, and female supremacism in general. Women bitch and moan about being perceived as "child caretakers" yet many of them think it's a good idea to exclude men as child caretakers.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:12 PM
1

I am absolutely stunned this politically Left-leaning website would be throwing MRAs under the bus, while Right-leaning & libertarian publications are becoming warmer to the idea of men's human rights every day. Shocked, because I am assured by so many that men's rights doesn't have anything to do with politics. This must all be a coincidence.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 08:51 PM
6

I don't understand why anyone would expect better behavior. Feminism is a hateful supremacist movement. Full stop. Not all feminists are hateful supremacists, but whatever their intentions, they are basically a veneer of respectability on a hateful supremacist movement. The sooner the men's rights subreddit realizes this, and stops looking for good intentions where none exists, the better off we will be. I've been involved in gender issues for over two decades, first as a feminist, and now as an…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:01 PM
4

This is a good one
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:12 PM
0

Some Feminists are genuine and nice, but Feminism is a vicious supremacist hate movement. You should be apologizing to yourself for believing this monstrous garbage.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:14 PM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:50 PM
2

Makes sense to me
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:50 PM
0

And yet another CONSERVATIVE publication with a pro-equality position on a topic that is a serious men's rights issue. I note these are coming out at a rapid clip from conservative/libertarian publications and blogs these days. Like, almost daily. I'll just assume that there are as many similar articles coming from the Left asserting a fair stance, as I am assured that men's rights has nothing to do with politics.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:03 AM
1

Hey LOOK! Another CONSERVATIVE publication presenting a sound, nuanced, pro-equality position on a topic that is a serious men's rights issue. I note these are coming out at a rapid clip from conservative/libertarian publications and blogs these days. I'll just assume that there are as many similar articles coming from the Left, as I am assured that men's rights has nothing to do with politics.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:56 PM
12

In my experience, dating entitled and ignorant people turns out bad sooner or later especially if the relationship gets more serious. If you and her are just fucking and hanging out, maybe it's not as big of a deal.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:50 PM
2

I notice that Feminist anti-sex brigades are getting more vocal and full-frontal these days. Perhaps Feminist leadership has identified that they now have the upper hand in society and can openly pursue the puritanical authoritarianism they've been fantasizing about since the 19th century.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:34 PM
6

It's also worth noting that bell hooks is often cited as an example of a "nice" feminist whom we MRAs should read to realize how great feminism is.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:36 PM
4

Atheism is becoming a feminist cult.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:36 PM
2

I say "backstabber" because 1. he is glossing over the massive risks men take when they enter into relationships with women. 2. The last thing any men's rights activist should be doing is shaming men for not manning up and finding a woman. If he found someone, awesome. I'm happy for him. But if he wants to consider me or any other man a failure for not "keeping trying" he can go pound sand.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:22 PM
2

I say "backstabber" because 1. he is glossing over the massive risks men take when they enter into relationships with women. 2. The last thing any men's rights activist should be doing is shaming men for not manning up and finding a woman. If he found someone, awesome. I'm happy for him. But if he wants to consider me or any other man a failure for not "keeping trying" he can go pound sand.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:22 PM
1

I am not a doctor but I have worked on HIV/AIDS advocacy programs in the past, and, unless people are sharing needles or engaging in seriously rough, bestial, unprotected sex, F to M transmission just doesn't happen that easily. (That's not to say it doesn't happen.) I hear stories like the above often and they should be taken with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:50 PM
10

Good to hear. I have no doubt my last several employers would have been fair and measured if such things came up.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:07 PM
3

It's a struggle to even find Feminists willing to distance themselves from Dworkin, so I highly doubt we will ever see Feminists distancing themselves from Valenti.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:46 PM
1

It is positive to tell men to take action to improve their lives. It is an incomplete message unless it comes with an education in all the ways men are utterly screwed by the current state of laws & society. Your church, while good-intentioned, is setting up men to get fucked over with this incomplete education.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:43 PM
2

I agree that men need to be action-oriented but I completely disagree with the assertion women haven't been taking control of men. The entire history of Feminism is a history of women belittling, dehumanizing, and marginalizing men by any means necessary. It is good to teach men to be men of action, but without the counterpart message about female chauvinism, it becomes a boilerplate "man up" message that will not prepare men for the society they face.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:22 PM
7

Nobody should be able to retroactively waive consent.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:44 PM
1

And in 2016, Democrats will line up to vote for the woman who enabled an accused rapist and sex predator, who Democrats elected President twice.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:19 PM
2

Men should be angry. People don't want us to be angry on our own behalf, because male activity is the most powerful force in the world and the status quo wants that activity to benefit women, and very elite men. The challenge is channeling male anger into a force for good.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:10 PM
10

Yes, it is bigoted, illogical, and not historically accurate.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:49 PM
1

She sexually assaulted you man. Call a lawyer, call the cops, hide yo kids hide yo wife...
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:12 PM
1

The Overton Window does seem to be moving in a positive direction in the popular cultural narrative, but I'm not going to pop the champagne yet.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:35 PM
4

That's the political benefit of utopian ideologies like Feminism. Their utopia can never be achieved, so true believers always have something to fight for.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:33 PM
2

No way, man. Jesus totes wanted us to bomb brown people for oil. You take that back! lol
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:32 PM
1

Actually, that's not correct. Negative campaigning works brilliantly, that's why politicians do it even though people say they don't "like" it. But even if I granted you that point, which I don't, if we want to advocate effectively for men and boys we need to not just talk about the issues, but also talk about our opposition. And we do both. Most of the main men's rights sites talk about a lot more than feminism.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:32 AM
12

Please consider commenting anyway. People will listen to you, since you're a woman. I can say the exact same thing all day until I'm blue in the face, and people will dismiss me as an evil oppressive male.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:33 PM
5

They didn't take back the wage gap lies. They are still running with them. One low-level adviser said "Yeah this is bullshit, we know" but publicly they have kept up with the lies.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:31 PM
7

On what planet have you been living on where this is a surprise now?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 08:30 PM
5

Absolutely no reason for us to continue to bite the bullet when we're hated and disrespected for it. Let it burn.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:57 PM
7

An organized movement of men abandoning their traditional roles threatens the very core of society. That's why it upsets people so much.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:33 PM
2

I disagree very much with Kay on some things but she is a savvy critic of feminism and a strong advocate of men's rights. Rosin is a female supremacist with some intellectual honesty.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:04 PM
2

Yes, absolutely. She is firmly in the female supremacist camp of feminism. She literally believes that women are superior to men.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:02 PM
2

Thank you for your honesty. I understand why people don't like GOP and/or prefer Democrats but in the past I've spoken to a lot of Democrat MRA's who won't even admit their party favors Feminism.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:06 AM
3

Because feminism has a long history of directly opposing men's human rights, spreading hateful myths about men, and championing discriminatory laws and legislation. Feminists are not our only opposition but they are the spearhead of our opposition. If we were a group devoted to helping the victims of burglary, part of that advocacy would be identifying burglars and taking steps to thwart them.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:59 AM
2

I am hugely supportive of LGBT rights, but I see this as an attempt to co-opt men's rights to focusing on the only men's issue that Feminism deems important. If MRAs focus on "ending homophobia" we're helping a cause feminists support. Not getting all uppity by demanding equal human rights to women.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:43 PM
5

Just one example among many of how thought leaders in conservative & libertarian circles are starting to push male friendly information. I'm noticing a huge increase, and I follow most of them. Meanwhile, Democrats and the progressive netroots bow down to radical feminism every chance they get. I would be dishonest if I claimed the Right was a panacea for men's rights. But it's equally dishonest for other MRAs to claim there is no difference between the parties on men's issues.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:37 PM
5

I hear what you are saying, but society's current old fogeys deserve to be taken out behind the barn for what they allowed to happen under their watch in the 2nd half of the 20th century.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:33 PM
9

These exact same arguments were being had 15 years ago. Egalitarians & others were criticizing feminism, and some feminists were wringing their hands, wondering how to address it. Yet the herd mentality continued and Feminists just kept marching in lockstep.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:31 PM
21

I'm probably going to sound like a cranky old man here, but I am getting really tired of writers on gender issues pretending like these problems with the feminist narrative just popped up 15 minutes ago. These same issues have existed, and have been highlighted and debated, for DECADES now. But thanks to the creepy herd mentality of feminists, they seem suddenly startled at the criticism. And those of us who know the truth have to painstakingly make the same arguments over and over and over and …
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:17 PM
0

Left-leaning MRA's turning their rationalization hamsters up to 11.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:08 PM
9

"Unless they are conservative or libertarian women, then they can go to hell and die."
/r/MensRights25/04/14 12:47 PM
5

YES. Hers is the kind of feminism I can support.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:33 AM
3

Yes
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:50 PM
1

Try to find a euphemism for Feminism and/or mention certain people & organizations that have put forward the views you want to critique, rather than generalizing. I generalize Feminists as supremacists all the time in regular conversation, and make no apologies for it, but were I writing a formal paper I would be specific.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 06:25 PM
23

(Man slowly dying of a gutshot in the trenches of WW1) "Well this is painful but THANK GOD I'M NOT A WOMAN!"
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:22 PM
4

Considering that numerous popular conservative bloggers are now openly promoting men's rights issues and discussing why feminism does not = equality, i think it's about time certain folks pulled their heads out of a certain orifice. The right has a problem with gynocentrism at times. The left is addicted to gynocentrism and openly champions radical feminism. This is not rocket science, I don't think.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 09:35 PM
7

Gee, I wonder which political party she belongs to.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:58 PM
0

“To women, you’re either the shit, or you don’t exist” If men kept this in mind at all times, the world would be a much, much better place.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:33 PM
4

Women's Rights are awesome just like any form of human rights, and we did/do need to ensure they are preserved and grow. Feminism has primarily been focused on establishing female privilege, especially wealthy white female privilege, at the expense of everyone else. Look into the "white feather campaign" engaged in by the suffragettes and I think you will see what i'm talking about.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:36 PM
7

No. Feminism has always been a supremacist movement opposed to men's rights. More people are starting to notice now.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:36 PM
2

The Feminism that dominates the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and Scandinavia couldn't care less about women of color. It is a movement by and for liberal middle class and upper class white women. Women of color are starting to realize this too. You have a really great perspective. Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:02 PM
2

Some Feminists do say "we are only for women and girls" and that's at least honest. Although I would argue Feminism pretty much despises conservative women and ignores women from racial minorities.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 01:01 AM
7

Thank you for speaking up. There are many ways to support gender equality without identifying with the counterproductive feminist movement. Cheers!
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:43 PM
26

Precisely the reason why I abandoned Feminism a long time ago. It's a chauvinist movement wearing the mask of an equality movement. There are many genuine good-natured feminists but the movement is hateful, irrational, and supremacist.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:23 PM
-1

This is overly intellectual. Women reject Nice Guys because they behave in a manner that the female's primal sexual drive finds revolting, even if she may "like" him when he dotes on her. Men make fun of Nice Guys because men are in constant status competition.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:15 PM
18

"I would recommend just trying to build bridges without mentioning MRA issues but that isn't easy." I have had some success with this but even the most equality-minded Feminists won't budge an inch on giving up their special treatment.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:02 PM
28

Because Feminism is a supremacist movement wearing the mask of an equality movement. Feminism only represents the views of liberal middle and upper class white women, and couldn't care less about anyone else. There is a long and storied history of feminism opposing efforts at equality in employment, education, family courts, divorce courts, criminal justice, and social welfare spending. Feminism also has a history of spreading hate about men ("Testosterone is dangerous, all men are rapists, only…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:50 PM
9

Speculation: There have been a surprising number of "pro-equality" noises coming from Harvard for several months now, including the release of several studies that show the benefits of two-parent homes for society, and support for job-training initiatives for working-class men. It could be the Ruling Class intelligentsia at Harvard is starting to feel the pendulum has shifted too far against men and they are changing tack. But I wouldn't get my hopes up too much.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:16 PM
20

Whether or not the dichotomy is real or fake, we can still observe the actions of political parties. You have to at least acknowledge that Left wing political groups support Big Feminism every chance they get. I'm perfectly happy to acknowledge the Right are very gynocentric. But people on the Left are very gynocentric PLUS they are hand-in-hand with Feminism. It seems like members of this subreddit who are more on the left don't want to acknowledge this, and I think that's dishonest.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:21 PM
-32

"But men's rights isn't a left / right issue!!!!" say morons.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:03 PM
1

The biological reasons for male disposability / female preciousness are no longer relevant. There are about 7 billion people on the planet, we are not going to go extinct short of an armageddon-level catastrophe. I agree that "animal nature" is a huge influence on our behavior, yet somehow most of the human race has evolved beyond the rape/incest/interspecies sex that is de rigeur in the animal kingdom so I think we can put aside male disposability too. Saying "that's just the way it is, therefo…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:46 PM
4

The Right is gynocentric, the Left is gynocentric and dominated by Feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:00 PM
-2

You can't generalize all cultures like this.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:37 PM
13

I don't get why the MRM is making you sad. Sounds like we're the only ones saying what you now know to be true.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:16 PM
6

It's still a gynocentric philosophy that denies male humanity. Traditionalists also want to start/continue wars (orgies of male disposability) for "Jesus."
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:18 PM
7

Feminism = men are pointless and disposable. Women are to be cherished and protected. Traditionalism = Men are disposable, but we should pat them on the head occasionally so they feel good about it. Women are to be cherished and protected.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:47 PM
2

She's absolutely right. Hypergamy makes it very hard for women to find desirable husbands if the women are making a good income. That's how female psychology works. With that said, Phyllis Schlafly is a religious traditionalist and the world she imagines for men is just as stifling and biased as the Feminists.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 01:20 PM
1

They don't even know what they are saying. They are conflating individual identity with individual rights (a dangerous fallacy) and then they are saying individual rights needs to be discarded so we can have discussions and serve society.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:57 AM
5

These people have no idea what individual rights are. Individual rights are not one's individual identity. People should look beyond their individual identity to have discussions. Individual rights should never be discarded or transcended to "Serve Society." That's collectivism.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:20 PM
3

There is no point to marriage, in most cases, except to provide a good situation for the rearing of children. No-fault divorce, along with corrupt divorce & family courts, just makes marriage more of a sick joke.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:35 PM
2

I think that reforming alimony/child support would have the effect of disincentivizing divorce in many cases. Right now, women know they can enjoy a bonanza of cash & prizes by filing. Change that, and they may reconsider.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:33 PM
3

I would prefer they reformed alimony and child custody / child support first. But otherwise, thumbs up.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:34 AM
4

YES Some of my friends who are more on the "Left" are against the privilege checking stuff too. One goes as far to say it is specifically designed to destroy the solidarity of the working class so that they can be more easily conquered.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:14 PM
0

Exactly. Men have to realize that EVERY TIME they have sex with a woman, they have to assume that 1. She is fertile 2. She will keep the baby. Society lets women murder their children and rape other people's children, and only gives them a slap on the wrist, and most women love this situation. Any man who expects honesty and accountability from a woman is asking to get in trouble. It's time that men get real to the situation we are facing.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:31 PM
1

Also: more "equal" marriages are less sexually active Also also: marriages where the woman makes more money than the man are far more likely to end in divorce.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 03:17 PM
7

I am not a lawyer, but - Insist on a pregnancy test after the baby is born. Don't let her put your name on the birth certificate as a father until you do. If you are the father you're going to have to either cough up the money that is demanded of you, or you will have to leave the country and never come back. You know you fucked up, badly, so there's no reason for me to pile on.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:55 AM
1

Even TV programming that has a majority of male viewers tries to pander to women, such as the NFL turning out their players wearing pink shit for breast cancer.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 07:35 PM
9

Most television is designed to pander to females, because they are by far the most desirable demographic to market to. It's all about the benjamins. This is a major reason why I stopped watching TV over a decade ago.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:09 PM
2

It's not my choice of issue. I would probably choose something like teachers raping their students because it is way more common than leaving babies in dumpsters. But I think it's a stretch to interpret them as fundamentalist pro life posters. I've been seeing radical pro lifers for a long time and they're more fixated on the gross pictures of fetuses.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:25 AM
1

I have several LGBT friends who are conservative or libertarian politically. They get treated horribly by other LGBT's for it. Very similar to how Feminists disrespect women who are conservative or libertarian.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:40 PM
3

ZOMG THIS IS MISOHGENIEY NO BAND WITH MEN IN IT HAS EVAR BEEN BOO'ED IN HISTORY OF WORLD!!!!!
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:37 PM
11

Yes I find it consistently hilarious how Democrat LGBT activists bend over backwards to ignore and cover up the seething homophobia among a % of ardent Democrats.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 08:01 PM
2

The "social justice" thing is destroying the reputation and solidarity of the political Left. We should avoid it like the plague.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:57 PM
4

While I'm incredibly supportive of LGBT rights, I know for a fact the majority of them would consider me a thought criminal for most of my views. Interesting how that works.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:54 PM
2

What if it is a public figure, like a celebrity or a politician?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:35 PM
3

Example: What if an Anti-Semite was saying hideous things about Jews for three years? Would it be considered acceptable for the class to just sit there and put up with it? I would hope not. I'm not saying people should have screamed and tarred and feathered her (although that is EXACTLY what would happen to a man) but someone could say politely "Well, that's not cool. Maybe we shouldn't be generalizing one half the human race in such a hateful manner." I understand it can be hard to stand out bu…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:01 PM
8

Actually the fact that this took three years shows what a bunch of man-haters the other women are, and what a bunch of cowards the men are.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 03:15 PM
0

YES!
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:39 PM
9

I'd like to see a president who's policies and perspectives i support regardless of the shape of their genitals.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:38 PM
7

At least they are acknowledging that LGBT couples are at risk of violence too. Feminism has a long history of denying such things happen.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:11 PM
1

Oh I'm expecting it.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:00 PM
15

LOL. I saw that. Even CNN, which usually favors Democrats, is calling them on it. Democrats are very concerned about getting their asses spanked in Congressional elections in 2014 and they are on a full-frontal feminist push in efforts to rile up female votes and donations.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:08 PM
12

Democrats are very concerned about getting their asses spanked in Congressional elections in 2014 and they are on a full-frontal feminist push in efforts to rile up female votes and donations.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 07:07 PM
4

Yes. Mary Koss deliberately pushed a biased study which specifically excludes male victims of female rapists, and this influenced government policy. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/cunning-stunts-of-history-mary-koss-and-rape-culture/ Also, the feminist-invented "Duluth Model" for domestic violence doesn't even acknowledge that men can be abused and women can be perpetrators. The "Duluth Model" was a key influence of the Violence Against Women Act in the US, which treats domestic violence a…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:09 PM
6

It depends on the meaning of egalitarian, but what most of us stand for is equal rights, equal opportunity, and equal responsibilities. Egalitarianism sometimes stands for equality of outcome which I and many mra's are very much against. There are a few MRA's who come from a more religious traditionalist background but they are far out weighted by the equality minded, and by the way the traditionalists have a tendency to call us a bunch of Communists or other insulting terms. The reason why the …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:06 PM
3

It is sexism but not something I would flip my gourd over. Mainly it reveals the severe double standards we have in society, as high status male-majority professions have Feminists all up in arms and female-majority professions raise nary an eyebrow.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:56 PM
55

First and second wave feminists were worse than modern tumblr feminists. Examples: 1. Margaret Sanger was a nazi sympathizer, KKK supporter, and believer in eugenics. 2. Simone De Beauvoir said women should not be allowed to marry, and should instead be forced to make different life choices. 3. Betty Freiden compared housewives to concentration camp victims 4. Andrea Dworkin had violent murder and torture fantasies about men. 5. Mary Koss denies that men can be raped by women, and lobbied the cd…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:32 PM
52

Because feminism is a supremacist ideology with decades of history of censorship, biased advocacy, and spreading hate. Feminism has demonstrated antipathy towards any man or woman who does not narrowly fit their rigid ideology. On top of all that, feminism treats women like children who can't be held responsible for their actions. I believe in human rights, equal rights, and equal responsibilities, and for these reasons i oppose feminism.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:43 AM
1

What if a man had explained in precise detail why it's acceptable when prison guards have sex with female juveniles in their captivity?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:57 AM
1

I agree but there is also a very strong element of gynocentrism in the Right we shouldn't overlook.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:26 PM
3

For what it's worth I think framing some of these issues as "working class" is both accurate and an excellent rhetorical tactic, because you're addressing real issues in terms they can empathize with. Also keep in mind that any issue affecting men most likely affects males from minority demographics extra hard. So that could be another way to approach that is compelling to them.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:25 PM
0

I support school uniforms as well.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:03 PM
20

I generally think our society is too prudish about nudity, be it man or woman, but taking pictures of someone nude while they're sleeping and obviously can't consent is unethical.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 01:55 PM
5

Sen. Warren is not nearly as smart as she is cracked up to be. I don't get why my progressive friends are so enthralled by her. But regardless, she's repeating the .77 cents line because it gets feminists riled up to send her and other Democrats money. It doesn't matter whether she knows the truth or not.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 08:29 PM
6

Though it is obvious that feminism has been a negative to gender equality rather than a positive, the reason why we don't have more Mr. Moms is because most women don't want that.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:38 PM
2

I've sent writings from that Bax guy to socialist friends and said "Hey, check it out. If not, that's cool too." They wrote me back and said it was a perspective on feminism they had not considered before.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:09 PM
3

I agree, and my view is that anyone with a heart for these issues should be welcome.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:44 PM
6

There was a socialist named E Belfort Bax who was a critic of feminism in the early 20th century. He was very accurate and pinpointed stuff that we see happening today. With that said, I agree with many in the MHRM who feel that Anti-male Feminism and Socialism are two peas in a pod. My challenge to socialists who identify with the MHRM is to challenge the status quo in their political circles. Because those of us who are conservatives and libertarians are challenging the status quo in ours.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:42 PM
1

I understand where you are coming from, and it's an interesting point, but not completely accurate. Feminism is conservative compared to classical liberalism, but not compared to the modern Left, which is highly rigid and authoritarian. And the reality is Feminism and the modern Left are two peas in a pod. Though I acknowledge the Right is kinda shitty on these issues too.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:19 PM
1

It's gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:59 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:44 AM
3

Yeah that is horse shit. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:44 AM
23

Some feminists genuinely care about equality and operate under the illusion that feminism does too. but the movement is supremacist. In fact it really only represents a percentage of women.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:04 PM
1

"Most" people do not pay taxes, at least on a federal level. Millions upon millions of income earners effectively pay no federal income tax. The author of the piece is endorsing a tax break on one person, and a punitive, higher tax on another person. This is not the same thing as, say, a tax credit for persons who buy a hybrid automobile or whatever.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:29 PM
0

Because there is a vast, vast difference between a tax credit being granted to parents and a punitive tax burden / lighter tax burden based on parenthood.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:12 PM
4

I agree it's not feminist, per se, but it does not affect the genders equally. Men pay the majority of income taxes in the country yet are virtually ignored by most government health & social welfare programs. Fertile women can conceive, get pregnant, and give birth without a man's consent but men need a willing partner that wants to carry the child to term.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:30 PM
16

Men pay the majority of income taxes in the country yet are virtually ignored by most government health & social welfare programs. Fertile women can conceive, get pregnant, and give birth without a man's consent but men need a willing partner that wants to carry the child to term. The law does not apply equally, because the ratio of taxes / benefits is not equal and men & women are not in equal standing biologically.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:18 PM
3

To be fair, Ukraine hasn't exactly been steeped in Feminism like the West was but it's a good case study on why traditionalism is as bad or worse to men then the Feminist status quo.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:27 AM
16

I dated a fairly hardcore feminist for 18 months many years ago and in retrospect I would have saved myself a ton of hardship had I cut it off at the beginning once I figured out her stances.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:39 PM
0

If you're talking to people online, send them this article: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html Hannah Rosin is a notorious man-hating feminist who says men are obsolete and we'd be better off just harvesting them for sperm and then letting them die off. And even she says the wage gap is false. Plus, Slate is a left-wing, feminist publication.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:40 PM
3

In job-to-job comparisons, men get paid more overall because they work more hours than women over the course of their careers and are more likely to negotiate their salary. In the workforce overall, men get paid more than women because of the two points mentioned above, plus the fact that men take on more dangerous jobs (risk vs reward) and choose more lucrative careers. These are all very widely known facts, even acknowledged by hardcore man-hating feminists like Hannah Rosin, who says the "gen…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:42 PM
3

Feminism only insists on equality for women in roles that are beneficial to (some) women. They don't lift a finger to change inequities for men as compared to women. For example, feminists demand quotas for industries in which men are "overrepresented" (STEM, Computer Science) and corporate boards, but don't say a word about industries where women are "overrepresented" (health care, education, government, media) Feminism does nothing to rectify the inequities that make men the disposable sex. Me…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:55 PM
4

Feminism is no less self-centered & dogmatic about male gender roles than anyone else. Plus, as you say, they assume we can be whoever we want with a snap of the fingers because we're just so damn privileged.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:28 PM
2

If you want to stick your genitals and your money in a meat grinder with your wife's finger on the switch, be my guest.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:46 AM
2

This display of common sense will last only up until the socialist apparatchiks tied to the white house demand the SPLC be consulted again.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 01:51 AM
7

DONT GET MARRIED.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 12:43 AM
2

The NAFALTs provide cover and support for the hateful supremacists. Feminists have happily painted all men as patriarchal rape beasts for decades, and I've never seen the NAFALTs wringing their hands over it or put up one peep of protest. If they don't like being generalized, they can stand up to the hateful supremacist leadership of their movement and reform the movement. I have no fucking sympathy for people, be they man, woman, or whatever, who gives aid and comfort to supremacists.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:03 PM
6

This is misogynist. Clearly those children were hitting their mother's fists with their eye socket. Women never do anything - ANYTHING - wrong.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:45 PM
3

Because a muscular, athletic dude who works out every day could very easily score worse than somebody who never exercises. It doesn't differentiate for body type. Obesity is a health risk but BMI isn't a good way to measure it.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:56 AM
7

Well, the BMI is basically useless but not because of who came up with it.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 08:36 PM
-2

So, opinions you disagree with = must be a sock account? Cool story bro.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:39 PM
1

I had very low expectations for this but it was actually pretty good, though not without faults.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:30 PM
4

Like it or not, they have as much right to free speech as we do. I'm sure sensible feminists don't like the "kill all men" crowd, either. The difference is that MRAs and anti-feminists actually criticize our extremists while feminists cover for and follow theirs.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:35 PM
7

Sure, I have my evidence right here… PATRIARCHY! RAPE CULTURE! STRANGER DANGER! WAR ON WOMEN! YAAAAAAARRRRGGGHHH! That is all.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:24 PM
6

They don't. Actually most women in general don't care about the health and welfare of men.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:20 PM
8

WTF WHY CAN'T YOU FUCKING ASSHOLES REALIZE FEMINISM SUPPORTS MEN!?!?!??!?!?!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:56 PM
1

Actually I agree somewhat. Feminism isn't about women, it's about forcing both women & men into a very narrow and rigid set of choices which are more or less aligned with the desires of the political Left.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 02:14 PM
14

Agree with every word, except for Mr. Harlan's meaningless assertions about how "few" women identify as feminist. It doesn't matter if women call themselves feminist. Most women, and too many men, are immersed in feminism & gynocentrism and will fight to defend female privilege no matter what they call themselves. Some of the most bullheaded gynocentrists I've ever dealt with said they disagreed with feminism.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:46 PM
10

Woman generalizes men as scummy drug addicts & pines for the men of her grandfather's generation. Of course, not one iota of self-awareness as to the generations of shitty female behavior that may be inspiring men to change, or the amount of feminist indoctrination & political advocacy that has caused us to avoid acting like stoic gentlemen.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:34 PM
6

Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Young men are strongly motivated by sex, and many will do whatever it takes to find attractive partners. Since many women have decided douchebags are who they want to have sex with, voila, more douchebags. If these women wanted kind, respectful men, they would seek out these men.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:00 PM
5

Men's rights and women's rights are not in opposition. Feminism is a sworn enemy of men's and women's rights. There's decades of evidence of this for anyone with an open mind who cares to look. If you doubt feminism opposes women's rights, look at how much feminism attacks conservative & libertarian women as well as stay at home moms.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:20 PM
15

No, the mistake was that other laws, such as alimony/child support/child custody did not change. The current situation makes divorce easy and incentivizes women to pull the trigger, because she is virtually guaranteed custody as well as cash & prizes. Like any financial contract, the marriage contract needs to have penalties associated with breaking it.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:45 PM
7

There are far more herbivores in Japan than there are MGTOWs in the us. Do we see ANY reaction from Japanese women, questioning whether they need to change? No. Do we see any recognition from Western women that they need to change? No, except for a few Mra - friendly females like Girl Writes What or Helen Smith or Susanne Venker. We have an entire society designed to tell women that nothing is their fault and they can do no wrong. In this culture MGTOWs are perceived as bitter neckbeards who can…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 09:02 PM
11

My understanding is that tons of Japanese women are also turning away from relationships, so I don't believe this is as much of a "man strike" as gets bandied about in the manosphere. Also, it is a delusional fantasy to think MGTOWs are "punishing" women. Women will simply look down on MGTOWs, spin the hamster, and keep doing what they are doing. I am an MGTOW but men should do it for themselves. Not live in some dreamworld that women are going to change in reaction.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:10 PM
1

Standard
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:39 PM
1

Suggestion: If you all are really concerned about "The Red Pill" name, why not email the documentarian and politely lay out your case?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:20 PM
1

Well, we can say the same about many, many social causes inside and outside gender issues.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:09 PM
-2

Yeah, I understand your perspective. Feminists are generally a bunch of halfwit supremacists. I'm not trying to equate feminism with the mrm.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:34 PM
3

Persons associated with conspiracy theories and the entheogen movement were using "red pill" as a metaphor before the manosphere even existed. Nobody owns the metaphor, other than the people who made the matrix movie.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:32 PM
3

Persons associated with conspiracy theories and the entheogen movement were using "red pill" as a metaphor before the manosphere even existed. Nobody owns the metaphor, other than the people who made the matrix movie.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:31 PM
8

Actually, no. The Red Pill metaphor was being used on other manosphere sites like the Spearhead before AVfM started using it. I don't think it's a pissing contest, as I don't think anyone "owns" the metaphor other than the creators of the Matrix movie. Persons associated with conspiracy theories and the entheogen movement were using "red pill" as a metaphor before the manosphere even existed.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:30 PM
30

Women in many parts of the world experience horrible restrictions to their human rights. It is questionable to me whether these are best handled as "women's issues" or as human rights violations, since in many cases men experience restrictions in these parts of the world. And you avoid the "man vs woman" connotations. By the way, I feel the same way about "men's rights" classification. Let's advocate for human rights.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:49 PM
7

Any man, or woman, who looks at a little boy and sees a rapist says way more about him than it does anyone else. Check out this site for more from this pervert. www.owtk.com
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter