TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lolachick Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by Lolachick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree with the logical reasoning behind your first statement, but I disagree with the logic in this one. Do you ever "feel the Bern" on a RP site? There's definitely a political element to it. Per rage masturbation, I see very little Chicken soup for the soul types of stuff in the sphere. I would have never even heard of Triggly puff if not for TRP. That doesn't make it ipso facto wrong...it's actually pretty normal to fight against what one believes to be a destructive value system.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 06:35 PM
3

It has been my experience that most of the worst decisions people make can be attributed to poor evaluation choices. Put a high priority on the right things, you'll see much better results. Ted Roosevelt's quote: ""If you could kick the person in the pants responsible for most of your trouble, you wouldn't sit for a month." Rings true. Unfortunately, most people are terrible evaluators and make very poor decisions. Furthermore, the poor decision makers also tend to attract like minded people. So…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 12:10 PM
6

<i>"If another guy came along and showed interest in you who was noticeably "better", you would think about it."</i> She would, but only if her personal cost/benefit considerations led her to do so. People aren't simply the product of their material assets and attributes. Shared history, trust, mutual respect and interdependence that develops over time, and so forth also have value and that value is very high (to folks who appreciate and understand that...unfortunately too few do, and then they …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 12:01 PM
2

It is true that people base their personal decisions on cost/benefit analysis. It is, however, not true at all that people are rational actors. They're anything but, and they make horrible decisions based on absurd cost/benefit evaluations (where emotion triumphs reason). This is obvious in everything, from relationships to politics to the economy. Even by the fact there are so many obese people. Did they become obese "rationally"? Or did they like they just like the taste of potato chips more t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 11:56 AM
2

Just to add, show me a person who claims to love unconditionally, and that's a person who obtains validation based on others good opinion of them. Which doesn't reflect well on them, really. "I love Bob even though he is useless to me!" really isn't terribly flattering to either Bob or his "love". It really is neither love nor respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 11:32 AM
1

<i>"It's very rare I hear anyone say they're with someone because of how they make them feel or because of that person's character."</i> That's exactly it, and it really isn't so rare. Unless a person is with another person for the validation of OTHER people's approval, one is with his or her "love" exactly because of the way that person makes him or her feel. "Falling in love" is loving the way that person makes you feel. So...if that person is super special in one's estimation, you think, "wow…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 11:28 AM
1

Ah, gotcha. It's kind of hard to know what one would do AFTER the kids are born. Things change, decisions change. It's a lot harder to juggle family and work than it might appear to those without children. I've done it both ways (SAHM, part time employed with kids, full time employed with kids). Part time was just as difficult as full time, but maybe I had the wrong job.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:18 PM
1

And divorce has more impact on the children than most anything else. So...that too is a (potential) cost. And then therapy before the divorce (and sometimes after). And then the lawyer fees, and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 12:16 PM
1

Well, there is value to having a current skill set as well. If, after careful consideration, it's a value worth paying for (in terms of money and time and personal sacrifice for your progeny) that's one thing...but if it is something one is paying to do that would be the "luxury", wouldn't it? Not the other way around. And you've mentioned you are divorced. Dual income situations very often strain a marriage when it comes to juggling the children. One career is always going to be sacrificed to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 11:33 AM
1

I never understand when people say staying at home with the children is a "luxury few can afford". Let's do some math here...very easy math. The average weekly cost of a day care center is $341 for two children. With taxes, it takes over 400 dollars a week to cover that cost. Before other work related expenses, that is 1600 dollars a month off the top. If there's a car payment so she can drive that second car to work, that's about five hundred a month in pretax income. Add clothing, add eating o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 02:30 AM
2

<i>"Really, they won't admit that sex is far easier for women to get and conversely, a lot of effort for men to get. Many women believe men get sex as easily as they do, which is just not true."</i> False dichotomy. Sex is obviously far easier for women. That's why prostitution is the "oldest profession". It wouldn't be so if women found it difficult to have willing sex partners or had to invest a lot of energy into getting them. Free market still stands true. Value isn't determined by effort, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 03:56 PM
2

Furthermore, if it's an issue of money paid/effort made that makes him a "stud"...that is very much along the lines of asserting a person is a stud if he pays for a prostitute. Number of sexual partners is no measure for "stud-dom". Much like the rest of the "free market" the measure of worth of something is what others perceive the value to be. So...a guy with a lot of beautiful, aka high value, women who want to have sex with him (without payment) would be high value.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 01:56 PM
5

Hm. Very few of the men I know who have had sex with 100 or more women I would call "studs" (as with all things there are outliers). They are usually low value (like their women). There's not much point of pride in being Mister sloppy 50ths, 60ths, 70ths. If they brag about it, they are lower value still.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/16 01:39 PM
1

No, I'm saying people should be nice to others. Period. Not only because they immediately need or want something. That's actually the opposite of entitlement. If you see a guy who is super solicitious to the pretty girl, but treats the plain girl like crap for no reason, you know that isn't a nice person. Pretty girls notice (unless they are very very dim, which some are...but don't count on it). FWIW, this is equally true of all human relationships. If a woman is nice to someone she needs and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 10:41 AM
1

The Jekyll/hyde behavior pattern you have described might be rare. But its rarity does not support your claim. The casual observor doen't note Jekyll/Hyde style personality changes so much as a difference in behavior toward women he wants to have sex with, and women he doesn't. People who are only nice to those they have use for, but by contrast very unpleasant toward people they don't, are not nice people. This covers a great portion of self described "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:02 PM
1

"If you look hard enough, can't you find 'manipulation' in any sexual/ romantic relationship?" By Randian school of thought, yes. Every human interaction is based on selfishness and manipulation is just an inherent part of the equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 10:48 PM
2

Since I'm a chick (see alias) I'll offer this sounds very much like what a chick would complain about. I'm going to the coffee shop soon to meet with other chicks and I'll undoubtedly hear their highbrow intellectual ramblings about little items of daily minutia (did he put the toilet seat down/leave a log in the potty/throw dirty socks on the floor et al) and what these indicate ("He doesn't care I clean all the time!" "It's disrespectful to leave a bad smell!" "what about that toothpaste cap!"…
/r/askMRP08/05/16 12:17 PM
1

<i>"really raking you over the coals"</i> Or logs. <i>"This sounds rough."</i> Or at least stinky. I think he's making a mountain out of a pie hill.
/r/askMRP08/05/16 11:42 AM
1

Try to Golitely on her. No reason to lose your shit over this. More seriously....Has anyone here ever heard of air freshner? They came up with this cool product called febreze a while back.
/r/askMRP08/05/16 12:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter