TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LockSlight142 Archive

View 1 post and 143 comments by LockSlight142 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
35

LockSlight142/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 05:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Still waiting for you to provide me with a quote that will suffice. All I’m seeing is hypotheticals and things that don’t undermine the quote where it’s says; “the findings do not undermine the results of the speed dating test”. “One SUCH alternative”, again being the nail.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 08:07 PM
1

Was this your attempt at trying to make me feel bad by ostracizing me or something? Lmao. Please keep this up I mean this sincerely. It is absolutely hilarious.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 08:02 PM
1

You don’t speak for all of science. Also, I’d love for you to find a source that backs up what you’ve just said. Unfortunately for you, that’s very clearly not what’s happening. You’re obviously trying to make women look better than they are, failed in doing so and now are clinging on for dear life to not admit it. Let’s both come together and remember that we are both humans, and we make mistakes. I have made a few spelling errors for starters.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 08:01 PM
1

You?
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:54 PM
1

Provide a source where it effectively encompasses what all you’ve just said. I think you’re wrong and you know it.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:53 PM
1

Yup, I know. Link it all you want, but this is all voided based off the quotes I provided in the closing part of the source. “The findings do not undermine the results of the speed dating paradigm” Just curious, but this isn’t about you desperately trying to be viewed as a victim because hot men won’t date you, or something, right?
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:49 PM
1

..But they didn’t as demonstrated by the quotes I shared with you. As claimer you have the burden of proof. You have not be able to share any proof so you are automatically wrong. I STRONGLY suspect you know this and just don’t want to admit it.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:45 PM
1

Sure did, but then I saw the results of the analysis. You’re clearly demonstrating you either haven’t looked at the full article, did not understand what the findings were, or are deliberately lying to avoid having to admit you’re in the wrong.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:42 PM
1

No you’re not, you’re just trying to act clueless because you know you’ve lost. The quote in particular where they say “the findings do not undermine the speed dating test”, which showed that men and women think about looks similarly, is the nail in the coffin.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:40 PM
1

The studies linked in the article? The speed dating test being one of them. I hate to break this to you, but you’re wrong and it’s high time to save face and just admit it. Everyone’s wrong eventually. Not a big deal.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:37 PM
1

I did. However, they said the findings were not conclusive. Sorry but however you slice it you’re wrong. Also, not sure why you’re editing your comment instead of responding directly? A desperate attempt to get me to not respond? Nevertheless, that’s not happening.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:35 PM
1

Yes I did. It just doesn’t align with your view point so you’re desperately trying to deflect. Provide a source for your other statement.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 07:30 PM
1

Of course personality matters, but on the list I’d argue it’s towards the bottom and it’s not magically higher on a woman’s list than a man’s. If you’re ugly, you’re really shit out of luck. I’m not sure what you’re trying to say in this next paragraph (maybe you can clarify?) Those romantic films always have some hot ass dude that doesn’t exist outside of Hollywood. (Robert Patterson in Twilight and Ryan Gosling in the Notebook just to name a couple. Both are super tall, extremely good looking …
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 04:01 PM
1

All I’m saying is women do not inherently care about looks less than men like this wave of virtue signaling women and ugly blue pillers try to cope and say, as there’s no evidence. Of course they also care about personality, just like men do, but it’s not going to save you if you’re ugly or not elite in some other category, like height and wealth for example.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:50 PM
1

What?
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:43 PM
1

I’d rather not disclose that info for everyone here. I can DM you and we can talk there.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:48 AM
1

Depends on how you define several. For me I think I’ve talk to about 50 different people my whole life. I’m now 21. Like how do you mean? My looks?
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:46 AM
1

I’ve asked out several, had several more act like they really liked me, then would flake out or gaslight me into thinking that they didn’t. So it’s been a hellva ride. Before that, in high school and school in general they wouldn’t even make eye contact with me or acknowledge I existed so I guess I’m getting somewhere.
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:41 AM
0

You’re lucky you went through a period where you got better looking. If I ever tried to fuck those women who made fun of me I’d be thrown in jail!
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 03:13 AM
1

Oh believe me.. I know lol. We’re you lucky enough to have them remind you repeatedly as well?
/r/AllPillDebate13/09/23 02:48 AM
1

Again, here’s the same quotes: “it remains unclear whether partner attractiveness is always more important to men than it is to women.” “It is important to note, however, that the current findings do not undermine the speed-dating paradigm.”
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 11:05 PM
1

Whoops, another set of typos. I meant to say I was inferring it based off these two comments where you basically outright say that it’s a formal debate, then it’s not. When pointing out you use of ad hominem attacks: “And again, pointing out an opponent’s error in an effort to undermine their credibility in the eyes of the audience is perfectly acceptable in formal debate.” When asked if this is a formal debate or not: “It isn’t, but if it were, what I did (point out opponent error) would not be…
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 11:04 PM
1

Again with the deflecting. It quite literally doesn’t say that (see my quote yet again) and also, you the claimer couldn’t show evidence so you are wrong. It’s okay to admit you’re wrong you know right?
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:51 PM
1

Oh my lord. You obviously were inferring that this is a formal debate. I think at this point it would be best for you to save face and admit where you’re wrong, because I’m going to find it and call you out on it every single time.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:44 PM
1

It literally does. When they said the results don’t support speed dating paradigm, which my original quote showed. Even if it didn’t you would still be wrong because you, the claimer, admitted the results are mixed.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:41 PM
1

Lolololol. Pathos and Ethos is in no way related to what you were doing. You were using ad hominem attacks. I have quoted multiple. Stop deflecting. You did claim this was a formal debate actually, when you were trying to deflect and act like you weren’t using logical fallacies. “And again, pointing out an opponent’s error in an effort to undermine their credibility in the eyes of the audience is perfectly acceptable in formal debate.”
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:38 PM
1

Nope they don’t actually as quoted by them, which I then showed you. If you believe this conclusion, (you didn’t earlier, conveniently, nevertheless see the “on average” comment again) then you are still wrong as you are still the original claimer with the burden of proof. I hope you know that no amount of deflecting changes this.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:31 PM
1

Again, that’s not just what you said. You said “you don’t even know that” which is a personal jab which fits the definition of an ad hominem attack. Also, when you called me a blurred out name. So just to be clear, it’s not a formal debate, but also is a formal debate?
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:27 PM
1

You are again incorrect. The quotes literally say the results did not prove anything and you yourself agree that it is mixed. As the person with the burden of proof, you are wrong. I can keep going all day, eventually you are going to need to admit your mistake.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:25 PM
1

It doesn’t need to be a formal debate to point out a persons use of logical fallacies in place of an argument. That’s not just what you did however. You added a personal jab at the end because you’re upset. But wait I thought this wasn’t a formal debate? Now it is? You other comment said “this isn’t a formal debate”
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:22 PM
1

You can pretend and say that all you want, but the quotes I cited did prove this, and no I’m not looking at the other links, as the original source said that the results as a whole are inconclusive. Lastly, yes you did; “On average, women do tend to put more weight on non - physically characteristics.”
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 10:04 PM
1

Try to spin it all you want, but you very clearly were taking a personal jab because I’m pissing you off. Also, I know you don’t really believe that because I misspelled “peer” that means that I’m unfamiliar with the topic and lost “credibility”, you just want to make up something to harp on because you have nothing. ;)
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:58 PM
1

And there it is. Well I’m glad you stoped lying about the fact that you’re using ad hominems. We’re getting somewhere! Mixed results, which means there’s not a consensus theory, which means you’re wrong.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:55 PM
1

Didn’t say that it was. Adding the little “you don’t even know that” implying that I’m stupid or of lesser intelligence, is.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:50 PM
1

And I gave that to you. Also, I don’t think that you realize the fact that because they couldn’t find any evidence, means that your point is automatically invalidated as you are the claimer with the burden of proof. Again with the ad hominem attacks. Keep ‘em coming I’m having a nice laugh. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:48 PM
1

It absolutely is. You very clearly tried to take a personally jab at me instead of talk about the greater point. I’ve linked a source on ad hominem attacks; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ad-hominem “in a way that is directed against a person, rather than against what they say” is one of the better examples.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:39 PM
1

Sure can. “it remains unclear whether partner attractiveness is always more important to men than it is to women.” “It is important to note, however, that the current findings do not undermine the speed-dating paradigm.” (See the top section where they say the speed dating paradigm proves both men and women care equally about looks)
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:36 PM
1

Oooo and here is her first ad hominem! Yes I was spelling it wrong. This would fit with the definition I used earlier of the word called a “mistake”. Sorry, but that’s not how this works. You just contradicted yourself twice in this paragraph. You just said it supports something in one sentence, then another in another sentence. The study says there’s no evidence to prove your point, so you’re wrong as you are the claimer and have the burden of proof. Also, I fail to see where the study says any…
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:27 PM
1

Do me a favor hun, take a deep breath and calm down. I can tell this is the first time someone has called you out on your female bullshit, but we’re going to work through this together. You’re right I made a spelling error. You made an error linking a study that proves my point and actually agreed with my point earlier, (again see the bottom) let’s just admit this and move on.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:16 PM
1

Again, how a pier reviewed study works is they first make the claims, then get to the data. Scroll to the end and you will see the results which show the results were inconclusive. You also said in an earlier comment saying “of course the results were inconclusive”. Both of these points prove you wrong. You can try to frame it however you want, but you very clearly are trying to act like there’s a mass amount of proof and just don’t feel like linking it. We both know you’re lying so just stop an…
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 09:04 PM
1

Where are they then? So far you you linked one study that proved the opposite. I think I know where this is going. You as a woman are not oppressed. If you can’t find a bf as a woman, it’s entirely your fault. Luckily it a simple fix! Stop going for men that don’t exist, or are part of the 1%. So in other words, stop denying every man that’s asks you out because you want a man that doesn’t exist.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:40 PM
1

So why are you claiming women are special when you just said that they aren’t?
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:31 PM
2

Hun, those are the claims. The way a pier reviewed study works is it first introduces the claims, then they show the results. The results were at the bottom again saying something to the effect of “we don’t know”.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:31 PM
1

I did. You clearly didn’t. Scroll to the bottom before the sources you will see them say something to the effect of the result were inconclusive.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:29 PM
6

I’m so confused. Did you actually read the source or just the URL then paste it here? It says three different times that looks were as important for both sides and at the end, says it’s unclear if men care more than women. The speed dating test they did proved that both cared equally so I’m going to lean towards that being the answer.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:26 PM
5

I’m very clearly asking you to link them.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:12 PM
2

Where is this evidence then?
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 08:08 PM
1

Uh huh. I’m smiling and nodding.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 07:03 PM
1

That’s my point??????? It’s okay to say you’re wrong ya know? It’s better to save face at this point.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:56 PM
1

The entire point of the post went over your head. That is quite literally the point I was making. Blue pillers speak a lot from anecdotes, I thought to myself, I’m going to make a post about how I can do that too, showing that anecdotes don’t matter. Pretty simple concept.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:53 PM
1

It absolutely is. Sorry bro.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:50 PM
1

The lack of evidence is my evidence. Again, anecdotal experience is not evidence. Here is a link to show you what a logical fallacy and anecdotes are; https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:47 PM
3

Anecdotes are not evidence. Using anecdotes as evidence is a logical fallacy. My entire post was meant to show why blue pillers who use anecdotes as evidence are automatically wrong.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:41 PM
4

It was clearly sarcastic? Did you not read the last part of my post where I said “stop saying things without evidence to back them up”?
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:37 PM
5

The fact that he probably read the “anecdotal” part of my post and still thought to comment that is absolutely hilarious.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 06:25 PM
3

Yep I know. I will hire an escort eventually so it’s cool.
/r/AllPillDebate12/09/23 05:30 PM
1

Mine is too. My friend said he went.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 05:01 PM
1

Well okay
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 05:00 PM
1

I have yet to go. Would you like to come with me?
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:57 PM
1

Not sure if this was your gotcha attempt but nevertheless, it was funny.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:57 PM
1

Sure thing, just like if you traveled to mars you’d see the fairies.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:56 PM
1

Where is it then? The evidence for what you’re saying seems on par with the fairies on mars.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:47 PM
1

Arguing with people on this subreddit and also the way you are acting like you’ve succeeded in life, on this particular topic.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:46 PM
1

Exactly, because there’s no evidence for either.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:41 PM
1

Nope, I definitely tell using context clues and things like that. Not 100% certain mind you, but pretty close.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:41 PM
1

You just saying, “reality proves it” without any sources, is not an argument. I can just say fairies live on mars because reality proves it.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:39 PM
1

You just saying, “reality proves it” without any sources, is not an argument. I can just say fairies live on mars because reality proves it.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:39 PM
1

I have no clue? I can’t read minds unfortunately.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:33 PM
1

Just using your logic against you.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:33 PM
1

No clue. Most times when people are larping they want to pretend they’re someone else. Is this your attempt at a gotcha? Ask me why YOURE larping?
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:32 PM
1

Reality proves fairies live on mars.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:27 PM
1

This is a pretty simple concept. You are larping. You need to stop larping.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:27 PM
1

It’s because you want to pretend you aren’t an incel yourself.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:13 PM
1

It’s not an established fact. You can’t even prove it yourself.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:12 PM
1

Still waiting for your source. You should have provided about 6 different sources by now.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:47 PM
1

It’s because you’re larping.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:41 PM
1

You have to be trolling at this point? Everything needs evidence. The only reason we know the world is round and that it’s a known fact, is because there’s evidence to support it. Otherwise we could go around saying fairies live on mars and there’d be nothing wrong with it.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:34 PM
1

I never said I was trying to make you angry? You already are angry my friend.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:29 PM
1

No you don’t. You need to stop lying. If you actually knew what it is and read the link, you’d see something to the effect of if the claimer can’t show evidence, the lack of evidence is no evidence, and means the claimer is wrong.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:29 PM
1

Sure thing Mr Larp.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:25 PM
1

I totally did, dude. Here’s something called “The Burden of Proof”. One of the many logical fallacies you were ignorant of. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:24 PM
1

Sure thing Mr Larp.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:22 PM
1

The reasoning is because it’s brutally obvious when a man pretends to live a life he wants to live, online. You’re larping like you’re not also an incel like the rest of us.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:14 PM
1

Wow you are so mad I can sense your hatred through the screen. I must be the first person to call you out on your bullshit. I did though. Also, your claim you never could prove so you’re wrong as well.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:13 PM
1

Sure thing Mr Larp. Whatever you have to say to make your self hatred go away, I’m here for you.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:08 PM
1

You responded to me? I didn’t realize your main point because I didn’t anticipate someone missing mine so badly, but alas, here we are. Just admit you’re wrong. I did it, and do it all the time. Consider this free character development.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:08 PM
1

Hopefully you get over your self hatred and need to push it off to everyone else. I’m rooting for you buddy, truly.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:05 PM
1

We all know that. Like I said, your larping efforts have left you confused.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:03 PM
1

Ad hominem number two, you’re on a role! I do leave my house and I have a steady job. You pretending like incels are total losers is a convenient way to act like you’re right, without proving it.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:02 PM
1

See, your larping effort left you confused. My point wasn’t necessarily just about sex, but relationships. Still waiting on you to back up your claim by the way.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:55 PM
1

The link that you’re trying to spin that didn’t prove my point, even though it did.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:51 PM
1

Here’s your first ad hominem attack. I posted what proved my original point. You made a claim that most average men have sex, the onus is on you to prove it as I said. However that wasn’t even the main point.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:49 PM
1

My original point wasn’t even solely based off just that? You just randomly came in and started larping? You made the original claim, the onus is on you to prove it.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:46 PM
1

Again, the claim without evidence. There is no “poking holes” in it lol that’s just how the world works. Accept you’re wrong and let’s move on
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:38 PM
1

I do know what proof is lmao, you’re just trying desperately to not accept you’re wrong. You consistently saying random things without evidence is very strange, but unfortunately, not new for a bluepiller.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:29 PM
1

It’s okay to admit you’re wrong, you know? You are wrong and I proved it. Now it’s time to fess up.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:10 PM
2

It will eventually be solved.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 04:11 AM
2

They don’t though, and they do have sources for it. According to this, about 60% of men are single while only 30% of women, give or take. This is not a new take. You’re either larping or lying. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:42 AM
2

Okay so you have no source. Shocking, a bluepiller has no source.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 03:24 AM
1

Source?
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:55 AM
1

Congrats on being the exception I guess? Not sure what you want me to say.
/r/AllPillDebate26/08/23 02:33 AM
1

It absolutely does mean something. Most men don’t leave women because they know they’ll probably never get any pussy again. The divorce statistics are one example.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:42 PM
1

You got a source? Matter of fact do you have a source for anything or are you going to accept this loss that I’ve given you?
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:41 PM
1

Nope. The stats say that men will date anything. It really is that simple. There is a reason that stereotype of men being so horny they’ll screw anything exists.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:38 PM
1

The majority of men are whiny and bitter, because they’ve been treated like trash by women their whole lives. Just look at all the transgender men who want to go back to being a woman because it sucks to be treated like garbage just because you’re average. Also, both genders are hypergamous. You are not special just because you’re a woman
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:37 PM
1

Again, that’s an exception. I proved this is not how most men are earlier, multiple times.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:35 PM
1

Ok? What’s your point?
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:20 PM
1

Probably cause your “looksmatch” are total chads. Again, I proved you wrong earlier with my stats.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:20 PM
1

There is absolutely no way you were just bitching earlier then came out and said you’ve dated multiple guys including a guy you’re dating right now. I have to be living in a fantasy world there is just no way. I literally live in a Twilight Zone episode my god.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 10:14 PM
1

A majority are not. No stats show what you’re saying. As a woman if you can’t date, you have no one to blame except yourself. Either lower your standards out of the heavens, or look at yourself and ask yourself what are you doing that’s making fucking MEN of all things not lust over you.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 09:59 PM
1

She just wants to virtue signal and is also just out of touch with how it is to date as a man, since she’s a woman.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 09:52 PM
1

Congrats, you found the exception. Exceptions don’t make the rules. Look at my stats if you want to know how the world works.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 08:42 PM
1

Not dating a man below 6 ft, that looks average, rich or affluent, constantly charming and funny, manly all the time I could go on and on. Conversely, a man desires things that men do, but men have to settle or risk a life of loneliness.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 08:38 PM
2

It’s because I’ve heard this poor me tale from women many many times before and it’s always because she’s got ridiculous standards, won’t except any blame and think women are the pure hearted side of humanity.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 07:42 PM
3

Whatever you have to say to make yourself feel better hun.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 07:21 PM
4

Lmao. But for real though one day this will all change. When the sex robots are invented men won’t ever talk to a woman again. I cannot wait when all the attention we give them cause we’re horny is taken away.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 07:19 PM
8

Same. It blows my mind how they act and how they’re so privileged they don’t even realize it. Life sucks.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 07:11 PM
5

I never said anything about women wanting women. That is statistically not true and I’ve linked stats below. You may be an outlier but saying most women are like you is either a lie or you’re just clueless. Men are extremely shallow, yes, we’re just horny enough/ have to go after average women to get laid. I’m willing to bet any amount of money that you do get hit up. Do me a favor a think about all the guys in total that have ever hit you up, that aren’t total chads. Yes, believe it or not, tho…
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 07:10 PM
4

You saying “most women don’t care about height” is one of the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Also, nobody buys this “women mainly care about personality” bullshit anymore, so you can stop lying. The gig is up. Step down from your privilege for once and accept the fact that most men struggle in the dating market, because women are shallow and have the opportunity to indulge in their shallowness, unlike men. I’d bet that the amount of men that have hit you up within the past year just for simply e…
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 06:32 PM
4

I hate them. I seriously just hate them.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 06:20 PM
5

I cannot wait for this. One day 80/90% of men will never talk/think about a woman again and I’m genuinely envious of the future men that get to grow up never having to deal with women holding sex from them just because they’re average men.
/r/AllPillDebate25/08/23 06:15 PM
1

You don’t. The truth is I’d say most men hate women because we already have very little respect for you all. (we only care when we’re horny) Then you go around acting like you’re hot shit even though there’s nothing special about you.
/r/AllPillDebate24/08/23 01:43 AM
1

Only cause we’re horny. Not to be crude, but after an orgasm, those feelings go away. At the end of the day, the blame falls mostly on us men for being horny enough to act like they mean anything.
/r/AllPillDebate24/08/23 01:36 AM
0

Absolutely, but I just meant most women don’t go through 12 or 13 without one guy saying yes. Even if they’re a chad I’d be shocked that he wouldn’t at least pump and dump her. Perhaps I misunderstood a underlying point he made. Not sure.
/r/AllPillDebate23/08/23 11:33 PM
2

I didn’t say chad, I said men?
/r/AllPillDebate23/08/23 08:45 PM
6

I think this is just a revenge fantasy imo. Most women have no trouble having tons of guys and rejecting them. The one thing that seems constant is that women get used a lot
/r/AllPillDebate23/08/23 02:49 PM
2

Damn I wish I was a Chad. I’d have a body count of at least a 100
/r/AllPillDebate17/08/23 12:12 AM
2

I wonder what women you guys are around. The ones I’ve been around always made sure to call me ugly.
/r/AllPillDebate15/08/23 09:08 PM
2

Okay so you have no source. Got it.
/r/AllPillDebate22/07/23 02:01 AM
3

Source?
/r/AllPillDebate18/07/23 08:13 PM
8

Happens to the best of us. Sometimes I get into it with them too but then I just realize they’re a subset of humanity who probably just want to feel good about themselves by pretending they’re inherently different.
/r/AllPillDebate18/07/23 01:25 AM
11

There’s no point in arguing with them. Just let them virtue signal and pretend like looks are meaningless. Most people don’t believe that shit.
/r/AllPillDebate18/07/23 12:24 AM
1

It all just makes me laugh when I see a post like this because it reminds me these women get big heads cause a bunch of guy are talking to them, not knowing that damn near every girl has tons of options and it’s all just rooted to men being horny.
/r/AllPillDebate25/06/23 11:44 PM
1

You said you probably had a libido higher than 35% of men, I asked if you would fuck/date anything like men do and if you answered no, said that means you’re not as horny as 35% of men. Apologies if I worded it incorrectly but I’m curious to hear your answer.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 06:08 AM
1

What a sexist pig. Did he ever consider working on himself?? He’s not entitled to relationships you know?
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 05:17 AM
1

Old threads meaning…16 days old and readily available on the subreddit? Gee I don’t know good question.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 05:12 AM
1

This is anecdotal experience, of which, doesn’t disprove the stats that show that mainly the opposite type of guy can only date. If we want to use anecdotes, when I go outside the only guys I see dating are super tall or good looking. I also have a large friend group and the only guys that can even get a girl to look at them are the two who are 6’3 and 6’5.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 05:10 AM
0

Definitely single, as I think most men would if they couldn’t have sex. There’s really no other reason to date.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 05:06 AM
1

Sorry hun, but 16 days doesn’t shield you from being criticized. I know you’re a girl and so you’re not used to it, so consider this free character development!
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 05:00 AM
1

Exactly. I’d argue it’s almost entirely our fault for dating/fucking just about anything that identifies as female
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 04:56 AM
1

Sorry you had to talk to that guy. It’s seems you’re one of the rare types of women that only have 19 requirements.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 04:49 AM
1

I just witnessed a murder.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 04:35 AM
1

Would you fuck/date just about any guy as long as he was a guy? No? Then you’re not as horny as 35% of men.
/r/AllPillDebate16/06/23 04:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter