TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lodley Archive

View 4 posts and 83 comments by Lodley on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Everyone does that, if they had gotten new investors they might have survived. Failing businesses always try that, if there was actual fraud the liquidators would find it.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:14 AM

Most businesses fail. Just like that other UK women only business this looks like the first time Cherie Blair worked in the private sector and her first attempt at management, not the best start. She also doesn't have a background in investment or medicine, so a medical investment company looks like she was trying to retire into a vanity project.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:25 AM
1

Even if all 10 where true, literally only one only effects single women. Apart from unmarried women paying more for insurance than married women everything else is women in general and not specific to unmarried women.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:36 AM
8

Also wouldn't administer proscribed anti-biotics, this father put his beliefs in homeopath over his children's health.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:02 AM
27

This was shared before, its unsourced the original article from February doesn't name the student the university or the outcome. Save your anger for things that can be verified.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:57 AM
11

She was also banned from having unsupervised contact with young boys for two years This is what rape culture looks like...
/r/MensRights11/10/15 02:16 AM

I think the more appropriate analogy is if the hospital just gives you a random baby. That happened a few times in the early 90's and all hell broke loose. If someone wants a biological child or an adopted child that is their choice, its wrong to just force that choice on someone else.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:51 PM

Great comment, just observe don't vote np is there for a reason.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:49 PM
3

Why is this filed under "Fathers/Custody" when it should be filed under "Intactivism"?
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:45 AM
1

It was just part of a plea agreement, it's unfortunate but it happens when there is not a lot of evidence. One of the other subreddits that were talking about this story came up with a lot of examples of the same thing happening to male rapists.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:27 PM
3

2x about Schumer calling her actions rape and the overwhelming response was a negative downvote and mostly rabid responses telling me it's not rape. 2x returns 10 results for Amy Schumer since the rape story broke. One shows no comments, one has her in a list of female standups but the conversation doesn't seem to be about her. All the rest call her a rapist in the top comments. I've seen the comments you got downvoted on, but all of those people do clearly state that if the genders were reverse…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:41 PM

It was deleted, probably for breaking the rules. The general opinion is that it was a troll post. Anyone can post anything on that subreddit, don't take a screenshot as an endorsement. I'm sure if we saw the top comments after a few hours they would all be people pointing out she is a rapist.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:39 AM

Bring it up and people on 2x will tell you it's not rape and they don't mind being fucked while passed out That's just not true here is the 2nd and 3rd link on 2x about amy schumer, these are the ones specifically talking about that incident; all the top comments clearly think it was rape. Please don't make assumptions about other sub-reddits, that's what people do to /r/MensRights and it's not fair.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:30 AM

it's hard to believe that this hasn't resulted in a surge of ex-spousal murders People have a natural aversion to murder. Also with chases like this one (a father), forcing your child to go into foster care and have to deal with the trauma of one parent killing another really changes the calculus. Even though the system is unfair the system can be changed. His children and friends will understand and sympathize with what is happening to him, that won't be the same if he turns to murder. This guy…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:36 PM
6

Yea it looks like something they would do to appease helicopter parents. "We found out he lives by the school [ie. it's not weird please stop reporting this], has been seen with and without a beard [ie. if you see anyone just assume it's him and stop reporting people], drives a white car [ie. the head of the PTA said this to us and will get hell if we don't include it] and isn't on the sex offender lists as far as we know [ie. we did cursory glance at the sex offender register and he isn't liste…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:15 PM
6

The only source is a Facebook post. Just ignore the troll.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 10:25 AM

legally speaking, rape usually requires penetration Not in the state where it happened. It's a sane place were the definition of rape is sex without consent. In some states and for some government agencies that is the case unfortunately.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:23 AM
2

Yes but more specifically the mods seem to have a policy of removing anything that doesn't conform to a "patriarchy" conspiracy world view.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:36 PM

A two month old repost from a source with a misleading title From the original source "Both were cited for a misdemeanor, and authorities told 10News the 20-year-old man was arrested for violating probation"
/r/MensRights19/04/15 09:16 PM
1

you realize even whores don't come out and admit they don't care enough about you to respect you enough not to cheat It's just as easy to lie about their number of partners as their fidelity. If you cannot trust one then you cannot trust the other. I'm saying you should not use number of partners to predict cheating behavior because if they are going to cheat then they can just as easily lie about their number of partners.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:00 AM
2

you were making the comment that "correlation doesn't mean causation" I was making the comment that you shouldn't use number of partners to judge fidelity when you can just use fidelity to judge fidelity.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:52 AM

The fucking idiot retard Except in science (yes, science) there are methods by which you can conclude on the strength of a correlation I'm sorry do you have a study showing multiple partners leads to infidelity? I was unaware that was a serous theory. so goddamn retarded I just wanted to point to it and laugh wow you moderate /r/drunkenpeasants/ I love that show, smoke pan everyday.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:35 AM

Correlations are predictors They are not, a high number of sexual partners does not predict infidelity; even if infidelity correlates with a high number of sexual partners. strong justification to not concern yourself with promiscuous people if you desire someone who is not prone to infidelity This eludes faithful people who are promiscuous and exclude non promiscuous people that are prone to infidelity. Since fidelity can be tracked as easily as number of previous sexual partners, why would you…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:26 AM

If there's no connection at all with those two stats - none - there wouldn't be the correlation A correlation is a statistical connection, that statement literally says if they were not correlated they wouldn't be correlated. Which is just circular reasoning. a TAD more connected semantically than ice cream and murder The ice cream murder example is a classic explanation of correlation not being causation. In the summer both ice cream sales and murder go up both are thought to be caused by peopl…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:22 AM

I'm sorry that you're struggling with this, but them's the statistical facts Let us then ban ice cream and bread, for murder rises with ice cream sales and every murder has eaten bread.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:59 AM

correlation or causation is irrelevant Infidelity causes a large number of partners, not the other way around. the fact there's no direct causal link still doesn't change the fact That's the same line of thinking that says men are rapists and criminals. I'm dissapointed to see that same kind of thinking championed in the commons of this sub.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:38 AM

correlates Correlation does not imply causation. If you don't want to be with someone with a history of Infidelity fine, but don't use the number of partners as a proxy for that.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:13 AM
-1

small detail in his word choice Even if they talked about longevity, as you seem to be implying they meant, I think my point still stands. A large number of partners does not necessarily mean they were all short relationships and a small number of partners does not mean long relationships. My point is that you should not use the number of partners count for a proxy for some undesirable trait (infidelity or inability to form lasting relationships).
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:48 AM
1

women are more susceptible to the majority of STD's than men A large number of partners increases the risk of contracting an STD. However if you are concerned about STD's testing is a much better method. It's possible to have had many partners but practiced safe sex and remain STD free. It's also possible to get an STD from your first sexual encounter. Its fine to have a preference for people with few partners, just like it's fine to have a preference for people who have had many partners; just …
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:52 PM

the risk factor for infidelity is too high for comfort Having a large number of sexual partners does not mean infidelity. It's just as possible to have had 20 partners and never been unfaithful as it is to have had four partners and cheated on every single one.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:44 PM

It's a real problem there I think it's actually closer to a "moral panic" like how in America everyone was worried about people poisoning Halloween candy. The reason I think this is because I watched a lot of Japanese youtubers and every time one of the makes a video about public groping women either say it happened once to them or it happened to a friend. While that is a problem there are two things to keep in mind, first if you commute in Tokyo it's by rail and you probably take four trains a …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 09:03 PM
3

It states that men are effected by false accusations not actual groping. While I'm sure there are men who have been groped on the rail system, the current "moral panic" involves men groping women they don't know.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:50 PM
1

a pedant That will be my word of the day Either they agree it is never justified, or it can be justified You don't know what the spoiled rate on the survey was. So you only know the data they gave us, which was x% say it's never justified. I think you are being too much of a pedant. Here was my series of thoughts: oh no a large number of Muslims think support killing people for adultery oh it's just in those two countries (both crappy dangerous countries) oh it's even fewer people than the title…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 09:35 PM
4

If you don't get money then they took it down and your problem is solved. If they don't take it down, it's pretty easy to sue for slander, especially if you are on good terms with that ex.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 09:00 PM

If you looked at the paper to know the numbers are the same, then you should have also seen that the original title was wrong to begin with. Your paraphrasing that title further clouds the issue. Most Muslims in the survey said killing anyone for adultery is never justified.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:56 PM
3

legal advice from the Internet is generally a bad idea The only legal advice you should take from the internet is "go talk to a lawyer"
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:53 PM

Pictures of Facebook posts and Yahoo answers has the credibility of the writing on a bathroom stall. I wouldn't get upset over things that might not have happened.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 10:17 PM
4

more sense to hire more men for that role The article said they have to pass the same entrance requirements. A women that meets the requirements is just as capable of border patrol as a man. specifically for the task of searching women There is probably not enough searches to justify that. For instance police officers do pat-downs and searches but that is a small portion of their job. The flipside is that you don't want to have to wait somewhere for an hour to get the search woman to where the a…
/r/MensRights13/12/14 10:05 PM
3

I'm not sure why you replied to me I was just trying to help clarify.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:42 PM
1

A college offers degrees related to a particular field of study, a University is a collection of colleges. UIC has 16 colleges according to their website. Also if the number of departments are an indication of a college's size, then the Jane Addams College is one of the smallest.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:20 AM
2

Where they're rubber stamped Twitter already rubber stamps some harassment complaints. My point is that this is not much different from how twitter operates now. I personally watch the #GamerGate harassment patrol, and the only difference is I have to bookmark someones account to check back and see if they were suspended.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:03 PM
8

It's not as bad as the title makes it seem. People can submit reports directly to WAM, WAM can then report them to twitter. WAM does not have the ability to take down tweets. WAM does have the ability to see how reports where handled and that's really the only difference between them and other groups like #GamerGate's harassment patrol.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:47 PM
50

This article is 14 years old
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:08 AM
1

In America the difference in physical size and ability is often looked at when determining the severity of punishment.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:08 PM

They didn't say it was ok for a woman to hit a man. They did say it was worse that 'this' man hit 'this' woman, because he was significantly larger and a trained athlete. Cenk is saying someone didn't think about what they were saying, while not thinking about what he was saying.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:54 PM
19

If no one was rapped anymore there would still be 22 million women in america that have been raped. That number won't go down until some of those women die. Things like yearly stats are more relevant.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:06 PM
3

LOL I did not catch that. I think the important part is what the community up-voted for comments, as a way to gauge XX's feelings on the issue.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:00 AM

I thought they had the same reaction /r/mensrights had [http://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/24vwlf/wait_a_second_did_amy_schumer_rape_a_guy/](Here is a link to the story in XX). If you sort by top comments you have to go eight people down until someone says it wasn't rape. Even then that person doesn't believe in "too drunk to consent" regardless of gender. edit: my link is coming out weird but it works
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:21 AM

Just have a unisex dress code. If it's so inappropriate for a boy to wear sparkly shoes, why is it fine for a girl?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:47 PM
1

I wouldn't call 1 out of 8 (12.5%) a "culture" that person is clearly the outlier
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:03 AM
2

showed her at first denying sex with Jaime and then accepting it But this is the only time people are calling it rape, because there is a world of difference between those previous encounters and this one. leave any trauma and didn't make her resent Jaime Within the setting of the show, women are not given a choice. Cersei would have been raised to believe that her chastity was both her responsibility and her only value. That creates a very different response to rape then our culture. To acknowl…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:56 AM
5

I disagree with both you and that youtube video. Just because they currently had a sexual relationship and sometimes she likes to resist a little does not invalid her lack of consent in this scene. I feel that in that scene, as shown, she was forced into sexual contact against her will, there for rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:54 PM
9

While Cersei wasn't raped in the books. I think that the way it was portrayed in the episode was rape. She clearly resisted and said no, then while it was happening she stopped resisting to get it over with, that is still rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 10:21 PM
2

An important question. Does the father have custody in the US? If this is a case of the mother taking the children to Japan where the US custody arrangement won't be honored, then there is legal recourse if the children enter the US jurisdiction again. However if this is a case of the Japanese courts awarding custody to the mother, then nothing really changes when she takes them to the US.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 09:02 PM
2

Hmmm /r/spacedicks (warning: NSFW, Gore) isn't listed, either is jailbait a former subreddit that was on CNN. Also that one that was just picture up peoples skirts, creepshots maybe I'm not sure what it was called. edit: just saw the banned section had those two in there
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:06 AM
7

There are a lot of sensational headlines about this story, but the facts are very boring. The male student was taking an online class, specifically to not have to interacted (in person) with women. This class however does have one in person group activity. He requested to be exempt from the in person activity, and given an alter net assignment. The school told the professor that the student had to be accommodated, because there was already an alter net assignment that is given to students studyi…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:24 AM
1

Make sure you're logged in. I have noticed that /r/mensrights is usually on the second or third page for me. I think it has to do with the votes compared to my other subreddits. Like the more popular subreddits are weighted differently.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:48 AM

Some people from /r/gaming, myself included consider her a troll. She is not very familiar with gaming in general and tries to whip up controversy to drive views. I feel it's best to just ignore her and not amplify her voice by talking about her. I down voted all her videos.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 09:40 AM
2

Sorry about that I usually try to check sources on stuff before I put it up. The impression I had was that this was used as a defense from a wrongful termination suit. When in fact it is not covered by the gender discrimination laws. What I gathered from the court opinion is that some form of sexual harassment would have had to take place for a gender discrimination case. It really just says that because your spouse tells you to, is a valid excuse to fire someone.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:30 AM
1

IMF does not get tax revenue. It's funded by member donations, it's purpose is to specifically improve the economy.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:00 PM
3

I was beaten at least once a week, always disciplinary spankings. Mostly with shoes but also open hands, wooden and metal spoons, and a metal yard stick. My sister would also be hit with a comb if she wouldn't hold still when my mother did her hair. My brother and sister would also hit me and hold me down, then spit on me or tickle me till I threw up. My sister, five years older, would also make me punch her and if it wasn't very hard she would hit me (to "toughen me up"). The beatings stopped g…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:56 AM
2

I've read that the prenup has be signed months before the wedding. The justification is that otherwise people will pay for the wedding and then be force into a prenup with unfair terms. Always go engaged-> prenup-> Wedding planning
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:43 AM
4

I think he means women going to the bathroom in large groups, even when they don't really have to "go". Is not the fault of the solo girl that has to go so bad she uses the men's bathroom.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:34 AM
2

Yesterday 2 days ago 4 days ago /r/MensRights is well aware of this news story.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:09 AM
9

Repost I still don't think this belongs in /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:00 AM
3

I think I need to apologize to my English teachers. They were all right when they said bad punctuation and capitalization would distract from your subject matter.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:12 AM
2

Imagine in the anonymous comments section of your blog people threaten you with rape and violence. Never having to prove that they are men like they say or that they are not all the same person. But when you go to a public personal forum you are not "silenced". It's almost like those commentors are some kind of fringe element.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:11 AM
2

I don't know if that was a thing or just something they made up for G.I. Jane. The only reference I found was this "However, according to Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, author of On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, Israeli soldiers reacted with uncontrollable protectiveness and aggression after seeing a woman wounded." From wikipedia Women in combat
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:24 PM
1

comment has been deleted
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:13 AM
35

The sexual assault board will be able you expel you from the university. That's a big deal if you sunk 20-50k in school already.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:59 AM
2

Yes gay parents should be able to get custody. But after reading that it seems less like the dad was a bigot and more like he is desperate to get any amount of custody.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:39 PM
-24

I can't really blame the kids for not wanting to see him. I understand you have a right to know if your kids are really yours, but by doing that he's also saying that it matters if they were his or not and that his love was conditional. I'm just saying that I can see how the kids could be pretty pissed at him.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:17 PM
10

They said it was slightly more than if his children had died.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:12 PM
0

would have broken with current confidentiality laws to allow the government to interview the abuser about the applicant. So right now you get a visa if you say you were raped, no need to check for an alibi? 80 percent of female farmworkers interviewed had been subject to sexual assault or harassment These are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:49 PM

The argument has always been that it is impossible to effectively limit the impact to one state. It's one of the catch-all for federal powers. For example California has legalized pot, under certain conditions. However the federal DEA still busts pot dispenser and growers in California. The rational is that pot is illegal under federal law and that pot might leave the state.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:54 AM
7

Well that's fine because without sons when they get old and can't work... Oh right. That's why it's illegal in some places to tell people if they are having a boy or a girl.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:36 AM
9

I don't know why I thought that was so funny, but it was
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:30 AM
3

It's just Philip Zimbardo shelling his new book, this is the guy that made the crappy "Stanford prison experiment". I don't think he's a credible source for anything.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:38 PM
1

The 10% isn't accurate closer to 3.7% http://jech.bmj.com/content/59/9/749.long. But overall a good video. I couldn't add a link on the youtubes, now I'm one of those people that just makes claims.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:23 PM

I'm in Nebraska, showing names and photos of people accused of committing sex crimes is almost always done here YMMV.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:57 AM

he's just trolling
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:45 AM

If the mother doesn't list the father on the birth certificate, he has no right to the child. If she wants to adopt the child out the father might never know he had a child. There is no way for a man to get a child if the mother doesn't want it.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:33 AM
14

I just thought it was funny, after people were upset when that a male panel in the senate was discussing birth control. That this article is written by a women, with the point counter point both given by women, who best to talk about foreskin?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter