TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LogicOverEmotion0 Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by LogicOverEmotion0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You assumed a very expensive watch. They say our assumptions are a reflection of our own biases. There are many good looking watches at the same price as a nice bouquet of flowers.
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/26 06:02 PM
2

You're contradicting yourself. Obviously if they are desperate for sex they value it highly.
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/26 05:41 PM
5

Of course people who view sex as a gift are lacking it. You are correct there. The projection is when you call people pathetic for valuing sex. Do you see the difference?
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/26 03:11 PM
-4

The female equivalent would be a watch.
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/26 03:02 PM
6

It appears you have a vested interest in shaming men who value sexual acts, which suggest your are projecting the shame of your own sexuality onto them.
/r/RedPillWomen30/06/26 02:59 PM
9

I rebuke you and your ad hominems in the name of Jesus Christ. I pray God teaches you critical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 12:02 AM
7

Are you claiming the blackpill isn't true?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 01:21 PM
-3

Correct the lies about intersexual dynamics. Edit: ...and the goal of everyone downvoting is to mask the lies of intersexual dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:41 PM
8

Thats quite the strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 09:26 PM
5

There is no benefits to having kids as a women Yes, continuing the human race is of no benefit to a women. Millions of years of evolution and striving to create existence, but it turns out, giving birth has zero benefit to women. Think about that for a second. In her mind, continuing the human race is of no benefit to women. Fortunately, her mother was sane enough to not share the same sentiment or she wouldn't be here to give such an einstein level take.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:59 PM
16

Lets analyse the womanese here. We need to stop calling it a “male loneliness epidemic” "calling it that devalues the feelings of women." Translation: "There is an epidemic of men who are lonely, but don't call it that, because it highlights a situation where men are victims, and it makes us feel left out of the victimisation opportunity, which takes away the attention and power we so desperately crave." Wanting to be the biggest victim in a room, so much so that the phrase "male loneliness epid…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 07:03 PM
5

Saying men are as picky as women is a ludicrous, nonsensical take. Like most feminist minded women you are trying to gaslight men by: Downplaying the fact that women have the dating game in a chokehold, meaning they can date and or solely sleep with HUNDREDS of men should they choose. Gaslight men into thinking by wanting a partner willing to have sex with them, they are somehow being picky. ...and, that by wanting this partner they are being just as picky as women who have HUNDREDS of dating op…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 06:17 PM
1

Thats not an example of men lying when giving dating advice. Neither is it an honest representation of womems standards...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:59 PM
0

Can you show me these men who supposedly hate promiscuous women then?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:42 PM
1

Two entirely separate things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:20 PM
3

Interesting, can you give an example of this alleged dating advice where men are lying to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:50 PM
1

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:39 PM
2

Men constantly claim they hate women who have casual sex f This is a ridiculous sentiment. I dont think the majority of men / red pill men think like this. Why would men hate promiscuous women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:38 PM
16

Yes, because women are always right.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:30 PM
3

Whats wrong with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:42 PM
2

I wouldn't call it cognitive dissonance, its just a biological need.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 12:38 PM
0

Interesting, thanks for sharing. Edit: Though I will add you mentioned nothing about being assertive, not being a push over, creating sexual chemistry, leading the interaction or any other masculine traits. You did mention being independent which is good but everything else you mentioned could apply to a friend or coworker, and thus won't create sexual attraction. But interesting response nonetheles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:41 PM
1

And if it is, are you open to discussing the idea that you could be wrong? I simply asked you a question, and you're asking me If I'm prepared to be wrong? Interesting response. Regardless, you've listed the 5 below so I'll respond to that directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:38 PM
2

Not exactly. Just advice from people is just less reliable compared learning through general cultural absorption. It will always seem inconsistent and contradictory because individuals aren't representative of huge chunks of the population. You're doing it again. "Its not that womens advice is bad, its just all advice is bad and contradictory." You are evading the point and thus deflecting. I think women's attraction is more meaning based and holistic rather than strictly visual, which confuses …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:32 PM
4

Interesting, could you give the top 5 pieces of advice about being attractive to women, ranked in order of importance?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:44 PM
2

You’re selecting sentences that you crafted to fit your narrative and are ignoring advice from women that has worked for men. Interesting, could you share this alleged advice from women that has worked?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:40 PM
0

Advice in general doesn't work because people are individuals, So your response is "its not that womens advice is bad, its just that all advice is bad..." Thats just dodging accountability by deflecting. Do you agree that womens "advice" is bad because it is mostly virtue signalling, and "idealistic poetry," rather than information aimed to help men? You did not engage with any of OP's points, instead choosing to deflect the argument entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:21 PM
–

Your point is that science can make mistakes, therefore the redpill and all its supporting studies are wrong? Quite a reach. I guess the earth could be flat too because science makes mistakes... Ever hear of the fundamental attribution error? That's pretty much my issue with alot of this red pill stuff. You also believe the redpill is wrong because every time its right, its simply a situational coincidence, as per the premise of fundamental attribution error? In summary, your reasons against the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 12:04 AM
1

Missed this. Was temporarily banned for calling out misandry. Funny to see all the upvotes your flawed logic received. It looks like accountability has flown out the window... No, because fault implies that a mistake was made. Yes, a mistake was made. His intention was to orgasm. He tried to orgasm during sex, and he failed to orgasm. Failing to do something you are trying to do is literally a mistake. Mistakes carry fault. If I am responsible for something being done, I take on the fault for it…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 10:04 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:27 AM
–

This does not make any sense. Please expand. You were the one who asked me to expand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:15 AM
1

I like how you reframed it from censorship and deleting posts to calling it "harsh pushback." Quite interesting. His point was about censorship not about pushback so this critique is invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:48 AM
–

Asking us to dissect and give you an etymology class on the difference between the word "ask" and "demand" is unnecessary... I answered your questions explaining OP's intent, as well as what is being "demanded" in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:40 AM
1

Could you clarify which part you disagree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:26 AM
–

Read the last sentence OP said and you will understand. He is saying one day men will demand genuine interaction from women in order for women to date them, so boycotting instagram on an individual level is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 12:03 AM
0

Self aggrandizing? Not really, when you consider the decay which is modern dating, especially coupled with the pure naivete and gullibility of the average man when it comes to women. The red pill essentially changes the worldview of an average man from the hollywood idealistic and pedestalised view of women to the realistic and most importantly, human view of women. Humans are imperfect. By displaying these imperfections, men can now take women off the pedestal of perfection hollywood put them o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:59 PM
–

By demand he means set a standard. He is using the term euphemistically.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:44 PM
1

I don’t see that they make the underlying assumption that most men are like that. To the contrary, they generally seem to argue that most men are not like that, and need to be trained to be. Right, because most men are blue pilled and believe in hollywood romance initially until taught otherwise. The actual red pill assumption is that women are wicked stupid bitches who only want bad men, and unfortunately, the only way to get laid is to sacrifice your innate moral manliness and stoop to the lev…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 10:24 PM
1

The redpill is a male dating guide on women for men. Since it is about women it obviously does not include men in its assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 10:19 PM
6

Can you link the post? Thats a ridiculous take and a very stupid sentiment if this is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:31 PM
0

When have you ever seen a woman say she was wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 09:29 PM
3

I would say it’s largely his responsibility. Then it would be his fault since its largely his responsibility. Thats how accountability works right? If I am responsible for something being done, I take on the fault for its lack of completion
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:30 PM
4

It would be theirs. I agree, so I think when women villainise men for their own inability to orgasm, its unfair. In your case you take accountability for it which is fair, and a healthy way to view sex. Just like I know that I even when a man IS trying I have a high failure rate because my brain gets in the way. I still want to have fun. Do you ever actively try to achieve orgasm via your own actions with a man rather than only passively trying to receive an orgasm from a mans actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 07:23 PM
3

Sure. Can you answer the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 05:18 AM
1

If a man doesn't orgasm during sex with a woman whos fault is it? His or hers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 04:39 AM
-11

Women’s pleasure is a literal afterthought or written off as an optional chore. The clitoris exists for women’s pleasure alone and it’s not always included in a sexual encounter at all. I keep seeing this same sentiment from women here. So, If a man doesn't orgasm during sex with a woman whos fault is it? His or hers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 04:38 AM
-1

If a man doesn't orgasm during sex with a woman whos fault is it? His or hers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 04:36 AM
1

When i ask them why they are angry, they answer that they aren't angry - they are passionate. And i'm flabberghasted by it. This is just a common case of cognitive dissonance from an emotional person. Emotional people do not see logic, they only see their emotions. They then justify their emotions to mask their cognitive dissonance such as in the example you mentioned. He is shouting angrily yet telling you he isn't angry. All humans start out with varying levels of cognitive dissonance which we…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 01:08 AM
1

The blue pill has no merit. It is the mainstream narrative built on women's virtue signalling. Of course, its false. Remember the blue pill is not that personality helps in dating, its that looks don't matter, and personality is everything...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:37 PM
1

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:33 PM
1

No, the black pill does not say personality has no value, simply that looks are extremely important as a prerequisite. Not sure what you mean by AWALT but since your blackpill take is so wrong I'm sure your red pill one is too. The blue pill essentially negates looks, status and money being factors saying its personality only that matters. Of course the blue pill was born from womens incessant virtue signalling and societies aid in this virtue signalling. Remember, the red and black pill only ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:31 PM
1

There is a difference between someone you find attractive, one you dont yet find attractive (meaning they are neutral) and someone you find unattractive, in the last case personality wont help. To most women, the average man is unattractive the same way to a spoiled rich kid who only eats at 5 star restaurants, a 3 star restaurant meal is unattractive. Since the average man is unattractive to the spoiled for choice average woman, personality is indeed irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:22 PM
–

"33% of women orgasm during sexual encounters." I also just want to point out that the man is responsible for his own orgasm during sex, therefore, the women is responsible for her own orgasm during sex. It is beyond ridiculous that women get away with blaming all their failings in life on men. It is genuinely remarkable how we have fallen so low as a society to have such adolescently minded adults with zero accountability roaming the earth. Many women claim its the mans job to make her orgasm. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 08:16 PM
0

This is a perfect encapsulation of how women view the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 07:43 PM
2

Thats funny. How many women do you think a man would have to approach to get sex on demand? Now how many for a woman to get it on demand?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:09 AM
1

Mediocre sex is the best case scenario for most women? Well for most men the best case scenario is their right hand... Nothing changes the fact that women can have sex on the demand, and men can't. So to then tell men who rarely (if ever) get to satisfy this urge that they need to value that urge less is simply a privileged perspective. Thats the point I am making. If you want to pivot to the dangers of casual sex for women thats fine, but do you acknowledge the point I am making?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 03:01 AM
1

Yes. Some men get off from doing that. But hold on, because lets not pretend women's sexual encounters are merely giving head and going home...But I'll entertain the logic behind your question. You are saying the sexual experience for a woman is lackluster. But you know what? A lackluster experience beats no experience. Regardless, this is off topic from my original point. To use another analogy, my point is simply that women have an unlimited access to food and are telling men with "scraps" tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:46 AM
0

Having a dude who doesn’t give a fuck if you exist shove his dick inside you and use you as an object doesn’t satisfy any type of thirst. If anything it’s incredibly unsafe and demeaning for your own mental health. The chances of what you’re describing as satisfying are laughable This is a "first world problem." You have such a high supply of sexual options that your only problem is mediocre sex. Meanwhile, a man with no sexual options doesn't even have the option of getting mediocre sex. Hence …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:38 AM
0

Most average men aren't even able to have hookups or casual sex consistently...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:30 AM
2

The point ks a woman has many men who are willing to habe sex woth her at any given moment. A man does not. Thetefore when a woman attemtps to dictate a mens sexuality, it comes from a llace kf privellege The average woman isn't getting 1000 Tinder likes in 15 minutes. There was an experiment done with an average women who achieved this. Even a severely obese woman got over 400 matches in 24 hours. You know how many matches an obese man is getting on tinder? Zero. Regardless, are you denying tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 02:28 AM
-2

Are you honestly trying to say it isn't easier for a woman to get sex then it is for a man? Thats just bad faith. There is not a man alive getting 1000 matches on tinder yet an average woman has been shown to be able to do that within 15 minutes... How many of those 1000 men do you think would be willing to have sex with her on the first meet up? the man we want to have sex with isn't interested in us. Like with the analogy above, assuming you are an average woman, there are hundreds of men who …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 09:32 PM
-2

I mean yeah there is more to a relationship than just sex. Or else you’d just be fucking somebody and leaving. Lets read between the lines. When women say theres more to a relationship than sex what they are saying is men shouldn't care about sex as much as they do. However, since women have the privilege of beinf able to have sex with whoever they want, their opinion on mens sexual desire is obsolete. Women's biological "thirst" is always quenched so to speak yet they are telling men how much w…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 08:52 PM
-3

"There should be more to a relationship than sex." Women speaking on how important sex should be for a man is akin to a billionaire saying "money isn't important" while on his private jet, eating a 5 star meal on a monday afternoon. A woman can have sex with virtually any man she wants, at any time. Biologically, a womans libido compared to a mans is like the libido of an asexual Tibetan Monk and yet, women still sleep around... Its easy to claim men only value sex in a relationship, when you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:39 PM
8

What on earth are you talking about? Your entire point is "men are stronger than women therefore men are evil and deserve to suffer for being born the stronger gender" Do you hear yourself speak? The envy and malice behind this perspective is disturbing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 03:55 AM
–

Would I get in bed with them? The answer is yes Yes, because they are conventionally attractive...showing you how attraction is not nebulous. You acknowledge conventionally attractive people are indeed attractive... If attraction is so quantiable, then please enlighten me. Attraction is primarily based on objective physical metrics. Without this, there is no attraction baseline. You would not be attracted to a 2/10 as attraction is rooted in physical appearance primarily. Secondary attraction me…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:05 AM
0

Typical ad hominem response because you cant justify the illogical claim. "If you dated more you would see that I am right."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:58 AM
3

Ignoring your passive aggresive tone and emotional language lets break this down. I made the inaccuracy abundantly clear. OP specifically says in the first line, {this is mostly to talk about the "men don't have a type" or "I dont have a type lies."} Here she claims men don't have a type going as far as to call it a lie. Now, what is a "type" in a dating context? Type is the characteristics of a person with which one finds the most attractive (e.g looks.) OP then tries to justify that men don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 11:53 AM
2

Ah, the good old ad hominem instead of addressing the point made... If I don't agree I am autistic or a native speaker. Nice one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 11:13 PM
2

Neither. Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 10:58 PM
2

Care to elaborate? I am open to a logical discussion if you disagree with or misunderstand the point made.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 10:47 PM
-2

Attraction is nebulous. How is it nebulous when there are objective metrics which make someone attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 09:20 PM
2

This post is contradictory, I'm not sure why people are agreeing with it. Having a type and being around a type of person due to circumstance are not the same thing. If my type is blonde women and I am around brunettes and so date them that does not make brunettes my type...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 08:55 PM
5

You're trying to make attraction cold hard rules instead of the nebulous thing it is. Women want the world to be perceived as nebulous so that they can pick and choose which side of the fence suits them in any situation or discussion. You could say women are the ultimate opportunists. Instead of saying he is attractive because he is tall and has money, some women will instead say "he makes me feel x" so they dont have to mention the superficial triggers which are the active ingredients behind th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 08:34 PM
1

Having kids isn’t an achievement either, from Oxford Languages · Learn more achievement /əˈtʃiːvm(ə)nt/ noun 1. a thing done successfully with effort, skill, or courage. "to reach this stage is a great achievement" That which takes effort is an achievement. Childbirth takes effort therefore it is an achievement. Sex for a man takes effort therefore it is an achievement. Its insane I have to break down such a rudimentary and basic fact but you are somehow unable to comprehend the logic here. Abso…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 11:08 PM
1

If sex is an achievement, the woman becomes the challenge to overcome, Sex is an achievement for men, the same way a woman having kids is an achievement. Does that mean the kids "become a challenge to overcome??" Is saying congratulations to a mother who has given birth "an insulting way to talk about people??" There is no insult in sex being an achievement for men, the same way there is no insult in children being an achievement for women. I think you have a negative association with the word "…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 09:07 PM
0

I see the disconnect. You are misunderstanding what the word achievement means. Something doesn't have to be a reward to be an achievement. A trophy is a reward, winning the race is an achievement. Getting a degree is a reward, passing all your exams is an achievement. Having sex is not a reward, but for a man it is an achievement. Do you see the point? Sex is an achievement for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 06:37 PM
-1

The cognitive dissonance in your response is truly remarkable... Calling a guy a virgin is just an easy jab, like calling someone broke or short. Why isn't calling a woman a virgin insulting? Because sex is not an achievement for a woman. Why is calling a man a virgin insulting? Because sex is an achievement for a man. And viriginity is the absence of sex. Why is calling a man short insulting? Because women are attracted to height, as its a key determiner of dimorphism in men. In short, height i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 04:53 PM
0

Not for a woman. It certainly is for a man though as I am sure you are well aware. Men are praised for getting sex and mocked for not getting sex, mostly being mocked by women. Funny how women mock virgins and insult men calling then virgins or incels when its convenient and then tell men sex isnt important when its convenient. Blatant cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:48 PM
9

There’s not a double standard here. You completely dodged OP's point. Men watching porn is disliked, but women watching porn is considered fine. That is the double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:37 PM
2

Interestingly enough, no woman here is disagreeing. Looks like you are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 12:53 AM
2

I disagree wholeheartedly. Its not "women of reddit," its women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 12:32 AM
1

"We can argue about whether men have a much stronger desire for sex" No, we can't. Thinking that this is even debatable shows your lack of understanding of hormones and the human body. Testosterone is literally a sex hormone. There is no debate about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 11:27 PM
–

Well written.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 11:22 PM
1

Very well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 04:12 PM
–

In your opinion, how are women mistreated today?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 11:12 AM
14

That would be well above average. The majority of women would feel pain at that size.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:41 AM
1

And what size was this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:22 AM
4

Say exactly what you said in your first sentence. We as humans tend to overthink a lot. Its already worded perfectly.
/r/RedPillWomen11/12/25 04:39 PM
4

You both reinstalled the app. Kind of hypocritical if you ask me.
/r/RedPillWomen17/09/25 12:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter